portland independent media center  
images audio video
composted article reporting global

9.11 investigation

FOUR TRAITORs, The DEVIL is in the Details! IMPEACH!!!!

see summary in article below
 http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/253152.shtml (DETAILS)
Four Traitors: The Devil is in the Details! Impeach

Martha Stewart got jail time for insider trading.
Cheney sold his Halliburton Stock while he knew the Dresser purchase carried asbestos liability and the Halliburton stocks would plunge,(all others who owned it at that time, including pension plans lost big time)
and he wasn't charged with inside trading,

Instead he was able to be appointed by the Supreme Court as VICE president,after Delay's cronies stopped the count in brother Jeb Bush's Florida, and as present commander in chief that day in the underground bunker, leader of multiple drills were going on in a simulation of planes attacking buildings, to confuse ground workers on 911, even though Condolesa Rice, who had to be evacuated from a G8 summit in Italy to aircraft carriers because of threats to attack hotels with airplanes months earlier, said "who would ever dream anyone would use jet liners as weapons, Cheney had plans with PNAC for the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq way before 911,and in Rebuilding America's defenses it was said a New Pearl Harbor was needed. Bush had told Paul O'Neill, economy chief who quit, he wanted to finish Sadamn two years before 911.

Rumsfeld at the Pentagon screamed there are absolutely no survivors...
and couldn't account for the missing
defense money....4.5 Trillion dollars couldn't be accounted for by Dov Zacheim as Payroll keeper at Pentagon...
He called it a "Hot handle...." and laughed.

Chertoff,dual Israeli American, deported the Dancing Israelis who later were found to be Mossad agents who failed 7 lie detector tests, and Covered up Bush's financial ties to the Bin Laden family, and actually let a financier of Bin Laden walk. Contributed to writing the Patriot Act, the worst assault on the Bill of Rights ever, married to Julie L.Myers. She was made head of
Immigration And Customs Enforcement Bureau at the Department of Homeland Security.
She's Chertoff's wife. Nice . She is also the niece of former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Richard B. Myers. Now Bush is talking about building an Israeli fence on the border. Why not alligators rounded up from Florida, sent on Flooded New Orleans busses and dumped into the Rio Grande. A Border plan with teeth!

Now the National Guard will be sent to the border, but not to Guard, detain, or arrest illegals, but to answer phones, without ammunition.

Chertoff not aware citizens were dying at the Convention Center in New Orleans , even though CNN was broadcasting it, sends Blackwater killer mercenaries to New Orleans.

Several people were warned not to fly 911, only three Israeli citizens died at the WTC not the hundred forty plus Bush claimed in the State of the Union, thanks to Odigo, And top WTC VIPS were invited to a bash in Colorado that day by Warren Buffet, place where Bush was finally taken... from the school photo op.

Larry Silverstein who admitted pulling WTC 7, forty seven story WTC 7, 2 years later on a documentary, wins insurance on WTC but wants two payments because there were two planes, Everything there was pulverized to dust but not Atta's visa, cancer killing dust for which hero WTC rescuer James Zagruda's daughter still is not collecting his full pension, nor were his medical bills paid for.

Halliburton wins no bid contract in Iraq, and the contract to build concentration camps in America.

Bush family admits criminal behavior:
What part of "if the American people had ever known the truth of what we Bush's have done to this nation, we would be chased down the streets and lynched" don't you understand?

Of course, would anyone, Mr. Snow, dare comment about Mr. Ex President Bush's statement
Famous Quote of George Bush Senior:" You can fool some of the people all the time, and these are the ones you want to concentrate on"
I also remember he said "Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."

George Bush Senior speaking in an interview with
Sarah McClendon in December 1992

Because they in the oath of Skull and Bones swear allegiance to the world's elite getting richer, at any cost.

Including allowing a porous border for 5 years after 911, which
the final 911 investigation team recommended immediately sealed, the first pick Bush made, Henry Kissinger not being acceptable.
Yes Bush's first pick to head an investigation, same one wanted for war crimes by international court, same who said:

"It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of what is perceived to be true." -- Henry Kissinger

"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy." Henry Kissinger, quoted by Bob Woodward in The Final Days, 1976

"Today Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government."

-- Henry Kissinger, from his grand finale address at the Bilderberger meeting at Evian, France, 21 May 1992

Individuals who knew beforehand the deep financial liabilities of their holdings, and profited greatly from the 911 attack
Bush Family
Peterson, Blackstone Mortgage holder on WTC, and Council of Foreign Relations.

These are the reasons why America is

no longer in favor of the leaders who have miserably failed us.

Four Traitors: The Devil is in the Details! Impeach
author: rese
May 20, 2006 02:20

This is about Four traitors who refuse to uphold the Constitution!


O'Neill: Bush planned Iraq invasion before 9/11
In new book, ex-Treasury secretary criticizes administration
Wednesday, January 14, 2004 Posted: 2:12 AM EST (0712 GMT)

Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill served nearly two years in Bush's Cabinet.


Story Tools


• U.S. economy chiefs quit
• White House to economic advisers: Resign
• Democrats broaden criticism of administration on Iraq

Paul O'Neill

George W. Bush


White House

or Create your own

Manage alerts | What is this?

(CNN) -- The Bush administration began planning to use U.S. troops to invade Iraq within days after the former Texas governor entered the White House three years ago, former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill told CBS News' 60 Minutes.

"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go," O'Neill told CBS, according to excerpts released Saturday by the network. "For me, the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do whatever we decide to do, is a really huge leap."

O'Neill, who served nearly two years in Bush's Cabinet, was asked to resign by the White House in December 2002 over differences he had with the president's tax cuts. O'Neill was the main source for "The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O'Neill," by former Wall Street Journal reporter Ron Suskind.

The CBS report is scheduled to be broadcast Sunday night; the book is to be released Tuesday by publisher Simon & Schuster.

Suskind said O'Neill and other White House insiders gave him documents showing that in early 2001 the administration was already considering the use of force to oust Saddam, as well as planning for the aftermath.

"There are memos," Suskind told the network. "One of them marked 'secret' says 'Plan for Post-Saddam Iraq.'"

Suskind cited a Pentagon document titled "Foreign Suitors For Iraqi Oilfield Contracts," which, he said, outlines areas of oil exploration. "It talks about contractors around the world from ... 30, 40 countries and which ones have what intentions on oil in Iraq."

In the book, O'Neill is quoted as saying he was surprised that no one in a National Security Council meeting asked why Iraq should be invaded.

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying 'Go find me a way to do this,'" O'Neill said.

Suskind also described a White House meeting in which he said Bush seemed to waver about going forward with a second round of tax cuts.

"Haven't we already given money to rich people... Shouldn't we be giving money to the middle?" Suskind says Bush asked, according to what CBS called a "nearly verbatim" transcript of an economic team meeting Suskind said he obtained from someone at the meeting.

O'Neill also said in the book that President Bush "was like a blind man in a roomful of deaf people" during Cabinet meetings.

One-on-one meetings were no different, O'Neill told the network.

Describing his first such meeting with Bush, O'Neill said, "I went in with a long list of things to talk about and, I thought, to engage [him] on. ... I was surprised it turned out me talking and the president just listening. It was mostly a monologue."

White House spokesman Scott McClellan brushed off O'Neill's criticism.

"We appreciate his service, but we are not in the business of doing book reviews," he told reporters. "It appears that the world according to Mr. O'Neill is more about trying to justify his own opinion than looking at the reality of the results we are achieving on behalf of the American people. The president will continue to be forward-looking, focusing on building upon the results we are achieving to strengthen the economy and making the world a safer and better place."

A senior administration official, who asked not to be named, expressed bewilderment at O'Neill's comments on the alleged war plans.

"The treasury secretary is not in the position to have access to that kind of information, where he can make observations of that nature," the official said. "This is a head-scratcher."

Even before the interview is broadcast, the topic became grist for election-year politics.

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, who is the early front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, issued a statement in response.

"I've always said the president had failed to make the case to go to war with Iraq," Dean said. "My Democratic opponents reached a different conclusion, and in the process, they failed to ask the difficult questions. Now, after the fact, we are learning new information about the true circumstances of the Bush administration's push for war, this time, by one of his former Cabinet secretaries.

"The country deserves to know -- and the president needs to answer -- why the American people were presented with misleading or manufactured intelligence as to why going to war with Iraq was necessary."

Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts also issued a statement. In 2002, Kerry voted to support a resolution giving Bush authority to wage war against Iraq if it didn't dismantle its presumed illegal weapons program.

"These are very serious charges. It would mean [Bush administration officials] were dead-set on going to war alone since almost the day they took office and deliberately lied to the American people, Congress, and the world," Kerry said. "It would mean that for purely ideological reasons they planned on putting American troops in a shooting gallery, occupying an Arab country almost alone. The White House needs to answer these charges truthfully because they threaten to shatter [its] already damaged credibility as never before."

TO ASSIST MR. BUSH, was VICE President Dick Cheney:

On 9/11: Was the Asbestos-Laced World Trade Center "Disposable"?
author: anAmerican
Millions in the U.S. and worldwide now know there is evidence that 9/11 was an "inside job"; "false-flag," state-sponsored terrorism to provide a pretext for a premeditated war. But in exposing this evidence, the 9/11 Truth effort is also shedding light on a significant story-within-the-story: that the World Trade Center (WTC) was obsolete and asbestos-laced, and that its destruction on 9/11 may, for certain interests in the U.S., have been both desirable and profitable--independent of any interest in war.
(Note: This article is written with empathy for all who were injured or who lost loved ones on September 11, 2001 or in the wars that followed, and with deep respect for the memory of all who have died. It is also written out of the conviction that important facts about the 9/11 events have been "officially" covered up and that the truth must be brought to light. Though the subject matter is profoundly troubling, the writer hopes this article will offer some new perspectives, raise new questions, and assist others who are seeking truth in the interest of preventing future troubles.)

Thanks to volunteers in the grassroots "9/11 Truth" movement, wise and dedicated researchers, and a growing number of whistleblowers, many millions in the U.S. and worldwide now know there is evidence that 9/11 was an "inside job"; an example of "false-flag," state-sponsored terrorism to provide a pretext for a premeditated war.* But in exposing this evidence, the 9/11 Truth effort is also shedding light on a significant story-within-the-story: that the World Trade Center (WTC) was obsolete and asbestos-laced, and that its destruction on 9/11 may, for certain interests in the U.S., have been both desirable and profitable--independent of any interest in war.

(Heresy, you say? Please read on.)

Thanks to the 9/11 Truth movement, millions worldwide know that the "independent" 9/11 Commission included key members with uncomfortably close ties to the current and former White House administrations, and that the Commission's official report obscures, twists, or even ignores many crucial facts and much of the known evidence.

Millions worldwide have learned that WTC Building 7's collapse was NOT due to fire; the owner of Building 7--a 47-story, steel-framed, late 1980s-era skyscraper which was NOT hit by an airplane on 9/11--personally stated in a 2002 Public Broadcasting System documentary that he ordered that Building 7 be "pulled" (i.e., demolished, via controlled demolition using explosive charges) on the afternoon of 9/11. [1] (The 9/11 Commission's report makes no mention of Building 7.) Millions worldwide are also convinced the World Trade Center's twin towers were intentionally destroyed (pulverized, actually) via controlled demolition; they did not "collapse" from the heat of burning jet fuel, which burns far too coolly to "melt" structural steel--not to mention steel coated with asbestos fireproofing.

(If you haven't seen the stunning video of the speedy, sudden, vertical demise-by-demolition of Building 7, you can view it right now, at  http://wtc7.net [2])

But as more eyewitness and expert reports surface regarding the controlled demolition, reports are also revealing that the buildings--in particular, the twin towers--were functionally obsolete and plagued with problems, including asbestos-related problems which would have been extremely expensive to solve. And just a few months before 9/11 (and just weeks before transferring the WTC into privatized ownership), the Port Authority of New York lost its ten-year legal battle with insurers over the cost of needed asbestos-abatement work in the WTC.

It's becoming clear that the World Trade Center buildings were, in a word, "disposable."

It's also becoming clear that disposing of the World Trade Center may have been highly profitable for certain parties, separate and apart from the military/industrial/political profits being reaped in the so-called "War on Terrorism" which 9/11 made possible and which apparently will never end (perhaps because a "War on Terrorism" is, by definition, unwinnable).

(And it's totally clear that the "attack" on the Pentagon, by destroying a mostly unoccupied section of the building, hit the Pentagon where it was most "disposable.")

Here are the topics explored in the rest of this article:

> The World Trade Center: obsolete and plagued with problems
> A lengthy, pre-9/11 legal battle over the WTC's asbestos problems
> Cheney, Halliburton, the Bush family, and asbestos
> The WTC's change to private ownership--just weeks before 9/11
> Have private profits been realized in the wake of 9/11?
> How "controlled demolition" might have been orchestrated
> Was "9/11" actually orchestrated to MINIMIZE loss of life?
> The American public's growing awareness of a 9/11 coverup
> Final thoughts: on 9/11, the prospect of "another 9/11," FEMA, and Hurricane Katrina
> References cited
> Other resources: books, articles, video, and audio
> The Miami Herald's February 1, 2006 column on 9/11 questions

It's uncomfortable to think about these things. But the more we face discomfort and demand justice and accountability now, the better our chance of preventing future discomfort, future cover-ups, future losses of life, and a future of endless worldwide war.

* (If you're unfamiliar with the concept of "false-flag" terrorism, see Webster Tarpley's book listed below in Other Resources, in which Tarpley makes his case that "The orchestration of the terror attacks...was the handiwork of [a] rogue network inside the U.S. government, and not a product of an Afghan cave..." Also, read about Operation Northwoods in Tarpley's or Michael Ruppert's books, and read about GLADIO and the "strategy of tension" in Tarpley's book--or in Michael Parenti's 1997 book, "Blackshirts & Reds," from City Lights Books.)


Those who thought the World Trade Center comprised some of New York's most desirable office space may have been mistaken.

In "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man," author John Perkins reflects on a walk he took through lower Manhattan shortly after 9/11:

"I recalled reading that the World Trade Center was a project started by David Rockefeller in 1960, and that in recent years the complex had been considered an ALBATROSS. It had the reputation of being A FINANCIAL MISFIT, unsuited to modern fiber-optic and Internet technologies, and burdened with an inefficient and costly elevator system. Those two towers once had been nicknamed David and Nelson. Now the albatross was gone." [3] [with emphasis added]

More detail comes from Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall in their new book, "9/11 Revealed":

"The WTC began in disaster, just as it ended. A grossly misconceived Soviet-style land-development catastrophe...[it] was OBSOLETE LONG BEFORE IT WAS FINISHED. ...The oversized...site destroyed swathes of human-scale streetscape...the towers...stole light from buildings all across Manhattan. Their exterior-frame structure maximized interior space while minimizing views and making office workers depressed [the windows were barely wider than the 16"-wide steel exterior columns]. Space-saving on elevators that involved two changes up and down made for lengthy journey times. ...It would take a full two hours to evacuate everybody in a fire." [4] [with emphasis added]

Morgan and Henshall go on to note that BY 2001, MUCH OF THE TOWERS' OFFICE SPACE WAS EMPTY. The towers were due for a "mid-life rehab," but building codes would have REQUIRED REMOVAL OF THE ASBESTOS FIREPROOFING lining the towers' ceilings and steel framework. According to Morgan and Henshall, "Such a job would have been unrealistically expensive and physically impractical, with no gain in [rental] revenues." [5] [with emphasis added]

(In spite of these problems, it's worth remembering that given the proximity of major airports, the towers were DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND THE CRASH OF A FULLY LOADED, FUEL-FILLED BOEING 707--a large, four-engine airliner. This has been reported in numerous books and articles.)


The WTC's original owner, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, had been concerned about asbestos-abatement issues for many years prior to 9/11.

According to Karl Schwarz [6] and other writers, the Port Authority in 1991 filed suit in U.S. District Court against insurers in the hope of recovering funds to help pay for needed asbestos-abatement work at the WTC and one of the region's airports. In the suit, "Port Authority of NY vs. Affiliated FM Insurance Co.," the Port Authority sought between 500 million and 1 billion dollars from the insurers.

Note that this suit was filed TWO YEARS BEFORE the first so-called "terrorist attack" on the WTC; the truck-bomb explosion in the Center's underground parking garage in 1993.

Schwarz reports that the U.S. District Court judge ruled against the Port Authority as of May 14, 2001.

Less than three months later, the Port Authority transferred ownership of the WTC buildings to private investors.


Dick Cheney, Halliburton, Inc., and, reportedly, the Bush family are surprisingly well acquainted with asbestos-related concerns. [7]

On December 18, 2002, CBS News reported that Halliburton "has agreed to pay about $4 billion in cash and stock to settle hundreds of thousands of asbestos claims against it." Reportedly, Halliburton inherited its asbestos liability from Harbison-Walker, a unit of Halliburton's subsidiary Dresser Industries, and from Halliburton's Kellog Brown & Root subsidiary.

On December 13, 2001, the World Socialist Web Site reported that "During the 2000 election campaign critics noted that in the last several years Cheney and Halliburton had contributed $157,500 to congressional candidates who had co-sponsored legislation to cut off victims' rights to a fair recovery when injured or killed as a result of asbestos exposure."

And on August 11, 2002, The Olympian (from Olympia, WA), carried a Washington Post article noting that:

"Dresser had close ties to a family Cheney knew well: the Bushes. Cheney's boss while he served as Secretary of Defense, President George H.W. Bush, was once being groomed to run Dresser, a company that Bush's father and grandfather had reshaped decades earlier.

When Dresser went public in the 1920s, it turned to W.A. Harriman & Co., whose president was George Herbert Walker, grandfather and namesake to former president Bush. Prescott Bush, the former president's father, helped organize Dresser and select its new president, H. Neil Mallon. Prescott Bush eventually sat on the board and by 1941, still held 1,900 shares of Dresser stock. Mallon was so close to former president Bush that he described him in his autobiography as "surrogate uncle and father-confessor." One of his sons, Neil Mallon Bush, is named after him. After World War II, Mallon employed George H.W. Bush and Dresser executives expected him to take over the company, according to journalist Darwin Payne, who wrote a history of Dresser. Instead, the former president left to prospect for oil.

While Cheney saw sound business reasons for acquiring Dresser, there was a problem in its past -- the use of asbestos in Harbison-Walker division products."


On July 24, 2001, private investors (Silverstein Properties, with minority partner Westfield America, Inc.) took control of the WTC under a 99-year lease.

In "Waking Up From Our Nightmare," Paul and Hoffman note that the WTC's estimated value at the time was 8 billion dollars. [8]

According to professor of economics Michel Chossudovsky, the lease called for payments to the Port Authority "amounting to 3.2 billion dollars in installments" payable over 99 years. With several hundred million dollars being provided by mortgage holders, Mr. Silverstein put just 14 million dollars of his own money into the deal. [9]

Quoting from a May 20, 2002 article in The New Yorker, Chossudovsky notes that "Explicity included in the [lease] agreement was that Silverstein and Westfield 'WERE GIVEN THE RIGHT TO REBUILD THE STRUCTURES IF THEY WERE DESTROYED.' " [9] [with emphasis added]

Paul and Hoffman add that "Quoting the British Financial Times of September 14, 2001, the American Reporter wrote that 'THE LEASE HAS AN ALL-IMPORTANT ESCAPE CLAUSE: IF THE BUILDINGS ARE STRUCK BY "AN ACT OF TERRORISM," THE NEW OWNERS' OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE LEASE ARE VOID. As a result, the new owners are not required to make any payments under their lease, but they will be able to collect on the loss of the buildings...destroyed and damaged in the attacks.' " (The American Reporter's article was titled "No Fraud, but Huge Profits Seen in World Trade Center Attacks.") [8] [with emphasis added]

It's also reported that Mr. Silverstein is "a large contributor to Democrat and Republican office-holders." [8]


Many writers have addressed this question--and the question of whether insurance companies (and courts) would regard the 9/11 events at the WTC as a single incident or would regard each "attack" on a WTC tower as a separate incident for insurance purposes.

Paul and Hoffman report that as of 2004, "Silverstein Properties [was] still contesting the amount of [insurance] pay-out due for destruction of the Twin Towers--$3.55 billion for one 'occurrence' or $7.1 billion for two 'occurrences.' " [8]

A March 28, 2006 "Reader Rant" posting at www.capitolhillblue.com offers the following update, quoting from press reports: "In late 2004, [Mr. Silverstein was] tentatively awarded $2.2 billion, double what insurance companies offered to pay him. (UPI, 12/6/04) A judge also [made] a ruling that keeps open the possibility [Silverstein] could eventually receive as much as $6.4 billion. (Associated Press, 12/7/04)." [10]

As for Building 7, Paul and Hoffman note that unlike the rest of the WTC, this building was originally developed by Silverstein Properties, and Silverstein Properties was its leaseholder as of 9/11. They write that "About $386 million had been invested in WTC7 before its destruction," and that Silverstein Properties and Building 7's mortgage holders "received a court-awarded amount of $861 million dollars from Industrial Risk Insurers in February 2002." [8]


If the WTC buildings were brought down using conventional demolition techniques, teams of demolition engineers or contractors would have required ample advance (pre-9/11) access to place explosive charges throughout the buildings' steel structures.

How could anyone have gained this access--and bypassed the buildings' security guards and systems?

One clue came from New York's Newsday on September 12, 2001: "The WTC was DESTROYED JUST DAYS AFTER A HEIGHTENED SECURITY ALERT WAS LIFTED AT THE LANDMARK 110-STORY TOWERS... The security detail had been working 12-hour shifts...because of numerous phone threats. But ON THURSDAY [September 6], BOMB-SNIFFING DOGS WERE ABRUPTLY REMOVED." [11] [with emphasis added]

Other reports stated that the WTC's south tower underwent a pre-announced (three weeks in advance) "power-down" on the weekend before 9/11, ostensibly for a cabling upgrade to improve the WTC's computer bandwith. With power off on floors 48-110, security cameras and electronic security locks on doors were inoperative, giving teams of "engineers" free access throughout at least the upper floors. (It also seems conceivable that vacant office space in either tower may have afforded an opportunity for demolition personnel--posing, perhaps, as remodeling contractors--to do preparatory tasks in the days or weeks before 9/11.)

Another report, quoting from the Utne Reader, noted that as of 9/11, Marvin Bush, brother of George W. Bush, was a "principal" with Securacom (aka Stratesec), the company "that provided security for the WTC, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport." [12] Other reports identify Bush family relative Wirt Walker as a top executive of Securacom.

(Some 9/11 researchers and authors have addressed the possibility that the twin towers' demolition may have involved the use of non-conventional demolition techniques and/or sophisticated technologies that would be available only within the military/defense establishment. Certain news reports from Iraq and Afghanistan suggest that the U.S. military possesses high-tech weapon technologies that are highly destructive in an urban setting, but further discussion of this is beyond the scope of this article.)


At least two books offer relevant insights:

From Morgan and Henshall:

"The presumed hijackers were bloodthirsty religious fanatics, but in this macabre sense the 9/11 events were spectacularly unsuccessful: about 54,000 people worked in the Twin Towers or were visiting during office hours, and fewer than 2,600 were killed or disappeared. At the Pentagon there were over 20,000 staff, of whom 125 were killed or reported missing. If the hijackers had flown into the World Trade Center an hour or two later, or crashed into the roof of the Pentagon, instead of into the reinforced wall of an almost unoccupied segment, they could have killed thousands more... For believers in the official [9/11] story, if they noticed it at all, this was chance. For many 9/11 skeptics it was an indication the attacks had somehow been engineered." [13]

And from Eliot Weinberger's remarkable little book, "9/12":

"Because the attack happened early in the morning, the nearly 3,000 people who died were generally of three types: first, poor people--most of them black, Hispanic, or recent immigrants--who worked as janitors, handymen, food deliverers, and so on, in the towers and the adjoining buildings; second, low-ranking white collar workers: the secretaries and junior managers who had to be in the office before the bosses arrived; and third, firemen, policemen, and other rescue workers. VERY FEW TITANS OF CAPITALISM OR PEOPLE IN POWER DIED THAT DAY." [14] [with emphasis added]

After elaborating on the Bush administration's use of 9/11 to advance an aggressive, premeditated military agenda, Weinberger concludes:

"For the White House Team, the hijacked planes were a blessing from the sky." [14]

Is it possible the events of 9/11 were designed to cause "only enough" deaths to mobilize the American people to support a war--and to win the sympathy and support of other nations?

The neoconservative Project For The New American Century's report "Rebuilding America's Defenses," published in September, 2000, suggests that Americans (and Congress?) would be reluctant to support a rapid, costly "transformation" of the military--to aggressively establish and enforce the neocon's planned global "Pax Americana"--in the absence of "some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor." And as of 2002, PNAC's website identified the lead author of this report, Thomas Donnelly, as a "top official" of military contractor Lockheed-Martin.

Is it merely a coincidence that the number of deaths on 9/11 was so close to the number who died in Pearl Harbor?


Even two years ago--before many of the most comprehensive "9/11 Truth" books, articles, and videos were available--polls indicated that most Americans suspected a government cover-up of key facts about 9/11.

In "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions," prominent theologian Dr. David Ray Griffin cites an April, 2004 CBS/New York Times poll in which "56% of the American public believed that the Bush administration was 'mostly telling the truth but hiding something' regarding its pre-9/11 foreknowledge, "while 16% believed that it was 'mostly lying.' " As Dr. Griffin notes, "This means that...AN ASTONISHING 72%...BELIEVED THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION TO BE GUILTY OF A COVER-UP, AT LEAST TO SOME DEGREE, OF RELEVANT INFORMATION IT HAD PRIOR TO THE ATTACKS OF 9/11." [15] [with emphasis added]

Since April, 2004, much more information has become available, including most of the books and videos listed below and the many articles available at websites including:

 http://911research.wtc7.net, www.globalresearch.ca,
www.prisonplanet.com, and

In the past year, a growing number of scholars, former U.S. government officials and employees, New Yorkers (including firefighters) with firsthand knowledge, and, most recently, actor Charlie Sheen and (Lt. Col.) Dr. Robert M. Bowman--former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents Ford and Carter--have publicly stepped forward to expose lies and to demand truth and accountability.

Several hosts on Air America Radio are asking piercing questions about 9/11, host Mike Malloy has featured in-depth live interviews of 9/11 researchers Dr. David Ray Griffin and Michael Ruppert, and other media outlets--including some in the "mainstream"--are beginning to wake up and ask intelligent questions. [See the Miami Herald column at the end of this article.]


Three months after 9/11--on December 12, 2001--George W. Bush said this about his first year in office:

"But all in all, it's been a fabulous year for Laura and me." [16]

Since then, administration officials and others have suggested it's virtually certain that the United States will suffer another so-called "terrorist attack," one that may be far worse than the events of 9/11.

Considering what we now know, would it be merely coincidental if another "attack" also targeted and destroyed something that was already obsolete, problem-plagued, closed for remodeling (a la the Pentagon on 9/11), earmarked for "redevelopment," or otherwise "disposable"?

Would it be merely coincidental if another "attack" appeared to create vast opportunities for private profit?

What can we conclude in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina other than that certain government officials or agencies (or their private contractors) considered a large number of New Orleans residents to be "disposable"? Many questions need to be asked about FEMA's activities in New Orleans. Did FEMA "fail" to assist needy residents, or did it actually "succeed" by scattering tens of thousands of residents, branded as refugees, to some forty-one states and far from their homes, so their former neighborhoods could become profitable redevelopment projects?

What was FEMA's role on 9/11, given that FEMA HAD ON THE NIGHT BEFORE SEPTEMBER 11 SET UP OPERATIONS IN A NEW YORK PIER NOT FAR FROM THE WTC, in preparation for a "bioterrorism exercise" which was scheduled to take place on 9/11. Was it mere coincidence, then, that when Mayor Giuliani's fortified emergency command center (in WTC Building 7) was destroyed, the Mayor could use FEMA's nearby setup as his command center?

And what can we all do now to prevent any more "disposals," needless deaths, cover-ups, "FEMA failures," made-for-TV skyscraper demolition derbies, and immoral premeditated wars?

The references and resources below will help us find some answers.


[1] Don Paul and Jim Hoffman, "Waking Up From Our Nightmare: The 9/11/01 Crimes in New York City," 2004, page 19 (available via  http://wtc7.net and www.wireonfire.com/donpaul)

[2]  http://wtc7.net (also available elsewhere online)

[3] John Perkins, "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man," 2004, page 194

[4] Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall, "9/11 Revealed: The Unanswered Questions," 2005, pages 61-64

[5] Morgan and Henshall, op. cit., page 63

[6] Karl Schwarz, "PANY & NJ," February 7, 2006, at www.theperfectsystem.net/guest_articles/karlschwarz/ks_20706.htm

[7] CBS News, "Halliburton OKs $4B Asbestos Payment," December 18, 2002.
David Walsh, World Socialist Web Site, "US: shares of Cheney's former company hit hard," December 13, 200.
James V. Grimaldi, Washington Post, "Halliburton's quagmire becomes Cheney's liability: Purchase of rival mired company in asbestos woes," August 11, 2002 (available at Google's cache from The Olympian newspaper, at link to

[8] Paul and Hoffman, op. cit., page 17

[9] Michel Chossudovsky, "Who Are the Financial Actors Behind the WTC?", March 12, 2004, at www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO403B.html [See also "The WTC Towers Collapse: An Enormous Insurance Scam" at www.globalresearch.ca/articles/WTC312A.html]

[10] link to readerrant.capitolhillblue.com

[11] Curtis L. Taylor and Sean Gardiner, "Heightened Security Alert Had Just Been Lifted," New York Newsday, September 12, 2001, www.NYnewsday.com

[12] Utne Reader article excerpts presented as "9/11 Security Courtesy of Marvin Bush" at www.whatreallyhappened.com/911security.html

[13] Morgan and Henshall, op. cit., page 13

[14] Eliot Weinberger, "9/12," 2003, pages 65-67 (info at www.prickly-paradigm.com)

[15] Dr. David Ray Griffin, "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions," 2005, page 3

[16] Mark Crispin Miller, "The Bush Dyslexicon: Observations on a National Disorder," 2002 paperback edition, page 349


BOOK: Webster G. Tarpley, "9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA," 2004 (info at www.tarpley.net)

BOOK: Dr. David Ray Griffin, "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11," 2003

BOOK: Michael Ruppert, "Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil," 2004

BOOK: Jim Marrs, "Inside Job: Unmasking the 9/11 Conspiracies," 2003

ARTICLE: (Re: Lt. Col. Robert Bowman) Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones, "Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect: Official version of events a conspiracy theory, says drills were cover for attacks," at link to www.prisonplanet.com

ARTICLE: Dr. David Ray Griffin, "The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie," at www.911truth.org

ARTICLE: Dr. David Ray Griffin, "The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," at www.globalresearch.ca

ARTICLE: Dr. David Ray Griffin, "9/11: Possible Motives Of The Bush Administration," at www.globalresearch.ca

VIDEO: "The Great Conspiracy" (info at www.oilempire.us/movies.html)

LOTS OF AUDIO (at no charge): www.takingaim.info (click on "Archive"; see also the many links at www.911truth.org)

(And don't forget www.911truth.org, ,  http://911research.wtc7.net, www.globalresearch.ca, www.arcticbeacon.com, www.prisonplanet.com, and www.fromthewilderness.com)


(Originally published on Wednesday, February 1, 2006 by the Miami Herald; presented here as posted at  http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0201-28.htm)

"9/11 Attacks: Avoiding the Hard Questions"
by Robert Steinback

I was 8 years old when President John Kennedy was shot to death in Dallas in 1963. If grace favors me, I'll be 62 when documents related to the assassination are released to the public, and 84 when the Warren Commission's investigative files into the tragedy are finally opened.

That's a long time to wait for a chance to evaluate the purported truth.

It's a blot on the presumed sophistication of the people of the United States that any aspect of an event so dramatic and shocking should be kept from us. Perhaps it's true, to abuse the line from A Few Good Men yet again, that we can't handle the truth. But there cannot be genuine resolution as long as such critical information remains concealed.

Transformed by 9/11

Since Kennedy's assassination, Americans have lurched between demanding to know and plugging their ears: The Pentagon Papers, My Lai, the King assassination, Watergate, Iran-contra, the savings-and-loan debacle, Monicagate. Lately, however, it would seem the public's verdict is in: Don't tell us. Keep us in the dark. We don't want to know.

This is the worst possible time for probe-ophobia to grip us. Our nation was irretrievably transformed by 9/11 -- and yet there remain troubling questions about what really happened before, during and after that day. Rather than demanding a full and fearless vetting to hone in on the truth and silence the conjecture about 9/11, many Americans remain unwilling to peer into the microscope.

An online cottage industry of theorists, theory debunkers and debunker debunkers has flourished since 9/11. Sometimes the flimsy theories are easy to spot -- come on, if the four passenger jets didn't crash where it appears they did, where did they go? More often, though, the cases aren't so obvious.

A group of experts and academicians 'devoted to applying the principles of scientific reasoning to the available evidence, `letting the chips fall where they may,' '' last week accused the government of covering up evidence that the three destroyed New York City buildings were brought down that day by controlled demolition rather than structural failure. The group, called Scholars for 9/11 Truth, has a website, www.st911.org.

Unanswered Questions

The reflexive first reaction is incredulity -- how, one asks, could anyone even contemplate, never mind actually do such a barbaric thing? But before you shut your mind, check the resumés -- these aren't Generation X geeks subsisting on potato chips and PlayStation. Then look at the case they present.

''I am a professional philosopher who has spent 35 years teaching logic, critical thinking and scientific reasoning,'' group co-founder and University of Minnesota professor James H. Fetzer told me. ``When I come to 9/11, it's not hard for me to determine what is going on. This is a scientific question. And it is so elementary that I don't think you can find a single physicist who could disagree with the idea that this was a controlled demolition.''

The group asks, for example,

• How did a fire fed by jet fuel, which at most burns at 1,700 degrees Fahrenheit, cause the collapse of the Twin Towers, built of steel that melts at 2,800 degrees? (Most experts agree that the impact of airliners, made mostly of lightweight aluminum, should not have been enough alone to cause structural failure.) How could a single planeload of burning jet fuel -- most of which flared off in the initial fireball -- cause the South World Trade Center tower to collapse in just 56 minutes?

• Why did building WTC-7 fall, though no aircraft struck it? Fire alone had never before caused a steel skyscraper to collapse.

• Why did all three buildings collapse largely into their own footprints -- in the style of a controlled demolition?

• Why did no U.S. military jet intercept the wayward aircraft?

• Why has there been no investigation of BBC reports that five of the alleged 9/11 hijackers were alive and accounted for after the event?

Our current probe-ophobia is due in part to the political landscape: When one party holds all the cards, any call to investigate an alleged abuse of power or cover-up -- no matter how valid -- will look like a partisan vendetta. Those in power never want to investigate themselves.

Maybe that's politics; he who holds the hammer drives the nails. But the outrage of 9/11 transcends party affiliation.

We need all the outstanding questions answered -- wherever the chips may fall.




BringTheTruthOut link

Change is in the wind, but remember that The Enemy is also aware of this. They WILL strike out again if they feel they are being backed into a corner...which is beginning to happen now.

Expect another catastrophic attack if the elites aren't brought to justice sooner than later. We can no longer afford to wait. The powers of evil are at their height in this current time and will not back down without a major struggle.

There are now actually elite insiders who are telling us to expect a nuke attack in the not too distant future. Of course they aren't revealing that it is they themselves who are planning to unleash this attack.

For the record, we are acting too slowly.



Throw the globalists out!



link to video.google.com...



See the writings of Serman Skolnick on the Vatican's control of banks in America.

See who owns most of Chase Manhattan Bank.

See which private banks control the Federal Reserve, do some serious research.

See how the Council of Foreign Relations is Chaired by the same Chairman Peterson, who also chaired Blackstone group, who had been the mortage holder of the WTC and recepient of its insurance after its controlled demolition, because it was a financial impossiblity to remove its asbestoes any other way.

Videos show the truth 30.Apr.2006 15:38


The video by alex jones, 20 minute trailer is an excellent accounting of the demolition of WTC 7 by Larry Silverstein.

Evidence that 9/11 was an Inside Job
Evidence that 9/11 was an Inside Job
author: Bruce Stanley e-mail:  stanley_bruce@hotmail.com
Here is a collection of videos on the web about the events of 911. Necessary viewing for anybody curious as to why this issue continues to be brought up, or who has doubts to the validities of the claim that 911 was an Inside Job.

Alex Jones' seminal documentary 9/11: The Road to Tyranny. Possibly the most comprehensive documentary I've seen, which covers state-sponsored terrorism throughout the ages, including government involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing that you didn't see on tv.

Loose Change Edition 2. Written and Directed by Dylan Avery. A must see.
link to video.google.com change

Loose Change Edition 1. Worth checking out for the intro which focuses on the missle attached to the bottom of the jets.

You Tube is a place to upload videos. This one's worth seeing for David Ray Griffin's speech on CSPAN's Book TV and the subsequent media coverage of his book: The New Pearl Harbor.

A more scientific analysis to the "attacks". Essentially shows that the official story of 9/11 violates the first two of Newton's laws of physics.

The trailer for Loose Change: Edition 2. 3 minutes, a quick intro if you don't have the time to watch all of these other documentaries.

A 20 minute preview of Alex Jones' Martial Law 9/11. Includes several eyewitness interviews on the streets of New York.
link to

A flash video breaking down the impossibility that a plane hit the Pentagon, and showing that it was more likely a military plane which was quickly cleaned up by CIA agents.

Lonelantern.org's September 11th: Evidence To The Contrary. Useful for the intro featuring the pilot to Lone Gunmen, which was created before Sept. 11th and shared eerie similarities to possible motives behind the attacks.

WTC Cover Up 06.May.2006 11:05


Sentinel link

Hitlers dream was to hit NYC Skyscrappers with Suicide Planes. this imformation was cooberated by the Times Discovery Channel last week when the aired the "America bomber Project"

The WTC was put up as a flim flam plan to put the Port of NY in Newark NJ.

They were supposed to revitilize the Ports of NY but instead the built the buildings. The initial plan for the building of the towers vagely resembles what was finally built. There was many suspicious fires in the towers in the 70s. There was bmuch controversy as to why the towers didn't meet NYCs fire codes. The fire of Feb 13 1975 is proof that the building steel would not melt in 1 and halfs of fire exposure.

The buildings were losing money with the state of NY moving its offices to midtown and many of the tenants leaving prior to 911. there were many open floors with no tenants.

If you notice on 911 there no flags hanging in the lobbeys of 1 and two.

God Bless


add a comment on this article

Other related articles showing reasons for destruction 21.Apr.2006 22:26


by Citizens USA Wednesday, Apr. 19, 2006 at 7:54 AM

"I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" To be for domestic enemies is Treason. To cover up a plot that has killed thousands of Americans is Treason.

THE NEOCONS AND KATRINA - A Close Look Behind The Scenes.
author: Beowulf

Larry Silverstein Pulls it Off
link to www.cloakanddagger.de

NAMES: Marc Rich, William Jefferson Clinton, Frank Wisner, George W. Bush, Arthur Andersen, CIA black accounts, Carlyle Group

THEORY: Decades-long theft of tax monies in the trillions of U.S. dollars has left U.S. public finances dangerously hollowed out and ready to collapse in the next storm. The Enron scandal was ready to break out in summer 2001 with potentially devastating consequences for the entire nation and possibly the world financial system. The scandal personnel largely overlaps with the key 9-11 group, such as AIG Director Frank Wisner, son of a CIA founder, ambassador and Clinton drug coordinator in India and an Enron Director. This was merely another Bush-Clinton syndicate operation with close ties to 9-11.

NAMES: Marc Rich, William Jefferson Clinton, Frank Wisner, George W. Bush, Arthur Andersen, CIA black accounts, Carlyle Group

THEORY: Decades-long theft of tax monies in the trillions of U.S. dollars has left U.S. public finances dangerously hollowed out and ready to collapse in the next storm. The Enron scandal was ready to break out in summer 2001 with potentially devastating consequences for the entire nation and possibly the world financial system. The scandal personnel largely overlaps with the key 9-11 group, such as AIG Director Frank Wisner, son of a CIA founder, ambassador and Clinton drug coordinator in India and an Enron Director. This was merely another Bush-Clinton syndicate operation with close ties to 9-11.

NAMES: Marc Rich, William Jefferson Clinton, Frank Wisner, George W. Bush, Arthur Andersen, CIA black accounts, Carlyle Group

THEORY: Decades-long theft of tax monies in the trillions of U.S. dollars has left U.S. public finances dangerously hollowed out and ready to collapse in the next storm. The Enron scandal was ready to break out in summer 2001 with potentially devastating consequences for the entire nation and possibly the world financial system. The scandal personnel largely overlaps with the key 9-11 group, such as AIG Director Frank Wisner, son of a CIA founder, ambassador and Clinton drug coordinator in India and an Enron Director. This was merely another Bush-Clinton syndicate operation with close ties to 9-11.
Systems Engineer

World Trade Center 'Bombing,' An Unwitting Participant Asks; "WHY?"


In 1988, I moved to NYC., seeking architectural photography assignments from various key architects. Before moving there, I asked for help from my prior clients in Denver. One good friend and close ally, Herb Roth, suggested I contact his friends at "Emery-Roth Architects," (No relation) After the usual portfolio review and pricing discussions, Barry Roth, AIA, asked me to cover the "World Trade Center." This assignment, I thought, would be one of the greatest opportunities of my career!

It was widely known that "Ezra Stoller and Associates" and "Norman McGrath" had laboriously photographed the World Trade Center for a period of over one year. They created some of the finest known images of the towers, the most memorable ones are at twilight, with the Statue of Liberty in the foreground. They informed me that Ezra had actually photographed it routinely for something like 6 years.

I was allowed to analyze the firm's existing 'photo files' before I began my coverage. I asked a lot of questions which is how I learned most of the background information I'm about to cover. The 'librarian' at Emery's offices was actually the main corporate secretary, who's demeanor was more like someone you would expect to work under at the Metropolitan Museum, -totally reserved and humorless. This was my first challenge, and frankly a cause for alarm.

Not long after the buildings were built, the WTC owners retained the architect of record, and their photographer, and several principal engineers from the original consulting firm- "to establish the safety of the twin towers." Each of their staff members worked on this project on a 'full-time' contract basis, most of them for a period of about 10 years. By 1989, it was very late in the process, but there were still about 15 current participants involved in all. (I found all these 'facts' to be highly unusual, but perhaps simply beyond my 10+ years experience-level.)

My assignment was to: "apply my Julius Schulman -technique," to photograph both of the towers in their contextual situation. "Not just the buildings, but especially how they 'fit' with the neighborhood.

After a month and a half, I had exhausted my interest in the street vantage-points, so I decided to go up in the towers early one morning, to see which adjacent rooftops could offer the most suitable additional views. It was still too cold to shoot those views. This was between May 9th and May 13, 1989.

Carrying just my light-weight 35mm gear, I was singled-out from the regular building patrons by the lobby guards, which totally surprised me. I explained the nature of my business with a moderate degree of assurance, but was shocked when they reacted as though I had been expected, very matter-of-factly!. One of them phoned upstairs, while another insisted he was sending a guard with me, "to insure that I would arrive at the engineering office in time for our meeting." The suite was labeled: Skilling & Jackson, P.C.. -whom I had knowledge of, but no prior relations with.

Had this been the leasing office, I would have understood the mix-up perfectly. Clearly, this was NOT a situation that could pertain to me in any way. I was not aware that Roth had an office in the building at all, but, like a true 'rookie,' I was feeling keen to discuss my abilities with their 'big guns,' since any contact with such people here could have lead me to major future assignments!

When we arrived at the door to this suite, I was 'very shocked' to see the actual sign on their 'main office door.' The door and jamb itself were of completly service-grade materials, like an ordinary 'back door' at any other suite. The sign was brand new and simply said: Skilling Associates, P.C.. (This was a small engraved laminated sign from an ordinary office supply store.) I thought to myself: Humm, these people have been here over 10 years?

"Everyone sit down and be quiet." "Who's this?," the orator said loudly, starring at me. I said: "I 'm the official photographer from Roth."

{...like who are you and what's it to you buddy, haven't you heard of me? }

Unflinching, somber and businesslike, he said without drawing a breath:

Then, you are to be included, who sent you here?

I said; "Barry Roth- I just got a message from his secretary."

(Which was almost completely true, but she hadn't called about this, to my knowledge! )

He nodded and addressed the full group, then reading from a 4x5 file-card, acknowledged some absentee members and confirmed their knowledge and prior 'agreements of compliance.' He said to the few of us in this special group:

"Listen carefully, nobody gets out of this!"

"Each of you were called here to sign an affidavit of non-disclosure. None of the information from our project can find it's way into the public-eye. Absolutely nothing that we have learned from this project can be revealed to the public because it is potentially damaging to our client. Some of you have enjoyed 10 years of service on this project for our client. Each of the team leaders have recently received raises and additional benefits. { someone } -has already received a new assignment and he will be getting a healthy raise at his new location, {undisclosed}."

"I know this transition will take you by surprise, but there was no other way to handle it. You are all terminated from this project effective immediately! This means you need to clear your desks and surrender all of your files by the end of the day.

I will assist you in getting these papers into the archive cabinets so we can give them to the owners for safekeeping."

"After you have signed these forms, we will have a short recess. You may go to the Cafe, or to 'Windows' for lunch, but don't leave the buildings! I want you all to know that I am sad to have to break this news. Your work will not go unnoticed, each of you has provided an invaluable service and we are all grateful. Do not think that this action shows any reflection on the exceptional quality of your individual work!"

This was like a military operation, yet no one in the room knew I didn't work for their firm!

So, we went to "lunch," at around 10:15am. where I was able to visit with 3, or 4 of the lesser engineers, without oversight from their 'head honchos.' I played it really cool considering my total ignorance. Each of them were furious. I said things like -"Shame we have to dis-band, I was looking forward to being here for at least a few months." "What do you suppose we've done wrong?" ...Each in turn revealed:

"The fact is, we all know that the buildings can't stand safely for over 40 to 60 years. It's not the sub-soil, that's granite. They must have received the completed demolition report, which we all knew to expect. It was supposed to be finished months ago. Clearly it looks bad. Well, I'm sure we all know the real implication- that the owners can't get their money back. That's what we all learned today. -Thanks _X_, f*** you!"

I asked: -"Why, what do you mean?"

It will cost $____ Billion to erect the two scaffolds to surround both buildings, that's the only known way to take these baby's down. We'll literally have to re-build them, then un-build them, twice! Now it's obvious, bottom-line is that the developer will have to sell them soon, or take a serious bath. (I forget the actual figure)

-"Why are they worried now? They still seem really stable architecturally."

They are much too big. It's a piece-by-piece problem. They simply can't be imploded, we know of no other way. Why do you think they hired me for 10 years to find other solutions? I'm not a structural specialist, just an architect!

- "I thought Barry said you guys were about to find a solution."

(I could see that was the wrong thing to say.) A slight look of concern spread over their faces, until I said-"What's a few more Flying Buttresses going to cost?" It was a lame jab, but they bought it and everyone relaxed as I pretended to be contemplating my next job interview.

I learned that 'none of them were allowed to be holding other jobs,' as long as they held these 'titles,' a contract-stipulation had occurred at least 4 years prior. They all griped about the "pathetic" lunch; "This is horrible, I can't eat here!" No one was very relaxed. The more I learned, the more scared I was as I listened for more fascinating inside news.

-Finally, pushing my luck, I prodded again: "So tell me about the electrolytic issues."

Everyone went quiet, but realised they were in deep. They began a patent narritive which was clearly not about to go anywhere, since I think they knew that I knew as much as each of them about the composition and arrangements of these metals. I had effectively blown my cover.

Suddenly, just short of our hour, a man came to escort us back to their desks which had been mostly riffled through, or completely boxed and removed.

"Again, son, tell me who you are?" -One of the senior associates asked. "You guys walk ahead, he said, using firm body-lauguage to physically indicate that he would be in a position to restrain me at any time.

"I'm T.S. Gordon the official photographer. They were tired of paying Stoller." "Who's Stoller, I only know of McGrath?" "Are you saying you are not with Mr. McGrath's firm?"

I said; "Ezra Stoller, the world's greatest at shooting tall buildings. Haven't you seen all the great shots up at Emery Roth? McGrath has shot what, 6 or 8 great photos in 4 years!," (-I sarcastically mused, until I began to feel that he might arrest me. By the way, Norman's shot's were great too, but I felt I had to assert a strong opinion.)

"You go by; Tom, Thomas, or T.S.?" -He asked, looking again at my drivers license.

"TS- I was called in to cover the site, not just the buildings. I didn't even need to come in here again for my assignment!" - I said, carefully back-stepping, like I could find my way to the elevator. He grabbed my arm and we proceeded rapidly through the corridors behind the others. "No, you were called in because everyone had to sign off on their part in this entire assignment. You say you work for Barry__ who?"

I responded with the proper name and added, "He's the one that cuts my checks and I give him ALL the film." (An exaggeration, but I knew Barry was a former project manager and he would be at lunch if they tried to call.)

"You are not to tell anyone about your employment here, ever!" -he said.

"Wait here by the window, all of you with outside affiliations." A couple of guys took their seats by the North window, but I was nervous and I stood with my back to them as I starred down on the un-finished looking iron-work of building #7, which had just been 'topped-out' with a ceremony the day before.

"What are you studying?" someone asked. "I can't believe that building is so tall and skinny," and I really couldn't. ( I had toured #7, so I was quite curious about this viewing angle.) He stood up, evidently really angry, and said quite unpleasantly; "Yeah good old #7, the building that never should have been built!"

The room went silent. His tone was immediately received as a threat by the boss. He separated the three of us and called my contact at Emery-Roth who then acknowledged that I was hired to shoot the building. Neither discussed any details, so I was off the hook in a way. He dismissed me and said I was not to talk to any of the other participants on the way out, not ever again. An armed guard escorted me down to the street.

Within a few days I called Ezra Stoller, in White Plains, who, speaking about WTC, innocently revealed that he; "Wasn't allowed to shoot any more pictures of it." That was a very funny thing to hear him say. No one ever "doesn't allow" a photographer to get a better shot. I didn't say what had happened to me, only that it was very exciting for me to get to follow in his shoes. I thanked him for the friendly phone visit and promised to show him the prints if I got any really great shots. He was very polite and understood my admiration.


Based on a true life experience I had at the World Trade Center, I offer this document now, to those who may be searching for " key potential motives" behind the actions that led to the 9/11 attacks. I do not intend to imply that any of the parties that I will mention here were directly involved in the coordinated effort to destroy the building.

However, it is clearer to me, over time, that this information would have provided a pre-eminent, and utterly untraceable 'blue-print' to the group that finally engineered the 9/11 attack.

This document was originally released in 2003, and was ammended for accuracy, on: 1/18/2004.

This information is entirely true and this is its first public release. My explanation does not intend to add substantially in any way to the factual information that is contained in the actual documentation that I have described.-TSG

Supporting Facts, Assumptions and Curious Questions:

I would speculate that in 1989 through 1993, as the downtown real estate market was falling, there were perhaps reasons to suspect that the WTC owners might have contemplated the first bombing. After Battery Park attracted their biggest tenants, the property quickly lost it's viability. (At the time, Geoff Parker reported that a friend of his was given a whole floor in the South tower to use as a drumming studio, for free!) By 1996, the internet had decentralized the financial industry, further diminishing the lease/return opportunities of this property. ( I don't know the actual math, maybe it was going up again.)

The building cost about $1.5B to build and was worth about $4. to 5.B at its peak. But, it would have cost about $20B to un-build it in 2010 dollars, or as it neared its 1/2 'safe' life. Obviously it HAD to be imploded and there was never going to be a 'break-even' point for the owners.

The first attempted attack was evidently planned to kill all of us, or at least scatter the group's paperwork. Building #7 was actually a protective scaffold, designed to catch the debris as the North building fell. Why did they plan it so only this building would fall, particularly northward? Would they receive the insurance then appeal for a government bail-out to de-construct the main tower, sometime later?

Minoru Yamasaki was working for the Saudi's when he took on this project. After its completion in 1973, he returned to Saudi Arabia to consult on other projects. Eventually, in 1986, he did the Saudi Financial Center. Noteworthy, if I remember, because of its triangular super-rigid looking tower, also attributed to S.O.M. In interviews he appears to be a gracious and spiritually honest man. We certainly felt his pain when he was interviewed on TV.

Minoru befriended Richard Roth Sr., while working for Brown & Root in Chicago. Roth was noted for his contribution on the "Columbia Exposition" Project. They shared many arts & crafts stylistic attitudes. Richard Roth Jr. was in charge of his dad's firm when he retired. He is friends with lots of conservatives. (Carnegie Mellon group, like his dad.) He is friends with Saul Steinberg, Stephen Roth, Jeffrey Levine, lots of famous Jewish folks with dubious Israeli connections.

When the building was sold to Silversteen, Stephen Roth, (with Vernado Realty) worked to take the bid as high as possible, offering $750,M more than the next lower bidder. Did he even have the money? Two months before the official auction, he withdrew the ridiculous bid. Could this have been a mistake on his part?

Isn't this the same Stephen Roth who runs the "Anti-defamation League" in Israel. They track all persons who threaten the sovereignty of Israel. Interestingly enough it was established in 1991! Suddenly, after that, there were lots of reported 'neo-nazi' groups springing up in Germany and the UK. His group gave rise to the importance of stopping these 'Right- wing terrorists' at all costs, and he may serve as the eyes and ears for the CIA, or Massoud. Either way, he's got to be an insider with Sharon.

Tom-Scott Gordon
Architectural Photographer/currently A/V Systems Integrator

From Tom-Scott Gordon

The President of VICE
1. Cheney's money bonanza, selling stock, he knew would drop because of Asbestos ridden firm he as CEO he merged.
2. Halliburton influences Congressional bill to , to limit asbestos liability.
3. The WTC plagued by too high a cost to remove asbestos, bought by Larry Silverstein, who later said he pulled building 7
4. Mortage holder of WTC, Peter Peterson, Council of Foreign Relations Chairman, Blackstone Group, Federal Reserve Chairman in New York
Ground Zero hero Detective James Zadroga died young, - tan autopsy found his fatal illness was "directly related" to his work at the disaster site.
NY Lawmakers Respond To Ground Zero Autopsy
WASHINGTON (1010 WINS) -- A new autopsy attributing a 34-year-old New York police detective's death this year to exposure to toxic Sept. 11 dust should spur the government to do more for sick ground zero workers, lawmakers said Wednesday.
7.  http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/nation/14349501.htm
Health commissioner doubts that Sept. 11 toxins killed detective
New York Daily News
The Dective, James Zagruda left behind a four year old daughter, and medical bills, his parents said, and if his death can be changed to an in the line of duty death, at least his daughter could get his pension until she turns 19.

8. The White House released the income tax statements, Cheney will get a refund nearing 2 million dollars.  http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12318056/

Throw the Globalists Out !

Is the below blurb saying Cheney, knowingly decided to merge Halliburton and Dresser (with severe asbestos liability), then sold his
Halliburton stock prior to stock losing 75% in value
(due to decisions Cheney made). Although Cheney HAD to sell the stock when he did (join
W. on the ticket), the bad financial information was not made public until after he sold his
stock. (Unethical, potentially illegal.) Cheney making millions from sale of Halliburton stock prior to stock losing 75% in value

link to www.democraticunderground.com

HALLIBURTON, THE FILE, updated Oct., 2002
Cheney was Chairman and CEO of Halliburton October 1,1995-August 16, 2000. Cheney's tenure at Halliburton was a disaster. He made the decision for Halliburton to merge with Dresser Industries (for $8 billion dollars), thereby acquiring Dresser's asbestos liability, which had been drastically underestimated. Cheney had miscalculated the financial devastation of acquiring these claims and the massive losses were off-set on paper by fraudulent accounting procedures (see area #1), and not fully revealed until Cheney had sold his stock in Aug. 2002 (see area #5).
This file contains the following sections, each section divided by double asterisked-lines (making it easy to scroll to the desired section. The first three sections are in the initial post, then the next three in the Reply post, and the last two in the final Replay post:

1. Halliburton's audits which overstated revenues. I.e., creative bookkeeping. (Potentially
2. Halliburton selling Oil Equipment which can be used for development of nuclear weapons
to Libya and Iraq during U.S. sanctions. (Illegal.)
3. Halliburton selling Oil Equipment to Libya and Iraq through subsidiaries after sanctions and
profiting from Iranian Oil..
(Immoral, possibly illegal.)
4. Cheney becoming CEO of a company which he had rewarded as Secretary of Defense and
granting large contracts to Halliburton after becoming Vice President. I.e., the revolving
door of power and money and power and. . . . (Conflicts of interest. Unethical.)
5. Cheney making millions from sale of Halliburton stock prior to stock losing 75% in value
(due to decisions Cheney made). Although Cheney HAD to sell the stock when he did (join
W. on the ticket), the bad financial information was not made public until after he sold his
stock. (Unethical, potentially illegal.)
6. Halliburton overbilled government. (Illegal.)
7. Halliburton's contributions to co-sponsors of a House and Senate bill, labeled "highly
controversial" by many, to limit asbestos liability.

Future United States president George H. W. Bush worked for the company in several positions after the war. His father, Prescott Bush, had been a W. A. Harriman and Company executive who had been involved in the conversion of Dresser to a public company, and he served on the board of directors for twenty-two years.
So Cheney Profits from insider knowledge, makes millions selling his stock, before profits drop nearly 80%, then leaves as CEO August 15, 2000, to run for President of VICE.

Halliburton's contributions to co-sponsors of a House and Senate bill, labeled "highly
controversial" by many, to limit asbestos liability.

>  http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/04/337158.shtml
On 9/11: Was the Asbestos-Laced World Trade Center "Disposable"?
author: rese
I read that Scholars for 911 truth are meeting today in Virginia, and subject is SCHOLARS AFFIRM CHENEY COMPLICITY IN 9/11. "The experts base their conclusion on testimony presented to the 9/11 Commission by U.S. Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta on May 23, 2003, which was omitted from its final report, and on related events at the Pentagon.

Members of the society will present their findings during a press conference to be held at 1 PM on Tuesday at the United States Courthouse in Alexandria, VA, the location of a trial to determine whether Moussaoui, who is called "the 20th hijacker", should serve a life term or receive the death sentence.

"Mineta's testimony is devastating," observed James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., McKnight Professor at the University of Minnesota. Fetzer is the founder and co-chair of the scholars' society, which recently joined with Judicial Watch in calling for release of documents, films and videos, and physical evidence withheld from the public by the administration. "It pulls the plug on the Commission's contention there was no advance warning that the Pentagon was going to be hit."

According to Secretary Mineta's testimony, which is in the public domain, when he (Mineta) arrived at an underground bunker at the White House (known as the Presidential Emergency Operations Center), the Vice President was in charge. "During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon", he stated, "there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, 'The plane is 50 miles out.' 'The plane is 30 miles out.'

"And when it got down to, 'The plane is 10 miles out,'" Mineta continued, "the young man also said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders still stand?' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, 'Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'" One way to construe these remarks could be that the orders were to shoot down the plane.

The scholars suggest that that is an implausible interpretation. The Pentagon, they observe, may be the most heavily defended building in the world. If the orders had been to "shoot it down," then no doubt it would have been shot down. Moreover, there would have been no apparent reason for the young man to have expressed concern over whether or not "the orders still stand." Shooting it down, under the circumstances, would have been the thing to do.

"The only reasonable interpretation of the orders," Fetzer observed, "is that the incoming aircraft should not be shot down, which would have been an obvious source of anxiety for an aide. Since it contradicts the official story about the Pentagon," he added, "it had to be suppressed and was not even included in The 9/11 Commission Report." And other scholars, including Professor David Ray Griffin of Claremont Graduate University, have drawn the same conclusion.

Philip J. Berg, Esq., Former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania and a past candidate for Governor, Lt. Governor, and U.S. Senate from Pennsylvania, who is a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, added, "Those who made it happen were obviously in the position to know that it was going to happen and therefore could have sounded a warning alarm. The case against Cheney is more powerful than the case against Moussaoui. No one is more culpable than the perpetrators. If Moussaoui deserves the death penalty, what does our Vice President deserve?"
See Scholars for 911 Truth at

Can't wait to hear about Iran and Eathquakes!
But you missed this story!
Bush is insisting on amnesty, because he wants his brother, Jeff, Spanish speaking , because he married a South American gal, and hid documents about the terrorist flight training schools, and CIA drug operations, to run for Prez 2008, who will get all these illegals, Spanish speaking, CATHOLIC, contorolled by Jesuits to vote for the most criminal family in history.

Judicial watch's Video of attack on Pentagon

What part of "if the American people had ever known the truth of what we Bush's have done to this nation, we would be chased down the streets and lynched" don't you understand?

Of course, would anyone, Mr. Snow, dare comment about Mr. Ex President Bush's statement
Famous Quote of George Bush Senior:" You can fool some of the people all the time, and these are the ones you want to concentrate on"
I also remember he said "Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."

George Bush Senior speaking in an interview with
Sarah McClendon in December 1992

Even conservative website www.worldnetdaily.com published an article today saying round up all the alligators in Florida, transport them on the flooded New Orleans busses and dump them in the Rio Grande!

Peope are starting to wake up to the truth! He's insisting on amnesty, because he wants his brother, Jeff to run, who will get all these illegals to vote for the most criminal family in history.

Judicial watch's Video of attack on Pentagon



Stop illegal invasion: Put gators on border

Posted: May 19, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

The top stories in America this week are simply astounding."

This is not a bad idea! As it is the corporations are scewing American workers by employing Mexicans for less,outsourcing jobs to cheaper countries, and Bush won't enforce the laws and fine them heavily, he allowed them to pour into the border for 5 years and didn't follow the 911 Commission recomendations to seal the borders, and now he wants to spend more of your tax money on corporatly built fences, drones , etc. Reward the corporations for doing the illegal!!!

Once the gators are in the Rio Grande let him go fishing there!

Missing Trillions
Rumsfeld Buries Admission of Missing 2+ Trillion Dollars in 9/10/01 Press Conference

On September 10, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for. Rumsfeld stated: "According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions."

Such a disclosure normally would have sparked a huge scandal. However, the commencement of the attack on New York City and Washington in the morning would assure that the story remained buried. To the trillions already missing from the coffers, an obedient Congress terrorized by anthrax attacks would add billions more in appropriations to fight the "War on Terror."

The Comptroller of the Pentagon at the time of the attack was Dov Zakheim, who was appointed in May of 2001. Before becoming the Pentagon's money-manager, he was an executive at System Planning Corporation, a defense contractor specializing in electronic warfare technologies including remote-controlled aircraft systems. Zakheim is a member of the Project for a New American Century and participated in the creation of its 2000 position paper Rebuilding America's Defenses which called for "a New Pearl Harbor."


Dov Zakheim stole $2 TRILLION from you.

His company (Sysplan) made the technology (Flight Termination System) that was utilized on 9/11 to guide planes to their targets.

Flight 77 was shadowed (within just a few feet) on 9/11 enroute to the Pentagon by a Raytheon A-3 Skywarrior powered by a Thiokol motor and equipped with bombs.

When you see the new video of the Pentagon attack - the white smoke is from the Thiokol motor of the A-3. NO 757 hit the Pentagon. Period.

AA flight 77 crashed short of the Pentagon in Virginia and was quietly cleaned up. The A-3 continued the mission and THAT is what you see slamming into the Pentagon.

Nearly EVERYONE in the Pentagon and the White House and the Congress know this to be true.

They all know that 9/11 was an inside job.

All of them.

So does the media.
By: plunger on May 19, 2006 at 10:18pm
Flag: [abusive] [best of]


The type of aircraft and engines used to attack the Pentagon.

This shows the Raytheon connection to 9/11.



It was this collaborative approach that led Jon and I to conclude that no 757 hit the Pentagon so we looked for alternatives. The only plane that made sense was either a 737 or an A3 Skywarrior, both of which can use the same types of jet engines up to a point.

The wing span of most 737 jets fall into the range of between 93.0 ft and 112.6 ft which is still 19 feet to 38 feet of wing that cannot be accounted for in impacting the face of the Pentagon before it mysteriously disappeared. When the absence of surface impacts and the size of a 737 including height of the tail are weighed, it is probable that a smaller plane was used to affect the attack on the Pentagon.

I defy anyone to find an A3 Skywarrior in the hands of any Arab terrorist on 9-11 or any other day. There are only three sources of those jets: 1.) a few (3 to 6) remaining in USAF inventory; or 2.) Davis Monthan AFB where many jets are stored due to lack of humidity; or 3.) the fleet of 12-15 once owned by Hughes and now controlled by Raytheon after that corporation acquired Hughes.

Jon Carlson and I are convinced that the plane used to attack the Pentagon is an old USAF / Navy plane designated as the A3 Skywarrior.

The wingspan of an A3 is 74 feet and in the Navy version the wings were designed to fold up for storage on an aircraft carrier (visible on the drawing above). At a distance, painted like an American Airlines plane, this plane would easily be mistaken for a 737, 757, 767 type of aircraft because the two engines hang under the wing but are of far smaller dimensions than the 9 foot diameter jets on a 757 that not only hang under the wing but also hang lower than the bottom of the fuselage.

That is an important point because there were no marks on the Pentagon lawn of those two jet engines dragging the ground and they would have based on how low the Pentagon was hit. Said another way, forget about the fuselage dragging on the ground. The engines of a 757 would have been plowing the Pentagon lawn but that did not happen.

The wingspan of a 757 is 124 feet 10 inches. The width of the overall opening, even what is visible as possible wing marks slamming into the face of the building is closer to 74 feet than it is 124 feet 10 inches. In short, there is 50 feet missing to substantiate the Official Lie put out by Washington, DC as to what hit the Pentagon. Said another way, there is 25 feet on each side of the centerline of the strike point (that 14-16 foot hole left in the side of the Pentagon) that left no evidence of a wider wing span 757 hitting the building.

They also cannot (or more appropriately will not) explain what happened to the two 9 foot diameter engines that mysteriously disappeared. Some official government sources claim that the fire was so hot it melted the engines to nothing, yet they claim they found DNA of the passengers. That math does not compute, or the science either.

I remember the first conversation I had with Karen Kwiatkowski, a retired Lieutenant Colonel who was in the Pentagon that day. She is the lady that went public about the Office of Special Plans where they were falsifying the intelligence regarding Iraq. She vividly remembers being downstairs and around the corner in about 10 minutes to help get people out and the FBI agents were at the CITGO station confiscating the video tapes of what hit the Pentagon.

Other eyewitnesses have stated that they smelled explosives such as cordite, not burning jet fuel. Those were military witnesses that know that exploded ordnance smells like.

What little video evidence there is does show a white trail of smoke before the Pentagon explosion. Jet fuel burns dark at sea level and jets do not leave white contrails at sea level. What does leave a white trail of smoke at all elevations is the solid fuel of a rocket, Thiokol in most rockets being the type of solid fuel.
By: plunger on May 19, 2006 at 10:21pm
Flag: [abusive] [best of]

Feeling confident that all plans were on track for moving aggressively in the world, the Bush Administration in September of 2002 published the "National Security Strategy of the United States of America." The official policy of the U.S. government, as proudly proclaimed in this major document, is virtually identical to the policy proposals in the various white papers of the Project for the New American Century and others like it over the past decade.

Chief among them are: 1) the policy of "pre-emptive" war -- i.e., whenever the U.S. thinks a country may be amassing too much power and/or could provide some sort of competition in the "benevolent hegemony" region, it can be attacked, without provocation. (A later corollary would rethink the country's atomic policy: nuclear weapons would no longer be considered defensive, but could be used offensively in support of political/economic ends; so-called "mini-nukes" could be employed in these regional wars.) 2) international treaties and opinion will be ignored whenever they are not seen to serve U.S. imperial goals. 3) The new policies "will require bases and stations within and beyond Western Europe and Northeast Asia."

In short, the Bush Administration seems to see the U.S., admiringly, as a New Rome, an empire with its foreign legions (and threat of "shock&awe" attacks, including with nuclear weapons) keeping the outlying colonies, and potential competitors, in line. Those who aren't fully in accord with these goals better get out of the way; "you're either with us or against us."

By: plunger on May 19, 2006 at 10:23pm
Flag: [abusive] [best of]

According to the US Government's own website which is specifically designed to debunk conspiracy theories:


With regard to the World Trade Center attacks, Mr. Meyssan ignores or dismisses the facts that:


"Boeing commercial aircraft can not be remotely controlled"

This assertion is false.

Dov Zakheim was the Pentagon's comptroller and CFO during 9/11. Over $3 trillion is unaccounted for during his tenure. He was (is?) Corporate VP at System Planning Corporation, a major player in the "Homeland Security" industry. One of the products that SysPlan sells is the Command Transmitter System, a remote control system for planes, boats, missiles and other vehicles2 . It's highly customable and configurable to interface with an almost limitless number of vehicle types.

The CTS is a tunable UHF FM transmitter designed for ground use in controlling guided missiles, pilotless aircraft and pilotless boats.

Many takeoff and lending tests were performed using this system on a commercial size Boeing aircraft under the supervision of Raytheon in the days prior to 9/11.

If the pilot is not in direct control and another mechanism is controlling (not just receiving passive signals or sensing) the craft, especially from GPS, it is effectively 'remotely' controlled. The link between ground crews, GPS and aircraft have been established. It's not a cruise control and it's not a radio controlled toy car. We're talking FULL avionics AND navigation from take-off to touch down controlled and guided by a known and documented satellite link. "A fully integrated flight management computer system (FMCS) provides for automatic guidance and control of the 757-200 from immediately after takeoff to final approach and landing. Linking together digital processors controlling navigation, guidance and engine thrust, the flight management system assures that the aircraft flies the most efficient route and flight profile for reduced fuel consumption, flight time and crew workload. The precision of global positioning satellite (GPS) system navigation, automated air traffic control functions, and advanced guidance and communications features are now available as part of the new Future Air Navigation System (FANS) flight management computer." This technology could effectively PREVENT the hijack of aircraft. Any deviation from the course would trigger the system and someone would know about it. We're working to verify if American Airlines does have this technology installed in any of its fleet. Suppose they do have this technology installed... Why not key in a coordinate or code to have a hijacked aircraft automatically land at a predesignated, properly prepared airfield prepped for such eventualities. I can only assume that our "planners" do indeed think in terms of hostile contingencies and have this scenario worked out. This all begs the questions: why wasn't this critical technology used, or was it abused?

By: plunger on May 19, 2006 at 10:23pm
Flag: [abusive] [best of]


Americans (too many) do not know that Raytheon executives were killed on 9-11, or at least wound up permanently missing, which may be a more accurate way of saying it. It is who wound up missing that is most interesting.

This is an excerpt of the email we received and is information that we knew as of the issuance of the flight manifests for all four of the planes allegedly involved in 9-11:

Subject: Raytheon and 9/11

OK, I'm not gonna say anything here, except to let you read the evidence and then you can tell me what you think. (These are people who supposedly died on 9/11.) Mike

Raytheon and 9/11

2001-09-11 Stanley Hall Raytheon Director of Electronic warfare program management. Raytheon did the retrofit of the A-3 that hit the Pentagon, where Bush claimed Flight 77 hit it. Disappeared on American airlines Flight 77, the one that supposedly hit the Pentagon but did not.

2001-09-11 Peter Gay Raytheon VP of Electronic Systems on special assignment at the El Segundo, CA division office where the Global Hawk UAV remote control system is made. Raytheon did the retrofit of the A-3 that hit the Pentagon, where Bush claimed Flight 77 hit it. Disappeared on American airlines Flight 11, the one that supposedly hit the North World Trade Tower I.

2001-09-11 Kenneth Waldie Raytheon Senior Quality Control for Electronic Systems. Raytheon did the retrofit of the A-3 that hit the Pentagon, where Bush claimed Flight 77 hit it. Disappeared on American airlines Flight 11, the one that supposedly hit the North World Trade Tower I.

2001-09-11 David Kovalcin Raytheon Senior Mechanical Engineer for Electronic Systems. Raytheon did the retrofit of the A-3 that hit the Pentagon, where Bush claimed Flight 77 hit it. Disappeared on American airlines Flight 11, the one that supposedly hit the North World Trade Tower I.

2001-09-11 Herbert Homer Raytheon Corporate Executive working with the Department of Defense. Raytheon did the retrofit of the A-3 that hit the Pentagon, where Bush claimed Flight 77 hit it. Disappeared on United airlines Flight 175, the one that supposedly hit the South World Trade Tower II.

These are not only the type of people but they are the people that would be assigned to UAV type projects involving Mode 4 and Mode 5 upgrades. Why would they be in Boston and those planes coming from that direction and from north of Manhattan Island?

That 16 foot tunnel through three rings of the Pentagon is only made by a directional blast weapon. Rumsfeld has even slipped up and mentioned the missile that hit the Pentagon.

Some have seen the Pentagon parking lot camera video and the white trail of smoke. Jets do now leave white trails of smoke at sea level, but Thiokol powered AGMs do, at all attitudes.

A Real 9-11 Commission should have certain Hughes and Raytheon parties summoned for questioning, as well as those that follow:
By: plunger on May 19, 2006 at 10:24pm

Seated behind Mohammad Atta on 9/11 was an Israeli Mossad agent, Daniel Lewin.




Atta was sitting in seat 8D. In front of him were the two brothers, Wael and Walid Al-Shihri. Behind him was his comrade in his final days, 'Abd Al-'Aziz Al-'Omari. To Al-'Omari's left was the Israeli Mossad agent, Daniel Lewin, and right behind him, the man who would kill him, Sattam Al-Suqami.

In those exact moments, a group of Mossad agents were waiting in Manhattan for the first plane. They had surveillance and filming equipment with them. Meanwhile, F-15 planes were on high alert in Otis air base, 150 miles away, not knowing in which direction to fly.

It is noteworthy that in those moments, the Mossad agents here, according to eye-witnesses, were dancing and cheering in front of the WTC. The Israelis were arrested in New York. Later, they were moved to Washington, and from there to Israel, and the report was quickly suppressed.





By: plunger on May 19, 2006 at 10:26pm
Flag: [abusive] [best of]

Raytheon is missing at least one if not two A-3 Skywarriors from its inventory.

Ask them where they went.
By: plunger on May 19, 2006 at 10:27pm


C-SPAN Interview April 2, 2006
Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski
U.S. Air Force, 1983-2003


LAMB: You wrote one of the things that we don't often hear from inside, that Bill Luti referred to the Chief of Central Command, Anthony Zinni, as a traitor.

KWIATKOSKI: Former Chief of Central Command Anthony Zinni, Tommy Frank's predecessor. Yes, he did, and right in front of the refrigerator that sat two feet from my desk.

There was a huge contempt, and Bill Luti is not the only one. But, among the neo-conservatives in and out of the Pentagon and, of course, you can read their writings even at the time, a huge sense of collective derision, collective contempt for people that were like Anthony Zinni, people that were saying, "We need to sit down and think about what we're saying. We need to see how this fits in with America's national security interests. We need to be sure that what we're saying about Iraq's capability, Iraq's connection to terrorism, and anybody else's capability in connection to terrorism, we need to be sure that what we say is checked out."
By: plunger on May 19, 2006 at 10:28pm
Flag: [abusive] [best of]

Why was former CIA Director Porter Goss and Sen. Graham having breakfast with the Pakistani ISI Spychief, the money man who wired Mohammed Atta $100,000 on the morning of 9/11????

Figure that one out and you find out who really did 9/11, and not the patsies the government marches out for public consumption.

By: rebelpatriot on May 05, 2006 at 11:46pm

The largest conspiracy in the world can be brought to its knees by the largest supercomputer ever conceived, powered by unending, relentless human determination to get to the truth.

That supercomputer is called the Internet, POWERED BY PATRIOTS, and the thousands of dots that make up the BIG LIE are all being connected.


What part will you play?

Don't be caught criticizing the cybersluths when the crime is solved.

Pick a dot, and connect it to another. Then pick another, and connect it to the first two.

And so on, and so on, and so on.

The power is in your hands.

The only thing more outrageous the Conspiracy Theory to explain all that has unfolded since 9/11 is Coincidence Theory.

What are the odds that all of this is coincidental given the plan that was laid out years earlier?

Use your heads.

The ONLY thing that can possibly explain the collapse of building 7 is
high explosives. Period. End Of Story.

That the building collapsed within one hour of Silverstein's voice command
to demolish the building is evidence enough.

Like a loose thread on a cheap suit, pull at the obvious lie, and
soon the entire suit starts to unravel, as story after story falls

IT IS TRUE that Building 7 was brought down with explosives.

IT IS TRUE that it takes a couple weeks to wire a building for a controlled demo.

IT IS TRUE that this implies FOREKNOWLEDGE OF AN EVENT to justify the deed.

If all of this is true, then how could you possibly conclude that the owner of
Building 7 would not have wired his other buildings in a similar way?

Logical, right?

Keep pulling that thread...

There is no Zarkawi

There is no Bin Laden

What are you, conspiracy theorists?

Wake up.

They're gaming you.

19 hijackers flew suicide missions on 9/11.

1/3 of them are still alive.

What does it mean?

Answer the question.


Explain it.

If this, then this...

If this, then this...

and so on...

and so on...

and so on...

If the Mossad Agents were celebrating on 9/11, then what?

and so on...

and so on...

and so on...

Let's start out with a recap of some highly disturbing events in this country, as reported by a mainstream newspaper on the United States in August of 2005:


Now can you help me out with a plausible explanation for this:


And this official DEA report:


On 9/11:

The five men -- Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari and Yaron Shmuel -- were arrested eight hours after the attacks by the Bergen County, N.J., police while driving in an Urban Moving Systems van.

The Forward, a respected Jewish newspaper in New York, reported the FBI concluded that two of the men were Israeli intelligence operatives.

Vince Cannistraro, a former chief of operations for counterterrorism with the CIA who is now a consultant for ABCNEWS, said federal authorities' interest in the case was heightened when some of the men's names were found in a search of a national intelligence database.

Israeli Intelligence Connection?

According to Cannistraro, many people in the U.S. intelligence community believed that some of the men arrested were working for Israeli intelligence. Cannistraro said there was speculation as to whether Urban Moving had been "set up or exploited for the purpose of launching an intelligence operation against radical Islamists in the area, particularly in the New Jersey-New York area."

According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:

"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem."

The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture.

The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:

American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported.

TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of explosives (13).

What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20, the New York Post, and the New Jersey Bergen Record all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.

But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva), and Yediot America, all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.

It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing.

It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad agents. They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days.

Several of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home.

Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."

How did they know there would be an event to document on 9/11?

It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents

"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

The men all underwent at least two polygraph tests each, the lawyer added. He said one of the Israelis took the test seven times, a very unusual total according to several polygraph experts interviewed by the Forward. All failed their tests.



By: plunger on May 19, 2006 at 10:30pm

Will You be the next TARGET of our own corrupted Government?
by rese and posters Monday, May. 08, 2006 at 8:25 AM

Comedian Colbert's jokes were based on our reality. Ask yourself who profited from 911? Did fundamental fanatical Muslims actually make their countries safer by 911? No. Research shows the money trail leads to the true perpetuators of 911.

Has Comedian Colbert, by ridiculing Bush in his face,stopped nuclear War? Part 2
by rese Thursday, May. 04, 2006 at 9:25 PM

Comedian Colbert RIDICULED President Bush in his face at The Correspondents Roast. Yet only "Clone" Bush was blasted on the mainstream media. Help spread this around, and show it to those who you hold dear. They've censored the original link.

Full screen Colbert:


Porter Goss Meets with Pres. Bush & Remarks on Resigning as CIA Dir. (5/05/2006)
White House Press Sec. Scott McClellan's Last Press Briefing (5/5/2006)
Comedian Stephen Colbert at White House Correspondents' Dinner (4/29/2006)
President Bush & "Clone" at White House Correspondents' Dinner (4/29/2006)
Entire White House Correspondents' Dinner
Full screen version of Colbert's pergormance, But BLURRED PRESIDEN'T FACE


Has Comedian Colbert, by ridiculing Bush in his face,stopped nuclear War?

Colbert's performance was superb, demonstrating Bush's performance as below marginal.

Yesterday, President Bush said his biggest accomplishment of his Presidency was reeling in a 7.5 pound perch:  link to today.reuters.co.uk

Sadly most of America doesn't know about this because most Americans are too busy just working, trying to make ends meet, and rely on TV Media news.

TV media news are owned by the very same corporations in alliance with the military, profiting from their preplanned wars with Afghanistan and Iraq.

Well planned out by PNAC and Cheney way before 911 they wrote in Rebuilding America's Defenses, the Need for a New Pearl Harbor then they made it happen. The same people behind J.F.K's assassination hung on behind the scenes, and succeeded in assassinating 3000 citizens on 911.
See  link to www.ctwilcox.com click on Posada.
Most of this article is devouted to explaining why they made it happen.

It is criminal that there's even discussion of talk by the VICE president of nuking Iran. How does he know Iran does not have alliances with Nuclear China, Pakistan and North Korea?
How dare he set off WW III and a resulting nuclear winter? We had mutual detterence in the past and we can live with mutual detterence now. But nuclear power plants have not been so lucky!

 http://www.kiddofspeed.com/chernobyl-revisited/chapter1.html The effects of Chernobyl as shown in photos a girl took while riding on her motor bike, and at Portland indymedia, this artile, Nuclear energy is a never-ending nightmare, Chernobyl in Ukraine still killing on and on..."Only a very small amount of the radiation inside of there had so far actually escaped. More then 90% is still under sarcophagus. I heard with all the concrete they put down, the construction became heavy. Some day it may fall down, get in subterranean waters and leave Europe with no water."

Not only was the WTC full of asbestos it had galvanized aluminum making it a financial albatross. To destroy it for the insurance would be very profitable! Larry Silverstein admitted pulling building 7 two years after on a PBS special. See
On 9/11: Was the Asbestos-Laced World Trade Center "Disposable"?
This article with comments and discussion "Treason" shows the WTC was targeted for insurance.
Federal government Corruption Exposed
Evidence for Treason
That story about Halliburton acquiring the asbestos liabilities of Dresser Industries raises an interesting point...

Cheney KNEW that Dresser had the most massive liability issue on planet earth (he had to have known) yet decided to pay good money to bring Dresser's problems under Halliburton's tent.

This raises the question...who were the largest shareholders of Dresser - in need of a lifeboat to save their own personal bacon? Anyone named Bush? Anyone named Carlyle?

The deal went like this:

Cheney agrees for Halliburton to take on the Dresser asbestos liability.

It is determined that Bush and Cheney will be (so)elected, and that the PNAC plan will be implemented - using 9/11 as the essential pretext.

Ken Lay plays his role using his Enron smoke and mirrors tactics to create a faux energy crisis in California, causing the public to demand an energy-savvy administration be elected.

With the asbestos liability and other matters hanging in the balance, the election of 2000 simply had to be rigged in order for the plan to go in to effect.
(Recall the stopping of the Votes in Jab Bush's Florida, by Delay's henchmen, and subsequent forwarding election to Supreme Court)

Following the appointment of Bush and Cheney, the secret energy planning meeting established which oil companies would reap the rewards of the pending invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran.

The timing and the pretext were predetermined, and 9/11 was greenlighted for 9/11/2001. Cheney outsourced the implementation to Mossad, and ran the show from his bunker on D Day under the cover of preplanned drills simulating the exact attack that was proscribed, with NORAD as coconspirator. At least 50 administration officials and countless foreign agents were in on it.

Once the entire charade was concluded, the Administration generally, and Cheney specifically, had every reason in the world to blame Iraq.

The Afghanistan mission could not provide Halliburton with enough revenue to offset the massive asbestos liability claim. Iraq and Iran are essential wars in order to provide cover for the infusion of the billion of TAX DOLLARS necessary to both profit Halliburton for its actual work AND cover the massive asbestos liability claims.

Now you know why Halliburton was awarded the contracts without the need to bid for them. This was all prearranged.

NOTE: Private enterprise pushed its legal/financial obligations onto tax payers using war as the excuse.

The asbestos liability claims of Dresser Industries were ultimately paid by you and me, and our troops in the field, all to ensure that the investors in Dresser didn't take the multibillion dollar loss.

Just one piece of a very large chessboard.

Hang them for TREASON.
By: plunger

GW included the issue in his State of the Union speech in 2005.

"To make our economy stronger and more competitive, America must reward, not punish, the efforts and dreams of entrepreneurs. Small business is the path of advancement, especially for women and minorities, so we must free small businesses from needless regulation and protect honest job-creators from junk lawsuits. (Applause.) Justice is distorted, and our economy is held back by irresponsible class-actions and frivolous asbestos claims -- and I urge Congress to pass legal reforms this year."

Famous Quote of George Bush Senior:" You can fool some of the people all the time, and these are the ones you want to concentrate on"
I also remember he said "Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."

George Bush Senior speaking in an interview with
Sarah McClendon in December 1992

most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our Number one priority and we will not rest until we find him!" - GW Bush, September 13, 2001

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." - GW Bush, March 13, 2002

President G W Bush's first pick to investigated the 911 Attack:
Henry Kissinger

"It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of what is perceived to be true." -- Henry Kissinger

"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy." Henry Kissinger, quoted by Bob Woodward in The Final Days, 1976

"Today Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government."

-- Henry Kissinger, from his grand finale address at the Bilderberger meeting at Evian, France, 21 May 1992

Individuals who knew beforehand the deep financial liabilities of their holdings, and profited greatly from the 911 attack
Bush Family
Peterson, Blackstone Mortgage holder on WTC, and Council of Foreign Relations.



The greedy leaders better be investigated and tried for treason, and removed from office. They've destroyed much of the Good America has done in the world, Peace Corps, symbol of freedom and diversity, and turned The US into a dirty word, with torture, spying and murders of innocent people. They've started a fascist military corporate dictatorship which Congress, must stop if they want to stay in Congress.

Evidence for Treason
by et al Monday, May. 01, 2006 at 5:28 AM

The President's credibility is at an all time low because of the uncovering of deception of reasons for the war in Iraq. At first we were made to think Sadamn Hussein and Bin Laden were responsible for 911. And the President uses 911 to justify the war. Yet he refuses to release documentation that was seized after 911. his stand on porous borders, the Dubais Port deal, now the arms industry all give credence to the war on terrorism is fabricated.

Skeptics watch Martial law with an open mind.

Federal government Corruption Exposed

Treason has been committed by members of both major parties. Unless it is brought out into the open now, those same traitors will as they have said, attack Iran with Nukes, and throw the world into Nuclear WW III.
On 9/11: Was the Asbestos-Laced World Trade Center "Disposable"?
This article with comments shows the WTC was targeted for insurance.

Neocons and Katrina

Larry Silverstein Pulls it Off


Bush okayed CIA leak?


Bush okayed CIA leak, Part 2
Bush okayed CIA leak, Part 2

Why is your tax money profiting the Jesuits?

PM America's greatest Threat


CNN Poll:AgreeU.S. government covered up the real events of the 9/11 attacks? Yes 84%

Chinese Military Handed No-Bid Contract On Key US Security
> Infrastructure
>  http://s13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=7325
>  http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/march2006/270306nobid.htm
> The Black Popes scenario for World War 3 & destruction by ERIC JON
>  http://s13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=2

Iran is Not a Threat to the U.S. nor Israel

Murtha or Bush on Iraq?

 link to video.google.com

 http://miami.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/3996.phpFormation of the Military Industrial Dictatorship

No censure: Impeach!

911 was an inside Job by Dick Cheney and PNAC


Loose Change This Video clearly shows the physical evidence of 911 that is contradictory to the Official Version of 911.

So you hate corporate control of America

Free Money!

Illuminati=Evil=Live for them, Die for them


Porous Borders prove the "War on Terrorism" is phony!

HS to combat the evil that is tofu
 http://www.st911.org/ Scholarsfor911Truth

Bush & MKULTRA Satanic killer who Bush pardoned while Governor, BOTH in same cult in '80s

Was WTC 7 an act of ARSON and an act of Government Terrorism?


David Ray Griffin finds evidence in the testimony of firefighters words ... they'd been under a do not talk order," they say demolition"
I trust the honesty and bravery of firefighters who are willing to risk their lives to save others!

CIA Resurrects Dead Bin Laden.WHY?
book chapter: Drug Running Bush Family and their Fake War on Drugs: Police as drug pushers


ZIOCON/GOP = another name for MAFIA MONEY; Abramoff scandal ties to 9-11 Atta drugrunning!

Oil and drugs are what the Illuminati loves

To Them EVIL= Live

Formation of the Military Industrial Dictatorship


 http://miami.indymedia.org/news/2006/03/3926.phpNo censure: Impeach

Who has the elite allied themselves with?zzzzzzzz
Globalization, is the brain child of the globalized Jesuit

Muslims weren't the Enemy who attacked us on 911!

 http://www.sjweb.info/index.cfm If their aims were really of tolerance and multicultural acceptance, they'd be harmless,
But their aim is to install the infallible Pope, God on Earth, and their oath is to destroy all nonbelievers. Their organization believes the End justifies the means. They want the Pope to rule from Jerusalem, and have been actively working toward that end.


China won't support sanctions against Iran:
Chinese FM maps out blueprint for EU-China ties:

Speaking of China
Who The Bush's have done a great deal to open trade with
what do you think of this:
Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio weapons have been invented one after another. Of course we have not been idle; in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of "cleaning up" America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focus instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy country.
We must prepare ourselves for two scenarios. If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack [on the United States, the Chinese people will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fight against the United States
........................................................It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century in which the CCP leads the world

Given the Western history of Asia, the British Opium wars, the British use of poison gas in WW I, it is easy to see China's threatened perceptions of the New American Empire being created by by the creators of PNAC= Project for a New American Century. For this reason Americans must come to the truth about the 911 attack on this country!
Recently the Pope said the appointments of Chinese Cardinals and Bishops "sadly" didn't have his blessing. I wonder if they have the blessings of the Jesuit General?

Weapons of mass destruction backfire and kill the source.

Here is someone's plan of How the attacked were pulled off:

1. In the 911 Commission Report it's specified that most of what is known about the alleged attempt of the passengers to retake the plane comes from the cockpit voice recorder. One little problem: the cockpit voice recorder DOES NOT record anything in the cabin, especially when the cockpit door is closed.
2. No large piece of the airliner wreckage was ever found. According to the official story, it basically vaporized. YET, the 911 Commission wants us to believe the cockpit voice recorder was found intact and in perfect working order.
3. We are supposed to believe that the terrorists were extremely smart and knowledgeable to disengage the transponder but at the same time ridiculously stupid as to forget to turn the airphones off. According to a friend of mine who trained on the 757, the two master switches (transponder and cabin airphones) are located on the very same central console, just a few inches apart, both within easy reach of the pilot and co-pilot.
4. There is no way cellphones can work from an altitude and a speed of 500+ mph, especially considering that the aircraft was flying over rural Pennsylvania, where wireless cells are extremely scattered. Moreover, the network 5 years ago was nowhere as reliable as it is today.
5. According to witnesses, pieces of the aircraft were found in a radius of about 100 miles around the alleged point of impact in Shanksville, PA. This is consistent with a mid-air explosion, not with the plane crashing on the ground.
6. It's very hard to believe that an amateur pilot could let a 757 go on a steep dive and then recover it. (*) All the while without experiencing airframe stress, resulting in some form structural collapse. Not to mention without consequences to the passengers.

(*) A truly comical scene for everyone who knows something about airplanes is when the terrorist pilot attempts to recover the aircraft from a steep dive by exercising force on the yoke. For the record, the 757 features fully fly-by-wire avionics (if you don't know what it means, goggle it.) But evidently the movie director has seen too many WWII movies and he thinks a 757 flies just like a B-17.
This theory is leading to the culprits.
9-11: The Flight of the Bumble Planes
by Snake Plissken as told to Carol A. Valentine

March 10, 2002 -- Eureka! One of my readers, who calls himself "Snake Plissken," has put it together. He tells us why the passenger lists of the four September 11 "suicide" jets were so small, how remote control was used, why the transponders were turned off, why the radar tracks of the four planes were confused, why there was no Boeing 757 debris at the Pentagon ...
By George, I think he's got it!
My e-mail exchanges with Snake took place over a series of days. With Snake's agreement, I have consolidated the exchanges, inserted some reference URLs, and made minor edits. My comments and additions will be bracketed thus [...]. As you read what Snake has to say, keep the following in mind:
"Magic is the pretended performance of those things which cannot be done. The success of a magician's simulation of doing the impossible depends upon misleading the minds of his audiences. This, in the main, is done by adding, to a performance, details of which the spectators are unaware, and leaving out others which they believe you have not left out. In short a performance of magic is largely a demonstration of the universal reliability of certain facts of psychology." (John Mulholland, The Art of Illusion, Charles Scribner & Sons, 1944.)
In what follows, Snake unravels the illusions of the 9-11 magicians.

You did some fine research on 9-11. You came within inches of solving the puzzle of the "suicide" jets, and now you need the rest of the story. Let me explain by making a suggestion.
Go visit a bumblebee hive some time, and try to keep your eye on just one bee. You can't do it. You get confused. Think of the 9-11 jets as bumblebees. Matter of fact, you could even call Operation 911 "Flight of the Bumble Planes."
I've worked in cryptology and there are many ways of hiding the truth. Substitute information, omit information, scramble the information out of sequence, and add nonsense (random garbage). All four methods were used on the 9-11 incident. Let me lay out the clues and show you where they lead.

· First Clue -- Few Passengers On The Four Flights
Many have remarked about the short passenger lists on the four 911 jets. You might get a low turnout for a 767 or 757 now and then, but four coast-to-coast flights taking off from the East inside of a few minutes of each other, all with short passenger lists? Nuts. That's your first clue.
· Second Clue -- First Report of First WTC Crash
The second clue comes from the first New York eyewitness on NBC. She had no question about what she saw. You could hear it in her voice. If she was the state's witness, the defense team would have their heads between their knees before she stopped talking.
What did she say? She heard an airplane coming in low and looked up. She saw a small private jet, and watched it fly into the first WTC tower, the North tower. She was certain in her description -- most people know the difference between a big round-nose commercial jet and a smaller plane.
[CV cmments:
In his testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on October 25, 2001, NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart said of the first September 11 report: "We were told it was a light commuter airplane. It didn't look like that was caused by a light commuter airplane."
"  http://www.ngaus.org/newsroom/HomelandDefenseTranscript.doc"
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/eberhart-testimony.html"]
Later, some dodgy report came in from an anonymous source in the "United Airlines Command Center" that American Airlines had a hijacking, and they gradually padded the story out until the viewer felt like he was part of an unfolding revelation on the size and make of the plane. So the first eyewitness's story got shellacked.
· Third clue -- Pentagon Crash
The first report on NBC said there had been an explosion near the Pentagon heliport. No mention of a plane.
If you were watching ABC, the first reports cited eyewitnesses who said a business jet had crashed into the Pentagon. Notice that this description is similar to the first report about the WTC. A small plane, not a big, round-nosed passenger jet.
Then ABC interviewed some media executive who said he "saw the whole thing" from his car on the freeway. It was an American Airlines passenger jet. Good luck the road didn't need his attention while he was gawking. And of course it was a big passenger jet scraping the light poles with it's belly as it came in low. And that story paved the way for the official truth.
· Fourth Clue -- No Boeing 757 Debris at Pentagon Crash Site.
By now lots of people have realized there is something very wrong with the story of Flight 77's crash into the Pentagon. What's the problem? The wingspan of a 757 is about 125 feet, with about 35 feet between the two jet engines.
["  link to web.archive.org
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/boeing757-200"]
The hole left by whatever hit the building was 70 feet across.
[US News & World Report, December 10, 2001, pg. 31
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/usn011210-1.jpg"]
After the smoke died down, everyone could see the Pentagon but no one could see the plane. The Pentagon is made of masonry -- limestone -- not steel and glass. The aluminum wings of the plane should have been ripped off and left outside the building. We should have seen wing wreckage. But there was none.
[CV comments:
[I have studied TV footage taken contemporaneously by various networks and reviewed photos from news magazines published just after 9-11. After the smoke died down, no Boeing 757 debris was visible.
See the following URLs at the website of the U.S. Army Military District of Washington, D.C., sent to me by researcher John DiNardo, . By the way, Mr. DiNardo suspects that inside explosives were used at the Pentagon on 9-11. Certainly the damaged section of the building had just been renovated; explosives would have been easy to install.
"  http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/news_photos/911/pages/firetruck.html"
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/pentagon6"
"  http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/news_photos/911/pages/capitolview.html"
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/pentagon5"
"  http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/news_photos/911/pages/cars-damaged.html"
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/pentagon2"
The scenes depicted by the US Army photos are consistent with contemporaneously published photos in the popular press. See, for example, US News and World Report, September 14, 2001, pg. 40.
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/usn010914-1.jpg"
and the photo that appeared in Newsweek's 2001 "Extra" edition, pgs. 26, 27.
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/nwkxtr-1.jpg"
This photograph below, with caption, appeared on the US Army Military District of Washington site. It unwittingly demonstrates that there was no Boeing 757 wreckage. Think now: a hundred thousand pounds of seats, framework, skin plates, engine parts, flaps, wheels, luggage, interior panels, electronics, and this little out-of-context scrap of God-knows what was shown by the Pentagon.
"  http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/news_photos/911/pages/planepiece.html"
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/pentagon0"
In the last several months, largely as a result of Mr. DiNardo's work, there has been growing Internet discussion of the lack of Boeing 757 debris outside the Pentagon. Now, magically, new photos of "Boeing 757" Pentagon wreckage are beginning to appear. Check out the websites of Mike Rivero and Joe Vialls for copies of these fakes. Rivero and Vialls, by endorsing them as real, have surely identified themselves as members of the fake opposition.
OK. Now back to Snake Plissken.]
· Fifth Clue -- Quality of Pilots in Pentagon crash
As you point out
[Operation 911: NO SUICIDE PILOTS, "  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/robotplane.html"]
the flying instructors who trained the "suicide" pilots of Flight 77 said they were hopeless. "It was like they had hardly even ever driven a car ..." The flight instructors called the two, "dumb and dumber," and told them to quit taking lessons.
Yet the Washington Post described the maneuvers of Flight 77 before it hit the Pentagon. The huge jet took a 270-degree hairpin turn to make its target. The Post said Flight 77 had to be flown by expert pilots.
Something is wrong here. Now "dumb and dumber" are expert pilots. That is your fifth clue.
· Sixth Clue -- Transponders Turned Off
As you point out, the "hijackers" turned off the transponders which transmit information showing the airline names, flight numbers, and altitude. But the FAA also uses conventional radar, so the "hijackers" must have known the planes were still visible. Why would the "hijackers" shut the transponders off, you asked? You are looking at your sixth clue.
["Did NORAD Send The 'Suicide' Jets?" Part 1
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/noradsend.html"]
· Seventh Clue -- Confusion On Radar Tracks
As you point out, some of these flights disappeared from the conventional radar scopes. [See above-cited URL.] That's your seventh clue.
· Eighth Clue -- Second WTC Tower Barely Hit
Have a look at the footage of the second WTC tower being hit. The plane almost missed the tower and just managed to hit the corner. Yet the first plane struck its target dead center. That's your eighth clue.
[See diagrams from Wag the WTC website at: ["  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/psyopnews/Extra/1/southtowerpath.jpg".]

· A Boeing 767 was secured and painted up to look like a United Airlines jet. It had remote controls installed in it, courtesy of some NORAD types. Call that plane "Pseudo Flight 175" and leave it parked at a military airfield for the moment.
· The number of the passengers on each flight was kept artificially low that day. Easy to do. Just monkey with the airline computers and show the fights full so no more tickets are sold. Include some of your own operatives in each flight, maybe.
· After the planes are in the air, the transponders must be shut down. There are a few ways to do this, maybe, but the simplest is this: Have one of the NORAD insiders call the pilots and say: "This is the North American Aerospace Defense Command. There is a national emergency. We are under terrorist attack. Turn off your transponders. Maintain radio silence. Here is your new flight plan. You will land at [name] military air base."
· The pilots turn off the transponders. The FAA weenies lose the information which identifies the airline, the flight number, and the altitude of the planes. Of course the planes can still be seen on conventional radar, but the planes are just nameless blips now.
· What did the radar show of the planes' flight paths? We'll never see the real records, for sure. But in the spy movies, when the spy wants to lose a tail, he gets a double to lead the tail one way while the spy goes the other. If I were designing Operation 911, I'd do that: As each of the original jets is flying, another jet is sent to fly just above or below it, at the same latitude and longitude. The blips of the two planes merge on the radar scopes. Alternately, a plane is sent to cross the flight path of the original plane. Again, the blips merge, just like the little bees you're watching outside the hive. The original planes proceed to the military airfield and air traffic control is thoroughly confused, watching the wrong blips ...
That's probably close to the way it was managed. Like I say, we'll never see the radar records so we won't know exactly.
[For the alleged flight paths of the four jets, see
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/4flights.html"
For names and locations of military airfields in the US, try
"  http://www.globemaster.de/bases.html"
You can search for a listing of bases in 9-11 related states by using the search engine.]
· A small remote controlled commuter jet filled with incendiaries/explosives -- a cruise missile, if you like -- is flown into the first WTC tower. That's the plane the first NBC eyewitness saw.
· The remote controlled "Pseudo Flight 175," decked out to look like a United airlines passenger jet, is sent aloft and flown by remote control -- without passengers -- and crashed into the second tower. Beautiful! Everyone has pictures of that.
Why did Pseudo Flight 175 almost miss the second tower? Because the remote operators were used to smaller, more maneuverable craft, not a big stubborn passenger jet. The operators brought the jet in on a tight circle and almost blew it because those jets do hairpin turns like the Queen Mary. They brought it in too fast and too close to do the job right and just hit the corner of the tower.
· Then another remote controlled commuter jet filled with incendiaries/explosives -- a cruise missile if you like -- hits the Pentagon, in the name of Flight 77.
· Eyewitnesses are a dime a dozen. Trusted media whores "witness" the Pentagon hit and claim it was an American Airlines Boeing 757, Flight 77. Reporters lie better than lawyers.
· Meanwhile, the passengers from Flights 11, 175, and 77, now at the military airfield, are loaded onto Flight 93. If you've put some of your own agents aboard, they stay on the ground, of course.
· Flight 93 is taken aloft.
· Flight 93 is shot down or bombed -- makes no difference which. Main deal is to destroy that human meat without questions. Easiest way to dispose of 15,000 lbs. of human flesh, and nobody gets a headline if they find a foot in their front garden. No mass graves will ever be discovered, either.
· The trail is further confused by issuing reports that Flight 77 was actually headed towards the White House but changed its course.
· The trail is further confused by having The Washington Post wax lyrical about the flying skills of non-existent pilots on a non-existence plane (Flight 77).
· The trail is further confused with conflicting reports and artificial catfight issues, such as -- did The Presidential Shrub really see the first tower hit on TV while he was waiting to read the story about the pet goat ...
So we know the Boeing that used to be Flight 93 was blown up. The other three original Boeings (Flights 11, 175, 77) still exist somewhere, unless they were cut up for scrap.
The passengers and crews of Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93 died in an airplane crash, just like the newspapers said. Only for most of them, it was the wrong crash. But that's as close to the truth as the news media likes to get anyway, so it works.

So there you have it. Not four planes. More than four took off from the East Coast airports: the four scheduled Boeings, the remote controlled Pseudo Flight 175 Boeing, and two small remote controlled jets or cruise missiles. Figure in a couple of extra planes to confuse the flight paths of the original passenger jets.
The four original Boeings had conventional controls. The look-alike Boeing and the two small jets were drones, rigged with remote control. You called it Global Hawk, and that's good enough. The mimic planes could have been piloted or remote controlled.
Why not just install remote control in four passenger jets like you described in "NO SUICIDE PILOTS"? Here's why: You might get remote control gear installed on a passenger jet so pretty the pilot would not notice, but that would be more work, more time, and more people. Then you would have to control your special plane through maintenance dispatch and try to get it lined up for that day, that time, that flight. Then you would have to multiply those efforts by four. There would be too many chances of things going wrong. Plane substitution would be much simpler. You'd just need the NORAD insiders, the personnel at the military airfield, and maybe an agent or two inside the FAA air traffic control system to make sure things go smoothly. That should not be too difficult because NORAD has sent lots of its people over to the FAA to work on the FAA radars.
[CV comments:
Gen. Eberhart, NORAD commander, told the Senate Armed Services Committee on October 25, 2001 that " ... we've actually moved manpower on the order of about 200 people over the years to the FAA to operate these radars." Cited in "Did NORAD Send The 'Suicide' Jets?" Part 2. See Eberhart testimony at
"  http://www.ngaus.org/newsroom/HomelandDefenseTranscript.doc"
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/eberhart-testimony.html"]
Some people have suggested the original passenger planes were used with the flight computers hacked and loaded with the collision coordinates for the targets. Maybe the job could have been done that way, but it was not. You know for sure it was not because flight computers do not fly planes the way those were flown. A flight computer is given a set of GPS points (geographic coordinates) to follow, and the computer charts the path between them, correcting for cross-winds and other errors. The flight computer flies smooth and gentle, the way passengers like it, without jerky corrections.
You know Flight 175 was not on that system when it hit the south tower because it came in fast (they say) in a tight hooking circle that almost missed the tower. An autopilot wouldn't make that mistake. The crash of flight 175 was not a pre-programmed flight computer finding the optimum path. What you see there in the path of 175 is a real-time controller fighting the physics of flight -- and almost losing it.
You've already dealt with the Joe Vialls Home Run explanation, so I don't have to analyze that again.
["  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/noradsend.html"]
I've seen another lame attempt to explain away what happened: Supposedly AWACS hit the planes with EMF and knocked out their manual electronics, then took over the 9-11 planes by remote and made them crash. That's a pipe dream. Anything that knocked out the electronics from a distance would turn a plane into a flying scrap heap. Those plane are completely dependent on electronics, and no remote beam could pick and choose which circuits to destroy and which to leave intact.

· Pentagon Security Photos
On March 7 CNN released four photographs taken by Pentagon security camera on September 11, 2001. Look at the photos:
"  http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/03/07/gen.pentagon.pictures/index.html"
The Washington Post says: "The first photo shows a small, blurry, white object near the upper right corner -- possibly the plane just a few feet about the ground," but admits "the hijacked American Airlines plane is not clearly visible." ("New Photos Show Attack on Pentagon," March 7, 2002.)
"  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A56670-2002Mar7.html"
Yeah, right, you can believe that the American Airlines plane is not visible.

· Fireman's Video of First Crash
The NBC eyewitness said the plane that flew into the North tower was small. This is corroborated by the fireman's video taken on September 11:
"  http://www.xemox.net/wtc/movies/first.plane.hits.gp.med.asf" [link expired]
[Note to reader: There are other versions of this clip on the Internet, but I have been unable to find one I can verify as the original clip. If you can find a verifiable copy, let me know. CV ]
In that clip, the camera shows a fireman with other workers casually discussing some street work. The fireman looks up over his left shoulder, then behind him, as though he is following a sound. The camera follows his gaze, finds nothing at the original location, then quickly moves to a shot of the WTC, visible through another corridor in the surrounding buildings.
Why does the cameraman focus on the WTC? I can only guess he heard the impact of the plane. The camera does not show the plane in the air prior to impact, so I assume it has already crashed.
In the first frames we see a puff of smoke from the impact site that grows into a cloud and erupts into flame. After a few seconds, the flame dies down and the smoke dissipates. At that moment, the camera shows the huge S-shaped gash in the side of WTC North.
[CV's comments, January 1, 2004: Another version of the "fireman's video" is now available at:
"  http://www.serendipity.ptpi.net/wot/north_tower.htm"
Footage from that clip shows a large plane -- not a small plane -- approaching the tower and crashing into it.]
If the wings of a large jet made that gash, the gash should not be S-shaped. The gash should be a straight line like the wings of the jet. But more important: if the impact of the jet made the gash, the gash should appear at the moment of impact when the camera is first drawn to the building. Instead, it appears AFTER the smoke and flame.
["  http://www.public-action.com/911/gamma.jpg"
"  http://www.public-action.com/911/gamma2.jpg" ]
· The Hijackers
I have read reports that some of the alleged hijackers are actually still alive. This suggests the hijacker scenario and the resultant mid-air telephone calls to the relatives is pure bull. But I can't verify the alleged hijackers are still alive, so let's move on.
It would be easy for the 9-11 planners to collect the names of people with Muslim-sounding names who were taking flying lessons around the country. Just before 9-11 happens, they are disappeared. Then mid-air phone calls are created, reporting hijackers who were never aboard the planes. That would work.
As you and many people have noticed, the Muslim names don't appear on the passenger lists of the four flights. The hijackers' names don't even appear on the list of passengers released by United on September 12 -- the list of passengers on Flights 175 and 93.
["  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/uapassngerlist"]
Sure it was careless not to put the Arab names on the passenger lists, but nobody's perfect.

Just to show you how scripted the Flight 93 hijacking thing was, think about the alleged phone calls from the passengers on Flight 93 to their next of kin in the moments before the crash. Supposedly, they learned of the attacks on the Pentagon and the WTC with their handy cell phones, and they figured out their own plane was hijacked for a similar purpose. So they decided to be heroes and take the plane away from the hijackers.
According to the Dallas Morning News: "The fourth time Thomas Burnett Jr. phoned his wife, Deena, he acknowledged up front: 'I know we're going to die. There's three of us who are going to do something about it.'"
[Dallas Morning News, "Trapped in the skies, captives fought back," September 17, 2001.
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/dmnheroes"]
Heroic, wasn't it? And not a dry hanky in the house. The heroes of modern America. A high school basketball star, a college rugby player, a forest ranger, a woman police officer ...
But why did it have to be suicide heroism? "They knew their deaths were inevitable, according to some family members with whom they spoke on the phone, and they didn't want thousands more to die with them." It makes a better story, of course. "Suicide Heroes Defeat Suicide Hijackers."
Why did they have to die? The crew was still alive and "herded at knife point to the back of the plane, where the passengers were being held," according to the same report. They weren't dead. If the passengers got control from the hijackers, couldn't the crew fly the plane? Why didn't those brave heroes say things like, "There's a chance we might save this boat"? But they said, "I know we're going to die."
Obviously, this script was concocted in midnight bull sessions like they had in Dustin Hoffman's mansion in "Wag the Dog". And the American public has been trained on weak plots for decades on prime time TV, so they don't WANT to think their way out of a wet paper bag. It spoils the show.
Only the writers and producers of Operation 911 knew that the passengers of Flight 93 had to die. But the temptation was too much, so they put it in the passenger dialog, too. And that's how you know the cell phone calls are just theater, not fact.
By the way, if I was planning this operation, I'd put some fictitious names on the passenger list, so when the flight went down, the media could interview fake relatives. Like that Operation Northwoods plan in which a fake Cuban jet would shoot down a fake American passenger jet. Whoever planned that must have planned to use fake grieving relatives, too.
["  http://www.Public-Action.com//911/northwds.html"]
And then of course I've heard they can do marvelous things with voice simulation. How about that fellow who called his mother from Flight 93 and said "Mom, this is Mark Bingham." That has all the truth of a plaster fish trophy. That one guy, Todd Beamer, with the pregnant wife -- she didn't talk to him directly, she just got a message from the answering service.
[The Final Moments of Flight 93," September 22, 2001, by Karen Breslau (NEWSWEEK WEB EXCLUSIVE)
"  http://www.msnbc.com/news/632626.asp"
"  http://www.Public-Action.com/911/finalmoments93"]

Is this all too much for your to swallow? Don't you believe people would conspire to pull all this off? Well, look at the stakes. This current war will go on for years and blot out one of the world's great religions, legitimize military rule in the United States, redistribute the world's oil resources, and change the entire power structure of planet Earth. All that's needed to make it happen is ambition, chutzpah, "a few good men," and a nation that is willing to be deceived.
The problem with people like you when you try to understand events like this, you are not a trained killer. When you come to wiping out the whoever, you shrink back. That's normal. That is one of the things you have to train out of a soldier.
But when a soldier plans something like this, he doesn't flinch at the killing. He just takes that into the plans like one more or one less egg in the omelet. If he has to kill the enemy or Americans or even himself, it doesn't matter because sometimes he has to do that to win. He's trained that way.
The only thing that matters is the Objective. Whatever a soldier has to do to win the Objective, that is what he has to do. All of this false piety about suicide bombers is nuts. Well trained Americans would do that if you ordered them to. If they didn't, they weren't well trained.
Top of Form 1
Bottom of Form 1

So you have to kill a hundred, a thousand, or five thousand civilians, you just do it in the best way that will help the Objective.
-- Snake Plissken (as told to Carol A. Valentine)

by reader Wednesday, May. 10, 2006 at 6:20 AM

In  LOCT@yahoogroups.com, conscientiousobjector2000@y... wrote:

Uncovering the Hidden
Bronfman, Bush, Cheney
Seagrams, Zapata, Brown & Root

After serving as Secretary of Defense for President Bush, Cheney
the financial rewards of the revolving money door between the military
and industry. Cheney became a member of the board of directors of
Stanley. the Union Pacific Corp., Procter & Gamble Co. and Electronic
Data Systems Corp. (Ross Perot company) But, most important, in 1995
Cheney became the CEO of Halliburton (owner of Brown and Root) (
the chairman of the board, holds a $45.5 million stake as
biggest individual stockholder. Brown and Root reaped multi-millions
from the Bosnia war.
In 1998 Richard Cheney got the idea that Halliburton should purchase
Dresser Industries, for $8.1 billion (creating the world's largest
oil-drilling services company) while on a quail hunt with Dresser
Bill Bradford. Dresser and Halliburton merged. Dresser Industries
was owned and operated by Brown Brothers Harriman. Prescott Bush
H.W.'s father) was a partner of Brown Brothers and on the board of
Dresser for decades until he became a U.S. Senator.
PERMINDEX was a corporate front, headed by Major Louis M. Bloomfield
Canada. Clay Shaw operated a division of PERMINDEX in New Orleans at
the International Trade Mart. The connections between Clay Shaw, David
Ferrie and Lee Harvey Oswald have, at this time, been proven by
documentary and photographic evidence, despite myriad attempts to
discredit the Garrison investigation.
Halliburton was one of the financiers of PERMINDEX. George and Herman
Brown of Brown and Root were also financiers. Halliburton acquired
and Root after 1963. In the Nomenclature of an Assassination Cabal,
William Torbitt, states:
The principal financiers of Permindex were a number of U. S. oil
companies, H. L. Hunt of Dallas, Clint Murchison of Dallas, John
DeMenil, Solidarist director of Houston, John Connally as executor of
the Sid Richardson estate, Haliburton Oil Co., Senator Robert Kerr of
Oklahoma, Troy Post of Dallas, Lloyd Cobb of New Orleans, Dr. Oschner
New Orleans, George and Herman Brown of Brown and Root, Houston,
Attorney Roy M. Cohn, Chairman of the Board for Lionel Corporation,
York City, Schenley Industries of New York City, Walter Dohrnberger,
ex-Nazi General and his company, Bell Aerospace, Pan American World
Airways, its subsidiary, Intercontinental Hotel Corporation, Paul
Raigorodsky of Dallas through his company, Claiborne Oil of New
Credit Suisse of Canada, Heineken's Brewery of Canada and a host of
other munition makers and NASA contractors directed by the Defense
Industrial Security Command.
PERMINDEX was the operator of death squads in Europe, Mexico, Central
American, the Caribbean and the United States. The persons and
corporations who worked with PERMINDEX took over the government of the
United States of America on November 22, 1963. The perpetrators have
never been brought to justice, and now Halliburton, a Permindex
thus and financer of the ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY, has one
its own, Dick Cheney, trying to be the Vice President of the United
Researchers of the JFK assassination have tried since 1963 to
if George H.W. Bush had any intelligence role in November 1993.
Efforts to conclusively prove that George H. W. Bush was a CIA agent
that time have been futile. Efforts to conclusively prove that he was
directly involved with the Cuban exiles have also been futile. This is
so, despite the close proximity of the Zapata oil platform to Cuba and
the naming of boats for the Bay of Pigs invasion, notably the
"Barbara." However, the financial and corporate structures which have
financed George H.W. Bush and now his son, can be conclusively proven
The following article by Linda Minor is an analysis of these financial
and corporate roots of the Bush family political and financial
fortune. Note how these roots lead to the Harrimans, British
Intelligence (right-wing variety) and to Halliburton and Brown and
thus to PERMINDEX.
by Linda Minor © 2000
Who were the clients of Brown Brothers Harriman when Prescott Bush and
his wife's father, George H. Walker, worked for them? It was these
investors who funded George H.W. Walker's campaigns. His biggest
contributors were his uncle Herbie Walker, formerly of St. Louis, and
Eugene Meyer, whose father spent his entire career working for a
competing investment bank--Lazard Freres--or Lazard Brothers, as it
called in London.
The Bush family ties to the Lairds and Lords of Scotland and England.
Lazard Brothers was controlled by officials in the British
government. It was always the investment bank of David
Rockefeller. And, besides Meyer and Walker, George Bush's other large
investor in Bush-Overbey was British Assets Trust, Ltd., an investment
company whose directors interlocked with the management of companies
associated with Lord Kindersley, such as Hudson's Bay Company. The
chairman of British Assets Trust in 1956 was J.G.S. Gammell in
Edinburgh, Scotland, and in 1985 by J.C.R. Inglis, a partner in
& Wedderburn, WS, an Edinburgh law firm. Inglis was also a director
of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group, Scottish Provident Institution
Mutual Life Assurance, Edinburgh American Assets Trust and Atlantic
Assets Trust, as well as chairman of European Assets, N.V., Gammell
also had served as director of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group, as
such other notables as The Right Hon. Lord Balfour of Burleigh, The
Right Hon. Lord Clydesmuir and The Right Hon. Lord Polwarth.
Polwarth, incidentally, began serving as a director of the Halliburton
Company, parent of Brown & Root, in 1974.
The Bush family continued to amass its fortune an power from the
and Scottish sources named above, as these sources introduced their
financial tentacles into Texas, and as George H.W. Bush and Barbara
drove that old red Studebaker into Houston. Has anything changed?
Do the same people run the selection of Dick Cheney as Vice President
today? Will their scion, that old Skull & Bonesman, George W. be
The PERMINDEX connection to the Bush power moves.
Paravicini Bank and Permindex
In the same year that Zapata and Pennzoil were moving toward hostile
takeovers, a new Swiss bank opened in Houston with J. Hugh Liedtke
and George Bush's securities adviser, W.S. Farish III, among the
directors. Called "Bank for Investment and Credit Berne" (BICB),
its stock was owned by Capital National Bank and Paravicini Bank, but
investors included Seagrams, Boeing, Minute Maid in Zurich, the
London subsidiary of Brown and Root and the Schlesinger
Organization of London and Johannesburg. These investors are
more than interesting in light of the fact that Paravicini is a
descendant of the Venetian Pallavicini family, whose attorney in Rome,
Carlo d'Amelio, was the general counsel to Centro Mondiale
Commerciale (CMC),
the Italian arm of Permindex. CMC was incorporated in Berne
Switzerland, and D' Amelio sat on the board of directors during the
time that Seagrams' attorney, Louis Mortimer Bloomfield of
Montreal, was chairman of Permindex.
When the role of CMC in the attempted assassination of President
DeGaulle of France was discovered, it fled Europe and re-emerged in
Johannesburg, South Africa. However, the parent company,
Permindex, continued to be managed from Montreal by Bloomfield. Clay
Shaw, the man prosecuted in New Orleans by Jim Garrison for his
role in the Kennedy assassination, was also a board member of CMC,
with which his International Trade Mart had connections.
According to a 1970 report called "The Torbitt Document," (, William
Torbitt, states: "...a compilation of information gathered by a Texas
attorney from "court-approved and documented evidence" from sources
in the U.S. Customs Department and the Narcotics Bureau, from the
Commission and the Garrison investigations, Bloomfield's Permindex
supervised five subsidiary groups:
(1) "White Russian" organization called the Solidarists--members
Nagy of Dallas (former Hungarian premier) and Jean De Menil of Houston
(head of Schlumberger);
(2) American Council of Churches--H.L. Hunt organization;
(3) Free Cuba Committee--Carlos Prio Soccaras (Cuban ex-president);
(4) "The Syndicate"--Clifford Jones and Bobby Baker working with
Joe Bonanno Mafia family;
(5) NASA's Security Division--Werner Von Braun, headquarters in
Arsenal in Muscle Shoals, Alabama and on East Broad Street in

The Kennedy assassination was planned and carried out by Division Five
of the FBI, which acted in conjunction with the Defense
Intelligence Agency under the control of the Joint Chiefs.
These divisions had a highly secret police agency called the
Defense Industrial Security Command, which also worked with NASA, the
Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), USIA and weapons and ammunition
supply corporations (munitions makers) which contract with
those agencies. The police force originated in the 1930's to
work for the Tennessee Valley Authority, then expanded to the AEC,
it in with army intelligence. Agents of this force included Clay
Shaw, Guy Bannister, David Ferrie, Lee Harvey Oswald, Jack Ruby and
others, and was headed up by Bloomfield.
According to the Torbitt report:
The principal financiers of Permindex were a number of U.S. oil
companies, H.L. Hunt, Clint Murchison, John De Menil, Solidarist
director of Houston, John Connally, as executor of Sid Richardson
estate, Haliburton [sic] Oil Co., Sen. Robert Kerr of Okla., Troy Post
of Dallas, Lloyd Cobb of New Orleans, Dr. Oechner of New Orleans,
George and Herman Brown of Brown & Root, Attorney Roy M. Cohn,
of the Board for Lionel Corp., New York City, Schenley Industries of
York City, Walter Dornberger, ex-Nazi general and his company, Bell
Aerospace, Pan American World Airways and its subsidiary,
Intercontinental Hotel Corp., Paul Raigorodsky of
Claiborne Oil of New Orleans, Credit Suisse of Canada, and Heineken's
Brewery of
Canada and a host of other munitions makers and NASA contractors
directed by
the Defense Industrial Security Command.
Roy Cohn was a very close friend of Lewis Rosenstiel, who was in turn
a friend of Sam Bronfman. Bloomfield was also president of
Heineken of Canada. What these companies seem to have in common is
their shareholders, directors and financiers. They are the same
persons who invested in Bush-Overbey, Zapata and Dresser Industries
through the investment trusts they controlled. The 1992 edition of
Dope, Inc. (a LaRouche publication) has this to say about the banks
Both Seagram's (and its old Prohibition rum-running partner, Hudson's
Bay) are interlocked through a maze of contacts with all five of
the big Canadian chartered banks: the Bank of Montreal, the Royal
Bank of Canada, the Bank of Nova Scotia, the Toronto Dominion
Bank, and the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. Thus, the
dirty money gleaned from the drug trade is conduited through these
banks to points further south: The banks' offshore centers in the
Caribbean, and from there the money makes its whirlpool round of
worldwide laundering.

The chairman of this Houston-based international investment bank,
BICB, whose investors included Seagrams and the Schlesinger mining
interests in South Africa, was Johan F. (Fred) Paravicini.
Vice-chairman was L.F. McCollum, Sr.-a long-time Humble Oil
employee, who headed Conoco and founded Capital National Bank of
Houston in 1965. The bank's president was Baker Lovett, cousin of
James A. Baker III, and grandson of the first president of Rice
University, Odell Lovett, a friend of Woodrow Wilson at Princeton.
In an interview with the Houston Post, Baker stated that his
of 15 years in banking indicated that Houston had a relatively
short supply of money, and that venture capital had to come from New
England-from "more mature economies." He believed a bank "should
dedicate a portion of its resources to relatively risky situations
because it's those which sometimes really pay off." As the 1980s
showed, however, it was also that type of investment that resulted
in the bailout of the savings and loan industry.
In addition to its investment in the BICB set up by Conoco's chairman,
Seagrams also owned a great deal of stock in Conoco and caused a major
eruption with DuPont in 1981 over who would control the company.
Seagrams was interested in Conoco because it owned a 53% interest
in Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Co. in Canada. Since it had recently
received $2.3 billion cash profit from the sale of Sunoco stock, with
which it had tried and failed to purchase control of DuPont's St. Joe
Minerals, the Scottish-financed liquor barons at Seagrams saw
another chance to grab something prized by the New Englanders-control
In 1969 W.S. Farish III was 31 years old and was a partner in the
investment companies of Underwood Neuhaus and W.S. Farish & Co.,
through which he handled millions of dollars of his family's
wealth in addition to George Bush's blind trust. Farish was
also serving as president of a company called Fluorex, an
international mineral and exploration company, and in 1973 also
became a director of Houston Natural Gas. He was the only
grandson of one of the founders of Humble Oil, W.S. Farish, Sr., who
had been chairman of Standard Oil of New Jersey prior to World War
II. W.A. Harriman & Co. helped Jersey Standard finance a merger
with I.G. Farben,
the German chemical corporation which manufactured the gas used to
so many Jews.
Lehman Brothers, which had an office in Capital National Bank's
at 1300 Main-on the same floor, incidentally, as George Bush's friend
(and later, Commerce Secretary, Robert Mosbacher), was represented on
the board of the Capital National and its international investment
branch. One director was Lehman Brothers partner, John B. Carter,
Jr., and another was director I.H. "Denny" Kempner III, heir to the
Imperial Sugar fortune, whose brother was a Lehman representative in
The Kempner brothers' mother was Mary Carroll Kempner, a granddaughter
W.T. Carter and sister of W.T. Carter, Jr., whose wife was Lillie
Neuhaus, making them first cousins of Victor J. Carter. Lillie
was a niece of C.L. Neuhaus and W. Oscar Neuhaus, the founders
of Neuhaus & Co. (later Underwood Neuhaus). Oscar's son,
Hugo, married Kate Rice, Libbie Farish's cousin, and after W.S. and
Libbie's son died in 1943, their daughter-in-law, Mary Wood
Farish, married Kate Neuhaus' son. The Oscar Neuhaus who became
trustee for the wealthy Cullen family and secretary of a joint
venture between Dresser and Cullen interests, was a key member of the
Neuhaus/Farish banking interests-which thus had control of
Cullen/Dresser real estate matters in downtown Houston. This
relationship resulted in the construction of a
complex of office buildings in the southwest part of downtown leased
Dresser, Cullen/Frost Bank, Enron, Oppenheimer & Co. and assorted
interesting companies. The Carter family also were investment bankers
in Houston.
Still another director of Capital Bank was Bill Barziza, a descendant
of Decimus et Ultimus Barziza, founder of Houston Land & Trust,
which has since merged into First International Bank. This ancestor
was the son of a Venetian count and French-Canadian mother, born in
Williamsburg, Virginia, who, during the Civil War, had been captured
at Gettysburg and smuggled through the Confederate underground to
Canada where he was returned to Houston via the blockade route through
The decision to form a partnership with Paravicini may have also been
influenced by another Lehman representative-William Mellon
Hitchcock--grandson of William Larimer Mellon, founder of Gulf Oil,
and nephew of banker Andrew Mellon. Bush's partners in Zapata
were the sons of William Liedtke, Sr.-one of the "highest
ranking lawyers in Gulf Oil Corp."
Billy Mellon Hitchcock worked from 1961 to 1967 for "his father's
mentor," Bobby Lehman of Lehman Brothers in Manhattan. Fred
Paravicini began an illegal trading relationship with Billy in 1965,
which they were not indicted until 1973-Hitchcock in February and
Paravicini in June. Hitchcock pled guilty in April. He then
appears to have disappeared from sight.
What Hitchcock shows us is a classic fondi member, educated at
Harvard, trained at Lazard Brothers during Lord Cowdray's tenure,
who while vacationing in Venice, is recruited to work for CIA-
investment bank with connections to the Bronfman family by a member
of his father's polo team! How did he manage to get caught?
These people never get caught.
But what was never followed up on was how Hitchcock and Paravicini
connected to Conoco, Seagrams, Standard Oil, Brown & Root and the
Schlesinger mines in Johannesburg. These connections lead straight
to Permindex, the Bronfmans and to the Dallas oil men funding the
JFK assassination. They also lead to George Bush through W.S.
Farish-investor of his blind trust.
The Pearson Group and Texas oil men.
Although it has never been proven that Farish, Liedtke or George Bush
had any background in intelligence operations before Bush was
appointed director of the CIA by Gerald Ford in 1976, an inference
can be made just by reviewing the associations that existed in the
oil community in the 1960s. Billy's training as an investment banker
taken place at the English branch of Lazard Freres, which has been
to be closely tied to one of George Bush's original investors, Eugene
Meyer, and to Everett DeGolyer, a Dresser director who had spent most
his career working for Sir Weetman Pearson (Viscount Cowdray).
DeGolyer left his job at Amerada Petroleum in New York and moved to
Dallas where he established a geological consulting firm called
DeGolyer and MacNaughton and served from 1954 until his death in 1956
on the board of Dresser Industries in Dallas. He was replaced on
the board by his partner, Lewis W. MacNaughton, who remained until
Lewis MacNaughton was also a director of Empire Trust, a company
whose largest single holding of stock was comprised of Loeb-Lehman,
Bache and Bronfman holdings, in which Edgar Bronfman became a director
in 1963.
Edgar Bronfman, Sr. married the daughter of John L. Loeb (Loeb,
Rhoades), who was himself married to a Lehman. A vice-president
of Empire Trust in Dallas was Jack Crichton (also president of Nafco
Oil & Gas, Inc.) who was connected with Army Reserve
Intelligence. In a 1995 book written by Fabian Escalante,
the chief of a Cuban counterintelligence unit during the late
1950s and early 1960s, he describes that as soon as intelligence was
received from agents in Cuba that Fidel Castro had "converted to
communism," a plan called "Operation 40" was put into effect by the
National Security Council, presided over by Vice-President Richard
Nixon. Escalante
indicates that Nixon was the Cuban "case officer" who had assembled
an important group of businessmen headed by George Bush and Jack
Crichton, both Texas oilmen, to gather the necessary funds for the
operation. Nixon was a protégé of Bush's father Preston [sic] who
in 1946 had supported Nixon's bid for Congress. In fact, Preston Bush
was the campaign strategist that brought Eisenhower and Nixon to the
presidency of the United States. With such patrons, [Tracy] Barnes
was certain that failure was impossible.
According to Peter Dale Scott, Crichton arranged for Marina Oswald to
have Ilya Mamantov as her interpreter when she was questioned after
Oswald's arrest. Mamantov also taught scientific Russian classes
at Magnolia Oil Co. Lee and Marina Oswald first met the Paines at
a party at the home of Richard Pierce and Everett Glover where
practically all the guests worked for Magnolia Oil. The guests
a German named Volkmar Schmidt who came to Dallas in 1961 to do
geological research at Magnolia's laboratories in nearby
MacNaughton's personal accountant was George Bouhe, who also worked
at the
Tolstoy Foundation with Paul Raigorodsky-a man involved with the
National Alliance of Solidarists. Bouhe was closely tied to George
DeMohrenschildt, who later became famous as the White Russian assigned
to "handle" Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas. It was DeMohrenschildt who
had taken the Oswalds to a party where they met Volkmar Schmidt,
and then a later party at the same house where they met Michael
Paine. DeMohrenschildt was also the one in charge of getting
Marina a place to stay at Ruth Paine's home, and it was Ruth Paine who
found Oswald the job at the book depository office in the building
owned by Jack Crichton's friend.
DeMohrenschildt also was involved with the Russian Orthodox Church
Outside Russia in Dallas which received subsidies from the Baird
Foundation, which was determined to be a CIA conduit by the Patman
House Select Committee hearings [cf. New York
Times, March 5, 1967, p. 36].
DeMohrenschildt immigrated to the U.S. in 1938, having been involved
in espionage with the OSS and probably with the Nazis. He had a
doctorate in commerce from the University of Liege, Belgium, when
he came to the United States at age 27 where his brother Dmitry
was a professor at Dartmouth, having degrees from Columbia and
Yale. While visiting his brother and American sister-in-law at
Bellport, near East Hampton, on the eastern, ocean tip of Long
Island, DeMohrenschildt met many influential people, including
stockbroker Jack and Janet Bouvier (Jackie's parents). He was also
a friend of Margaret Clark Williams, whose family had vast land
holdings in Louisiana, who gave him a letter of introduction to
Humble Oil.
DeMohrenschildt came to Texas by bus "where he got a job with Humble
Oil Company in Houston, thanks to family connections," and, "[d]espite
being friends with the chairman of the board of Humble," he worked as
a roughneck in the Louisiana oil fields. DeMohrenschildt came to
Texas in 1944 and got a master's degree in petroleum geology at the
University of Texas at Austin. For a time he worked overseas
for the Murchisons' Three States Oil and Gas and for Pantipec, an
oil company owned by William F. Buckley, Jr.'s father operated in
Mexico at the same time Sir Weetman Pearson (later Viscount Cowdray)
and DeGolyer were there running the Mexican Eagle. In fact,
Buckley and his brother were the attorneys for the Mexican oil
companies after their properties were taxed illegally by the Mexican
government. According to William Engdahl, Pearson worked for
British Secret Intelligence, "as did all other major British oil
groups." They had financed and put in power the regime of General
Victoriano Huerta, subsequently overthrown by President Woodrow
Wilson, who was supporting the objectives of Standard Oil in
attempting to take from Britain at least a portion of its concessions
for half of Mexico's oil.
The U.S. under Rockefeller cover sent money and arms to Carranza.

Notes (The Deep Politics of the Bush Family Political Empire by Linda
Minor © 2000):
Pete Brewton, The Mafia, the CIA and George Bush, p. 137. Brewton's
information came from two articles in the Houston Post-dated April 25,
1969 and January 11, 1970. The earlier article, naming the
corporate investors in the new bank, had no by-line.
Dope, Inc. (1992), p. 459.
Dope , Inc., p. 256. The Royal Bank of Canada is said by the EIR
writers of Dope, Inc. to be the dirtiest bank, followed closely by the
Bank of Nova Scotia, of which Bronfman aide and Zionist, R.D.
Wolfe, is a director. This bank is also involved in the financing
of business in Jamaica tied to the arms trade, as well as being tied
to the Canadian gold markets through an interlock with Noranda Mines.
The gold exchange also serves as a means of payment for the
illegal weapons trade.
The Paracinis.
The Paravicinis are the descendants, most likely, of Sir Horatio
Pallavacino, who filled the post of Venetian ambassador to England --
which had been vacant for 50 years or so -- in 1603 when James VI of
Scotland became James I of Great Britain. Pallavicino was the head
of an intelligence service which "was at the disposal of Cecil, as,
presumably, was his money." See David Cherry, The Found of Englands
Civil Warres Discover'd, as cited in Al and Rachel Douglas's
manuscript on Venice. The "more mature economies" he
referred to in New England were those which began with the
first life insurance company established in America in 1762 by the
Presbyterian Ministers Fund. The managers brought in to oversee this
fund were members of British banking families such as the Bevans of
Barclays Bank-which was later to assimilate most of the country and
colonial banks into its London bank. Through these family and social
contacts, connections arose between the Canadian banks, Scottish
banks, the Far East, South Africa, the Caribbean and New England.
These same families also had strong ties to the Carolinas which was
originally settled by a great number of Scottish emigrants who
strong ties to the mother country. Another chapter will detail
fondi control of this and other companies founded by John Henry
Kirby-railroads, lumber, oil and banking interests financed by Brown
Brothers of Baltimore and the Maryland Trust. This representative was
James Carroll Kempner . See Harold M.Hyman, Oleander Odyssey, p.
217. It had been the tradition in the Kempner family for the
sons to attend Harvard, then spend a year in Paris before
coming back to Texas to help with the family business. Mary
later married Lawrence Reed. Mary's aunt was Frankie Carter
Randolph, who became the famous liberal Democrat who mentored Billie
Carr in liberal Texas politics. Julius V. Neuhaus (Lillie Neuhaus
Carter's brother) married Laura Boettcher, whose family brokerage
company also came into the company in 1985 when Larry Johnson and Tom
Masterson came into the company.
The Mischer connections to George H. W. Bush.
Connections can be shown between Larry Johnson, General Homes and
Walter Mischer - a close friend and fund-raiser for George
Bush-through an assortment of
complicated corporate relationships. He was the founder of Houston
Land & Trust Company, the first trust institution in the State of
Texas. Marie Phelps McAshan, On the Corner of Main and Texas: A
Houston Legacy (Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.,
1985), p. 130; Marguerite Johnston, Houston, the Unknown City,
1836-1946 (College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 1991), pp. 75
and 404fn. The name "Barziza" is similar in sound to "Barozzi,"
which was the name of one of the case vecchie that existed in Venice
[Allen and Rachel Douglas, manuscript entitled "Venice: The
Fondi.and related matters", p. 12]
Thomas Petzinger, Jr., Oil & Honor: The Texaco-Pennzoil Wars (G. P.
Putnam's Sons: New York), p. 36. Incidentally, Allen Dulles,
before becoming director of the CIA, had been legal counsel to Gulf
Oil for Latin American operations, as well as counsel to
Prescott Bush at Brown Brothers Harriman. Webster Griffin
Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin, George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography
(EIR: Washington, D.C., 1992), pp. 148-49). John McCloy also
represented Gulf in 1975 when the scandal involving bribery and
of elected officials occurred. Billy's father, Tommy Hitchcock, a
Harvard graduate, had become a Lehman Brothers partner in 1937 but
within two years became an air attaché in the U.S. Embassy and then a
pilot in Carl Spaatz' Ninth Air Support Command, where he was chief of
tactical research. His plane went down in 1944, when his twin
sons, Billy and Tommy were only five. He had learned to fly
during the First World War when he had served in the Lafayette
Escadrille as a seventeen-year-old and had been caught behind German
lines, escaped from a prison train and hobbled a hundred miles into
Switzerland. The
Hitchcocks were "gentry, a clan whose way of living 'depicted the
English country
life,'" in Aiken, South Carolina, where Billy spent his visits fox
hunting and playing polo. According to Billy, his grandfather had gone
to Oxford, and his great-grandfather had been financial editor of the
New York Sun, married to a descendant of William Corcoran, an
"eminent Georgetown financier." Billy and his brother attended
boarding school in South Carolina, a place run like an English public
school. In the mid-50s
he got a job as a tool dresser on oil rigs in Pecos, Texas (which is
a short distance from Midland where George Bush was living and working
for a Dresser subsidiary), then at a refinery near Vienna,
Austria. Billy had been at Harvard before Harvard professor
Timothy Leary took his first LSD trip in 1960, but he met Leary in
after Leary had returned from Mexico where he had been doing
psychedelic research with Aldous Huxley. In fact, Billy rented his
family country estate in New York to Leary to continue his drug
New York Times, June 8, 1973. Darwin Payne, Initiative in Energy:
Dresser Industries, Inc.1880-1978 (New York: Simon and Schuster,
1979), pp. 232 and 388. DeGolyer's death was reported in a
December 15, 1956 Houston Post article, which stated that he "shot
himself to death Friday in his Dallas office. His death was ruled
a suicide. No immediate reason for DeGolyer's act could be
determined. However, DeGolyer's son, E.L. DeGolyer, Jr. said his
father had been in ill health for seven years and for the last two
suffered from aplastic anemia, a disease similar to leukemia. He
said his father required frequent blood transfusions, having had
the most recent one about four weeks ago.
DeGolyer had other difficulties, his son said, including an operation
for a detached retina in 1949, which was not successful and left him
without the sight of one eye." None of those facts answers the
question of why, at that particular time, he chose to kill
himself. He had endured all those trials for years and survived
optimistically. In the year before DeGolyer died, two men began
buying land in the area of town which is now the location of the
Galleria Shopping Center. One was the son of Grover J. Geiselman,
an independent oil man who officed at Suite 849 of the Houston Club
Building, where both Farish and Bush were located during this
time. Eventually
Geiselman conveyed his half interest to the other buyer, J.S.
Michael, who in 1961 deeded to the estate of E.L. DeGolyer for a
nominal sum, indicating they may have been holding title for him
all along. Further indication of this is the deed in 1969 to
Stephen T. Cochran, Trustee, executed by both Geiselman, Jr. and J.S.
Michael, as well as Nell DeGolyer and First National Bank in Dallas,
Trustees for the estate, as well as the three daughters and their
husbands. All were joint payees on one promissory note. This land
ended up having frontage on either side of the West Loop, which was
constructed through the tracts, which were purchased for a pittance
from Italians who had owned the land for decades.
DeGolyer's death is reminiscent of the death of Howard R. Hughes,
Sr., which was reported in a Houston Post January 15, 1949 "Post
Yesteryears 15 Years Ago" column. The article stated: "Howard
R. Hughes, 54, millionaire Houston manufacturer, and a brother of
Rupert Hughes, the novelist, died suddenly in his office at the
Humble building yesterday. Born in Lancaster, Mo., Mr. Hughes
graduated from Harvard university in 1897..As a young Harvard
graduate, Mr. Hughes entered the oil industry in the Old Sour Lake
field and almost immediately began inventing oil well tools. Oil men
said that he, more than any other man in America, was responsible
for revolutionizing the oil industry. In association with W.B.
Sharp of Houston, the Sharp-Hughes Tool company was launched by Mr.
Hughes, and on Mr. Sharp's retirement, the concern became the Hughes
Tool company which is known wherever drillers operate."
Stephen Birmingham, "Our Crowd": The Great Jewish Families of New
York (New York: Dell Publishing Co., 1967), pp. 444-445.
Dick Russell, The Man Who Knew Too Much (New York: Carroll & Graf
Publishers/Richard Gallen, 1992), p. 615 and pp. 792-93 fn. 14.
Crichton was also director of Dorchester Gas Producing Co. with D.H.
founder of the Temco Co. (later LTV), who owned the building to which
the Texas
School Book Depository had moved several months before Kennedy was
killed. Fabian Escalante, translated by Maxine Shaw, edited by Mirta
TheSecret War: CIA Covert Operations against Cuba 1959-62
(Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Ocean Press, 1995), p. 42.
See Peter Dale Scott, The Dallas Conspiracy, chapter III, p. 37
in Bartholomew, p. 71).
In Germany Schmidt had lived with Dr. Wilhelm Kuetemeyer, a professor
of psychosomatic medicine at the University of Heidelberg.
Kuetemeyer conducted experiments on schizophrenics. His work
was interrupted when he became involved in the July 20 plot to
kill Adolph Hitler. See Edward J. Epstein, Legend: The
Secret World of Lee Harvey Oswald (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978), pp.
203-05. Schmidt shared a room in the house with the Magnolia
employees who gave the party at Schmidt's request where Oswald met
Michael Paine. Schmidt was also studying Russian at Magnolia with
Mamantov, who worked as a geologist for Sun Oil Co. Mamantov
was acquainted also with George Bush, who wrote to Mamantov's
wife after his death stating, "We did it!"
See Dick Russell, The Man who Knew Too Much.
See Peter Dale Scott, Crime and Cover-Up, p. 66.
Marrs, Crossfire, p. 278-9.
Gaeton Fonzi, The Last Investigation (New York: Thunder Mouth
Press, 1993), p.190.
Priscilla Johnson McMillan, Marina and Lee (Harper & Row, 1976), p.
Ibid., p. 219. Ibid. The quoted passage does not identify which
of the Humble Oil
founders was DeMohrenschildt's friend, but it is known that his UT
roommate, Hines Baker did later become chairman of Humble Oil.
McMillan revealed that
DeMohrenschildt was also friendly with H. L. Hunt, Clint Murchison,
John Mecom, Robert Kerr and Jean De Menil of Schlumberger.
According to Jim Marrs' interviews with Jeanne DeMohrenschildt after
husband's death, George was making regular trips to Houston from
during 1962-63 on oil business with Mecom and De Menil. George's
Russian friends in the Tolstoy Foundation told Marrs that he was
going to Houston to see George and Herman Brown (Crossfire, p. 282.)
Peter Dale Scott, Crime and Cover-up, p. 34
Buckley Sr., a Texan, as an undergraduate lived in the same upper
class dorm
at the University of Texas at Austin where DeMohrenschildt, brothers
Rex G. Baker and Hines Baker (who W.S. Farish, Sr. later hired as
attorneys and top management for Humble Oil) lived when they were
at UT. See Richard Bartholomew, Possible Discovery of an
Automobile Used in the JFK Conspiracy (the Nash Rambler)
--unpublished manuscript, pp. 63, 88-89. Engdahl, p.
Notice: TGS HiddenMysteries and/or the donor of this material may or
not agree with all the data or conclusions of this data. It is
here 'as is' for your benefit and research. Material for these pages
sent from around the world. If by chance there is a copyrighted
posted which the author does not want read, email the webmaster and it
will be removed. If proper credit for authorship is not noted please
email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.


Skull and Bones


Hitler, Thule, Bush family, Skull and Bones
by reader Wednesday, May. 10, 2006 at 8:12 PM

get to the truth about Skull and Bones, Prescott Bush's stealing Geronomoe's skull and taking it back to Yale Neither President Bush nor John Kerry would comment on it on Meet the Press just its secret

Which can be seen toward the end of this video  http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3891535120990840079&q=who+contro ls+the+world

Bush's base would flip if they read the below info on Skull and Bones:

 http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/uspresidentasmasonspt3.ht m SATANIC ACTIVITIES OF SECRET SOCIETIES

(Radio Show Transcript Follows)

The New World Order is coming Are you ready? Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again. FOR THE NEXT 30 MINUTES, YOU WILL BE ON


This is David Bay, Director of Old Paths Ministries.

And this is the Cutting Edge, a radio program dedicated to warning and informing God's people. We are committed to the study and exposition of the inerrant, inspired and authoritative Word of God. The views expressed belong to us, and are not necessarily shared by this station.

Our society is deteriorating, and Bible-believing Christians are ill-prepared to face that deterioration. This radio program is dedicated to preparing God's people to meet the challenges of the Day, and to encourage obedience to the Word of God in being separated from worldliness and false doctrine.

The moral bankruptcy of our society is well-documented.

Few people understand why we have become morally bankrupt. However, when we look at society through the eyes of God, through the Bible, we can easily see why we are facing the unprecedented troubles today. This study of America through the eyes of God is what we will always do try to here; stay with us for some eye-opening truths.

In past programs, we have stated that the New World Order could not have been realized had it not been for the intense activities of various secret societies throughout the world. We have mentioned one world-wide secret society, the Brotherhood Of Death Society, whose symbol is the skull with two crossed bones. The German Brotherhood of Death Society is the Thule Society. Adolf Hitler joined this society in 1919, becoming an adept under the leadership of Dietrich Eckhart. Later, the Thule Society selected Hitler to be their leader of the New World Order, as Eckhart revealed on his deathbed, saying, "Follow Hitler; he will dance, but it is I who have called the tune. I have initiated him into the Secret Doctrine, opened his centers in vision, and given him the means to communicate with the powers." (Trevor Ravenscroft, The Spear Of Destiny, p. 91).

In August, 1990, President George Bush announced that the world had now entered into a New World Order. Shockingly President Bush is an adept in an American Brotherhood of Death Society, the Yale Skull and Bones Society. As we stated earlier, Bush's New World Order is virtually identical with Hitler's; the key connecting point is the common membership in their respective Brotherhood of Death Societies (Bill Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse, p. 81; plus Antony Sutton, Introduction To The Order, p.7).

We will study this connection in depth today. Let us begin with a quick overview of the Thule Society, beginning with a study of its practices and relevant history.

* They were Satanists who practiced Black Magic -- this means that they were "solely concerned with raising their consciousness by means of rituals to awareness of evil and nonhuman intelligences in the universe; and with achieving means of communication with these intelligences." (Ravenscroft, p. 161). Concentrate on that seemingly innocent word, rituals. Christians equate a ritual to a church service, thereby not understanding its occultic mean-ing. The New Age Dictionary defines ritual as a "ceremony to restore balance with nature...and bring back lost harmony and sacredness." Remember we are dealing with the Satanic world, where good is called evil and evil good. The sacred-ness mentioned here is a Satanic sacredness. Rituals literally are proscribed activities designed to allow demonic power to flow through the participants. These activities are proscribed chants, formula wordings, and carefully planned actions. As we noted last week, the effect is devastatingly powerful, as demonic force pours through the participants, delivering a counterfeit spiritual experience which literally transforms their lives. Never skip over the word ritual, as it is a word of Satanic power.

* Thule members practiced a form of Sexual Magic derived from a lodge of which Aleister Crowley was a member. Crowley was recognized as the foremost worshipper of Satan in the 19th Century. "The origin of this...medieval magic...can be traced to a Freemason, Robert Little, who founded the Societas Rosicruciana in 1865... (Ravenscroft, Spear of Destiny, p. 164-5). While the actual sexual perversions which were practiced are too offensive to share, the results are not. Author Revenscroft stated that "indulgence in the most sadistic rituals awakened penetrating vision into the workings of Evil Intelligences and bestowed phenomenal magical powers." (Ibid. p. 167). This is the Thule Society.

Ravenscroft records its effect upon Hitler, "...sexual perversion took a central place in [Hitler's] life...a monstrous sexual perversion was the very core of his whole existence, the source of his mediumistic and clairvoyant powers, and the motivation behind every act through which he reaped a sadistic vengeance on humanity." (Ibid., p. 171).

Eckart's final act was to initiate Hitler into "a monstrous sadistic magic ritual...after which he was sexually impotent. Hitler's impotency had a deep psycholo-gical foundation. He knew sexual fulfillment through the extremes of sadism and masochism..."(Ravenscroft, p. 155, 173). This impotency delivered a final devastating blow to Hitler's psychological foundation, finally making him into the sadistic murderer that history knows.

Thule society believed in "communication with a hierarchy of Supermen -- The Secret Chiefs of the Third Order". (Ibid) The quality which make these beings supermen was occultic spirituality. Further, they believed in Madame Blavasky's Secret Doctrine, which teaches that certain superman had survived the destruction of Atlantis with their higher levels of consciousness intact. These supermen were Aryans. These two beliefs combined into one through the Thule Society and Hitler, culminating into the Nazi Death Camps. (Ibid, p. 166). When one group of people incorporate into their spiritual belief structure that they are inherently superior to another group of people, it is inevitable that genocide will be attempted as soon as possible. The Thule Society regularly held occultic seances, during which time they communicated with demons who were either masquerading as a dead person or who were just appearing as their guiding spirits. Dietrich Eckart, Alfred Rosenberg, and Adolf Hitler invoked the Anti-Christ into manifestation at the mediumistic seances of the Thule Group in Munich." (Ravenscroft, Spear of Destiny, p. 168) Eckert believed he had been told by his guiding spirit he would have the privilege of training the coming Great One, the Anti-Christ. From the beginning of their association, Eckert believed Hitler was Anti-Christ. Therefore, Eckert spared no occultic knowledge, ritual, or perversion in his attempt to fully equip Hitler for the role. Once the training was completed, Hitler believed he was "born anew with that super-personal strength and resolution he would need to fulfill the mandate ... ordained for him." (p. Ravenscroft, p. 93-4) Hitler literally equated this with the Christian claim to be born again. Now, let us look at the Skull and Bones rituals and beliefs. Little is firmly known about Skull and Bones, because their secrecy since they were established in 1833 is as complete as any society in the world. However, they possess all the requirements of a true secret society.

They were formed in secret and all their activities are carried out secretly. Membership is by invitation only. Potential members are carefully screened as to suitability before they are invited to join. The first night of the new member, who is called an initiate, is critically important. The initiate swears total obedience and loyalty to the secret society. This pledge is bound by serious oaths, some of whom would be deadly if actually carried out. The first night is also critically important as it bounds the initiate to the society by means of ritual, oaths, and confessions. The Skull and Bones also incorporates sexual activities into their practices. "The death of the initiate will be as frightful as the use of human skeletons and ritual psychology can make it..." (Esquire Magazine, "The Last Secrets of Skull and Bones", Ron Rosenbaum, p. 89). Sexual perversion is part of ritual psychology. Ron Rosenbaum, author of the Esquire Magazine article, stated that on initiation night, called tap night, "...if one could climb to the tower of Weir Hall, the odd castle that overlooks the Bones courtyard, one could hear strange cries and moans coming from the bowels of the tomb as the 15 newly tapped members were put through what sounded like a harrowing ordeal..." (Esquire, September, 1976, p. 86).

Further,[initiates] "lay naked in coffins and tell their deepest and darkest sexual secrets as part of their initiation." (Esquire, p. 85). These experiences in the coffins incorporated sexual pain and resulted in being born-again, into the Order, as we mentioned above. (Cooper, p.95) Powerful force charges through the participants of these ceremonies, transforming their lives dramatically. This type ritual is classic Satanism. Anton LaVey states, in his book The Satanic Rituals: Companion To The Satanic Bible, (p. 57)

"The ceremony of rebirth takes place in a large coffin..This is similar to the coffin symbolism that...is found in most lodge rituals." Make no mistake about it: Any organization which utilizes this coffin ritual to simulate rebirth is practising Satanism, including Skull and Bones.

The Skull and Bones believes that on the night of initiation, the initiate "dies to the world and be born again into the Order..." (Esquire Magazine, September, 1977, p. 89). Remember Hitler's belief that he had been born anew after his ritualistic initiation and training? This term is a common one in occultism. During the 1988 Presidential Campaign, a TV reporter asked Vice-President Bush if he were a Christian. Bush initially stammered, but then said, "if you mean born again, then, yes, I am a Christian". Now we know what George Bush meant by his deliberately misleading statement.

As born-again Christians carry out the ritual of water baptism by immersion to demonstrate that they have died to the old way of life and have been reborn into a new life, the occultists have their ritual to demonstrate the same life transformation. Rosenbaum continues his expose' of the born-again experience, "then it's into the coffin and off on a symbolic journey through the underworld to rebirth, which takes place in room number 322. There, the Order clothes the newborn knight in its own special garments, implying that, henceforth, he will tailor himself to the Order's mission." (Ibid., p. 89, 148). This ritual description is as occultic as any I have read, and truly reveals the Skull and Bones as occultic.

One of the most sobering facets of this counterfeit born again initiation ritual is that the initiate swears to an allegiance to the Secret Order that transcends any allegiance later in life. New Age author Bill Cooper captures this disturbing fact most succinctly, "...Members of the Order (Skull and Bones) take an oath that absolves them from any allegiance to any nation or king or government or constitution, and that includes the negating of any subsequent oath which they may be required to take. They swear allegiance only to the Order and its goal of a New World Order...according to the oath Bush took when he was initiated into Skull and Bones, his oath of office as President of the United States means nothing." (Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse, p. 81-82). Since the oath as President occurred after the Oath to Skull and Bones, it is not worth the paper on which it is printed. That kind of hold is powerful. Indeed, as Ron Rosenbaum began the research necessary to write his article for Esquire, he was warned about the power of Skull and Bones. "The power of Bones is incredible. They have their hands on every lever of power in the country."

The only thing which is important to the Skull and Bones is their goal of a New World Order. In conjunction with this understanding, remember one other Secret Society belief, i.e., the ends justify the means.

As Rosenbaum continued his research, he found definite links between Bones and the Bavarian Illuminists. The Bavarian Illuminists were part of the original Masters of the Illuminati. First, Rosenbaum discovered documents which detailed the origins of Bones back to Germany. These documents stated, "Bones is a chapter of a corps of a German University..." The document described at length its relationship with this German Secret Society (the Thule Society) which lead to the founding of the Skull and Bones in 1832.

Secondly, Rosenbaum discovered that, "above the arched walls above the vault of the (Bones) sacred room, #322", is a painting of skulls surrounded by Masonic symbols. Above this painting is the slogan, in German, which means, "Who is the fool, who the wise man, beggar, or king? Whether poor or rich, all's the same in death." This means that only the works which one does in this life is what matters; in death, all men share the same fate. This statement is very consis-tent with the teachings of Secret Societies, showing their Works-oriented philosophy.

Thirdly, Rosenbaum discovered a "haunting photograph of the altar room at one of the Masonic lodges at Nuremburg that is closely associated with Illuminism. Haunting because at the altar room's center, approached through an aisle of hanging human skeletons, is a coffin surmounted by...a skull and crossed bones that look exactly like the particular arrangement of jawbones and thighbones in the official Bones emblem. {Finally}, the skull and crossbones was the official crest of another key Illuminist lodge..." (Esquire, p.88). It is shocking also when we realize that German Nazi death camp guards wore this emblem of Skull and Bones on the shoulders of their uniforms.

Without doubt, we have established Skull and Bones to be a Brotherhood of Death Society, which is itself tied into the Masters of the Illuminati. It is no wonder that Bush has been proclaiming the New World Order.

RESULTS We have studied the common philosophical and religious links between the German Thule Society and Skull and Bones. We now need to study the historical results of the attempt of the Thule Society to establish a New World Order. After the Thule Society selected Adolf Hitler to be their leader of the New World Order, they faced the problem of practical implementation of this goal. They realized that their plans for world domination required control of military power of Germany; however, the military is controlled by those holding political power, and Germany was a democracy. Therefore, the Thule Society created the Nazi Party. The Guiding Spirits of the Thule Society became the Guiding Spirits of the Nazi Party. In only 10 tumultuous years, Hitler gained high political office, from which he catapulted himself into the position of absolute dictator in 1933. In 1938, Hitler began the Final Solution of the Jewish problem by initiating the Holocaust. In 1939, Hitler initiated World War II, which lasted until Mid-1945. As I read the results, remember James' words, "Then the evil desire, when it has conceived, gives birth to sin, and sin, when it is fully matured, brings forth death." By 1945, the occultic sin conceived by the Thule Society had come to full completion. These are the results: (Source is The Webster Family Encyclopedia, Volume 19, 1984, p. 492-3)

* Enormous armies were mobilized around the world.

Russia 12,500,000 men America 12,400,000 men Germany 10,000,000 men Japan 6,000,000 men France 5,000,000 men Britain 4,700,000 men Italy 4,000,000 men China 3,800,000 men Canada 1,100,000 men Total World-Wide Mobilization: 59,500,000 men

The death toll was almost incomprehensible.

1. Russia 10,000,000 soldiers

10,000,000 civilians

2. Germany 3,000,000 soldiers

500,000 civilians

3. Japan 2,000,000 soldiers

500,000 civilians

4. Italy 330,000 soldiers

80,000 civilian

5. Britain 350,000 soldiers

60,000 civilian

6. France 200,000 soldiers

200,000 civilian

7. China 1,300,000 soldiers

(no estimate on civilian deaths)

8. Poland 600,000 soldiers

5,000,000 civilians

9. America 390,000 soldiers

(negligible civilian deaths)

Total human lives killed was:

18,200,000 soldiers and 16,300,000 civilians for 34,000,000 total deaths. When you add 18,000,000 deaths from Hitler's Death Camps, you realize that over 54 million people lost their lives as the final result of the occultic practices and goals of the New World Order of that German Brotherhood of Death Society, the Thule Society. The 6,000,000 Jewish deaths from Hitler's Final Solution represented two-thirds of the total world-wide Jewish population.

Hitler came close to winning WWII, but God's timing was not yet come. However, some of the after-effects of WWII served to set the stage for the current drive toward the New World Order.

Alice Bailey states in her book, The Externalisation of the Hierarchy, that the world must be united regionally before it can be united into one. Stalin repeated this concept shortly before his death in 1953. World War II certainly provided the impetus for this type reorganization. The World was reorganized militarily into NATO in Europe, the Warsaw Pact in Eastern Europe, and SEATO in Asia. Economic regionalization also occurred along approximately the same lines. Repeated cultural, economic, and religious regionalizations have been created since WWII.

The infant One-World Government was created as the United Nations, in 1948. A similar effort was orchestrated after WWI as the League of Nations, but was defeated. One of the first actions of the United Nations was to create the nation of Israel, thus fulfilling God's prophecies to return her back to her Promised Land in the Last Days. Tremendous technological progress was achieved under the impetus of war. The atomic bomb was created, as were the jet engine, the rocket, and modern telecommunications. New Age author, Allen Neuharth, in his book, Nearly One World, states that these inventions have brought the world to the threshold of a One-World Government, Economy, and Religion, i.e., the New World Order. This brief review of the after-effects of WWII clearly shows much was achieved that set the stage for the current New World Order. Let us now review some of the goals which Secret Societies today have for the New World Order. Keep in mind that the Skull and Bones is the driving force and is the "first among equals" among all other Secret Societies and all other open organizations which are committed to this new order.

One World Government -- the only answer to man's problems. One World Economy One World Religion -- Man's evil actions historically are ascribed to his divisions into many different religions. Therefore, much emphasis is being laid on the re-uniting into one religion. The current Ecumenical Move-ment is leading the charge toward this all-important goal. In a seminar held in Boston in August, 1991, the current New England Director of the Theosophical Society stated that, at the proper moment in world history the Roman Catholic Pope would travel to Jerusalem to address a world-wide religious conference. In his speech, he would declare all the world's religions to be united into One. Thus, Alice Bailey's Plan, stated almost 50 years ago, would be realized, i.e., that the Great One would reinstate the Ancient Mysteries Religion as the New World Order Religion. "These Mysteries, when restored, will unify all faiths." (Externalisation of the Hierarchy, p. 573, written in 1946). One of the most basic plans after the New World Order is established is to reduce the world's population from its present 6 billion to 2 billion by the year 2,000 (Constance Cumbey, Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow). Thus, birth control and abortion were early identified as necessary to begin reducing population. Our current emphasis on man's devastating effects upon the earth and upon Global Warming and pollution are designed to convince people that only united, drastic action from the United Nations can save this planet from collapse.

However, the year 2,000 is only a few short years away. How can this drastic reduction be achieved within this short time frame? The basic answer is war.

Bailey, in her book, The Externalisation of the Hierarchy, p. 548, states that the atomic bomb will be turned over to the One-World Government and will be used against any nation who refuses to go along with the New World Order. Bill Cooper, in his book, Behold A Pale Horse, quotes a document from the Bilderberg Secret Society, which is an offshoot of Skull and Bones. "Since most of the general public will not exercise [economic] restraint...[we must] take control of the world by the use of economic silent weapons in a form of quiet warfare and reduce [the dangerous levels of consumption] of the world to a safe level by a process of benevolent slavery and genocide." (p. 49). How could anyone ever think of slavery and genocide as being benevolent? This was the precise thinking of Hitler as he was planning his New World Order. He was going to rid the world of all the undesirables by benevolent warfare. We reviewed the horrible results in the beginning of the pro-gram; however, these figures pale in comparison with the deaths of 4 billion people. At this point, you may protest that the drive to the New World Order is being achieved peacefully. This is true, and when it is fully achieved will fulfill Biblical prophecy which states "When people are saying 'All is well and secure' and 'There is peace and safety', then in a moment, unforeseen destruction, ruin and death shall come upon them and no one shall escape." (1 Thess 5:3).

Further, these plans, if carried out, will also fulfill Biblical prophecy in Revelation 6:4, "And another horse came out flaming red. And its rider was empowered to take peace from the earth, so that men slaughtered one another, and he was given a huge sword."

Thus, we see that the New World Order goals of the Secret Societies, chief of which is Skull and Bones, when completed, would fulfill many Biblical Prophecies.

The time is really very short.

The Skull and Bones Of A "New World Order"




To Assist Mr Bush and Mr Cheney was Mr Rumsfeld:

The Defense Department considers the Internet to be dangerous. That way if completely censored you'll only have TV Corporate Media to tell you news. Take for instance the Video the Media are using to "settle the attack on the Pentagon. Uoi watched it and said, these conspiracy theorists are nuts. Sure there's the Jetliner.

Well if you take a look at

Video at Pentagon: I see an incoming police car. I see in video one what appears to be a nose with wings appearing at the right.I let my mouse stay on it as the video played. It barely moved. Then I saw what appeared to be an ammazingly fast cylindrical object slam into the Pentagon and resulting fireball blast. My mouse was still positioned on a nose and wing after the explosion at the far upper right.Then it appears that the nose and wing blends into the skyline.

Video 2 I see what appears to be at the far right of the screen. a nose and wing . I see it right above the incoming police car. Then I see what appears to be a smaller object with a clearly defined triangular nose, under it slamming into the Pentagon.Later I see a white van coming in under the same nose and wing.

 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/339490.shtml Media abuzz with release of pentagon 911 video

What do you see?

This is Judicial Watch's slowed down version. Remember they had to fight to get this released from the government. Yet this is not being shown on YV Media.

Hear [seattle.indymedia.org]

Posted by RESE 05/18/2006 @ 05:48am | ignore this person

THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS:  http://www.public-action.com/



Just a snip: Note: At the time this article was published, all external links were alive and functioning. But the Internet is a dynamic forum. Webmasters sometimes change or remove pages, and entire web sites sometimes disappear. Whenever practicable, we have cached copies of the originals.

Pentagon RESCUE? Open, Bloody, Questions . . . (Parts I through IV of a five-part article.) (For Part V, see: The Seven Minute Fire)

by Carol A. Valentine President, Public Action, Inc.  http://www.public-action.com/ Copyright, June, 2002 May be reproduced for non-commercial purposes "There cannot be any survivors; it just would be beyond comprehension." -- Donald Rumsfeld, US Secretary of Defense, speaking of missing Pentagon personnel on September 11, 2001 -- just nine hours after impact.


Remember Rumsfeld's words on September 11: "There cannot be any survivors; it just would be beyond comprehension."

So Rumsfeld's predictions came true. After the first round of victims escaped, there were no more survivors . . . He's quite a clairvoyant, isn't he? What are the statistical chances of Rumsfeld being 100% right in circumstances like those?

DARIN PONTELL CALLS HOME FROM THE GRAVE According to the Washington Post, January 20, 2002, "The Last Watch," (front page, Style section), the entire chain of command of the super secret Chief of Naval Operations Intelligence Plot (CNO-IP) were killed in the September 11 attack on the Pentagon.

One of the victims was Darin Pontell, who worked in CNO-IP. The Post reported that two days after the attack, Darin's parents were still hoping Darin was alive. Here is an excerpt from "The Last Watch," Washington Post, January 20, 2001, pg.F1. "'Where'd I put my cell phone? Where is it?' Marilyn Pontell, Darrin's mother, grew frantic looking for her purse. Her Nokia was chiming 'Take Me Out to the Ball Game.' "Marilyn would be sick if she missed that call. Maybe it was news about her son. maybe it was Darin himself.

"Two days later, Marilyn and Gary Pontell still hoped their youngest boy had been spared. Gathered at Darin and Devora's apartment in Gaithersburg on Thursday afternoon, they could barely process the idea that he was dead . . .

"Navy officials gave garbled reports: One person said someone who looked like Darin walked from the scene. Somebody else claimed he was working far away, in the A-Ring. An officials said they couldn't find his Acura Integra in the Pentagon lot . . .

"The Nokia sang again, then silence. Too late. when she finally got to the phone, Marilyn scrolled through the menu. One missed call: 1:57 p.m. No message. But the incoming number was clearly identified. It was Darin's.

"My God, maybe he was alive.

"For five more days, they waited. On Sept. 18, the Navy informed the Pontells that Darin's body had been positively identified. His cell phone was never returned to the family. They presume it was never found. Perhaps the flip-phone had somehow dialed Marilyn's number when the rubble shifted. But didn't all cell phones have to be turned off upon entry into the CNO-IP [Chief of Naval Operations Intelligence Plot]?

"The FBI offered a one-word explanation for that call: 'anomaly.'"


If you don't care then you may be their next victim.

 http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/253128.shtml Judicial watch's Video of attack on Pentagon

here [seattle.indymedia.org]

Of course the corporations are siding with the military! Let's not forget that years ago the CIA was only supposed to operate on foreign soil, but today with the Patriot Act it may operate on American soil, So can the Mossad.

Both are trained to be killers, in secret, without the use of habeas corpus.

They were operating illegally on American soil, when President John F. Kennedy was assassinated. See the proof at click on Posada on the left margin [jfkmurdersolved.com]  http://jfkmurdersolved.com/buy2.htm The proof that was not contested, there was a whole group of them, under Posada's control, was given in a civil suit of Hunt, by Marita Lorenzo, who said Frank Sturgis said "We killed Kennedy, very professional" This article tells why the same people involved in the Kennedy assassination are in control, and were responsible for the 911 attack on our country.

Will You be the next TARGET of our own corrupted Government? [miami.indymedia.org]

Go Back and Read Rebuilding America's Defenses See the explicit warning of the Military: the internet is dangerous. Yes, for exposing Great Treason you bet.

add a comment on this article

The Fourth Traitor: DEVIL in Russian
Posted by: Reader at May 20, 2006 06:46
Mr. Michael Chertoff= Devil in Russian

Yesterday Bush made nine recess appoinments. One of them is Julie L.Myers. She was made head of
Immigration And Customs Enforcement Bureau at the Department of Homeland Security.
She's Chertoff's wife. Nice . She is also the niece of former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Richard B. Myers.
Thats what I call "Bringing homeland the bacon.
By the way. Is it me or does this guy look like the Crypt keepers younger brother?

The hypocrisy of democrats never ceases to amaze. They are always calling for resignations. How about this... I, insane Chuck, call for Senator Reid's resignation because he accepted money from an Abramoff associate.


You do the math...these are the facts:

1993 WTC Bombing

The FBI planted and paid Emad A. Salem in New York and New Jersey to act as an agent provocateur, to recruit, organize and encourage Muslims to bomb the World Trade Center (WTC) in 1993. From March through June 1993 Mr. Salem recruited seven Muslims from the Abu Bakr mosque in Brooklyn and the al-Salaam mosque in Jersey City, where the Muslim cleric Sheik Abdel Rahman preached to incite violence in his terrorist cell. Salem had known Rahman from Egypt. Salem used the seven men to scout targets, plan tactics and obtain chemicals and parts for bombs. Salem also worked in the operation with a Sudanese man named Siddig Ali who was a follower of Abdel Rahman. The plans of the Salem and Rahman group also included bombings of United Nations headquarters in Manhattan and several other buildings, bridges and tunnels in New York

The FBI supplied a safe house for Salem's group in Queens. At the WTC trial US prosecutors and attorneys acknowledged Mr. Salem's role in organizing the safe house activities, but told the jury "he was merely providing an opportunity" to people who already wanted to commit crimes. According to tapes played at the trial, the FBI and US Attorneys clearly were shown to have intentionally used Salem as a provocateur.

Michael Chertoff was the US Attorney appointed by HW Bush and retained by Bill Clinton for New Jersey from 1990-1994. As US Attorney for New Jersey Chertoff was deeply involved with the 1993 WTC bombing sting operation using FBI monitoring of the Abdel Rahman and Salem's recruited cell members at the Al Salaam mosque in Jersey City. The US Attorney from New York who worked with Chertoff to prosecute the 1993 WTC bombing case was Patrick Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald is also conducting the federal grand jury investigating the illegal outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame, the wife of Ambassador Wilson who investigated claims of uranium acquisition by Iraq. Chertoff and Fitzgerald were fully aware of the statements made by prosecutors admitting that the FBI intentionally had provided the safe house for Salem terrorist recruits.

Federal trial testimony and tapes revealed that when Salem was asked to assemble the bomb for the WTC, Salem went to the FBI to ask that harmless powder be used to avoid deaths. But FBI and US Attorneys involved essentially cut Salem off and the WTC was bombed killing people in 1993. Testimony by two of Salem's FBI agent handlers, Mr. Anticev, and Mrs. Nancy Floyd, confirmed that their FBI supervisors intentionally refused the agents and Salem's pleas to render the WTC bomb harmless.

Three years after the 1993 WTC bombing, Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, who prosecutors said helped mastermind the 1993 bombing, was also convicted. Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, Yousef's uncle and an engineer trained in the US, was named by the FBI and DOJ as another mastermind of the 1993 WTC bombing and the 9-11 attacks. There is evidence known to the FBI and Chertoff that also shows Khalid Mohammed was behind the planning for the OKC bombing with Terry Nichols. Khalid Mohammed was captured in 2003 in Pakistan. Khalid has since been tortured by the CIA with methods reviewed by Alberto Gonzales and Michael Chertoff at DOJ, according to published statements by US authorities, to extract details of Khalid's role in the 1993 WTC and OKC bombings as well as being the architect for the 9-11 attacks.

Three of the men Salem recruited at the Brooklyn Abu Bakr mosque were allowed by the FBI and US Attorneys to go free and roam the streets. They were Anas and Asad Siddiqy and Mohamed Chafti. They later were seen very close to the OKC bombing in April 1995 with Timothy McVeigh. These three men were arrested on the day of the OKC bombing and then released after intervention by the FBI, DOJ and CIA. The FBI 302 reports of their arrest were kept hidden from the public in the office of FBI OKC bomb task force inspector Danny Defenbaugh until the reports were found and released in early 2001. The witness to the three men in OKC being with McVeigh, Debbie Burdick, was intimidated and coerced by FBI agent Odom to not talk about her eyewitness account during and after OKC bombing federal trials. FBI agent Odom was working with DOJ prosecutors in Denver at the federal trials of McVeigh and Nichols when Odom called Burdick.

It seems that Khalid Mohammed and Ramzi Yousef had kept in contact with the Siddiqys because a letter from Khalid to the Siddiqys was found on Ramzi's computer when confiscated by the FBI and CIA in the Philippines in January 1995. Plans for the OKC bombing and the 9-11 style attacks were also found on the same computer shortly after Khalid and Ramzi had met in the Philippines with the other OKC bombing participant, Terry Nichols.

Former Egyptian army sergeant Ali Mohammed was captured and tried in 1998 for his role in the 1993 WTC and the Tanzanian and Kenyan embassy bombings. Ali Mohammed trained the Middle Eastern recruits of the FBI and Chertoff's provocateu, Emad Salem, in bomb making and planting skills for the 1993 WTC bombing. When finally arrested Ali Mohammed was carrying training manuals on how to build and plant bombs in public buildings. Ali Mohammed has also written training manuals along with Mohammed Atef for bin Laden and AlQaeda.

Ali Mohammed worked for US Special Forces, the CIA and then the FBI all while Ali was close to bin Laden and Dr. Ayman Zawahiri and Khalid Mohammed. In fact with the knowledge of the FBI, Ali Mohammed squired Zawahiri and Khalid around the US and in Oklahoma City in March­April 1995 to survey terror targets and set up terror underground networks.

Although convicted, the details of Ali Mohammed's plea bargain and detention arrangements with Attorney General Reno are still secret. Ali Mohammed knows a great deal about US sting operations of the FBI, the CIA and US attorneys.

Chertoff was directly involved in the prosecution of the Moussaoui case and sought to limit the testimony of AlQaeda leaders, bin Alshibh and Khalid Mohammed to such an extent that the federal judge in the case threatened to throw out the case and moved to severely restrict if not kill the government's continuance of the case. Chertoff may have sought to limit the testimony of Khalid Mohammed in the Moussaoui case in part because of torture of Khalid ratified by DOJ attorneys but also because Khalid would be in a position to describe facts pointing to FBI and DOJ foreknowledge information of the 1993 WTC, the OKC and the 9-11 attacks. Chertoff handled the appeal of the DOJ case against Moussaoui in the 4th Circuit court of Appeals now before the Supreme Court. Chertoff with Ashcroft's and now Alberto Gonzales' help may likewise be trying to stifle this type of information from coming out in the Rahman case by the wiretapping and indictment of Lynne Stewart.

Since Chertoff was the US attorney in New Jersey fully aware of FBI monitoring of Rahman's cell with informants and at a mosque in New Jersey, it is entirely possible that even Chertoff would not want incriminating information brought out by Lynne Stewart in Rahman's trial. The complete story of the roles of Chertoff and Fitzgerald and other US Attorneys with Ali Mohammed, Emad Salem, Yasin, the Siddiqys, Chafti, Melvin Lattimore, and others is one that the DOJ, FBI and Chertoff, Ashcroft and now Gonzales do not want exposed in a federal trial of Rahman represented by Lynne Stewart.

Protecting Terror Financiers and Nuclear Arms Traffickers

Dr. Magdy Elamir, a prominent Egyptian neurologist from Jersey City, was sued by New Jersey for skimming over $16 million from an HMO he operated.

According to a June 20, 2000 article in "The Record" of Bergen County, New Jersey, Michael Chertoff was the defense attorney for Dr. Magdy Elamir.

The lawsuit alleged that Dr. Elamir "caused more than $5.7 million to be paid by wire transfers to unknown parties where the beneficial owner of the account is unknown."

An August 2002 Dateline NBC reported that bin Laden funded the HMO owned by Dr Elamir and the money skimmed from the HMO by Dr. Elamir was transferred overseas to fund bin Laden terror activities. The Dateline story was based on intelligence documents furnished by the chairman of the House International Relations Committee Ben Gilman, R-New York. Dr. Elamir also funded the Jersey City Al Salaam mosque led by Muslim cleric Abdel Rahman and his terror cell who helped carry out the 1993 WTC bombing. Recall that while US attorney for New Jersey from 1990 to 1994 Michael Chertoff knew of the FBI use of Emad Salem as a provocateur associated with the Al Salaam mosque and Abdel Rahman.

After Michael Chertoff took over the DOJ criminal division in June 2001, no DOJ charges were filed against Dr. Magdy Elamir or Mohamed Elamir for their role in trying to buy nuclear weapons for bin Laden in New Jersey. There also was no adequate effort made to apprehend the Pakistani ISI agent Raja Abbas. Because the Diamondback case was handled as a criminal case rather than a counter terrorism case, Chertoff was also in a position to control and limit prosecution and arrests in the Diamondback case so that Magdy Elamir and Mohamed Elamir would not be charged or go to trial.

Dr. Magdy Elamir has not been arrested by the FBI nor charged or prosecuted by the DOJ under Chertoff even though the intelligence documents provided by Congressmen Gilman show that Dr. Elamir funneled millions of dollars from fraudulent HMO and MRI companies to fund terrorist activities for cleric Abdel Rahman in the 1993 bombing and also for bin Laden.

9-11 Drugs, Arms Trafficking and Terror Funding

Attorney General Ashcroft put Chertoff in charge of the entire DOJ investigation of the 9-11 attacks. Chertoff may well have known of the connections of Mohamed Elamir Atta, Mohamed Elamir, and Dr. Magdy Elamir in New Jersey with each other and the 9-11 hijackers, possibly even before the 9-11 attacks.

The New Yorker described Chertoff's role in the 9-11 investigation on November 5, 2001:

"Since the September 11th terrorist attacks, Chertoff's office has become the funnel for what is probably the most important criminal investigation in American history, as prosecutors and F.B.I. investigators pour in to seek the boss's approval. ... For day-to-day decisions, Chertoff has the last word... "

Chertoff and the FBI strongly impeded and obstructed the US Customs and Homeland Security operation Greenquest investigating the Saudi, Ptech and other terror money sources for 9-11. The DOJ, Chertoff and FBI were given control of the Ptech investigation and Greenquest based on the agreement signed by Ridge and Ashcroft. To make doubly sure that nothing is done by the backdoor by Homeland Security to reveal the DOJ and FBI sabotage and cover-up of the Ptech investigation and other Saudi backing of terror finances, Chertoff has now been put in place at Homeland Security to replace Tom Ridge.

Posted by: plunger on January 05, 2006 at 11:37am
Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it]

It also brings to question the hypocrisy of it..Reid would be against the Patriot act and likely Homeland Security..but then squeals when the pork that goes with "what he is against" is taken away. Having said that, I do think that Las Vegas would be a high risk target for attacks. I do not know how they pick the risky cities. I amnot sure losing Wayne Newton is such a bad thing though...
Posted by: beatle on January 05, 2006 at 11:37am
Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it]

For Immediate Release Jun 4, 2003


Judiciary Committee Dodges Responsibility Concerning Former Senate Colleague, Fearing Political Consequences of Honest Investigation

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption and abuse, expressed outrage that the Senate Judiciary Committee and its investigative staff of the Majority and Minority, for being derelict in its duty to conduct a full and complete investigation of Mr. Michael Chertoff, a nominee for the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, and a previous Senate Whitewater Majority Counsel, who is close to senators on the Judiciary Committee. Judicial Watch provided Committee investigators with a detailed chronology of alleged Justice Department misuse of organized crime operatives by the FBI and other U.S. government agencies in the District of New Jersey (among other northeastern U.S. jurisdictions), while Mr. Chertoff served as the U.S. Attorney. The investigators were also provided with a tape of recorded telephone conversations, transcripts, video and public documents as evidence.

During a two hour meeting with Committee investigators on Thursday, May 29, 2003, Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman, and President Tom Fitton, made a detailed presentation, including audio and video exhibits, with direct evidentiary admissions by an FBI crime operative. Messrs. Klayman and Fitton also presented the staff with a recommended witness list of persons with first-hand knowledge of the alleged crimes. Today's joint press statement from Senators Hatch and Leahy confirms that the Senate Judiciary Committee investigators failed to pursue any of the investigative leads or conduct any meaningful interviews in an effort to unravel the controversy surrounding Mr. Chertoff's actions. Indeed, they merely asked Mr. Chertoff if he is "implicated or not." The investigative staff could not possibly have scratched the surface of the evidence presented to it in merely three working days.

"The Committee did a fraudulent investigation of serious allegations concerning Mr. Chertoff. The Senators are going to ram his nomination through the process without doing their duty, because to open up this 'can of worms' would only expose a whole new level of deceit and corruption, that directly touches Hillary Clinton and Justice Department corruption. The Judiciary Committee betrayed its constitutional duty," stated Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman.


Michael Chertoff and the sabotage of the Ptech investigation

 http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/01/michael-chertoff-and-sabot age-of-ptech.html

So now you see the reason for my urgency to expose the entire truth of 9/11. It's the only story that will so outrage the sleeping public.

Given ALL of the corruption that preceeded it, and was swept quietly under the rug, combined with Chertoff's UNANIMOUS (98-0) appointment to become the Dictator of Homeland Security (in spite of his prior wrong doing) - one must assume that ALL of the criminals are in on the same joke. Clearly, this is a joke.

When Chertoff was practically responsible for genocide in New Orleans, what was the consequence?

Remember how Bush rushed out in front of him to take the blame for FEMA and the Department Of Homeland Security?

Why would that be the first time in GW's life that he accepted responsibility for anything that went wrong?

When you think about it, Chertoff appears to be the most powerful man in the world. He can do anything he chooses, and get away with it. Not one Senator or Congressman will stand up to him.


The only Organization in the United States that is feared by EVERYONE who holds political office is AIPAC.

Does he work for AIPAC?

Is there an elephant in the room?
Posted by: plunger on January 05, 2006 at 11:38am
Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it]

I think the pattern is instructive.

In the first WTC bombing, an agent provocateur was utilized to recruit those with a predisposition to commit a profoudly evil act against the US government. The skids were greased to the greatest extent possible to enable them to pull it off.

If the same tactic was used in the OKC bombing, Nichols and McVeigh would simply be of the belief that they pulled off the bombing as they had intended, without a clear understanding of how they managed to get away with it.

Now looking at 9/11, clearly Mossad played the role of agents provocateur (X 200 so-called "Art Students") who mirrored the activities of the would-be hijackers as they went to flight school and prepared to carry out their mission against the US Government.

The pattern is clear. Somebody within the US Government (or those who control the policies and the Defense Department of the US Government) wants these attacks to occur. Peace is simply not profitable. You can't very well go out and take over resource-rich countries to grow your Empire unless you are provoked to attack.

False Flag Terror is at the heart of all of this evil. Who are the False Flag Experts? That's who Chertoff works for.

They're not done yet. Martial law is coming with the "Homeland Event", which will in-turn serve as the pretext for the bombing of Iran by either Israel or The United States - which are now one in the same.  http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-11-chertoff-side_x.htm

Chertoff played key role on 9/11
By Kevin Johnson and Mimi Hall, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — In the minutes after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, while Attorney General John Ashcroft was rushing back from Milwaukee, Michael Chertoff was calling the shots.

Chertoff, then chief of the Justice Department's criminal division, breached the prickly territorial lines that have long divided the Justice Department from the FBI. From a fifth-floor office at FBI headquarters, above the streams of panicked people who flooded Pennsylvania Avenue, he set up shop in the bureau's crisis center. For the next 20 hours, he directed the government's initial response to the most lethal terrorist attack in U.S. history.

Chertoff would spend the next two years serving as a central figure in formulating U.S. anti-terrorism policy — from the effort to secretly detain hundreds of Middle Easterners in the USA, to increasing the FBI's authority to conduct domestic surveillance at religious gatherings and other public events.

Civil rights advocates say Chertoff's record raises serious questions about his fitness for the job. Gregory Nojeim, associate director of the ACLU's Washington legislative office, said Chertoff's tenure at Justice is the most troubling. Chertoff was one of the architects of the USA Patriot Act, which provided law enforcement broader surveillance authority.

"Michael Chertoff's record suggests that he sees the Bill of Rights as an obstacle to national security," Nojeim said. The nomination "should spur a search of his entire record on civil liberties."


The White House and the FBI Killed Operation Greenquest, Michael Chertoff's Faux Search To Track The Funding For 9/11

The strongest pushback came from the Justice Department, where the mention of DHS inspired jokes about duct tape and chartreuse threat levels. Justice officials believed DHS had "too much focus on marketing and not enough on substantive delivery," in the words of one aide to then-Attorney General John D. Ashcroft. "They were consumed with their public perception," said Mark Corallo, an Ashcroft spokesman.

Indeed, one of the new department's biggest intramural furors was a branding fight with the FBI. It began when the director of a new DHS agency known as Immigration and Customs Enforcement -- or ICE -- decided to keep the catchy acronym but change the name to Investigation and Criminal Enforcement. The FBI, it turned out, had some proprietary feelings about the word "investigation."

At the FBI's insistence, the White House had already forced ICE to give up its Operation Greenquest program investigating terrorism financing -- and forced Ridge to sign a memo pledging to keep his department away from similar investigations. But Ridge thought this spat was just silly; nobody was going to mistake ICE for the FBI.

Nevertheless, the White House told Ridge to back off.


Michael Chertoff, appointed by President Bush to head the Homeland Security Department, may have shielded from criminal prosecution a former client suspected by law enforcement of having funneled millions of dollars directly to Osama Bin Laden while in charge of the U.S. Government's 9.11 investigation.

"But in a hint of the gravity of his legal predicament, he was represented in court by Michael Chertoff, the former U.S. attorney in Newark and counsel to U.S. Sen. Alfonse D'Amato's Whitewater investigation." Link

Yes, the soon-to-be Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff represented a known bin Laden operative. Perhaps more troubling, Chertoff also headed the U.S.'s investigation into the September 11th attack. From the New Jersey Law Journal, August 4, 2003:

"The Sept. 11 investigation was supervised by Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff, head of the U.S. Criminal Justice Division, who is now a Third Circuit judge." Link

More on Chertoff from the New Yorker, November 5, 2001:

"Since the September 11th terrorist attacks, Chertoff's office has become the funnel for what is probably the most important criminal investigation in American history, as prosecutors and F.B.I. investigators pour in to seek the boss's approval. What leads can we use from the search of a hijacker's car in Portland, Maine? Where do the hijackers' credit-card records lead?... For day-to-day decisions, Chertoff has the last word"...


Chertoff allowed scores of suspected Israeli terrorists and spies to quietly return to Israel. In several cases, Israeli suspects working for phoney moving companies, such as Urban Moving Systems from Weehawken, N.J., were caught driving moving vans which tested positive for explosives. On September 14, Dominic Suter, the owner of the moving company, which was found to be a Mossad front company, fled to Israel after FBI agents requested a second interview.

One group of 5 Israelis was seen on the roof of Urban Moving Systems videotaping and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center. These Israeli agents were returned to Israel on visa violations.

These Israeli suspects, and others, who had apparently transported explosives in the New York area, were allowed to return to Israel without being properly interrogated or their presence and activities in the United States having been vigorously investigated.


Popular Mechanics magazine probably didn't worry about the ethical considerations of hiring a cousin of Michael Chertoff, a former Assistant Attorney General and the new Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), as senior researcher.

But the March 2005 issue of Popular Mechanics (PM) plumbs new depths of nepotism and Hearst-style "yellow journalism" with its cover story about 9/11. PM's senior researcher, 25-year-old Benjamin Chertoff, authored a propagandistic cover story entitled "Debunking 9/11 Lies" which seeks to discredit all independent 9/11 research that challenges the official version of events.

Benjamin's mother in Pelham, New York, however, was more willing to talk. Asked if Benjamin was related to the new Secretary of Homeland Security, Judy said, "Yes, of course, he is a cousin."


The Assistant Attorney General in charge of criminal investigations at the time was Michael Chertoff, the current head of the Dept. of Homeland Security. Chertoff, the son of the first hostess of Israel's national air carrier, El Al, is thought to be an Israeli national.

One of the Israeli agents later told Israeli radio that they had been sent to "document the event" - the event which took the lives of some 3,000 Americans.

Despite the fact that the Israelis arrested in New Jersey evidently had prior knowledge or were involved in the planning of 9/11, the U.S. mainstream media has never even broached the question of Israeli complicity in the attacks.


ICTS UK Ltd is another Israeli-run 'transportation security' company with offices in London. Although the company's registered address is listed as 8 Baker Street, they operate, however, from an office on the first Floor of Tavistock House South. Curiously, this is the exact same location that Fortress GB operate from. More curious still, Tavistock House is the exact location where the number 30 bus exploded on 7th July.

Given that both companies provide 'transportation security' services, operate from the same floor of the same office complex, and given that both are owned and run by Israelis, only a hardened 'coincidence theorist' would deny that there is evidence indicating tangible links between the two. Indeed, one could be forgiven for believing that the same people are behind Fortress GB Ltd and ICTS UK Ltd.

As Christopher Bollyn points out, these companies merit being investigated because "they provide 'security technology' for the tube lines that were bombed." Bollyn also points out that these Israeli companies perfect their 'security' skills in Israel and Iraq and then apply them in Britain and the USA.

ICTS International were the company who ran the security arrangements at ALL the airports from where the hijacked airliners departed from on the morning of September 11th, 2001.


US Nuclear Weapons Being "Guarded" By Israel

American supporters of Israel were delighted to learn that an Israeli company, Magal Security Systems - owned in part by the government of Israel - is in charge of security for the most sensitive nuclear power and weapons storage facilities in the United States.

The largest perimeter security company in the world, Magal started out as a division of Israeli Aircraft Industries (IAI) - which was owned in part by the government of Israel. In recent years, however, Magal evolved into a publicly-traded company, although IAI (and thus the government of Israel) still holds a substantial share in the highly successful firm.

What all of this means is that the government of Israel will actually have control over the Security of America's nuclear weapons.

And with current U.S. Homeland Security Chief, Michael Chertoff, not only a strong supporter of Israel but also the son of a woman who has strong Israeli ties - even including service with El Al, the national airline of Israel-Magal, owned in party by Israeli Aircraft Industries - will be a clear-cut favorite in the eyes of the power brokers in official Washington who have the power to grant lucrative security contracts.
Can you help me out with a plausible explanation for this:


Here is the link to the official DEA report, which I'm sure you are incapable of reading:


A counterintelligence investigation by the FBI concluded that at least two of them were in fact Mossad operatives, according to the former American official, who said he was regularly briefed on the investigation by two separate law enforcement officials.

"The assessment was that Urban Moving Systems was a front for the Mossad and operatives employed by it," he said. "The conclusion of the FBI was that they were spying on local Arabs but that they could leave because they did not know anything about 9/11."

However, he added, the bureau was "very irritated because it was a case of so-called unilateral espionage, meaning they didn't know about it."

Spokesmen for the FBI, the Justice Department and the Immigration and Naturalization Service refused to discuss the case. Israeli officials flatly dismissed the allegations as untrue.

However, the former American official said that after American authorities confronted Jerusalem on the issue at the end of last year, the Israeli government acknowledged the operation and apologized for not coordinating it with Washington.

The five men -- Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari and Yaron Shmuel -- were arrested eight hours after the attacks by the Bergen County, N.J., police while driving in an Urban Moving Systems van.

'A Scary Situation' Steven Gordon, the attorney for the five Israeli detainees, acknowledged that his clients' actions on Sept. 11 would easily have aroused suspicions. "You got a group of guys that are taking pictures, on top of a roof, of the World Trade Center. They're speaking in a foreign language. They got two passports on 'em. One's got a wad of cash on him, and they got box cutters. Now that's a scary situation."

As for these ultra conspiratorial rags:

Since their arrest, plenty of speculation has swirled about the case, and what the five men were doing that morning. Eventually, The Forward, a respected Jewish newspaper in New York, reported the FBI concluded that two of the men were Israeli intelligence operatives.

Vince Cannistraro, a former chief of operations for counterterrorism with the CIA who is now a consultant for ABCNEWS, said federal authorities' interest in the case was heightened when some of the men's names were found in a search of a national intelligence database.

Israeli Intelligence Connection?

According to Cannistraro, many people in the U.S. intelligence community believed that some of the men arrested were working for Israeli intelligence. Cannistraro said there was speculation as to whether Urban Moving had been "set up or exploited for the purpose of launching an intelligence operation against radical Islamists in the area, particularly in the New Jersey-New York area."

According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:

"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem."

The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives.

The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture.

The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:

American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported.

TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of explosives (13).

What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20, the New York Post, and the New Jersey Bergen Record all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.

But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva), and Yediot America, all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.

It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.

From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.

The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me. These guys were like, "Now America knows what we go through."

A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities.

It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad agents. They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days.

Several of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home.

Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."

How did they know there would be an event to document on 9/11?

It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents

"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report.

In fact, he said, the nature of the investigation changed after the names of two of the five Israelis showed up on a CIA-FBI database of foreign intelligence operatives, he said. At that point, he said, the bureau took control of the investigation and launched a Foreign Counterintelligence Investigation, or FCI.

FBI investigations into possible links to the September 11 attacks are usually carried by the bureau's counterterrorism division, not its counterintelligence division.

"An FCI means not only that it was serious but also that it was handled at a very high level and very tightly," the former official said. That view was echoed by several former FBI officials interviewed.

According to ABCNEWS sources, Israeli and U.S. government officials worked out a deal -- and after 71 days, the five Israelis were taken out of jail, put on a plane, and deported back home.

The men all underwent at least two polygraph tests each, the lawyer added. He said one of the Israelis took the test seven times, a very unusual total according to several polygraph experts interviewed by the Forward. All failed their tests.



Posted by: plunger on January 05, 2006 at 12:11pm
Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it]

While Lay is on the stand and under oath, wouldn't it be great fun to ask him all about his meetings with George Bush Sr. and Dick Cheney prior to 9/11?

Wouldn't it be great to ask him if the faux California Energy Crisis which his company manufactured just prior to the 2000 elections was actually a scheme cooked up by he and Poppie Bush to compel Americans to install some oil experts in the White House? But what was to be Lay's reward? After all, he was GW's largest contributor and best friend of Poppie Bush. Poppie never planned on Enron going bust, and that's when things started to fall apart.

Wouldn't if be nice to learn the details of how Lay and Cheney were divvying up the oil fields in Iraq on a big map, even before 9/11?

Wouldn't it be enlightening to hear that Lay knew for a fact that 9/11 was going to happen as the pretext for the war plan which he clearly had knowledge of prior to 9/11?

Why would you sit around countless energy planning meetings dividing up the oil fields of Iraq in advance of 9/11 unless there were a plan in place to make it possible?

Such a plan would by necessity be a war plan, and this war plan was actually in place prior to 9/11.

Surely any good war plan requires at its core a starting point, a trigger if you will that provides a good "cover story" to implement it. Clearly you can't just go around invading countries without a good reason...you need to be attacked first, then retaliate.

Was 9/11 simply part of the war plan?

Why wouldn't it have been?

You can't hit the "GO" button without a pretext.

9/11 was the pretext for the invasion of the Middle East - all by design.


Remember how it was Andersen Consulting which took the brunt of the legal retribution for the Enron debacle? Michael Chertoff was responsible for that. He put them out of business:

Andersen attorneys thought Chertoff was asking too much and said the firm would be better off going to trial.

Chertoff then warned the Andersen team that if there was a trial, he would play to win. His prosecutors would take "head shots" at Andersen, Chertoff said.


FYI: Taking "head shots" is a term of the Mossad. It is their tactic for dealing with suicide bombers wearing vests. Mossad has taught this same technique to police forces across the United States.

After Andersen's conviction, the government's Enron investigation gains momentum. After Justice Department criminal division chief Michael Chertoff obtained an indictment against Andersen in March, the prosecutor became the target of public demonstrations by Andersen employees. As the firm's employees confronted the reality that the indictment would drive Andersen out of business, they and others demanded to know why Chertoff wasn't going after his principle target, Enron.

Chertoff's obstruction-of-justice indictment of Andersen quickly broke the firm.



Michael Chertoff, appointed by President Bush to head the Homeland Security Department, may have shielded from criminal prosecution a former client suspected by law enforcement of having funneled millions of dollars directly to Osama Bin Laden while in charge of the U.S. Government's 9.11 investigation.

"At the FBI's insistence, the White House had already forced ICE to give up its Operation Greenquest program investigating terrorism financing -- and forced Ridge to sign a memo pledging to keep his department away from similar investigations."


Chertoff allowed scores of suspected Israeli terrorists and spies to quietly return to Israel. In several cases, Israeli suspects working for phoney moving companies, such as Urban Moving Systems from Weehawken, N.J., were caught driving moving vans which tested positive for explosives. On September 14, Dominic Suter, the owner of the moving company, which was found to be a Mossad front company, fled to Israel after FBI agents requested a second interview.

One group of 5 Israelis was seen on the roof of Urban Moving Systems videotaping and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center. These Israeli agents were returned to Israel on visa violations.

ABS 20/20 Investigation:

 link to www.antichristconspiracy.com


FOX News 4-Part Investigative Series:


Popular Mechanics:


Popular Mechanics magazine probably didn't worry about the ethical considerations of hiring a cousin of Michael Chertoff, a former Assistant Attorney General and the new Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), as senior researcher.

But the March 2005 issue of Popular Mechanics (PM) plumbs new depths of nepotism and Hearst-style "yellow journalism" with its cover story about 9/11. PM's senior researcher, 25-year-old Benjamin Chertoff, authored a propagandistic cover story entitled "Debunking 9/11 Lies" which seeks to discredit all independent 9/11 research that challenges the official version of events.


The CEO of Systems Planning's international division, Dov Zakheim, is a long-time DoD and Republican Party insider, and a founding member of the Neoconservative cult. While Bush was still Governor of Texas, Zakheim became one of his closest advisers, counseling him on defense technology and strategic aspects of Middle Eastern affairs. After the 2000 "election," Rummy rewarded Zakheim with a low-profile but strategically important position -- Comptroller, i.e. head money man, of the Defense Department.

Zakheim also co-authored the Heritage Foundation's infamous tract, "Rebuilding America's Defenses," in which the Bush Administration's entire design for renewed global conquest was laid down a full year prior to 9-11. On page 63, the authors note that timely implementation of their ideas would require "some catastrophic and catalyzing event -- like a new Pearl Harbor."

see for yourself:


Dov S. Zakheim was sworn in as the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and Chief Financial Officer for the Department of Defense on May 4, 2001.

Left the Bush Administration in mid-2004 for Booz Allen.

How Does Zakheim Fit In ?

He helped mold the Mid-East policy, and controlled the Pentagon purse strings.

Thanks to him, Israel, and their militia (Turkey), are awash in F-15's, F-16's, and the latest in offensive and defensive missile systems. Israel has a space program, ICBM's, nukes, and lots more.

Zakheim, who is a dual Israeli/American citizen and a Shul Rabbi, has stalked the halls of US government for 25 yrs. He has set defense policy which influenced Presidents Reagan, Clinton and Bush Sr. and Jr. This rabid Zionist was the controller of the Pentagon when an audit discovered over a trillion dollars was missing.

Most of Israel's armament was obtained thanks to him. Squads of US F-16 and F-15 were classified as military surplus and sold to Israel at a fraction of their value.

Zakheim is a rabid Zionist, who carries an Israel passport and is considered to be one of the top members of the secretive Illuminati . He predicts 9/11 and by sheer coincidence the Pentagon is hit by a remote controlled jet (Zakheim's ' SPC ' corporation is the premier company in the field).


During his tenure as controller at the Pentagon from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004, over one trillion dollars was unaccounted for.

Military information is jeopardized, military contractors billed the US for Israeli items, $50 million fighter jets are classified as surplus and the list goes on and on. As the scandal of the missing 3 trillion dollars surfaces the Rabbi quickly resigns.

Here's how it all came together:


Here's why:

On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attack would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good... ... .Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)"


On October 3, 2001, I.A.P. News reported that according to Israel Radio (in Hebrew) Kol Yisrael an acrimonious argument erupted during the Israeli cabinet weekly session last week between Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his foreign Minister Shimon Peres. Peres warned Sharon that refusing to heed incessant American requests for a cease-fire with the Palestinians would endanger Israeli interests and "turn the US against us. "Sharon reportedly yelled at Peres, saying "don't worry about American pressure, we the Jewish people control America."


USA, Whose Hostage?

By Ghali Hassan

05 April, 2005

As a result of the US invasion and occupation of Iraq, the living situation for the Iraqi people have deteriorated to a level far worse than at any time before the war. The fabric of Iraqi society have been shredded, and the war shattered all hope that Iraq would advance on paths to "freedom' and "democracy". Why, and who is the beneficiary of this act of aggression?

After the 9/11 attacks, the world expressed support and condolences for the US and the people of the US. The French daily Le Monde headline was; "We are all Americans now". On September 12, 2001, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: "It's very good," he said. "Well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy [for Israel]"[1]. The 9/11 attacks on the US proved to be the 'great joys' for Israel, the only country on the planet to express a kind of "Schadenfreude".

Accusations were levelled on all Muslims, particularly Arab Muslims, as if Ariel Sharon and his gang represent everything Jewish. Enemies of Muslims in the West and in the US are not difficult to come by. There are all sorts of Islamophobic psychopaths ready to unleash their fire on Muslims. Israelis and Israeli sympathisers, including the majority of US policy makers and US mainstream media, saw 9/11 as an "opportunity" to be used for unending war.

With the 9/11 attacks, the so-called 'neoconservatives', a euphemism for new breed of crypto-fascists, who were the architects of the US war on Iraq, saw their dream come true. The group forms a cult of pro-Israel "sympathisers"; including Paul Wolfowitz, deputy defence secretary, Douglas Feith undersecretary for policy, and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Dick Cheney, chief of staff and national security adviser. On the White House National Security Council staff, there were former Iran-contra figure Elliott Abrams and Robert Joseph were dealing with the Middle East and arms proliferation, respectively. Mr Wolfowitz in particular was described as 'over
the-top-crazy when it comes to Israel' and 'Israel-centric', cited by former CIA analysts, Kathleen and Bill Christison.

In their 1996 policy paper "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" presented to the then-Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser argued that Israel ('the Realm") had no choice go on the offensive attacks against Arab nations, including, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Iran. Iraq, the only serious challenge to Israel, have to be destroyed first in order to secure a stranglehold over Syria, which is depicted as the main danger to the Jewish state.

Rumsfeld's Defence Policy Board (DPB) was dominated by neocons, notably its former chairman, Richard Perle, former CIA chief James Woolsey, former
arms-control negotiator Kenneth Adelman and military historian Eliot Cohen. Immediately after the 9/11 attacks they pushed for war in the Middle East starting with the war Iraq.

Karen Kwiatkowski, a retired USAF Lt. Col., who was working at the Pentagon wrote; "What seemed out of place was the strong and open pro-Israel and anti-Arab orientation in an ostensibly apolitical policy-generation staff within the Pentagon". She adds, "By August [2002], I was morally and intellectually frustrated by my powerlessness against what increasingly appeared to be a philosophical hijacking of the Pentagon" [2]. The US powerhouse was taken hostages by a cult whose members proved to be less loyal to their own country than to a foreign power.

Patrick J. Buchanan, a conservative commentator and chairman of The American Cause, wrote; "On Sept. 20, forty neoconservatives sent an open letter of ultimatum to the White House instructing President Bush on how the war on terror must be conducted. To retain the signers' support, the president was told, he must target Hezbollah [the Lebanese Resistance movement] for destruction, retaliate against Syria and Iran if they refuse to sever ties to Hezbollah, and overthrow Saddam. Any failure to attack Iraq, the signers warned Bush, 'will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism'" [3]. We know now none of those had anything to do with 9/11.

Well connected to the centre of power and cleverly using the 'anti-Semitism' cliché to intimidate and bully any fair criticism of themselves or Israel, they had no problem to get their war on Iraq. The Pro-Israel cult in the Bush administration fabricated the first Iraq link to 9/11 in order to manipulate public opinion (American) and demonise not only the Iraqi people, but also the entire Arab nation. The second fabricated story fabricated by the cult was the story of Iraq's weapon of mass destruction (WMD).

Pretext after pretext have collapsed. Iraq was found to be a defenseless nation, and had no link to the 9/11 attacks or terrorism. Even George Bush admitted after the war that the link never existed. We know now that the WMD story was a lie. Paul Wolfowitz, the most warmonger of the Bush administration, told the July, 2003 issue of Vanity Fair magazine that he promoted the false pretext for "bureaucratic reason" and to create a "consensus" to go to war. In other words, the pretexts for the war were
concocted to make a case for an act of aggression. Mr. Wolfowitz new job is the "humanitarian" CEO of the World Bank, which required an "honest" and "decent" man.

Iraq had never pose a threat to the US. The nation was simply trying to survive 13-years genocidal sanctions. In the sunlight, the reasons for the war on Iraq become more obvious: (1) support for Israel's terror against the Palestinian people, (2) support for Israel's expansionism, and (3) enhance America's corporate interests and control over Middle East vital energy resources.

As a result of the war, the Iraq was destroyed as a state. Iraq's infrastructure and vital human services were destroyed and still in ruin. The Iraqi people are the most oppressed and most abused people on the planet today. Thousands of Iraqis have been imprisoned, abused and tortured by Occupation forces. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians have been killed and many more have been wounded.

A report in the credible British journal, The Lancet, on November 2004, shows that from March 2003 to October 2004, the US armed forces and its mercenaries have killed more than 100,000 Iraqi civilians; over half of them were women and children. The estimate is very conservative in that it excluded the high civilians death in Fallujah, and the complete destruction of a once vibrant city of 300,000 people. Other major Iraqi cities and towns are experiencing similar destruction and atrocities.

Israel appears to be the chief beneficiary of this war: Iraq was the only challenge to Israel's terror in the Middle East, and Iraq was a major supporter of the Palestinian right to self-determination and liberation from Israel's colonial Occupation. The Israeli Government used the war as a cover up for its increased crimes against the Palestinian people, and depicted any criticism of Israel's terror as "anti-Semitism". In the shadow of the Iraq war, Israel was able to build its Apartheid Wall, confiscate more Palestinian land and resources, and continues killing Palestinians with impunity never seen before. The war allows Israel to perfect its espionage networks in the US to spy on the US itself. In addition to massive military aid paid by US taxpayers to prop Israeli colonial army, Israel benefited from increase in its arms sale to the US war machine and to other places such as China. The Iraq war was a bonanza for the Sharon Government.

It should be noted that, for years, American taxpayer money has funded Palestine Occupation--the torture chambers, the military apparatus, the bulldozers used in house demolitions, the building of settlements and now the construction of the West Bank Apartheid Wall, declared illegal [4] by the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

In Iraq, Israeli Mossad agents were implicated in the assassination of thousands of Iraqi scientists and prominent Iraqi citizens and politicians to deprive Iraq from its human and knowledge resources. Iraqis rightly believe that Israeli agents involved in the destruction and looting of Iraq's cultural heritage. Israel was able to enlist the Kurds in North Iraq as its major allies for its espionage and interference in Iran affairs.

The cost to the US is that many US soldiers have been killed and many more have been wounded. The war is also contributing to the speedy decline of US power - bulging trade and budget deficits due to higher oil prices and rocketed war spending -, and US "moral prestige" in the world. The US has never been so isolated from the rest of the civilized world. Like Israel, the majority of the world public considers the US a "threat to world peace". The Iraqi people did not welcome the occupation of their land and have rejected the US forms of "freedom" and "democracy". An entire nation was taken hostage by an armed foreign power on behalf of other foreign power. Contrary to pro-Israel Zionists and anti-Arabs pundits' assumptions, the Iraqi people Resistance proved to be an effective force, and may have thwarted US military attacks against Syrian and Iran.

Undeterred by their failed strategy in Iraq and their deception of the American people, the pro-Israel cult in the Bush administration and their allies in the Israeli Government are pushing the US for more wars (against Syria and Iran) that are not in US interest. It is clear now that, 'what is good for Israel is [not] good for America' and Americans.

There is little doubt that the current US Government and its ideologues will continue to inflict harms not only on defenseless people outside the US, but also on the US and on the Americans people for the next few decades. The challenge is not whether the US will decline as an imperial power but whether the American people can prevent their country from becoming a permanent hostage of a foreign power and slow its decline.

Ghali Hassan lives in Perth, Western Australia

[1].  http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fiveisraelis.html
[2]. The American Conservative, Dec. 01 issue, 2003,
[3]. The American Conservative, March 24 issue, 2003
 http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/ipresscom/ipress2004/ipresscom2004-2_summary_m wp_20040709.htm.

Dumbing down goes further back to the billions of Rocefeller
like when he bought Encylopedia Britannica and took out extensive articles on the Inquisition,
and when his foundations pushed schools to teach Global Studies
not history....

just see how powerful this family has been in studies
The General Education Board started by John D. Rockefeller Sr. in 1902-- "In Raymond Fosdick's memorial history of the Board, he indicates that it was part of John D. Rockefeller Jr's effort toward "this goal of social control." [as cited in Research Manual: America 2000/Goals 2000, p. 54] The Rockefeller Foundation History also states: 1923...John D. Rockefeller, Jr., creates the International Education Board in 1923 with $20 million to promote education abroad, a parallel effort to the U.S. General Education Board."

The RF History also adds this important information about the activities of the Rockefellers: ."..The American Council of Learned Societies, which from the beginning derived most of its support from the General Education Board and then from RF, receives the first of many additional grants to support fellowships in humanistic studies....Beginning in 1933 and extending for more than 20 years, RF expends $1.5 million in identifying and assisting 300 scientists and scholars from Nazi Germany to settle in friendly locations; many relocate to U.S. universities. 1936...Raymond B. Fosdick becomes president of RF and serves until 1948...1948...Dr. Albert C. Kinsey, professor of zoology at Indiana University, publishes Sexual Behavior in the Human Male-popularly called the "Kinsey Report." Kinsey received his first RF support in 1946...1971...RF funds the Population Council's newly established International Committee for Contraceptive Research to develop and test new methods of fertility control....

In 1962 Edith Roosevelt, writing about the "Universal Theocratic State" stated, "Curriculum is being drafted to indoctrinate our children in what "John D. Rockefeller Jr. calls 'the church of all people.'...Plans are being made to set up regional World Universities whose objectives would include 'to instruct in all religious but will not make religion it's aim,' 'build a world outlook' and teach the physiological , psychological and spiritual aspect of sex.'...On July 31, 1962 Dwight D. Eisenhower endorsed setting up a World University to provide 'World Thinkers' to funnel into the United Nations....Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara is a sponsor of the Temple of Understanding, the $5,000,000 "Spiritual UN' for the six major faiths...UN official lecture at meetings of the Arcane School, the international 'group of New World Servers', who form 'Triangles' to work for UNESCO." These were established by occultist Alice Bailey's Lucis Trust, which was to be affiliated with the U.N. Meditation Room. [10]
In 1962 , Nelson wrote, "The Future of Federalism" which claims that current events demand a "new world order." He stated that there is: "A fever of nationalism...but the nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks...These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order...Sooner perhaps than we may realize...there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world."

Nelson developed the CIAA, which was his own version of the CIA, and which had intelligence oversight of the South American continent. He used what ever political and social networks that were available to achieve his goals, using the intelligence community to advantage. His lust for wealth propelled him to desire control over every aspect of the continent. He planned major highways spanning the Amazon jungle, building dams, lakes, ranches, incorporating drilling and mining and reaping what belonged to the Native population. With Nelson's endorsement, the governments of South America were manipulated and managed extensively by the CIA, to benefit not only Rockefeller, but the US desire for global wealth and control against "communism." [Thy Will Be Done] His ventures have impacted not only the native peoples but devastated the environment, which comes in sharp contrast to his brothers Laurence's and David's environmental ventures, which supposedly are to protect the environment.
Speaking at the Sept. 23, 1994 United Nations Ambassadors' dinner, David Rockefeller remarked,

"This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long." "We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." 38

911 The right major Crisis!

Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched



 link to www.madison.com
"The continuous consolidation of money and power into higher, tighter and righter hands."
--George H.W. Bush in 1992, answering a question of what Iran-Contra was all about

This has all been accomplished by powerful liars, who have grown richer and bolder with each successful deception. As George H. W. Bush mentioned in his famous unpublished quote to Sarah McLendon more than a decade ago: "[I]f the American people ever knew the whole story about Iran Contra, we Bushes would be chased down in the streets and lynched." [Editor's note: Excellent suggestion.]


Additional Titles


Forces at Work to Build a US Police State


China when HW Bush was quoted in Sarah McClendon's newsletter in June 1992:
"If the people were to ever find out what we have done, we would be chased down the streets and lynched."

Bush-Bones Doctrine: "Deny Everything" "There's three things to remember: claim everything, explain nothing, deny everything." - Senator Prescott Bush (Skull & Bones 1917) The Bush family patriarch made the above statement in a 1966 interview for Columbia University?s oral history project on the Eisenhower administration. Prescott Bush said that political dictum had been explained to him by Claire Boothe Luce, congresswoman, ambassador and wife of Time-Life media magnate Henry Luce (Skull & Bones 1920).

Date: Mon Sep 11, 1995 10:20 pm CST
From: John Q. Public
EMS: INTERNET / MCI ID: 376-5414
MBX:  capmicro@execpc.com

TO: * David Beiter / MCI ID: 635-1762
Subject: Sarah McClendon: Are Dems and GOP Using Drug Money?

The following appears in the 9/11 edition of the Washington
Weekly, and is posted here with permission:

White House Press Conference, September 7, 1995.

MS. MCCLENDON: Mike, I understand that Vice President Gore
has told President Clinton that he understands that the
government is letting sale from - profits from narcotics which
are coming in here be used, be laundered and be used to finance
both political parties. Mr. Clinton was apparently not aware of
this, but Mr. Bush apparently was. And Mr. Gore has insisted
that it be stopped. And Mr. Clinton, I understand, is now saying
that he will take some steps to stop this financing of political
parties, both political parties, by profits from drugs coming
into this country for sale which are ruining the country. Now, I
wonder when Mr. Clinton is going to start his movement on this
and what he's going to do.

MR. MCCURRY: I haven't heard any of that before. That
sounds like the plot for a very good novel. But I haven't heard

MS. MCCLENDON: Now, don't make fun of it, Mike, because it's
true. It's true.

MR. MCCURRY: I'm not making fun of it. If it's true -

MS. MCCLENDON: Just go and check it with the President.

MR. MCCURRY: All right. I'll go ask the President if he's
taken any steps on that and report back to you.

[We'll be waiting -Editor]

Copyright (c) 1995 The Washington Weekly ( http://www.federal.com)

Date: Tue Nov 28, 1995 2:35 pm CST
From: bigred
EMS: INTERNET / MCI ID: 376-5414
MBX:  bigred@duracef.shout.net

TO: * David Beiter / MCI ID: 635-1762
Subject: Interview With Sarah McClendon -- 08/30/95

Interview with Sarah McClendon, 08/30/95
First published in the October 1995 Conspiracy Nation Newsletter
Contact  bigred@shout.net for info about the CN Newsletter

I got your phone number from Sherman Skolnick, in Chicago.

Yes, he's a good friend of mine.

I don't always agree with him! [laughs]

Yeah. I know. Me too.

You wanted to ask me about somethin'.

Okay. My first question would be, there's a newsletter called
*Relevance* newsletter...

Yes. I'm familiar with it. They send it to me all the time, from
Michigan. I haven't had time to read it! [laughs]

Yeah. I kind of know what you mean. I get a lot of stuff from
readers that I don't have that much time to read everything

But they quote you as saying,

Sara McClendon told your editor in mid-May that there were 16
sealed indictments sitting in the Arkansas District Court,
three of which indict Hillary Rodham Clinton with bank fraud
to the tune of $47-60 million, obstruction of justice, and
possibly perjury.

I didn't give any amount. And I said one time.

I don't think I said three. I know I said two and possibly three,
at one time.

But they were planning to indict her on those things. But I
didn't give any amount of money, and...

You remember what date that was? (You don't, I guess.)

But anyway, I'll have to look it up.

People are always quoting me, and quoting me wrong! You know what
I mean?

Yeah. Yeah.

And I understand that she's *not* going to be indicted now. And
so that was what they were trying to do, and wanted to do. But I
think they've backed down from that.

Okay. This was in their [*Relevance*] June/July issue.

Okay. So you're sayin' that, "No. She has not been indicted."

I don't think she has. I don't think she will be. That's based
on, you know, my assumption, my analysis of the situation. And
there may be something different tomorrow!

Yeah. Okay, I've been hearin' this from a lot of sources. Sherman
Skolnick had said that she was indicted. Somebody that may be
known to you, Debra von Trapp, said that, yes, Hillary had been

Debra von Trapp doesn't know a goddamn thing about it.

Okay. So that would be another question.

Mr. Skolnick is assuming, he's assuming too much. He gets some
talk with some former CIA people, but he assumes a lot of things.

Okay. And goin' back to Debra von Trapp: I had interviewed her,
and she told me quite an amazing story -- okay? -- about...

About Japan.

Do you give any credibility to that?

No, I do not. But she has her own business connections with them.

She *does* know a man, she says, that she worked with on the
transition from [George] Bush to Clinton, who she says "bugged"
the White House machines. And she says that he told her that, "We
took down Foster." He worked at the time, supposedly, for the CIA
and the FBI.

Yeah! That would be Robert Goetzman. That she was sayin'...

That's right.

...that. Do you believe that story?

Yes, I do.

You believe that Goetzman was involved in that?!

Goetzman must have been. Because he told her, according to her,
that "We took care of Foster."

I know how to get in touch with Goetzman. But he was *furious*
when I found him. [laughs]

I could imagine that he would be.

He was *furious* when I found him.

But the White House said to me, "Are you sure he doesn't work on
any of *your* maintenance contracts? With your machines?"

And they said, "He will never work here. We can assure you that
he will not be working here." So by that tone of voice (that was
a man who manages the White House machines), I am quite sure that
he was watching to see, to check to see if they had been

And what about, Debra von Trapp also, besides the "bugging" of
the White House, she says, as far as the Oklahoma City bombing,
that there had been some complicated plot. Are you familiar with
what she had said about that?

Well she called me the night before the bombing to tell me that
something was going to happen. But about all that she did was,
she left a message on my answering service for me to call her.
And she didn't say when it was going to be (she didn't say
specifically). The next day, she told the Michigan Militia that
she had told me ahead of time where it was gonna be and all about
it! [laughs] But she did not! I did not know ahead of time it was
gonna be.

But are you familiar with what she's sayin', that this bombing in
Oklahoma City was in retaliation for a sarin gas attack in Tokyo
that had occurred a month previously?

In Japan?


Yes, I'm familiar with it.

Do you give credence to it?

No, I don't.

But, I mean, I do not, but I know that she had some business
dealings over there. And, you know, anything could be possible.

Personally, I don't think it's very plausible.

Clinton seems to be causing, or at least assisting, the self-
destruction of the Democratic Party...

No. He's not doing anything of the sort. He wouldn't do anything
like that. That's ridiculous. The Democratic Party has been goin'
downhill for the last two or three campaigns. And they're going
downhill because they don't have enough sense to have any
leadership! They don't *take* leadership! They don't *do*
anything! It's not Clinton's fault! Clinton is the only leader
they've got who's [unclear] for it. It's not Clinton's fault that
they're doin' this. It's their own fault. And the people inside
the Democratic Party who are left-wing liberals want Clinton out!
They want him out so bad they're probably going to get him out
and get him so embarrassed that he'll resign. And *that* faction
of the Democratic Party has been enlarged in the last week, week
or two, by more middle-of-the-road Democrats who want him out. At
the same time, normal people in the United States -- and there are
politicians in Washington, Democratic leaders in Washington and
I -- think the people around the country are very well-satisfied
with Mr. Clinton. And I believe Mr. Clinton can be re-elected.
And I think he *will*.

And the Democratic left-wingers who are trying to get him out of
office, I don't think they have anyplace to go! I don't know
what's to become of them. And I don't care.

Okay, that's interesting. Because my perception, my background is
I have always identified with the Democratic Party -- until

Well I've always been a Democrat, I'm still a Democrat. But at
the same time, I think the Democratic National Committee in
Washington has absolutely no leadership!

Well there's definitely a problem. Because I see a lot of the
politicians are jumping ship!

Well you know what I think is happening? I think that the same
pot of -- I can't prove this, but I know other people that agree
with me -- I think the same pot of money is behind campaigns for
both parties. They may be doing it in the name of other people,
but I think that the money is coming from narcotics being sold in
this country.

To me, that's a key part of the problem, is this *huge* trade in

It wouldn't be happening without government approval in some way.
It's gotta be government approval, somehow. And I think that
money is being used to finance both campaigns, and they just
decide which party will win against the other.

[George] Bush has been mostly the manipulator. Bush has been
manipulating the Clinton administration ever since they got in

Could you amplify on that a little bit?

Well Bush has been causing to happen, or pulling strings to
happen, tragic things to happen. But he... 30 percent of the
policy makers in the Justice Department are his people! He *owns*
Louis Freeh, the FBI man. And he owns... And Jesse Helms, the
other faction, the right-wing conservative Republicans who want
Clinton out, Jesse Helms owns Kenneth Starr.

Okay. And that's kind of my perception, too, is that... Say with
Mena, Arkansas, that whole thing...

That was completely Bush and the CIA, and completely... and not

And yet Clinton is somewhat involved, isn't he?

No. He's not "somewhat involved", not at all. And they're tryin'
to say so, and the people that are saying so have no more proof
than the man in the moon that he's taken any of that money that's
being laundered through there. That's utterly ridiculous.

The CIA and Bush are responsible for that. And Oliver North. And
Bush, and a former congressman from Arkansas, a Republican, set
up Mena as a base. Now Mena was only one of a *ring* of bases,
from Florida to Arizona, that Bush set up to take *out* arms and
to import narcotics, because of the Iran-Contra.

Yeah, I'm familiar with that.

And Mena is still going, and Mena is now being used, to a great
extent, to bring in money for laundering. And a lot of this money
comes from narcotics sales, either in this country or in the
islands or somewhere else.

Yeah, it keeps going back to the drug trade. I think that's the
*big* problem in this country.

And I think that some of the same people are deciding it, whether
Democrats or Republicans will get it this time.

But there's this person named Terry Reed -- okay? -- that, he
wrote a book called *Compromised*. Are you familiar with that
book at all?

I've heard of it. But I don't have it and I haven't read it.

He insists that Clinton was involved. In fact, he insists that
Clinton actually, that he was at a meeting where Clinton

Is this the meeting where Bush went too?


Where they were talkin' about the money?

I forget, exactly.

But Reed insists that... My perception is that, yes, Bush was the
major player here. But that Clinton...

Bush is the major player, by *all* means. And you know what they
did with him. A group of over one-thousand citizens petitioned
Clinton to find out what was goin' on at Mena because they felt
they had a right to know. And he agreed to use $25 thousand to
investigate it. Then he *didn't* spend that money because the CIA
came to him and told him, "Lay off. Don't do a thing to us. We
need this operation at Mena, Arkansas, for 'national security'."

Okay. So it's the CIA, really, that... Clinton, it happened to
occur in his state, and when he wanted to look at...

This was the CIA who did this, and they did it at Betsy Wright,
who was Clinton's chief-of-staff, who lived in Washington. She
was the person whom, everybody had to go through her to see
Clinton. And she's the one that said the CIA came to him and told
him to lay off.


In the July 31st, 1995 issue of *your* newsletter -- this got put
on the Internet, a portion of it, and I'm quotin' what was...

The July 31st newsletter?

Yeah. According to what I have, you write that "To study [Vince]
Foster's death is to learn federal secrets."

This seems to imply that Vince Foster's death is just the surface
of a much bigger and wider story.

I think it goes into four administrations.

So it goes back to Carter.

Carter didn't know too much about it. But Jackson Stephens owned
a system of communications called "Systematics". And it was taken
off of Inslaw. Inslaw, you know, had PROMIS pulled out of it and
sold by Ed Meese around the world. PROMIS is the system to keep
up with criminality. And Systematics is a system to keep up with
money transactions around the world. Jackson Stephens took the
Systematics system and gave it to Jimmy Carter, because he and
Jimmy had been friends at Annapolis, were roommates or somethin',
and they loved each other. And then Jimmy put it into the

And then Carter went out, and Bush came in. And Bush took the
Systematics and worked it over. And he, it had been in and out of
the National Security Agency. If you ask them about it, they say
they don't know what you're talkin' about.

Systematics has several branches, one of which was in Boston. And
Systematics was something that Hillary and Foster were assigned
by the Rose Law Firm to be the lawyers for Systematics. And they
came, several different times they were assigned to work on
Systematics. And when they came to the White House, Foster was
doing political work for Hillary and Clinton. But he also was
still working on this Systematics!

And that's what happened. And then I think that he [Foster] was
used as a messenger boy by Bush, on Systematics.

So the bigger story here is basically Inslaw: the theft of the
PROMIS software and the way that that was integrated into a lot
of the banking system.

Well, you see, PROMIS is one and Systematics is the other: both
came out of Inslaw. And they were both taken!

Now Hamilton, who owns Inslaw -- he brought Inslaw forward and
tried to sell it to the Justice Department; they beat him out of
it -- Hamilton says that a former employee of Systematics told
him that the Systematics plan came out of Inslaw.

Okay. And what about these recent allegations you may have heard
of, that Foster had $2.86 million in a Swiss bank account?

I know nothing about that. I know absolutely nothing about that,
and I doubt that the people that say that can prove it.

Are you familiar with Jim Norman's recent article? ["Fostergate"]

I certainly am. From the beginning I have talked to him and lived
with him, before he got fired and after he got fired [from
*Forbes* magazine]. And I don't believe that part of his story. I
don't believe that Foster was an agent for Israel. I don't
believe Foster was givin' away atomic secrets to Israel. And I
don't think that could possibly be. [CN -- McClendon subsequently
changed her mind. As reported on the Internet, 09/07/95, George
Putnam said as follows on his radio show: "I want to read
something here from Sarah McClendon. 'An Apology To James
Norman.' She says, 'I want to apologize to James Norman for
saying I did not think that he had correct sources. I said I did
not think his information was right. I was wrong. Norman was the
senior editor of *Forbes* magazine, fired for writing so much of
the truth.'"]

I think that stuff was put out by the CIA because they evidently
wanted to cover up something else.

All right. But would you say that the part of the story where,
towards the end, Norman is concerned about that other, say 200 or
so, high-level U.S. officials *also* had money in Swiss bank
accounts? Are you familiar with...

Well they could have. They could very easily have. But you know,
that could be any source in the world. That doesn't mean

Are you familiar with the story that there's some, so-called,
"Fifth Column" of computer hackers in the CIA that...

No, I don't know anything about that.

Okay. You mentioned how Norman got fired. And you, I think, are
experiencing some kind of heat because you've been looking into
Foster's death.

I was fired, too.

You got fired!?

I got fired from a new thing: AT&T Interchange Online. I got
fired after a few weeks of goin' to work for them.

And would you say that that's because you'd been lookin' into
Foster's death?

I think it was because of the story I wrote where I said, on July
the 14th, I wrote that I thought this investigation would go back
to George Bush and Caspar Weinberger.

That's kind of like, Sherman Skolnick has been tellin' me the
same thing: that the story that's out there, the "Fostergate"
story, is a watered-down story; that the *real* story is that it
goes back to Bush and Weinberger. For example, Weinberger...

I think it goes back three or four administrations.

Okay, but there's a bigger story...

I tell ya, it goes back, all the way back to 1980. I think that
Bush and Weinberger wanted Israel to get the atomic secrets so
that she could get the bomb ahead of others and she could hit
Russia for the United States. So she could protect herself from
her enemies.

And I think the reason that Bush wanted Israel to have this is
because he wanted to make it up to Israel for what she did for
him and Reagan in 1980 when the Israelis handled the weapons that
came from the United States, which Iran wanted. We were not
supposed to be dealing with Iran at all. And the weapons became
Bush and Reagan's private weapons to Iran. And they promised
these weapons to Iran and they came through Israel and were
*delivered* to Iran. And in return for that, Iran agreed to keep
the American hostages 71 more days so that they could be,
wouldn't get home in time to help Carter in his campaign for the

So you agree with the story of the "October Surprise": that there
was some kind of deal.

Oh definitely. There definitely was. And Bush has denied it all
along. And people have *seen* him in Paris at the time he claims
he wasn't there. They saw him there and they know he went to the
meeting. And I definitely think the agreement was made there.

Okay. As far as any "heat", you know that Jim Norman got fired
from *Forbes*. And then you also got fired.

You know who fired him, don't you?

Caspar Weinberger [publisher *emeritus* of *Forbes*].

That's right.

We've got to find out more about Caspar Weinberger. He's very
much involved in this. And *why*. And we've got to find out more
about it though.

We know that Bush ran Iran-Contra. We know that Weinberger was
very much involved in Iran-Contra, because he kept a diary.

What about Jonathan Pollard? Is Pollard just a bit player in all
this? Like, he took the fall for this?

Pollard is a very strange person. And I understand, I think it's
about September the 12th that there's a hearing for Pollard (I
think in Washington); a parole hearing. And Pollard's friends
think he's gonna be out of prison by November.

And Pollard was apparently just a fall guy, used... They say
that, all of a sudden, information about atomic energy started
comin' to his desk. Why'd he pass this on? Why'd he take the
fall? I don't know.

Caspar Weinberger was *terrible* in denouncing Pollard, and
sayin' that Pollard should get all kinds of punishment. And it
sounds rather funny to me.

But I think Pollard was just an agent of -- I don't know how you
would say it -- but he was apparently used as an agent, somehow,
in this business.

It's almost like they had to find *somebody* to be guilty for it.
And so they just took him to be the one as the scapegoat for all

That's apparently right.

I think we have yet to find out some cause to all this. We should
follow the Foster investigation so thoroughly that we finally get
back to Bush and Weinberger and find out what really happened!

For me, it's really frustrating that, it's *obvious* to me that
there's a lot of suspicious circumstances surrounding Foster's
death, and that it hasn't really been properly investigated.

That's right.

And if you dare... You know, for me, a somewhat lowly individual,
if I dare to state publicly that I'm not happy with the
investigation and I think there's something suspicious about
Foster's death, people automatically laugh at you, they say that
you're "crazy", you're "paranoid".

I know that. I know that. Some of those people are *encouraged*
to do that by the CIA or other people for disinformation. And the
disinformation is so prevalent that we can't get to the facts!
And they try to make fun of us for believing in conspiracies and
believing in pushing this. They try to make fun of me and
everything else.

And we just have to keep on doin' it.

You say, in your newsletter, that "I am one of the Washington
reporters -- four that I know of to date -- who have been fired
or threatened with firing, or worse, in the last few days for
writing about Foster."

You say, "firing, *or* *worse*." What's "or worse"? You mean an
IRS audit? How else are they going to try to go after you for
daring to look into Foster's death?

Well they've threatened, they've harassed, people who are against
'em, who are trying to get out the truth and who are trying to
expose the government. They harass them in many, many ways. They
harass them through their relatives, their friends. I know a
woman who's been harassed because she disclosed that a firm up in
Pittsburgh was sending tools to Iran. And she's been harassed for
*years*. And she had, the other day, had loads of diesel fuel oil
dumped in her yard.

Okay. But it seems like, that sometimes they can get pretty
rough. There's a lot of suspicious deaths, for example, connected
with the JFK assassination: there were a lot of witnesses that
suddenly had so-called "heart attacks".

Well I'm on the board of an organization called "Coalition for
Political Assassinations". And we are studying these... In fact,
we are having our second meeting in Washington this fall. And
it's a wonderful meeting. It brings together scientists and all
kinds of people who know what they're doing. And they write
papers about Jack Kennedy's death. And we don't speculate at all.

So, just for the record, you're not satisfied with the official
version that "Oswald was the lone assassin".

Of course not. That's absurd.

And I believe, like Fletcher Prouty says -- he's a colonel in the
Air Force who was a liaison, I think, between the Joint Chiefs of
Staff and the CIA when it was being formed. And he says that, he
thinks that the Kennedy murder was done by a cabal of people in
government, for two reasons: one, Kennedy had said he was going
to pull the troops home from Vietnam and stop the war; and two,
he said he was going to tear the CIA apart.

Again, in your July 31st, 1995 newsletter, you write "I think he"
(meaning Vince Foster) "was dispatched on numerous missions
overseas to take money of others to Swiss banks."

So in other words, in slang terms, Foster was what they call "a
bag man". Would you agree with that?

I don't know anything about the Swiss banks. But I think that
Foster was a tool and he was used. And Foster had found out some
very bad things that are goin' on in the government. He wanted to
tell Bill Clinton about them on Wednesday, and he was killed
Tuesday afternoon.

Yeah. That whole thing, to anybody that can think, that can look
at the facts of Foster's death...

And before they even investigated, routinely investigated his
death, they said it was a suicide.

Yeah. There's just so much. I mean, that somebody would shoot
themselves in the head, supposedly, and then lie down with their
arms at their sides! [laughs]


Are you familiar with this person (you may not be), his name is
Orlin Grabbe?

Yes, I'm familiar with his work. I know what he's doing. He's a
very talented, very well-educated, qualified person who's taught
at Wharton School of Finance. And he taught, he wrote a textbook
that's used around the world by bankers. And he is a very well-
qualified man. But he's retired. [CN -- Grabbe is not retired.]
He just suddenly got in the business of writing. And he's writing
all these exposes' for Internet every day, and everybody's
readin' them. And he doesn't... Some of it he knows, and some of
it he knows from experience, and some of it he's assuming.

But he's now been writing about the Mellon Bank. And the Mellon
Bank has undoubtedly been... Um, I don't want to stir up
trouble... There's a big story in Pittsburgh right now, a big
case in the... The Mellon family is the family that started Gulf
Oil, for friends. And all of a sudden the Gulf Oil people are
gone, and dead. And they found out that the trust fund that was
set up for them had gotten to be billions. And that Mellon Bank
has taken these trust funds and re-invested them. And now the
Mellon heirs, the Gulf Oil heirs, are in court in Pittsburgh this
week, tryin' to get their money back.

You're obviously more familiar with this, you're closer to what's
goin' on. I just basically know what I read on Internet. I'm not
that close to it.

Well I tell you what: I do not believe that any of 'em have the
right story about Foster and the Swiss banks, or Foster and
secrets to Israel. You stay away from those two things, I think
you'll be better off.

And Hillary is *not* a lesbian!

[laughs] Okay. That's good to know.

She's very brilliant. And he is an honest man, trying to make a
real change in government.

Goin' back to Orlin Grabbe: in one of his articles he proposes
that we have got what he calls a "triangular trade" that's
underlying recent events such as Whitewater, the death of Foster.
The "triangular trade" involves third-world raw materials such as
oil and coca (that's processed into cocaine) that are exchanged
for first-world armaments and technology, with various banks
handling the laundering of the money. Hence: the Third World, raw
materials; First World, armaments; and the banks would be the
third party, would be getting their share of the loot by
laundering the money.

That's right. The banks are doing it like mad. And if you want to
know what I really think... This is just my opinion, right now. I
can't prove it. I can't document it. But I think the narcotics
money is dominating the economies of the world. And it's being
laundered in the United States, largely. And in the islands. And
the narcotics money is being divided between both parties, and
that is financing the election. It's maybe done under a different
name, different people, but that's what finances the election for
presidency. And I think it's terrible!

It's a huge industry.

I think that both parties are gettin' their money for the
election from narcotics. And I think the government is letting
the narcotics come in here.

Are you familiar with a book called *Dope, Inc.* by Lyndon

I think I bought that book years ago. Lyndon LaRouche said, when
I bought it, he said I had contributed to his campaign. I know
about that book, yes.

But apparently you don't have a high opinion of Lyndon LaRouche.

I don't have a high opinion of Lyndon LaRouche. I know he's been
tortured and mistreated and all that stuff. It's certainly sad
that, to tell people his story. And I think he has some, may have
some information. But I have never understood his economics.

The main thing, his drug book, as I recall it, is the drug trade
was being financed and largely put over the world by England.
Wasn't that right?


I think we're pretty silly to sit here every day and not do more
investigation about the dope and the narcotics. It's a bigger
issue than a lot of the issues that we're playin' with.

Brian Redman
Conspiracy Nation


[The following interview with Lt. Commander Alexander Martin (retired) took
place on Tom Valentine's Radio Free America program on July 10, 1995.
Valentine's comments follow "Q" while Martin's follow "A".]

Q: Only 3 percent? That means 97 percent went somewhere else.

A: It went into people's pockets. General Secord certainly profited
handsomely. General John Singlaub and a host of others did likewise.
However, would it have been possible for these men to carry out such an
enormous conspiracy, to traffic in such enormous quantities of illegal
items, without the duplicity and complicity of the United States govern-

Q: I don't see how it would have been possible.

A: It would not have been possible, and it was not possible at the time to
do so. I think George Bush said it very well in an interview with Sarah
McClendon, the grand dame of the Washington press corps. When Bush consented
to an interview with Mrs. McClendon in June of 1992, he said on record, which
she printed in her newsletter that month, when she asked him about Iran-
contra and he said, (and I'm quoting from her newsletter): "If the people
were to ever find out what we have done, we would be chased down the streets
and lynched." This was a public comment by George Bush.

Q: George Bush actually admitted that?

A: He said it and it was printed in Mrs. McClendon's newsletter in June of

[ This URL:  http://www.pdxnorml.org/MCCLENDN ]

Still unsolved????
Sent to democrats, and Press anti Bush


 link to www.the7thfire.com

On October 3, 2001, an Egyptian-American scientist named Dr. Ayaad Assaad sat terrified in a vault-like interrogation room at an FBI office in Washington D.C. It was not yet known that a pair of letters containing deadly anthrax had been mailed to NBC Newsman Tom Brokaw and US Senator Tom Daschle. Five people would die as a result of the anthrax mailings which had been mailed from New Jersey. Billions of pieces of mail were delayed, costing the US Post Office to suffer huge losses.
The news media ran nothing but anthrax stories night and day. Politicians and commentators speculated that Osama Bin Laden or Saddam Hussein were behind the letters. Why was the FBI questioning Assaad?

Just before the anthrax murders were committed, someone had sent the FBI an anonymous letter accusing Dr. Assaad of being a bio-terrorist with a grudge against the United States. (1)The letter was sent on September 25th - before the first anthrax case was even diagnosed. The FBI agents soon were convinced that the anonymous letter was a hoax and a frame up attempt. Assaad was cleared of suspicion and released. Assaad later told The Hartford Courant of Connecticut:

'I was so angry when I read the letter, I broke out in tears. Whoever this person is knew in advance what was going to happen and created a suitable, well-fitted scapegoat for this action. You do not need to be a Nobel Laureate to put two and two together." (2) (emphasis added)

If we find out who would have wanted to frame Dr. Assaad in particular, and Arabs in general, we will likely find out who was behind the anthrax murders. That the wording of the anthrax letters was contrived in such a manner as to frame Arabs/Muslims is so self evident that even a mentally retarded child could see through it. Here is the wording of the Daschle letter:

"You cannot stop us. We have this anthrax. You die now. Are you afraid? Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great." (3). and the Brokaw letter:

"This is next. Take Penacilin now. Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great." (4)

Give me a break!!!!!!!!! Ask yourself. Who would want to frame Arabs? Who would want to link the interests of the US and the interests of Israel in the obvious way these ridiculous letters attempt to? Remember the Lavon Affair? Remember the USS Liberty? Remember the dancing Israelis? Remember Netanyahu saying 9-11 was good for US-Israeli relations?

A good place to start searching for the culprit is the US bio-weapons lab at Fort Detrick, MD. The Ames strain of anthrax has in fact been traced to Fort Detrick, where Assaad once worked until he was laid off in 1997. After he was let go from Fort Detrick, Assaad filed a federal discrimination suit based upon the brutal abuse and harassment that he had endured from some highly suspicious co-workers. In 1991, Assaad found an 8 page poem in his mailbox which became a courtroom exhibit. The poem had 235 lines, many of them lewd and sexually explicit, mocking Assaad. Along with the poem, the perpetrators left Assaad a rubber camel with a large penis attached to it. (5) This was an obvious attempt to mock Assaad's Arab ethnicity. Assaad said that when he brought the poem to the attention of his supervisor, Col. David Franz, Franz kicked him out of his office! (6) Now these weren't immature college kids doing this. This outrageous emotional abuse was carried out by highly trained scientists who obviously wanted to force Assaad out.

The scientist who was the ring-leader in these horrible attacks on Dr. Assaad was Dr. Lt. Col. Philip Zack. Philip Zack was to "voluntarily" leave Fort Detrick shortly after Assaad brought Zack's poem and camel to the attention of his supervisors. (7) Strike one on Dr. Zack!

In an unrelated matter, another Fort Detrick researcher, Dr. Mary Beth Downs told army investigators that on several occasions in January and February of 1992, she had come to work several times to discover that someone had been conducting anthrax research after hours. (8)

Who could that have been? Documents from that 1992 inquiry confirm that an unauthorized person was observed on a surveillance camera being let into the lab at 8:40 PM on January 23, 1992. Who was this unauthorized person caught sneaking into the bio-weapons lab, during the same time period that anthrax research was being done after hours? It turned out to be Lt. Col. Philip Zack! (9) The same Zack who was forced to resign a year earlier because of his horrible abuse of Dr. Assaad. Strike two on Dr. Zack!

Why would Dr. Zack and others have such an animosity towards Dr. Assaad? What would motivate him to help write a 235 line hate poem? What motive would he have to frame Arabs for the deadly anthrax murders? Well, some research into the name "Zack" reveals that it is a fairly common jewish surname, derived from the Old Testament "Zacharias". Dr. Zack is Jewish, and given his obvious, fanatical hatred of Arabs - we can safely deduce that he is a hard core Zionist. Strike three on Dr. Zack!

All of the above is public information. Assaad's 1990's legal proceedings, Dr. Down's testimony, the surveillance video of Zack sneaking into Fort Detrick one year after he had "resigned"- it's all there. The Hartford Courant exposed all of these facts (10) as did the Toronto Globe and Mail, (11) the Seattle Times, (12) and other publications. Just the facts contained in Hartford Courant story alone should be enough to at least indict Philip Zack. So why didn't we see Dr. Zack's face on our TV screens? Why hasn't Dr. Zack been given a lie detector test? What forces in the media and the government are protecting Zack from being exposed as the logical prime suspect?

The plot thickens (and sickens) even more. It is not my intent to smear, defame, or offend jewish people here. But to not mention the ethnicity of certain players in this fantastic drama would be like writing an expose on the Italian Mafia without mentioning that it's major players are Italians. Remember, some of the Zionistsf harshest critics are themselves jewish.

Dr. Assaad had been cleared and Dr. Zack was coming under a small amount of media and FBI suspicion. Enter, from stage left, one Barbara Rosenberg, a jewish environmentalist professor and political activist with no expertise in bio-warfare. (13) Rosenberg suddenly went public with the claim that she knew who the anthrax killer was. (14) She was supported in this effort by another Zionist New York Times journalist named Nicholas D. Kristof, who openly called for the arrest of the innocent American scientist named Dr. Stephen Hatfill. (15)

Quietly and behind the scenes, Rosenberg began directing investigators towards Dr. Hatfill (and therefore away from Dr. Zack). The Washington Post confirmed that it was Rosenberg who helped put authorities on the trail of the innocent Dr. Hatfill. (16)

The name of Hatfill trickled forth from the news media. In a matter of weeks, the trickle became a media flood. Dr. Hatfill became a household name. Hatfill called a news conference to protest his innocence. There was never even a shred of evidence against him and he even passed an FBI lie detector test. (17) But the Zionist controlled media lynch mob, led by the evil Rosenberg and the yellow journalist Kristoff, continued to pursue and harass Hatfill. Dr.Hatfill will never be imprisoned, but his life and career have been destroyed by these false allegations and the media hype. Lt. Col. Zack is off the hook.

What these mad Zionist scientists and their media brethren have done to Dr. Assaad and Dr. Hatfill is monstrous beyond belief. It is clear that these anthrax letters were first intended to be an anti-Arab frame up with Assaad meant to take the blame. When that didn't work, these fanatical Zionists (who always stick together like glue!) put the media and the FBI on poor Dr. Hatfill's back, and wrecked his career and reputation in the process. Why hasn't Dr. Zack been given an FBI lie detector test???? Ask FBI boss and ADL "partner" ; Robert Mueller!

THE ANTHRAX LETTERS: AN OBVIOUS ANTI-ARAB FRAME UP, it was only sent to Democrats and media enemies


1. The Hartford Courant. Turmoil in a Perilous Place. Angry Scientists Allege Racism at Bio-warfare Lab. By Lynee Tuohy & Jack Dolan. December 19, 2001. Google users enter: courant assaad zack anthrax

2. Ibid

3. FBI. www.fbi.gov Google users enter: anthrax letters

4. ibid

5. The Hartford Courant. Turmoil in a Perilous Place. Angry Scientists Allege Racism at Biowarfare Lab. By Lynee Tuohy & Jack Dolan. December 19, 2001. Google users enter: courant turmoil perilous place And also anthrax downs zack

6. ibid

7. ibid

8. Hartford Courant. Anthrax Missing from Army Lab. By Jack Dolan & Dave Altimari. January 20, 2001.Google users enter: courant anthrax missing army lab

9. ibid

10. See footnotes 165 and 166.

11. Globe and Mail. (Canada). On the Trail of an Anthrax Killer. By Paul Koring. March 6, 2001.Google users enter: globe mail trail anthrax killer

12. Seattle Times. Deadly specimens disappeared from Army research lab in '90s. Reprinted from Hartford Courant. January 21, 2002 Google users enter: seattle times anthrax zack

13. Insight Magazine. Media Manufacture Cloud of Suspicion Over Hatfill. August 14, 2002. By Nicholas Stix Google users enter kristof hatfilll

14. The Times of Trenton. Expert: Anthrax Suspect IDfd. By Joseph Dee. February 19, 2002. Google users enter: rosenberg hatfill

15. Insight Magazine. Media Manufacture Cloud of Suspicion Over Hatfill. August 14, 2002. By Nicholas Stix Google users enter kristof hatfilll

16. Washington Post. Ex Army Scientist Denies Role in Anthrax Attacks. August 2002. Google users enter: rosenberg hatfill

17. Washington Times. Scientist Says FBI asked About Setup. By Gus Taylor. August 3, 2001. Google users enter: hatfill fbi passed lie detector test

1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 I 13 I 14 I 15 I 16 I 17 I 18 I 19 I 20 I 21 I 22 I 23


Iran? 21.May.2006 07:58



AP Erases Video of Israeli
Soldier Shooting Palestinian Boy


THIS is how desperate the ZIONISTS are to bomb Iran for the benefit of Israel. They TOTALLY FABRICATED THIS OUTRAGEOUS STORY, and the retraction will not be noticed.


Canada's National Post retracts report that Iranian Jews will be forced to wear yellow patches By Yossi Melman

For a few hours on Friday, many around the world were ready to believe a report in the media that Iran had decided that Jews living there would be forced to wear a yellow strip of material on their clothing to denote their religion.

Leaders of international Jewish organizations were quick to respond, and likened the decision to the Nuremberg Laws of Nazi Germany.

The affair was sparked by a report Friday in Canada's National Post daily. According to the report, exiled Iranians had said that Jews in Iran (some 25,000 individuals) would be required to wear a yellow strip of material or yellow star on their clothing.

Members of other faiths, the report said, would also require color identification - red badges for Christians and blue strips of cloth for Zoroastrians.

As expected, the report was met with rage among human rights groups, and Jewish organizations in particular.

Canadian Jewish Congress chairman Bernie Farber saying he was "stunned" by the report on the Iranian law.

"We thought this had gone the way of the dodo bird, but clearly in Iran everything old and bad is new again," Farber said. "It's state-sponsored religious discrimination."

Rabbi Marvin Hier, the executive president of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, was also quick to respond, and called on the UN secretary general to exert pressure to get the law abolished.

Published: Saturday, May 20, 2006

Several experts are casting doubt on reports that Iran had passed a law requiring the country's Jews and other religious minorities to wear coloured badges identifying them as non-Muslims.

The Iranian embassy in Otttawa also denied the Iranian government had passed such a law.

A news story and column by Iranian-born analyst Amir Taheri in yesterday's National Post reported that the Iranian parliament had passed a sweeping new law this week outlining proper dress for Iran's majority Muslims, including an order for Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians to wear special strips of cloth.

According to the reports, Jews were to wear yellow cloth strips, called zonnar, while Christians were to wear red and Zoroastrians blue. The Simon Wiesenthal Center and Iranian expatriates living in Canada had confirmed the order had been passed, although it still had to be approved by Iran's "Supreme Guide" Ali Khamenehi before being put into effect.

Hormoz Ghahremani, a spokesman for the Iranian embassy in Ottawa, said in an e-mail to the Post yesterday, "We wish to categorically reject the news item.

"These kinds of slanderous accusations are part of a smear campaign against Iran by vested interests, which needs to be denounced at every step."

Sam Kermanian, of the U.S.-based Iranian-American Jewish Federation, said in an interview from Los Angeles that he had contacted members of the Jewish community in Iran -- including the lone Jewish member of the Iranian parliament.

They denied any such measure was in place.

 http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=5c7bf231-1026-4448 -a122-d8c046057913&k=39818

Karl Rove INVENTED the White House Iraq Group (WHIG) for one purpose. TOTAL MESSAGE CONTROL.

Rove knew that the truth was the enemy of their conspiracy to conquer the Middle East (the PNAC plan). His job, every single day, is to convince you, me and the rest of the world that you didn't just see and hear what you just saw and heard...or if you did, it doesn't mean what your logical mind is attempting to tell you - because "we're in a post-9/11 world now" and black is white.

Karl Rove is the single most destructive force in the US Government...the enabler of the entire evil scheme...THE ARCHITECT.

The scheme includes 9/11 as the essential pretext. "9/11" ... how clever, Karl! Only someone with American sensibilities would select the number we have all memorized to call in the event of life threatening emergency as the date for this evil, KARL ROVE.

The war plan to invade Iraq was written BEFORE 9/11. The Secret Energy Task Force meetings that Cheney had with Ken Lay and the other OIL HOGS during which they all decided how to divide up the oil fields of the Middle East...all of that was BEFORE 9/11.

Cheney outsourced the implementation of the FALSE FLAG OPERATION to Mossad...the FALSE FLAG experts. This explains why over 200 Mossad agents were operating in the United States prior to 9/11. This explains why five of them were arrested, having been observed filming the planes hitting the towers and their subsequent collapse - celebrating our worst nightmare.

The outing of Plame was designed to destroy the best WMD intelligence the US had at its disposal regarding Iraq. Plame knew for a FACT that Iraq had no WMD. It was HER JOB to know. Therefore Rove perceived Plame (the truth) as his WORST ENEMY, and conceived of a plan to silence her. Rove is the individual who insisted that Wilson be sent to Niger.

This was the only way to launch a smear program which appeared to be aimed at Wilson, but was intended solely to shut down the entire Brewster Jennings operation and bury their WMD evidence.

He invented WHIG. Every single one of these individuals is a co-conspirator in a concerted effort to defraud America into committing its troops and its treasure to invade a foreign country to the sole benefit of BIG OIL AND ISRAEL.

The pending invasion of Iran is the next phase of the very same conspiracy. Karen Kwiatkowski let us know that Larry Franklin had set up an IRAN desk in the midst of the Pentagon's IRAQ planners. Larry Franklin has pled guilty for passing Top Secret Iranian Intelligence to AIPAC (Israel). Israeli Generals were free to come and go from the Cheney/Rumsfeld Office Of Middle East Invasion whenever they pleased, without need to sign the guest register.


9/11 - Afghanistan - Iraq - Iran - Syria. READ THE PNAC. A "New Pearl Harbor" was a REQUIREMENT for its implementation. Rove is running the entire PsyOps Machine to enable it.



A line from Rebuilding America's Defenses famously refers to the possibility of a "catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor" (page 51). This quote appears in Chapter V, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", which discusses the perceived need for the Department of Defense to "move more aggressively to experiment with new technologies and operational concepts" (page 50). The full quote is as follows: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor."

Huf post story on Victimus of Asbestoes 21.Jul.2006 11:41


July 20, 2006  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/claim-vs-fact-white-hou_b_23802.html
The News
The Blog
Eat The Press
Contagious Festival
Contact Us
David Sirota

CLAIM vs. FACT: White House on 9/11 Illnesses (47 comments )
READ MORE: 9/11, 2006, George W. Bush
In writing my new book Hostile Takeover, I spent a lot of time researching the real-world effects of the industry-government revolving door that is spinning like a fan in Washington, D.C. And today's USA Today provides a great example of how that revolving door plays a role even in public health issues. The newspaper reports that "nearly five years after the 9/11 terrorist attack, thousands of workers who toiled at the World Trade Center site continue to experience health problems, according to doctors at Mount Sinai Center for Occupational & Environmental Medicine in New York." Sadly, our government has resorted to lying about the whole thing - and those lies were originally shaped by someone who went through the revolving door.

The lies are brazen:


"Concern over ongoing ailments plaguing World Trade Center workers is also leading to accusations that federal safety oversight at Ground Zero was lax -- a charge that federal officials vigorously deny. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials said in a statement issued to USA TODAY in May that they responded immediately as events unfolded, with the highest priority being to protect the environment and health of the people of New York." - USA Today, 6/25/06

"In the days after the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, White House officials persuaded the Environmental Protection Agency to minimize its assessment of the dangers posed by airborne dust and debris from the skyscrapers' collapse, according to an internal agency report. The White House Council on Environmental Quality 'convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones' from news releases, said the report by the EPA's inspector general office." - Los Angeles Times, 8/23/03
Who would doctor such critical information? A man named James Connaughton, who President Bush appointed to head the White House Council on Environmental Quality. Just before Connaughton was appointed to that critical position, the New York Daily News reports he "was an industry lawyer who represented major asbestos and toxic polluters."

Yes, you read that correctly - Bush appointed a shill for industrial polluters to head the White House office on environmental quality, who immediately used his power to doctor critical public health information about the effects of massive pollution immediately after 9/11. This is the revolving door at work - a culture of corruption that is now so pervasive it affects the most basic and critical information the government is supposed to provide in order to protect the public.

Comments for this post are now closed
Send to a friend
Print Post
Read all posts by David Sirota

Related News Stories
GOP Senator Accused Of Exploiting 9/11 In Campaign Ad...
Bush Admin. Will Now Give War Detainees Geneva Convention Rights...
Courts, Congress, Allies Telling White House To Rethink War On Terror...
Related Blog Posts
Bill Cusack: Spiritual Politics
Bob Burnett: Winning the War on Terror
Dave Johnson: The Swiftboaters Are Back in the Water
Comments ( Page 1 of 2 > » ):
And we're supposed to be suprised or shocked by this news? The EPA has never been used for the purpose it was designed for. The United States government did the same thing to soldiers after the first Gulf War in 1991. They denied the existence of Gulf War Syndrome even though thousands of soldiers who were perfectly fine before they went into the "war", but came back with unknown symptoms. What all Americans need to realize is that we're all expendable. Our deaths don't mean anything. Hell, if they did maybe the fact that over 2,500 have lost their lives fighting for a lie might mean something. America, wake up!! I'm expendable, our soldiers are expendable, the persons reading this post and comment are expendable.
By: luaxanaevila on June 26, 2006 at 11:33am
Flag: [abusive]

Hey David, don't forget the role that Christie Witless played here. Now she's a lobbyist for the chemical industry.
By: cynicalgirl on June 26, 2006 at 11:35am
Flag: [abusive]

Christie Todd Whitman, former EPA head, quit because she was hoodwinked and hamstrung by her superiors. When a lifelong Gooper-- of necessity accustomed and hardened to workaday prevarication and deceit-- reaches her limit, you KNOW it must be bad.
By: LittleBrother on June 26, 2006 at 11:43am
Flag: [abusive]

Fear is best cultivated upon a singular acute point(issue), the more fear is spread about the less effect a single focal of it has on people.
By: libertypirate on June 26, 2006 at 11:44am
Flag: [abusive]

"Heck of a job Connaughten!"
By: Shakyjake on June 26, 2006 at 11:49am
Flag: [abusive]

LittleBrother, Whitman has never admitted to that. She stands by what she did. As a matter of fact, she lost in court over a lawsuit that would hold her personally liable. If she could give a rat's a**, she wouldn't be a chemical lobbyist.
By: cynicalgirl on June 26, 2006 at 11:55am
Flag: [abusive]

maybe it's time for the government to start the day off with a fresh glass of orange juice... agent orange juice.

we all know how innocuous that stuff is.

yummy yummy, good for your tummy, says the industrialist/politician!
By: nomoreforme on June 26, 2006 at 12:03pm
Flag: [abusive]

I lived 5 blocks from Ground Zero and my apartment was trashed - filled with the toxic dust. I never stayed at that apartment longer than the time it took me to throw away everything soft - i.e. clothing, bedding, rugs, furniture - you name it, prior to moving further uptown. And yet, I suffered from respiratory illnesses, skin rashes, eye irritations, etc. I have recently been diagnosed with lymphoma, a blood cancer specifically related to exposure to Benzene, which was at some points in the early phases of recovery at Ground Zero thousands of times over the OSHA limit. The World Health Trade Registry is not only not monitoring our health, but it took them several weeks to answer me that they have no other information to give me regarding the incidence of sickness for anyone in the proximity of Ground Zero. Nice system we have here.
By: weezb on June 26, 2006 at 12:09pm
Flag: [abusive]

Is there more post coming here? Showing a newspaper quote as a fact to dispute a newspaper quote three years later and from a different newspaper isn't very convincing. It also falls pitifully short of proving your claim of lying.

I know I will be labeled a shill, a Bush apologist and worse but none of that changes the fact that you never prove your accusation. And please don't use the straw man of since the Bush administration lied before they obviously lied here.
By: lawdevil on June 26, 2006 at 12:17pm
Flag: [abusive]

Speaking of claim and fact, didn't you accuse Rove of being a criminal and say he would be frog-marched to jail over the Plame-outing?

Since Karl has now been exonerated, don't you owe him an apology?

No need to thank me. Just trying to keep this "fact" and "claim" stuff in perspective!
By: reallygone on June 26, 2006 at 12:35pm
Flag: [abusive]

it's hilarious that you quote the la times and put the word FACT in front of it, while omitting any information from the ACTUAL DOCUMENT cited in the la times piece...why do I suspect they did the same sleazy thing...?
By: neoconX on June 26, 2006 at 12:43pm
Flag: [abusive]

Easy folks...
Anyone following this story doesn't need to rehash the stats.

The governments version has been debunked... ask the firefighters and the cleanup crew.

It would be nice to have links to the info, but if you're standing outside and getting wet, you don't need a meteorologist to confirm it's raining.
By: altohone on June 26, 2006 at 01:36pm
Flag: [abusive]

I'm one of those affected by this colossal Lie, which was a crime of depraved indifference committed against every rescue worker, and resident of NYC.

I am a retired NYC police officer who has Pulmonary Fibrosis, which is incurable and a direct result of working on the pile at ground zero for a month.

About two months ago, a NYC EMT who had been begging the city of NY to test the clothing he wore at ground zero, blew the lid off of this lie. He had saved his uniform in a plastic bag in hopes of finding out what was in that grey dust that we all had all over us. With continued government obfuscation, and refusal to even answer his requests, he went and had the uniform tested in a private lab. What was found on it was not only shocking, it is PROOF of the lies spun on us by a web of criminals in the US government! 98,000 times the acceptable asbestos limit, barium, chromium, lead, mercury, and a cornucopia of other poisons were found on that clothing! Not only did the EPA say the air was "No more dangerous than 2nd hand smoke", but that we should continue working and going about our daily lives downtown. Indeed, WE EVEN ATE ON THAT PILE OF POISON, with men from the CDC walking around in their insignia vests and jackets!

If you'd like to hear more about me, or my story, please visit my MySpace page which is dedicated to 9/11 Truth awareness, especially for First responders that are currently sick and dying from this big lie, which is "9/11".  http://www.myspace.com/nypd219...

Craig 9/11
By: NYPD on June 26, 2006 at 01:37pm
Flag: [abusive]

The WTC towers were coated with asbestos. It was used to fireproof the steel beams. According to architects in NY at the time of constuction, there was over 500 tons of asbestos used during construction.
When the Trade Center buildings collapsed the asbestos was turned to dust, spreading throughout the city. When asbestos is inhaled into the lungs it will slowly scar the lungs creating scar tissue. Imagine a small needle in your lung and each time you breathe that tiny needle flips from one part of your lung to another. This microscopic needle will take 15-30 years to scar the lungs enough to severely inhibit your breathing. The people working at ground zero had the most exposure and are most likely to become sick, but the dust from the WTC was spread all over the city. It still sits on top of buildings and I can't imagine that it will ever be cleaned up. We won't know the full impact from the toxic dust that was at ground zero and spread throughout the city for years to come, but I can tell you this.
According to the EPA and Christie Whitman. The employees from WR Grace that worked around asbestos for 20 years had a 90% chance of contracting a disease (asbestosis, mesothelioma) that would kill them.
By: kingarthur on June 26, 2006 at 01:52pm
Flag: [abusive]

Here is a good video that goes into more detail on this...

Jenna Orkin of the WTC Env. Org.: air poisoning at ground zero (6:19 minutes)
Video here->  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KijgE_yoTck...

Jenna Orkin of the WTC Environmental Organization details how the Bush administration Environmental Protection Agency told the public that the air in Lower Manhattan after the attacks of 9/11 was safe to breathe even while knowing is was not. This raises the question: if the Bush administration was willing to sacrifice the health and the lives of United States citizens, what else would they be willing to do?
By: truth01 on June 26, 2006 at 02:01pm
Flag: [abusive]

Sirota is obviously a member of the reality based community, and his argument is based on 'truth' and 'facts.' It will be easily dismissed by Repuglycans, who recognize neither. Geez, you might as well rely on 'logic' or 'common sense.' These concepts are all foreign to the Right-wing point of view.
By: SadButTrue on June 26, 2006 at 02:07pm
Flag: [abusive]

How can quoting a newspaper serve as stating fact?
While I have little doubt that the EPA didn't and isn't doing the job that we citizens want, you're giving us no ammo here.
By: bigred on June 26, 2006 at 02:11pm
Flag: [abusive]

Do some research on "depleted uranium ammunition" - this is what made the Gulf War - Desert Storm soldiers sick. U.S. is denying. They are still using this ammunition in Iraq and elsewhere today, as are some of our allies I believe.
By: kathud54 on June 26, 2006 at 02:15pm
Flag: [abusive]

Thank you, TRUTH01. The video is truly shocking.
Some months ago, I was against impeachment, thinking "how much more damage can they do in the time they have left in office". Now, I can hardly wait for the day they're gone because more and more evidence comes out showing how they are ruining lives. Yes, they're ruining this country.
By: bigred on June 26, 2006 at 02:30pm
Flag: [abusive]

David Sirota: "Claim vs. fact: White House on 9/11 Illnesses"

Like father, like son.

As one of your first viewers has already written, look what happened to Gulf War veterans with that Gulf War Illness after the Persian Gulf War. The govt. was in denial a long time there on that illness, too. Believe it took awhile under Clinton to recognize it for what it was. That's on the net for anyone who wishes to look it up.
By: seriously on June 26, 2006 at 02:39pm
Flag: [abusive]

What confuses me about this story is why lie? Are we protecting the terrorists from insurance lawsuits? Is it just force of habit? Anybody have any ideas?
By: piker62 on June 26, 2006 at 02:43pm
Flag: [abusive]

For all the non-believers...

from  http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/02/health/main1276366.shtml...

The judge said Whitman knew that the collapse of the buildings released tons of hazardous materials into the air that would have endangered the public and yet she encouraged residents, workers and students to return to the area.

"By these actions, she increased, and may have in fact created, the danger to plaintiffs," she said.

Batts added: "Without doubt, if plaintiffs had not been told by the head of a federal agency entrusted with monitoring the environment that it was safe, plaintiffs would not have so readily returned to the area so soon after the attacks."
By: cynicalgirl on June 26, 2006 at 03:18pm
Flag: [abusive]

911 and the JACKALS

Quoting Iraq War Inc. cheerleader NY Times as a source is hardly a strong move.

That said, a 911 cover-up is not in question. Most Americans may not know exactly what happened September 11, 2001 - but there is clearly enough evidence on the table to make a case for a DC-MSM sponsored "911 Commission" as cover-up.

Once and for all:

911 cover-up is no "theory" nor is it speculation. It is state sponsored treachery and high corporate crime as a fact of life.

911 cover-up this deliberate and widespread has vast ramifications in criminal collusion of an entire DC-MSM complex. This cover-up goes directly to naked power-grabs and the loss of a democratic republic in America in favor of a fascist cartel state.

A de facto corporate puppet DC-MSM complex has used 911 cover-up as an Eveready lynchpin for cooked foreign and domestic policy in "war on terror" and Big Oil grabs across the globe. All paid for by Americans in blood money. And all for cozy corporate jackals to further line their pockets in the looting of a nation.


Sibel Edmonds website:

On the cartel system:

By: Hal on June 26, 2006 at 03:27pm
Flag: [abusive]

So what did you expect? Want more? Let 'em keep their majority and you'll get more of the same.
By: argy on June 26, 2006 at 03:27pm
Flag: [abusive]


It is not about being a non believer it is about supporting what you say. Mr. Sirota did not. You provided more support with one link then he did in his entire post.
By: lawdevil on June 26, 2006 at 03:30pm
Flag: [abusive]

Page 1 of 2 > »

Related News Stories
GOP Senator Accused Of Exploiting 9/11 In Campaign Ad...
Bush Admin. Will Now Give War Detainees Geneva Convention Rights...
Courts, Congress, Allies Telling White House To Rethink War On Terror...
Related Blog Posts
Bill Cusack: Spiritual Politics
Bob Burnett: Winning the War on Terror
Dave Johnson: The Swiftboaters Are Back in the Water
Comments ( « < Page 2 of 2):
There's only one way to ensure effective government - make it live under the conditions it administers.

If the EPA executives who controlled the purse strings were required to maintain offices adjacent to the WTC, living with no more protection than the workers and local residents, the right thing would have happened.
By: myxzptlk on June 26, 2006 at 03:40pm
Flag: [abusive]

Christ, this is overwhelming. And some people wonder why we are all on some form of legal or illegal drug to cope. I am convinced they are devilish little imps on a mission to destroy us all, because such a large group who don't give a flying fuck about the lives of people at the level these monsters operate just can't be human. I wonder if we put them all on an island, just what they'd do to each other.
Maybe we can borrow one of the planes they ship dead soldiers home in that we're not allowed to see, and rendition them all to Syria to not get tortured. I'll send in the first dollar to help pay for the trip.
By: IMD on June 26, 2006 at 04:11pm
Flag: [abusive]

I lived 5 blocks from Ground Zero and my apartment was trashed - filled with the toxic dust. I never stayed at that apartment longer than the time it took me to throw away everything soft - i.e. clothing, bedding, rugs, furniture - you name it, prior to moving further uptown. And yet, I suffered from respiratory illnesses, skin rashes, eye irritations, etc. I have recently been diagnosed with lymphoma, a blood cancer specifically related to exposure to Benzene, which was at some points in the early phases of recovery at Ground Zero thousands of times over the OSHA limit. The World Health Trade Registry is not only not monitoring our health, but it took them several weeks to answer me that they have no other information to give me regarding the incidence of sickness for anyone in the proximity of Ground Zero. Nice system we have here.
By: weezb on June 26, 2006 at 12:09pm

You are fine, you are completely healthy.
You are fine, you are completely healthy.
You are fine, you are completely healthy.

Any sickness you may have comes from your obvious liberal lifestyle, and love for the terrorists.

There...saved the trolls some time.

By: countrybeforeparty on June 26, 2006 at 04:15pm
Flag: [abusive]

The government wanted the rescue workers either dead or too ill to speak. They are the ones who saw the steel from the WTC packed up and sent off to China without even being examined first. They know first hand about the government's cover-up of what happened on 9/11.
By: Purym on June 26, 2006 at 04:22pm
Flag: [abusive]

I like that - "The Recovering Republican" - I just figured out what I am!
By: kathud54 on June 26, 2006 at 04:35pm
Flag: [abusive]

Piker62, you ask "why lie?" The report on the event by the EPA suggests that they wanted to get Wall Street open as soon as possible. Money trumps human life for the rechristocans.
By: itmaybetoolate on June 26, 2006 at 04:41pm
Flag: [abusive]

@Dan G

Pray tell me what is a "Liberal Lifestyle"?
By: NYPD on June 26, 2006 at 05:09pm
Flag: [abusive]

Does anyone else get the feeling that the X-Files may have been a documentary instead of a far-fetched fictional series?

Testing biological weapons (Gulf War, Anthrax mailings, white phosphorus in current Iraq war), vaccines (Pfizer), explosives (WTC, pentagon), inhalants (Ground Zero) and diseases (Bird Flu, SARS, AIDS) out on unsuspecting Americans, soldiers, African children, Firemen, Indonesians, etc? Then we have the intense surveillance of our every move by every department of the Federal government, under the guise of keeping us safe from the harms they themselves are perpetrating on us?

I'll admit to being a little bit of a conspiracy fan, but this starts to get kind of glaringly obvious for those of us who like our conspiracies unprovable and deeply disguised...
By: sheila on June 26, 2006 at 05:11pm
Flag: [abusive]

I was afraid of this.
I had friends who rushed to NYC to aid in the cleanup.
I didn't stop them (who would have?) but I feared the air would be polluted with carcenogenics along with death.

Free health care to all the responders!
It'll never happen...
By: Vaughn on June 26, 2006 at 06:08pm
Flag: [abusive]

This just in: neo-cons and their obtuse followers use police, firemen, and soldiers like disposable kleenex. In other breaking news, the republicans continue to expand their monopoly over every branch of government. Now to our poll of the night: who are you going to vote for on American Idol tonight?
By: InformedCitizen on June 26, 2006 at 07:16pm
Flag: [abusive]

If you had kept up with the news in real time, you would have all of the knowledge (fact is trumped by spin every day in Bush's America) necessary to support Sirota's claims and wouldn't be perched like a vulture on a limb looking for weakness in his argument.
Anyone with any clue about hazardous materials knew that the ground zero atmosphere was toxic and would be until the clean up was complete. In realtime, there were liberal blogs discussing it and some MSM reportage as well.
I remember shaking my head sadly as I watched so many first-responders working on the death-pile without proper respiratory equipment. That was a huge failure of leadership that should be included in Giuliani's, Whitman's and Bush's resume. Of course the NYFD and NYPD share the most responsibility for not protecting their own personnel but they were staggered by grief and the loss of their leadership (not an excuse, however).
The real question is why wasn't this a primary political discussion three years ago? The answer is that Bush administration fingers were crossed hoping that affected people wouldn't be showing up quite so soon. Check out Republican attempts to pre-emptively pull the rug out from under any asbestos settlements.
By: blaze on June 26, 2006 at 08:31pm
Flag: [abusive]

The Bush administration is either telling whopping big lies or they are just plain stupid. In either case, this administration is so inept they should all be brought to charges.

Quality of Air means Quality of Life:

By: guitarsandmore on June 26, 2006 at 08:34pm
Flag: [abusive]

For over twenty years, PVA has been successfully used all over the world as a safe replacement for asbestos. Eternit began shipping PVA fiber-reinforced roofing slates in volume beginning in 1983. This long experience in the field has provided excellent data on the longevity of PVA fibers and their suitability as an asbestos replacement.

PVA has got wide acceptance as a less hazardous and cheaper alternative to asbestos. A recently-commissioned report by the UK Health and Safety Executive concluded that PVA fibres will certainly pose a smaller risk than chrysotile as they are generally too large to be respirable and the parent material causes little or no tissue reaction. PVA fibres are being used to replace asbestos in Brazil.
By: Guitarsandmore on June 26, 2006 at 09:07pm
Flag: [abusive]

Asbestos Still Being Used in USA, Despite The Known Risks

By: Guitarsandmore on June 26, 2006 at 09:11pm
Flag: [abusive]

My only hope is that slime politicians like Giuliani and Bush who visited the site as quickly as possible after the controlled demolition of WTC1, 2, 7 for their photo op will have inhaled ample asbestos fibers and other carcinogens to suffer in some small way a slow painful death for the treasonous crimes that they committed: a karmic taste of their own medicine.
By: nuggets on June 26, 2006 at 10:11pm
Flag: [abusive]

Asbestos Still Being Used In USA, Despite The Known Risks

The February edition of CancerWire focuses on the continued presence of a carcinogen that will stun many Americans - asbestos the well known carcinogenic mineral is still being used in the U.S. and this deadly mineral can be found in over 30 million homes and schools. These revelations and others were provided during a recent interview with Linda Reinstein of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO).

Asbestos Diseases are Incurable

When her husband Alan was diagnosed with a deadly cancer (mesothelioma) which is caused by asbestos, Linda Reinstein decided to take a stand. She turned her anger into action and co-founded the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO). Today, ADAO is an international organization that has representatives throughout the world and offers support, resources and education for a growing community of patients and caregivers.

Ms. Reinstein wants more Americans to know about asbestos so they can protect themselves and avoid being diagnosed with an incurable disease like her husband. "Asbestos can cause or contribute to cancers such as mesothelioma, lung, larynx, esophageal, and stomach cancer and many non-malignant diseases such as asbestosis and chronic pulmonary respiratory disease. Ten thousand lives are lost in the U.S. every year to all asbestos-related disease. Each case is incurable and often deadly and every case could have been prevented because the dangers of this mineral were known in the early 1900's," Ms. Reinstein explained. This enormous death toll may actually be under-reported because asbestos diseases are usually hard to diagnose. Many victims will die of cardiac failure or pneumonia and are never diagnosed with an asbestos related disease.

No Asbestos Ban?

In 1989, the EPA announced an asbestos ban and phase out. But in 1990, the ban was overturned by a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. "So we don't have an actual ban on asbestos, but instead a regulation to reduce exposure," said Reinstein. "Asbestos is allowed in certain concentrations. For example, under OSHA, an employee cannot be exposed to more than 0.1 asbestos fibers per cubic centimeter of air for an average eight hour work day. But, this gets confusing because how does a consumer know if a given product fits within those guidelines?" According to Reinstein these regulations may not even matter because the EPA has repeatedly stated that there is no safe level of asbestos exposure.

In addition to having asbestos present in new products and materials, an estimated 30 million homes, schools and offices are already contaminated with the mineral. So construction, repair, or demolition in older structures can lead to exposure as we saw on 9/11 with the World Trade Center. "One life lost to an asbestos related disease is tragic; hundreds of thousands of lives lost is unconscionable. While we can't reclaim the lives of our loved ones, we can make the world a better place for those who come after us." Reinstein concluded.

The entire interview will soon be available at  http://www.cancermonthly.com...
By: guitarsandmore on June 26, 2006 at 10:49pm
Flag: [abusive]

An excellent analysis of the "Trade Center Air" by academics who specialize in such activities:

By: LeftCoast on June 26, 2006 at 10:52pm
Flag: [abusive]

For the professional firefighters and emergency responders not to use appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) they would have had to been assured that that equipment was not necessary. These are men and women well versed in toxic environments. One look at the immediate post-attack environment would've had everyone of them going for a respirator.
My understanding is that the initial EPA reports were on the mark. Whitman gave up what integrity she had by having all reports cleared (read revamped) by the WH.
I agree that "just" newspaper articles may lack power, take a look at the 147 page report put out by the Sierra Club "Pollution and Deception at Ground Zero".
While the Sierra Club is not neutral, this report appears to be well documented and supported by..., gasp, science.
This action by Whitman and the WH, putting emergency and rescue personnel as well as the nearby public, at risk just so their rich cronies can continue to play the stock market, cost the EPA any respect and trust of the working people of this country. No longer can any working person take anything the EPA says about a work environment as truth. The OSHA General Duty Clause puts Whitman and the WH responsible for the illnesses and deaths of any and all those afflicted as a result of these misleading reports.
By: NWGuy on June 27, 2006 at 12:31am
Flag: [abusive]

David, That's nothing! Although it seems obvious now that asbestos and other particulates not good for the lungs must have been in all of that building material dust at the Twin Towers, the BIG lie is in what Cheney and Halliburton got away with about asbestos.

At the time of 9/11, Halliburton stock was as low as $6 a share, down steadily the past few years because of the threat of a lawsuit about asbestos deaths in Montana. Today, Halliburton stock is up to about $80 per share. The only reason that Halliburton shares came back from bankruptcy was because of preferential treatment by the prosecutors at the EPA, which eventually dismissed the asbestos case (I wonder why? This was post 9/11)
By: HJohnson on June 27, 2006 at 05:04am
Flag: [abusive]

Another try to get this link posted. Good information from experts who studied in depth the air quality at the WTC after 9/11:

By: LeftCoast on June 27, 2006 at 09:36am
Flag: [abusive]

Piker62, you ask "why lie?" The report on the event by the EPA suggests that they wanted to get Wall Street open as soon as possible. Money trumps human life for the rechristocans.
By: itmaybetoolate on June 26, 2006 at 04:41pm

Uh......Wall Street was "open" less than a week later, and operated from remote facilities. It can and will do so if a similar event ever occurs. There was no need to rush back to the physical building to commense stock trading.
By: laughingalltheway on June 27, 2006 at 09:56am
Flag: [abusive]

I've been saying all this stuff since right after that farking massacre. And now I could be dying from it. Wonderful.
Check out  http://www.myspace.com/helpgeorgetabb...

I hate this crap.

By: GeorgeTabb on June 27, 2006 at 06:01pm
Flag: [abusive]