portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts global

9.11 investigation | media criticism

More on BBC Advance Report of Bldg. 7 Collapse

More on BBC Advance Report of Bldg. 7 Collapse. Will we see this in the Oregonian? I think there should be a class action suit against that piece of crap for false advertising. They call themselves a newspaper when they are complicit in a cover-up. Call them, write them, picket them, harrass them.
Read testimony, and see video of police saying "keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down."

 http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/090207broughtdown.htm

(Scroll down to middle of page)




Thanks to Yarrow Mahko for the following:

=d=


======================

The BBC has tacitly acknowledged that the footage is genuine and not a blue-screen scene. They claim it was just an error:

 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html

Note that in his response Richard Porter, Head of News, says:

"We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another."


A) It's highly suspicious and unlikely that they would have lost the footage, as at least two archivists from CNN have noted

B) Actually, the News 24 footage does help clear up the issue, since it also prematurely announced the collapse, but this time with a time stamp:

 http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/270207_bbc_lost_response.html

C) CNN footage commits the same "error:"  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1LetB0z8_o

Think about this also: the feed to the BBC reporter was cut five minutes before the building behind her (WTC 7) collapsed! That means that it is very likely that she witnessed the collapse after reporting that it had already done so! She would have been mighty puzzled, and could not have easily forgotten the incident

The BBC "explanation" is clearly an absurd diversion from the obvious question: who was their source for whatever press release told them the collapse was already a done deal? They have TWO separate channels committing this "error!"

Add this to footage already available in various documentaries and online at YouTube showing emergency personnel talking about how the building was going to "blow up," (  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwjmqkjwnvQ ) and you have a very compelling picture that the building was brought down by controlled demolition (obvious anyway from the speed and symmetry of collapse), and that press releases were prepared but either fired off too early or the demo was delayed for some reason (the shoot down of Flight 93? Was it heading for #7?)

The BBC World footage was found in a huge online News Archive at Internet Archive: www.archive.org. A poster to 911blogger.com provided a list of around 400 links to 1GB MPG files, which many people started downloading. The files were made inaccessible as soon as the story started breaking and lots of people started downloading.

I contacted the Archive by phone and email, and was informed by Paul Hickman, Office Manager, that the files were part of an "experimental" News Archive, and the links weren't meant to be accessible to the public. I asked when the files would be made available again, but in several emails he has refused to give a timeline, and refused to allow me to come to their site and transfer the files to HD for public distribution.

In my last email to him I added at the end that I was Co-producer of Guns and Butter on KPFA, and asked why he could give no timeline nor even allow a copy to be made, given the stated mission of the Archive.

I have yet to receive a reply to that last email.

====
=



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.5/706 - Release Date: 2/28/2007 4:09 PM

Will we see this in the Oregonian? 01.Mar.2007 16:34

Fred Bauer

Hell no it won't be in the Oregonian and we all know why.

Look, if that was the only problem with the official 911 story, I could let it go. But the story is eat up with so many holes there is obviously no substance left. There is absolutely no credibility. To believe in the official account at this point you would have to be severely brain dead.

WTC7 26.Mar.2007 20:26

MikeD

Anyone who researches the facts behind the BBC story involving the collapse of WTC7 will find that the discrepancy was due to daylight versus Eastern Savings Time. If anyone reviews liveleak.com they will find a considerable amount of correspondence (some from me) explaining that the allegation that the BBC report was earlier than the building collapse was simply because of time zones (daylight vs eastern time).