This is the second time the US is killing Bin Laden if my memory serves me right? G.W. Bush killed him before as I remember, years ago. But then there were videos of him coming out speaking. Was he dead from years ago? Was he killed now? Is he dead? And why does it even matter? Bin Laden is known to be working for the CIA for many years. How do we know he is not still working for them? And who cares. Anyone working with the CIA is not a person whom I look up to. So why do I care if the CIA agents are killing each other? One less CIA to go around. I really don't care if the US is killing the people they are in partnership with, like Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein or Momar Quadafi. These are multi billionaires who have a disagreement amongst themselves or they are just play acting.
The real question is why did the US, France, and UK chose the particular time that they did, to invade Libya? Right after the Fukushima nuclear accident and while it was still going on? Why did they choose to "kill" Bin Laden, if they really did, at this particular time? Why they want to destruct us and to move our energy and attention towards this issue? What are they really trying to cover up?
Looking at Indymedia itself, as independent as it may be, it is getting dragged into this topic fast. Many other topics and issues are going to go away and the Bin Laden story will take its place. We are not going to be talking about the EPA ending its testing of radiation fallout on our food and crops and drinking water, for example, and it will quietly just go away, since for the next few weeks we will be talking about Bin Laden. Just like the Libya conflict took over Fukushima. Even though the contamination is increasing. And a few years from now, 2-5 years, when cancer rates, lukemia, diabetis, heart problems are skyrocketing, nobody is going to remember why this is so. they will blame bad diet for example.
Was the time to wage war in Lybia chosen for a reason? Was the time of the "killing" of Bin Laden carefully chosen? You decide...