portland independent media center  
images audio video
composted article reporting global

election fraud | police / legal

CA. Secretary of State criminally rejects filings on Judgment Lien file No 07-7121163917

since terminating william e.thomson ceo for criminal conspiracy(see atricle)
the ucc filing officer rejects paper walk in filings in contempt of the record and irs audit.
and seeks to block recovery of social security pension funds embezzled since 1993.
Court Judgment
Court Judgment
jerry brown is telling the secretary of state to reject our ucc judgment lien filings against himself..
until terminated he was relying on william bill thomson to control me and keep me broke and without food or medical care untill i died.
this was the reason for terminating mr thomson nunc pro tunc october 15, date of my malicious arrest by placer county and jerry brown.

jeery brown has corrupted and is making all decisions for the secretary of state. and filing 5 malicious lawsuits againt me to evade the eviction of himself and friends form oakland properties and block irs audit.
jeery brown is a debtor felon and not the attorney general.

alvin

homepage: homepage: http://pennibancpost.blogs.com destroyed by William Thomson Jerry Brown, Hillary
phone: phone: 510-314-3178,
address: address: 9410 locust street Knights Landing, Ca.


You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. 25.Feb.2008 18:16

Inigo Montoya

The purported court judgment you have posted is neither a judgment nor even an official court document of any kind. It is something you have cooked up yourself in Microsoft Word.

This is obvious to anyone who downloads it.

Thank you for debunking your own claim.

blog postings need to do historical research 25.Jul.2008 23:54

Pellettieri

Obviously Inigio Montoya has not done his/her research. The default judgments in this case are valid. Weather or not the purported posted judgment is in fact one of the default judgments taken by the plantiffs makes no difference. The fact of the matter is default judgments were taken in this case against the defendants.