portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary united states

imperialism & war | media criticism

Iraq-Raping Neocons Are Suddenly Posing As Woke Progressives To Gain Support

I once scoffed at claims of "white male privilege," dismissing such criticisms as mere "political correctness." But in the Trump era I have had my consciousness raised. Seriously. Me in @ForeignPolicy:  https://t.co/OpgCFew2cF
-- Max Boot (@MaxBoot) December 27, 2017
 link to www.greanvillepost.com

Boot, who is a PNAC signatory and senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (which tells us something about this den of criminals and sociopaths—eds), published an article yesterday in Foreign Affairs which perfectly matches the newfound love of progressivism in his neocon soulmate Bill Kristol. The article, titled "2017 Was the Year I Learned About My White Privilege", details in halting, equivocation-laden prose the months-long journey into awakening that this lying warmonger claims to have experienced during the Trump administration.

This spectacularly evil man, who wrote an essay titled "The Case for American Empire" just weeks after 9/11 in which he called in plain English for America to "unambiguously to embrace its imperial role," is now seeing his latest essay shared eagerly by Democrats everywhere enthusiastically exclaiming "Look! See? This conservative gets it!"

Nothing is beyond these psychopaths. Nothing.

"white privilege" (coming from likes of Max Boot), lol — 03.Jan.2018 03:07


same M.O. as former treasury secretary Hank Paulson (and other CFR elites, etc.) saying they saw "no alternative" but to vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016.

as noted in the article you posted, blues:
more an indicator of rising tides of anti-Trumpism than anything else.

Apropos also a recent GG tweet :
Glenn Greenwald
✔ @ggreenwald

It's not so accurate to say that, in 2017, Bill Kristol became a Democrat. It's more accurate to say that in 2017, Democrats became Bill Kristol.
6:44 AM - Dec 26, 2017

RE: "consciousness raised",

if a PNAC signatory can make these kinds of comments about Iran (see ^above...) coming up on 2 decades after 11 September 2001, well then I suppose he and others of his ilk simply expect the average American citizen to swallow it / fall into line.

p.s. "No Need to Repent For Support of Iraq War" — 03.Jan.2018 03:14


^ that was headline of a March 18, 2013 Max Boot-penned article, a screenshot of which is at the end of the original article linked above.

Yet another dividing barrier between the anti-Trumpers and current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue :


Donald Trump's Unique Human Decency On Iraq

by John V. Walsh / October 15th, 2016

From a humanitarian standpoint, the content of Trump's condemnation of the war is outstanding. In fact, to grieve over the lives of Americans but not the people of Iraq is a form of racism. Trump is virtually unique among major politicians in taking this stand on the lives of innocents the US has attacked. He should be praised for it.

As election day approaches, it is time to ignore the noise of the moment and think clearly about the crucial issues facing us, none of which is more important than war or peace. The War on Iraq has been a touchstone for these issues over the last 14 years.

On Iraq, Clinton and her operatives have sought to avoid at all costs an accurate comparison of her position over the last 14 years to Trump's. "What did Trump say?" has been buried by the Clintonites and company. "When did he say it?" has been slyly substituted for it. The time line has been used to equate the positions of Hillary the most notorious of hawks with that of Trump.

Let us have a look at Trump's words as well as the dates they were uttered. And compare them to Hillary's: