portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting united states

economic justice | government


UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER 12803, BUSH SR. PRIVATIZED MUCH OF OUR GOVERNMENT. what does this mean? it means that revenues intended to support government were suddenly diverted into private coffers, services became "billable" items and the American people were paying twice for their own government. it also created an adversarial relationship between the alleged government and the people that it served. suddenly, they were consumers and not the governors of the agencies that served them. this move created a private monopoly for the services BUT with enforcement powers.
It is believed; NONE of this would never been exposed had the duly constituted, outstanding, primary creditor not challenged J.P. MORGANS COLLATERAL BASE.

BY: V.K. Durham, CEO Durham Holding Trust, Tias 12087

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS by those they were taking orders from in these QUASI U.S. FEDERAL AGENCIES. 1992 President Bush PRIVATIZED all of the U.S. Federal Government Agencies, you know...which was under Executive Order 12803 (see)
 http://www.theantechamber.net/UsHistDoc/Exord12803/Exord12803Index.html .

"QUASI" (Blacks Law Dictionary Fourth Ed);
"As if; almost as it were; analogous to. This term is used in legal phraseology to indicate that one subject resembles another, but which it is compared, in certain characteristics between them" [end quote].
In other words...we have the real thing called the U.S. Federal Government, and a mirrored operation by quasi U.S. Federal Government privatized agencies who have been clothed with Federal Powers..but, are in fact not federal at all but Private Agencies which in fact belongs to PRIVATE CORPORATIONS/COMPANIES & INDIVIDUALS. Don't believe it!? Go back and check out Executive Order 12803 "PRIVATIZATION" and take a look at what was sold off to private individuals, corporations/companies etc., and TAX PAYERS ARE STILL PAYING TAX'S TO THESE "PRIVATE ENTITIES?!"

These PRIVATE ENTITIES are the ones bribing your Congressman, your Senator, your Governor and the rest of the BBC (Billionaire Boys Club) members..to DESTROY THE CONSTITUTION & BILL OF RIGHTS under "Treaty's" international agreements other than treaties...and using the VIth Amendment to protect their RUMPS from We, the People by controlling Judges on the Bench and thereby Controlling the Laws in the Courts of We,the People.

I keep remembering what Russell said on November 17, 1993.. "When the American People wake up and realize what the Feds have done to them; I would not want to be----because the people will hunt them down, give them a fair trial, and hang them on the capital steps.."

The statement was made Nov. 17, 1993. 1991 Bush authorized JAMES BAKER III to use "gold collateral" (U.S. Debt) which he had no Duly Constituted Authority to use, nor did he have the OWNERS PERMISSION to use the gold collateral which ultimately brought down the German, French, Japanese, English, Russian etc Banks. The aba's account numbers etc can be found in the Texas Two Step articles posted at
 link to www.theantechamber.net

What do you know about the history of this ongoing nightmare of Criminal Fraud at the Highest Levels of Government?!

1856. The Guano Act was passed by Act of Congress. 157 years later it becomes necessary to resurrect the 143 year old law The U.S. House and Senate are attempting to impose to validate and/or legitimize this 'alleged' government shutdown which is actually run by Non Governmental Offices i.e., the Antideficiency Act, passed by Congress in 1870.

It is believed; NONE of this would never been exposed had the duly constituted, outstanding, primary creditor not challenged J.P. MORGANS COLLATERAL BASE.
author: V.K. Durham e-mail:e-mail:  V.K.Durham@comcast.net

time for the truth about jp morgan's base collateral which has been challenged putting five of the biggest banks in the united states in deep pucky

By: V.K. Durham, CEO, Durham Holding Trust, Tias 12087 It appears the $15 Billion Dollars in Gold Collateral to Investigate and Prosecute those involved in my husbands murder and the attempt to destroy the U.S. Treasury.. is finally getting the job done. Perhaps these investigations will turn up those 100's of Bank Accounts in UBS in my name and my late husbands name, but we are not the Signatory's on those accounts which are used to "Finance Black Ops".. Perhaps we will also find out where the 2003 $6.5 Trillion Dollar U.S. DEBT SWAP-DEBT CONVERSION PAYMENT WENT.

Things are beginning to be interesting.. Attempts by former Financial Advisor and former associate of my murdered husband sort of have the idea they are going to "put the Trust and Corporate Officers/Trustees in a hostile mental attitude against the CEO/Trustor/Sole Signatory and "overthrow" the Trust's and Corporations by destruction of those very records sent to me by OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE in regards to an investigation they themselves were conducting in regards to the two $120 Billion Dollar "Unauthorized" Prime Bank incident which is defined, parties named, accounts recorded in  http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/TexasTwoStep7.html

Which! Incidentally is the reason that particular Wing of the Pentagon was hit on 9/11.. as a continium of destruction of 'paper trails' involved with Cantor Fitzgerald, Goldman Sachs, Rubin, Bush, Greenspan etal. In regards to the Tape Recordings, those were duplicated by Interpol, Patrick Fitzgerald, ONI and the rest of the alpha bet soup groups.. Over 1,000 pages were faxed to INTERPOL..

The upgraded amendments are amended to particularly point out amended to read [ quote]
Antideficiency Act Background

Federal employees who violate the Antideficiency Act are subject to two types of sanctions: administrative and penal. Employees may be subject to appropriate administrative discipline including, when circumstances warrant, suspension from duty without pay or removal from office. In addition, employees may also be subject to fines, imprisonment, or both. [end quote].

This does not include the Public at Large! It is most specific in identifying Federal employees such as US Corporate House and Senate Members, including members of the Executive Branch such as Council on Foreign Relations, and those agencies sold off/privatized by G.H.W. Bush's 1992 Executive Order 12803.

As President Harry S. Truman stated "The Buck stops here!"

The Antideficiency Act prohibits federal employees from

making or authorizing an expenditure from, or creating or authorizing an obligation under, any appropriation or fund in excess of the amount available in the appropriation or fund unless authorized by law. 31 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1)(A).
involving the government in any obligation to pay money before funds have been appropriated for that purpose, unless otherwise allowed by law. 31 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1)(B).
accepting voluntary services for the United States, or employing personal services not authorized by law, except in cases of emergency involving the safety of human life or the protection of property. 31 U.S.C. 1342.
making obligations or expenditures in excess of an apportionment or reapportionment, or in excess of the amount permitted by agency regulations. 31 U.S.C. 1517(a).

Federal employees who violate the Antideficiency Act are subject to two types of sanctions: administrative and penal. Employees may be subject to appropriate administrative discipline including, when circumstances warrant, suspension from duty without pay or removal from office. In addition, employees may also be subject to fines, imprisonment, or both.
Reporting Requirements

Once it is determined that there has been a violation of 31 U.S.C. 1341(a), 1342, or 1517(a), the agency head "shall report immediately to the President and Congress all relevant facts and a statement of actions taken." 31 U.S.C. 1351, 1517(b). The reports are to be signed by the agency head. The report to the President is to be forwarded through the Director of OMB. In addition, the heads of executive branch agencies and the Mayor of the District of Columbia shall also transmit "[a] copy of each report . . . to the Comptroller General on the same date the report is transmitted to the President and Congress." 31 U.S.C. 1351, 1517(b), as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Pub. L. No. 108-447, div. G, title II, 1401, 118 Stat. 2809, 3192 (Dec. 8, 2004).

OMB has issued further instructions on preparing the reports, which may be found in OMB Circular No. A-11, Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget, 145 (June 21, 2005). The report is to include all pertinent facts and a statement of all actions taken to address and correct the Antideficiency Act violation (such as administrative discipline imposed, referral to the Justice Department where appropriate, and new safeguards imposed). An agency also should include a request for a supplemental or deficiency appropriation when needed.

What if GAO uncovers a violation but the agency thinks GAO is wrong? The agency must still make the required reports, and must include an explanation of its disagreement.

As the Edge Act of December 24, 1919 progressed into the fields of International Banking and Financing those who coerced

143-year-old law stirs fears during shutdown

The law is the Antideficiency Act, passed by Congress in 1870 (and amended several times), which prohibits the government from incurring any monetary obligation for which the Congress has not appropriated funds.

In shutting down the government, most memos cite the law as the reason. The Government Accountability Office says employees who violate the Antideficiency Act may be subject to disciplinary action, suspension and even "fines, imprisonment, or both."
In the absence of "the original text on the Antideficiency Act of 1870, we must review the Original Purpose and Intent of said Act of 1870.

Records of the Committee on Appropriations, 1867-1968 (391 ft.)

Sen. Henry B. Anthony, RI
Sen. Henry B. Anthony, RI (Mathew Brady Studio), Records of the Office of the Chief Signal Officer (U.S. Army) from NARA's Online Catalog.

3.1 The Committee on Appropriations was created on March 6, 1867, when the Senate agreed to a resolution offered by Henry B. Anthony of Rhode Island that proposed such a committee in order "to divide the onerous labors of the Finance Committee with another...."

3.2 Appropriating Federal funds, in tandem with raising revenue, is one of the basic constitutional responsibilities of the Congress. All bills raising revenue and many appropriation bills originate in the House of Representatives, but the Senate has used its power to amend money bills to initiate its own fiscal programs.

3.3 Appropriation bills for the first 14 Congresses were referred to select committees that expired after they issued reports. Usually a single general appropriation bill for the operation of the Government was passed, although in a few instances appropriations for specific purposes, some even specifying the source of revenue to pay for the appropriation, were approved. In December 1816, 11 standing legislative committees, including the Committee on Finance, were created. The Senate Finance Committee was responsible for reporting both revenue and appropriation bills until the 40th Congress, when the Senate decided--partly because the Civil War brought on $1 billion in expenditures for 1865 and over $100 million in interest on the national debt, and partly for partisan reasons--to assign appropriation bills to the new Committee on Appropriations. The Finance Committee continued to deal with revenue.

3.4 Between 1867 and 1968, the Senate Appropriations Committee's power over expenditures fluctuated. Control of executive agency expenditures was a constant problem for Congress. In 1870, the Anti-Deficiency Act was passed, which provided that agencies could not expend more money than was provided by Congress. While this act is considered to be a legislative landmark, the Attorney General's interpretation of the law nullified much of its intent.

3.5 The committee grew in both size and power until 1899, when the Senate rules were modified to transfer jurisdiction of many appropriation bills to the appropriate legislative committees. Following this rule change, the Appropriations Committee retained control of only deficiency, diplomatic and consular, District of Columbia, fortifications, legislative, and sundry civil appropriation bills.

Additional Information

For more information on the Antideficiency Act purpose, history, and requirements see Chapter 6, Availability of Appropriations: Amount

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law: Third Edition, Volume II
GAO-06-382SP, February 1, 2006
Summary (HTML) Full Report (PDF, 727 pages)

Do you know your history? What happened in 1899? The U.S. House and Senate pass The Sherman Anti-Trust Law and Clayton Act Sect. 8 "monopolies" Law. England passed companion Acts i.e., Anti Corruption Act to act in concert with the U.S. Acts of Congress.

Do you know your history about the coercion going on between Wall Street, the White House and U.S. House of Representatives that brought this all about?

1856. The Guano Act was passed by Act of Congress.

Not many today know what "Guano-Manuevo" is. This is NITRATES which enriched the soils of the Southern Cotton Producers prior to the American Civil War, the Cotton Producers of the United States out produced those of England's Egyptian Fields.
England lost 7 million pounds sterling due to the GUANO-MANUEVO-NITRATES brought up from Peru and other Latin American countries at that time.

England, France and Germany were eagerly grabbing up the Latin American Contracts on the Manuevo-Guano-Nitrates. Also, along came W.R. GRACE, J.P. MORGAN and the English Rothschild Banking in those years of 1870 and 1872.

W.R. Grace became the WAREHOUSE-MAN in control over the Peruvian Manuevo-Guano. Peru was the major product shipper.
W.R. GRACE, J.P. MORGAN and THE ENGLISH ROTHSCHILD BANKING, enticed Peru to sell their product in England on the London Exchange, banking with The Bank of England.

W.R. GRACE as the Government Warehouse-Man in control over all the MANUEVO-GUANO shipments, allowed "short billing of the bills of lading." As an example; The Peruvian Government was reported "only 5 tons of product had been shipped" when actually 50,000 tons were shipped. The "short billing of the bills of laden" made it an impossibility for Peru to pay her creditors for those debts of 1870 and 1872.

April 27, 1875. The Peruvian Legislature in one last desperate attempt to "save her sovereignty" authorized by invocation of the Peruvian Constitution of 1862, to enter into "The one time only, BONUS 3392-181 Commodity Contract, now owned by THE DURHAM (INTL. LTD;) HOLDING TRUST (TIAS 12087). (go back and read "John N. Perry vs the U.S. Debt.")

The War of the Pacific broke out over this "short billing of the bills of lading."

Around 1894, W.R. Grace, J.P. Morgan and the English Rothschild Banking, forced a bankruptcy on Peru, which gave a "60 year receivership" on all the natural resources and minerals of Peru.

The United States had proceeded to spread out throughout the Pacific and Atlantic Ocean looking for more NITRATES called Manuevo-Guano, using the 1856 Guano Act as the almighty Right to "make protectorates" out of every island, country having one BIRD DROPPING of these Manueo-Guano Nitrates.

The English TRIPOD of the W.R. GRACE, J.P. MORGAN and ENGLISH ROTHSCHILD BANKING forcement of Bankruptcy, cause the U.S. to "assume" the 1875 DEBT sold in New York, New York, U.S.A. May 1, 1875 (the one time only BONUS 3392-181).

Pursuant to Treaties with Peru; The U.S. Federal Government and this "assumption by trade and commerce agreements" was done through the U.S. Department of State and U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.

W.R. Grace had alleged he "purchased all the bond debt from 1870 and 1872"..

Interestingly, the U.S. after the assumption.. lost track of the 1875 LEGISLATIVE AUTHORIZED COMMODITY CONTRACT HOLDER of BONUS 3392-181. Peru also lost track as her great libraries were burned and government documents were hauled off to Chile.

Some of the bond holders tried to collect. The U.S. hemmed and hawed, going through great measures of DEBT AVOIDANCE giving various excuses such as "We are not set up as England, France and Germany to operate in this foreign commerce & trade in regards to our Banking Systems."

This is where it gets interesting. The U.S. Fed. Govt. "does not know how to conduct Banking in regards to "Commerce & Trade"..(once debt payments were being demanded), and the old boys that royally screwed PERU "Just so happen to have the know how needed by the U.S. Federal Govt.; To OPERATE A FOREIGN BANKING SYSTEM"?

Enters the Foreign Banking Act. December 24, 1919.

In this alleged Foreign Banking Act of December 24, 1919 two things happened which are relevant to BONUS 3392-181 GOLD BEARING COMMODITY CONTRACT;

1. Under the "Foreign Banking Facilities"..-- [quote]
"As our foreign commerce grew, the nation began to realize its handicap in the matter of foreign banking. Foreign nations have their own methods of transacting business, their own and ucstomary terms of credit and payments, and our competitors in the foreign field had long been used to doing business with these nations in their own way.
The South American trade, for example, has been used to buying long credits, from six to twelve months, and France England and Germany as well as the other nations of Europe have been taking the lion's share of this trade on these terms.
To facilitate the handling and financing of the great volume of such foreign business, these countries extended their banking facilities to these foreign fields, and with the result that our own exporters were at a decided disadvantage, losing their competitors the trade that was not in a position OR WILLING to make payment in New York against bills of lading." [end quote]

BONUS 3392-181 the Commodity Contract of April 27, 1875, Sold in New York, New York May 1, 1875, Contracting for MANUEVO-GUANO Nitrates shipped via "Bills of Lading."

The United States had only BEEN IN BANKING as a NATION since 1876? The year she pleaded INSANITY of KNOWLEDGE OF COMMERCIAL BANKING was 1916 and 1919? *anyone ready for a "break" in this having the "wool pulled over your eyes?"

The United States being "totally ignorant" in the business of Trade and Commerce shifts the DEBT "BURDEN" OWED ON BONUS 3392-181 over to THOSE "NEW COMERS" INVOLVED IN THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT and the AMENDMENT to the Federal Reserve Act i.e., The Foreign Banking Act of December 24, 1919?

Anyone figured out by this time; "Who has the pea in this SHELL GAME?"

This "Shell Game" does not stop here.. it gets more interesting in reading the FOREIGN BANKING ACT of December 24, 1919. For something that was only to remain in effect for "20 years".. We have SHELL GAMES UP THE GIGI!

Read this...this is really a "Shell Game" designed to destroy the National Sovereignty of the Government of the United States by Federal Reserve rules and regulations, which were left at libitum by the Congress of the "first shell game."

Abuse of Act of Congress known as: The Foreign Banking Act, Dec. 24, 1919. Sec. 43 & Sec. 25. Abuse of Powers by The Federal Reserve Banking System "Trust", empowered by said Act of Congress(?)

(Law, Banking and Business. Copyright, 1918, by THE JOHN A. HERTEL CO., Copyright 1921 by THE JOHN A . HERTAL CO.) can be read  http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/ForeignBankingAct.html

3.6 Between 1900 and 1921, Congress, and the Appropriations Committee in particular, grappled with such problems as unbalanced budgets and "coercive deficiencies," by which an executive agency spent its funds early in the fiscal year and forced Congress to approve its request for a deficiency appropriation or face the shutdown of the agency. Several attempts to reform the system of Government expenditures led to the passage of the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, which established the Bureau of the Budget and the General Accounting Office, the latter serving as Congress' auditor, totally independent of the executive branch. The following year, the Senate revised its rules relating to the jurisdiction over appropriation bills by reestablishing the authority of the committee over all such bills. The committee then established subcommittees similar to those of the House Appropriations Committee. source  http://www.archives.gov/legislative/guide/senate/chapter-03.html#1867


This has most certainly been an 'unusual' year with the 'planned' collapse of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Fed. R. Banking Systems and the "taking of the global banking, financing and economics hostage with fabricated-forged financial instruments backed only by the forged signature of a murdered man.

This HEDGE FUND (Counterfeit Bonus Certificate 3392-181) OCTOBER SURPRISE collapse of the U.S. Treasury & U.S. Fed. R. Banking Systems was planned by the Council on Foreign Relations during the Clinton Administration with the 'authorizing of the agreement' by Lawrence Sommers, Former Goldman Sachs Rubin Sec. of Treasury currently with CITIGROUP-CitiBank, and Russell Munk of the U.S. Treasury, and Alan Greenspan of the U.S. Fed. R. These are the individuals who are being blackmailed in the PUBLIC NOTICE at
 http://www.theantechamber.net/VkDocuments/DocGroupG/Gpage4.html .

CLINTON'S HEDGE FUND & JUNK BOND dealer Mark Rich along with the investigations involving CitiGroup's CITI-BANK dealings with CHINA, JAPAN etc has caused quite a furor within THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES who have, along with Russia, China, Cuba etc decided "They can no longer allow their Central Banks to deal with the U.S. Banking Systems of the U.S. Fed. Government due to the CORRUPTION & ORGANIZED CRIME throughout the entire system which is interfering with, and attempting to take over THE INFRA STRUCTURES of the NATIONS involved in the OAS."

Its possible; CENTRAL BANKS refusing to deal with U.S. DOLLAR...knowing many of them were on a SNIPE HUNT holding the BAG on close to $400 Trillion Dollars in what they thought were U.S. DEBT DERIVATIVES , HEDGE FUNDS along with a few JUNK BONDS... Remember; THIS ALL WAS AUTHORIZED BY THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION & THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS1997-98.

U.S. Security Exchange Commission Chairman William Donaldson (Bloomberg.com) won his fight to extend SEC oversight to hedge funds, passing regulations opposed by the $866 billion industry and his two Republican commissioners.

The SEC Orders Hedge Funds to Register (Oct. 26, 04) under a new Rule approved on Tuesday in a 3-2 vote by the market-policing agency.

This should effectively STOP the OCTOBER SURPRISE by acknowledging this alleged external U.S. DEBT OF $400 TRILLION DOLLARS is 98% FRAUD fabricated back in 1997-98 in the GUILARMI HOTEL in Makita Philippines. What was intended by the
or  http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&num=50&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859- 1&BtnG=Google+Search&as_epq=BILLIONAIRE+BOYS+CLUB
(TYPED IN) "BILLIONAIRE BOYS CLUB" and see what you get. The CLINTON DEMOCRATS and COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS fully intended to take down the U.S. Banking and the Presidency via the JUNK BONDS & HEDGE FUNDS in CHINA'S BANKING should be successfully neutralized or we are hoping this is the instance, and further explained in the 285 page FBI investigation papers recently exposed on

(  http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=57877
which can be also accessed at
article by PRAVDASEEKER Tuesday, 26, October 04.

Can we be assured the OCTOBER SURPRISE IS ABORTED? I can only say at this time: Its going to be nip and tuck.
Thanks to the men and women and Little Fox's at globemaster for "monitoring" my phones and computers. Hopefully WE GOT THE JOB DONE.

V.K. Durham, CEO



(read:  http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/AbusingTheCodeOfSilence.html and listen to both recordings)
By: V.K. Durham

xPimKOgMfvi 06.Apr.2014 06:45

HqtSOpdIwzFK john@hotmail.com