portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts global

imperialism & war | indigenous issues

*War and Thievery in The Guise of Humanitarianism*

... Is there actually conflict in Sudan? Yes. Will intervention by the West, NATO or a puppet African Union resolve the core issues in this struggle? Probably not because the last thing the Europeans wants is real and lasting peace and stability in the region. Is there conflict in the Horn of Africa? Yes. Does this conflict threaten to destabilize the whole region? Yes. Is this conflict because of the megalomania, ineptitude and corruption of the African leaders? Partly, but most of it is based upon the geopolitical realities of Neo-Colonialism and the resource wars that are heating up between the West, its surrogates like Israel and emerging powers like China. It's no secret that most of the nations targeted for regime change by the Bu$h cabal are Muslim and just coincidently (if you believe in such coincidences) happen to sit over massive reserves of oil or other natural resources coveted by the larcenous Western powers and their client state Israel...
*From The Ramparts*
Junious Ricardo Stanton
*War and Thievery in The Guise of Humanitarianism*

/"It is apparent that one of the principal reasons behind the
unequivocally hostile United States policy towards Sudan is the current
administration's independence from regional U.S. geopolitical objectives
and interests. Sudan's stance of economic independence in particular has
brought the government into direct conflict with U.S. interests. The
independent Muslim journal Crescent International affiliated to the
Toronto-based Institute for Contemporary Islamic Thought (ICIT) noted in
1999 that Sudan "has vast agricultural and mineral resources, is blessed
with two large rivers, the Blue Nile and White Nile, and is Africa's
biggest country." Sudan is also brimming with oil fields and began
exporting oil for the first time on 30 August 1999 in contravention of
U.S. interests. "Sudan is now producing 150,000 barrels per day, and
intends to increase this soon, while domestic consumption varies from
60,000 to 65,000 barrels per day. Sudan is not only self-sufficient in
oil now, but also in a position to earn valuable foreign currency".
Domestic resources in Sudan are liable to be utilized in emerging
policies of independent development." /United States Terrorism in the
Sudan The Bombing of Al-Shifa and its Strategic Role in U.S.-Sudan
Relations y Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed

George W Bu$h recently imposed economic "sanctions" on the government of
Sudan, because of the alleged "genocide" and ongoing conflict in the
Darfur region. "United Nations, June 1 (AP): Sudan's UN ambassador
accused President George W Bush of imposing new economic sanctions
against his country for domestic political reasons and said Americans
should feel "ashamed" because the government is making progress on
peacekeeping, political, and humanitarian issues in Darfur. In an
interview yesterday with The Associated Press, Ambassador Abdalmahmood
Abdalhaleem Mohamad, said US sanctions 'will cripple the humanitarian
situation in Darfur' and elsewhere in the country, because they target
railways, airplanes and other transportation links. But he noted that
when the US first imposed sanctions nearly 10 years ago, 'we make
miracles ... and we emerged as an oil exporting country because of their
sanctions. Now maybe it is a blessing in disguise,' Mohamad said. 'We
will prove to them that we are resilient and we will grow stronger than
what they think. We will transform the challenges into opportunities.'
 http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/003200706011065.htm
Most folks have been hearing about the conflict in Sudan for the past
four years but have not taken the time to peek beneath the headlines of
the corporate mind control apparatus to see what is really going on. If
we were in our right minds as African people, we would be extremely
skeptical if not down right antagonistic towards any and all Europeans'
calls for intervention in any part of Africa, let alone a country like
Sudan that is blessed with abundant natural resources coveted by the
larcenous West. Is there actually conflict in Sudan? Yes. Will
intervention by the West, NATO or a puppet African Union resolve the
core issues in this struggle? Probably not because the last thing the
Europeans wants is real and lasting peace and stability in the region.
Is there conflict in the Horn of Africa? Yes. Does this conflict
threaten to destabilize the whole region? Yes. Is this conflict because
of the megalomania, ineptitude and corruption of the African leaders?
Partly, but most of it is based upon the geopolitical realities of
Neo-Colonialism and the resource wars that are heating up between the
West, its surrogates like Israel and emerging powers like China.
It's no secret that most of the nations targeted for regime change by
the Bu$h cabal are Muslim and just coincidently (if you believe in such
coincidences) happen to sit over massive reserves of oil or other
natural resources coveted by the larcenous Western powers and their
client state Israel. Europeans long ago realized they were a minority of
the world's population and the only way they could dominate the world
was through maximizing the tactic and strategies of "divide conquer and
rule". Everywhere they've set foot on this planet outside of the
Eurasian continent they have employed this strategy. A cursory review of
European contacts with non-Europeans going back several thousand years
will reveal how they developed and modified their divide and rule
program over time. In the modern era they did/do it by fomenting strife
and conflicts between differing ethnic or tribal groups, arming both
sides and sitting back watching them(or prompting and helping them) kill
each other. This is exactly what is happening in Sudan and Darfur.
"From the early 1990s onwards, the U.S. implemented a two-pronged
strategy against Sudan designed to destabilise its government. The
policy enlisted the support of three of Sudan's neighbours - Uganda,
Eritrea and Ethiopia - and involved support for rebels from the Sudan
People's Liberation Army (SPLA) fighting in the south. According to the
National Security News Service (NSNS) reliable reports in the French
media show that: 'The SPLA rebels receive political and indirect
military support from the United States, via American military
assistance to Uganda, Eritrea, and Ethiopia.' The NSNS reports that U.S.
military support of the SPLA has been confirmed by Roger Winter,
Director of the U.S. Committee for Refugees, and was further confirmed
when U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright officially met SPLA
leader John Garang in January 1998 during her trip to Africa. Africa
Confidential, for example, reported that in Uganda the SPLA 'has already
received U.S. help via Uganda", while U.S. special forces are on
"open-ended deployment" with the rebels.[39] As the Boston Globe
elaborated: 'To the peril of regional stability, the Clinton
Administration has used northern Uganda as a military training ground
for southern Sudanese rebels fighting the Muslim government of
Khartoum.' Eritrea and Ethiopia are used similarly to provide military
assistance to the SPLA. The Sunday Times reported that: 'The Clinton
administration has launched a covert campaign to destabilise the
government of Sudan... More than $20m of military equipment, including
radios, uniforms and tents will be shipped to Eritrea, Ethiopia and
Uganda in the next few weeks. Although the equipment is earmarked for
the armed forces of those countries, much of it will be passed on to the
Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA), which is preparing an offensive
against the government in Khartoum.'"
United States Terrorism in the Sudan The Bombing of Al-Shifa and its
Strategic Role in U.S.-Sudan Relations
 http://www.mediamonitors.net/mosaddeq16.html#2
The Sudan People's Liberation Army has been co-opted by the West and is
being used to destabilize the central government in Khartoum. "And so,
while John Garang's Sudan People's Liberation started out as a true
African liberation force, liberation is something the Western world will
not accept for African populations, especially when there is American
oil under their soil. Every single liberation struggle has been co-opted
or curtailed by Western powers. John Garang's Sudan People's Liberation
Movement/Army (SPLM/A), through clandestine deals with powerful Western
institutions, was transformed, fairly early on, from a people's movement
to just another mercenary army serving the imperatives of power and
private profit. The SPLA leader John Garang was a Christian of the
southern minority Dinka tribe with a degree from Grinnell College (Iowa)
and advanced degrees from Iowa State, and with military training from
the U.S. Army's Fort Benning Georgia, the U.S. military academy which
includes the infamous School of the Americas, notable for training Latin
American militaries in torture, massacres and assassinations." Oil in
Darfur? Special Ops in Somalia? The New Old "Humanitarian" Warfare in
Africa by Keith Harmon Snow
 link to www.globalresearch.ca

"There is no mistaking this: the conclusion that can easily be drawn, if
we reduce the Darfur situation to the simplest terms, is that it is
about oil, the Chinese and Arabs have it, and we want it. Who is 'we'?
While some powerful corporate factions connected to the
Anglo-American-Israeli power structure are cooperating with the
Government of Sudan, others are excluded from the profits to be made on
oil and, as we will see, other things. So how do powerful corporations
excluded from a piece of the Sudan pie get at that pie? Divide and
conquer. Covert operations. Psychological operations. Unwittingly obtuse
English professors jumping up and down and screaming, 'atrocities,
atrocities, atrocities.'
Here's the scenario.
First: create instability and chaos that gives the appearance of Arabs
fighting Africans (it's always those other people over there killing
each other). Second: wage a media campaign that focuses a laser beam of
public attention on the rising instability. Third: whip up public
opinion and fury among a highly manipulated Western population who will,
quite literally, believe anything. Fourth: make sure the devil—this time
it's the Janjaweed—comes on horseback. This latter point underscores the
tight, unwavering narrative of good versus evil. Fifth: demonize the
'enemy' [read: dirty A-Rabs] and their partners [Chinese oil companies].
Sixth: onward Christian soldiers and their 'humanitarian' armies; enter
'Save Darfur!' and, voila!, a movement is born. Seventh: continue to
chip away the power of the enemy by chipping away at their credibility.
Eighth: under the banners of high moral approbation, and with full
support of a deeply caring Western public, overthrow the malevolent
forces [of Islam and the Orient] and instill a benevolent, peace-loving,
pro-democracy government. Last: wipe away the sanctions, no longer
needed, and bring much-needed 'development' to another backward country.
And there you have it: yet another civilizing mission to conquer those
barbaric Arab hoardes, and those starving, helpless, uneducated,
diseased, tribal, Africans." ibid
The US is not the only mischief maker in the region. Israel which covets
the water from the mighty Nile River (Sudan hosts both the Blue Nile and
the White Nile) as well as other mineral resources has also been active
in fomenting and supporting discord in the region. "Just as it was
becoming apparent that peace would break out in the south, in 2003
another civil war flared up in the Darfur region in western Sudan.
Starting in February 2003, well-armed rebels of the Sudan Liberation
Army (SLA) and the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), supported by USA
and Israel through the intermediary countries of Eritrea and Chad
respectively, launched a series of attacks on police stations in Darfur
killing many hundreds of police officers. With this police
infrastructure gone, Darfur, a remote region (in an impoverished
country) with many groups competing for farm and grazing land, turned
into a violent lawless zone with many armed groups fighting each other,
e.g., SLA, JEM, the Sudanese military, the Chadean military, local
militias of all ethnicities and aligned with all sides of the conflict,
and bandits. The situation deteriorated through 2004. Thousands of
Darfurians were killed by violence by the various armed groups. Life was
disrupted so agriculture, on which most people in Darfur subsisted,
became difficult or impossible. Hundreds of thousands of people became
refugees. Tens of thousands died from disease and famine." Stop the War
Against Sudan  http://bridgenews.org/documents/roldesudan
Don't go for the okey-doke. Any time whites speak of humanitarian aid or
altruism, double and triple check to see what the real deal is. Always
go beyond the rhetoric and propaganda, seek the real facts. Usually you
will discover most of what the corporate media is saying is a sham,
another lie one more wolf in sheepskin con game out to devour the
unsuspecting uninformed and uninterested so they can continue their
unbridled and ongoing legacy of pillage, rapine and plunder.

-30-