portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts global

alternative media | media criticism

Actor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story

Here's the link to the article below:
 link to www.prisonplanet.com
Alex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | March 20 2006

Actor Charlie Sheen has joined a growing army of other highly credible public figures in questioning the official story of 9/11 and calling for a new independent investigation of the attack and the circumstances surrounding it.

Over the past two years, scores of highly regarded individuals have gone public to express their serious doubts about 9/11. These include former presidential advisor and CIA analyst Ray McGovern, the father of Reaganomics and former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury Paul Craig Roberts, BYU physics Professor Steven Jones, former German defense minister Andreas von Buelow, former MI5 officer David Shayler, former Blair cabinet member Michael Meacher, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds and many more.

Speaking to The Alex Jones Show on the GCN Radio Network, the star of current hit comedy show Two and a Half Men and dozens of movies including Platoon and Young Guns, Sheen elaborated on why he had problems believing the government's version of events.

Sheen agreed that the biggest conspiracy theory was put out by the government itself and prefaced his argument by quoting Theodore Roosevelt in stating, "That we are to stand by the President right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."

"We're not the conspiracy theorists on this particular issue," said Sheen.

"It seems to me like 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75% of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions."

Sheen described the climate of acceptance for serious discussion about 9/11 as being far more fertile than it was a couple of years ago.

"It feels like from the people I talk to in and around my circles, it seems like the worm is turning."



Suspicious collapse of buildings

Sheen described his immediate skepticism regarding the official reason for the collapse of the twin towers and building 7 on the day of 9/11.

"I was up early and we were gonna do a pre-shoot on Spin City, the show I used to do, I was watching the news and the north tower was burning. I saw the south tower hit live, that famous wide shot where it disappears behind the building and then we see the tremendous fireball."

"There was a feeling, it just didn't look any commercial jetliner I've flown on any time in my life and then when the buildings came down later on that day I said to my brother 'call me insane, but did it sorta look like those buildings came down in a controlled demolition'?"

Sheen said that most people's gut instinct, that the buildings had been deliberately imploded, was washed away by the incessant flood of the official version of events from day one.

Sheen questioned the plausibility of a fireballs traveling 1100 feet down an elevator shaft and causing damage to the lobbies of the towers as seen in video footage, especially when contrasted with eyewitness accounts of bombs and explosions in the basement levels of the buildings.

Regarding building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, Sheen highlighted the use of the term "pull," a demolition industry term for pulling the outer walls of the building towards the center in an implosion, as was used by Larry Silverstein in a September 2002 PBS documentary when he said that the decision to "pull" building 7 was made before its collapse. This technique ensures the building collapses in its own footprint and can clearly be seen during the collapse of building 7 with the classic 'crimp' being visible.



The highly suspicious collapse of building 7 and the twin towers has previously been put under the spotlight by physics Professor Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan of Underwriters Laboratories, the company that certified the steel components used in the construction of the World Trade Center towers.

"The term 'pull' is as common to the demolition world as 'action and 'cut' are to the movie world," said Sheen.

Sheen referenced firefighters in the buildings who were eyewitnesses to demolition style implosions and bombs.

"This is not you or I watching the videos and speculating on what we saw, these are gentlemen inside the buildings at the very point of collapse."

"If there's a problem with building 7 then there's a problem with the whole thing," said Sheen.

Bush's behavior on 9/11

Sheen then questioned President Bush's actions on 9/11 and his location at the Booker Elementary School in Florida. Once Andy Card had whispered to Bush that America was under attack why didn't the secret service immediately whisk Bush away to a secret location?

By remaining at a location where it was publicly known the President would be before 9/11, he was not only putting his own life in danger, but the lives of hundreds of schoolchildren. That is unless the government knew for sure what the targets were beforehand and that President Bush wasn't one of them.

"It seems to me that upon the revelation of that news that the secret service would grab the President as if he was on fire and remove him from that room," said Sheen.



The question of how Bush saw the first plane hit the north tower, when no live footage of that incident was carried, an assertion that Bush repeated twice, was also put under the spotlight.

"I guess one of the perks of being President is that you get access to TV channels that don't exist in the known universe," said Sheen.

"It might lead you to believe that he'd seen similar images in some type of rehearsal as it were, I don't know."

The Pentagon incident

Sheen outlined his disbelief that the official story of what happened at the Pentagon matched the physical evidence.

"Show us this incredible maneuvering, just show it to us. Just show us how this particular plane pulled off these maneuvers. 270 degree turn at 500 miles and hour descending 7,000 feet in two and a half minutes, skimming across treetops the last 500 meters."

We have not been able to confirm that a large commercial airliner hit the Pentagon because the government has seized and refused to release any footage that would show the impact.

"I understand in the interest of national security that maybe not release the Pentagon cameras but what about the Sheraton, what about the gas station, what about the Department of Transportation freeway cam? What about all these shots that had this thing perfectly documented? Instead they put out five frames that they claim not to have authorized, it's really suspicious," said Sheen.



Sheen also questioned how the plane basically disappeared into the Pentagon with next to no wreckage and no indication of what happened to the wing sections.

Concerning how the Bush administration had finalized Afghanistan war plans two days before 9/11 with the massing of 44,000 US troops and 18,000 British troops in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, and in addition the call for "some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor," as outlined in the PNAC documents, Sheen stated, "you don't really put those strategies together overnight do you for a major invasion? Those are really well calculated and really well planned."

"Coincidence? We think not," said Sheen and he called the PNAC quotes "emblematic of the arrogance of this administration."

A real investigation

Sheen joined others in calling for a revised and truly independent investigation of 9/11.

Sheen said that "September 11 wasn't the Zapruder film, it was the Zapruder film festival," and that the inquiry had to be, "headed, if this is possible, by some neutral investigative committee. What if we used retired political foreign nationals? What if we used experts that don't have any ties whatsoever to this administration?"

"It is up to us to reveal the truth. It is up to us because we owe it to the families, we owe it to the victims. We owe it to everybody's life who was drastically altered, horrifically that day and forever. We owe it to them to uncover what happened."

Charlie Sheen joins the rest of his great family and notably his father Martin Sheen, who has lambasted for opposing the Iraq war before it had begun yet has now been proven right in triplicate, in using his prominent public platform to stand for truth and justice and we applaud and salute his brave efforts, remembering Mark Twain's quote.

"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."

------------------------------------

Please feel free to contact us about this story at  mediaonly@infowars.com

Listen to the entire Charlie Sheen interview right now for free by clicking here.

------------------------------------
what next? 21.Mar.2006 19:08

raT

for years now we've waited for some major celebrity to add his voice to the 911 truth chorus. First it was going to be Ed Asner, then he punked out. So did front-runners Oliver Stone and Sean Penn. Nicky Cage and Spike Lee got on the pussycat bus too. So who comes out of the woodwork? Hollywood bratpack bad-boy Sheen. The NAVY SEAL himself, of all people. Well, good for him, I say. We need all the mainstream help we can get. Let's get his Dad on the platform too. Hell, let's start a Hollywood 911 Truth Committee. Why not? Al Franken sure isn't any help. (att: rad talk show hosts-stay off Air America-they'll just castrate you). Go Charlie, go! When's the movie start filming? I hear David Griffin can write a good screenplay.

Correction 21.Mar.2006 21:27

5atori

Ed Asner did not "punk out" he made his pro-truth position clear.
He just isn't really famous enough to get big coverage.

Go Charlie! Good luck breaking the news blackout.

Write him a letter 21.Mar.2006 22:12

just a person out there

Charlie Sheen has balls to put his professional credibility on the line and take a stand on this. I think we should write him so he knows real people out there support his stand. The world listens to these hollywood celebrity types, so if any of them are willing to speak up on these issues we should support them! If he sees the public generally supports him for taking this stand, then maybe other famous celebrity types will also speak up on this. When I googled for him I noticed he has a bunch of celebrity ex-wives/girlfriends and his father is also a celebrity. If more speak up then the celebrity-worshiping mass media cannot squash it anymore.

I'll save you the simple Google search and post them here:

Charlie Sheen, Box 710, 15030 Ventura Blvd, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Charlie Sheen, c/o ICM, 8942 Wilshire Blvd, Beverly Hills, CA 90211

"The world listens to these hollywood celebrity types" 21.Mar.2006 23:25

Burro

Yes, write Charlie and thank him. Hopefully, more celebrities will start speaking up on this.

Meanwhile, we, the non-celebrity types, can speak up on this too. I suggest that we send emails or faxes to our congressional reps. Hopefully, people like Earl Blumenauer and Peter DeFazio will respond.

I'm re-sending the following email to my rep. with an additional request for some kind of response:

Dear Congresswoman Hooley,
December 14, 2005

I am seeing more and more stories of late that dispute the findings of the official investigation into the events of September 11, 2001. Some folks are being caught up into various theories ranging from missing airplanes to military drones and missiles, to other more bizarre "facts". My concern is based solely upon the strange collapses of the three WTC buildings - especially Building 7, which was not hit by an airplane.

My feelings are that any thinking, rational person - after viewing the facts - would demand a further investigation as to why Building 7 collapsed. There are still too many unanswered questions to the events surrounding 9-11. Again, my focus is on the mysterious collapse of WTC Building 7.

Would you be so kind as to provide me with your thoughts on this very important matter? After looking at a summation of the facts (provided below), would you agree that a further investigation is needed?

Thanks for your time.

Sincerely,
Name, Address, & Phone Number


References:

Dr. David Ray Griffin
 link to www.globalresearch.ca

Professor Steven E. Jones
 http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

[As of March 21, 2006, I have not received a response from Congresswoman Darlene Hooley, although her office has sent (1) a questionnaire about my needs and desires, and (2) info about Medicare and the prescription drug program].

this thing called Air America 23.Mar.2006 11:24

TruthOutNow

As far as Air America is concerned, Ganeanne Garofalo is awesome. She speaks whatever is on her mind. My only issue with her is that she doesn't really focus enough on the most poignant topics, not that she does it intentionally (Sam Seder is anything but radical...I don't know why she chose him as her co-host, so he's not a great influence for radical change). We need to contact Ganeanne and thank her for mentioning 9/11 truth every so often, and encourage her to be even more emboldened to keep on keepin' on. Randi Rhodes is a great person to have on our side, only she doesn't touch on many radical issues at all. Lately though, I think it's starting to change. I see her as a potential comrade in the 9/11 truth movement. Mike Malloy is another.
Al Franken, on the other hand, is a waste, and isn't worth the air time he is given. Nothing of value or substance ever gets discussed on his show. Far as radical progressives are concerned, he might as well join the corporate media choir because he's not much different in terms of his gatekeeping techniques.

BOYCOTT Al Franken and PROMOTE Ganeanne Garofalo, Randi Rhodes, and Mike Malloy.

Air America & Charlie Sheen / 911 28.Mar.2006 14:44

Protean bf@proteanmedia.com

Has anyone heard "any" of the talkshow hosts on Air America report on Charlie Sheen going public on the 911 cover-up? I don't expect anything from Amy Goodman of Democracy Now--but Mike Malloy or possible Thom Hartman might have the courage to bring this up--does anyone know if they have?

I have been hopeful about Air America, but to me this is the litmus test for them. Will they pass the test?

With Sheen and several other big celebrities adding their names to the list of those questioning the 911 "official" story --we may have a shot here. This is the time for Air America to really stand up and use it's weight--will they?