Reply to artist and media
author: m concoyle
email: martinconcoyle@hotmail.com
Creativity and precise language determine similar contexts

Artists, intellectuals scientists etc most of you (if not all of you, if you are getting paid as one of these types) follow the accepted authority, but this authority is clearly quite wrong, since technical development is not derived from the highintellectual theories of: quantum physics, general relativity, particlephysics, string theory etc because these are based on either nonlinearity or indefinable randomness and thus are quantitatively inconsistent as well as logically inconsistent since they are built upon an idea of quantitative sets being able to define a "continuum" but this is "too big" of a set.
The prevalent ideas of intellectuals parroting the mathematicians and physical scientists is the idea of indefinable randomness and a notion of never "being sure," apparently in regard to measuring and theorizing, or (more consistent with the language of indefinable randomness) not being able to picture physical phenomenon, yet the supreme representation of the laws of physics by the authorities comes from the exact picture (model) of pointparticles colliding, the picture upon which particlephysics is most dependent for its claims.
To ramble through the high and lows of our civilized "highselves," where the props (the façades) of civilization are created by those who aspire high, but in fact, in so doing this, they attach themselves to (and are funded and supported by) the thieves and "the violent henchmen and protectors" of these thieves,
but the shaman is quite similar to the Buddah, and
the distinction of knowledge is between:
... .a written knowledge...,
along with a measurable description's relation to creativity [Note: One should not hangon to the idea of measurable verification as the main objective of scientific description, since models designed to follow data (as is particlephysics) will necessarily be measurably verified.]
..., and knowledge of the world perceived directly,
wherein the point of life is to "create existence from what we know," but "in this type of creative action" we are all equal freeinquirers, and from the knowledge obtained from precise descriptive constructs (if our knowledge depends on a descriptive language, in which case), we aspire to create and build, and/or in regard to "how deep we perceive" and, subsequently, to realize "how our selves can act (intend)."
Action in the context of the world we "can picture."
To picture, or not to picture, that is the question
A written knowledge requires continual revolution (this is the "true" point of Godel's incompleteness theorem, where a theorem's truth is best judged by how useful it is in a wide range of creative endeavors),
but or Thus,
In civilization, where knowledge is based on (precise) descriptions, all practical creativity is associated to some form of a new language construct,
(an ever changing precise [measurable] language of description)
And this innovative newness results in people making a (new) tradition of the newly emerging practical things... .
So as to stop the revolution... by developing a tradition which depends on the newly created "technology."
Note: An authoritative competitive education system allows such an institution to be captured by the ruling business forces of the society (so that education becomes propaganda), so as to make wageslavery (which depends on fixed traditions of product use) ever more inevitable.
But the revolution's goal (the goal of knowledge) is "to create" existence, itself... .
Newly emerging properties of (or added to) the vast realm of all, which we can experience.
How to liberate the public? with only a few words, which are "putinto the media in an edgewise manner,"
... put into, and placed within, the propaganda machine,... .
which churnsout the rules by which social value is developed... ,
... , the rules and goals (marathon races) which define an elusive value
But ([a value which is not elusive at all, since socialvalue is a very controlled idea], a value controlled by those few, who (also) control the "key" possessions of property which can be (and are) fashioned into equipment, where equipment development is guided by investment, and its associated agenda put forth (usually in a deceptive way) by propaganda... .
... , the media,
(the media is the message, the message of materialcreative control {through delivery of artistic and intellectual product by communication instruments made of material, eg the canvas of the artist, is supplied by a funding process, wherein this process business interests are favored (or more correctlyput, they dominate)})
... , is in control of the rules which define the twosides of value:
High and low
or
Accomplished (excellence) and losers (the inept)
It is assumed that (it is true that) everyone aspires along the same paths established by the propaganda system.
Well it is in this fixed context of conservativeness
(conservatism, a belief in inequality, and in opposition to creativity, which tradition demands)
(of dogmatic authority
{of a measurable, and thus supposedly, a practically useful language or a quantitative epicycle structure
which verifies a quantitative description (construct), a construct which carries the authority of the
society},
and, its relation to unspoken {but wellknown} traditions)
Conservatism is also about, having (controlling) and using material in certain ways,
But the greater creativity of mankind depends on a social context of precise language
in which (wherein) the language of authority needs to be in permanent revolution.
The "liberal" revolutionary,
... is a person who supports equality, and in so doing also supports the creativity of all mankind, equal freeinquiry, and equal assessment (ie no assessment of each person's creative efforts, no one assesses a person's creative efforts other than the creative persons themselves),
... we live on an earth which must be in a conserved balance with itself, thus creativity within the medium of materialcreativity must be controlled and balanced... ,
... , and "all" is owned by everyone equally...
M Ruiz, in the introduction of "The Four Agreements," describes, How
the public (each person) is induced to define (within a propaganda and lifestyle system [of doing things]) the essence of personal value, and an organized valuestructure within which the public also judges the value of others... .,
{and themselves}
(as if they were, themselves, the ownerinvestors)
... in regard to hiring people to build the things that the ownerinvestors want built,
and this does define a demarcation of "true personal worth"
and personal value
ie of a person's worth in society,
in a society owned [and controlled through language] by others (the investors).
In this process we are the harshest judges of ourselves.
Is this because the main idea of society is that we are all unequal?
However,
By having life (people possess) as the mysteries of the creativeheavens, themselves,
But what do "they" create which is outside the scope of the propaganda system? Very little,
instead...
"They" create the stable traditions of "experience" (perceptions defining the context of actions)
(using [finding] practical methods in a fixed existence, or within fixed traditions)
"the marathon"
The myth of an ever toiling Sisyphus [struggling within an imposed narrow context]
or
The exploring and having a "critical idea of knowing" wherein a person is "at ease" (the true), in the context of life?
However, To claim that pointlessness reigns over life's actions... , ... is folly.
(where this belief in pointlessness is based on so called scientific truth, eg materialism and uncertainty (or indefinable randomness), and in regard to a particular {and incorrect} interpretation of Godel's incompleteness theorem, namely, that truth can never be determined, [but, in fact, truth can be determined in a relative way, namely, the validity of an idea is its relation to practical creativity.])
Conjecture: Meaning in language is about the relation language has to practical creativity
The question in both math and science, should be, "What allows for the stability of our experience?"
The answer seems to be discrete geometries.
The uncertainty principle was derived from an attempt to use the function space in order to understand the very stable (and precisely discrete) properties of quantum systems, but using function spaces as a basis for finding the cause of stability has not worked.
Basing stability on the properties of function spaces is about defining math as the study of quantity by using only the properties of quantitative sets, some of these quantitative sets are assumed to define a continuum, so that convergence assures the property of set containment, but this might be defining an illusion, based on a wish
but geometry is also a part of a measurable descriptive language.
Other thought
Religion is based on a belief in some other "stable property of existence" different from chaos and pointlessness... , wherein mankind is defined by their collective violence and selfish actions... , where many of these petty actions are motivated by religion... .
But religion does not provide a precise language to understand stability.
Religion used to be science, but authority of the rulers got in the way
Now
Science is used by business interests, where tradition and authority (guided by a funding process based on selfish interests) still gets in the way
It is in science and math, where both stability and upheaval, need to be organized in the contexts of many (valid, measurable) mathematical choices, eg randomness or stability as the basis for developing math patterns.
And not placed in the hands of overbearing traditional authorities,
Whose authority is based on truths which serve (in the current social order) the as the rules of demarcation of social value (which has come to be captured by business interests).
In fact, Revolution (of language which challenges traditional authority) is to be placed at the centralfocus of established materialism, and the established contexts of creativity which is used by investors... , the established contexts (of word's such as "measuring," and "meaning's relation to building")
(such revolutionary creativity, organized around equality, is not the type of organization of creativity which is of greatest interest to a tradition of "high and low" and aimless toil (marathons of struggle), a system organized by the owners of society)
The explorer does not have to be searching for gold...
(and thus "being a funded activity [thus, validated as being an adult, and real] " )
... , so as to fit into the conservative traditions of value, where survivalandworth are organized around wageslavery.
... . But rather an explorer can be about existence's relation to the life experience (to both perception and intent)
[the earth and heaven of the Taoist I Ching, where we are the magic tortoise, living on air, yet provides gifts "to all" on the earth]
Language needs to be in revolution,
... . a new language which takes one to a measurably descriptive context which demarcates... . and clarifies the distinctions between material and life,(different from how they are usually conceived)... , within a greater (but organized) containing set... ., is a language worth having available to an education system
See below, section on What is math?)
But measuring is not simply about "verifying by measuring" ... ,
(as was the case for both Ptolemy and for today's science and math, which is fundamentally now being based on the quantitatively inconsistent ideas of indefinable randomness, derived from following data from particlecollision patterns, which are, in essence, the methods of complicated structure of epicycles used to follow {or to matchup with} observed data (namely, the particlecollision patterns),
Note: A distinguishable feature may not be (logically) relatable to quantitative sets, due to both the properties of stability and the nature [or construct] of measuring (associating distinguishable features with quantitative sets))
... , rather measuring implies building practical things
or
does it imply building and using intent within a "real" context, which is well outside of traditions?
If so, then such a language would be a valid language to preserve
Indeed
The revolution of thought, requires that we extend ourselves outside traditional, authoritative thought, and the traditional use of precise language.
Art
This is a new and interesting picture of art's abstractions... ., rather than traditional art,
where art is delivered to civilization in a material form... (and thus it is easy to control)... .and turned into a tradition in regard to which authority must guard (protect) ... .for the thieves and thugs who handle (control) the authorities and the artists ... by keeping the context of their authority stable (well within a material based "art and intellect" delivery system, so that filters of "excellence" can be puton what is fed into the delivery system, ie only those who possess merit badges can be delivered to (filtered for) the public [who demand excellence, as the media trains them, as to what has excellence]).
The art of persuasion (or salesmanship)
There are,
Salesmen peddling the (moral, or arbitrary) virtues of supporting excellence, and this means those who are measured...
[in the quantifying math structures of indefinable randomness based on distinguishable properties]
... , to be excellent,
ie intelligent, where what is being measured in the context of the word "intelligence," is the familiarity of (high) culture one possesses,
and in doing this one is entering into...
... ., The merit badge society... icons which identify a product... or they identify an activity which possesses high social value,
The images {icons, illusions} of value and merit within society
[defined by a propagandaeducationmerit system]
Propaganda, and people competing fro merit badges
The militarization of society's management system
Merit is a person who has a meritbadge
ie
One who has achieved
One who has the realization of achieving an activity which is "an icon of social value"
For example,
The CEO merit badge
The electrical engineer merit badge
The rockclimbing merit badge
The academic chemistry merit badge
Electrical engineering is corporate controlled nonsense, it is about hiding knowledge,
A knowledge based on simple technical principles surrounding electrical components in circuits,
Which, if known... , when one is working upon an electric system, in a social institution... , then the technical principles of electric circuits are the rules by which the system is adjusted.
Technicians work on complicated systems, and thus, if competitive winners, and learn to adapt such systems (such circuits), they become the technical experts of electrical engineering
Electrical engineering is corporate controlled baloney
Where certain electric circuits can be used in certain ways
And technicians can be interchanged within the classifications of these circuits, and how these circuits are used, can be adjusted a bit.
The fundamental ideas of electrical engineering were developed by Faraday and Tesla, (of course this cannot be true since ideas which can be used in may ways have many authors) where Tesla conceived of waves and alternating systems, while the basics of waves were simplified by onoff switches, which were developed with TV.
... ... ..The geometry of waves and the shapes of antennas... ..
Electrical engineering has come to be an activity, wherein, one must have merit badges
And then there is "the art of terror" and its relation to the public [as expressed in Machiavelli's "The Prince," a handbook for business men and the rulers of society, {the art of the counterinsurgency}].
The demarcation of the controller and the controlled, the employer and their wageslaves.
This is a central interest to the owners of society, who try to control any discussions which question their social positions. This is all about holding the social forces "at bay," so as to maintain for selfish purposes, their selfish interests.
The high knowledge of
"really good athletes," of
"really good electrical engineers,"
etc.
Are skills needed by the owners of society,
And the highsalaries associated to these skills (the so called highly skilled wageslaves, whose social value depends on a narrow definition of worth)
Is science about practical development, which is best defined as "using available technology to solve other technical problems one encounters in the world of practical building?"
Or is science about revolutions in language built out of new geometric contexts?
Equal freeinquiry is to be related to developing knowledge, which can then be used to create new things.
All aspects of math and science need to be challenged, and alternative systems of thought presented.
The following is the language of both art and practical creativity
The language of math, and measurable, and thus, properties associated to buildablity
The following is the language where meaning and purpose come forth.
It is both expert language, and it is revolutionary language, it carries "within its ideas" a scientific revolution.
Without such a revolution of thought, life is to be trapped in a material world, wherein incompetent investors and their trained (obsessive) experts, are trained to serve the interests of the investors (the wageslave status of the, so called, experts, makes these experts incompetent too... ,
(the investors are the true centers of today's religion, the religion of money, and its associated personality cult, the result of a belief in inequality)
... , and then the oligarchs are safe to define a meaningless hierarchy of selfish violence, and an absurd belief (by science) in materialism.
If one believes the experts, then the owners (of society) can always count on such a "believing person" to be obedient to the owner's interests,
but such a person will always be troubled by the pointlessness of their life,
Wherein such pointlessness, one has purpose only if one aspires and achieves in the context of the material world
(which is claimed to be all about competition for limited resources and limited talent, ie people are not equal, which can be proven, by requiring that people be judged in very narrow categories [which serve the interests of the owners of society])
That is, inequality is "proved" by a circular structure to language and the effects of language on the forces of society.
One finds the comments from the media,
No equations means no math.
or
It is full of equations, which are ununderstandable.
Etc
An individual person from the public always act as if they are the owners of society, unfortunately for themselves, they also adopt the belief system which the propaganda system "requires that they have" (they stay within the authority of the current owners)
So ,anyway,
What is math?
The study of quantity and shape?
(Yes, but an interrelationship of the two ideas)
A quantitative description (construct) based on quantitative sets?
(No, yet this is how it is currently defined, in the sense of operations, or processes)
A quantitative description (construct) based on stable geometric sets?
(Yes, if organized correctly)
The "cubical" simplexes (or rectangular simplexes) are the geometric basis for the stability of quantitative constructs for measurable descriptions, where math constructs are in a context of space, shape, and measuring.
The property of being measurable should imply (not just verifiable, as Ptolemy's ideas were measurably verified, but rather) useable, in new creative contexts, such as, "How Newton's law of force for classical physical systems could always (most often) be used to define a system's differential equation," which if solvable, would provide much useful information about the system, which, in turn, can be used in the new creative context. And if not solvable then it provides limit cycles which may be coupledto within a context of a system which can operate within a context of feedback signals, but this type of "control" is very expensive and unreliable.
The Quantitative structure of a continuum, [needed for describing closeness, or nearness, or convergence etc], does have the shape of a real number line.
But the continuum is "too big" of a set, and its use can lead to patterns which are (might be) neither informative, nor are they useful.
The quantitative structure of sets which solve algebraic equations, is constrained so as to require (or determine) the existence of math patterns, in regard to an equation's properties, depending on the quantitative sets, eg real sets of numbers and solution by radicals, ie the prime factorization of polynomials.
Polynomials are the algebraic constructs which identify the way the quantitative elements of the number system are named, eg powers of "ten."
or
Solutions to polynomials can be placed into the complex numbers and then diagonal matrices [in relation to the degree of the polynomial] (resulting in the commutativity of matrices) are associated to the algebraic and set structure... ,
(the need for a "onetoone and onto" set structure in regard to the existence of inverses of functions and/or operators)
... , of solving various types of equations algebraic and/or differential equations etc. But the geometry of a solution in the complex numbers is not easy to identify, and must be placed in a further (system) context where the information can be interpreted.
The structure for solvability and quantitative consistency for differential equations is even more constrained where these constraints are (for the differential equation to be): linear, separable (11 and onto, or diagonal matrices [of the differential equation] which are commutative), and metricinvariant, for spaces with metricfunctions which have constant coefficients.
The onetoone and onto set structure between a function's domain set and its image set are a necessity for the existence of inverses... ,
(this is equivalent to the property of commutativity of matrices associated to the differential equations, or derivatives which are applied to functions so as to form differential equations...
[where derivatives determine local vector properties, and functions may or may not have vector properties, {where scalar functions require the separable solution to be a product of factors each based on a separable orthogonal coordinate directions}]
... , for globallocal function properties (which are solvable))
... , and this means that a solution function to a (linear) differential equation only exists in a global context, and requires the property of commutativity (or diagonal matrices) for all of the local matrix representations of a physical system's (locally) measurable properties, in the system's global coordinate system.
In regard to differential equations describing the patterns of the measurable properties of material, which is contained in a geometric context (determined by the material's geometric properties), then consider the following... .,
[This is about the newly proposed math context concerning how to describe the properties of material systems.]
... , The tangent directions of the discrete shapes [which compose both the material and the discrete Euclidean shape of its interaction] define differential equations at any point in the Euclidean shape's "natural" coordinate system. Namely, they can be used to create differential 2forms, this is the same math as classical physics, but based on separable shapes different from the sphere (see note, below), the other new part is that the 2forms have the same dimension as the Lie group...,
which allows local transformations of coordinates, ie spatial displacements (in Euclidean space), which are metricinvariant, and being metricinvariant then this allows the math construct to preserve quantitative consistency, ie what one is (thus) describing is in (or remains in) the "mathematical" realm of being both well defined and controllable,
..., and these simple relatable geometries (ie between the 2form geometries and the Lie group geometries) allow the direction of the force (ie the spatial displacement in Euclidean space) to be determined.
These spatial displacements may or may not fit into a metricinvariant structure.
That is, the differential equations could determine either material dynamics which fits into a stable shape, or the dynamics could fit into a (nonlinear) chaotic structure (ie with chaotic material dynamics), and subsequently dissipate.
Most interactions are nonlinear and subsequently dissipate, but now there is a math context within which the stable structures can exist.
This appeal to discrete shapes is a mathematical way in which to getat the property of stability emerging from material interactions.
That is, there are stable orbits when the inertial properties of the orbits of a stable material system fit into the confining structures of discrete Euclidean and hyperbolic shapes.
For example, the center of mass of a dynamic orbit...
[due to material interactions, ie induced by 2forms applied to the positions of a lowdimension discrete hyperbolic shape's distinguished point (ie its position in space)]
... , can be confined to a higherdimensional discrete shape, eg a 1curve (orbit, eg an approximate circle) confined to a 2torus.
By the way, the nonlocal properties of quantum physics proves actionatadistance is true, but this implies the further condition (or means), that Euclidean space is absolute, as Newton thought.
(Note: The local vector structure of the sphere and these discrete shapes [or the tangent directions to the natural coordinates of these shapes] is quite similar, namely, intersecting circles, eg on sphere these would be longitude and latitude circles)
In the context of E Noether's symmetries, which relate spatial displacements to inertial properties, and temporal displacements to properties of energy, {wherein, spatial displacements imply (or describe) inertial properties, while temporal displacements (changes) imply (or describe) the property of (conserved) energy}.
Now consider the interpretation of spacetime, it is the space of energy (and it is also associated to two opposite time directions), while Euclidean space is the space of absolute spatial position and inertial forces, so inertia defines an object's relation to (an absolute) spatial position, while the energy space defines the space wherein stable material systems, which have shapes, are conserved in time.
The 1/r potential representation of a point charge (or point mass), as a position in space, makes no mathematical sense, while the position of the distinguished point of a stable discrete hyperbolic shape can be used to define a position in Euclidean space.
That is, Euclidean space is a bookkeeping structure used to identify the positions of stable energetic shapes, or their distinguished points, ie the distinguished point of a discrete hyperbolic shape is related to the vertices of the shape's associated "cubical" simplexes (which are modedout to form the discrete shape).
On the other hand, there is no time in hyperbolic space, other than the cyclic flows of charge confined to orbits on stable discrete hyperbolic shapes, ie the cyclic structure of flowing charges on discrete hyperbolic shapes.
The acclaimed E=mc^2 is the Taylor expansion of the "time" (or energy) component of (mx, my, mz, mt) when differentiated by time, so as to become (p(x), p(y), p(z), m=E), where the 4th component is associated to Energy due to Noether's symmetries relating time and energy, and where the associated factor, to ensure metricinvariance within spacetime coordinates, is assumed to be associated to (or a factor of) the symbol m.
Equations only mean something if they can be used in the sense of providing information one can use to create in a practical context.
The equations of General Relativity, as well as the equations of particlephysics, and the equations of string theory mean nothing, and quantum physics means very little.
They all imply a belief in materialism.
They are only used as symbols of highvalue in the propaganda war against the public, ie only the big investors are allowed to be practically creative within our "superior" culture, where the rich steal from the culture for their own selfish advantage.
Basically the rich have turned physics into the study of the probabilities of particlecollisions and the relation that this property has to nuclear weapons engineering.
A measurable description needs to be related to some practical (careful) form of creativity, though a "manydimensional and measurable description" may define creativity outside the confines of material creativity.
Inertia is associated to spatial displacements in Euclidean space, while energy is associated to a shape, ie a very stable discrete hyperbolic shape, in hyperbolic space, where hyperbolic 3space is equivalent to 4spacetime.
The types of spatial displacements which also require velocity displacements define mass in the velocity space, ie hyperbolic space, where hyperbolic space is also the space of energy.
Thus mass can be represented as energy due to Noether's displacement math patterns (or symmetries) in either time or space, where these math patterns are framed as invariances of either momentum (x) or energy (t).
Thus one is led to an interpretation, that if the temporal subspace of a metricspace... , eg the R(3,1) subspace structure of spacetime where the temporal subspace is 1dimensional... , is increased in dimension then this would allow for new types of velocities, for new types of materials.
Spatial displacements result from locally measurable properties of force fields, and this construct results in being able to define the local measures of these properties which can be used to define a physical system's differential equation.
While (classically)
The idea of energy is about both a systemcomponent's motion where the system is associated to a global shape (of which the component is a part). In this case "the extrema of action," eg the integral of energy over time, determine the physical system's differential equations.
On the other hand, the new descriptive structure is about a set of local properties related to spatial displacement, in turn, being related to an energetic shape.
In this new context of "shape and spatial displacement" the simple property of resonance is identified as (usually) being responsible for a transition from spatial displacement processes to the formation of a new stable shape, where the resonance is defined in a highdimension containing metricspace composed of discrete hyperbolic shapes so that the containing space, itself, has spectral properties associated to itself, and to all of its various subspaces for all the various dimensional levels.
Furthermore, The new ideas give a cause for the direction of spatial displacement, while Newton could only provide information if he assumed the separable geometric shape of the sphere, in the new description the radial direction of the spherical shape to material interactions in 3space, is caused by the 3sphere shape of the fiber group of R(3,0), and the geometric relation of this groupshape to differential 2forms in space.
In R(4,0) the geometry of the fiber group is the Cartesian product of two 3spheres.
In modern physics there exist conservative forcefields, which allow for the existence of a potential energy term in the energy representation of a physical system, and this existence of an energy representation of a physical system is assumed to be a result of their being no holes in 3space.
But this is not true, rather the holes in 3space are trapped within the closed metricspaces which define the very stable 2dimensional discrete hyperbolic shapes as well as the interaction shape which is a discrete 2dimensional Euclidean shape.
Life can be associated to these energetic shapes... , where life must be of an odddimension and possess an oddnumber of holes in their characteristic shapes... , but all of these lifeshapes exist in higherdimensions than the descriptions of spatial displacements of 2shapes (contained) in 3Euclidean space.
The first lifeforms, in the dimensional hierarchy, are 3shapes in 4Euclidean space, but this now allows for the (new) metricspace R(4,2) where there is a 2dimensional temporal subspace. Thus (Time 1) is associated to material spatial displacements (in usual 3space), while (Time 2) is associated to livingmaterial spatial displacements (in new 3space). In regard to livingmaterial the spatial displacements could be displacements in the new direction away from the earth's orbital plane. Because this direction seems to have few constraints it is an advantage for life to have an infinite extent shape. This is (would be) true of both the 7dimensional and the 9dimensional lifeshapes (this is due to properties of hyperbolic simplexes in the different dimensional levels found by D Coxeter).
The affects of being deceived by language, and its propagandistic source, which expresses two absolute laws
1. the assumed law of inequality, and
2. the assumption and a demand that everyone believe in the idea of materialism.
This results in each citizen having a life defined by seeking to attain the icons (or images) of social value which are conjured from the society's highly controlled language and thought, derived from the civilization's propagandaeducation system, where education has become a contest of value, based on authoritative dogmas, which are controlled by the very few owners and investors of society, who determine the funding for research.
Hypothesize: the top of the social hierarchy may have as few as 5owners, whose social control is based on both money and violent terrorism.

contribute to this article
add comment to discussion
view discussion from this article
