portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting global

actions & protests | imperialism & war

The Only Way Left to Beat Republican Fanatics: Call Their Bluff and Go Over the Cliff

CALL THEIR BLUFF! MAKE THEM RETURN OUR PROPERTY STOLEN BY EXECUTIVE ORDER 12083.
George Bush: Executive Order 12803 - Infrastructure Privatization
Search Engine provided by the Harry S. Truman Library. ... Citation: George Bush: "Executive Order 12803 - Infrastructure Privatization," April 30, 1992.
Section 1. Definitions. For purposes of this order: (a) "Privatization" means the disposition or transfer of an infrastructure asset, such as by sale or by long-term lease, from a State or local government to a private party.

(b) "Infrastructure asset" means any asset financed in whole or in part by the Federal Government and needed for the functioning of the economy. Examples of such assets include, but are not limited to: roads, tunnels, bridges, electricity supply facilities, mass transit, rail transportation, airports, ports. waterways, water supply facilities, recycling and wastewater
READ THE REST OF THIS "ABUSE OF POWER"  http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=23625 [VKD]
==========================================================================
The Only Way Left to Beat Republican Fanatics: Call Their Bluff and Go Over the Cliff

Wednesday, December 26, 2012


President Obama is cutting his Christmas holiday short, returning to Washington for a last attempt at avoiding the fiscal cliff. But he's running headlong into the Republican strategy of fanaticism.

It's a long-established principle of game theory (see Thomas Schelling's classic 1956 essay in the American Economic Review) that a fanatic who restricts his freedom to avert a disaster puts maximum pressure on his opponent to give ground.

In a game of highway chicken, for example, the driver that can't swerve because he's tied his hands to the steering wheel and chained his foot to the accelerator forces the other to swerve in order to avoid crashing.

The trick is for the first driver to convince the second that he's crazy enough to have committed himself to instant death if the second doesn't act rationally.

House Speaker John Boehner's failure to persuade rank-and-file House Republicans to raise taxes even on millionaires fits the fanatic's strategy exactly. Boehner can now credibly claim he has no choice in the matter - Republican fanatics in the House have tied his hands and manacled his feet so the only way to avoid going over the cliff is for Obama and the Democrats to make more concessions.

The White House's hope of getting the Senate to pass legislation that raises taxes on the wealthy in order to pressure Boehner won't work because the legislation can't possibly get through the House. That's the point: Boehner has demonstrated he has no choice; the fanatics are in charge there.

Obama could decide going over the cliff isn't so bad after all - as long as he and congressional Democrats introduce legislation early in the 2013 that gives a tax cut to the middle class retroactively to January 1st (extending the Bush tax cut to the first $250,000 of income) and restores most spending and Republicans feel compelled to go along.

But with Boehner's hands tied and the fanatics in charge, this gambit becomes far riskier. What if we go over the cliff and House Republicans continue to hold out against any tax increases on the rich while demanding major cuts in Medicare and Social Security?

The path of least resistance is for Obama and the Democrats to offer to keep everything as is, through 2013 - extend all the Bush tax cuts and continue all current spending (lifting the debt limit along the way) - unless or until a "grand bargain" on the budget is agreed to before the end of next year.

This is likely to satisfy enough Republican fanatics to gain a majority in the House. And it would avoid the fiscal cliff, kicking the can down the road and giving everyone more time.

Deficit hawks in both parties won't like it, but that's okay. Unemployment is still way too high and growth too meager to justify trimming the deficit any time soon.

The real problem with this gambit is it doesn't change the game. Even down the road, Boehner's hands will still be tied and the fanatics will remain in charge which will give Republicans the stronger position in negotiations leading to a "grand bargain." Compromise would have to be almost entirely on the Democrats' side.

That's why I'd recommend going over the cliff and forcing the Republicans' hand. It's a risky strategy but it would at least expose the Republican tactic and put public pressure squarely on rank-and-file Republicans, where it belongs.

The fanatics in the GOP have to be held accountable or they'll continue to hold the nation hostage to their extremism. Even if it takes until the 2014 midterms to loosen their hold, the cost is worth it.

Read More  http://robertreich.org/

Yes, but it's not a "bluff" 28.Dec.2012 05:43

Mike Novack

I think you misunderstand the situation somewhat.

None of our representatives are elected nationally. This country is a federation. A member of the House represents his or her district, not the country at large. To think otherwise is to not understand the job description.

Thus there is no GOOD reason to suppose we will be better off following 2014. Consider the following scenario. Suppose that in 52% of the districts THE PEOPLE of that district support the fanatics 55% to 45%. That's just under 29% of the country. Suppose that in the other 48% of the districts the people oppose the fanatics 65% to 35%. The result would be that the fanatics control the House even though the people of the country as a whole oppose them 55% to 45%.

We may be stuck in this mess for a lot longer than you think.

Now why did I say "not a bluff"? You are perhaps confusing being stuck with grand strategy. I'm afraid many of the fanatics also prefer going over the cliff in order to get the cuts in spending that they want never mind that this comes with spending cuts they don't want (the military) and higher taxes on all. THEY might be figuring that by breaking the issues apart they can win back on some while holding firm on others.