portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting global

actions & protests | imperialism & war

A Summary of the U.S. Senate's Draconian Gun Control Proposals 2/02/13

gya! study this closely [vkd]
=======================================================================
A Summary of the U.S. Senate's Draconian Gun Control Proposals
February 2, 2013

Source: Lee Rogers, BlacklistedNews.com




It is no secret that the second amendment is currently under attack by a number of authoritarians in Washington DC. Several bills have been introduced in Congress that if passed into law would either dismantle or regulate away the ability of law abiding citizens to conduct transactions involving firearms, ammunition and assorted gun related accessories. These people want you to believe that gun related violence will disappear only if they are able to pass a few gun control laws. If this were true than Mexico which has some of the most restrictive gun laws on the planet would be one of the safest countries in the world. In reality, these restrictive gun laws have empowered Mexican drug cartels to commit countless murders because the average person is unable to defend themselves from people who operate outside of the law. We see the same trend in the United States where gun violence is a much larger problem in areas where there are gun restrictions. Chicago and Washington DC are two good examples of this. When the Supreme Court struck down certain gun control provisions that were imposed in these cities, the murder and gun crime rates actually dropped. Schools which are essentially advertised by the media as gun free zones have now become ripe targets for criminally insane individuals because they know there won't be anyone who will fight back. Anyone who believes that gun control laws will reduce gun violence either has no basic common sense or has an agenda to disarm the people so they can be more easily controlled and potentially enslaved.

Many new gun control bills have already been introduced in the 113th Congress. In this article we are going to focus specifically on the gun control measures that have been introduced in the U.S. Senate. Here is a quick synopsis of each one of those bills.

Senate Bill 22 or the Gun Show Background Check Act of 2013 seeks to regulate gun shows out of existence. The bill would require anyone wishing to hold a gun show to register with the Attorney General and pay a fee that would be later determined by the Attorney General. In other words, it would give the Attorney General the power to shut down any and all gun shows by simply requiring the gun show promoter to pay an outrageous fee to hold a show. The bill also introduces a ridiculous amount of red tape involving criminal background checks, licensing and recordkeeping requirements that regulate firearm transactions at gun shows. It would make it very difficult if not impossible for vendors at gun shows to conduct any sort of business. The bill also gives the Attorney General the power to examine transaction records at gun shows without any sort of probable cause or a warrant.

Senate Bill 33 or the Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act of 2013 would ban the transfer or possession of certain magazines and ammunition feeders that hold over 10 rounds of ammunition. The bill exempts departments and agencies of the federal government, police officers and even retired police officers. So basically this bill says that it is OK for the government to have large capacity magazines but not the average person. In many ways, this bill is actually more about creating a special elite class of people associated with the government than it is about gun control.

Senate Bill 34 or the Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2013 would empower the Attorney General to deny the issuance of firearms as well as deny a firearms or explosives license to anyone who they believe might be a terrorist or they believe is providing aid to a terrorist. Considering that there has been a push to classify Constitutionalists, gun owners, Libertarians and other assorted liberty leaning political groups as terrorists, it should be obvious who this is targeting. The term terrorist is frequently used by both the federal government and the corporate media to demonize political enemies. If this bill were passed into law, the Attorney General would have the power with no due process or proof to declare that someone is a terrorist to prohibit that person from purchasing a firearm.

Senate Bill 35 or the Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act of 2013 would outlaw any online sales of ammunition. It would require face to face purchases of ammunition, licensing of ammunition dealers and require bulk purchases of more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition to be reported to the Attorney General. In other words this bill would make it more difficult for dealers to conduct business and make it more difficult for law abiding people to purchase ammunition.

Senate Bill 54 or the Stop Illegal Trafficking in Firearms Act of 2013 would impose draconian fines and prison sentences on anyone caught engaging in the straw purchase of a firearm. In other words if you buy a firearm for someone who can't obtain a firearm through all of the existing rules and regulations governing the sale of firearms, you could face up to 20 years in prison. Sentences of up to 30 years in prison would be imposed on an individual who buys a gun for someone who uses it to commit an act of violence. In fairness the bill does provide an exception for gifts but regardless of that, if this bill were passed into law it would bring into question and potentially criminalize any number of seemingly innocent transactions between law abiding citizens.

The full text of the following bills have not yet appeared on The Library of Congress website but judging from the titles, it should be pretty clear what their intent is.

Senate Bill 147 would establish minimum federal standards for States that allow the carrying of concealed firearms. It will essentially make it more difficult for people to conceal and carry lawfully. This is unbelievably stupid because it is highly unlikely a criminal is going to go through the effort to try and obtain a license to conceal and carry. As a result, the streets will be more dangerous since there will be fewer law abiding citizens who will conceal and carry.

Senate Bill 150 is the now infamous proposed legislation from California Senator Dianne Feinstein that would outlaw hundreds of weapons that the bill classifies as assault weapons. Journalists and gun rights groups who have had the chance to see the bill have panned the legislation as a political non-starter. Hypocritically the bill would exempt any weapons used by government officials and police officers. In other words the bill openly declares that if you work for the government you are part of a privileged class. This is a continuing theme that we see in a few of these bills.

Senate Bill 174 is a bill designed to restrict sales of ammunition.

Senate Bill 179 is another bill designed to prevent gun trafficking.

All of these bills are illegal and even if they are passed into law they should be thrown out. The second amendment clearly states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Each one of these bills infringes on that right. If these Senators feel so strongly about gun control than perhaps they should craft legislation to remove all armed guards at federal buildings. They should also prohibit bodyguards with weapons from protecting the President and all members of Congress. This will not happen because the individuals who have proposed these bills are hypocritical elitist jerks who should be thrown out of office. In a future article we will take a look at some of the ridiculous gun control bills that have been proposed in the U.S. House of Representatives.

READ MORE GO TO  link to www.blacklistednews.com

(video) Details of the 2013 Assault Weapons Ban 03.Feb.2013 15:16

mac http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUJsaUaQnFo

(8:42)

Wrong 03.Feb.2013 17:22

Garth

You write: "The second amendment clearly states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. "

No it does not. It clearly states "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Why do people always "forget" that first clause? Why would anyone remotely familiar with US history even think the people who wrote the Constitution--largely very wealthy slaveowners (today's 1%) would want anyone running around with a gun? They were scared shitless by Shay's Rebellion and numerous other similar insurrections.

As is, all the powers that be want is your obedience. And as long as we are giving away the other 9 of the Bill of Rights, I suppose they figure letting a bunch of yahoos have guns and think they can take down a drone force or a tank...or just shoot up children in schools, is worth it.

WRONG = 'Garth' : 2nd Amendment 03.Feb.2013 17:42

.

------------------------------------------


In order to argue for or against new laws, we should have an understanding of what is already in place.


------------------------------------------



"If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights and those of their fellow citizens."
-- The Federalist, No. 29 -- Alexander Hamilton


"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. . . Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them."
-- Thoughts On Defensive War, 1775 - Thomas Paine


"What, sir, is the use of militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty. . . Whenever Government means to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise a standing army upon its ruins."
-- Debate, U.S. House of Representatives, August 17, 1789 -- Elbridge Gerry


"The great object is, that every man be armed."
-- Patrick Henry


"That the people have a Right to mass and to bear arms; that a well regulated militia composed of the Body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper natural and safe defense of a free State..."
-- George Mason


"Are we at last brought to such an humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defense? Where is the difference between having our arms under our own possesion and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?"
-- Patrick Henry


"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... O sir, we should have fine times, indeed, if to punish tyrants, it were only sufficient to assemble the people!"
-- Patrick Henry


"No free government was ever founded or ever preserved its liberty, without uniting the characters of the citizen and soldier in those destined for the defense of the state.... Such are a well regulated militia, composed of the freeholders, citizen and husbandman, who take up arms to preserve their property, as individuals, and their rights as freemen."
-- State Gazette (Charleston), September 8, 1788


"While the people have property, arms in their hands, and only a spark of noble spirit, the most corrupt Congress must be mad to form any project of tyranny."
-- Rev. Nicholas Collin, Fayetteville Gazette (N.C.), October 12, 1789


"Another source of power in government is a military force. But this, to be efficient, must be superior to any force that exists among the people, or which they can command; for otherwise this force would be annihilated, on the first exercise of acts of oppression. Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive." -- Noah Webster An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, Philadelphia, 1787


"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; or to raise standing armies, unless necessary for the defense of the United States, or of some one or more of them; or to prevent the people from petitioning, in a peacable and orderly manner, the federal legislature, for a redress of grievances; or to subject the people to unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons, papers or possessions." -- Samuel Adams, Debates of the Massachusetts Convention of 1788


"A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves . . . and include all men capable of bearing arms. . . To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms... The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle."


"... whereas, to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them..."
-- Richard H. Lee, Additional Letters from the Federal Farmer 53, 1788


"... the loyalists in the beginning of the late war, who objected to associating, arming and fighting, in defense of our liberties, because these measures were not constitutional. A free people should always be left... with every possible power to promote their own happiness."
-- Pennsylvania Gazette, April 23, 1788


"God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion.... And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.... The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
-- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787


"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." (Thomas Jefferson Papers p. 334, 1950)




------------------------------------------


I'd like to argue that the Second Amendment covers more than muskets, but the First Amendment doesn't cover computers, so I can't.


------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------

Importation of Machine Guns & "unsporting" semi-autos banned in 1968 by Democrat LBJ.

Most CA NFA "Dangerous Weapon" Permits no longer issued to normal citizens in the late 1960s to very early 1970s by Republican Reagan.

Domestic manufacturing of Machine Guns banned in 1986 by Republican Reagan.

"Sporting" language for semi-auto long gun importation restricted to excluded "military" features in 1989 by Republican HW Bush.

The 1st American ban on military style semi-auto weapons Roberti-Roos in 1989 by Republican George Deukmejian.

Unsoeld/922R the domestic conversion of post 1989 imported long guns to original "unsporting" configuration using foreign made parts banned in 1990 by Republican HW Bush.

"Sporting" language for semi-auto long gun importation further restricted to exclude the capability to accept large capacity military magazines in 1998 by Democrat Clinton.

CA SB-23 further restricts semi-auto weapons in 2000 by Democrat Gray Davis.

Military barrels banned from importation in 2005 by Republican W Bush.

------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------
 link to www.ar15.com

But what most people don't seem to understand is the fact that Anon opposes authoritarian government. This ranges from pure anarchy, up through the anarcho-capitalism, and libertarian ideologies. You will not find "leftist" among them. Leftist are statist. It is natural to expect them to oppose "gun control" since they support extremely limited government, or even no government.

Every law of the state is a gun pointed at someone's head. If you support a law, you must agree with the idea that it is worth enforcing that law, even if it takes killing someone to enforce it. Enforcement of a law, no matter how insignificant the infraction, may result in someone's death. So if you "Ban" something then you believe it is worth sending men with guns to enforce that ban. To kill for that ban. If we spoke plainly about the gun in room, the law, instead of whitewashing it with gentle and civil language, perhaps we wouldn't have so many laws, and so much complexity.

Perhaps people would not turn to government to solve all their problems.

I find it funny that we don't even see government's use of coercive violence as violence. "...with total anarchy, there would be no "none-violent recourse" at our disposal"...government enforcement is a violent recourse. It is violence. Even if you hire other people to do the violence, it is still violence.

I've settle lots of disputes without violence, as I'm sure we all have. People are so brainwashed that they believe legal=moral, and that morality can't exist without hierarchical authority.

Interesting.

------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------



"A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well digested plan is requisite: And their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories, as tend to render them independent on others, for essential, particularly for military supplies."

-- George Washington, First Annual Message to Congress (January 8, 1790)



------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------



"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes .... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."

-- Thomas Jefferson.



------------------------------------------




Scalia in Heller, Pp. 47-54
"None of the Court's precedents forecloses the Court's interpretation. Neither United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 , nor Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252 , refutes the individual-rights interpretation. United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174 , does not limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes."




------------------------------------------



"To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm, except upon his own premises or when on a journey traveling through the country with baggage, or when acting as or in aid of an officer, is an unwarranted restriction upon his constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege."

[Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)]



------------------------------------------


The Very Politically Incorrect Truth About The Second Amendment
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igerQd0dpHY


Garth is Destroyed in TV interview. 03.Feb.2013 18:02

||

>