portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary united states

economic justice | legacies

The Universe is a Communist Plot

With whom should good, God-fearing Americans take up their protests??
Ever since the Big Bang, Someone out there has been up to no good! The entire universe is now an endless succession of FREE LUNCHES that must have American Conservatives seeing RED!!! No wonder they're working overtime to rectify the situation. I think this says it all:
One way to look at it is this: On the one hand, society compells us to participate in its institutions in certain ways before we've even had a chance to have any say in the matter. Some might think this is unfair. But on the other hand, society also provides us with basic needs without which our very existence would be unimaginable in the first place -- and that also happens before we've ever had a chance to have any say in the matter. That's just the way life is, and it could hardly be any other.

Just think about the vast social inheritance that all of us enjoy automatically. There is the physical built environment: libraries, schools, etc; there is the cultural patrimony: art, music, science, technical knowledge, even language itself; and then there is the ecological patrimony: air, water, forests, etc. We enjoy and depend on all these things from birth without ever being consulted, and without having to open our checkbooks as soon as we exit the birth canal. In fact, we never had to do anything at all or store up any "merit" in advance of entering this world, in order to earn the right to enjoy them.

(from the article about the Basic Income Guarantee (BIG): http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/04/337624.shtml)

You conservative heros are "red" 14.Apr.2006 12:14

The Only Sane Man?

"Always there has been some terrible evil at home or some monstrous foreign power that was going to gobble us up if we did not blindly rally behind it." "I am concerned for the security of our great Nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within."--Douglas MacArthur

Why did Eisenhower and Churchill stop short of Berlin and give Stalin so much at Yalta? Two great conservatives of the old guard, George S Patton and James Forrestal tried to go public about what they considered a dangerous association with Communist Russia. They died before they could.

"From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire."--Winston Churchill, stated to the London Press, in l922.

Why, despite a raging war in Vietnam and cold war with the USSR did the Nixon Administration (of which Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, etc., were a part) sign a "Presidential Determination" in 1972 that lifted bans on trade of 400 different commodities to the Soviet Union and allow the Export-Import Bank (a government secured global trade bank) to finance trade with the USSR, extending our Communist enemies $1.5 billion of credit? That was one Hell of a FREE LUNCH, wasn't it? And your God-fearing Republican heros gave it away to a country that was supplying North Vietnam with weapons to kill Americans.

Why did stallwart conservative, Prescott Bush, lend money to Thyssen Steel to support the build-up of the national socialism in Nazi Germany when he was president of Union Bank in the 1930s?

"Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."--Herman Goering

"What luck for the rulers that men do not think!"--Adolf Hitler

NE1, you are a fascist's dream. You think you are God-fearing and conservative, yet your party leaders have lured you into betraying your country and your faith. What are they doing to rectify the situation of political and sociological discourse in this article? Nothing, I assure you, except to make sure that you continue react with conditioned responses to certain words like "liberal," and "peace," so that you defend not the Constitution of the US, but the tyrants who are out to destroy it?

 link to www.geocities.com

We don't have social inheritance (yet) 14.Apr.2006 16:33

Marik marik@aracnet.com

I cannot agree with you completely. WHether or not you can enjoy the social inheritance of society is wholly based on your class, even from birth. Sure, if your born to a couple of white parents in the U.S. who enjoy a minutia of privilege (say beacuse they are small business owners or some such) then yes, you too can enjoy all the 'freedom' and 'quality of life' U.S. imperialism has to offer. However, for the rest of us (who are the majority here) there is no such social privilege or inheritance for us.

Your education, for example, is certainly not guaranteed. How many schools did PPS just close, 6 or 8? Might I add that PPS (portland public schools) is the urban school system; that is to say it is comprised of more black and latino students then white and is thusly (thank you institutional racism..is that part of social inheritance too? Oh wait, that's Imperialism!) much poorer. These students, who already face the shitty end of the stick, are having their inheritance of education taken from them. Then there is the overwhelming price of college tuiton these days (which is continually on the up and up). Some of us can can just ask daddy to pay for it, but by and large, a lot of us don't have this option; usually it is face an incredibly large (and growing) debt for the rest of our lives.

When you are born into this capitalist system, you have only what your family as individuals can provide for you. That is not social inheritance. You have no choice (unless you are born into the privileged class) but to rent your surplus creating labor to the highest bidder (or in some cases, the only bidder!). The 'land' that you grow up in (or maybe apartments) is not a product of social inheritance, but a product of the back breaking work your parents did prior to your arrival.

We should be able to freely enjoy the fruits of society and nature, because as you say, without society (and nature) they wouldn't exist. Since we are active participants in society and without us, that fruit wouldn't exist (except in nature of course), we are entitled to it. However, in todays modern Imperialist society, the fruits of society are pretty much wholly owned and guaranteed by and for the ruling class (even the fruit that occurs in nature!); taht is to say those fruits of society are kept for individuals who have ownership over the production of those fruits...the ruling class. So if we really want to create social inheritance, and freely enjoy those fruits of society that we all labor for, we must first rid the world of that ruling class by abolishing private ownership of the means of production.


i don't get it 14.Apr.2006 22:32

ne1

Uy veh..

How does someone come away from a reading of this opinion with the idea that it is some sort of airy Pollyannish apology for the status quo?

My point was not that we live in a perfect world of "no inequality." My point was that no one really believes we can or should apply the ideology of the marketplace consistently to the whole universe. I should have thought it would have been obvious, given the resort to the device of conjuring up the absurd image of a fetus emerging from the womb, checkbook in hand.

checkbook? 15.Apr.2006 06:50

karl roenfanz ( rosey ) k_rosey48@hotmail.com

what rights do we have? vote? wheres the paper print-out of how i voted to check and drop in the recount box? free speach zones? the whole country used to be one. the right to keep and bear arms to protect my other rights? well this law, or so many yards from a school or church. we now have three classes of citizens, the corporations and politicians, the middle income, the poor and veterans.

pretty f'n depressing 15.Apr.2006 10:32

ne1

Jeezus. Get me out of this mad house!

Three comments, and not one of them with the slightest comprehension of anything written above?? Is that really possible???

Ok, I will now explain in excruciating detail the words above for those who suffer from a devastating deficit in basic reading comprehension skills:

The image of a fetus emerging from the womb with a checkbook in hand is used to evoke the absurdity of the notion that the universe as a whole might operate on "free market" lines. That the universe as a whole is NOT a "free market" is an intuitively obvious truth to everyone, yet needless to say this truth gets clouded over by extremist rightwing propaganda in our society in this country, the United States of America, in particular. Got it?

The title "The Universe is a Communist Plot," also alludes to the same theme. It is meant to be ironic, humorous, sardonic, sarcastic, etc, etc, etc. It lampoons the tendency of the US ultraright (i.e., the entire formal US political class at the present moment, and those who embrace its ideology) to label anything that doesn't conform precisely to their absurd ideological fantasies as being "Communist" (or more often "Socialist").

Thus, if the universe as a whole self-evidently is not a "free market," then, following this ridiculous namecalling tendency on the part of the American rightwing, one might say jestingly that the "Universe is a Communist Plot."

If you have read this far and understood what I have just written, then you will begin to understand that I do not actually think that "the universe is a Communist plot." Nor have I written anything here either favorably or unfavorably as to the advisability of attempting to carry out any such "plot." Nor (for those of you who think favorably of [Cc]ommunism (the small or big "C" or whatever other varieties)) do I think that the universe is inherently fair. Thus, I am not "praising the universe" on account of its being "a Communist plot." Nor do I necessarily seriously think there are any "world Communist plots" afoot now, nor do I necessarily think there ever have been such things, which have always been phantasms fermenting in the feverish imaginations of (mostly) cornfed American biblebelters.

Got it???

Follow the link, which clearly indicates that this entire quote is embedded in a context to which the link refers, and you may also come to understand that this quote is but part of a larger argument advocating the sensibility of a Basic Income Guarantee (BIG).

Now that I've mentioned BIG again here, PLEASE, those of you who were not capable of arriving on your own at even the most basic understanding of the relatively simple and not particularly profound humor and irony of the initial blockquote above, do not presume to now critique here the advisability or inadvisability of BIG.

Instead, first read the ENTIRE discussion found at the link provided. Then do some google research. (Then, maybe take a self-guided course in reading comprehension. Mortimer Adler's book "How to Read a Book" would be great for starters. Actually, come to think of it, take the self-guided reading comprehension course FIRST, before reading any further here at all.)

Otherwise, you will only succeed in further embarrassing yourselves -- and me.

Thank you!