portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts united states

9.11 investigation | education

The Continued Denial of Science in America

In 2017, hundreds of thousands of Americans took to the streets to protest the Trump Administration's denial of science. However, most people in this new science-promoting movement willfully deny basic laws of science when those laws relate to one particularly sensitive subject of national discourse.

For example, many Americans have denied the Law of Conservation of Momentum as it relates to the destruction of the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11, 2001. Although conservation of momentum is taught and understood by students in secondary school, the alleged violation of this law is widely accepted by those who are faced with the obvious, evidence-based alternative that explosives were used to bring the buildings down.

Similarly, Americans who support the official account have also denied the Law of the Conservation of Angular Momentum. In this case, the top section of the south tower rotated off its axis and should have continued rotating and falling intact along the side of the building but it did not. Instead the top section was simply pulverized in mid air by unseen forces.

The Law of the Conservation of Energy was also violated on 9/11, if one believes the official government account. One way in which this can be seen is with regard to temperatures needed to achieve the government's claim that steel softened throughout a wide swath of each building. The jet fuel and office furnishings in the Twin Towers did not provide the energy needed for the steel components to reach temperatures needed to soften steel. More importantly, molten metal was observed at the site of the WTC destruction and this fact can only be explained by the presence of thermitic materials, for which there is an enormous amount of evidence.
 http://digwithin.net/2017/12/29/the-continued-denial-of-science-in-america/

The Continued Denial of Science in America

Posted on December 29, 2017 by Kevin Ryan

In 2017, hundreds of thousands of Americans took to the streets to protest the Trump Administration's denial of science. This began with the "March for Science" in April and continued throughout the year with scientists and supporters trying to find their political voice. However, most people in this new science-promoting movement willfully deny basic laws of science when those laws relate to one particularly sensitive subject of national discourse.

For example, many Americans have denied the Law of Conservation of Momentum as it relates to the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. This point was made in a peer-reviewed scientific paper published in a journal of civil engineering (see point #5). Although conservation of momentum is taught and understood by students in secondary school, the alleged violation of this law is widely accepted by those who are faced with the obvious, evidence-based alternative that explosives were used to bring the buildings down.

Similarly, Americans who support the official account have also denied the Law of the Conservation of Angular Momentum. In this case, the top section of the south tower rotated off its axis and should have continued rotating and falling intact along the side of the building but it did not. Instead the top section was simply pulverized in mid air by unseen forces.

The Law of the Conservation of Energy was also violated on 9/11, if one believes the official government account. One way in which this can be seen is with regard to temperatures needed to achieve the government's claim that steel softened throughout a wide swath of each building. The jet fuel and office furnishings in the Twin Towers did not provide the energy needed for the steel components to reach temperatures needed to soften steel. More importantly, molten metal was observed at the site of the WTC destruction and this fact can only be explained by the presence of thermitic materials, for which there is an enormous amount of evidence.

The U.S. government took great pains over a period of years to ignore the evidence for what actually happened at the WTC site while taking a politically driven, anti-scientific approach to it. Sadly, subsequent administrations and many professional scientists have ignored this political abuse of science in order to avoid sensitive implications that could threaten their careers. Today's science-promoting Americans have, in many cases, also ignored the evidence and have therefore practiced the opposite of what they preach. That is, abuse of science is bad when Trump does it but is perfectly acceptable when "conspiracy theories" are the only other choice.

Meanwhile, 9/11 victim's families continue to fight for justice and scientists in other countries can be seen rejecting the spread of America's anti-science approach.

When Americans are truly willing to stand up for science no matter the political implications, society might begin to heal from the violence and destruction of American values that began with those fateful crimes. Until then, the world will continue to suffer the consequences of the willful ignorance of science in America.


__________



See Also


Momentum
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum

law of conservation of momentum
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum#Conservation

Angular Momentum
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_momentum

Conservation of angular momentum
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_momentum#Conservation_of_angular_momentum

Conservation of energy
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy



9/11 Experiments: The Force Behind The Motion
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2016/03/431780.shtml

9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2014/11/428610.shtml

9/11 First Transparent, Unbiased Computer Modeling Of WTC 7's Collapse Released
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/11/431073.shtml

9/11 Tower 7 - A Firefighter's Analysis
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2016/08/432884.shtml

Interview Transcript : Tony Szamboti : On NIST's 9/11 Sins Of Omission
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2016/05/432408.shtml

9/11: The Pentagon's B-Movie
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2017/09/435068.shtml

US Government Intentionally Destroys 9/11 Evidence
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2016/06/432549.shtml

16 years on, the controlled demolition of the 9/11 official story
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2017/09/435029.shtml

Sixteen More Reasons To Question 9/11
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2017/09/435067.shtml

Propaganda Can't Melt Steel Beams (9/11)
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/12/431300.shtml

Has 9/11 Been Forgotten?
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2017/06/434808.shtml

AE911Truth Letter To Editor Of Boston Globe RE: WTC Skyscraper Collapses
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/12/431161.shtml

9/11: Did Experts, Emergency Responders Know Twin Towers Were Going To Collapse?
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2016/06/432548.shtml

Russia Conspiracy vs 9/11 Conspiracy: U.S. Corporate Mass Media
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2017/06/434844.shtml

Real Americans Question 9/11
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2017/04/434629.shtml

The New York Times' 9/11 Propaganda
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/11/430932.shtml

9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/09/430596.shtml

How To Spy The 9/11 Lie
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/10/430687.shtml

Architect vs. Blacksmith: Viral 9/11 Truth-Debunking Blacksmith Gets It All Wrong
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2016/01/431497.shtml

For the undying 9/11 MORONIC replies
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2016/02/431712.shtml

(Kathy Griffin) When Will A U.S. Celebrity Sacrifice Their Career For 9/11?
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2017/06/434801.shtml

9/11 Free Fall 6/8/17: James Corbett and Richard Gage, AIA
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2017/06/434847.shtml

9/11 Exposed - 2nd Edition (2015) Full Documentary Film
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2017/04/434572.shtml

Incontrovertible - New 9/11 Documentary by Tony Rooke
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/12/431301.shtml

9/11 Ten Short Videos About Nine Eleven
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2017/04/434570.shtml

homepage: homepage: http://digwithin.net/2017/12/29/the-continued-denial-of-science-in-america/
address: address: Dig Within


You're missing something ... 02.Jan.2018 21:06

Red X Society

...You can't change the Past, but You can change the Future.

The catalyst of all that you are presented in Media, Broadcast, Print and Radio. Destroy that Machine and They can't lie to you anymore.