portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article global

media criticism | government | imperialism & war

The U.S. Government's Next 9/11

Must be lots of John Philips Sousa fans out there.
The actions of the U.S. government indicate that a "pre-emptive strike" is imminent against Iran, whom the Bush administration claims is
preparing to launch a terrorist attack in America. The terrorist attack by al CIAduh will give the U.S. government "justification" to retaliate
against Iran in "self-defense."

Dick Cheney has a "contingency plan", which he had drawn up in 2005, to prepare for punitive bombing of Iran when it stages a terrorist
attack against America.
Cheney's plan calls for a full-scale attack on Iran, using nuclear bunker-buster bombs against the "numerous nuclear weapons development
sites" that are "buried deep" under the desert sands, and conventional weapons against a plethora of other "strategic targets."

"The terrorists (Afghani's & Iraqi's) who attacked America on September 11", said Cheney, "are broken and weakened, but still dangerous,
and they are still determined to terrorize the American people again."

The U.S. government considers it a "justifiable opportunity to retaliate legitimately" against any nation that commits similar 9/11 attacks
against America. This "contingency plan" not only includes Iran, but Syria, Lebanon, and other "rogue terrorist states."

One year later, Donald Rumsfeld initiated this plan, making it the government's highest priority to fight terrorism around the world.
Along with two other similar plans, the Pentagon has created an expanded role for the military. The government will use Special Forces or
Special Operations troops, in continuous operations to fight terrorism in other war zones outside of Afghanistan and Iraq.

One of those "outside war zones" will be America. The U.S. military will have a number of options to retaliate against all "domestic terrorists"
or "illegal enemy combatants" who commit "terrorist acts."

"Homeland security is only one part of a much wider strategy which will bring the fight to the enemy", said Michael Chertoff, "and one special
feature of this plan is that the gloves are off, and we will use offense to defend America from terrorists and terrorism."
terrorstorm 21.Nov.2006 09:11

jail bush

Regarding the subject of pretext for invasion/war and the use of state sponsored false flag terrorism, a superb introduction to the subject is alex jones' film, "terrorstorm" i think this can be seen over the net or ordered from his site. he presents irrefutable evidence of state sponsored events as 9/11, the attack on the u.s.s. liberty by israel under orders from the u.s., the london bombings-- this segment is jaw dropping and virtually seals the case regarding 911 and the london episode. he also starts with the reichstag bombing and i think he touches the oklahoma city bombings as well as the declassified and factual history of "operation northwoods" where the u.s. was planning on staging an attack that looked like it was coming from cuba. that would give us a reason to invade cuba but kennedy wouldn't sign off on it. state sponsored terrorism is the path of least resistance to scare the population into submission so they can do what they want. the house of cards commenter is devoid of virtually any knowledge of history if he doesn't know material as basic and available as the former.

Believe It or Not 21.Nov.2006 17:39


Terrorstorm is available to rent from Netflix. Tell everyone to watch it.

another good resource 22.Nov.2006 14:16


The Great Conspiracy by Barry Zwicker is another great examination of the history of False Flag terrorism. ( http://greatconspiracy.ca/)

He covers the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the "Kuwaiti incubator babies" scam and some others. Really well done and not as sensationalist as Alex Jones.

getting tough with Iran 22.Nov.2006 17:44


US could bomb Iran nuclear sites in 2007: analysts

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

President George W. Bush could choose military action over diplomacy and bomb Iran's nuclear facilities next year, political analysts in Washington agree.
"I think he is going to do it," John Pike, director of Globalsecurity.org, a military issues think tank, told AFP.

"They are going to bomb WMD facilities next summer," he added, referring to nuclear facilities Iran says are for peaceful uses and Washington insists are really intended to make nuclear bombs, or weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

"It would be a limited military action to destroy their WMD capabilities" added the analyst, believing a US military invasion of Iran is not on the table.

US journalist Seymour Hersh also said at the weekend that White House hawks led by Vice President Dick Cheney were intent on attacking Iran with or without the approval of the US Congress, both houses of which switch from Republican to Democratic control in January after the November 7 legislative elections.

The New Yorker weekly published an article by Hersh saying that one month before the elections, Cheney held a meeting on Iran in which he said the military option would never be discarded.

The White House promptly issued a statement saying the article was "riddled with inaccuracies."

Joseph Cirincione, Senior Vice President for National Security and International Policy at the Center for American Progress, a Democrat-friendly think tank, also believes the US government could decide to attack Iran.

"It is not realistic but it does not mean we won't do it," he told AFP in an interview. "It is less likely after the elections but it is still very possible."

"If you look at what the administration is doing, it seems that it is going to inevitably lead us to a military conflict," he said, adding that no alternative solution was being sought, including discussions with Iran on Iraq, which could lead to talks on Iran's nuclear program and role in the region.

"Senior members of the (Bush) administration remain seized with the idea that the regime in Iran must be removed," Cirincione said.

"The nuclear program is one reason, but their deeper agenda is this belief that American military power can be used to fundamentally transform the regimes in the Middle East," he added.

With the resignation of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, hardliners in the government have lost one of their leading advocates, and his replacement, former former Central Intelligence Agency chief Robert Gates, has in the past favored direct talks with Iran, said the expert.

"But they remain within the administration at the highest level, the office of the vice president, the national security council staff, perhaps the president himself," Cirincione added.

He also accused neoconservative circles of promoting the military option against Tehran.

In a Sunday op-ed piece in the Los Angeles Times, Joshua Muarvchik, resident scholar at the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute, called for getting tough with Iran.

"We must bomb Iran," he said. "The path of diplomacy and sanctions has led nowhere ... Our options therefore are narrowed to two: we can prepare to live with a nuclear-armed Iran, or we can use force to prevent it."

Israel has also been pushing Washington to get tough on Iran.

Israeli Deputy Defense Minister Ephraim Sneh did not rule out preventive military action to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, in a recent interview with the English-language Jerusalem Post.

However, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad seems unperturbed. On Monday he said Israel was incapable of launching a military attack on Iran's nuclear sites and called Israeli threats "propaganda."

those domestics are covered already 22.Nov.2006 17:53


"It's the first time anywhere in the United States that one of these big things has flown on an official air combat command mission," well so what mission is served in domestic space? this is by admission not a dry run, not a test, not a shakedown cruise of plane or crew, but a real life save us from bad people mission form the President who speaks to god.


Fox News Trumpets Pentagon Spy Drones Listening In On Americans

News Hounds
Wednesday, November 22, 2006

On yesterday morning's FOX & Friends Steve Doocy, Gretchen Carlson and Brian Kilmeade announced that a Global Hawk Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) had flown across the United States. "It's the first time anywhere in the United States that one of these big things has flown on an official air combat command mission," Steve Doocy noted. Brian Kilmeade followed up: "Well, you know what? I love it. They gotta be listening in, listening to the right people. If they're listening in at my house, they're gonna be bored to tears." Doocy jumped in to say that he "wasn't sure" that the drone could listen in, but "they can certainly see what's going on in your back yard. ... I don't think you have anything to worry about as long as you're not doing anything against the law."

Gretchen Carlson expressed skepticism about those people who are worried about invasion of privacy, saying "You know, I don't completely understand this whole controversy when people get all up in arms over the fact that someone may be watching. I mean, for goodness sake, we don't know who's even listening to our phone calls. I know, I know that's a big deal and all that but - aren't you busy in your life and you're worrying about other things goin' on with your family and stuff like that, not worrying about who might be watching you and listening to you with a drone. I don't know. It doesn't bother me."


Well the airheads on FOX & Friends might not be worried, but the whole idea of some military spy drone silently cruising above my neighborhood on an "air combat mission" scares the dickens out of me.

According to the Wikipedia link cited above, at the very least these drones have a less than stellar safety record, having crashed several times. They are also equipped with an array of electronic gadgets that sounds like alphabet soup, the purpose of which is military surveillance.

First we had the NSA wire-tapping program and now this, a robot ship equipped with sophisticated snooping capabilities gliding overhead taking pictures of people in their hot tubs, at their BBQs, walking their dogs, etc. Since the drone is equipped with the latest in GPS, it's not inconceivable that it could be set up to monitor cell phone calls as well.

Big Brother is alive and well and, if the Bush administration has anything to say about it, coming to your neighborhood really soon ...


what, me worry? I'm not a terrorist! let them come for the terrorists. I'm not a killer. let them come for the killers. I'm not un-american. let them come for the un-americans.

Yeah, what, me worry?

my papers you say, why? hey put the taser down...i got rights....hey, somebody help me, my rights are being (audio gets bad here, sounds like giant spak generator, don't worry folks, its them theyre after, not us....