portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts united states

election fraud | imperialism & war

The Israeli Defense Company That Tallies the Iowa Caucus

The Iowa caucus results were tallied in 2004 by a company
that is headed by a man whose company was bought
by Elron Electronics, the Israeli defense firm
The Israeli Defense Firm That Tallies the Iowa Caucus

Posted By: ChristopherBollyn <Send E-Mail>
Date: Monday, 31 December 2007, 8:10 a.m.

The Iowa caucus is only a few days away and the nation's attention
will be directed to the results, which signify the beginning
of the U.S. presidential race. But does anyone watch
who tallies the results of the Iowa caucus?

The Iowa caucus results were tallied in 2004 by a company
that is headed by a man whose company was bought
by Elron Electronics, the Israeli defense firm.
I suspect that it will be the same this year.
Don't expect to see any grassroots political activists
doing the tally in Iowa.

The Israeli defense establishment takes care
of that part of the American "democratic" election process.

VOXEO

In the summer of 2004, I first learned that a foreign and out-of-state
company using Interactive Voice Response (IVR) technology
tallied the Iowa caucus results.

The system used to tally the 2004 Iowa caucus results was provided
by a company called Voxeo, which was apparently based
in Orlando, Florida. (Yellow flag goes up in the mind
of those familiar with Orlando and electronic vote fraud history.
See Bollyn article on Wang below.)

The calls from the nearly 2,000 caucus centers in Iowa
went to a Voxeo call center in Atlanta, Georgia.

On January 31, 2005, I wrote to Michelle Bauer, Iowa's
Secretary of State with some questions about the use of Voxeo,
a foreign company located in Florida,
to tally the results of the Iowa caucus:


==========

Subject: How was the Iowa Caucus Tallied?

Dear Sirs,

When I visited the headquarters of the Democratic Party
in Des Moines last summer, I learned that the tally of the Iowa
caucus had been "out-sourced" to a company in Atlanta, Georgia.

What this means is that the tallying of the Iowa caucus results
was done over the telephone, using the touch-tone buttons,
to enter the results from each caucus location...

I am interested in how this was done, and why.
Why did the Democratic Party allow the crucial tally
of the caucus results to be done by a company in Atlanta?
Don't they trust their own math skills?

Can any of you provide any information about this matter?

Kind regards,

Christopher Bollyn

--------------------------

I wrote this note back to Mr. Milligan:

Dear Mr. Milligan,

I am responding to you about how the caucus results for the Iowa Democratic Party were tallied on the night of the nation's first caucus.
After checking my sources, I can assure you that it is correct that
an out-of-state telephone/computer system tallied the Iowa precinct results.

The system used was provided by Voxeo Corporation based
in Orlando, Florida.
The calls went from Iowa to a call center in Atlanta, Georgia.

See:  http://www.voxeo.com/

This information was first provided to me last August
by John McCormally, Communications Director for the
Iowa Democratic Party in Des Moines, Iowa.

Today I called Voxeo (800) 305-5771 in Orlando and although
I didn't go into detail, the receptionist confirmed that Voxeo
had conducted the telephone tally
of the Iowa Democratic Caucus results.

How is it that you don't know that?

McCormally told me that chairmen were selected in all
1,993 precincts and these chairmen called in on touch-tone phones
and after giving their PIN number, were able to enter the results
from their precinct using the touch-tone number pad.

I'm not going to go into great detail at this point, but this procedure
of using an out-of-state computer company to tally the precinct results
for the Iowa Democratic Caucus lacks the transparency and
openness that one might expect in this exercise in grass-roots poll.

Clearly, if someone wanted to adjust the results, it would be
the easiest thing to do to do it through this computer system
in Orlando, Florida. The Democrats in Iowa would never be aware of it,
regardless of their math skills, unless the paper results
were carefully audited in an open and honest manner.

Christopher Bollyn

------------------------------------

THE ISRAELIS & VOXEO

Now, who really is Voxeo, and why are the Iowa caucus results tallied by them? I don't know if the 2008 Iowa results
will be tallied in the same way, but I wouldn't doubt it.

Voxeo is headed by Jonathan Taylor, who is the company's
President and CEO. This is what his Voxeo webpage says about him:

Jonathan combined his experience in both business operations
and technology innovation to found Voxeo in 1999.
Under his guidance, Voxeo has seen triple-digit revenue growth
for four consecutive years and has been profitable since January, 2004.
Prior to Voxeo, Jonathan founded and helped bring three additional
software and infrastructure service companies to profitability.

>From 1995 to 1997, Jonathan was the founder and President
of InterResearch and Development Group (IRdg), Inc.
IRdg created and licensed iPost - the first internet powered
OEM unified messaging solution - to leading telecommunications
providers including Ericsson, Motorola and Unisys.

IRdg was acquired by Elron Electronic Industries (Nasdq: ELRN)
subsidiary MediaGate in 1997.

There you have it. Jonathan Taylor's company, which he founded,
was taken over by Elron Electronic Industries,
the Israeli defense high tech company:

In its early days, Elron focused on defense, particularly electronics
and avionics, as well as the emerging medical and technology sectors.
In 1966, Elron founded Elbit, which combined the expertise
of the Ministry of Defense-Research Institute in special
computer design with Elron's experience in electronic product design,
manufacture and management.

Source:  http://www.elron.net/default.asp?PageID=203

This is important information that Americans need to know
and which they will not find in the Zionist-controlled media
in the United States. It needs to be understood that the entire
election process in the United States is a fraud.
More than that, it is a fraud that is being perpetrated by the Israeli
defense establishment on the na´ve and gullible American public.

The sine qua non of an honest and transparent election process
is the open counting of the votes by the voters themselves
in each polling station in front of the open eyes of other citizens
and members of the media. Any compromise in this most
fundamental and essential process which acts to remove
the citizenry from the vote-counting process
simply cannot be accepted.

This is what Americans MUST get back to, in every polling station
in the nation: paper ballots that are hand counted in front of the public.

Nothing else will do to protect their democratic franchise
in the United States - NOTHING.

========
Christopher Bollyn is an independent journalist who needs
the support of his readers. If you value his research and writing,
please send a donation via PayPal to:

 bollyn@bollynbooks.com

No direct un-apportioned tax confirmed
by the US Supreme Court rulings.
GEORGE ORWELL'S 1984 :
'You are a slow learner, Winston,' said O'Brien gently.
'How can I help it?' he blubbered. 'How can I help seeing what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four.'
'Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane.'

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
-Goethe