portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts united states


Inconsistencies in the ethical declaration of death

The first criteria for the determination of brain death were developed in 1968 in part to address concerns that had arisen with the retrieval of organs for transplantation. However, there is inconsistency in the neurological criteria for death between jurisdictions, between patient populations, and in the use of confirmatory tests.
Many patients diagnosed as brain dead have intact neurohumoral control of
hypothalamic-pituitary function, demonstrate normal hypothalamic mediated thermoregulatory control, and have intact autonomic function: they do not have hemodynamic collapse, they have physical findings such as bowel sounds, and are reported to have autonomic reflexes (tachycardia and hypertension) at the
time of organ retrieval.

The current clinical criteria for brain death are not consistent with the stated objective of the outcome "to identify the permanent cessation of entire brain function". Nor are the clinical criteria for brain death either universally understood, and/or correctly applied, and at least in one report, two cases were presented where the criteria were deliberately misrepresented in an attempt to retrieve an organ for transplantation.

Some physicians actively euthanize comatose patients for their transplantable organs, an ongoing practice that is particularly disturbing in light of a British study that indicated that up to 41 percent of seemingly 'permanently comatose' patients had been "misdiagnosed" and that some were actually awake and aware.