portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article questions united states

corporate dominance

Legal american rights, not privlage of your strawman account registrar to England

Legal Constitution law of American rights of state sovereignty, not A privilege of the contract of the united state or state corporation your strawman account www.yourstrawman.com your birth certificate registrar to England,banking act 1913.dept of 1933
GOD GAVE YOU YOUR RIGHTS THE ONLY PLACE IN THE WORLD,,SAY NO TO HOME INVASION,THIS IS REAL about YOUR HOME RIGHT NOW, ,I would like to thank Lincoln county pud board for not installing an smart-meter tracking device on my home,READ THE REAL FACTS AND INFORMATION THAT THE MEDIA WONT TELL YOU ABOUT. Violation of my or yours please read on about your birth right under god,,please pass on to all save our Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution ALL The religious bible give's us statute laws of slavery, to force legal Americans to comply in the violation his or hers Constitutional legal rights, Not privileges by contract to a corporation of foreign government democracy ,or anther mans religion of slavery, look at the Muslims imaginations. dived and concord , Ask our American Court NOT NO WAY TO never never ever comply with ,.shari law in america.. Your Constitutional laws of American soil Read the facts,, Thank for your time in your personal Oregon Sovereignty - Tenth Amendment Center.. or your state GOD GAVE YOU YOUR RIGHTS THE ONLY PLACE TIN THE WORLD, Central Lincoln PUD P.O. Box 1126 Newport, OR 97365 board members, PRESIDENT Ron Benfield..rbenfield@newportnet.com VICE PRESIDENT Curt Abbott cabbott@peak.org SECRETARY Judy Matheny jjmatheny@q.com TREASURER Tom Tymchuk ttymchuk@cencoast.com DIRECTOR Larkin Kaliher lkaliher@cencoast.com Introduction to this letter of violation of my and all legal Americans 4th amendment, born rights Final Episode of Freedom Watch: When the Government Fears the People, There Is Liberty http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zhdNRbrR2E&feature=share I do not participant in violation of our ,yours and my 1st, 4th,10th ,16th ETC>> amendment of Constitutional born rights. I do NOT VOLUNTARY COMPLY with any Smart meters or any other devices that are in , VIOLATION OF our 4TH Amendment rights APPLIED Consent search - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Overview| Other parties| Revoking consent and exceptions| References ... conducting the consent search does not necessarily have to be identified as a law enforcement officer, and the person granting consent need not be the person police ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent_search - Cached I would like to thank pud for not putting an smartmeter on my home. STAWMAN ACCOUNT EDWARD M JOHNSTON II WWW.OREGONTRACKERS.COM ..In Helping the Elected and public employees unions members All NON_PROFITS, Public utility commissioners,{ Destroying Ours, yours , present and future grandchildren FREE use of public lands and all common law right of ways.. http://www.patriotnetwork.info/Citizens_rule_book.htm The posiblity of new sickness of our community thast could be related from any said smart meter aim..etc,, volition of your 4th amendment rights. www.kjonline.com/news/Lawsuit-targets-?CMP-smart-meters.html 2.7-14 Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any state or territory, subjects or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.(Civil Rights) 42 U.S.C. 1963. wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_remedies_at_law_differ_from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_remedy So If you trespass other then reading the meter I have right now meter number 56088,,,,95601441, Remedy, 20lbs 99.9 pure gold in one ounce pieces and $500,000.00 Cashiers check. To the strawman account of edwand malone johnston or to his trust, My Clan Name Is Boyd. If you trespass and violate my 4th amendment. two weeks after violation installation. The Board members our each liable for all court and lawyer fees/under . .en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_process SAY NO TO HOME INVASION I would like to thank Lincoln county pud board for not installing an smart-meter tracking device on my home. Please educate yourself on the real purpose possibility's of the smart meters and the elected and public employees pre-crime bill. commercial codes agents for personal gain The possibility of new unidentified sickness of our community that could be related from any said smart meter aim..etc,, some links www.kjonline.com/news/Lawsuit-targets-?CMP-smart-meters.html http://stopsmartmetersirvine.com/ www.refusesmartmeters.com Smart Meter Nausea - YouTube, Radiation Sickness: Smart Meter and Animals? - Detect Energy In my opinion in violates your constitutional rights. Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any state or territory, subjects or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.(Civil Rights) 42 U.S.C. 1963. Minority Report' Precrime for Real? House Bill Would Have ... [Aug 8, 2011] in ' Minority Report,' Tom Cruise played a member of a police ' precrime' unit, arresting people for crimes they had not yet committed. A bill in Congress proposes ... ( 11 Comments ) abcnews.go.com/Technology/minority-?report-precrime-real... Remember it is possible for anyone could be allege committing a crime in your home from this device, volition of your 4th amendment rights. please pass on because my Religion is being free man under GOD, GOD gave us our for father that gave freedom of our Constitutional laws the law of the constitution of the untied state ,http://www.patriotnetwork.info/Citizens_rule_book.htm,,,,, Are you a REAL AMERICAN! Two or more generations born in the USA Do you believe in your rights? Take the test h Read the Citizens Rule Book for rights of juries, views of American founders regarding jury trials, summarizing founding documents of the United States The bible give's us statute laws of slavery, to force legal Americans to comply in the violation his or hers, with anther mans religion of slavery, look at the Muslims imaginations. dived and concord , Ask our American Court to comply with ,.shari law in america.. Your Constitutional laws of American soil Read the facts,, Thank for your time in your personal Oregon Sovereignty - Tenth Amendment Center.. Oregon Sovereignty - Tenth Amendment Center Concordia res Parvae Crescunt ... Does Anyone Care About our Rights? The compass that has guided us for 222 years, that has kept America the land of the free and the ... tenthamendmentcenter.com/tag/oregon-sovereignty - Cached Addressing the Alleged complaint of Deputy District Attorney Brain J Gardner Where As strawman account of edward malone johnston II is federal and state disabled. proven that original injuries are work related, Where As stated in the 2006 Inspectors general report Where as I'm Disabled with limited resource as this court is aware of [PDF] RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITY Adobe PDF RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITY What are rights of people with disability? The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) recognises the barriers ... www.ag.gov.au/Documents/HRB%20- %20Guidance%20Sheets%20... On 1/5/09 I called the police because there was a knock on my door, When I open it there was bag of pharmacy prescribe drugs for the addressee of 1530 the fleschers,, To the best of my understand of Oregon statute codes to the best of my knowledge this would be illegal. I would find it differcult in any of pharmacological policy that a driver can just put prescriptions on a door step or the wrong address without signing for said pakage.. My mother Roberta Boyd was present and As well other witness,, The witness was the one who hand delivered it to Mr Flescher personally as he was splitting wood,(As I was still on the phone with Toledo police dept so I or any at address 1540 was not taking unauthorized commercial code medication, Mr Flescher was very rude to the witness as the wittiness leave his land.. Where as The Fleschers's made false police reports on my dog, The police investigation turn out that was not my dog in any of there complaints,The fleschers had personal political deference with myself,, Where as plaintiff called around to company's and there were no devilry on n Nye st that day As the Flescher's made dozens of false police reports on recorded against the strwaman account of edward johnston, As I testified on this matter on one senate and two. house bills in 2009. where as 9/24/09 I called the service again to report the Fleshers tearing down my fence, and removing land makers.Survey Loomis, Toledo, OR were making new property lines for new development in my direct area, so my property had to be moved over three feet, as I was told Brian Timmy at 1560 N Nye st, There were no public notice on this are at less I was not notified about by the city of Toledo Community Planning & Development on any development in my property area..That would impact my property rights ,, I would not have given up the creek that runs on the north side of my property, One of the main reason I purchases my land in 1996 was I knew it had water way on it, For my needs. Where As n I don't have the resource for increasing water rates.. So why should I be homeless for Your greater good.. Where As 2/27/2010 I called to report the attempt on my life by Trooper Mckay. As I stated on the record on the 911 tape, Trooper Mckay followed my as I turn left on to 7th street preceded to A st Was traveling started to proceed up A st, When The portal cars lights Go on, As I pull of in the area of the school ,, I pulled over when both Troopers proceed to driver door and passenger sides of the vehicle threaten my life with there pistols pointed At my Head.. Trooper Mckay stated the your rear tire passed on the line so are you drunk or on any kind of drugs.. I never heard that if my tire passed on the edge of a street line that warrants weapons drawn, threaten an citizens life. Oregon state police public safety emailed me apologize over the said incident. From 2002-2012. I have been pulled over five time at gun point and four time with tazers pointed at my person,,Lincoln county District attorney and other Lincoln county elected and public officials are aware as it is documented on public record , As I spoke against Senator Gordly sb 111 as the letter will be filed in this senate bill, copy will be in anther filling.,, That Lincoln county DA Rob Bovettt in the Lincoln county news-times paper 2010 after I believe was possibly on the complaint filed on this incident ,DA Rob Bovett made public commits On his position.... 7.44-47 Judges are not immune from criminal sanctions under the Civil Rights Act. ex parte Virginia (1879), 100 U.S. 339. 8.59-65 By the great weight of authority it is acknowledged that generally "public officials" are not immune from suit when they allegedly violate the civil rights of citizens, and that a "public official's" defense of immunity is to be sparingly applied in these kinds of cases. James v. Ogilvie, 1970, DC Ill., 310 F. Sup. 661, 663. Stop Smart Meters, Orange County, CA Messages In This Digest (1 Message) 1a. Important Info on Smart Meter Opt Out for SCE and SDG&E Customers From: melissa levine View All Topics | Create New Topic Message 1a. Important Info on Smart Meter Opt Out for SCE and SDG&E Customers Posted by: "melissa levine" Melissalevine@cox.net melissalevine1 Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:05 pm (PDT) I posted this on web site. It has info for getting one's analog meter back, which I highly recommend (even if they are charging). Melissa http://stopsmartmet ersirvine. com/2012/ 04/19/free- at-last-cpuc- approves- smart-meter- opt-out-for- sce-and-sdge- dr-neil-cherry- rfs-effect- on-neurotransmit ters-public- space-increasing ly-irradiated/ Free at Last: CPUC Approves Smart Meter Opt Out for SCE and SDG&E; Dr. Neil Cherry: RF's Effect on Neurotransmitters; Public Space Increasingly Irradiated Posted onApril 19, 2012 Good News. :) Today the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved a smart meter opt out option for both Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas and Electric customers. Please share this information with friends and neighbors. From the SCE press release: /"Starting May 9, customers may opt out by calling 1-800-810-2369. For customers already on the delay list, calling the number will enable them to enroll in the opt-out program and keep their current meters. Customers who have a smart meter, but would like to opt out, can have their meter exchanged for the type (i.e. electro-mechanical analog meter or non analog, non-smart digital meter) that was previously in place." /San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) has not yet announced the date their opt out will go into effect, but they need to offer it within twenty days. Their contact number is 1-800-411-7383 . Even though the CPUC has given the utilities permission to charge (price gouge?) California rate payers to opt out (a 75 dollar initial fee even if you already have an analog and a ten dollar additional monthly fee) I recommend that people still go for it. They don't want you to. (They have many plans--financial incentives-- for their smart grid including feeding your information to third party vendors). *Inactivate their "smart" meter program by refusing to participate! * Also, when you opt out you can send a note that you are paying the opt out fee "under protest." See also the Northern Californian web site Stop Smart meters! for othersuggestions to challenge the fees. Besides Besides the satisfaction of not going along with the big utility monoliths, there are, of course, other reasons to opt out of a "smart" meter. It is extremely easy for all of us to be inattentive to the possible effects of non ionizing radiation--as it is invisible, has no taste or smell, etc. You can only tell if you are being irradiated if you have a special meter/analyzer or if you happen to be electrohypersensiti ve. However, there are too many studies, including WHO's designation of it as a carcinogen, which show (even as it becomes so ubiquitous in our society) that Radio Frequency electromagnetic radiation may have adverse health effects. Arecent Yale study involving cell phones and mice, for example, showed cognitive changes from non ionizing radiation. Also, even though you may not be able to immediately feel the effects radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation is having on you, your cells are still responding. As the lateDr.Neil Cherry has said in a radio interview /"Our brain is an electromagnetic organ. [In] our central nervous system, every cell communicates with its neighbors to see how they are--using electromagnetic signals." /One effect radio frequency electromagnetic radiation has is to disrupt the calcium ions in our brains. . Says Dr. Cherry/"calcium ions control the neurotransmitters in the brain. . . .//If you expose the brain to these frequencies- you alter the calcium ions--you alter the brain patterns. That's what Ross Adey in California showed; repeated by the EPA; Carl Blackman; and it's been repeated in about 10 or 12 laboratories in the world--that calcium ions are changed by these signals. That's pretty well established. Frequencies match and cells react and change the behavior which changes the brain pattern, the reaction time."/ To stay updated about the ins and outs of the Smart Meter rulings, please see the following web sites and Facebook pages Burbank Action , StopOCSmartMeters, Stop Smart Meters Now (Facebook) , Center for Electrosmog Prevention , EMF Safety Network ,Stop Smart Meters! and Eon3emfblog . among others. There continue to be many issues with the smart meter opt out option (and the smart grid in general): it doesn't allow businesses to opt out; doesn't address multiple co-located smart meters; the soon to come (useless for you but lucrative for them) gas and water "smart" meters, etc. My web siteStop Smart Meters Irvine also has archived articles, links and occasional updates. I am not able to update it regularly, but the entire wireless issue (that is the complete irradiation of our public spaces) continues to advance. *Just FYI, Here are Some Mainly Local Examples*: 1.Wi Fi on OCTA Buses. The metal buses create what Dr. George Carlo calls a resonant cavity (increasing the radiation level); it's like riding in a traveling microwave oven. (For a funny take on the "microwave oven" idea, seeStephen Colbert's video where he puts an Amy's burrito between himself and his cell phone). 2. Wi Fi In Medical Clinics. In Irvine, medical clinics now offer irradiation services for free (no co pays) not in the radiology department but in the waiting room: The Kaiser Permanente medical clinic in Woodbridge, Irvine, frequented by newborns, people with pacemakers and others with various illnesses is now fitted with radiation emitting wi fi--because their administrator told me "their members wanted it." 3 The Irvine libraries have routers right above the reference desk so the employees are exposed to this all day long. Bonjour? I recommend they brush up on their French and call the National Library of France-where Wi Fi was completely removed because librarians became active and protested the health effects. 4. Buy your Daisy Sour Cream. Irradiate your Head! If you shop at the local grocery stores, you can be irradiated as you do your grocery shopping (Albertson's Campus store, dairy section; look above you on the wall--the spider like device is a high powered router. (There is Wi Fi in Ralphs and Gelsons, also.) 5. Mission Viejo Library: Special teen only section with cool irradiating spider: The irradiating "spider" is also affixed to a wall at the Mission Viejo Library near the children's area. 6. RF Chips Credit Cards: Also besides not holding (as neurosurgeon Dr. Keith Black recommends) your cell phone to your brain, you might think twice about stashing your new credit card in your pocket or bra--because the credit companies are now installing RF chips in these, which creates not only health but security risks. See this you tube video for the security issues . Note: If your company sends you such a card, you can punch the RF chip out with a hole puncher.) I will not comply with an With Radio-frequency identification Rfid Technology Tracking Devices - Video Results Play VideoRFID Medical Device Kit Tracking Play Video5 of 8- RFID: The Rise of the Mark of the Beast- Billy Crone Play VideoRFID Hospital Inventory Management - WaveMark spychips.com - how RFID will compromise privacy, security ... ... where global corporations like IBM, Procter & Gamble, and Wal-Mart's technology partner NCR plan to equip every product with a tracking device and use a network of RFID ... www.spychips.com - Cached http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=scZLv5pUr40&feature=endscreen S0 I could be track by credited card SSI number,, . NEW DRIVERS LICENSE(.YOUR FIRST TRACKING DEVICE ... NEW DRIVERS LICENSE(.YOUR FIRST TRACKING DEVICE) ... 2:51 Add to US confirms ( RFID) high- tech driver's licences by norfid 15,757 ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw4GBzB5Y3w By smart meter anyone in the USA could be track in anyone private,{YOU AT ALL TIMES ANY WERE IN THE COUNTRY} are commercial industry.. If you do anything that the elected and public employees unions or any financial not for profit gain on your strawman account Is it possibly I heard this from Lars Larson on his talk show in feb 2012,,, Please ask him If I'm correct, ::{{Become I my self have been falsely accused in the past}} , As I will emailed to him this as well..,, As I was saying I believe I heard him said on his talk show then If you don't won't to comply smart meters spying or other new job development spying on one anther,{turning you neighbor so there assets can be Confiscated by public employes,family and friends speeding your wealth and assets.. other and it possible medical trauma as-well devices of pre-crime,,,,you don;t need,life ,subsistence food of GOD,Electricity,water ,firewood heat off public lands , What a Christen, If you don't pay your corporation strawman , if you don;t comply , Americans of hundred years are more of all races should starve and dehydrate not have the right to travel.DRIVERS LICENSE VS RIGHT TO TRAVEL Lars there our responsible Americans why should we give up are freedom for the stockholders of the elected and public employees . .en.wikipedia.org/...Final_Settlement_With_Respect_to_Germany Lars I hope I'm wrong in this please correct me,, wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_remedies_at_law_differ_from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_remedy www.prisonplanet.com/pre-crime-technology-to-be-used-in Why are DHS and ICE stockpiling ammo? - YouTube The US Department of Homeland Security and the Immigrations and Customs Enforcement Office have placed an order for 450 million rounds of .40 caliber ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lw64vE0HXQ - Cached en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_ to_the_United.. my opinion PLEASE DON"T TAKE THIS WRONG anyone, , To me you are saying to all LEGALLY BORN AMERICANS BORN WHO OUR TRULY BORN ON USA. SOIL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH MARITIME LAWS. OF THE STRAWMAN ACCOUNT >>>..Of those who don't have GOD given rights of Country...YouTube - Republic vs Democracy if you do not comply in giving up your 4th amendment,"",This includes drug testing of the innocent for profits is a violations wears our compensation from commerce for the lost of our born rights"",Civil Rights) 42 U.S.C. 1963.2.7-14..www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/ uscode42/usc_sec_42.. In My opinion how can any American can deprived life from GOD almighty,, of Subsistence food hunting and fishing off of the coast lines and public lands,, Eclectic, Water, medical ,public service,,,,,,oathkeepers.org/oath/about PLEASE SIR LARS I HOPE I"M NOT misquoting YOU in any way>> IF I AM PLEASE EXCEPT MY APOLOGIES RIGHT KNOW>>KNOW IN GOD ALMIGHTY S NAME<>>I personally know what that is like when some one else puts wrongs in ones mouth,, I personally try never to do that,..... In my opinion would consider this treason to real legal Americans. oathkeepers.org/oath/about evergreen15317.org/met.php?irk=bush- signs...treaty-2006 I believe this is commerce agreements www.yourstrawman.com German-American Relations - President George Bush ... President George Bush. September ... to ratification, the Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany and a Related Agreed Minute, signed ... usa.usembassy.de/etexts/ga6-900925.htm - Cached What is Sovereign Citizenship? - American Patriot Network ARTICLE #1: What is Sovereign Citizenship? by Scott Eric Rosenstiel What is Sovereign Citizenship? Sovereign Citizenship is the status held by our forefathers. This means That the legal Americans you do not have signed his or her rights away to the corporation of the elected and public employes unions members or any other unknown corruption we all have no rights this includes you as well.. With respect here ..your are entering in a Maritime law contract . Apply only to legal American employ .... SO WHY SHOULD I BE.,,,, like most ., Physically disabled and elderly, an legal American worker we have rights by .http://www.oregontrackers.com/Civil_Rights.html Despite those who don't believe we DO have rights.. Our Legal American for-fathers since 1970 when the debt further on ones strawman for the service we have today,, where's the countability,and bank statements from our elected and public employees member corporation agency's from the last 70 years of existence... As you personally know that Americans across the states our still denied countability of taxes and budget figures , local bank statements , That I believe is call local control of separation from church and state.., from our local union and city cooperation.. {{{This exclude private unions the our paid for bay direct tax dollars. so we and our children today don;e have to live in fear of legal AMERICANS,,, the value of their know what is gowning and what is written off on the strawman.... www.yourstrawman.com.. gift to www.oregontrackers.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason Pending Cases http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/pge-sued-over-smart-meters-slows-down-bakersfield-deployment/ http://www.smartmeters.com/the-news/690-pgae-smart-meter-problem-a-pr-nightmare.html http://ppjg.me/2012/01/14/smart-meters-pge-blinks-after-lawsuit-is-filed/ http://www.kjonline.com/news/Lawsuit-targets-CMP-smart-meters.html By installing thous meter on any Legal American violate his or her GOD GIVEN RIGHTS UNDER GOD::{{ NOT THE DEVIL||||<< YOUR GOD GIVEN rights.. That Adolf Hitler and democracy.. YouTube - Republic vs Democracy .wont you to live this way.. Our LEGAL AMERICANS Grand parent and siblings. went and fought the ,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolution,,en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_ Wa. Civil war To my understanding my Ancestry fought for.Republic Separation from church and state..Live's were sacrificed in the belief so we would not have to pay the slavery taxes to the elected and public employes of Federal state state local employes.,property, local,excise taxes.,1776 revolutionary, , Civil, war, war of 1812, WWI, WWII answers.yahoo.com/question/ index?qid=20111026194608AAoN74M for FREEDOM FROM THE DEVIL< Democracy is willing to destroy your own Constitutional born rights and your legal bloodline children's freedom to live on yours, our their owned land or rented, . www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom YouTube - The American Dream By The Provocateur Network ..This I would call treason to our for father and mothers that gave for you to live with your constitutional rights of,,, http://www.patriotnetwork.info/Citizens_rule_book.htm....DRIVERS LICENSE VS RIGHT TO TRAVEL ,,, please allow other legal Americans to live with out your guilt, pain, and ,.. there is no reason to pass it on to legal American for generations to come, Is this what you wont for yourself and children,, 'Minority Report' Precrime for Real? House Bill Would Have ... [Aug 8, 2011] in 'Minority Report,' Tom Cruise played a member of a police ' precrime' unit, arresting people for crimes they had not yet committed. A bill in Congress proposes ... ( 11 Comments ) abcnews.go.com/Technology/minority- report-precrime-real... http://www.refusesmartmeters.com/ in violation of mine and you constitutional born rights,An denied our Constitutional legal rights, The elected and public employees unions and federal states county and city won;e you to sign your rights,,, over so they can claim you asset for their our god of choice. Maritime Admiralty Law - YouTube Maritime Admiralty Law Jordan Maxwell PLEASE CLICK on the AD to the RIGHT of THIS VIDEO by doing this you will help me to raise my Channel. You DO NOT have ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZqb0TW15EE - Cached .Play Video More results from youtube.com ? Smart meter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Overview| Purpose| Implementation examples| Imminent implementation A smart meter is usually an electrical meter that records consumption of electric energy in intervals of an hour or less and communicates that information at least ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_meter - Cached More results from en.wikipedia.org ? Stop Smart Meters! | Fighting for your health, privacy, and ... You can certainly blame your utility and state and federal regulatory agencies for those headaches?both real and figurative?since the smart meter went in. stopsmartmeters.org - Cached Smart Meters - YouTube Use the letter below to forbid smart meter installation (or modify the letter to demand the meter be removed). From: Energy Customer's Name Street Address ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JNFr_j6kdI - Cached .Play Video More results from youtube.com ? Smart Meters - Smart Meter News and Information Smart Meters are an innovative and advanced utility meter that records a business or consumers energy, water or gas usage in real time and in greater detail than ... www.smartmeters.com please give a gift for the disable in helping them www.oregontrackers.org http://www.youtube.com/embed/nA3LtXnNIto?feature=player_embedded Have more if interested.. here's some info what do you think... pass on you like.. What happened in Freetopia? A video fable about modern America - NaturalNews.tv YouTube - Republic vs Democracy DRIVERS LICENSE VS RIGHT TO TRAVEL SUI JURIS - THE TRUTH IN THE RECORD - Gaston How public schools are nothing more than prisons that train slaves (video), page 1 YouTube - The American Dream By The Provocateur Network YouTube - illegal seizure , 4th amendment violation http://www.naturalnews.com/035032_hypochondriacs_drug_marketing_pills.html ,,, please allow other legal Americans to live with out your guilt, pain, and ,.. there is no reason to pass it on to legal American for generations to come, Is this what you wont for yourself and children,, entertainment purpose only 'Minority Report' Precrime for Real? House Bill Would Have ... [Aug 8, 2011] in 'Minority Report,' Tom Cruise played a member of a police ' precrime' unit, arresting people for crimes they had not yet committed. A bill in Congress proposes ... ( 11 Comments ) abcnews.go.com/Technology/minority- report-precrime-real... I'm disabled denied service, I was injured on the job, Recorded in oregon, can afford to pay permits and other device like hunting and fishing odfw tags, I'm disabled denied food to gather my self, no transportation for up coming court cases or doctors appointments, our enjoying the day at the river, We see if one dose not pay the privilege to live, we you get it, read on, Wear's our money the legal American stock holders for generation ,we need all bank accounts to all public agency's and non-profits who reserved money for taxpayers, Even the elected offices filed numoures complaint against me, Including , this. my house has been intruded this missing. still denied freedom of information, 2006 inspectors generals report. that some did not believe I was really disabled from work related and transportation injuries. on www.oregontrackers.org My Claims before the Workers Compensation Board A letter to Congresswoman Hooley My Case before the State Court of Appeals Key medical and procedural docs Appeal Before the Workers Compensation Board - Part 1 and Part 2 Letter to Judge Ogawa 1.Workmans' Compensation Act, 1914 - Social Work and Social ... Workmans' Compensation Act, 1914. Employers ... federal legislation in 1914. The Act eliminated the workers' right to sue employers, and instead provided compensation ... www.socialpolicy.ca/cush/m3/m3-t17.stm - Cached 2.The Workers' Compensation Act The Maryland General Assembly first enacted the Workers' Compensation Act in 1914. The purpose of the Act was to provide relief to the increasing number of workers in ... www.mdcomplaw.com/info/industry/workers-?compensation-act - Cached 3. http://www.scribd.com/doc/94069345/New-but-Old-Knowledge Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 - Wikipedia, the free ... ?Titles of the ADA| ?Major life...| ?Opposition to the...| ?Quotations The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) is a law that was enacted by the U.S. Congress in 1990. It was signed into law on July 26, 1990, by President George ... en.wikipedia.org/.../Americans_with_?Disabilities_Act_of_1990 - Cached 1.WebAIM: United States Laws - Overview of the Rehabilitation ... Introduction. The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was the first major legislative effort to secure an equal playing field for individuals with disabilities. webaim.org/articles/laws/usa/rehab - Cached 2.Johnston v. City of Toledo et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings Oregon District Court - Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights - Johnston v. City of Toledo et al - Justia Federal Dockets and Filings dockets.justia.com/docket/oregon/ordce/?6:2007cv06302/85536 - Cached Search results 1.CAFR1 Home Page - Collective Government's True Wealth exposed Collective Government's True wealth shown. CAFR1 Home Page Collective Government's True Wealth exposed CAFR1 Walter Burien taxation Government Wealth The Biggest Game ... cafr1.com - Cached 2.1940's Secret "Corporate" Tactic By Which Government Took All! 1940's Secret "Corporate" Tactic By Which Government Took All! By Walter Burien 05/10/09. Many people have asked for a simple explanation as to the intent behind the ... cafr1.com/Secret.html - Cached 3.cafr1.com - Walter Burien welcomes you to CAFR1 Walter Burien welcomes you to CAFR1 ... car1.com caf1.com cafr.com cafr1com cafr1.om cafr1.cm cafr1.co afr1.com twitter-icon.com/site/cafr1.com - Cached must watch if you have children http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SD5-xfbcJI&feature=share BE VERY CONCERNED FOR YOUR CHILDREN, TRACKING YOU INFORMATION I created AIDS to deliberately depopulate the earth- Dr ... Dr Robert Gallo created aids virus to deliberately depopulate the earth? WATCH THE DAMN VIDEO BEFORE YOU COMMENT PLEASE!!!! www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/ thread849252/pg1 - Cached WAL-MART IS TRACKING YOU WITH RFID CHIP - YouTube Wal-Mart puts RFID chip in clothing to keep track of their inventory. The chips are still active after the clothing leave the store www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKrZGH_VjXI - Cached .Play Video More results from youtube.com ? Jerry Day explains the horror show called "Smart Meters" now playing, in a neighborhood near you! Video: must watch what your government is real doing to your children Smart Meters surveillance device spying on your home and family http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LzRmdaS1QOY#! in violation of mine and you constitutional born rights,An denied our Constitutional legal rights, The elected and public employees unions and federal states county and city won;e you to sign your rights,,, over so they can claim you asset for their our god of choice. 1.Maritime Admiralty Law - YouTube Maritime Admiralty Law Jordan Maxwell PLEASE CLICK on the AD to the RIGHT of THIS VIDEO by doing this you will help me to raise my Channel. You DO NOT have ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZqb0TW15EE - Cached .Play Video More results from youtube.com ? 1.Smart meter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ?Overview| ?Purpose| ?Implementation examples| ?Imminent implementation A smart meter is usually an electrical meter that records consumption of electric energy in intervals of an hour or less and communicates that information at least ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_meter - Cached More results from en.wikipedia.org ? 2.Stop Smart Meters! | Fighting for your health, privacy, and ... You can certainly blame your utility and state and federal regulatory agencies for those headaches?both real and figurative?since the smart meter went in. stopsmartmeters.org - Cached 3.Smart Meters - YouTube Use the letter below to forbid smart meter installation (or modify the letter to demand the meter be removed). From: Energy Customer's Name Street Address ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JNFr_j6kdI - Cached .Play Video More results from youtube.com ? 4.Smart Meters - Smart Meter News and Information Smart Meters are an innovative and advanced utility meter that records a business or consumers energy, water or gas usage in real time and in greater detail than ... www.smartmeters.com http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wd07OdxwQQQ&feature=relmfu Have more if interested.. here's some info what do you think... pass on you like.. What happened in Freetopia? A video fable about modern America - NaturalNews.tv YouTube - Republic vs Democracy DRIVERS LICENSE VS RIGHT TO TRAVEL SUI JURIS - THE TRUTH IN THE RECORD - Gaston we need you help the elected and public employees, protect our consitutional rights and protect your own homes. 2012 could The end of the world is Indivisual freedom, Drones over US to get weaponized - so far, non-lethally http://www.setyoufreenews.com/2012/05/24/drones-over-us-to-get-weaponized-so-far-non-lethally/ Radiation bay seafood ban extended The Press Association A ban on gathering seafood and bait from a beach which has radioactive particles present has been extended. It became an offence earlier this month for seafood to be collected at Dalgety Bay in Fife after an emergency order was put in place. See all stories on this topic ? How public schools are nothing more than prisons that train slaves (video), page 1 YouTube - The American Dream By The Provocateur Network YouTube - illegal seizure , 4th amendment violation http://www.naturalnews.com/035032_hypochondriacs_drug_marketing_pills.html What is treason, read on, if this could be applied what would you, do. Juvenile Court have no constitutional bearing in the US - this is a court designed after Great Britain. We are living in the USA! Our opinion of Immigration US Code - Laws regarding Business Gun Control Act of 1968 compared to the Gun Control Act of 1938 ABC News Report on gun confiscation A example of Gun Confiscation In New Orleans 2007 Oregon House Bills 2007 Oregon Senate Bills 2005 Oregon House Bills 2005 Oregon Senate Bills Working for a true Constitutional, Anti-Tyranny, Anti-Corruptions, Anti-Red Tape, Non-Ideological NEW POLITICAL CENTER Child Protective Services Resources Who is behind Screening Children? What do concerned citizens say about the way the City of Toledo is managed? Mandatory Drug Testing - Judges and Police Officers US Code - Laws regarding Business Gun Control Act of 1968 compared to the Gun Control Act of 1938 ABC News Report on gun confiscation A example of Gun Confiscation In New Orleans Peace Officer's statement from Australia Is the Real ID for real? Family Court and Parenting in New Zealand Are Taxes Constitutional and Fairly Enacted? Watch America Freedom to Fascism by Aaron Russo Recommedations for political actions in 2009: "One Year Later but Still Not too Late" by LaRouche Our Nations Principles in times of Economic downturn: "1932: Speak Not of Parties But of Universal Principles" by LaRouche Immigration and the Future: "A First Hand View of the U. S Border" by State Rep. Jeff Krupf A list of Ed's Letters and news articles of public interest Past week Past month Including results for article 18 part iii chapter m306 4108 Show only article 18 part III chaper m306 4108 Search results U.S. Code Title 18 > Part III > Chapter 306 - Transfer To Or ... U.S. Code Title 18 > Part III > Chapter 306 - Transfer To Or From Foreign Countries :: Laws ... ? 4108: Verification of consent of offender to transfer to the United States www.lawserver.com/.../us_code_title_18_part_iii_chapter_306 - Cached Think this reporter is mad??? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1lJd2eLG0M&feature=youtu.be Remember NAFTA WAKE UP PEOPLE..your home is now with smartmeters Austin Government Officials Seize Man's Home because he had a Bunker http://offgridsurvival.com/governmentofficialsseizebunkerhome/ New World Order's Population Reduction Plan Pt.2 [www.keepvid.com].mp4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1t81Edhl2Y&feature=related Search results 1.1 MILLION pounds of Food on 3 acres. 10,000 fish 500 yards ... Interested in aquaponics? Go here to grow up to 10 times the plants, in half the time, while the "fish" do all the work! http://thelocalwebsolution.com ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV9CCxdkOng - Cached .Play Video The President who told the Truth about illuminati Vlad TV http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=20KDBELD20I&NR=1 SO I could LOSE MY HOME TO THE ELECTED AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES UNIONS MEMBERS FOR NOT PAYING MY TAXES, WHEN I WAS DISABLED ON A COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT ON THE JOB. SO WHERE'S THE FINDING MONEY THAT HAS BEEN PAID FOR ON ALL THREE SIDES IN TAX REVENUE,INSURANCE premiums,{WHEN AN NATIONAL DISASTER HAPPENS HOW COME PREMIUMS GO UP. TO PAY FOR WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN PAID FOR HOW COME COMPANY'S US TO GET 2-4 PCT, GET MUCH MORE TODAY.,NON-PROFIT DEDUCTIONS,FEDERAL ,STATE,COUNTY AND CITY, WHEN WAS PROPERTY TAXES LAW, BY ALL ACCOUNTS OR VOLUNTEER, WHEN DID THE WEST START PAYING PROPERTY TAXES IN THE LAST FORTY YEARS WHERE'S THE INTEREST PAID IN ALL LEGAL AMERICAN FUNDS TO PROTECT OUR CITY S TO OUR COUNTRY, FOR THE DISABLED AND LEGAL AMERICAN ELDERLY WORKING CLASS. SO WE DON'T BECOME HOMELESS; I HAVE SEVENTEEN BLOWN DICES A CRUSHED LOWER BACK, TWO SPINAL SURGERY'S, OTHER SEVER MEDICAL. AN I'M denied the right to HUNTING FISHING OR TRAVEL, BECAUSE I'M DISABLED AND THOUS AROUND EVEN SAID IT WAS NOT MY FAULT FOR DOING SUCH A JOB, ANY PERSON INJURED ON THECOMMERCIAL JOB NO MATTER WHAT HAS RIGHTS 1914, ARE WE GO BACK TO THE ROMAN DAYS OF SLAVERY, OUR THEIR ANY SIMILARITIES HERE. No coverage from the system/ I ENTITLE TO MY CONSTITUTION RIGHTS AS YOU ARE. THAT GOD FOR THE UNITED STATES CONDITIONAL AND COMMON LAWS SEPARATION FROM CHURCH AND STATE. http://www.patriotnetwork.info/Citizens_rule_book.htm AS SOME WOULD SAY INCLUDING TALK SHOW HOST GOD GAVE US THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF GOD GIVEN RIGHTS FREEDOM WITH OUT PAYING THE PRIVILEGE TO HAVE WATER AND FOOD SO WHAT IS IT. AS I UNDERSTAND GOD DIED FOR OUR ,YOUR ,SINS. CITY'S OUR RAISING WATER RATES 500% WHERE'S , I HAVE REQUESTED THERE ACCOUNTS,WHERES IS ALL LEGAL AMERICAN MONEY PAID INTO THE SYSTEM FOR THE LAST FIFTY YEARS, DID THE BOARDS HAVE A LEGAL RIGHT TO SIGN FOR SUCH DEBT. NO THEY OUR RESPONSIBLE FOR DEBT JUST LIKE YOU ARE FOR YOURS TO MY UNDERSTANDING ONE HAS TO SIGN FOR DEBT, SO MUCH MORE I HAVE TESTIFIED AT NUMEROUS PUBLIC HEARINGS AROUND OREGON STATE OVER THE YEARS.. Romans 13:1-7 New International Version bible (NIV) Submission to Governing Authorities 13 Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2 Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. 3 For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. 4 For the one in authority is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God's servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. 5 Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience. 6 This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God's servants, who give their full time to governing. 7 Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor. I tesafied agaisnt the senaete as well, As to my recalection ,, Sen. Peter Courtney,,D, Said were a domarecy let the voters deside,. http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/greetings-from-the-peoples-republic-of-oregon/blog-249851/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SD5-xfbcJI&feature=share History of the Bible (Full Documentary) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqarwCKiIe8&feature=related What do treason mean Treason - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In individual...| List of people...| Related offences| See also In law, treason is the crime that covers some of the more extreme acts against one's sovereign or nation. Historically, treason also covered the murder of specific ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason - Cached Amazing Ron Paul Interview Must See - Video Results Play VideoAmazing RON PAUL Interview MUST SEE!!! Play VideoCarol Paul Interview - One thing Ron wanted her to say is.... Play VideoWhere Amazing Happens - 2011 NBA Season Preview ( Must See! ) HD Search results Amazing RON PAUL Interview MUST SEE!!! - YouTube Ron Paul interview on the Morton Downly Jr. SHow, FUNNY!!!!! and startling. www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyV9Owe3ojA - Cached .Play Video More results from youtube.com ? Ron Paul Interview 1988. A Must See - YouTube Ron Paul Interview 1988. A Must See ... not getting social security? Damn. This guy is fucking amazing. www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO2TCQd93D4 - Cached .Play Video Ron Paul Ad - Consistent - Best quality! Why Hasnt The - Video Results Play VideoWhy Hasn't This Video Gone Viral Play VideoWhy Hasn't This Video Gone Viral? Play VideoWhy Hasn't This Video Gone Viral (Let's make it Viral) Search results Why Hasn't This Video Gone Viral? - YouTube Ron Paul was right in his predictions along with other including me who say the truth in what he was saying. I don't think it was that others in the ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sok0oU8R-uU - Cached .Play Video More results from youtube.com ? Ron Paul 2012~Why Hasn't This Video Gone Viral~mirrored from ... After 30 years of playing the game, the Man who can actually do something to stop this sellout of the American Soul is still being slandered, ignored, and ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-AdX4Yg19c .Play Video Edwards v. Arizona - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Facts| U.S. Supreme...| Contrast to the...| See also Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S 477 (1981), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that once a defendant invokes his Fifth Amendment right to counsel ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Arizona - Cached More results from en.wikipedia.org ? Obama Loses Temper! "Are you Serious?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWhkgRBMzWQ&feature=fvwrel Public Notice of TREASON Sovereign Citizen Plaintiff vs. Accused Treason against the United States of America Violation of Your Sworn OATH of Office You. as a Public Official, who has Sworn an Oath of Office, to Defend, Protect, and Preserve the Constitution for the united States of America against all enemies, both Foreign and Domestic, as well as its Citizens, and to Honor it as the Supreme Law of the Land; defined by Law as one owing Allegiance to the United States of America in your position of Public Trust. You failure to honor your Sworn Oath (documented by the within named Plaintiff) fulfills the requirements of an Act of Treason as cited in the United States Constitution, to wit: "in levying war against them [the States and "We the People"], or, in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort." TREASON, by law, is punishable by the Death Penalty. Thus, any violation one's Oath of Office, by those Sworn and paid to Honor the Constitution for the united States of America, is an overt act of treason against "We the People." Such acts are in contempt of the law, affecting other Public Servants who may 'go along - to get along,' leading to the loss of confidence in Government and eventual corruption in Government. If lawlessness continues un-reported and un-punished, tyranny becomes king and Government the Master. If enough citizens, patriots, and Christians understand this traditional love for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness, traditional in America - this will not happen. You. (the Accused, are now put on notice by this letter, that your act(s) of Treason are now part of the Public Record. This letter is delivered to you, the Accused, showing that there is a legal file being prepared for your prosecution. The responsibility to document vour Act(s) of Treason rests with the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff has a legal obligation to make your Act(s) of Treason known to Government Officials. (18 USC Section 4) and the moral responsibility to post this Notice in public places near your piace of business, or in the areas of your residence, as a Public Service. All local media will, also, in this process, be fully informed. For vour information, this letter will be entered as a Court Exhibit, in addition to other evidence, to document your Act(s) of Treason against "We the People," when formal charges and proceedings are filed against you. An Act of Treason against one individual, by another - is an act against all American Citizens. Signature:______________________ Address:_______________________________________________________ Date:___________ City, State:_____________________________________ STATE OF: COUNTY OF: 1st witness:__________________________________ 2nd witness:__________________________________ 3rd witness:__________________________________ I,___________________, a Notary Public, an officer authorized by law to administer oaths, do hereby certify that the foregoing four signatories, 1._____________________________2.__________________________________ 3.________________________________________ 4.___________________________________ did appear before me and sign these documents. DATED this__________day of_____________, 200 Notary Public:__________________________ in and for the County of ______________, State of ________. My Commission expires:__________ BLOCKBUSTER REVELATION! - MINI Documentary - Illegal Obama "Propped Up" By Congress! http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw http://gulagbound.com/29684/maritime-attack-law-of-the-sea-treaty-in-us-senate-for-approval/#.T7WzVciD-lU The Truth About Bottled Water - YouTube The Truth About Bottled Water ... obsession but tap water is usually safer for you, and often better tasting too. Using a hidden camera, Penn & Teller ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfPAjUvvnIc - Cached .Play Video More results from youtube.com ? truth about bottled water - YouTube penn and teller reveal it all again ladies and gents so enjoy www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdvJOF-2mm0 - Cached .Play Video District of Columbia Act of 1871 Defacto formed 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPkauG6qE8k MARITIME ATTACK: Law of the Sea Treaty in US Senate for Approval May 15, 2012, 1:13 pm By Arlen Williams The U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs is once again diddling with the ultra-massive U.S. sovereignty and communitarian wealth giveaways known as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Treaty (UNCLOS or LOST). Whenever one sees "communitarian," one may think "global communist." Neo-Marxist Saboteur Barack Obama's State and Defense Departments (including numerous compromised, NATO-head officers) are pressuring the Senate to adopt this travesty after years of resistance dating back to Ronald Reagan's presidency. If the committee goes forward with it, they could choose either of two paths: 1. the honorable and traditional congressional method of holding hearings, or 2. "fast-track" it, in order to slip voting through with as little light of day or time for the People to react, as possible. The Senate is still Harry Reid's crypto-Marxist Senate, and this committee's chairman is John Kerry, so LOST may pop up for a vote like a rapist plunging from behind the bushes in the dark, within the next few days. Recent and upcoming reports may be found at Heritage.org: "heritageaction.com/tag/law-of-the-sea-treaty." Gulag Bound will also continue to monitor: "gulagbound.com/tag/un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea-unclos-or-lost." For other sources, see in Investors.com, "Obama Seeks Sovereignty Surrender Via LOST Treaty," May 8, 2012; in U.S. News & World Report, "Kill the Law of the Sea Treaty," May 10; and at Breitbart, Daily Caller, or American Thinker, "American Sovereignty: LOST at Sea?" by Ken Blackwell and Bob Morrison, May 14. Perhaps the most thorough of the most recent articles is found at Liberty News Online, "The Creature from the Ocean's Floor - the Law of the Sea Treaty," by John W. Wallace, May 15. We hope Mr. Wallace does not mind our excerpting it at length. The Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) was first conceived in the early 1980's by the United Nations as a method for them to gain control of most of the activities on, over, and beneath the ocean's surface. The fundamental premise of the Law of the Sea Treaty is that the resources on the ocean's floor belong to all of the people of the world and those resources should be protected and controlled by an international organization like the United Nations. Although that may sound like a noble goal, in order to achieve this goal, the United Nations has created a multinational, bureaucratic creature called the International Seabed Authority ("ISA") and charged this entity with regulating and controlling the world's mineral resources in the oceans. When President Reagan was president, he objected to several of the treaty's provisions that would have resulted in surrendering our nation's sovereignty and refused to sign it, but that didn't stop the proponents of world government and the New World Order. In 1994, the "progressives (a nice term used to describe communists) at the United Nations decided to keep moving forward with their plans by creating a diversion they called an "Agreement of Implementation" that was supposed to address the concerns of the United States and other industrialized nations. It didn't change anything. This new agreement was all smoke and mirrors, but our Oxford educated, globalist president Bill Clinton signed it anyway. The Senate, however, refused to ratify it, as required by the U.S. Constitution. Proposed regulations in the new Law of the Sea Treaty will require private companies that want to conduct exploration and mining operations in international waters to submit substantial application fees to the UN's International Seabed Authority (ISA), which in turn would allow the ISA to use these application fees to partially pay for its own mining efforts through its own mining subsidy, called the Enterprise. Corporations from member nations operating in international waters would have to pay annual fees and even be taxed to pay a percentage of their profits to the ISA. These corporations would also be expected to share their mining and navigational technology with third world countries to ensure that opportunities aren't restricted to more technologically advanced. This is insane. The decision to grant or to withhold mining permits in international waters would now be decided by unelected, globalist bureaucrats at the United Nation's International Seabed Authority (ISA). The Treaty would essentially give the United Nations, a notoriously corrupt, anti-American, anti-capitalist and un-democratic organization, the power to assert control over 70% of the earth's surface. Using the regulations issued by the ISA, the United Nations would now be given the power to levy international fees and taxes on American companies. Mining approvals would be highly politicized and could discriminate against American operators. The United Nations would be given the power to regulate ocean research, exploration, fishing, marine environmental protection and navigation. They could even impose production quotas and licensing requirements on American fishermen operating in international waters. The United Nations, through the ISA, would be given the power to create an international court system to render and enforce its judgments! This new system would lie outside the jurisdiction of the U.S. legal system and the U.S. Constitution, leaving American citizens and businesses at the mercy of international tribunals whose corrupt UN bureaucrats could subject them to Sharia Law or other non-Western legal traditions. The Treaty calls for prosperous member nations like the United States to provide financial and technical assistance not only to developing countries, but also to "people who have not attained full independence or other self-governing status" (codeword for groups such as the Palestinians). The Treaty would do irreparable harm to U.S. military and intelligence operations and would force the United States to hand over proprietary technology to less developed third-world countries, many of whom are actively hostile to U.S. interests. Giving up the U.S. Navy's long established primary mission of "maintaining freedom of the seas for all" and handing it over to a historically corrupt organization like the United Nations should be unthinkable. The most important objection concerns Article 314 of The Law of the Sea Treaty (located in Part XVII) that empowers the LOST member Assembly, dominated by nations of the developing world, to amend the terms of the treaty over the objection of any individual member state. In other words, the terms of the treaty could be changed significantly and the United States would have to abide by those changes without the U.S. Senate having the opportunity to consent to the changes. This undermines U.S. sovereignty and is clearly unconstitutional. The Law of the Sea Treaty creates a new United Nations' worldwide bureaucracy that will create a whole new restrictive system of destructive environmental regulations that would be costly and counter-productive to American businesses, while at the same time, handing over the hard-earned, American taxpayer money to many of our enemies. The socialists, Marxists, globalists and other supporters of the New World Order keep pushing for this treaty. Senator Harry Reid has indicated that he might reintroduce the treaty in the Senate for a vote in the near future and Barack Obama, our socialist President, who is a long term advocate of the Law of the Sea Treaty, has indicated that he will sign it if passed by the Senate. The Coalition to Preserve American Sovereignty has brought an open letter to the senate, coordinated by Frank Gaffney, with the signatures of nineteen notables. This letter is featured in The Minority Report, which would also expose a separate, false-hood front group calling itself The American Sovereignty Campaign, purporting itself as pro-sovereignty while lobbying for LOST. The American Sovereignty Campaign - interesting - almost as if someone's email or telephone conversations were caught. Oh well. It is a common practice for immoral Marxists and other ideological movements sponsored by the kleptocratic central bank complex to either attempt to control their opposition, or to set up an operation posing as a faction of it. Sen. Kerry summoning a political jiu-jitsu pose It is again time for immediate and forcefully amassed communications to U.S. Senators of all kinds, even their numerous Fabianists. A two-thirds majority is required to approve a treaty, but these people are being heavily pressured by the kleptocracy and their globalist co-conspirators. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations members Leaders John F. Kerry (MA-D) Chairman Richard G. Lugar (IN-R) Ranking Member - rank globalist traitor on the GOP side, exiting by recent popular vote Democrat majority members Barbara Boxer (CA) Robert Menendez (NJ) Benjamin L. Cardin (MD) Robert P. Casey (PA) - isn't he okay? isn't he pro-life? Jim Webb (VA) - the conflicted one Jeanne Shaheen (NH) Christopher Coons (DE) - self described former "bearded Marxist;" now shaves Richard J. Durbin (IL) - designated neo-Marxist spinmeister following in Joseph Biden's footsteps, often comic, always dangerous Tom Udall (NM) Republican minority members (to be contacted and watched with no less diligence) Bob Corker (TN) James E. Risch (ID) Marco Rubio (FL) James M. Inhofe (OK) Jim DeMint (SC) Johnny Isakson (GA) John Barrasso (WY) Mike Lee (UT) Another response, though typically of lesser impact, a petition to the senate is being sponsored by conservative PAC, Right March. Following is notable and extensive analysis from the recent past. After public anger over a provision in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that allows indefinite detention of American citizens without accusation or trial, Congress has paraded a "new" version that is supposed to overcome this danger. [However, a close reading of the bill reveals that nothing has changed except the addition of assuring phrases without substance. It proves that those who drafted this bill are using deliberate deception.] http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/11381-ndaa-2013-headed-to-full-house-smith-amash-amendment-offered NDAA 2013 Headed to Full House; Smith/Amash Amendment Offered After a US federal court blocked NDAA indefinite detention of US citizens the House of Representatives passes the 2013 NDAA which reauthorizes it. http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2012/05/18/ndaa-2013-congress-reauthorizing-jailing-citizens-trial-134971/ http://gulagbound.com/29684/maritime-attack-law-of-the-sea-treaty-in-us-senate-for-approval/#.T7WzVciD-lU MARITIME ATTACK: Law of the Sea Treaty in US Senate for Approval http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zXGi-NnVnHM ACORN Changes Their Name To SATAN CPS Drugs 4 Year Olds - Baby LK Report For May 20th 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYmUBDwHKdI&feature=g-all-u http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=7r0c_kfdwQU Fluoridation http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&v=hF1akWl1k68&NR=1 Chemtrails http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t52Y_qEyoyo&feature=related wake up stop the elected and public employees who don't protect your oathkeepers.org our people alive our a computer. birds and Fish are now Dying all Around the World | EUTimes.net UPDATED on March 09, 2011 Massive fish deaths are back! NEW MASS DEATHS reported in California! The story was published on January 6. Update 1 was www.eutimes.net/2011/01/birds...dying-?all-around-the-world - Cached More reports of dead birds and fish from around the world More reports of dead birds and fish from around the world ... said penguins, petrels and other seabirds were already dying in large ... www.newsnet5.com/dpp/weather/weather_?news/reports-of... - Cached History of the Bible (Full Documentary) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqarwCKiIe8&feature=related Image Detail 2012 were all dead or in a Concentration camp. Police State 2012 NDAA has passed. NO NWO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpOgdKntS6I&feature=related TO TRAVEL IS A RIGHT, YOU DO NOT NEED A GOVERNMENT GRANTED "PRIVILEGE" you will need to make the hedder but SAY NOTHING BUT PROVE ME GUILTY 1. The issue is whether this Sovereign is required to obey the provisions in the state statutes. It is the contention of this Sovereign that because he is a Free and Natural Person who has given up none of his "RIGHTS." That the legislative enactments and statutes do not apply to him. It is also the contention of this Sovereign that travels upon the streets or highways in any state of America by this Sovereign is an unalienable "RIGHT." Being this, is not subject to regulation or legislation by any "State" of the united States. 2. Let us first consider the contention of this Sovereign that travels upon the streets or highways in America is a "RIGHT." Various courts have ruled on this issue. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled: 2.1 The "RIGHT" to travel is a part of the liberty of which the Citizen cannot be deprived without due process of the law under the 5th Amendment. (Emphasis added) See: Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125 3. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin stated in 1909: 3.1 The term "public highway," in its broad popular sense, includes toll roads -- any road which the public have a "RIGHT" to use even conditionally, though in a strict legal sense it is restricted to roads which are wholly public. (Emphasis added). See: Weirich v. State, 140 Wis. 98. 4. The Supreme Court of the State of Illinois ruled: 4.1 Even the legislature has no power to deny to a Citizen the "RIGHT" to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, through this "RIGHT" might be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. (Emphasis added) See: Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 N.E. 22 5. "Regulated" here means traffic safety enforcement, stop lights, sign, etc., NOT a privilege that requires permission, i.e.; licensing, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, etc.. 6. PRIVILEGE OR RIGHT? 6.1 The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is NOT a mere PRIVILEGE, but a "COMMON AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT" of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived. (Emphasis added) See: Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, supra; Ligare v. Chicago, 28 N.E. 934; Boone v. Clark, 214 S.W. 607; American Jurisprudence 1st Ed., Highways 163 6.2 Citizen's "RIGHT" to travel upon public highways includes right to use usual conveyances of time, including horse-drawn carriage, or automobile, for ordinary purposes of life and business. (Emphasis added) See: Thompson v. Smith (Chief of Police), 154 S.E. 579, 580 6.3 The "RIGHT" of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a "COMMON RIGHT" which he has under the "RIGHT" to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. (Emphasis added) See: Thompson v. Smith, supra. 7. It could not be stated more conclusively that Sovereigns of the states have a "RIGHT" to travel, without approval or restriction, (license), and that this "RIGHT" is protected under the U.S. Constitution. After all, who do the roadways belong to anyway? The People-At-Large. Here are other court decisions that expound the same facts: 7.1 .... [T]he streets and highways belong to the public, for the use of the public in the ordinary and customary manner. See: Hadfield v. Lundin, 98 Wn. 657; 168 P. 516; 7.2 All those who travel upon, and transport their property upon, the public highways, using the ordinary conveyance of today, and doing so in the usual and ordinary course of life and business. See: Hadfield, supra; State v. City of Spokane, 109 Wn. 360; 186 P. 864. 7.3 The "RIGHT" of the Citizen to travel upon the highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, differs radically and obviously from that of one who makes the highways his place of business and uses it for private gain .... (Emphasis added) See: State v. City of Spokane, supra. 7.4 ...... [F]or while a Citizen has the "RIGHT" to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, that "RIGHT" does not extend to the use of the highways, either in whole or in part, as a place of business for private gain. For the latter purposes no person has a vested right to use the highways of the state, but is a MERE PRIVILEGE or license which the legislature may grant or withhold at its discretion .... (Emphasis added). See: Hadfield, supra; State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; Cummins v. Jones, 155 P. 171; Packard v. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 257, 264 U.S. 140 and other cases too numerous to mention. 8. The Washington State Supreme Court stated: 8.1 I am not particularly interested about the rights of haulers by contract, or otherwise, but I am deeply interested in the "RIGHTS" of the public to use the public highways freely for all lawful purposes. (Emphasis added). See: Robertson v. Department of Public Works, 180 Wash. 133 at 139 9. The Supreme Court of the State of Indiana ruled in 1873: 9.1 It is not the amount of travel, the extent of the use of a highway by the public that distinguishes it from a private way or road. It is the "RIGHT" to so use or travel upon it, not its exercise. (Emphasis added) See: ? Ind 455, 461 10. 11 American Jurisprudence 1st, has this to say: 10.1 The "RIGHT" of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is NOT a mere PRIVILEGE which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a "COMMON RIGHT" which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with, not disturbing another's "RIGHTS," he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct. (Emphasis added) See: 11 American Jurisprudence 1st., Constitutional Law, 329, page 1123 11. The Supreme Court of the State of Georgia ruled: 11.1 In this connection it is well to keep in mind that, while the public has an absolute "RIGHT" to the use of the streets for their primary purpose, which is for travel, the use of the streets from the purpose of parking automobiles is a privilege, and not a "RIGHT"; and the privilege must be accepted with such reasonable burdens as the city may place as conditions to the exercise of the privilege. (Emphasis added). See: Gardner v. City of Brunswick, 28 S.E.2d 135 12. The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado discussed the issue in the following way in 1961. 12.1 The Constitution of the State of Colorado, Article II, ?3 provides that: All persons have certain natural, essential and unalienable "RIGHTS," among which may be reckoned the "RIGHT" .... of acquiring, possessing and protecting property; .... 12.1.1 A motor vehicle is property and a person cannot be deprived of property without due process of law. The term: "property," within the meaning of the due process clause, includes the "RIGHT" to make full use of the property which one has the unalienable "RIGHT" to acquire. 12.1.2 Every Citizen has an unalienable "RIGHT" to make use of the public highways of the state; every Citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty. (Emphasis added). See: People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210 13. The Constitution of the State of Idaho contains the words: 13.1 All men are by nature free and equal, and have certain unalienable "RIGHTS," among which are ....; acquiring, possessing, and protecting property .... (Emphasis added). 14. The words of the Idaho Constitution are to all intents and purposes identical with those of the North Carolina Constitution. The Constitution of the State of North Carolina, Article I, ?1, states as follows: 14.1 The equality and rights of persons. We hold it to be self- evident that all persons are created equal; that they are endowed by the Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, the enjoyment of the fruits of their own labor, and the pursuit of happiness. 14.2 To be that statutes which would deprive a citizen of the rights of person or property without a regular trial, according to the course and usage of common law, would not be the law of the land. See: Hoke v. Henderson, 15 N.C. 15, 25 AM.Dec. 677 15. Since courts tend to be consistent in their rulings, it would be expected the Idaho Supreme Court would rule in the same manner as the North Carolina Supreme Court. 16. Other authorities have arrived at similar conclusions: 16.1 The Constitution for the United States of America, Amendment 9: 16.1.1 The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. 17. The Constitution of the State of North Carolina, Article I, ?36: 17.1 Other rights of the people. The enumeration of rights in this Article shall not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the people. 18. I demand all of my other rights, including the right to travel upon the public highways and byways in the United States of America. 19. The Constitution of the State of North Carolina, Article I, ?2: 19.1 Sovereignty of the people. All political power is vested in and derived from the people; all government of right originates from the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole. 20. As member of the Sovereignty of the people, I not only am entitled to use the highways and byways in the United States of America, I have an inalienable right to use the highways and byways. 20.1 Highways are public roads which every Citizen has a "RIGHT" to use. (Emphasis added). See: 3 Angel Highways 3. 20.2 A highway is a passage, road, or street, which every Citizen has a "RIGHT" to use. (Emphasis added). See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary. 21. I have emphasized the word "RIGHT" because it is a common point among the authorities listed. The Idaho Code even joins in this common point: 21.1 49-301 (13) Street or highway. -- The entire width between property lines of every way or place of whatever nature when any part thereof is open to the use of the public, as a matter of "RIGHT," for purposes of vehicular traffic. (Emphasis added.) See: Idaho Code. 22. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that: 22.1 Undoubtedly the "RIGHT" of locomotion, the "RIGHT" to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the "RIGHT," ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any State is a "RIGHT" secured by the Fourteenth Amendment and by other provisions of the Constitution. (Emphasis added). See: Williams v. Fears, 343 U.S. 270, 274 23. Thus, there can be little doubt that, when this Sovereign travels upon the streets or highways in North Carolina, he does so as a matter of "RIGHT" and not privilege. The authority for such travel is described variously as a "RIGHT," a "COMMON RIGHT," an "ABSOLUTE RIGHT," an "UNALIENABLE RIGHT," and a "RIGHT" protected by the Constitution of the United States. Let us then examine the importance of these terms to this Sovereign by defining their meaning. 23.1 "RIGHT" -- In law, (a) an enforceable claim or title to any subject matter whatever; (b) one's claim to something out of possession; (c) a power, prerogative, or privilege, as when the word is applied to a corporation. See: Webster Unabridged Dictionary 23.2 "RIGHT" -- As relates to the person, "RIGHTS" are absolute or relative; absolute "RIGHTS," such as every individual born or living in this country (and not an alien enemy) is constantly clothed with, and relate to his own personal security of life, limbs, body, health, and reputation; or to his personal liberty; "RIGHTS" which attach upon every person immediately upon his birth in the kings dominion, and even upon a slave the instant he lands within the same. (Emphasis added). See: 1 Chitty Pr. 32. 23.3 "RIGHT" -- A legal "RIGHT," a constitutional "RIGHT" means a "RIGHT" protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of "RIGHT" or original "RIGHTS"; it acknowledges them ..... (Emphasis added). See: Bouver's Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2916 23.4 Absolute "RIGHT" -- Without any condition or incumbrance as an absolute bond, simplex obligatio, in distinction from a conditional bond; an absolute estate, one that is free from all manner of conditions or incumbrance .. A rule is said to be absolute when, on the hearing, it is confirmed. (Emphasis added). See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary. 23.5 Unalienable -- A word denoting the condition of those things, the property in which cannot be lawfully transferred from one person to another. See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary. 24. It shows from these definitions that the State has an obligation to acknowledge the "RIGHTS" of this Sovereign to travel on the streets or highways in North Carolina. Further, the State has the duty to refrain from interfering with this "RIGHT" and to protect this "RIGHT" and to enforce the claim of this Sovereign to it. 25. Now if this Sovereign has the absolute "RIGHT" to move about on the streets or highways, does that "RIGHT" include the "RIGHT" to travel in a vehicle upon the streets or highways? The Supreme Court of the State of Texas has made comments that are an appropriate response to this question. 25.1 Property in a thing consists not merely in its ownership and possession, but in the unrestricted "RIGHT" of use, enjoyment and disposal. Anything which destroys any of these elements of property, to that extent destroys the property itself. The substantial value of property lies in its use. If the "RIGHT" of use be denied, the value of the property is annihilated and ownership is rendered a barren "RIGHT." Therefore, a law which forbids the use of a certain kind of property, strips it of an essential attribute and in actual result proscribes its ownership. (Emphasis added). See: Spann v. City of Dallas, 235 S.W. 513 26. These words of the Supreme Court of Texas are of particular importance in Idaho because the Idaho Supreme Court quoted the Supreme Court of Texas and used these exact words in rendering its decision in the case of O'Conner v. City of Moscow, 69 Idaho 37. The Supreme Court of Texas went on to say further; 26.1 To secure their property was one of the great ends for which men entered into society. The "RIGHT" to acquire and own property, and to deal with it and use it as the owner chooses, so long as the use harms nobody, is a natural "RIGHT." It does not owe its origin to constitutions. It existed before them. It is a part of the Citizen's natural liberty -- an _expression of his freedom, guaranteed as inviolate by every American Bill of "RIGHTS." (Emphasisadded). See: Spann supra. 27. PROPERTY 27.1 Bouvier's Law Dictionary defines; 27.1.1 Property -- The ownership of property implies its use in the prosecution of any legitimate business which is not a nuisance in itself. See: In re Hong Wah, 82 Fed. 623 28. The United States Supreme Court states: 28.1 The Federal Constitution and laws passed within its authority are by the express terms of that instrument made the supreme law of the land. The Fourteenth Amendment protects life, liberty, and property from invasion by the States without due process of law. 28.2 Property is more than the mere thing which a person owns. It is elementary that it includes the "RIGHT" to acquire, use and dispose of it. (Emphasis added). See: Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60, 74 29. These authorities point out that the "RIGHT" to own property includes the "RIGHT" to use it. The reasonable use of an automobile is to travel upon the streets or highways on which this Sovereign has an absolute "RIGHT" to use for the purposes of travel. The definitions in Title 49 Chapter 3 of the Idaho Code positively declare the "RIGHT" of this Sovereign to travel in a vehicle upon the streets or highways in Idaho. 30. MOTOR VEHICLE OR VEHICLE? 30.1 Motor Vehicle -- Motor vehicle means a vehicle which is self- propelled or which is propelled by electric power obtained from overhead trolley wires, but not operated upon rails. See: Idaho Code 49-301 (6) 30.2 Vehicle -- Vehicle means a device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a public highway, excepting devices moved by human power or horse drawn or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks. See: Idaho Code 49- 301 (14) 30.3 Street or Highway -- Street or Highway means the entire width between property lines of every way or place of whatever nature when any part thereof is open to the use of the public, as a matter of "RIGHT," for purposes of vehicular traffic. (Emphasis added). See: Idaho Code 49-301 (13) 30.4 The term "Motor Vehicle" may be so used as to include only those self-propelled vehicles which are used on highways primarily for purposes of "transporting" persons and property from place to place. (Emphasis added). See: 60 Corpus Juris Secundum ?1, Page 148; Ferrante Equipment Co. v. Foley Machine Co., N.J., 231 A.2d 208, 211, 49 N.J. 432 30.5 It seems obvious that the entire Motor Transportation Code and the definition of motor vehicle are not intended to be applicable to all motor vehicles but only to those having a connection with the "transportation" of persons or property. (Emphasis added). See: Rogers Construction Co. v. Hill, Or., 384 P.2d 219, 222, 235 Or. 352 30.6 "Motor vehicle" means a vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, or semitrailer propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used on a highway in "transportation," or a combination determined by the Commission, but does not include a vehicle, locomotive, or car operated only on a rail, or a trolley bus operated by electric power from a fixed overhead wire, and providing local passenger "transportation" similar to street-railway service. (Emphasis added) See: Transportation, Title 49, U.S.C.A. ?10102 (17) The Constitutions of the United States and the State of North Carolina guarantees this Sovereign the "RIGHT" to own property. The Supreme Courts of North Carolina and Texas have affirmed that the "RIGHT" to own property includes the "RIGHT" to use it while its use harms nobody. If that property is an automobile, it is included in the definitions of vehicle and motor vehicle in the Idaho Code Title 49 Chapter 3. And in the same Idaho Code Chapter, streets or highways are defined as the place where vehicles are used by the public as a matter of "RIGHT." Thus it shows that this Sovereign has the "RIGHT" to use a vehicle on the streets or highways in North Carolina. 31. Now if this Sovereign has the "RIGHT" to use a vehicle on the streets or highways in North Carolina, to what extent can the State of North Carolina regulate or diminish that "RIGHT?" There are some who maintain that specific performance is required of every Sovereign who uses a vehicle upon the streets or highways in North Carolina. Let us examine this contention in detail. Contract? 32. Specific performance is a term used to designate an action in equity in which a party to a contract asks the court to order the other party to carry out the contract which he has failed or refused to perform. Thus, if specific performance is expected, a contract must exist. The question then becomes: What are the terms of the contract and when was it executed and by whom? Since specific performance seems expected of every user of a vehicle on the streets or highways in North Carolina, the user of a vehicle seems one of the parties to the supposed contract. And since the State seems the party demanding specific performance, the State is the other party to the contract. So the supposed contract exists between the user of a vehicle and the State of North Carolina. When was this contract executed and what are its' terms? Some contend that when a user of a vehicle avails himself of the "privilege" of driving on public thoroughfares that he enters a contract with the State that requires him to abide with all the laws in the North Carolina General Statutes. Others contend that the contract is executed when a driver's license is obtained. We need now to figure out what is a contract. 33. A contract may be defined as an agreement enforceable in court between two or more parties, for a sufficient consideration to do or not to do some specified thing or things. Thus, a contract has four essential features: 33.1 It must be an agreement. 33.2 There must be at least two parties to the contract. 33.3 There must be a consideration. 33.4 There must be an obligation or thing to be done. 34. Several types of contracts exist, but all must contain the essential features listed. Contracts can be classified under three principal categories: 34.1 Express 34.2 Implied 34.3 Quasi 35. Quasi contracts, while being called contracts are not really contracts, will not be considered in this discussion of contracts but will be considered in a separation section later. Unilateral & Bilateral Contracts 36. There can also be unilateral and bilateral contracts that is presumed can exist under some or all the above headings. Let us examine each above types of contracts to see if the license obtained by this Sovereign falls under any of the categories of contract. 36.1 An express contract is one in which the agreement of the parties is fully stated in words, and it may be either written or oral, or partly written and partly oral. See: Bergh Business Law 30 36.2 A true implied contract is an agreement of the parties arrived at from their acts and conduct viewed in the light of surrounding circumstances, and not from their words either spoken or written. Like an express contract, it grows out of the intention of the parties to the transaction and there must be a meeting of the minds. See: McKevitt et al v. Golden Age Breweries, Inc., 126 P.2d 1077 (1942) 36.3 License -- Authority to do some act or carry on some trade or business, in its nature lawful but prohibited statute, except with the permission of the civil authority or which would otherwise be unlawful. See: Bouvier's Law Dict 37. With these definitions in mind, let us examine a driver's license to see if it is a contract. The driver's license itself is a small plastic card approximately 55 millimeters by 86 millimeters in size. It contains the words "North Carolina Motor Vehicle Driver's license"; the name, address, signature, and physical description of the user; a pair of identifying numbers; a photograph; and the signature of the director of the Department of Law Enforcement. Obviously, this cannot be an express agreement because there are no statements to constitute an agreement. Are there two parties to the "contract?" There are two signatures, but both are copies, thus invalidating the "contract" so there are no parties to the "contract." Is there a consideration? What has the State given this Sovereign in return for this Sovereign's obligation? Some may suggest that the State has given this Sovereign the privilege of driving on the streets or highways in North Carolina. But this Sovereign already has the "RIGHT" to drive on the streets or highways in North Carolina, and the State cannot require this Sovereign to give up a "RIGHT" to obtain a privilege. 38. An Iowa Statute that requires that every foreign corporation named in it shall, as a condition for obtaining a permit to transact business in Iowa, stipulate that it will not remove into the federal court certain suits that it would by the laws of the United States have a "RIGHT" to a permit dependant upon the surrender by the foreign corporation of a privilege secured to it by the Constitution and laws of the United States. Bouvier's Law Dictionary quoting Barron v. Burnside, 121 U.S. 186: 38.1 The full significance of the clause law of the land is said by Ruffin, C.J. to be that statutes that would deprive a Citizen of the "RIGHTS" of person or property without a regular trial according to the course and usage of the common law would not be the law of the land. (Emphasis added). See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary quoting Hoke v. Henderson, 15 N.C. 15, 25 AM Dec 677 39. It would be foolish for this Sovereign to exchange a "RIGHT" for a privilege since it would mean giving up valuable property in exchange for something having less value. Is it possible for this Sovereign to do such a thing? 39.1 Consent -- In criminal Law. No act shall be deemed a crime if done with the consent of the party injured, unless it be committed in public, and is likely to provoke a breach of the peace, or tends to the injury of a third party; provided no consent can be given which will deprive the consenter of any unalienable "RIGHT." (Emphasis added). See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary. 40. Thus, even if this Sovereign wanted to do so, he could not give up his "RIGHT" to travel on the streets or highways in North Carolina or exchange it for the privilege of having a driver's license. Thus, in exchange for the supposed obligation of this Sovereign, the State has given nothing. Thus, there is no consideration. 41. It may be contended that the seal on the driver's license is sufficient consideration by the State. It is true that under the common law, the question of consideration could not be raised concerning a contract under seal. The seal provided conclusive presumption of a consideration. Still, North Carolina has abolished by statute the common law presumption of consideration and this statute is binding upon all officers and employees of the State. So, though a seal may be present, it is not evidence of consideration in North Carolina. Of course, the document in question is a contrived and copied document and lacks validity in any case as a contract. 42. As to an obligation, since the license contains no statement of agreement, since there are no parties to any agreement, and since there is no consideration, there can be no obligation. The driver's license thus is not a contract since it fails to contain any of the four essential features of a contract. 43. Can the driver's license be an implied contract? The same elements must exist in an implied contract as exist in an express contract. The only difference is that an implied contract is not written or spoken and the elements of the contract are shown by the acts and conduct of the parties involved. With respect to this Sovereign, there was certainly no meeting of the minds else this brief would not result. It was never the intention of this Sovereign to give up constitutional "RIGHTS" to accept a privilege from the State. Such an action would be ridiculous. This could only be done in a socialistic state. There has been no implied agreement in a free society. It is possible that there were two parties to the supposed contract, the State and this Sovereign. There was no consideration in the implied contract for the same reasons that there was no consideration in the express contract. 44. An obligation is the thing to be done. It may be to pay money, to do work, or to deliver goods; or it may be to refrain from doing something that the person contracting had a "RIGHT" to do. Some may say that the State was obligated to allow this Sovereign to drive on the streets or highways in North Carolina and that this Sovereign was obligated to obey all the Statutes contained in the North Carolina General Statutes. It would be just as easy to say that the State could not be obligated to allow this Sovereign to travel on the streets or highways in North Carolina because they did not have the "RIGHT" or the power to prevent him from doing so. 45. If the State cannot prevent this Sovereign from his travels on the streets or highways in North Carolina, they do not have any discretion in the matter and do not have the choice of whether to obligate themselves or not. Thus, the obligation of the State cannot be to grant this Sovereign the privilege of travel on the streets or highways in North Carolina. The obligation of the State cannot be to refrain from prohibiting this Sovereign from his travel on the streets or highways in North Carolina since the State did not have the "RIGHT" to do this at first. 46. It is the contention of this Sovereign that the only obligation that this Sovereign incurs when using a vehicle upon the streets or highways in North Carolina is the Common Law obligation to refrain from any act that causes another person to lose life, liberty, or property. In complying with this obligation, this Sovereign does comply with many Statutes in the North Carolina General Statutes since they are, for the most part, only common sense rules by which this Sovereign avoids doing damage to others. 47. Still, this acquiescence to some Statutes of The North Carolina General Statutes should not be construed as evidence of a contractual obligation by this Sovereign. Neither should it be construed as acquiescence to all the Statutes of the North Carolina General Statutes or to any of them always. Instead, it is merely evidence of a want of this Sovereign to travel safely and to do harm to no one. 48. Thus, the actions of this Sovereign do not supply unambiguous evidence of a contract with the State. Instead, the actions can, with equal weight, be said to be evidence of the fact that this Sovereign was complying with Common Law requirement that he does harm to no one. The driver's license is not an implied contract because there is no consideration, there may be possibly be two parties, but there is no consideration, and there is not clear evidence of an obligation. Three of the four elements necessary for a contract are missing. 49. The question now becomes whether the driver's license application is a contract. In completing this document, the applicant makes several statements and signs the paper upon which these statements are written under oath. The statements concern the identity, physical description, address, ability and experience in operating a vehicle, and one statement on the physical condition of the applicant. None of the statements are as an agreement. 50. The application form contains the signature of the applicant and the signature of the person taking the oath of the applicant. The reverse side of the Application contains the results of a vision test and rudimentary physical examination with the results of a driving test. These results are signed by the examiner and not by the applicant. 51. Thus the application takes the form of an Affidavit instead of a contract. But let us see if the elements of a contract are present in the application. 51.1 There is no agreement. 51.2 There are not two parties. 51.3 There is no consideration. 51.4 There is no obligation. 52. Since none of the necessary elements of a contract are present, the application does not constitute a contract. 53. The only other document involved in obtaining a driver's license is the document, part of which is copied to make the actual driver's license. It contains, besides the information that is used in making the driver's license, the results of a vision test conducted by the driver's license examiner. 54. The applicant places his signature upon this form that is then copied by some photographic process. Other material is added including a photograph, signature of the Director of the Department of Law Enforcement and the driver's license is made of this composite. 55. Thus the license itself cannot be a contract because it is a contrived document. The form from which the driver's license is made cannot be a contract because, again, none of the elements of a contract are present. So if none of the documents executed by the driver when obtaining a license is a contract, then no contract can exist between the driver and the State as a result of obtaining a driver's license. 56. But the idea that the driver's license is a contract with the State is pervasive. It is a belief that is strongly held even by people in high places. So let us examine the driver's license as if it were a contract and see if it can withstand scrutiny. Not every offer made by one party and accepted by the other creates a valid contract. The outward form of a contract, either oral or written may exist, and yet the circumstances may be such that no contract was in reality created. Some circumstances that will cause an apparently valid contract to be void are: 56.1 Mistake either mutual or unilateral. 56.2 Fraud. 56.3 Duress. 56.4 Alteration. 57. This Sovereign obtained a driver's license upon the representation by the State that one's travel upon the streets or highways of the United States of America was a privilege. This Sovereign accepted this representation as true and did obtain a driver's license. 57.1 It has been shown, still, that an individual's travel is a "RIGHT" and not a privilege. Thus, a mutual mistake has been made, and the "contract" is void. See: Deibel v. Kreiss, 50 N.E.2d 1000 (1943) 58. But the General Assembly of the State who passed the Statutes contained in the North Carolina General Statutes are knowledgeable persons, many of whom are lawyers, and they undoubtedly knew at the time the law was passed that an individual's travel was a "RIGHT" and not a privilege. If this were the case, then the mistake would be unilateral. A unilateral mistake known to the other party is sufficient grounds to void a contract. 59. Fraud 59.1 Fraud may consist in conduct, and may exist where there are no positive representations, Silence where honesty requires speech, may sometimes constitute fraud. The rule that a man may be silent and safe is by no means a universal one. Where one contracting party knows that the other is bargaining for one thing, he has no "RIGHT" by silence to deceive him and suffer him to take an altogether different thing, from that for which he bargains. (Emphasis added). See: Parish v. Thurston, 87 Ind. 437 (1882) 60. If the driver's license is a contract, a case can be made for the contention that it was an agreement obtained by the State by fraud. 60.1 Fraud is a generic term which embraces all the multifarious means which human ingenuity can devise and are resorted to by one individual to get any advantage over another. No definite and invariable rule can be laid down as a general proposition defining fraud, as it includes all surprise, trick, cunning, dissembling, and unfair ways by which another is deceived. (Emphasis added). See: Wells v. Zenz, 236 P. 485 61. With respect to contracts, the following statements can be made: 61.1 However, in the field of contracts, there are certain standard tests for a claim of fraud which make it possible to define fraud, in connection with a contract as any trick or artifice whereby a person by means of a material misrepresentation creates an erroneous impression of the subject matter of a proposed transaction, and thereby induces another person to suffer damage computable in money. The misrepresentation may result from a false statement, a concealment, or a nondisclosure. The elements of a contractual fraud are the following: 61.1.1 A material misrepresentation, created by a statement, a concealment, or a nondisclosure. 61.1.2 An intention to defraud. 61.1.3 Reliance on the representation by the defrauded party. 61.1.4 Damage caused to the defrauded party as the result of his acting upon the representation. See: Bergh Business Law p. 56. 62. In view of the many decisions by high courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States, that one's travel is a "RIGHT" and not a privilege, it would be hard to defend the proposition that the General Assembly of the State of North Carolina was unaware of these decisions, particularly since many legislators are and were lawyers knowledgeable in such matters. In fact, when one considers the definition of streets or highways in Sections of the North Carolina General Statutes, the Evidence is conclusive that the legislature knew and knows that ones travels is a "RIGHT." 63. Therefore, the statements in the North Carolina General Statutes that a travel is a privilege and that a driver's license is necessary before one can travel constitutes a material misrepresentation of fact to this possessor of a driver's license. And since the legislature is and was aware of the fact that an individual's travels was not a privilege, but a "RIGHT," the statement that one's travels is a privilege, when applied to this Sovereign, constitutes a willful intention to deceive, and therefore, to defraud. 64. This Sovereign did rely upon the representations of the legislature that an individual's travels was a privilege when he obtained his driver's license, else he would not have obtained one. 65. This Sovereign did suffer damage as a result of his acting upon the representation of the legislature at least to the extent of the license fee. 66. In as much as all the necessary elements of fraud are present if the driver's license is considered a contract, the "contract" is void. DURESS 67. With respect to duress, Bergh, supra., supplies the following definition: 67.1 A party must consent to a contract of his own free will; free consent is an essential element of an agreement. Consequently, if he is coerced into signing a contract by fear induced by a threat to cause personal injury to himself or to some close relative, the contract will not be a real agreement and it will be voidable at his option. The threat of personal injury must be a threat to inflict immediate bodily injury or to institute a criminal prosecution against the person threatened or some close relative. 68. Since it was essential to this Sovereign in pursuing his occupation of common "RIGHT" to use a vehicle upon the streets or highways in North Carolina, and since the State of North Carolina threatens to and does prosecute persons in criminal actions for not possessing a driver's license, regardless of their status, this Sovereign did obtain a driver's license under duress. If then the driver's license is a contract, the contract is unenforceable and invalid because of this duress. 69. With respect to alterations, Bergh, supra., has the following comments: 69.1 Any material alteration in a written contract by one party without the consent of the other party gives this latter the option of treating the contract as discharged or enforcing it as it stood before the alteration. 70. If the driver's license is a contract, it is a written contract, at least to the extent that the Statutes of the North Carolina General Statutes are written. Each time that the General Assembly amends or modifies or adds to any of the Statutes of the North Carolina General Statutes, the terms of the contract are changed. Since this Sovereign then has the option of considering the contract as discharged, he then chooses to do so as of the first change in the North Carolina General Statutes following his application for a driver's license. 71. If it is contended that the driver's license is an implied contract, the "Statute of Frauds" comes into play. North Carolina has enacted a "Statute of Frauds." 72. In the following cases the agreement is invalid, unless the same or some note or memorandum of it, be in writing and subscribed by the party charged, or by his agent. Evidence, therefore, of the agreement cannot be received without the writing or secondary evidence of its contents: 72.1 An agreement that by its terms is not to be performed within a year from the making thereof. 72.2 ............. 73. Since the term of the driver's license contract is so many years and the contract is not written, the "Statute of Frauds" does apply and the contract is unenforceable. 74. The discussion up to this point has been concerned with bilateral contracts in which each party promises something to the other party. Is it possible that the driver's license is a unilateral contract? A unilateral contract is described as: 74.1 A unilateral contract is a one-sided contract in the sense that only one side makes a promise, and the other side performs an act for which the promise was given. See: Bergh, supra.. 75. Since the act expected by the State is obedience to the Statutes of the North Carolina General Statutes, what promise has the State offered in exchange for this act? The only promise that the State could make this Sovereign is the promise to allow him to travel on the streets or highways in North Carolina. Since this Sovereign already can do that as a matter of "RIGHT," the State can promise him nothing. Thus there is no consideration and a unilateral contract cannot exist. 76. Having shown that no contract exists between this Sovereign and the State, let us examine the proposition that a quasi-contract exists between this Sovereign and the State. 77. Quasi-Contract 77.1 A quasi-contract is an obligation springing from voluntary and lawful acts of parties in the absence of any agreement. See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary. 78. In order to establish the existence of a quasi-contractual obligation it must be shown: 78.1 That the defendant has received a benefit from the Plaintiff. 78.2 That the retention of the benefit by the Defendant is inequitable. See: Woodward Quasi Contracts 9. 79. Thus, if it is contended that this Sovereign must obey the Statutes in the North Carolina General Statutes because of a quasi- contract, it must be shown that this Sovereign has received a benefit from the State. But one's travels on the streets or highways of the State is not a benefit received from the State. It was a "RIGHT" that attached to this Sovereign at the moment of his birth and cannot be removed by the State. In this respect, no benefit has been received from the State, and thus a quasi-contractual obligation cannot exist with respect to this Sovereign. 80. It may be claimed that the Statutes of the North Carolina General Statutes are made pursuant to the police powers of the State and that every person in the State is obligated to obey them. 81. The police power is a grant of authority from the people to their governmental agents for the protection of the health, the safety, the comfort and the welfare of the public. In its nature, it is broad and comprehensive. It is a necessary and salutary power, since without it, society would be at the mercy of individual interest and there would exist neither public order or security. While this is true, it is only a power. It is not a "RIGHT?" 82. The powers of government, under our system, are nowhere absolute. They are but grants of authority from the people, and are limited to their true purposes. The fundamental "RIGHTS" of the people are inherent and have not yielded to governmental control. They are not the subjects of governmental authority. They are subjects of individual authority. Constitutional powers can never transcend constitutional "RIGHTS." The police power is subject to the limitations imposed by the Constitution upon every power of government; and it will not be suffered to invade or impair the fundamental liberties of the Sovereign, those natural "RIGHTS" that are the chief concern of the Constitution and for whose protection it was ordained by the people. 82.1 To secure their property was one of the great ends for which men entered into society. The "RIGHT" to acquire and own property, and to deal with it and use it as the owner chooses, so long as the use harms nobody, is a natural "RIGHT." It does not owe its origin to constitutions. It existed before them. It is a part of the Citizen's natural liberty -- an _expression of his freedom, guaranteed as inviolate by every American Bill of "RIGHTS." 82.2 It is not a "RIGHT," therefore, over which the police power is paramount. Like every other fundamental liberty, it is a "RIGHT" to which the police power is subordinate. 82.3 It is a "RIGHT" which takes into account the equal "RIGHTS" of others, for it is qualified by the obligation that the use of the property shall not be to the prejudice of others. But if subject alone to that qualification, the Citizen is not free to use his lands and his goods as he chooses, it is difficult to perceive wherein his "RIGHT" of property has any existence. (Emphasis added). See: Spann, supra.. 83. Where inherent, unalienable, absolute "RIGHTS" are concerned, the police powers can have no effect. The "RIGHT" to travel on the streets or highways and the "RIGHT" to own and use property have been described as inherent, unalienable, and absolute. Thus the police power cannot regulate this Sovereign's "RIGHT" to use a vehicle on the streets or highways in North Carolina. 84. If the police power of the State is permitted to regulate the travels of this Sovereign on the streets or highways in North Carolina, and if, through the action of these regulations or Statutes, this Sovereign is denied access to the streets or highways in North Carolina; a fundamental "RIGHT" of this Sovereign has been abrogated. 84.1 Where "RIGHTS" secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation that would abrogate them. (Emphasis added). See: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491 (1966) 85. The abrogation of unalienable "RIGHTS" by legislation or rule making is unconstitutional. 86. If further proof is needed to show that this Sovereign need not be licensed to travel on the streets or highways in North Carolina, it is provided in the following decisions: 86.1 A license fee is a tax. See: Parish of Morehouse v. Brigham, 6 So. 257 86.2 A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a "RIGHT" granted by the Federal Constitution. (Emphasis added). See: Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 87. Since a fee is charged for a driver's license and since one's travels on the streets or highways in North Carolina is a "RIGHT" guaranteed by the Federal Constitution, and by the LAW OF NATURE, it is not constitutional for the State to require this Sovereign to be licensed to travel. 88. Even the application for North Carolina Driver's License Form recognizes the "RIGHT" of some persons to travel without a license. North Carolina General Statutes recognizes categories of persons who are not required to be licensed in this State. Why is it then that the first demand made by the law enforcement personnel when making a traffic stop is: "Let's see your driver's license, registration, and proof of insurance," and not always politely, when the first question should be; "What is your status and are you required to have a driver's license?" 89. Can it be that there is a conspiracy afoot within the State to reduce all Sovereigns to a status of contract? Why else would a law enforcement person take a Sovereign to jail without even trying to discover if that Sovereign is exempt from the requirement of having a driver's license? 90. The question now becomes whether this Sovereign is required to obey any of the Statutes in the North Carolina General Statutes? It has been shown that this Sovereign has a "RIGHT" to travel on the streets or highways in North Carolina. So, any Statute that describes driving on the streets or highways as a privilege cannot apply to this Sovereign. Since the "RIGHT" of this Sovereign to travel cannot be abrogated, any Statute the operation of which would have the effect of denying access to the streets or highways to this Sovereign cannot be applied to this Sovereign. 91. Since violation of any Statue in the North Carolina General Statutes is classified as a "misdemeanor" that is punishable by a fine and six months in jail, and since putting this Sovereign in jail because of his use of the streets or highways that harms nobody would be an abrogation of his "RIGHT" to travel, none of the Statutes of the North Carolina General Statutes apply to this Sovereign. These contentions are supported by the Supreme Court of United States. 91.1 An Iowa statute that requires that every foreign corporation named in it shall as a condition for obtaining a permit to transact business in Iowa, stipulate that it will not remove into the federal court certain suits that it would by the laws of the United States have a "RIGHT" to remove, is void because it makes the "RIGHT" to a permit dependent upon the surrender by the foreign corporation of a privilege secured to it by the Constitution and laws of the United States. (Emphasis added). See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary quoting Barron v. Burnside, 121 U.S. 186 92. This decision is consistent with that in Miranda, supra, in which it was stated that where "RIGHTS" are concerned, there can be no rule making or legislation that would abrogate them. It is also consistent with the discussion in the following case. This case is a tax case, but the discussion on "RIGHTS" that it contains is appropriate. 93. Individual and a Corporation 93.1 There is a clear distinction in this particular between an individual and a corporation, and that the latter has no "RIGHT" to refuse to submit its books and papers for an examination at the suit of the State. The individual may stand upon his constitutional "RIGHTS" as a Citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His "RIGHTS" are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his "RIGHTS" are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their "RIGHTS." (Emphasis added.) See: Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 94. The Emphasized statement is also consistent with North Carolina Statute. In the Statute reads: 94.1 Common law in force. The common law of England, as far as it is not repugnant to or inconsistent with the Constitution or laws of the United States in all cases not provided for in these compiled laws, is the rule of decision in all courts in this state. 95. Since the Statutes of the North Carolina General Statutes cannot apply to this Sovereign, he becomes subject to the Common Law that maintains that he owes nothing to the public while he does not trespass upon their "RIGHTS." 96. Is it the contention of this Sovereign that because the Statutes contained in the North Carolina General Statutes do not apply to him that the Statutes are unconstitutional? Absolutely not. There is a class of persons in North Carolina to whom these Statutes apply without reservation. Members of this class include corporations and those who do the corporation business on the streets or highways in North Carolina. A corporation is the creation of the State. 96.1 A corporation is a creature of the State. It is presumed to be incorporated for the benefit of the public. It receives certain special privileges and franchises and holds them, subject to the laws of the State and the limitations of its charter. Its "RIGHTS" to act as a corporation are only preserved to it while it obeys the laws of its creation. (Emphasis added). See: Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914 p. 684 97. It is a person in the eyes of the law but it lacks character, no morals, no conscience. It's every activity must be directed and supervised by the State. Under the definition of "Due Process of Law", Bouvier's Law Dictionary states in part: 97.1 The liberty guaranteed is that of a natural person and not of artificial persons; Western Turf Assn. v. Greenberg, 204 U.S. 359 where it was said "a corporation cannot be deemed a Citizen within the meaning of the clause of the Constitution of the United States which protects the privileges and immunities of Citizens of the United States against being abridged or impaired by the law of a state." (See also 203 U.S. 243) 98. The Statutes in the North Carolina General Statutes are designed to direct the activities of the class of persons of which a corporation is a member. Corporations are absolutely bound by these Statutes. It is imperative that a conscienceless entity not be allowed to roam the streets or highways in North Carolina and jeopardize the Sovereigns. It is for this purpose that the Statutes of the North Carolina General Statutes were enacted and not for the control of a Free and Natural Sovereign. Conclusion 99. There is no Court in this Land that could lawfully execute an Order that would or could cause, or work to compel, One to become a servant or slave of any city, county or state without a conviction and with full Due Process of Law, and for any city, county, or state to pretend otherwise is an absurdity Tempest at Dawn - YouTube Uploaded by stevedancy on Mar 24, 2010 The real story of our nation's founding. Category: Entertainment Tags: us constitution constitution founding ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oa_n02UoJ6A - Cached .Play Video WND EXCLUSIVE IRS examining claim of HSBC whistleblower WND series prompted authorities, Senate report confirms massive fraud http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/irs-probing-claim-of-hsbc-whistleblower/ Ron Paul Round 1 Questioning of Ben Bernanke at Fed Hearing July 18, 2012 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNAwGxQNIO8 Corporation courts www.avoiceforchildren.com/sui-juris- basic.htm - Cached Sui Juris - Getting THE TRUTH in the Record Sui Juris - Getting THE TRUTH in the Record (Condensed Version) By Pamela and Will Gaston. The only way to get the Truth past the attorneys and judges is to plead ... familyrights.us/how_to/suijuris/sui_ juris.html - Cached Sui Juris- The Truth in the Record by Pamela Gaston A Process for the People to Access the Courts. Did you know there is no such thing as "Constitutional Rights"? Your Rights are given to you by God ... familyrights.us/how_to/suijuris/ suijuris.html - Cached Explainer: Why the LIBOR scandal is a bigger deal than JPMorgan Posted by Dylan Matthews on July 5 http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/07/05/explainer-why-the-libor-scandal-is-a-bigger-deal-than-jpmorgan/ http://elementsofhealth.webs.com/apps/videos/channels/show/3444955-smart-meters-dangers http://elementsofhealth.webs.com/newelectricmeterdanger.htm Smart Meter Dangers www.smartmeterdangers.org [Found on Google, Yahoo! Search] SmartMeterDangers.org provides educational and scientific information to the public about health effects and other problems related to wireless smart meters. Smart Meter Dangers http://www.smartmeterdangers.com/ [Found on Google, Yahoo! Search] LOADING. Smart Meter Radiation Risks - EarthCalm www.earthcalm.com [Found on Google, Yahoo! Search] Are Smart Meters health hazards? Smart Meter radiation emissions are far more serious than admitted, claim independent EMF studies. Smart Meter Q & A - Smart Meter Dangers www.smartmeterdangers.org [Found on Google] Dr. Johansson's letter re: SmartGrid / Smart Meter dangers to CPUC 7.9.2011. Dr. Olle Johansson writes to the California Public Utility Commission to detail the ... IMPORTANT INFO REGARDING SMART ... - Smart Meter Dangers www.smartmeterdangers.com [Found on Google, Yahoo! Search] SMART METERS. Are they dangerous to health and privacy? Dear Neighbor,. I am a writer and live in the 800 block of our neighborhood. I want to alert you ... "Smart" Meter Dangers Update: Scientific Proof of These Hazards ... consciouslifenews.com [Found on Google] Feb 10, 2012 ... The American Academy of Environmental Medicine called for a moratorium on smart meters until serious public health issues, detailed herein, ... NESARA- Restore America - Galactics News: Smart Meter Dangers: The ... nesaranews.blogspot.com [Found on Yahoo! Search] Over the past two years, there has been mounting medical and scientific evidence of the grave biological dangers to humans from so-called "Smart" Meter ... Public Health Physician Warns of Smart Meter Dangers | AirCrap.org aircrap.org [Found on Yahoo! Search] In this video, Dr. David Carpenter, a Harvard Medical School-trained physician, provide a warning about the dangers of Smart Meters. Public Health Physician Warns of Smart Meter Dangers, Stresses ... www.youtube.com [Found on Google] Apr 29, 2011 ... Maine's Smart Meter Safety Coalition (www.smartmetersafety.com) recently caught up with Dr. David Carpenter, a Harvard Medical ... Smart Meter Dangers - EMF Protection www.emfblues.com [Found on Yahoo! Search] Smart Meter Radiation Risks Dangers of Smart Meter Radiation . There is much controversy over the current installation of Smart Meters both in the USA and Canada. Are You Looking For? Smart Meter Smart Meter Bill Smart Meter Bill Increa Smart Meter Warning Stop Smart Meters Bc Smart Meter Bill Spike Elster Smart Meters Dan Smart Meter Health Dang Result Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next 480823 - Single axis EMF/ELF Meter - Extech Instruments 480823 - Single axis EMF/ELF Meter. Single axis electromagnetic field measurements (30Hz to 300Hz) http://www.extech.com/instruments/product.asp?catid=57&prodid=353 This sensor tis not SUpposecd togo over 100-book says it'll trip off cause of a Clear & Present Danger 7/20/2012 Smart meter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org [Found on Yahoo! Search] There are concerns regarding the cost, health, and privacy effects of smart meters. For example, the attorneys general of both Illinois and Connecticut have stated that ... Whole lotta Ppl being FRIED, esp TI's on The List please stop paying the queen get it yet,, when we are denied our rights under maritime laws from a foreign country called Washington DC on British of Columbia, AS YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS COME FROM YOUR SOVEREIGN CITEZEN OF YOUR STATE ,WHY DOSE ONE ;LEGAL AMERICAN NEED A ID FROM THE ELECTED AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES UNIONS OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT NOT PROTECTING YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO WORK AN LIVE WITH RESPECT ON AMERICAN SOIL OR YOU NOT A AMERICAN OF RESPONSIBILITY OF YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, SO YOU HAVE TO SIGN or verbally comply with and order to give THEM AWAY. Also try: george washington 1984 dvd, more... Search results George Washington (TV mini-series 1984) - IMDb Director: Buzz Kulik. . Actors: Barry Bostwick: Gen. George Washington ? Jaclyn Smith: Sally Fairfax ? Lloyd Bridges: Caleb Quinn ? Patty Duke: Martha Washington ... www.imdb.com/title/tt0086720 - Cached More results from imdb.com ? George Washington | 1984 (Part 2) - YouTube George Washington, a TV mini-series from 1984. This will have lots of parts. It will take some time for all of this to be put up. www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWIMcNlyN3U - Cached .Play Video More results from youtube.com ? George Washington 1984 - Image Results George Wa... George Wa... Stojo - G... Stojo - G... George Washington | 1984 (Part 1) - YouTube George Washington, a TV mini-series from 1984. This will have lots of parts. It will take some time for all of this to be put up. www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFtkxlMTnD0 - Cached .Play Video Obamacare Mandates RFID Chips: Is It True? http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=CPVED9CgcR4&feature=endscreen Are you a REAL AMERICAN! Two or more generations born in the USA Do you believe in your rights? Take the test here John Stossel Hosts Ron Paul 2012 (FULL) with Obama debate ... EDUCATE YOURSELF ON THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YcTtsqRens John Stossel interviews presidental hopeful Ron ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=sudDo15tCMQ - Cached .Play John Stossel - The Money Hole - YouTube John Stossel - The Money Hole ... 43:52 Watch Later Error John Stossel Hosts Ron Paul 2012 ( FULL) with Obama debate by ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6zM1WYhwPw - Cached .Play Video More results from youtube.com ? Video CAFR1 Home Page - Collective Government's True Wealth exposed CAFR1 - Walter Burien, since 1998 has diligently worked for you bringing forward into the light of day what you need to know about the collective scope of government ... cafr1.com - Cached Start your food now and trust no one but those who work at it with one that is raising for themselves,, never tell elected and public employees. 1 MILLION pounds of Food on 3 acres. 10,000 fish 500 yards ... Growing power seems to have a winning combo going. I underestimated what they are doing. Based on the information in these videos, IF true, then on 3 acres ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV9CCxdkOng .Play Video More results from youtube.com ? PART 2 - How 1 MILLION Pounds Of Organic Food Can Be Produced ... The response we received from our original story (How 1 MILLION Pounds of Organic Food Can Be Produced on 3 Acres) was outstanding, but at the same time created many ... wakeup-world.com/2011/07/26/part-2-how- 1-million-pounds... - Cached How 1 MILLION Pounds Of Organic Food Can Be Produced On 3 Acres. I came across this video of a man who has figured out a system to grow 1 million pounds of food on 3 acres each and every year. How are they doing this? wakeup-world.com/2011/07/14/how-1-million-pounds-of... - Cached I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY - Dr ... I CREATED AIDS to DELIBERATELY DEPOPULATE HUMANITY - Dr Robert Gallo Courtesy: Dr Leonard Horovitz [in the interests of extending Human Educational ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgiMqgjS-zM - Cached More results from youtube.com ? DO you believe in maritime law for the British government,, get a business license to the privlage to work on American soil by the British government democracy Smart Meters surveillance device spying on your home and family Jerry Day explains the horror show called "Smart Meters" now playing, in a neighborhood near you! Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LzRmdaS1QOY#! Legal Constitution law of American rights of state sovereignty, not A privilege of the contract of the united state or state corporation your strawman account www.yourstrawman.com your birth certificate registrar to England,banking act 1913.dept of 1933 Surrender of the Dark Cabal is Imminent The Empire is ... Published on Jun 2, 2012 by Marie4Ashley4Ever No description available. Category: Education Tags: Surrender of the Dark Cabal is Imminent The Empire is ... www.youtube.com/watch?v=6G4SzJUTezk - Cached .Play Video More results from youtube.com ?

homepage: homepage: http://www.oregontrackers.com
phone: phone: 5413361233
address: address: 1540