portland independent media center  
images audio video
composted article reporting global

alternative media | environment

CLIMATEGATE: A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY (UPDATED FOR 2013)

Scientists who bet their reputations on the global warming craze are trying to explain their way out of this mess. Some, unable to admit their fraud, have gone as far as to claim that global warming causes cold weather.
CLIMATEGATE: A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY (UPDATED FOR 2013)
by Michael Rivero
In late January 2013, CNN admitted on-air that temperature across the United States were ten to twenty degrees colder than average.

Scientists who bet their reputations on the global warming craze are trying to explain their way out of this mess. Some, unable to admit their fraud, have gone as far as to claim that global warming causes cold weather.

This stands in direct contrast to the claims made by these same scientists back in 2000 that snow would be a thing of the past. Indeed, Al Gore himself repeated the claim that snow would be a thing of the past in 2009!

Here is a reminder of what snow looks like for those who have forgotten, taken mid-January near Moscow, during the harshest winter in a century.
NASA reports that we are seeing a "mini-Maunder" event, a repeat of the "Maunder Minimum"; an observed decrease in solar activity which triggered the "Litte Ice Age" that chilled Europe from the mid 1300s to the mid 1800s..

You are witness to one of the greatest frauds perpetrated on the people of planet Earth, to trick them out of their money and into obedience under the guise of the fight against Human-Caused Global Warming (now rebranded "Human Caused Climate Change" to explain away the icicles we were told were not going to happen). The global warming scare was concoted out of outright lies, purchased science, and scare mongering to trick you ionto being willing to pay carbon taxes to solve a non-existent crisis you were told was all your fault. And, of course, to lull you into accepting the dicates of a glogal government that needed to save the Earth from you icky-poo human beings.

And it was all a lie. Here is how it all happened.

1: Climategate: The Mother of All Deceptions
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -- H.L. Mencken (1918)

"Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have."
-- Richard Salent, Former President CBS News.

The recent exposures of fraud coming from the Hadley Climate Research Unit, then followed by similar exposures at New Zealand's NWIA, Australia's climate center, NOAA, the Climategate emails, and now Climategate 2.0, have only confirmed the doubts arising from the obviously NON-scientific methods employed by the Anthropogenic Global Warming supporters, hereinafter called the "Global Warming Cult". I call them a cult because of the abandonment of scientific method by many of the acolytes, together with a recent British Court decision that declared belief in Global Warming was accorded the status of a religion.

Human Caused Global Warming is not being researched; it is being promoted. Al Gore and his fellow investors have spent over a hundred million dollars in creating a crisis of human-caused global warming out of (quite literally) thin air. They are not doing this out of the goodness of their hearts. They expect to reap billions in profits from the trading of Carbon Credits, a "license to pollute" available for a price and subject to brokerage fees. One of the people Al Gore relied on to create this scheme was Ken Lay, late of ENRON, aka the Crooked "E". Al Gore plans to use Carbon Dioxide to do to the world what Ken Lay did to California using electricity; loot the people!

Coincident with the desire to reap huge profits from the general population of the world is the agenda to promote a global government. Currently, the push for a global government rests on three pillars, Global Warming is one of them, leading to a surrendering of national sovereignty attempted at the Copenhagen Conference December 7th, 2009 (but temporarily delayed when the conference was hit with a major blizzard). The other two pillars exploited to create the "need" for a global government are a global swine-flu pandemic, requiring a global health organization, and a global financial crisis, requiring a global bank. The political power behind this push for global government is immense; enough to win Al Gore an Academy Award and a Nobel Peace Prize for his film, "An Inconvenient Truth", despite a court ruling pointing out the numerous provable lies and distortions in it.

To any real objective observer, the methods employed by the Cult are not those of science and research but of salesmanship and propaganda. Scare tactics are well in evidence. To anyone of an age enough to recall previous scare campaigns, the hue and cry for Anthropogenic Global Warming is reminiscent of "Killer Bees" and Y2K scares of yesteryear.

To put it bluntly, Anthropogenic Global Warming is a load of government-sponsored bovine excrement. Its purpose is to trick you out of money and into obedience. And despite the shrill cries of those who insist that government would never conceive or let along execute such a monstrous fraud upon the people, the fact is that Anthropogenic Global Warming has a very long pedigree of deception behind it.

Here are some examples.

2: Ancient Lies
Ramses and the Hittites

In Egypt, one of the greatest surviving monuments (and source of tourism revenues) is the great temple at Abu Simbel. Built by Ramses II, known as Ramses the Great (by his own admission), the walls at Abu Simbel are carved with a unique style called "sunken relief", a method of artwork that was less expensive than full bas relief and more difficult to erase. And there, depicted in indelible sunken relief cross the walls and pylons of Abu Simbel are scenes of Ramses the Great, victorious in battle against the Hittites at the battle of Kadesh. Immortalized in stone is his victory for all to see. Similar carvings at Abydos and Luxor also show Ramses defeating the Hittites at Kadesh.

Except ...

Ramses the Great didn't defeat anyone at Kadesh. Fed false information by Hittite spies, Ramses led his men into a trap and barely avoided losing his entire army. Ramses was forced to sign a peace treaty with the Hittites (the first non-aggression treaty in history), ending Egypt's expansion into the north.
Ramses, like any head of state, had a huge ego and together with not wishing to appear less than godlike to his population (who were taught that he was a God), Ramses promoted the idea that the battle in Kadesh had been a great victory for Egypt, certain that most Egyptians lacked the means to actually travel to Kadesh and find out for themselves what the truth was. (The Canaanites did find out, and emboldened by Ramses' lack of victory, revolted, thereby ending Egypt's dominion beyond the Sinai.)

There is a motto here. Rulers serve bovine excrement to their own people in order to control them. That is a fact carved in stone for all to see, 3200 years ago. It is no less true today than it was in the time of the pharaohs.

The Donation of Constantine

Prior to the time of Constantine, Kingship was either won in battle or inherited from father to son. There was no specific ceremony upon taking the throne (although one finds records of some very wild parties held in celebration). But in the time of Constantine, the church invented for itself the ritual of coronation, in which the Bishop of Rome prayed over Constantine and then slapped a crown on his head, thereby sending out a clear message that the church claimed responsibility for Constantine 's earthly power and authority.

Following Constantine 's death, a document appeared in which Constantine purportedly donated the imperial regalia of Rome to the church, with the request that it be "loaned" to all future rulers of the Roman Empire . From that day on, the loan took the form of the ritual of coronation, in which the holy oil of anointment created the king, rather than conquest or the bloodline. Coronation added the imprimatur of God's will to the legitimacy of the monarch, and as an inevitable corollary, nobody could ascend to the throne without the permission and blessing of the church.

Except ...

Constantine had not been informed ahead of time of his own coronation and by all accounts was rather shocked and angered by the church's brazen attempt to portray his civil authority as a gift of their religion. As for the donation of Constantine, which literally reshaped the political history of Europe for half a millennium, it was a forgery, most likely written within the Papal offices, to steal for the church the "right" to declare who would or would not be kings of Europe.

There is a motto here. Bovine Excrement is shoveled out of places besides the civil government.

homepage: homepage: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/climategate.php


"CNN admitted on-air that temperature" 03.Mar.2013 13:57

Weather IS NOT Climate

.

I've an easy solution to all this... 03.Mar.2013 15:30

Shaker

Seems the 'bovine experiment' has become an obsession with too many, and the kind of dung exhibited by things like this you can't even burn in the stove to keep warm. It's more like grumpy old men sitting in front of the TV or listening to the radio and trying to win the bitch war. With all the scams in society today, climate in science is hardly the worst, and seeing the nature of science is self-correcting, not of too much concern. But the financial segment of society got involved, and the next thing that you know there are suggestions of a 'carbon tax', an abomination like 'carbon trading' (a disgusting scheme to turn nothing into money; like there aren't enough of such instruments) and then an industrial form of the scheme in 'carbon sequestration'. Well, the scientists finally did get the research money which they couldn't get from even the crazier side of society or some eccentric who pisses in mason jars, and grumpy old men (or trolls; a distinct possibility seeing as the shit is really piling high and none of us own cattle) with nothing to do but don their armor and admire themselves in mirror using what little imagination they have to become Don Quixote get some kind of satisfaction from it all. If we'd have given the scientists a little bit of money to begin with, let them have their tenure and obscure journals with shit smeared on slick paper (Who else can use that stuff to wipe?) everything would be fine and maybe, just maybe, the old men (well, you really don't have to be chronologically old) will see how they're the victims/recipients of the biggest scam ever through their 'investments', insurance, patented prescription drugs, hedge-fund pensions, and places like restaurants who give them a senior discount serving them half the portion at two-third of the normal price.

So, after all that typing and expenditure of great (or not) wit, and at the risk of no one enjoying (maybe) it the solution I propose is that we compost (the common repostitory) this particular post, and call a moritorium on posting of climate articles for a while that don't consist of ONLY links to actual scientific publications (thank god my screen isn't slick paper), not distortions of history or opinions from radio shows. Now, I know I'm going to be criticized for attacking free speech, and normally I could be somewhat sympathetic to that reasoning, but you know, sometimes when the bulls run through town the gutters get clogged. I'd rather they spared the jail crews cleaning that up (I can imagine even they have better things to do) so just keep the bulls off the street. What's discriminatory about that? Just seems good sense, to me.

Global Warming Stopped 16 Years Ago, Met Office Report Reveals 03.Mar.2013 20:24

David Rose

Global warming stopped 16 years ago, Met Office report reveals: MoS got it right about warming... so who are the 'deniers' now?


Last year The Mail on Sunday reported a stunning fact: that global warming had 'paused' for 16 years. The Met Office's own monthly figures showed there had been no statistically significant increase in the world's temperature since 1997.

We were vilified. One Green website in the US said our report was 'utter bilge' that had to be 'exposed and attacked'.

The Met Office issued a press release claiming it was misleading, before quietly admitting a few days later that it was true that the world had not got significantly warmer since 1997 after all. A Guardian columnist wondered how we could be 'punished'.
Pause: Last year The Mail on Sunday reported global warming had 'paused' for 16 years

Pause: Last year The Mail on Sunday reported global warming had 'paused' for 16 years

But then last week, the rest of the media caught up with our report. On Tuesday, news finally broke of a revised Met Office 'decadal forecast', which not only acknowledges the pause, but predicts it will continue at least until 2017. It says world temperatures are likely to stay around 0.43 degrees above the long-term average - as by then they will have done for 20 years.

This is hugely significant. It amounts to an admission that earlier forecasts - which have dictated years of Government policy and will cost tens of billions of pounds - were wrong. They did not, the Met Office now accepts, take sufficient account of 'natural variability' - the effects of phenomena such as ocean temperature cycles - which at least for now are counteracting greenhouse gas warming.


More...

Golden windfall of UK's Green guru: Firm owned by ex-Tory Minister John Gummer connects up wind turbine power - and it paid him £1,750 PER HOUR
Ed Miliband's solar swindle: Cost of green subsidies will add £1 billion to family household bills
MPs say cost of offshore wind farms will add £17bn to YOUR household energy bills

Surely the Met Office would trumpet this important news, as it has done when publishing warnings of imminent temperature rises. But there was no fanfare. Instead, it issued the revised forecast on the 'research' section of its website - on Christmas Eve. It only came to light when it was noticed by an eagle-eyed climate blogger, and then by the Global Warming Policy Foundation, the think-tank headed by Lord Lawson.

Then, rather than reporting the news objectively, Britain's Green Establishment went into denial. Neither The Guardian nor The Independent bothered to report it in their paper editions, although The Independent did later run an editorial saying that the new forecast was merely a trivial 'tweak'. Instead, they luridly reported on the heatwave and raging bushfires in Australia.

One of the curious features of Green journalism is that if it gets unusually cold, this will be dismissed as mere 'weather' of no significance, while a heatwave or violent storm will be seized on as a warning that catastrophic climate change is already here.
Instead of focusing on the news that global warming had halted, other newspapers reported on the heatwave and raging bushfires in Australia

Instead of focusing on the news that global warming had halted, other newspapers reported on the heatwave and raging bushfires in Australia

Where the new forecast was mentioned on the BBC and other websites, experts were marshalled to reassure apocalypse-hungry readers that the end of the world was just as nigh as before. A warming hiatus of a mere 20 years, they said, was nothing.

This would all be faintly humorous, if it wasn't so deadly serious. Back in 2007, when the Labour Government was preparing what became the Climate Change Act, far from being neutral, the Met Office made a blatant attempt to influence political debate.

In a glossy brochure, it revealed it had a 'new system' that could predict the future, by combining analysis of natural variability with long-term trends. The system, it warned, showed that by 2014 'global average temperature is expected to have risen by around 0.3 degrees compared to 2004, and half of the years after 2009 are predicted to be hotter than the current record hot year, 1998'.

It boasted that this showed how the Met Office used 'world-class science to underpin policy'. No doubt some of the MPs who voted for the Act, with its hugely expensive targets to replace fossil energy with 'renewables' such as wind, were swayed by it. Barely five years later, it is clear this forecast was worthless. But the Met Office is unrepentant. 'Climate models do predict periods of little or no warming, or even cooling,' a spokesman told me. Despite the pause, the long-term projection that the world is likely to warm by about three degrees if the proportion of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere doubles was still on course.
Inconvenient truth: The MoS report last October that was vilifed by the Green Establishment

Inconvenient truth: The MoS report last October that was vilifed by the Green Establishment

We all get things wrong, and by definition futurology is a risky business. But behind all this lies something much more pernicious than a revised decadal forecast. The problem is not the difficulty of predicting something as chaotic as the Earth's climate, but the almost Stalinist way the Green Establishment tries to stifle dissent.

There is, for example, the odious term 'denier'. This is applied to anyone who questions the new orthodoxy about global warming. It doesn't matter if one states that yes, CO2 does warm the planet, but the critical issues we need to address are how fast and how much: if one doesn't anticipate catastrophe, one must be vilified, and equated with those who deny the Holocaust.

Yet the real deniers are those who don't just claim that the pause is insignificant, but that it doesn't exist at all. Such deniers also still insist that the 'science is settled'. The truth is that the unexpected pause has triggered a new spate of research, in which many supposed 'consensus' conclusions are being questioned.

Some scientists are revisiting some basic assumptions of climate prediction models, such as the effects of clouds and smoke particles in the atmosphere. They now think that the claim that the warming effect of CO2 is 'amplified' by things such as cloud cover have been seriously exaggerated. In their view, doubling CO2 may only warm the world by 1.5 degrees or so, giving us many more decades to develop lower carbon energy sources.

How have the Green deniers been so successful in concealing such debates?

Partly it is the web of commercial interests that both fund and are sustained by Green climate orthodoxy. But it is also their dissenter-trashing machine.

A day before the revised Met Office forecast broke, US blog site Planet 3.0 awarded me its Golden Horseshoe award for the 'most brazenly damaging and malign bad science of 2013'.'

I'll be clutching it when they burn me at the stake.