Blair, the last day – goodbye to ole Blue Lies!
Today's the day! Anthony Charles Lynton Blair ceases to be our lord and master. What will he do now?
Blair - goodbye to ole Blue Lies!
Today's the day! Anthony Charles Lynton Blair ceases to be our lord and master. What will he do now - become an envoy for peace? This can hardly be expected of a man who was once portrayed by Rory Bremner as being in `Warmongers Anonymous`. He took Britain to war more often than any Prime Minister in living memory. There was Iraq in 1998; Kosovo (and Serbia) in 1999, Sierra Leone in 2000, Afghanistan in 2001 and then the current disaster in Iraq in 2003 - both of the last two wars are ongoing. Is this the sort of a man who is likely to bring peace to the Middle East?
How about the lucrative lecture circuit? That sounds more like our Tone; the BBC lunchtime news of Tuesday 26th June reported that he could expect $150,000 a time for each talk in the USA - with around 25 speeches annually that's nearly $4 million a year. The thousands of victims of his warmongering will probably be lucky to get that between them in compensation payments for ruined lives.
Remember `Yo, Blair` at the G8 summit in Russia on 17th July 2006?
There is a book `Yo, Blair! ` By Geoffrey Wheatcroft, here reviewed by William Podmore:
In this brief and brilliant essay, journalist Geoffrey Wheatcroft tells the story of Blair's premiership, focusing on his disastrous alliance with George W. Bush.
Wheatcroft shows how Blair pursued this alliance against Britain's interests and against the views of the British people. Blair lied to us that Saddam Hussein was a `serious and current threat' to Britain. Blair lied to us that he was pursuing diplomacy, but as early as July 2002 a Downing Street memorandum decreed, "We should work on the assumption that the UK would take part in any military action."
Even Thatcher had warned that we should only "use our force to preserve our way of life. We do not use it to walk into other people's countries, independent sovereign territories." If wherever there is an evil regime, "there the United States shall enter, then we are going to have really terrible wars in the world."
Wheatcroft rightly argues that Bush and Blair should have focused on destroying Al Qa'ida. Instead they attacked the Afghan people and their government, maximising the number of enemies.
On the EU Constitution, Blair said in May 2005, "Even if the French voted no, we would have a referendum. That is a government promise." Just three weeks later, the French voted no and he broke that promise: "there is no point in having a referendum, because of the uncertainty it would produce."
Blair pledged that the EU's scheme for devolution would strengthen the Union between England and Scotland. Secessionists saw that it would help them to break up Britain.
All these facts raise the question, why has this government (like all other previous governments) consistently, systematically, produced results that are the opposite of what they proclaim to be their intentions? Is it just because they are pathological liars? No, it's because they represent only a minority ruling class that is consistently, systematically, opposed to the interests of the majority of Britain's people, and this class could not safely maintain its rule if it proclaimed that its interests were opposed to the majority's interests.
In September 2006 Blair promised the Labour faithful - all too apt a phrase - that he would dedicate his last months in office to peace between Israel and Palestine. Blair says, "I only know what I believe." Think about it - it's the wrong way round! But neither God nor history is his judge; in a democracy, we would be.
Grovel to Bush, grovel to the EU, grovel to the über-rich. Is this how we want an independent sovereign country to behave? Wheatcroft sums up Blair's rule, `the most dishonest and disastrous prime ministership of modern times'.
`The most dishonest and disastrous prime ministership of modern times'? Yes, I would say so. Could Gordon be any worse? Today `Gangster` Gordon takes over from `Torturing Tony` and I'm afraid, as George Galloway would put it, they are two cheeks of the same arsehole.
Tony and Cherie can look forward to a move into a £3.6 million house in fashionable Connaught Square while Brian Haw, an erstwhile neighbour of Tone, will continue to sleep in a more modest abode in Parliament Square - under the stars.
Blair's property deals
1980: Mapledene Road, Hackney, bought £40,000, sold 1986 £80,000
1983: Myrobella, Trimdon village, nr Sedgefield, bought £30,000
1986: Stavordale Road, Islington, bought £120,000, sold 1993 £200,000
1993: Richmond Crescent, Islington, bought £375,000, sold 1997 £615,000
1997: 11 Downing Street - rent free flat next door to prime minister's traditional residence
2002: Clifton, Bristol, two flats bought for £525,000 in total
2004: Connaught Square, Bayswater, bought £3.6m
2007: Bayswater. Two-bed house behind Connaught square property, bought £800,000. The Blairs plan to join buildings together to create extra space
Memoir fees and hols
In addition Tone can expect an advance of around a million pounds for his memoirs and a very lucrative series of fees on the lecture circuit.
Only have a week in Southend or Blackpool to look forward to? Have A Tony Blair holiday - they're free - if you know how to wangle them!
1997: Tuscany, guest of Geoffrey Robinson, Labour MP and businessman.
1998: Tuscany, Prince Girolamo Strozzi, law professor and family friend.
1999: Tuscany, Vannino Chiti, Tuscan president.
2001: Ariege, Southern France, Sir Martin Keene, high court judge and family friend.
2003 - 06: Barbados, Sir Cliff Richard, singer.
2004: Sardinia, Silvio Berlusconi, Italian premier and media mogul.
2006: Barbados, Sir Anthony Bamford, JCB boss and Tory donor.
2007: Miami, Robin Gibb, Bee Gees member.
Should Indymedia organise a whip round for the Blairs?
Word count 971 words
address: Edinburgh, Scotland
contribute to this article
add comment to discussion