portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting united states

government | political theory

The New World Order, Centuries in the Making

The last indymedia article I published ended with the question: Who controls the CIA? Who is pulling the strings? I believe the answer is knowable. But those who try to discuss the real culprits are ridiculed or labelled mentally ill, they are not allowed press coverage, and they often end up dead.
The last indymedia article I published ( http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/05/22/18596843.php) ended with the question: Who controls the CIA? In Plausible Denial, lawyer Mark Lane explains how he proved in court that CIA employee E. Howard Hunt was involved, among others, in President Kennedy's assassination. The CIA theoretically is under the Executive Branch. The National Security Act of 1947 which established the CIA permits it to "perform such other functions and duties [other than the stated functions and duties] related to intelligence... as the National Security Council may... direct." This has been generously interpreted by the CIA as allowing them to do most anything in the name of national security. But murdering a popular president was not in the interest of the American people. Whose security does the CIA think national security refers to? Who are the CIA working for?

A few former CIA employees have written books describing how they were well paid and otherwise convinced to endanger or end the lives of innocent people concerned about their communities, to the benefit of the very few very powerful and very wealthy. (See for example Philip Agee's CIA Diary and John Perkins' Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. Mr. Perkins gives various clues that he was working for a CIA front company.) The suggestion is not that the very rich and powerful of various countries are working in concert with each other. Rather, as Mr. Perkins explains so well, the rich and powerful of the various countries are cajoled, usually paid off, to cooperate with CIA schemes. Perkins describes how western advisors would help a less-industrialized country decide it should embark on a huge infrastructure project such as building a new highway system, airport, or dam, which the country's people didn't need and couldn't afford. Financing would be arranged to benefit western interests and the country would become indebted to western banks, the IMF, and/or the World Bank. Interest payments ever after impoverish the nation while enriching western bankers. (Former World Bank Vice-President Joseph Stiglitz describes the same phenomenon in Globalization and Its Discontents.)

Certainly western financial interests are involved in reshaping the world to the detriment of most of its inhabitants. The ongoing economic crisis has been caused by bankers intentionally lending money to unqualified borrowers and by the financial speculation of experts. Yet banking insiders and giants such as Goldman-Sachs, Merrill Lynch, and Citigroup lost billions in the crisis. One doubts they intentionally sabotaged their own interests. So who is calling the shots?

Here's a little game. What do the following passages describe? Where are they taken from?

"The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers... ."
"We shall... establish huge monopolies, reservoirs of colossal riches, upon which even large fortunes [of the * public] will depend to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of the States on the day after the political smash... ."
"We are destroying the causes of your torment - nationalities, frontiers, differences of coinages."
"... all journals published by us will be of the most opposite, in appearance, tendencies and opinions, thereby creating confidence in us and bringing over to us our quite unsuspicious opponents, who will thus fall into our trap and be rendered harmless.
"... we shall set up our own, to all appearance, opposition... . Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards."
"... it is indispensable to trouble in all countries the people's relations with their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, BY THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES, by want, so that the [* public] see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else."
"The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces—are essential for the completion of the aforementioned plans. What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers."
"Around us again will be a whole constellation of bankers, industrialists, capitalists and - the main thing - millionaires, because in substance everything will be settled by the question of figures."
"The people will submit to this regime because it will know that upon these leaders will depend its earnings, gratifications and the receipt of all kinds of benefits."
"... we shall keep promising them to give back all the liberties we have taken away as soon as we have quelled the enemies of peace and tamed all parties.
"It is not worth while to say anything about how long a time they will be kept waiting for this return of their liberties... ."
"In every possible way we must develop the significance of our Super-Government by representing it as the Protector and Benefactor of all those who voluntarily submit to us."
"It must be remembered that the prestige of authority is lessened if it frequently discovers conspiracies against itself... ."

ANSWER: These are an excellent description of the implementation of the New World Order. The quotes are taken from The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. The Protocols, first published in Russia in the early 1900s, is only superficially anti-semitic. This is not to deny the real harm done to Jewish people as a result of the publishing of the Protocols. Deadly pogroms followed their publication, for example. But the Protocols do not describe Jewish customs, religion, or people. (Regarding references to a future king of the world, see The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail by Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln.) It simply uses words like "Jew" to refer to the aspiring controlling authority and works like "goyim" for the general public (replaced by * in my quotes). Even the newspaper of the rabid anti-semite Henry Ford states, "It would be possible... to remove all hint of Jewish authorship, and yet retain all the main points of the most comprehensive program for world subjugation that has ever come to public knowledge." "And whether the Protocols are judged as proving anything concerning the Jews or not, they constitute an education in the way the masses are turned about like sheep by influences which they do not understand." Dearborn Independent, July 24, 1920. The added anti-semitism in the Russian Protocols is an example of the Protocols' Divide and Rule principle.

So the New World Order predates the Reaganism and Thatcherism of the 1980s; it predates the CIA; it seems to be centuries old. We have been unable to pinpoint exactly who the NWO would benefit: not the world's people, not the American people nor the government, and not most financial interests, although they seem to be tools for the implementation of the NWO, and are currently well paid for it.

Who, then, is pulling the strings? I believe the answer is knowable. But those who try to discuss the real culprits are ridiculed or labelled mentally ill, they are not allowed press coverage, and they often end up dead.

In our discussion here, all possible culprits mentioned seem to be victims of the NWO. Have we looked everywhere? Where haven't we looked? What is taboo—banished from rational thought?

Conspiracy theories, for one! Yes, to get past this impasse, one must have a mind independent enough to be able to withstand the mass media induced revulsion at the idea that two or more people sometimes make plans to benefit themselves at the expense of others. There is an abundance of conspiracy theories used to explain the NWO: the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the Skull and Bones Society, the Illumanati. Other secret societies such as the Freemasons have been suggested in the past as being the "hidden hand" behind world events. (The guilty will be identified by their actions. To blame a group based on other characteristics of its members, such as religion, race, gender etc., contributes to the implementation of the Divide and Rule principle.)

Might all these secretive societies have something in common? What is their great secret? Probably not all members of a secret society know the secret. One joins the Freemasons, for example, ignorant of their great secret.

Protocol 5: "This... will serve... to sow discord in all parties, to dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal initiative which might in any degree hinder our affair. There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative; if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord."

One person can make a difference. But one individual cannot change the world alone. The secret? Open your eyes. Open your mind. Look up.


Post Script:
Dr. Jim Fetzer talks about how a very high level of technological know-how must have been employed in the 2001 World Trade Center attacks. This is the only explanation I know of which accounts for the strange debris left after the attacks.
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fymqxVQM8Ps&feature=channel
 link to www.youtube.com
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQJwB94_yY0&feature=channel_page


Before the 9/11 attacks was the US invasion of Panama. In 1989, the US military attacked Panama to oust former CIA asset President Manuel Noriega. (The CIA has no friends, only people it uses.) A strictly enforced news blackout prevented most reporting on the battle from being brought to the public, but descriptions of the action and the results of the action point to a level of technology never seen before having been used. Witnesses have also spoken about how people were rounded up and trucked away for questioning; how people staying in temporary camps were deprived of their rights and freedom; and the existence of mass graves. See The Panama Deception. This link is to one segment of this documentary.
 link to www.youtube.com