portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts united states

9.11 investigation

The Flying Elephant: Evidence for Involvement of a Third (& Fourth) Jet in the WTC Attacks

"Scholars for 9/11 Truth has been appalled to learn that the author of this study has received threats against himself and his family for having written this article [and made watching four videos of the third plane, totalling around 2:10 min, conveniently available in a single article's links. I have seen many still photos of this third plane, though these are the first videos I have seen documenting it.]"

"The source of these threats has suggested that he drop out of our organization and that this study should "go away". He has withdrawn from S9/11T, but this piece of research cannot "go away". It has already been widely read and no doubt copied. Under the circumstances, it would be a huge mistake to allow this organization and its journal to be manipulated by external threats. Since the author has nothing to do with our decision to keep it in place, responsibility shifts to the organization. We hope others will pursue its leads."

OK. I will. I hope it is clear that certainly official Bush administration in origin threats on 9/11 Scholars lives are signs of those people noticing something really important. When the stoic strategies of indifference and ignoring are tossed out the window toward active threats, particularly threats on little kids, you can bet that this is really important.

I have one main thing to add to this article. I made an observation in one of these linked videos, and added some bracketed [comments] that it shows MORE THAN A THIRD PLANE, it shows actually a THIRD AND THEN SECONDS LATER A FOURTH PLANE (which the videographer tracks on both occassions, how did that guy miss this in wroting this?) going by in the distance as the WTC2 is struck at 9:02 a.m., in the video marked with a ***. I don't see how the original author missed that in that video.
"Hi there! I'm the third plane at the WTC! Who am I? See my friend the fourth?"
The Flying Elephant: Evidence for Involvement of a Third Jet in the WTC Attacks
Scholars for 9/11 Truth*
 http://www.journalof911studies.com/

No mention of a large, commercial-class aircraft loitering in the restricted airspace of lower Manhattan during the strikes on the WTC towers will be found in the 9/11 Commission Report.

It does not appear in any version of the Official Story.

It is largely unknown even in critical studies of 9/11.

Yet substantial evidence exists to support its presence coincident with the
attacks, actually orbiting in close proximity to the towers for several minutes while the North Tower burned and [before and during when] the South Tower was struck. [It even appears after the South Tower was struck.]

Photography, video footage and eyewitness accounts, including FDNY transcripts and mainstream media audio, confirm this fact. Why is this significant?

Let us consider the commercial air traffic on a typical Tuesday morning
over New York City. There are three major airports servicing the city: La Guardia and JFK International to the east, and Newark International across the Hudson to the west. Normal holding patterns for these airports do not intersect the borough of Manhattan at any point.

Lower Manhattan is, and was on the morning of 9/11/01, a low-altitude flight-restricted (no fly) zone for commercial jets, as designated by the FAA, for the obvious reason that heavy, fast-moving aircraft and tall buildings pose mutual hazards.

Air traffic near the WTC towers was doubly restricted, with a minimum ceiling extending two thousand feet above the towers (3,300 feet) within a radius of one nautical mile, excepting only police aviation without special permit. These were the VFR (visual flight rules) parameters in effect on the morning of 9/11. Once WTC1 was hit, the black smoke plume expanding southeast from the tower would pose an additional threat to navigation.

No avoidance warning from Air Traffic Control would be necessary, as no rational commercial pilot (no matter how curious) would risk his aircraft, crew or passengers in a "fly-by" of the burning North Tower. But in this anonymous Camera Planet segment we see a large, twin-jet aircraft (757/767-class) doing just that at approximately 8:58am (assuming the time signature is uncorrected by one hour), five minutes before WTC2 will be struck. Even disregarding the indicated time, as WTC1 is burning and WTC2 is not, the segment is clearly recorded between 8:46am and 9:03am.

Note this white aircraft with dark engines and vertical stabilizer is not the aircraft that will impact WTC2.

 http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc2hit13/911.wtc.yet.another.plane.wmv

This still from the video isolates the aircraft:

[]

According to the 9/11 Commission, two F-15s were scrambled from Otis Air Force Base at 8:46am (some 33 minutes after flight controllers lost contact with AA11), and were inbound to NYC at high speed, presumably to intercept suspicious airliners. Presumably commercial flights in NY airspace would be alerted to this danger. Yet this aircraft cruises slowly near the stricken
North Tower, seemingly unconcerned its behavior makes it a logical target for these fighters. Of course, the absurdly late scramble and non-arrival of the F-15s is a serious problem for the official narrative, which remains obscured by contradictory accounts from the FAA, NORAD, NEADS, the news media and the pilots themselves. (The Commission has these fighters finally arriving for Combat Air Patrol over NYC at 9:25am, after being vectored into a holding pattern off Long Island.)

At least one photograph captures this aircraft (or one with a similar profile) in the interval between the tower strikes, flying another pass almost directly above WTC2 at an altitude of approximately 2,000 feet, judging by its size and position relative to the smoke plume, to which
it appears recklessly close:

[]

At 9:03am, "UA175" approaches from the south at an improbably high speed and impacts the South Tower. CNN aired this [supposed] "amateur video" of the event, which captures (without notice by Aaron Brown or Paula Zahn) what is evidently the same jet seen in the Camera Planet segment, making a similar northwest pass (but farther west, approximately over Battery Park) as the South Tower hit occurs.

 http://www.areadownload.com/video/wtc/WTC%20-%20Amateur%20Video%2004.mpg

***[Actually the article fails to note that TWO SEPARATE additional planes are flying by, one plane in the film between Aaron Brown's words "and now....no words, no reasons"; the fourth plane seconds later making another pass in the same direction, overlapping with Paula Zahn's words "just the impact of what was witnessed here in New York", with the plane appearing above the "EWS" letters (first over the "S", then as the camera follows it and attempts to center it, over the "E" then the "W"--in the "BREAKING NEWS" banner. You will note that the videographer is following this fourth plane and is unable to decide which is more newsworthy the seconds of the WTC2 hit or the third/fourth plane that he keeps panning over to catch! Note once more that this is the "famous video clip" that in the future is always shown with the third/fourth plane entirely removed, by simply ending the clip artifically immediately after the explosion. This thus is intellectually dishonest because the videographer was attempting, by his/her camera pans, to capture two phenomena at once: both the WTC2 hit by something, as well as his pained quick pans to the aras of following the third plane (during the Aaron Brown voiceover) and then a quick lunge to follow the fourth plane (during the voiceover of Paula Zahn).

This still from the video isolates the aircraft as "UA175" rips through the South Tower:

[]

At 9:04am, Diane Sawyer of ABC News made remarks on-air about the "circling" jet she and her colleagues "all saw" prior to the second strike. She admits she "just assumed" it was the same one that struck the South Tower.

[It additionally shows that some third/fourth plane was moving back and fourth in the vicinity of the WTCs illegally in this permanently off limits area after both WTC1 and WTC2 were hit. Moreover, Diane Saywer indicates that she witnessed a third plane doing the same long before WTC2 was hit. From Diane Sawyer's voiceover, she indicates that she and her coanchor host both saw a third plane doing a back and forth pass in the 15 minute interium between the WTC1 and WTC2 hits (8:46/7 to 9:02/3 a.m.). That pre WTC2 hit back and forth pass however is without video, only their witness statements, though they do show video of a post WTC2 hit (9:02/3 a.m) where another close by third plane is still there, passing back and forth. It is interesting to note that the video is one of an additional third plane still in the area, going back and forth AFTER both the WTC1 and WTC2 hits (approx. a few minutes after WTC2 hit)]:

 http://www.terrorize.dk/911/comments/911.wtc.plane.circling.around.wmv

Of interest with respect to this "mystery jet" is the phenomenon, acknowledged but unexplained by the Commission, of the "phantom Flight 11". [or "not so phantom Flight 11"]

At 9:21am, after both towers had been hit, and long after "AA11" had struck the North Tower, Boston flight control, relaying information from FAA headquarters, informed NEADS that "AA11" was still in the air and heading south, [over New Jersey] perhaps to Washington, DC. Were they tracking this "third aircraft"?

 http://www.terrorize.dk/911/flight11/911.wtc.the.real.flight.11.ng.wmv

Notable in this context are reports by FDNY personnel that they received a warning about a third aircraft.

Deputy Chief Peter Hayden, in an interview with Firehouse Magazine in April 2002, explained "We had a report from OEM that there was possibility of a third plane coming in." Even more intriguing, in the Naudets' documentary 9/11,a firefighter is filmed explaining what caused the collapse of the South Tower: "The FBI thinks it was a third plane."

Much research has focused on the details and effects of various military exercises apparently underway on 9/11, especially "live-fly" NORAD drills designed to mimic multiple terrorist aircraft attacks on high-profile US targets. One NORAD drill, "Vigilant Guardian", is admitted by the Commission to have been in progress but is dismissed in a footnote as being unrelated to
the hijacking scenario and as posing no impediment to defensive response, despite the well documented confusion among NORAD personnel as to whether the attacks were "real world or exercise", the presence of artificial radar "injects" on their screens, and the recognition of as many as eleven simultaneous potential hijackings.

Was the "third jet" an actor in such an exercise?

Was it meant to confuse defensive response?

Was it monitoring (or controlling) the attacks?

Was it a back-up in the event of a miss on the towers?

Was it one of these?  http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=90

If it is a civil aircraft, records of its take-off and landing must exist. A FOIA request to the FAA should be filed.

If it is military, it is automatically suspect. Any proper investigation of 9/11 must account for this aircraft.

Grateful acknowledgment is made to Brian P. Duncan and Robert E. Moore, Esq. for their research in support of this study.

* Scholars for 9/11 Truth has been appalled to learn that the author of this study has received threats against himself and his family for having written this article. The source of these threats has suggested that he drop out of our organization and that this study should "go away". He has withdrawn from S9/11T, but this piece of research cannot "go away". It has already been widely read and no doubt copied. Under the circumstances, it would be a huge mistake to allow this organization and its journal to be manipulated by external threats. Since the author has nothing to do with our decision to keep it in place, responsibility shifts to the organization. We hope
others will pursue its leads.

The article's several other pictures of the third plane is available here:
 http://www.journalof911studies.com/




The Journal of 9/11 Studies is a peer-reviewed, open-access, electronic-only journal covering the whole of research related to 9/11/2001. All content is freely available online.



Journal of 9/11 Studies Volume 1 - June 2006


Title Page

WTC 7: A Short Computation
Kenneth L. Kuttler 1

9/11 - Evidence for Controlled Demolition: a Short List of Observations
Frank Legge 4

9/11 - Evidence Suggests Complicity: Inferences from Actions
Frank Legge 16

The Flying Elephant: Evidence for Involvement of a Third Jet in the WTC Attacks
Scholars for 9/11 Truth 26

Momentum Transfer Analysis of the Collapse of the Upper Storeys of WTC1
Gordon Ross 30



An Invitation to Submit

The Editors invite article submissions from all researchers working at the forefront of investigations related to 9/11/2001 and its aftermath.
Editors:

Prof. Steven E. Jones
Department of Physics and Astronomy
N-269 Eyring Science Center
Brigham Young University
Provo, Utah, USA 84602
 Steven_Jones@byu.edu

Prof. Judy D. Wood
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Clemson University
Clemson, So. Carolina, USA 29634
 woodj@clemson.edu


ADVISORY EDITORIAL BOARD

Alex Floum, Marcus Ford, Derrick Grimmer, Richard McGinn, Kimberly Moore, Robert Moore, Diana Ralph, Kevin Ryan, Robert Stevens, Lon Waters and Paul Zarembka.

Manuscripts to be considered for publication should be sent to one of the Editors. All papers will be subjected to peer-review prior to online publication.

Preferably, manuscripts should be submitted electronically. Referee reports and correspondence should also be sent by e-mail if possible.

one correction, did show video of a before WTC2 hit 3rd plane & after WTC2 hit 13.Jul.2006 02:13

of the 3rd plane at ABC

correct quote

[It additionally shows that some third/fourth plane was moving back and fourth in the vicinity of the WTCs illegally in this permanently off limits area after both WTC1 and WTC2 were hit. Moreover, Diane Saywer indicates that she witnessed a third plane doing the same long before WTC2 was hit. From Diane Sawyer's voiceover, she indicates that she and her coanchor host both saw a third plane doing a back and forth pass in the 15 minute interium between the WTC1 and WTC2 hits (8:46/7 to 9:02/3 a.m.). That pre WTC2 hit back and forth pass IS WITH video AS WELL AS their witness statements FROM A DIFFERENT ANGLE, WHICH IS THEN FOLLOWED BY A video of a post WTC2 hit (9:02/3 a.m) FROM A DIFFERENT ANGLE where another close by third plane is still there, passing back and forth. It is interesting to note that the video is one of an additional third plane still in the area, going back and forth AFTER both the WTC1 and WTC2 hits (approx. a few minutes after WTC2 hit)]:

 http://www.terrorize.dk/911/comments/911.wtc.plane.circling.around.wmv

unlikely C32 on paint issue alone, though an interesting Boeing 757... 13.Jul.2006 02:58

change body color a bit and it's the third plane

Change the body color a bit and it's more than the third plane, it's Cheney's Air Force Two keeping watch for him!


C-32

- IT CAN CERTAINLY BE REMOTE CONTROLLED: Other items include the future air navigation system with Global Positioning System and Flight Management System/Electronic Flight Instrument System. [though of course as a Boeing 757, it can be remote commandeered anyway.]

- The C-32 is a military version of the Boeing 757-200 extended range aircraft,

- It's at Andrews Airforce base. It's a model for the VP and Presidential planes, a militarized Boeing 767. Active-duty aircrews from the 1st Airlift Squadron, 89th Airlift Wing at Andrews Air Force Base, Md., fly the aircraft, ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE STOOD DOWN ON 9-11, despite a Secret Service order to get planes in the air to protect DC from (obviously) clueless "patriot loyal" Secret Service (instead of "Bush loyal" stand downers) around Bush. So we already have a coterie of traitors at Andrews Airforce Base, yielding a bit of plausibility that it is Cheney's Air Force Two "eye in the WTC sky" we see.

- Heading the safety equipment list is the Traffic Collision Avoidance System and Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System that gives advance warning of possible air and ground threats.


C-32

Mission
The C-32 provides safe, comfortable and reliable transportation for our nation's leaders to locations around the world. The primary customers are the vice president, using the distinctive call sign "Air Force Two," the first lady, and members of the Cabinet and Congress.

Features
The C-32 is a specially configured version of the Boeing 757-200 commercial intercontinental airliner. The C-32 body is identical to that of the Boeing 757-200, but has different interior furnishings and 21st century avionics. The passenger cabin is divided into four sections:

-- The forward area has a communications center, galley, lavatory and 10 business class seats.
-- The second section is a fully enclosed stateroom for the use of the primary passenger. It includes a changing area, private lavatory, separate entertainment system, two first-class swivel seats and a convertible divan that seats three and folds out to a bed.
-- The third section contains the conference and staff facility with eight business class seats.
-- The rear section of the cabin contains general seating with 32 business-class seats, galley, two lavatories and closets.

Because the C-32 is a high-standing aircraft, it is easier to see under and around it -- an important security factor for protecting the plane and its passengers.

The C-32 is more fuel efficient and has improved capabilities over its C-137 predecessor. It can travel twice the distance on the same amount of fuel, and operate on shorter runways down to 5,000 feet (1,524 meters) in length. Its 92,000-pound (41,731 kilogram) fuel capacity allows the aircraft to travel 5,500 nautical miles unrefueled.

Heading the safety equipment list is the Traffic Collision Avoidance System and Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System that gives advance warning of possible air and ground threats. Weather systems are enhanced with a Predictive Windshear Warning System. Other items include the future air navigation system with Global Positioning System and Flight Management System/Electronic Flight Instrument System.

Inside the C-32, communications are paramount. The vice president, heads of state and other decision-makers can conduct business anywhere around the world using improved telephones, satellites, television monitors, facsimiles and copy machines. The C-32 has state-of-the-art avionics equipment.

Background
The C-32 is a military version of the Boeing 757-200 extended range aircraft, selected along with the C-37A to replace the aging fleet of C-137 aircraft. Active-duty aircrews from the 1st Airlift Squadron, 89th Airlift Wing at Andrews Air Force Base, Md., fly the aircraft.

The contract was awarded for the C-32 in August 1996. By using commercial off-the-shelf acquisition practices, a new record has been set from contract award to aircraft delivery -- less than two years. The C-32 is the first military aircraft ever to be acquired in this manner. The 89th Airlift Wing acquired the first of four aircraft in late June 1998.

General Characteristics
Primary Function: High-priority personnel transport
Builder: Boeing Company
Power Plant: Two Pratt and Whitney 2040 engines
Thrust: 41,700 pounds static thrust each engine
Length: 155 feet, 3 inches (47.32 meters)
Height: 44 feet, 6 inches (11.02 meters)
Wingspan: 124 feet, 8 inches (37.99 meters)
Maximum Takeoff Weight: 255,000 pounds (115,668 kilograms)
Range: 5,500 nautical miles unrefueled range
Ceiling: 42,000 feet (12,727 meters)
Speed: 530 miles per hour (Mach 0.8)
Load: 45 passengers
Unit Cost: Unavailable
Crew: 16 (varies with mission)
Date Deployed: June 19, 1998
Inventory: Active force, 4; ANG: 0; Reserve: 0

Point of Contact
89th Airlift Wing, Public Affairs Office; 1535 Command Dr, Ste A209A;
Andrews AFB MD 20762-7002; DSN 858-4511 or (301) 981-4511.

January 2006

 http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=90

If the third plane is from Andrews AFB, it would probabaly be a high level Bush/Cheney "remote viewing platform" with their minions in direct contact with Bush in Florida and Cheney in the secondary bunker under the White House, since they certainly would be unable to trust the whole "patriot loyal" Air Force regular staff with such treasonous questions about "well, did it hit yet?"

Perhaps, if it is a slightly repainted C32, it definitely would link up our treasonous excutive branch of Bush and Cheney directly with their "eye in the sky" at the WTCs that they could send up with some of their minions to watch the New York Action and report back on highly scrambled communication lines directly to the White House Cheney bunker that no one else would be privy to at all.

If Bush had Air Force One with him in Florida, then the Air Force Two at Andrews AFB would indeed be available. Where was Air Force Two on 9-11-01?

It fits even more hideously well since that would be Cheney's plane. Perhaps Cheney sent it there to watch and report on his treasonous deeds because he could trust no one with what he was doing through the regular communication lines.
the third plane: total white body, blue/dark wings and blue/dark tail
the third plane: total white body, blue/dark wings and blue/dark tail
CHENEY'S C32: non total white body, blue/dark wings, blue/dark tail
CHENEY'S C32: non total white body, blue/dark wings, blue/dark tail
United decoy: non total white body, non blue/dark wings, blue/dark tail
United decoy: non total white body, non blue/dark wings, blue/dark tail

photo time 13.Jul.2006 15:26

K. Odak

I love photos too. Meditate on this one. 9/11/01

Is It Cheney's Air Force Two "eye in the sky" reporting to his bunker? 13.Jul.2006 16:20

more

Change the body color a bit and it's more than the third plane, it's Cheney's Air Force Two keeping watch for him!

unlikely C32 on paint alone, though an interesting Boeing 757...

C-32

- IT CAN CERTAINLY BE REMOTE CONTROLLED: Other items include the future air navigation system with Global Positioning System and Flight Management System/Electronic Flight Instrument System. [though of course as a Boeing 757, it can be remote commandeered anyway.]

- The C-32 is a military version of the Boeing 757-200 extended range aircraft,

- It's at Andrews Airforce base. It's a model for the VP and Presidential planes, a militarized Boeing 767. Active-duty aircrews from the 1st Airlift Squadron, 89th Airlift Wing at Andrews Air Force Base, Md., fly the aircraft, ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE STOOD DOWN ON 9-11, despite a Secret Service order to get planes in the air to protect DC from (obviously) clueless "patriot loyal" Secret Service (instead of "Bush loyal" stand downers) around Bush. So we already have a coterie of traitors at Andrews Airforce Base, yielding a bit of plausibility that it is Cheney's Air Force Two "eye in the WTC sky" we see.

- Heading the safety equipment list is the Traffic Collision Avoidance System and Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System that gives advance warning of possible air and ground threats.


C-32

Mission
The C-32 provides safe, comfortable and reliable transportation for our nation's leaders to locations around the world. The primary customers are the vice president, using the distinctive call sign "Air Force Two," the first lady, and members of the Cabinet and Congress.

Features
The C-32 is a specially configured version of the Boeing 757-200 commercial intercontinental airliner. The C-32 body is identical to that of the Boeing 757-200, but has different interior furnishings and 21st century avionics. The passenger cabin is divided into four sections:

-- The forward area has a communications center, galley, lavatory and 10 business class seats.
-- The second section is a fully enclosed stateroom for the use of the primary passenger. It includes a changing area, private lavatory, separate entertainment system, two first-class swivel seats and a convertible divan that seats three and folds out to a bed.
-- The third section contains the conference and staff facility with eight business class seats.
-- The rear section of the cabin contains general seating with 32 business-class seats, galley, two lavatories and closets.

Because the C-32 is a high-standing aircraft, it is easier to see under and around it -- an important security factor for protecting the plane and its passengers.

The C-32 is more fuel efficient and has improved capabilities over its C-137 predecessor. It can travel twice the distance on the same amount of fuel, and operate on shorter runways down to 5,000 feet (1,524 meters) in length. Its 92,000-pound (41,731 kilogram) fuel capacity allows the aircraft to travel 5,500 nautical miles unrefueled.

Heading the safety equipment list is the Traffic Collision Avoidance System and Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System that gives advance warning of possible air and ground threats. Weather systems are enhanced with a Predictive Windshear Warning System. Other items include the future air navigation system with Global Positioning System and Flight Management System/Electronic Flight Instrument System.

Inside the C-32, communications are paramount. The vice president, heads of state and other decision-makers can conduct business anywhere around the world using improved telephones, satellites, television monitors, facsimiles and copy machines. The C-32 has state-of-the-art avionics equipment.

Background
The C-32 is a military version of the Boeing 757-200 extended range aircraft, selected along with the C-37A to replace the aging fleet of C-137 aircraft. Active-duty aircrews from the 1st Airlift Squadron, 89th Airlift Wing at Andrews Air Force Base, Md., fly the aircraft.

The contract was awarded for the C-32 in August 1996. By using commercial off-the-shelf acquisition practices, a new record has been set from contract award to aircraft delivery -- less than two years. The C-32 is the first military aircraft ever to be acquired in this manner. The 89th Airlift Wing acquired the first of four aircraft in late June 1998.

General Characteristics
Primary Function: High-priority personnel transport
Builder: Boeing Company
Power Plant: Two Pratt and Whitney 2040 engines
Thrust: 41,700 pounds static thrust each engine
Length: 155 feet, 3 inches (47.32 meters)
Height: 44 feet, 6 inches (11.02 meters)
Wingspan: 124 feet, 8 inches (37.99 meters)
Maximum Takeoff Weight: 255,000 pounds (115,668 kilograms)
Range: 5,500 nautical miles unrefueled range
Ceiling: 42,000 feet (12,727 meters)
Speed: 530 miles per hour (Mach 0.8)
Load: 45 passengers
Unit Cost: Unavailable
Crew: 16 (varies with mission)
Date Deployed: June 19, 1998
Inventory: Active force, 4; ANG: 0; Reserve: 0

Point of Contact
89th Airlift Wing, Public Affairs Office; 1535 Command Dr, Ste A209A;
Andrews AFB MD 20762-7002; DSN 858-4511 or (301) 981-4511.

January 2006

 http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=90

If the third plane is from Andrews AFB, it would probabaly be a high level Bush/Cheney "remote viewing platform" with their minions in direct contact with Bush in Florida and Cheney in the secondary bunker under the White House, since they certainly would be unable to trust the whole "patriot loyal" Air Force regular staff with such treasonous questions about "well, did it hit yet?"

Perhaps, if it is a slightly repainted C32, it definitely would link up our treasonous excutive branch of Bush and Cheney directly with their "eye in the sky" at the WTCs that they could send up with some of their minions to watch the New York Action and report back on highly scrambled communication lines directly to the White House Cheney bunker that no one else would be privy to at all.

If Bush had Air Force One with him in Florida, then the Air Force Two at Andrews AFB would indeed be available. Where was Air Force Two on 9-11-01?

It fits even more hideously well since that would be Cheney's plane. Perhaps Cheney sent it there to watch and report on his treasonous deeds because he could trust no one with what he was doing through the regular communication lines.
third plane: total white body, blue/dark wings, blue/dark tail
third plane: total white body, blue/dark wings, blue/dark tail
Cheney's C32? non-total white body, blue/dark wings, blue/dark tail
Cheney's C32? non-total white body, blue/dark wings, blue/dark tail


United decoy? non-total white body, non blue/dark wings, blue/dark tail
United decoy? non-total white body, non blue/dark wings, blue/dark tail