portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting oregon & cascadia

animal rights | media criticism

What Killed Sea Lion B198?

Shortly before the ghastly discovery of six sea lion deaths in the traps up at Bonneville, another sea lion, branded B198, was captured in those same traps. He was transported with several others up to Tacoma, to be held and examined, and was then supposed to be transported to a life of captivity in a zoo. But B198 never made it out of Tacoma. He died in captivity, while being examined under anesthesia. Like the six sea lions found in the traps, B198 was a casualty of the irrational campaign to remove sea lions from their ancestral home on the Columbia.
If you've read corporate media reports, you can be forgiven for entertaining the erroneous idea that B198 was simply too fat to live. This is the impression being promoted by Wildlife officials, and by "reporters" who never bother to question anything they are told by government officials, and never bother to do their homework.

Oregonian "journalist" Michael Milstein (503-294-7689,  michaelmilstein@news.oregonian.com), for example, had this to say on the subject:

__________

"Meanwhile, a report released Wednesday did identify the likely cause of death for a sea lion trapped by state officials at Bonneville Dam in late April and transferred to Point Defiance Zoo and Aquarium in Tacoma. They said the 1,452-pound sea lion, the largest ever captured anywhere, died while sedated for a health screening because it was extraordinarily fat.
'Its extreme weight pressed down on its internal organs while under anesthesia, said Steven Jeffries of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
'It was so obese - so fat - that its head went back into the fat rolls of its body,' Jeffries said.
Nearly five inches of fatty blubber covered the animal's sternum. Its incredible weight can be attributed to the high fat content of the salmon it was eating at Bonneville Dam, Jeffries said.
Sea lions attempt to put on as many pounds as possible before heading to their breeding grounds in the summer, where males spend little time eating because they devote full attention to maintaining their territories, he said."
__________

At first glance, it almost seems as though Milstein has evidence to back his theory up. A "report released Wednesday," and a couple of quotes from a WDFW spokesman both seem to be indicating that the animal was simply so fat that it died.

Unlike Milstein, however, I actually READ the "report released Wednesday." He is referring to a document entitled "Animal Care Committee review of California sea lion B198 mortality during health screening." This report is a careful examination of what really happened to B198. It does not, in fact, say that B198 died "because it was extraordinarily fat," as Milstein asserts. Instead, the report says that the animal died because he was kept under anesthesia for an extraordinarily long time. In other words, its death was the result of human error. By extension, it died as a result of the trapping program -- a conclusion that Steven Jeffries, the WDFW spokesoman quoted in the article, is understandably trying very hard to distract us from. As a journalist, it was Milstein's job to check into what Jeffries was saying. Milstein, like so many other corporate media reporters discussing this issue, failed to do so. Here is a direct quote from the Animal Care Committee report, which Milstein either did not read, or chose to misrepresent:

_________________


"The anesthesia records for the 10 animals handled at PDZA indicate that the duration of anesthesia ranged from 15 to 52 minutes. The longest duration of anesthesia was that of B198 (at 52 minutes) which resulted in mortality."

________________


While the report does mention the animal's weight as a contributing factor in the death (because such a large animal should not have been kept anesthetized for so long), it clearly indicates that the cause of death was anesthesia, and not weight. It also says nothing of weight "pressing down on internal organs," or heads "disappearing into fat rolls." That part was poetry added by a WDFW spokesman trying to avoid blame. Why does the corporate media focus on the animal's size, rather than the improper administration of anesthesia? (Could it be that the role of the corporate media in our society is to always justify and extol the government's position on every issue? Say it ain't so.)

The report recommended the following, to prevent further deaths in custody:

_________


"That we limit the duration of gas anesthesia to 30 minutes for animals weighing less than 454 kg (1000 pounds), and that for animals weighing greater than 454 kg (1000 pounds) that the duration of gas anesthesia be limited to 20 minutes."

_________

Again, while weight was a factor, it was not the cause of death. If B198 had been left alone out in the Columbia where he belonged, he would not have died. His weight would not have killed him. On the contrary, it would likely have been an advantage to him, once he reached his summer grounds in the south, as he likely would have in less than a month. Instead, he was trapped, hauled away to Tacoma, interred in a concrete holding cell, strong-armed by 7 people intent on performing medical tests whether he wanted them or not, and then placed under dangerous anesthesia that killed him. According to the report, "The animal was sedated with midazolam at an estimated dose of 0.15 mg/kg, given by intramuscular injection and then anesthetized with isoflurane gas via face mask. During anesthesia it experienced respiratory distress and stopped breathing."

It bears repeating: The animal's weight was only a factor in his death in that he should not have been kept under anesthesia for so long. It was the anesthesia, and not his weight, that caused his death.

Incredibly, he went through all of this so that fishermen can excuse their excessive over-predation on endangered fish in the Columbia. All of the sea lions who have died so far as a result of this program have been sacrificed so that humans can avoid changing their own unsustainable behavior. Mr. Jeffries and the WDFW know this. They simply cannot admit it, without cutting into their bread and butter. (The WDFW and the ODFW are funded through hunting and fishing.) I have already spoken volumes on what is really causing the salmon on the Columbia to move toward extinction, and it is not sea lions. Until we face our own behavior and stop scapegoating sea lions, the salmon are doomed and more sea lions will suffer and die for no reason. We can stop the killing. We need to choose to save sea lions AND salmon, because both are native, natural, important species in the Columbia river ecosystem, and both are worthy of dignity and respect. The way that we can save them both is simply to face the truth: WE are driving the salmon toward extinction. We must redesign the dams, and stop preying on endangered species if we really want to save them. It's that simple.

If you know anything 13.May.2008 16:50

Concerned Citizens for Columbia River Safety (for ALL beings SeaLionTipLine@gmail.com

Please pass the word: If you know ANYTHING about the deaths of the six sea lions in the traps at Bonneville, or about any other sea lion incidents, contact the confidential sea lion tip line at  SeaLionTipLine@gmail.com.

Others? 14.May.2008 06:47

Pinniped

Does anyone know what happened to the one found near the I-5 bridge? Why is no one saying anything about that in the corporate media anymore? Surely they now know what it died of. If it was gunshots, perhaps they are covering for the fishermen.

Also, I heard a rumor that another one was found near a dock on the Willamette. People saw it, but did not report it to anyone.

Keep your eyes out. People can be stupid, ignorant louts, and we need to protect the world from our violent and ignorant kin.

Dams and fishing killing salmon, not sea lions 14.May.2008 09:42

!

The salmon are disappearing because people would not stop killing them. Imagine! And endangered species, supposed to be protected, and people are out there killing them! Why is this not illegal???

If Baird and Hastings continue want to pass a law making it legal to kill sea lions, then I say we start pressing for a law that makes it ILLEGAL for humans to EVER kill ANY endangered species. INCLUDING SALMON. I mean, don't we already have a law like that? The Endangered Species Act? Why are fishermen still out there killing 12% of the run, and then crying like babies because sea lions are daring to hunt their natural prey? The sea lions aren't even taking HALF what fishermen are taking. I am so sick of fishermen blaming sea lions for the lack of salmon! Do they not get the irony??? Sitting there in front of their big ol fishing boats, filled with all their fishing tackle and nets, on their way out to kill any fish they can get, giving interviews to the press about how important it is that we kill sea lions??? Do they think they represent the public or something? They do not.

I say it also become a law that ANYTHING that kills 50 percent or more of an endangered species must be stopped. That would only be humans, because humans are the only species that is destructive enough to wipe out 50 percent or more of an entire species. And, that means the dams would have to go, because they are taking out considerably more salmon than that.

It is dams and greedy fishermen who are killing off all the salmon. And none of them are nearly as cool as sea lions.