portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary oregon & cascadia

bikes/transportation | community building

Cars out of the city!

It's a radical idea, and a utopian dream to pedestrians and bikers everywhere who are used to dodging two-ton behemoths barreling past them mere inches from their comparatively fragile, soft, crushable bodies.
Cars out of the city.

It's a radical idea, and a utopian dream to pedestrians and bikers everywhere who are used to dodging two-ton behemoths barreling past them mere inches from their comparatively fragile, soft, crushable bodies.

Seattle claims to be such a progressive city, yet we are all held hostage to the demands of the automobile: isolated, atomized experiences, un-walkable cities, unsafe public spaces (roads) for children, walkers and bikers, disconnected communities, road rage-filled drivers, obesity, climate change, and sprawl are just a few of the ways the car demands we act in response to its existence.

Imagine a city without cars. Imagine all of the streets turned into pedestrian malls or another entire block of housing and shops in the space the roads now occupy, with the sidewalks and pedestrian streets becoming the main arteries of transportation. It would be an improvement in the utilization of urban space from the manner roads are used, in which they are usually empty at night. Cities built before the totalitarian domination of the car are designed in such a manner, and are made to suit human beings instead of the giant vehicles they now use to get from place to place. Places designed for people instead of cars are more enjoyable to walk around in, have higher population density, a more vibrant street life, and shops close enough to stop into everyday and get fresh produce, breads and other items.

There have been attempts in recent years at high-cost, planned communities roughly based on this model, but these experiments benefit only the few who can afford to live in them, and leave the rest of us who live in the cities dreaming of such an inviting environment to live in.

How many people die or are seriously injured every year by cars in Seattle?

As someone who was recently hit by an automobile, I feel like I have the right to demand such radical changes. As I look at my bruises, my scabbed over hand and my scuffed up watch, I feel lucky that I did not end up the way so many of my friends have, in the hospital facing serious injuries and months of recovery. I know 4 people who've been hit and nearly killed by drivers while bicycling, all of whom had to endure months and months of agonizing recovery and rehabilitation, only to be forced back into sharing the roads with the machines that almost killed them to get around. So you see, this is not just some utopian dream, or an idea taken home from a trip to Europe or the old world's Medinas (old/center cities), but an idea borne out of the necessity of survival for those on the receiving end of the car's influence on Seattle. Many people in Seattle are in favoy of gun control, but cars kill many times more people than guns every year, yete we continue to give them free reign over our cities. City planners need to stop planning widened and improved roads, and Seattle needs to plan for a human-centered future and leave the outdated car-centered present behind.

We can start by NOT replacing the Viaduct with any type of car-based infrastructure, because to do so would encourage more use of cars. Build it, and they will come. The easier it is to use cars, the more people will use them. This has been proven over and over again. And the easier it is made for cars to be a main form of transportation, the harder it becomes for any other form of transportation to be viable. It is up to the city to put the infrastructure in place for the forms of transportation that are the most desirable, and I think everyone would agree that cars are not the most desirable when we have any and all wondrous possibilities open to us. Building infrastructure for cars instead of for people is how we got to this point of car mania in the first place, and dreaming of the world we want is the first step to making tomorrow the world we'd like to see. What are we waiting for?

It's time make our city a livable place for those of us who are not cars. The cars will adjust.

If we don't, we will continue to kill and injure each other, destroy our environment, isolate ourselves from each other, have few realistic options outside of becoming obese, road rage-induced stress balls who don't know many of their neighbors and whose kids can't play outside safely, and our cities will continue to be places where we must look both ways constantly lest a two-ton metal beast come barreling into us, shattering our worlds and our bones. Who wants to live with killing machines flying past us inches away if we don't have to? Don't we get to decide what we want our city to look like, and what the future looks like?

I have been mostly biking on the sidewalk since I got hit, too scared to venture into the street for long. I get sick to my stomach when I ride past the place where I was hit. I tense up and feel scared on my bike. It doesn't help that my wrists hurt so bad from the crash that it is hard to hold my handlebars and pull on my brake levers. These feeling made me realize that we are not free in Seattle; we are forced into certain spaces and certain ways of acting and interacting due to the demands cars place on us and our social environment. Until we put the demands of humans above the demands of cars our city will never be the place it could be. As a matter of fact, I may just head to Europe for a while where walking and still having time to live a full life is not such a struggle, and where I am not scared walking down the streets, hustling from one curb to another like a squirrel who scurries out of the way as a human walks by.

I hope, but am not optimistic, that Seattle will convert the streets into spaces for open air cafes and pedestrian boulevards, and add more buildings for housing and small corner markets where the roads used to dominate the space. I can't wait for the day!

www.carfree.org has more on this concept.
yes, where is the car-free city! a paradise! 12.Sep.2006 17:24

particleMan

I agree with you 100%! Two years ago, I was "doored" in Boston while commuting to work on my folding bike. I was flipped forward in front of a car and in the blink of an eye was staring up at the front bumber of a car stopped in traffic. If the light had been green I would not be writing this...

Cars, as you have so perfectly described, are destructive of the atmosphere, human society, and both drivers and innocent bystanders alike. Although 3,000 were murdered on Sep 11th--considered the single most horrific incident in US history, more than 40,000 are killed in car accidents EVERY SINGLE YEAR! This doesn't count the HUNDREDS of thousands injured, maimed and crippled for life. The situation is horrible.

Exactly as you have said, the cars need to be pushed OUT OF OUR DAILY LIVES. Let them drive BETWEEN CITIES or AROUND CITIES, but not THROUGH CITIES. Communities should be build for people, not exploding death-mobiles.

Please, someone, show me ONE CITY in the U.S. that has the intelligence and guts to ban automobiles, and all the people like us will move there! It will be a paradise!

Let's do it now, and we will enjoy for the rest of our wonderful lives!

If we can't convince a single town, then we should start with a single community. Like a non-smoking restaurant, it will be a non-driving neighborhood. It will be so delightful, safe, quiet, and clean, than others will be jealous at once.

START PUSHING for change! These are our lives, our communities, our planet!

Pipe Dream 12.Sep.2006 19:09

Ben Douglass

As long as our US economy is built around the "vehicle" this paradise will never come true...unfortunately.

If it does it will never be in our lifetimes or our children's.

think 12.Sep.2006 20:03

you forgot something

you say seattle claims to be a progressive city
did you forget to state that hundreds of thousands of people live there?
by what venue would you supply the city with goods?
how many consumable goods are used on an average day?
will they be hand-carried in?

here's your answer 12.Sep.2006 21:07

thinking clearly, thanks

Current technology and available machinery allows the vast majority of goods to be manufactured on a small/micro scale within each neighborhood, from raw materials that can be grown and harveted annually and then grown again the next year on the same ground, also within or close to the neighborhood.

---------------------------------
think 12.Sep.2006 20:03
you forgot something link

you say seattle claims to be a progressive city
did you forget to state that hundreds of thousands of people live there?
by what venue would you supply the city with goods?
how many consumable goods are used on an average day?
will they be hand-carried in?

sss 12.Sep.2006 21:49

fd

there are many cities in europe, the middle east, etc... where millions of people live yet they have entire cities with no cars. cars and trucks with goods park on the edge of the car-free zone and people unload goods to be brought into the shops in the city center. they use dollies, handtrucks, carts, donkeys, or just people power to move the stuff in. a city without cars would also necessitate a reduction in the over-consumptive american lifestyle back to more sustainable levels. another reason why it'd be good to have car-free cities. people in the rest of the world buy way less Stuff than us, and our cities where giant trucks can roll in and fill up the shelves with useless shit is part of the reason why.

please 12.Sep.2006 23:16

identify

a city with a million people that is car free

Not sustainable 13.Sep.2006 05:16

need a local economy

A city with a million people is not sustainable, as it leaves no room for individuals and businesses to develop a sympathetic, coevolutionary relationship with the limited natural resources of the local landscape. It has also been made possible artificially by the advent of the automobile, allowing goods to be transported large distances to city residents. While, of course, cities with 20 million residents now exist, it is now going to be necessary to restore the landscapes that were taken over by the built environment between viable centers of human residency and commerce in those citties so that those landscapes may again be put into agricultural use for food and raw materials. Of course, this means drawing down of populations through generational attrition in these megacities as well, since neither the local nor the world's resources will be able to support them at those large numbers, and global trade will become increasingly infeasible as the mainstay of economic activity locally or worldwide.

for real 13.Sep.2006 10:21

stizzy

You have no idea the amount of consumerist crap that is by necessity brought into portland daily. Exiling cargo vehicles from the city would be a huge blow to the retail economy in this town. First off, there would be so much opposition from large and small businesses that you'd never get a large enough majority to ok it. Second, even if it did get ok'd, the only businesses that would be in a position to absorb the phenominal cost of people powering the thousands upon thousands of tons of cargo from the outskirts of the city into the city proper would be the large corporations who have deep pockets. Small businesses would go bankrupt trying to pay people to bring in their daily shipments. It's just not workable. And the businesses that could handle the extra cost would simply pass it on to consumers by jacking up prices. Working class families who can barely afford to feed their kids would end up even more fucked than before, especially now that mommy and daddy have to bike 20 miles to work and back every day and thus have no time to buy groceries, cook meals, or watch their kids. And with the exorbitant markup of every consumer item draining their already stretched budgets, there would be no money left over for child care, meaning yet another generation of poorly-raised children consequently ill-prepared for healthy emotional life in the real world.

No option 13.Sep.2006 11:28

friend

Well, first there needs to be an understanding of what is a sustainable, healthy economy for all. Shipping crap to and fro long distances is not sustainable and it drains money away from people in their communities, widens the gap between the rich and poor, and ultimately drains the environment of the resources needed to sustain any economy or human life.

Once this becomes understood, then the alternatives become understood, and people shift towards this.

It doesn't matter what people think they want. It's either we make this shift or our economy tanks and traffic comes to a halt regardless.

Carfree Portland, Reply to Stizzy 13.Sep.2006 12:34

ne1

The bleak scenario you paint is highly unrealistic. It sounds more like what would happen in the event of a natural or man-made disaster (oil depletion?) suddenly interrupting all transport. It does NOT sound like what would happen in an orderly, planned transition to an auto-free city. Honestly, it surprises me that you would write something so bleakly conservative and absurdly tunnel-visioned.

If you are genuinely interested in this subject, you can read scads of highly thoughtful and ingenious designs for transitioning to the auto-free city. These designs are not pure bluesky fantasies, but instead inspired by real world examples of auto-free cities, like Venice, or transitioning ones, like Bogota Colombia. A great resource for this is the car free cities website and excellent accompanying book by J Crawford (see  http://www.carfree.com/).

Self-Indulgent Wasteful Lifestyle Hard to Change 13.Sep.2006 17:00

Nala

Sadly, I think it would take a natural disaster or a severe shortage of the resources that support auto use to banish internal combustion vehicles from city centers (other than purely ornamental "old city" show districts).

There's the delivery problem and there's the selfish American attitude that reflects a desire NEVER to be inconvenienced and to be able to buy anything it pleases IMMEDIATELY. In America, as in the rest of the world, there used to be something called "seasonal fruits and vegetables." That meant - for example - that at a certain time of the year you could enjoy strawberries but when the season was over, the strawberries were gone unless you chose to freeze them. Now we bring them in from all over the world so that no one has to be disappointed if they simply must have strawberries in the dead of winter.

Some of the best things about European cities are the once-a-week markets in the various squares - meat markets, fruit and vegetable markets, clothing markets, book markets - causing people not only to pace themselves, but to anticipate, schedule, plan and combine trips with friends. In cities that have small stores that carry a variety of items on a daily basis, shoppers bring their own bags. No carts, or only very small carts in limited quantity, are provided. Returning to this country and seeing for the first time in months the huge shopping carts in our Supermarkets was appalling to me. Almost as overwhelming as seeing the overabundance of different brands of items on the neverending shelves. No wonder newly arrived foreign visitors stand stock still in the middle of the aisles, frozen like deer in the headlights.

Let me tell you, a lot of this stuff goes to waste. It turns up in the trash bins behind the stores . . . in the soup kitchens and aid boxes downtown and at churches (if the stores are willing or able to pass it along). In one low-income food co-op I volunteered at we received boxes of baguettes and other designer breads which are marketed in brown paper bags. We were not allowed to distribute this bread because of its wrapping and threw dumpsters-full away every day.

But back to cars. I haven't owned one for three years and don't miss it at all. There is no uglier sight than our streets choked with single-driver passenger cars making numerous wasteful trips or parked chock-a-block along the curbs - so numerous that the sidewalk cannot even be seen from across the street. Our world is infested with cars and the volume and the activity level is getting heavier every day. Clouds of noxious fumes fill the air. Drivers preoccupied with their cell phones, navigational devices and other gadgets have bagged a record number of pedestrians, bicyclists and other motorists this year alone.

At least one writer has published books based upon a scenario in which all internal combustion engines suddenly cease working due to an unexplained phenomenon. That would probably be the only way that greedy humans would give up their "god given" right to drive whenever and wherever they want and consider practical alternatives. But given the nature of progress, someone in Detroit would no doubt rustle up a nuclear-powered car rather than something kinder and gentler.

uh 13.Sep.2006 18:37

uh

"Second, even if it did get ok'd, the only businesses that would be in a position to absorb the phenominal cost of people powering the thousands upon thousands of tons of cargo from the outskirts of the city into the city proper would be the large corporations who have deep pockets. Small businesses would go bankrupt trying to pay people to bring in their daily shipments."

actually, in the cities i have been in with large car-free areas where everything is brought in by human powered transport, it is all small businesses, little shops. huge corporations can only make inticing amounts of profit if they sell tons of stuff at cheaper prices, which they wouldn't be able to do in a car-free area where there can't be huge supermarkets or bigbox retailers because there's just not enough space. in the car-free cities i've been in, only little shops who can economically(i.e.-the shop owners themselves) bring in the day's goods for sale can exist. the bigger superemarkets, if they exist, were on the outskirts of the city where trucks can pull up and unload.

in Brazil 13.Sep.2006 19:27

juliana

In Brazil the downtown areas of most cities are blocked off from cars. This is great for residents, those who work downtown and tourism! Infact, is brings lots of money into the coty, because it's so much easier to have live music on Friday afternoon when people are getting off of work, weekend music events, etc. Taxis are big business in large Brazillian cities, there is endless public transportation often until four or five A.M. which could cut down on drunk driving in a country like ours. It also makes walking after dinner delightful, as the streets are smog and tire free, and you don't have to stop at every block waiting for the light to change, and praying that you won't get hit.

Urban Growth Boundaries 13.Sep.2006 19:40

justme2cents

Force people into the cities. The idea of living in smaller groups vs. the huge cities would solve alot of this dilema or at least make it more manageable, BUT the amount of available land - urban growth boundaries - artifically limits the amount of land available and hence the regions people live in.

Please could we start with just one day! 14.Sep.2006 09:45

cars scare me

I'd love it if we could just get the city to try a car free day once month, then move to one every Sunday. It would get folks to start seeing another option and that it a car free city could work. In Japan they have a street that is closed to cars every Sunday and it was a huge success and brought lots of creative ways to use the street...as seen in the book "fruits". Since we can get the business to close the street for a parade, why not go a little further. We may be able to get the city to think about this, and get the rest of the businesses on board when they see how great it would be for them. Many more people may chose to come downtown and walk with their children insead of the mall! Could actually bring in more sales for the businesses...and I could ride my bike fear free, what a concept!!;)

There are viable solutions 14.Sep.2006 14:02

Exile portlander_in_exile@yahoo.com

But only a small portion of the population would be willing to make the change. A combination of human power, electric rail, bicycle, and water transportation would cover the needs of most people. But what about the morbidly obese? the elderly, or the disabled. I realize that the obesity would take care of itself after a while, but people would suffer greatly. Moving food, products, and materials would require a new type of rail system, one that is not currently available in north america.

I'm all for removing the automobile, but I feel like I'm the only one.

take responsibility 14.Sep.2006 20:41

a self righteous asshole to a petro addict

I bike 25 a day to and from work. It only takes a little longer than sitting in your traffic jam and it feels great to do it too. Of course I have been doing so since the 80's when I started out riding 18 a day in Silicon valley. At that time I was a single parent of a young daughter who was not left lacking from how I got to work in any way. All the excuses to keep up the filthy car habit seem lame to me. Most people are afraid of the pathetic imaginary criticism they may face if seen cycling on a weekday or are just plain lazy. I see way too many obese people barely able to fit in a car and increasing numbers of trophy damsels in their rolling phone booth SUV's which is in a word sickening. I watch my grandsons world being poured down the shitter by this ignorance and all thats left to do is hope one person might feel the truth in this and take a chance at happiness. . .thanx.

cant we start with a couple of car free streets? 25.Sep.2006 12:16

get out of your car, and LIVE!!!!!

hey,
perhaps we could start with a street or 2..
I would suggest the street through downtown portland that the max tracks share..
I would like to see all of portland downtown car free, and we have to start somewhere.
they seem to close off waterfront street for any type of event easily enough, howabout that one too?
I belive that if we had a couple of bicycle and alternate transportation routes, this would actually help the other streets to carry the gas-holes more efficiantly too.
Didnt our current Mayor Tom Potter claim he was bike friendly, when trying to get votes?
I think that means more than riding with critical mass 1 time! (although it was pretty cool)
keep it up people, we CAN make a difference!!!!
live to ride, and ride to LIVE!!!!