Posted on May 19, 2011 by willyloman
by Scott Creighton
They couldn't be more obvious if they tried. Bail was denied Strauss-Kahn earlier when he was still in charge of the International Monetary Fund, but since he resigned that position earlier in the day, bail was magically granted today on pretty much the exact same conditions his lawyers asked for the last time they requested bail.
If this isn't proof that this country is corrupt to the bone, I don't know what is. A no-bail detainment for a wealthy member of society on a sexual assault charge based solely on the say-so of the alleged victim?
And then, if you wish to argue that the courts wanted to honor the victim and take her at her word, what does that say about the fact that they have now granted him bail, AFTER his resignation from the IMF? Even if this case is true, which I seriously doubt, but even if it is, doesn't this kind of manipulation coming from the court victimize her again?
This stinks of Twanna Brawley.