President Bush's chief counter-terrorism adviser Richard Clarke has revealed that the CIA under George Tenet attempted to recruit some of the 9/11 "Al Qaeda" terrorists prior to the attack of September 11, 2001, but that after the attempt failed, Tenet and his senior CIA staff covered up the botched recruitment effort. The revelation is yet one more nail in the coffin of what has become the most discredited U.S. government report since the infamous Warren Report on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963. In fact, the Warren Report received another blow after it was revealed that First Lady Jacqueline revealed in 1964 to historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. that she believed that Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson was behind the assassination of her husband in Dallas. The revelations by Mrs. Kennedy and Clarke show that the United States government cannot be trusted to investigate misdeeds carried out with the full knowledge and support of senior officials of the CIA and the White House. The 9/11 attack represents one such high-level government cover-up.
Clarke's recent revelations about CIA knowledge of Al Qaeda 9/11 cells prior to the 2001 attacks on New York and Washington merely takes one to the shallowest of depths of the rabbit hole of the intelligence world, highly-compartmented cells which carefully planned the attacks and how the mass media would cover the unfolding events.
The one individual who stands tall among those intelligence and law enforcement officers who was aggressively pursuing the criminal network that would carry out 9/11 was FBI counter-terrorism top man John O'Neill. Ever since the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, O'Neill's pursuit of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda had been dogged. After further terrorist attacks at the Khobar Towers barracks in Dharan, Saudi Arabia; the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania; and the USS Cole in Aden harbor, O'Neill's biggest problem was not Al Qaeda, it was resistance from top officials inside the U.S. government.
Read More:
 http://www.voltairenet.org/9-11-Unanswered-Questions-I
|
e-mail: 
Bought into what Oliver Stone spoon fed me. It made perfect sense. The head going back and to the left, back and to the left, back and to the left.
One day I came across the Zapruder film that you could download from a known "conspiracy website". I downloaded it, and put it into Adobe Premiere Pro (which I had ).
I watched the headshot frame by frame. The head does got back and to the left right before one frame shows it going violently forward and to the right. The human eye doesn't catch it in real time but anyone with editing software could clearly see it when they move the film frame by frame.
Oliver Stone would have clearly seen this when putting together his movie, but it didn't fit the narrative, so it was ignored. As I found out Stone ignored quite a bit that didn't fit his version of the story.
Granted the film JFK is a movie, its marketed to make money, not educate.
Maria Oswald claimed her husband had shot at a Federal Judge at his home in New Orleans the prior year but missed. She said that Oswald claimed "Americans are so stupid, they don't believe you can make a getaway on a city bus."
His coworker claimed Oswald too a long wrapped package to work the day of the Assassination . When questioned Oswald claimed they were curtain rods.
Whether you believe the official story or some CIA/Castro/LBJ story, the fact is, there are many facts that are conveniently left out of all the conspiracy versions because they don't fit the narrative.