portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary global

gender & sexuality | imperialism & war

Shadow of Western War 'Games' Falls On Friendly Olympics

If the reasons behind a policy of denying biology are not obvious, the political synergies associated with what is effectively a new 'zero child policy' speak for themselves. Harkening back to longstanding goals of Western power for extending control, they suggest a move to impose a new industrial order over biological nature...

Falling reproduction rates mean depopulation. Control over population numbers, or quantity, may also serve as a lever of control over population 'quality,' or genetics [as the wall flowers at the Springtime ball, so to speak, are led away from the gene pool].

In this way (together with a chemical estrogen tsunami, from GMOs to BPA in the environment) the New Order policies act against fertility, in a likely move to bring the regimentation of industrial production to bear on human reproduction, for genetic quality control. This is eugenics, an important part of the Nazi-era, Western elites' politics.
As Russia's Sochi Games draw to a close, we see the smoke rising from the feared, Olympic terror attack--not in Russia but on its doorstep in Kiev, yet another regime change hotspot. This is the real danger, as an old spectre haunts Europe--and the world--anew.
Commentary: Shadow of Western War 'Games' Falls on Friendly Sochi Olympics


Congratulations to the people and leadership of Russia on their success at the Sochi Winter Olympic Games of 2014. The spirit of the games, that the friendly, peaceful competition of sporting diplomacy between nations can lessen risk of war was well represented in the country whose diplomatic efforts recently won a stay of war escalation, if not peace, in Syria.

Off Piste--Hooligans in the Press Gallery
If the Games themselves were all about good will, the belligerent West--the interventionist party in numerous wars since 2001--was having none of it. The leaders of the G8 NATO members, with the exception of Italy, boycotted the Sochi Games. (Italy's PM has now been dismissed in a party 'coup,' as if by way of discipline for falling out of lockstep). As it happens, this is the very 'war camp' stymied for now by Russia's peacemaking efforts in the Middle East. But this was not of course the reason given by the West for the attendance boycott. Instead, it wrapped itself in the flag du jour, a rainbow banner, to hypocritically march into the stadium as champions of human rights, in Orwellian fashion.

Off piste of the games, in the media gallery as it were, was another spectacle --the lurid sideshow of Western media hooliganism, raining down scorn on Russia's Olympic pageant. It's a futile exercise to publish yet another editorial taking Western media pronouncements at face value and weighing their merit--like debating air quality on battlelines befogged with clouds of poison gas.

One example of the grotesque distortions on offer will suffice to represent the whole monstrous Hall of Mirrors that is the lens of private Western media--where the fate of stray dogs in Sochi is more noteworthy than that of Syrians saved thanks to Russia's efforts.

These are our human rights champions. If propaganda were an Olympic sport, the shamelessly hypocritical West would long ago have been disqualified from claiming the moral high ground, having committed far too many flagrant human rights fouls. So what to make then of the rainbow banner, the West's prominent Sochi protest pretext? It is a human rights fig leaf for the Western New Order's policy of eugenics.


Some background
The rainbow banner sometimes seen flying at Sochi dates from 1984 when it was originally linked to the Rainbow Coalition, an African-American civil rights movement taking in diverse, disadvantaged identity groups. The coalition stood against racial discrimination but still advocated race differentiation (in law) for the purpose of affirmative action, seen as a temporary necessity to gain an equal footing for the disadvantaged groups. Ultimately, the anti-discrimination goal would mean complete color-blindness in law making.

Subsequently, the progressive, grassroots coalition was absorbed and transformed by the corporate US Democratic Party, and made the leap from advocacy for 'color blindness' to the feminist promotion of 'gender blindness.' (In this way, in the name of fairness, American feminism ironically would effectively suppress traditional femininity, in a muddle of equal rights with equivalence.) Finally, the banner would be adopted by the 'gay rights movement.'

Rainbow flag--Diversity or Uniformity?
The continuing trend in the US, pioneer of look-alike mass-produced cars, seems to be an eroding of 'gender-based' (biology-based) identity altogether: a cultural symptom of the intolerance of difference in a factory society that demands uniformity (machines cannot tolerate differences in the objects they process).

Paradoxically, what had started as a pro-diversity movement [hence the rainbow of colors] has become a cudgel for conformity and uniformity--in line with the ever expanding Fordist, corporate imperium of the West. The eroding of gender difference is of a piece with Western militarism, which demands sameness under threat of violence (c.f. 'feminist' war propaganda in Afghanistan, for example. Here, instead of respect for sovereignty and cultural differences, we have chauvinist intolerance of difference, masquerading as progressiveness--a convenient mask or pretext for wars for empire.)

Save the Males
Note well that the rainbow movement's new name, LGBT, takes the form of a Pentagon-speak acronym, like USAF or NORTHCOM. If this connotes attack, the point should be well taken, because the promotion of gay orientation (as opposed to tolerance) is a tug of war --to promote one side is to attack the other--and with political ramifications for a nation's demographics, for the preservation of the family unit, and for our offspring's right to freely reproduce. Matters of preference or taste must not be tyrannically promoted for all, like someone's loud techno on the bus.

Attacks on gender type, hormonal or otherwise, are also attacks on fertility, on the freedom to reproduce. What Chinese philosophy calls yin and yang contraries, like male-female, are the form of the creative principle itself. To oppose this with an imposed factory-like uniformity is to oppose life. This is of course what forces of destruction often do.

Such absurdities as the EU's male-male couple 'right to found a family' [in the gender neutral Charter of Human Rights, Article 9] or Obamacare's maternity leave for men make clear the denial even of the biological facts of life--the inanities of factory creep trying to overturn biological nature.

Under the flag of 'equality' (read: uniformity), the West forces round pegs in square holes, like a drooling, stink-pants toddler on the playroom floor, blurting "Same!"

Even a gay, feminist American social critic [Camille Paglia] has criticized what she described as a new feminization or neutering trend, and called the blind alley of 'gender neutrality' a path to 'suicide' for Western civilization.

Hidden Agenda
Yet there may be method to the madness. If the reasons behind a policy of denying biology are not obvious, the political synergies associated with what is effectively a new 'zero child policy' speak for themselves. Harkening back to longstanding goals of Western power for extending control, they suggest a move to impose a new industrial order over biological nature...

Falling reproduction rates mean depopulation. Control over population numbers, or quantity, may also serve as a lever of control over population 'quality,' or genetics [as the wall flowers at the Springtime ball, so to speak, are led away from the gene pool].

In this way (together with a chemical estrogen tsunami, from GMOs to BPA in the environment) the New Order policies act against fertility, in a likely move to bring the regimentation of industrial production to bear on human reproduction, for genetic quality control. This is eugenics, an important part of the Nazi-era, Western elites' politics.
*
As Russia's Sochi Games draw to a close, we see the smoke rising from the feared, Olympic terror attack--not in Russia but on its doorstep in Kiev, yet another regime change hotspot. This is the real danger, as an old spectre haunts Europe--and the world--anew.

This time, in Ukraine, the West is finally outed, as it supports violent neo-Nazi opposition forces (Svoboda Party) against a democratically elected government. Now flying their true colors, the remade and resurgent Western neo-fascism is again on the march... arriving at Russia's doorstep, as in 1941, after a prolonged blitz of pyromania that has left a smoking trail of death and destruction since 2001 from Iraq and Afghanistan to Libya, Syria, and now Ukraine, on the brink of civil war.

[The Nazis began their own string of wars of aggression under the pretext of a 'humanitarian appeal' for the rights of ethnic Germans, in the Czechoslovak Sudetenland. ]

human rights in Russia????? 23.Feb.2014 09:27

rAT

Hahahahahahahahahah Putin is Stalin in Napoleonic drag! From imprisoned gays to slaughtered Ukranians, Ras Putin has shown himself to be a typical Russian tyrant. The games are a joke. Putin's buddies got all the construction contracts and fudged them all, stealing millions. Fake "terror" attacks before the games, to justify the overwhelming police state the "Olympics" has become. What a load of pure BS this post is.
Putin's  Three- Ring Circus
Putin's Three- Ring Circus "Ladeeez and Gentlemen......May I Present...."

wow 23.Feb.2014 11:01

Clyde

This may be one of the most disgusting, dictator-apologist pieces of garbage I have ever seen on Indymedia.

"because the promotion of gay orientation (as opposed to tolerance) is a tug of war --to promote one side is to attack the other"

Nobody is attacking straight people you halfwit. They are attacking discrimination by bigots. Can you seriously be this dense?


"The eroding of gender difference is of a piece with Western militarism, which demands sameness under threat of violence"

Yes, the struggle for gay rights is clearly just a tool of the diabolical west. It would be much better if everyone just allowed Putin to brutalize gay rights activists without us getting involved.

That you would defend both Putin's overwhelming state power, as well as those of the established government in the Ukraine which seeks to ally with Russia against the will of the people, shows that you are nothing more than a grossly unwashed mouthpiece for totalitarian state power and the status quo in eastern europe.

Russia vs. USA 23.Feb.2014 20:14

ch

80% of what that person wrote seems crazy, but I agree with one major point in here.

It is either propaganda, or hypocrisy - that has focused americans on criticizing Russia for their antigay laws. Guess what - these attitudes are widespread in the US, dozens of states don't allow gay marriage. The state of Arizona just made a big point of passing a law legalizing discrimination on the basis of sexuality.  http://edition.cnn.com/2014/02/22/opinion/whitaker-arizona-law/

Putin is very similar to Ronald Reagan in his political positions, and the US loved Ronald Reagan

Reagan was NOT "Loved" 24.Feb.2014 10:30

rAT

The only people who "loved" Reagan were narrow-minded bigots and other assorted examples of prejudiced sheeple. The media built Reagan into some sort of "everyman" Horatio Alger, when in reality he was a paid snitch for J. Edgar Hoover in Hollywood, and helped railroad hundreds of innocent film-industry workers into permanent unemployment. His anti-gay bias was disgusting to the max. He never even as much UTTERED the word "AIDS" until the disease reached epidemic proportions. His wife used the stars to co-ordinate his activities. True abuse of the astrological sciences. This was the key to his "teflon" reputation, not his fake 'righteousness'. The USA exports homophobic "Christian" groups all over the world. They have turned Jamaica into a nightmare for gays. It's like Hitler and Jews. Uganda is the worst- Thick with born-again hate mongers, their President the worst of all. They passed a death sentence for ANYONE caught in a "homosexual act". The UN and the EU freaked out so much they decided to change it to a life sentence instead. How merciful of them. Russia's Orthodox Church is completely homophobic and has instigated much of the current campaign against gays being waged by Putin, whose own sex life is a complete mystery. There's a huge difference between banning gay marriage and throwing folks in prison for kissing in a nightclub. Arizona is the dumbed-down capital of the USA. Whatever inhuman crap that cursed state dreams up is no surprise to anyone, and it doesn't foretell anything except that that wasteland will never change it's opiegooberKKK nature.