Green claims by "big box" stores lack support
TerraChoice.com just released a report and found at least one problem with nearly every one of the 1,753 green marketing claims made by "big box" retail stores in the U.S. and Canada. Only ONE claim stood up to basic probing by TerraChoice, an environmental marketing agency.
Greenbiz.com highlighted a startling new report on environmental marketing and found the corporations exagerating their "Greenness."
That's a sad state of affairs, one that stands to undermine, if not obliterate, the recently resurgent markets for environmental products and services. And it is all too reminiscent of the green markets of the early 1990s, when claims of biodegradable trash bags and recyclable polystyrene foam egg cartons, among many other things, were found to be misleading, if not outright fraudulent.
Is it any wonder that consumers are skeptical of green marketing claims?
We can do better -- lots better -- and TerraChoice deserves our thanks for unearthing its admittedly painful findings. If companies are unable to make basic claims about simple products, like cosmetics and cleaners, how can we expect them to be honest and forthcoming about more complex and impactful purchases, like computer and cars?
READING, Penn., Nov. 19, 2007 -- The overwhelming majority of environmental marketing claims in North America are inaccurate, inappropriate, or unsubstantiated, according to a comprehensive survey released today.
According to a report by TerraChoice Environmental Marketing, "greenwashing is pervasive," with the risk that "Well-intentioned consumers may be misled into purchases that do not deliver on their environmental promise."
In the spring of 2007, TerraChoice sent research teams into six category-leading "big box" retail stores with instructions to "record every product-based environmental claim they observed." In all, the teams examined 1,018 consumer products bearing 1,753 environmental claims. Products ranged from cleaning and personal care products to televisions and printers.
Of the products examined, "all but one made claims that are either demonstrably false or that risk misleading intended audiences," according to the report.
TerraChoice identified six types of labeling problems. They include claims that had no proof to back up their assertions, claims that are so vague that their meaning is likely to be misunderstood by consumers, claims that are irrelevant to their respective products, claims that are technically true but distract consumers from a product's real problems, and claims that misuse or misrepresent certification by an independent authority.
"We are now entering a phase where the consumers have a lot more access to information than they have ever had in the past," says Scot Case, vice president of TerraChoice. "I think the marketing departments haven't quite realized what strong demand there is for that kind of transparency. So I would hope that this six sins of greenwashing will wake people up -- that people are expecting a higher level of scrutiny than they used to need for these kinds of claims."
The report offers suggestions for both marketers to avoid each of the six "sins" in the future, as well as to consumers to help them ask tough questions when they see marketing claims.
Misleading consumers on environmental marketing claims can have significant impacts, says Case. "I think the real danger is if people are successful with their greenwashing efforts, then the truly green, the truly innovative companies -- the ones that have really figured out how to reduce their carbon footprint, how to produce a nontoxic product, how to make products out of renewable materials that can be reused and are really -- the truly innovative products are going to lose out."
Read the full report at www.TerraChoice.com
contribute to this article
contribute to this article
add comment to discussion
view discussion from this article