Contact FDA to Stop Sale of Dangerous Cloned Milk & Meat! during public comment period
It is so disturbing to hear about the FDA's Dec. 28, 2006 determination that cloned livestock byproducts are claimed to be "substantially equivalent", a scientifically discredited "analogy" myth already disproven in their previous attempt to use this myth with rBGH, Monsanto's Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone, in the milk supply. Instead of "equivalent", it led to human cancer spikes and human reproductive damage. FDA first unveiled the commercially motivated lie of "substantial equivalance" back in 1993 when it railroaded through approval of recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH). Now we know from a real scientific study (May 2006 Journal of Reproductive Health) that milk induced through genetic engineering is NOT the same...but, because of FDA's irresponsible rubberstamping, U.S. consumers now suffer reproductive problems from...rBGH dairy products with elevated levels of Insulin Like Growth Factor - 1 (IGF-1). False statements by government officials and biotech apologists that cloned animals are "simply genetic twins" is a commercially motivated lie, instead of a public health statement. They ignore numerous studies showing cloned animals suffer higher than normal morbidity & deformity rates. According to leading cloning researcher, MIT Prof. Rudolph Jaensich, "You can not make normal ["equivalent"] clones...." --- Average clone never sees the light of day, since 90% of cloned fetuses die before birth--along with up to 25% of the forced surrogate mothers. To keep damaged genetic clones alive along with forced surrogate hosts that naturally attempt to reject them bodily, "cloning" really is a covert process of using (and selling) higher than usual animal hormone and antibiotic treatments--with damages passed on to YOU. Deadline for public feedback: April 2nd, 2007. Refer to Docket 2006P-0145.
05 Feb 2007
Why Cloned Food Should Be Inedible and Unacceptable
by Family Farm Defenders
Email: familyfarmdefenders (at) yahoo.com (unverified!)
Address: 1019 Williamson St. #B., Madison, WI 53703
On Dec. 28th, 2006 the FDA determined that food from cloned animals was fine for humans to eat. Consumers have until April 2nd, 2007 to provide their feedback. Once again, the U.S. is trying to lead the world over another cliff...
Why Cloned Food Should Be Inedible and Unacceptable
The mission of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is to protect the public's health through assuring the safety of our nation's food supply. The FDA's purpose is NOT to facilitate the dumping of dubious food products onto people's dinner plates for the sake of corporate profit. That is why it is so disturbing to hear about the FDA's Dec. 28, 2006 determination that cloned livestock byproducts are indeed safe for human consumption, and to read a subsequent wave of editorials clamoring for fullblown commercialization of cloned milk and meat.
Many people first learned about animal cloning back in 1997 when a sheep named "Dolly" was splashed across paper headlines and television screens. This sheep was created using a technique known as somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), involving the transfer of genetic material from one animal into the egg of another and the subsequent implantation into the womb of a host. Biotech companies and venture capitalists were quick to tout the potential benefits of livestock cloning for producing pharmaceuticals, human organ transplants, as well as milk and meat. Left unsaid was that the average "Dolly" never sees the light of day, since 90% of cloned fetuses die before birth along with up to 25% of the surrogate mothers. In order to keep these hosts alive, cloning also requires much higher than usual animal treatment with hormones and antibiotics.
There are many valid reasons to be opposed to the sale of such milk and meat that go beyond the ethical debate about cloning itself. First of all, the FDA's decision relies upon the discredited pseudo-science of "substantial equivalence." Dairy farmers and milk drinkers may recall that the FDA first unveiled this shoddy notion back in 1993 when it railroaded through approval of recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH). Of course, now we know from a real scientific study (May 2006 Journal of Reproductive Health) that milk induced through genetic engineering is NOT the same as natural milk. But, because of the FDA's irresponsible rubberstamping, U.S. consumers are now suffering reproductive problems from having ingested rBGH dairy products for years with elevated levels of Insulin Like Growth Factor - 1 (IGF-1).
Statements by government officials and biotech apologists that cloned animals are "simply genetic twins" are also patently misleading. There have been numerous studies showing that once born cloned animals still suffer higher than normal morbidity and deformity rates. According to a leading cloning researcher, MIT Prof. Rudolph Jaensich, "You can not make normal clones. The ones that survive will just be less abnormal than the ones that die early." Basic science - let alone common sense - would suggest that this is symptomatic of other physiological problems and might not make a very healthy meal. Ian Wilmut, one of the scientists who created "Dolly," has publicly warned that even a slight imbalance in a cloned animal's hormone, protein, or fat levels could pose a danger to any would-be consumer. Nonetheless, one of the leading cloning outfits, ViaGen, has already entered into negotiations with Smithfield to put cloned pork into their products.
Worse yet, cloned animals are proposed for the production of industrial enzymes, pharmaceuticals, and other genetically engineered (GE) substances - aka biopharming. Longterm scientific studies have not been done to disprove concerns that biopharming residues will find their way into cloned meat/milk and then into people's mouths. It is bad enough having to worry about Mad Cow being served up with a hamburger, let alone GE spider webs.
Another criticism with the FDA's decision is that it undermines one of the fundamental principles of economic efficiency and marketplace competition, by failing to require labeling. Consumers can not make rational informed choices when they are denied the right to know about their food. By frustrating consumer sovereignty for the sake of corporate secrecy, the FDA is failing to serve the public interest. Given the sordid history behind rBGH, one would suspect that FDA approval of cloned food will give the green light to powerful corporations and their proxies to sue and/or fine smaller producers for daring to use the First Amendment and label their products as "clone-free." So much for the free market idea.
Once again , it seems the FDA is over eager to become an accomplice in the corporate forcefeeding of questionable byproducts to an unwitting populace. Whether it is genetic engineering, biopharming, nanotechnology, irradiation, or cloning, it is hard to escape the thought that U.S farmers and consumers are now guinea pigs caught up in some massive frankenfood experiment that the rest of the world is wise enough to watch from a safe distance.
Contact the FDA to Stop the Sale of Cloned Milk and Meat!
There is now a 90 day public comment period on the FDA's recent decision that cloned milk and meat are "substantially equivalent" to conventional livestock products and hence fit for human consumption. The deadline for public feedback is April 2nd, 2007. Please refer to Docket 2006P-0145 in any comments to the FDA.
FDA Div. Dockets Mgmt. (HFA-305) 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061 Rockville, MD 20857
Toll free 1-888-463-6332
You can also contact your elected officials to demand mandatory consumer labeling and comprehensive safety testing of ALL food that is cloned or genetically engineered.
Congressional Switchboard: 1-202-224-3121
For more information:
Family Farm Defenders, 1019 Williamson St. #B, Madison, WI 53703
Center for Food Safety, 600 Pennsylvania Ave #302 , Washington DC, 20003
# 202-547-9359 www.centerforfoodsafety.org
Food and Water Watch, 1400 16th Street NW #225, Washington, DC 20036
# 202-797-6550 www.foodandwaterwatch.org
recent related post:
Cloned Meat is NOT a clone: up to 5% expressed differently, clones more deformed,cancerous
Clones cannot be perfect copies, and health difficulties arising from clones get transferred into the food chain: you. Yet another open air experiment on your health, thanks to the corrupt FDA, just like their corrupt open air experiment without notification concerning GMOs.
contribute to this article
add comment to discussion