portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting global

9.11 investigation | government

Bush's Real Goal - Dissolve America Into NAU, the (Nazi) North American Union Fourth Reich

What they are using in North America regarding fake 9-11 "justifications": "President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy....North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following [since Bush and Fox decided upon it together, in person, in 2005], calls for...only border...around the North American Union -- not between any...countries....Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes,"....Why doesn't President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws....The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue,....[and a continental NATO military is occupying the whole North American continent with the next state terror strike they orchestrate and allow to happen. Impeach Bush!]
Ein Volk, Ein Reich, .... Fourth time's a charm?
Ein Volk, Ein Reich, .... Fourth time's a charm?
Bush's Real Goal - Dissolve America Into The NAU
North American Union To Replace USA?
By Jerome R. Corsi
HumanEventsOnline.com
5-19-2006


President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA to include Canada, setting the stage for North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries.

Or, as the CFR report stated:

"The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments' physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America."

Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

Why doesn't President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?

Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project.

 http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=14965


Title: CFR Plan to Eliminate US-Mex.-Canada Borders, to sync w/post 9-11 NORTHCOM/NATO occupation
Author: repost
Date: 2004.11.17 09:48
Description: There has been a great deal of very aristocratic, corporate, and military integrating going on internationally post 9-11 to destroy all democratic feedback against their transnational corporate regime in three major states of North America: US, Canada, and Mexico. See all three links for the continuities. I would have chosen this to go under "forest defense" and "energy & nuclear" categories as well, so read for that. COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: "A tri-national task force, chaired by former Liberal Party deputy prime minister John Manley, with the full backing of all three [unrepresentative state corporatist] governments, is plotting the roadmap for this new, bolder alliance meant to compete with the European Union. [so they say...there is always someone else to blame for their desire to removing any local democratic feedback to the corporate elites...] William Weld, former governor of Massachusetts and Pedro Aspe, former Mexican finance minister, join Manley on the panel that reports directly to the Council on Foreign Relations." "The "NAFTA-plus" plan has also been referred to as "deep integration." Skeptics see it as a plan to eliminate national sovereignty and erode the American concept of representative government accountable to the people under the framework of the Constitution. Discussions so far indicate that Canada, under the new agreement, would immediately sign on to the U.S. strategic missile defense initiative. Canada would also make its vast lumber resources available to the U.S. [degradative corporations] and Mexican markets and provide more open access [and destruction of environmental laws regarding] to the northern neighbor's oil, natural gas and hydro-electric power resources. KISSINGER APPEARS HERE: "Other members of the task force include: Canadian Finance Minister Michael Wilson and Nelson Cunningham of Henry Kissinger's consulting firm, Kissinger McLarty Associates."

...

Title: FEMA's NAFTA-wide police state: & Bush/Cheney connections in its railcar contracts & lines
Author: the truth will not be televised, so learn to read
Date: 2004.10.18 11:05
Description: IN SHORT: Bush and Cheney have been shown to have ties to KCS, Union Pacific, Trinity Rail Car, The Chamberlain Group, and The Greenbrier Companies, after only a small amount of internet research. Imagine what you could learn if you followed up on this. ***I did not begin looking for a Bush/Cheney connection when I began researching this article, but I sadly ended up there.***  http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/300277.shtml

...

In the next 'US terror strike', whatever it is, means US, Canada, and Mexico have already been unified militarily under NORTHCOM's international military jurisdiction, and not US military jurisdiction. NORTHCOM internationalism was already "tested out" and activated, strangely, in the DC "sniper" events. Adds a whole different layer to those events in my mind.

Second, NORTHCOM sources most of its staff directly from NATO.

Therefore, NORTHCOM is effectively NATO personnel under a different name--over US, Canada, and Mexico. So, who's now in charge of NORTHCOM/NATO in the North American continent? Why, the very same commander, Eberhart, who was in charge of 9-11 NORAD standdown events and who was ostensibly in charge of NORAD's war games that let the terror strike of 9-11-01 occur... Eberhart was "promoted" to NORTHCOM in 2003, after doing such a fine job in the standdown of September 11, 2001 where thousands of US (and many other countries' citizens died.

Read these and the attached articles...

 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/11/303653.shtml

An old theory, but still a good one 21.May.2006 09:54

Guy Onda

The Council on Foreign Relations was founded in the tradition of the Atlantic Union, which was basically a swanky think tank for 19th Century industrialists and elected officials in the USA. It advocated a global role for the US, based on our traditional ties to Britain and Europe, plus the possibility for trade. The Atlantic Union played a major role of political influence in getting the US into WWI. The CFR followed around the time of WWII and also advocated expansion of federal government and subordination of states' rights to take advantage of America's new super power status. Unlike the Atlantic Union, however, the CFR sought the establishment of world government. To the critics, both the Atlantic Union and CFR seemed to be interested in a British-American partnership in global empire. Through its august membership which would be extended far and wide to just about any PhD, political leader, military officer, or significantly rich person, the CFR profoundly influenced foreign and domestic policy in the United States after WWII. Much of our current public education system was shaped by the CFR in the late 1940s and 1950s.

The term "New World Order" and the concept of "world government" have been common themes in opinion pieces from CFR members. Ostensibly, world government is needed for the good of mankind, as well as of America, they argued. Nuclear war needed to be avoided through international cooperation. Democracy needed to be spread. Coordinated policies were necessary to prevent over population. This was the public and broader internal mission of the CFR. However, the CFR also came under scrutiny by the press and political leaders of both parties, who felt that the CFR had become too powerful as a tool of America's super rich and was undermining democracy. Such controversy persisted and pressure on the CFR mounted until the early 1980s. Ronald Reagan himself was a vocal critic of the CFR all the way up to his surprise pick of George Bush as running mate, a man some biographers say he personally disdained. Other powerful critics of the CFR, like Congressmen McDonald and Heinz, would begin to die under what some consider suspicious circumstances. For the last twenty years, mainstream attention to the CFR, either through the press or government inquiry, has practically vanished. Likewise, the super rich and powerful men behind the CFR, like David Rockefeller today, who were once constant personalities in journalist's editorials, are virtually unknown to the American public.


In Senate testimony in 1950, James Paul Warburg, of the power banking family contentiously stated: "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." Rockefeller, who founded the more secretive and power Trilateral Commission within the CFR, would state in an address to his constituency in 1991, "The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries." Like Churchill once said (paraphrasing), "The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter." Such is the group hubris that develops within organizations like the Atlantic Union, the CFR, the Federalist Society, etc.

For the interested reader, the term New World Order and the concept of global government date back about 300 years and can be traced to more nefarious origins.

it will never work 23.May.2006 16:21

forest dweller

This Wasicu plan will go over like a lead tepee.....will never work.

are there grassroot movements to stop this in the kansas-mo area 22.Jun.2006 09:38

anonymous

how do we stop all this, are there groups out there to join? where do we write besides our senate and reps?