portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary united states

9.11 investigation | media criticism

CNN Digs Into Official Saudi Involvement in 911 Attacks

Forget Trump and Emails- The really big story of the year may be how 911 "Truthers" were right all along.
There it is on CNN! Saudi involvement in the 911 attacks. Official involvement too. Senators are finally speaking out about the greatest U.S. Government cover up since Dallas. Certainly has taken long enough. No big shock to we Indymedia fans. I bet the Bush's are a little nervous having their oil cartel bros in the 911 spotlight. Cheney must be having spasms.

Confused 06.Sep.2015 18:41

Garth

I'm confused here. I thought the 19 hijackers were not real. Or they were aliens. Or the planes never existed. Or the buildings were blown up from the inside.

That they were in contact with agents from Saudi Arabia not only makes sense...well, why go further? The conspiracy theories you usually throw around make no sense.

Confused, 'Garth' - 07.Sep.2015 20:35

?

what precisely is it you're "confused" about?

( yes we're fully aware that your post was disinformationalist and distractive in its intent... i.e. to deliberately sow confusion, herein. )

poow widdle Garth. He's confuthed.


'Garth' wrote:
-----
" I thought the 19 hijackers were not real "
-----

Didja really? Who said they "weren't real"?

Were Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray "not real"? Sirhan Sirhan "isn't real" ?


'Garth' wrote:
-----
" Or they were aliens "
-----

uh huh. The old UFO angle, courtesy of disinformationalist 'Garth' natch.


'Garth' wrote:
-----
" Or the planes never existed "
-----

You really thought this 'Garth'? or is this just more shit-talking on your part?


'Garth' wrote:
-----
" Or the buildings were blown up from the inside "
-----

"the buildings" - Which specific buildings are you referring to 'Garth'?

The Pentagon, perhaps? (Struck by an airliner, in the exact location of major renovations and limited personnel assignments during September 2001)

"blown up" - Specifically what do you mean? World Trade Center Building 7 wasn't struck by an aircraft. WTC 1 and 2 were struck by aircraft which effectively "blew up" - the key is though, what __brought the three NYC skyscrapers down__ .

even NIST has officially stated that it was (not a 'blow up', but) due to office fires. (Yep, no not 'airliner impacts'.)


'Garth' wrote:
-----
" That they were in contact with agents from Saudi Arabia not only makes sense "
-----

Not only? What else does it make, 'Garth'?

Does it make sense, that (if ? the 'hijackers' were mostly-all Saudi Arabian) the first country bombed and illegally invaded was Afghanistan? Followed by Iraq? All while key Saudi leaders were covertly ported out of the U.S. during the week of the original attacks?


'Garth' wrote:
-----
" ...well, why go further? "
-----

Why are you here today 'Garth'?
(indeed yes we know why - don't bother)


'Garth' wrote:
-----
" The conspiracy theories you usually throw around make no sense "
-----

The official U.S. government explanation for the events of 11 September 2001 make a lot of sense?

do they, 'Garth'?

RE: "conspiracy theories" -- Which ones in particular are those, inferred "you [sic- referring to rAT / whoever] usually throw around" ?

or are they just the "usual" [ 'Garth' - strawman / association fallacy ] ones?

the usual U.S. government explanation(s) for what happened on 9/11, perhaps?

All any 9/11 skeptic has ever asked for is a better, more complete, less patently outrageous etc. explanation -- from the U.S. government itself -- about what occurred that day. But of course after a decade and a half it looks like that won't be happening anytime soon.

RE: the '28 Missing Pages', Saudis etc. 07.Sep.2015 21:16

see recent newswire article below -

The 9/11 Joint Congressional Inquiry And 28 Missing Pages

Various U.S. government leaders have since suggested that the missing 28 pages point to Saudi Arabia's complicity in the 9/11 crimes. However such musings fail to discuss other important issues, like the links between the Saudi regime and the Western deep state, or the fact that, from the start, even the Saudis were calling for the 28 pages to be released. Discussion of the missing 28 pages also omits mention of the highly suspicious nature of the Inquiry's investigation and its leaders.

 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2015/08/430191.shtml