portland imc - 2007.10.28 - Who Owns the World - The Hidden Facts Behind Landownership

what?

28.Oct.2007 08:36

informationclearinghouse.com ??

Is is a serious statement?
I've tried a search @ informationclearinghouse.com and
"Who Owns the World - The Hidden Facts Behind Landownership"
Brings only null listings.
I've relied upon Information clearinghouse for years. Is this true?
Oh, by the way, the Queen of England, when she came to dance on the graves of the VT government massacre, it sure would have been nice to see her go up into a puff of smoke when water was thrown on her.
Inbred psychopaths, all of them. They only own the myth we are led to follow.

Wealth in the world

28.Oct.2007 10:50

anon

link

Good post. People who have problems with conspiracy theories should take a look at this, because things start to make sense when you think of how the super rich operate outside the way we're taught to think about it. The Queen of England is one example (by the way, as far as the Queen is concerned, our bodies are property of the British Empire according to British Maritime Law).

Consider the Rockefeller empire. At it's height (I think around 1907), Rockefeller entities' income equalled 1/64 of total U.S. GDP. With today's numbers of a $13.3 trillion GDP, that would mean over $200 billion in a year. Where did that money go? Into a vast network of "private foundations" and "charitable organizations" which dole out money and influence according to how the last JD grandson, David Rockefeller, sees fit. So even though Forbes will tell you he is worth $2 billion, the power of his purse is in the trillions.

This way we keep our eyes focused on people like Bill Gates and Donald Trump. The power of the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Windsors, Bauers, Hohenzollerns, Oppenheimers, and a lot of other people whose fortunes date back to the time of royalty. What many of these fortunes share in common is an origin in either royally granted monopolies (Von Thurn und Taxis family) or direct exploit of empirial industry in Africa, Asia, India, etc. Their fortunes are derived largely from imposing slave like working conditions and brutal repression of underdeveloped tribes. This is why many prefer not to end up on those billionaire lists that Forbes publishes (they have the power to opt out) or, if their ego gets the best of them, as with Rockefeller, they make sure they get listed down at the bottom along with guys like Steven Spielberg and David Geffen.

So when you hear liberal gate keepers ranting about "corporate control" it's really just a ruse. The people calling the shots are not corporate, but private individuals and old money families who maintain an incestuous relationship behind the scenes of world affairs. In the old days, the press would actually attack people like Rockefeller and Nate Rothschild for their obvious interference with democracy, but now the media is bought up and CEO stooges get the blame while the real power brokers operate behind the scenes.

if the queen owns everything, why am i paying rent to somebody else?

28.Oct.2007 15:07

i'll just send it to the queen instead, that'll work

link

Elizabeth's supposed ownership of entire countries is an abstraction retained from centuries ago for the sake of tradition, and has nothing to do with the actual disposition of the land, which is owned in other abstract senses by other people, who buy it, sell it, and manage it in the conventional ways people would expect. This article has about as much to do with land ownership, as practiced by actual human beings in the 21st century, as "patriot militia" theories of "sovereign citizenship" have to do with American law.

regions

topic pages

genres

actions

resources

global imc
network:

Who Owns the World - The Hidden Facts Behind Landownership