The BBC documentary can be seen here:
Definitely recommended, however, don't watch if you are a devout believer of 'explosives in towers' or anything like that. The scope of the programme is strictly Building Seven however the analysis applies equally to towers one and two - no explosives, 'thermite', 'thermate', lasers from space, tv-fakery or other. Includes footage and interviews that the 'CT's' did not show you.
The conspiracy theories that have wasted so much time have focused entirely on the events not on the hijackers. Now the 'no-plane' theories and the 'explosives' theories are fully debunked. As of yet though I am surprised that nobody has attacked Steven Jones for being a Mormon. Anyone who believes Jesus went to America is unlikely to be an expert about anything. Regardless, the 'CT's' have prevented any adult conversation about 9/11. I doubt that the CIA et al paid Dylan Avery, Steven Jones and the rest of the rag-bag 'CT's' but they should have done.
Interest in 9/11 is not going to go away, however, the grass-roots support that the daft CT's once had is now finito, with this BBC documentary closing the WTC 7 story, even without the final NIST report. Clearly the nineteen hijackers could not have done the do - their back-story doesn't add up, so hopefully those that care will perhaps be open to other possibilities to either a) al-whatever or b) inside-job. Option c) is that an entirely different group did the job, for reasons beyond what the CT's could ever imagine. Option c) is also beyond what the smug debunkers could ever imagine, so this story is far from over.
Although 'who' is the real question, there is a 'what' part of the story open to interpretation - Flight 93. Either the plane buried itself into the ground, into a hole about the size of your living room, or it was shot down for the debris to be spread out over a large area. The CT crowd have not done a good job on that aspect of the story even though very few individuals would have to be involved. The accepted story implies complete incompetence, shoot - down accounts for the debris field, the rushing air sound at the end of the CVR tape ands the excessive secrecy. The truth about 93 is a relatively low hanging fruit, with members of the air-force speaking about it as well as posting stories onto the interweb. The only thing is that truth is not the same thing as 'inside-job', the conclusion that CT's want you to get. It would be interesting to see a BBC programme on UA93, one that is done as a documentary, not propaganda, and afforded fair treatment like the programme on WTC 7.