portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts global

9.11 investigation | media criticism

AE911Truth Letter To Editor Of Boston Globe RE: WTC Skyscraper Collapses

[ original Boston Globe article, 11/16/2015 : The 'truthers' and 9/11 ]

Alex Beam's portrayal of "architect truthers" is yet another disappointing example of a journalist resorting to ad hominem attacks and avoiding the facts when discussing the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on Sept. 11, 2001.

Sadly, not one sentence of Beam's column examines the evidence for or against the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7. Instead, he devotes 600 words to revealing his own ill-founded bias.
 https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/letters/2015/12/04/evidence-still-raises-questions-over-world-trade-center-collapses/5xWSDfumsdDhw9XFThirKJ/story.html

Evidence still raises questions over World Trade Center collapses

December 04, 2015

Alex Beam's portrayal of "architect truthers" is yet another disappointing example of a journalist resorting to ad hominem attacks and avoiding the facts when discussing the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on Sept. 11, 2001 ("The 'truthers' and 9/11,"  link to www.bostonglobe.com Opinion, Nov. 16).

Sadly, not one sentence of Beam's column examines the evidence for or against the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7. Instead, he devotes 600 words to revealing his own ill-founded bias.

He cherry-picks the appearance of three nonexperts from the 15-minute video "Architects & Engineers Solving the Mystery of Building 7," but doesn't highlight any of the film's "various experts." Noting that some Americans think that what happened that day hasn't "been fully explained," he declares, "I don't agree," but gives no evidence-based reason for disagreeing. His position rests on his revulsion at the idea that someone "our own government," he supposes consciously demolished the World Trade Center.

As building professionals, we at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth try not to let personal feelings interfere with investigating the three worst structural failures in modern history. Nearly 2,400 architects and engineers, not including the 109 who signed our petition at the recent annual trade show ABX, have joined us because we stick to science.

The physical evidence shows that scattered office fires could not have caused the 47-story WTC 7 to collapse symmetrically into its footprint. (Imagine Boston's 52-story Prudential Tower completely collapsing in seven seconds from small fires it's hard to, isn't it?) The evidence also shows that the twin towers were not leveled by the airplane impacts and ensuing fires.

The implications are indeed far-reaching, and that is why we urge people to study all the evidence before reaching a conclusion.

Richard Gage

Berkeley, Calif.

The writer is the founder and CEO of the nonprofit organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

homepage: homepage: http://https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/letters/2015/12/04/evidence-still-raises-questions-over-world-trade-center-collapses/5xWSDfumsdDhw9XFThirKJ/story.html


Same thought 06.Dec.2015 05:50

Garth

Interestingly, the guy who wrote the column--which is a terrible item, particularly the part about the evolutionary biologist somehow lacking the credentials to say a poor study was done because she is in a different field of science--holds a similar racist tenant as the conspiracy theorists. He thinks Moslems are all evil and the conspiracy theorists thinks they are too stupid to have done this.

" racist tenant [sic] " 06.Dec.2015 05:50 06.Dec.2015 18:14

_

You mean,

a renter / hotel guest who is racist ?


RE: [Garth: QUOTE] "the conspiracy theorists thinks they are too stupid to have done this"

" they are too stupid " : who's "they" ??

Skeptics of the U.S. government explanation(s) for what occurred on 11 September 2001 are merely interested in the scientific and documented facts of what occurred, not in 'theorizing' an overarching explanation for all of that day's events, "who was behind it" etc.

Whoever pulled of 9/11, however "they" accomplished it It is amply obvious "they" were NOT "stupid".

cf. Mr. Gage's remark at the end of his letter [quote] : " ... we urge people to study all the evidence before reaching a conclusion. "


And of course, Garth "too stupid / racist" has been wholly exposed and debunked here before:


RE: " Brown people are too stupid to have done this " 22.Feb.2015 18:53
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/02/429231.shtml#441321

Further to the " Brown people did / didn't / couldn't do it " 22.Feb.2015 19:25
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/02/429231.shtml#441326

" racist assumption that people with brown skin are too stupid to have done this " 28.Jul.2015 05:57
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/07/430151.shtml#443684


and
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/09/430474.shtml#443973

Thanks fer playin'. Troll harder next time, bro 'Garth'

Richard Gage Is An Architect 07.Dec.2015 21:39

blues

And a very persuasive speaker too.

Well, all the maths and science tell that the 9-11 narrative was totally a government issued psy-op. Nobody can in good conscience dispute this. They may deny, deny, as they must. After all they cannot face it. But the truth it is.

We all do that; deny the obvious certainty imposed by mortality and its inevitable brutality.

Everybody knows who did 9-11. And it was of course not the famous 19 box cutters.

But we must pretend. Must hide behind -- mechanical machine voting, and want of -- simple score voting. Must ignore responsibilities obvious for millennia. Must cleave to our corporate academic masters.

Since we have assumed the role of serfs. When we really need to be sovereign. And free. And pure.

Can we shuffle off the dirt that has been thrust upon us?

Or must we die honorless?