science and religion
author: m concoyle
The following use of language is outside of the language structure used by the propaganda system for both academic and public discourse about science and religion, where the usual context of the language of the propaganda system is a pathetic excuse for intellectual discourse.
Thus, buttons in the minds of everyone will be pushed in a negative manner, by reading this paper, for all who have previously entered into such discussions concerning either science or religion.
See m concoyle at scribd.com ie put in "websitereference" m concoyle

Nonetheless new ideas need to be expressed, even though everyone believes in a childish viewpoint concerning rationality, where, supposedly, intellectuals only deal with absolute truths, or they only deal with a consensus, where science should be exactly the opposite of a consensus. Namely, science needs to challenge authority at every turn, and new ideas need to always be considered, especially, since (for example) the spectra of atoms with more that 4components, eg a nucleus and some electrons, cannot be found to sufficient precision by direct calculation by using the laws of quantum physics etc, etc, eg similarly in regard to identifying the spectra of general nuclei to sufficient precision, etc. etc.
It is materialism, and the math structures associated to materialism, which are not capable of identifying the cause of the observed stable properties of many, fundamental, material systems. Yet, it is the model of particlecollisions in a context of materialism which both defines modern physics, and is the basis for nuclear weapons technology. This structure for knowledge exists because these are the wishes of the rulingclass. Yet, the failures, of such a model for knowledge, are the causes of the social collapse, due to not enough practical creative expansion, in turn, due to the act of constraining knowledge and restricting its relation to practical creativity.
See m concoyle at scribd.com ie put in "websitereference" m concoyle
However, this short discussion depends on a new math construct for "science" where a model for both stable material systems and living systems are based on these systems being stable shapes, which can be of various dimensional types, so that these new types of models of material systems possess stable spectralorbital properties which allow the stable spectral properties of these systems to be determinable to sufficient precision, and it will show that this new math construct for "science" (where science is a quantitative and measurable descriptive language, which provides a model for interpreting the world's experiences) is a language which transcends the categories and stereotypicalbeliefs concerning both science (ie materialism) and religion (the spirit (whatever the spirit is?)), a separation of subjectcontent which the propaganda system tries so desperately to instill into the culture, where its success at this time (2013) is phenomenal. And thus, the very limited range of thought about these topics within the culture.
The material events we experience appear to remain consistent with the idea of materialism, since the appearances determined by close (or nearby) events, ie the construct of (local) convergence, do remain within the materialcontaining metricspace, ie the material containing metricspace has an openclosed topology, but the stable and/or functioning properties of both material systems and living systems (as well as math operators) cannot be understood without reference to a higherdimensional math structures (ie the observed, stable properties of many fundamental material systems cannot be described, in a valid manner, based only on the idea of materialism), and having a relation between sets of discontinuous structures requires that the operators, which mediate between the dimensional levels, be discrete, in regard to both discrete timeintervals and between discontinuously separated different dimensional shapes (where these shapes model different metricspaces).
The existence of stable patterns, which can be consistently identified in one's own experience, ie can be measured, is the math context which is equivalent to (or can contain, without contradiction) a passivecreator model (of religion), but this new math context... ,
where in the new alternative viewpoint, math constructs are associated to sets of discrete hyperbolic shapes, defined in a manydimensional context, where there are many metricfunction "signatures" (see below) for the different dimensional levels (where odddimensional levels (or shapes) are contained in evendimensional levels, and viseversa)
... , also allows (or must allow) for an set of energygenerating, and selfreflective, stable geometric patterns to exist in various highdimensions, including the 3dimensional level, ie a 3dimensional hyperbolic metricspace, modeled as a stable discrete hyperbolic shape, which, in turn, is contained in a 4dimensional hyperbolic metricspace, where the related metricfunction has a "signature" related to the coordinate space R(4,2) (see below).
This is an activecreator model of existence, but the creator is, actually, a lifeform, in fact, it could be ourselves.
The new alternative ideas are about a measurable descriptive context, which depends on a math model of a (local) measuringconstruct, ie a derivative, in turn, based on a new discrete structure for the (local) operators, where these discrete operators are a part of (or contained in) a "manydimensional and manytimeinterval" context, where the multiplicity of timeintervals, which are (or can be) associated to various metricspaces, and are also associated to different "signature" metricfunctions, eg R(4,2) has 4space dimensions and 2temporal dimensions [and whose metricfunction "signature" is, 42=2]. Thus this model of existence can be about a 3dimensional discrete hyperbolic shape, contained in four spatial dimensions... ,
(a shape of oddgenus, ie oddnumber of holes in its shape, eg a doughnut (or torus) has onehole in its shape),
... , which can generate its own energy (due to a charge imbalance, due, in turn, to the shape's geometry), and it is contained in a 4dimensional hyperbolic metricspace, and this accounts for the interest in the R(4,2) metricspace, which has "two dimensions of time" associated to itself, one timedimension associated to regular material motions and the other timedimension associated to the motions of energygenerating "materials."
In other words, the highdimensional energygenerating shapes, associated to certain odddimensional discrete hyperbolic shapes (whose genus are odd)... .,
and defined on generalized nonpositive constant curvature metricspaces, where the metricfunctions must have constant coefficients (so as to be relatable to a "continuously commutative everywhere shape" [ie a circlespace shape])
... ., is the natural context for both science and religion, where religion is about practical creativity of lifeforms which fit within the true math containment structure (or math model) for existence, ie manydimensional and very deeply associated to the very stable discrete hyperbolic shapes, where these stable shapes are needed so as to be able to account for the stable spectral properties of quantum systems, so that the spectra of these systems can be identified to sufficient precision.
These stable shapes, placed in a metricinvariant containment space, provide models both for stable material systems and the higherdimensional structures which allow living, energygenerating, shapes to exist. Thus this new math construct allows for (or provides) a model for life, whose living functions come from a set of stable shapes which exists in higherdimensions than the dimensions, which the idea of materialism define.
If the "creationists" want a math model which includes ideas about stability, measurability, and control, and of a "repeatably measurable" descriptive context... ,
ie a model of our experience, and which is associated to higherdimensions, ie transcending the idea of materialism, ie being able to mathematically model an existence which is beyond the material world
... , then they need to consider these math patterns very carefully.
This math construct models "the spirit" as an actual existing structure in a higherdimensional space, where "spirit" now means; existence in higherdimensions than the dimensions of material containment (where material containment is usually defined by the idea of materialism).
But the idea of a "deepcreator" is not external, rather it is within each and everyone of us.
This is also why law should be based on equality, and not based on property rights and minority rule.
Basically people become used to the "abuse by society," and its subjective hierarchy, because they like the public buildings and the sewer systems which their emperors built (eg in a similar manner as the Romans), but such (civic) creativity does not need to be attached to the idea of an oppressive emperor (or, today, a modern big banker, or oilman, or weapons supplier).

contribute to this article
add comment to discussion
view discussion from this article
