portland independent media center  
images audio video
composted article reporting global

alternative media | environment

Time to Jail the Climate Scamsters

It's official. What I was howled down and banned for telling the recent U.N. climate conference in Doha is true. There has been no global warming for 17 years.
SYDNEY, Australia - It's official. What I was howled down and banned for telling the recent U.N. climate conference in Doha is true. There has been no global warming for 17 years.

Rajendra Pachauri, the railroad engineer who heads the U.N.'s accident-prone climate panel, the IPCC, recently admitted this fact here in Australia.

The Hadley/CRU temperature record shows no warming for 18 or 19 years. RSS satellites show none for 23 years. Not one computer model predicted that.

Pachauri said the zero trend would have to persist for 30-40 years before it mattered. Scientists disagree. In 2008 the modelers wrote that more than 14 years without global warming would indicate a "discrepancy" between their predictions and reality. By their own criterion, they have grossly, persistently, profitably exaggerated manmade warming.

The 17-year flatline gives Australia's $180,000-a-year, part-time climate kommissar, Tim Flannery, a problem. In January he crowed that extreme weather like Sydney's recent heatwave had been predicted for decades.

Skeptics, he wailed, continued to ignore the thousands of hot-weather records tumbling worldwide. Yet without statistically significant warming for nigh on two decades, recent extreme weather cannot be blamed on global warming.

Warming that was predicted yesterday but has not happened for up to 23 years until today cannot have caused yesterday's "droughts and flooding rains," now, can it?

Flannery relentlessly gives only one side of the story when it is his duty to give both. He is carefully silent about the thousands of cold-weather records that have also tumbled in recent years - more than 650 this week in the U.S. alone.

The Northern Hemisphere is enduring one of its coldest winters in 100 years. Before the usual suspects try to blame that too on global warming, the IPCC says - unsurprisingly - that warmer weather means less snow.

Sea-ice extent in the Arctic has reached a record high for this time of year, despite a record low last summer. In the Antarctic, sea ice has been increasing for 33 years.

There will be further extreme weather in the coming decades. It will not matter whether the world warms or cools. Extreme weather is not the new normal. It is the old normal - but the new slogan.

The best-kept secret in climate science is that extreme weather, or "tipping points," will be no likelier if the planet warms than if it cools. For the climate behaves as a chaotic object. What mathematicians call "bifurcations" can occur at any time.

We may warm the world this century, but not by much. What is important is not only the embarrassingly long absence of warming but also the large discrepancy between the rate of warming the models predict and the real-world rate.

The IPCC baselessly predicts 3 degrees Celsius manmade warming this century. The warming rate since 1950 has been a third of that. The maximum warming rate over any decade since 1850 was equivalent to less than 2 degrees per century.

No surprise, then, that the IPCC recently gave the lie to Flannery in a special report saying extreme weather cannot yet be attributed to manmade warming. Yet its own errors relentlessly exaggerate both manmade warming and its consequences.

In 1990 the first of its five reports said that from then till now the world would warm at 0.3 of a degree Celsius per decade. Outturn: less than half that.

In 1995 the scientists said five times there was no human influence on temperature and they did not know when it would become detectable. IPCC bureaucrats got a single bad scientist - a one-man "consensus" - to rewrite the report to say the flat opposite.

That year another bad scientist emailed a colleague: "We have to abolish the medieval warm period." His problem was that the Middle Ages were warmer than now. Today's temperatures are normal.

In 2001 the IPCC's "hockey stick" graph duly "abolished" medieval warming. The shank showed little temperature change for 1000 years; the blade showed a sudden spurt in the 20th century, which the IPCC - six times - blamed on us. In 2005 two Canadian scientists proved the graph bogus.

In 2007 the IPCC doctored another graph to pretend manmade warming is accelerating. The Obama administration is using this faked diagram to justify introducing a carbon tax just as the EU/Oz tax collapses.

This year will bring a fifth "Assessment Report." As an expert reviewer I shall try to halt further fraud. It will not be easy. The weevils are at it again. This year's new predictions, backcast eight years to 2005, bizarrely overstate already measured warming and project the exaggerations to 2050, forecasting unrealistically rapid warming.

A senior Australian police officer specializing in organized-crime frauds tells me the pattern of fraud on the part of a handful of climate scientists may yet lead to prosecutions.

When the cell door slams on the first bad scientist, the rest will scuttle for cover. Only then will the climate scare - mankind's strangest and costliest intellectual aberration - be truly over.

Global Warming or Global Governance? Video 1:22:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u81qXOYfKg

Are you scared to question "climate change?" Nevermind record cold tempetures: that's the new warming. We're now at war with "X" - I mean "Y"

homepage: homepage: http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/time-to-jail-the-climate-scamsters/


Oh? 01.Mar.2013 07:32

...

With all that's happening in the world, this is the place that you'd start prosecuting fraud? Comparatively, these are little fish, and few of them, in a big ocean. I noticed the financial people jumped right on this, with their 'carbon trading', just another scam. A whole financial, politcal, business, and military structure awaits your enquiring mind, and this is the best you can do, prosecute some scientists who, in their quest for funding in this screwed up system, will be begging on the streets if what you say is true? Maybe you've just got too much time on your hands...Or somehow get paid to post this crap.

Hot Air 01.Mar.2013 09:35

Den Mark, Vancouver

Maybe it's "lord monckton's" hot air that's melting polar & mountain glaciers.

Getting paid or brainwashed? 01.Mar.2013 09:53

--

I remember a documentary years ago(forget which), that showed most activists defending the second Bush administration were from the middle /upper middle class(contrary to the common assumption they were misinformed working class poor). They would also support the most out transparent propaganda(swift boat veterans anyone?) without batting an eye and work long hours FOR FREE.

These people really believed, from their place of never went a day hungry privilege, that funding social programs was robbing them of rights or something. They were genuinely scared. Most of them calmed down later realising the world didn't end; the few that couldn't get over it went on to join the Tea Party.

The point is, yeah some of this garbage is PR spin paid for by the ultra right(Koch brothers, Tea Party). But some of it is being promoted by brainwashed Alex Jones types who believe in the cause. That's almost more scary because these people either have disconnected from their critical thinking processes, or they're being coerced in some way. This implies the ultra right has taken on not just the surface trappings of a destructive cult, but the actual modus operandi of cults.

Rasmussen: 69% Believe Scientists Have Falsified 01.Mar.2013 11:50

Melissa

Rasmussen: 69% Believe Scientists Have Falsified

Global Warming Research

At least somewhat likely

3 Aug 11 - (Excerpts) - The debate over global warming has intensified in recent weeks after a new NASA study was interpreted by skeptics to reveal that global warming is not man-made.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of American Adults shows that 69% say it's at least somewhat likely that some scientists have falsified research data in order to support their own theories and beliefs, including 40% who say this is Very Likely. Twenty-two percent (22%) don't think it's likely some scientists have falsified global warming data, including just six percent (6%) say it's Not At All Likely. Another 10% are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here .)

Sixty-nine percent! More than two-thirds of American adults don't believe the global warming propaganda! That's good news.

The number of adults who say it's likely scientists have falsified data is up 10 points from December 2009 .

Regardless of the cause of global warming, adults remain divided on whether to take action or not. While 40% believe Americans should take immediate action to stop global warming, 42% suggest waiting a few years.

Out of three scenarios, 30% of Americans say a period of dangerous global warming is likely to occur, while just four percent (4%) say a dangerous ice age is more likely. Half of adults (50%) say something in between is most likely to happen. Another 16% are not sure. These findings are little changed from past surveys.

But only four percent think a dangerous ice age is likely. Guess I still have my work cut out for me.

While a majority of U.S. voters still feel discovering new sources of energy is more important than reducing energy consumption, the number who feel this way has fallen to a new low. Voters also continue to believe there's a conflict between economic growth and environmental protection .

Americans are no more enthusiastic than they were a year ago about buying a car that runs on alternative fuel.

See entire report:
 http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment_energy/ 69_say_it_s_likely_scientists_have_falsified_global_warming_research
Thanks to Craig Adkins and LGL for this link