portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary global

education | youth

A Warning to French Students who protested the CPE

..and to students in high schools who walked out of class for immigration reform protests. Be warned: what happened in the 1970s could happen to you ten years from now.
Shortly after the successful protests of the 1960s, reactionary legislators in both Federal and state governments wrote into the law of the land several provisions denying student financial aid and research grants to anyone who had ever participated in a protest march.

This is not a joke. I personally saw the Federal Grant paperwork that young PhDs were required to sign testifying to their never having participated in a protest before they could even be considered for the grant money. So, if your photo has been published showing you in a protest, or you were cited for truancy, be aware that in a few years you could be denied educational benefits and work positions solely on the basis of your having exercised your right to free speech.

The vindictive and hateful nature of the rich, facist, fundamentalist, and white men in present positions of power is not to be underestimated. You might be aware that even now they are working to find ways to punish you by writing and enacting laws that bind you ever tighter to their service. They will not rest from the labor of trying to make you their slaves.

You may also find that people who were with you in the struggle at the time undergo conversion experiences and become as reactionary as they once were radicalized. Your best defenses against this pincer movement of mind control maniacs are: affinity groups/family support, competence in multiple skill sets, and calm, meditative focus in daily life (such as the Buddhist concept of 'right action').

However, it would not hurt to have universities and grand ecoles and high schools make a pre-emptive strike by declaring that no such limits can be imposed on academic freedoms; that research done on university property and by faculty members will not be constrained in any way by either government or commercial attempts to suppress or punish dissent. Churches, if they are worth their salt, can also denounce this sort of jealous malice from the wealthy old being directed towards the working class young.

Just thought you ought to know how long these people hold grudges for the loss of their illusions of being in control.
Uh, you're a little CONFUSED. FRANCE != US 14.Apr.2006 01:23

me

France IS DEFINITELY NOT the US. Even if some French elites wish it were -- and are working overtime to try and convert it into its likeness. But from the looks of it, the prospects for their success aren't too good. The French people ain't buying it.

Here's a good piece illuminating the differences:
 http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1112-29.htm

One of the big problems with Americans (whatever their political tendencies might otherwise be) is their myopic insularity and provincialism vis-a-vis the rest of the world. It's a big, big country, and despite the presence of immigrants from all over, most Americans have never been outside of it, nor have they a clue about the differences between their own and other societies. This retardation (naturally) stunts the growth and possibilities of alternative political perspectives here, too.

This problem is much less pronounced in Europe -- where most people can (and do on occasion) go fifty to a hundred miles in any direction and find themselves in a whole different country, with different languages, political traditions, etc.

The sacrifice can be beyond financial aid... 14.Apr.2006 09:22

Pravda or Consequences

We know that activists have died for purpose.

GW is too quick to draw a line in the sand and I think it is because he doesn't understand the impacts he creates. So maybe GW's refusal to budge is aikido in action.

Here's why. It's GW's war he and he and his crew are committed to it. Their success depends on America's focus on terrorism. "You're either with us or against us."

If you support our troops, you have to support GW. This is where the fun comes in.

Repubs need to cut their losses if Iraq becomes Viet Nam. What if Iran really doesn't have the bomb but rather a facility for power generation (with all its evil) and couldn't build one without a lot of internal and external conditions? Remember Iraq? Can you trust a guy that has fucked every national policy we've had? Pre-emptive is not democracy and we see where we (exercising our first amendment rights to challenge policy) held the high ground. And if pre-emptive was not "constitutionally suspect" where was the pre-emptive strike (of relief) for Katrina. Yes, these events will cost money and in some one's perspective it would have weakened the Republic, but that is the price you pay for a stronger Democracy. Can't have it both ways.

The tragedy I see is that the Demos don't seem to be more strongly advocating the reasons why resources are better spent on education, housing, and health care rather than warfare. That makes me think that the Demos are more in favor of a Republic than a Democracy. Participatory rather than compulsory government should be the focus.

With low ratings for GW, this is rare opportunity indeed.

words 15.Apr.2006 21:54

Edward

I am interested how some of this paperwork you saw was worded (re: demo participation).