portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting united states

9.11 investigation


I read that Scholars for 911 truth are meeting today in Virginia, and subject is SCHOLARS AFFIRM CHENEY COMPLICITY IN 9/11. "The experts base their conclusion on testimony presented to the 9/11 Commission by U.S. Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta on May 23, 2003, which was omitted from its final report, and on related events at the Pentagon.
Members of the society will present their findings during a press conference to be held at 1 PM on Tuesday at the United States Courthouse in Alexandria, VA, the location of a trial to determine whether Moussaoui, who is called "the 20th hijacker", should serve a life term or receive the death sentence.

"Mineta's testimony is devastating," observed James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., McKnight Professor at the University of Minnesota. Fetzer is the founder and co-chair of the scholars' society, which recently joined with Judicial Watch in calling for release of documents, films and videos, and physical evidence withheld from the public by the administration. "It pulls the plug on the Commission's contention there was no advance warning that the Pentagon was going to be hit."

According to Secretary Mineta's testimony, which is in the public domain, when he (Mineta) arrived at an underground bunker at the White House (known as the Presidential Emergency Operations Center), the Vice President was in charge. "During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon", he stated, "there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, 'The plane is 50 miles out.' 'The plane is 30 miles out.'

"And when it got down to, 'The plane is 10 miles out,'" Mineta continued, "the young man also said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders still stand?' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, 'Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'" One way to construe these remarks could be that the orders were to shoot down the plane.

The scholars suggest that that is an implausible interpretation. The Pentagon, they observe, may be the most heavily defended building in the world. If the orders had been to "shoot it down," then no doubt it would have been shot down. Moreover, there would have been no apparent reason for the young man to have expressed concern over whether or not "the orders still stand." Shooting it down, under the circumstances, would have been the thing to do.

"The only reasonable interpretation of the orders," Fetzer observed, "is that the incoming aircraft should not be shot down, which would have been an obvious source of anxiety for an aide. Since it contradicts the official story about the Pentagon," he added, "it had to be suppressed and was not even included in The 9/11 Commission Report." And other scholars, including Professor David Ray Griffin of Claremont Graduate University, have drawn the same conclusion.

Philip J. Berg, Esq., Former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania and a past candidate for Governor, Lt. Governor, and U.S. Senate from Pennsylvania, who is a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, added, "Those who made it happen were obviously in the position to know that it was going to happen and therefore could have sounded a warning alarm. The case against Cheney is more powerful than the case against Moussaoui. No one is more culpable than the perpetrators. If Moussaoui deserves the death penalty, what does our Vice President deserve?"
See Scholars for 911 Truth at

This web article might be of help.

No censure: Impeach!

911 was an inside Job by Dick Cheney and PNAC

Also of note is the persecution of people Critical of Cheney, and Bush, under the Patriot act, Arctic Beacon reported this :

Journalists To Be Jailed For Speaking Out Against "Little Hitler Bush;" Slats Grobnik Gets National Security Letter, Too!
Doug Thompson reported how he was sent a letter by the FBI to turn over records about his popular Capitol Hill Blue web site. Thompson's response was short and to the point, as Slats Grobnik from Chicago says his deer rifle is locked and loaded if they come after him.
9 Mar 2006
Just how widespread, and uncontrolled, this latest government assault has become hit close to home last week when one of the FBI's National Security Letters arrived at the company that hosts the servers for this web site, Capitol Hill Blue.

Remember Capital Hill Blue reported the story that Secret Service Agents said Cheney was drunk when he hit his companion. They've also written critical info on Bush. IF THIS IS NOT POLITICAL PERSECUTION WHAT IS?

Other jouirnalists critical of these men, Wayne Madsen  http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/ , Sherman Skolnick, Larouche, have all expressed their concerns over pending investigations of themselves.

Also see Greg's article  http://www.arcticbeacon.com/13-Mar-2006.html
Strange Illuminati Numbers: Former FBI Agent Jailed For 33-99 years For Uncovering White House Connection To Illegal Drug Trafficking. Family Says Orders Must Have Come Down From "Daddy" Bush Himself To Have Agent Framed
Richard Taus wanted to go public in the 1980's about illegal government sponsored drug trafficking he documented while serving as an FBI agent. Refusing to backdown to inside pressure, it led to trumped up charges of child abuse he claims are "totally false," leading to a long prison term.

I do believe once J.F. Kennedy was assassinated, the powers that had done this, (Senior Bush among others, CIA,  http://jfkmurdersolved.com/buy2.htm click on Posada installed his friends on the very right wing to continue the oil and drugs business,
Cheney, and Rumsfeld. They were behind the illegal financing of CIA illegal activities, within and without the government through the years.

They effectively pulled off a coup de etat, by passing Congressional scrutiny, installing the military industrial fascist government they have today. Allied with the globalist elite they are destroying America and the Constitution.

Thank you for all you are doing to expose this corruption.

also ar

Bush Harbors Terrorists
by Plunger


Is The Sunday Herald a reputable paper?

What are we to make of this?

Sunday Herald - 02 November 2003

Five Israelis were seen filming as jet liners ploughed into the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001 ...

Were they part of a massive spy ring which shadowed the 9/11 hijackers and knew that al-Qaeda planned a devastating terrorist attack on the USA?

Neil Mackay investigates...

THERE was ruin and terror in Manhattan, but, over the Hudson River in New Jersey, a handful of men were dancing. As the World Trade Centre burned and crumpled, the five men celebrated and filmed the worst atrocity ever committed on American soil as it played out before their eyes.

Who do you think they were? Palestinians? Saudis? Iraqis, even? Al-Qaeda, surely? Wrong on all counts. They were Israelis - and at least two of them were Israeli intelligence agents, working for Mossad, the equivalent of MI6 or the CIA.

Their discovery and arrest that morning is a matter of indisputable fact.

It has always been a long-accepted agreement among allies - such as Britain and America or America and Israel - that neither country will jail a "friendly spy" nor shame the allied country for espionage. Chip Berlet, a senior analyst at Boston's Political Research Associates and an expert in intelligence, says: "It's a backdoor agreement between allies that says that if one of your spies gets caught and didn't do too much harm, he goes home. It goes on all the time. The official reason is always visa violation."

What we are left with, then, is fact sullied by innuendo. Certainly, it seems, Israel was spying within the borders of the United States and it is equally certain that the targets were Islamic extremists probably linked to September 11. But did Israel know in advance that the Twin Towers would be hit and the world plunged into a war without end; a war which would give Israel the power to strike its enemies almost without limit? That's a conspiracy theory too far, perhaps. But the unpleasant feeling that, in this age of spin and secrets, we do not know the full and unadulterated truth won't go away. Maybe we can guess, but it's for the history books to discover and decide.
PNAC is about Zionists.

The "New Peral Harbor" was their creation...the "pretext"














The PNAC plan, which is in the process of being implemented to the letter, called for a "New Pearl Harbor" as the essential trigger for its implementation.

The Signatories to the PNAC plan include most of those who worked within the power positions to direct the activities surrounding 9/11 and the lead up to the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq.

GW's youngest brother, Marvin Bush, was the director of a casualty insurance company with coverage of the World Trade Center. That the coverage was stopped sometime before 9-11. Also Marvin Bush was a director of a firm that was involved with the security of the World Trade Center
F.B.I. until he resigned in August 2001. One of the world's top experts on Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda, he grew to believe that "all the answers" regarding what they needed to destroy Al Qaeda lay in Saudi Arabia. However, starting in January 2001, Bush blocked all efforts by Mr. O'Neill to investigate Saudi ties to bin Laden. In the summer of 2001 O'Neill declared that the main obstacles to his investigation were U.S. oil interests. In late August, a frustrated O'Neill quit the FBI and took a position as head of security for the World Trade Center.

O'Neill became the head of Security at the World Trade Center, and about his first day of work was 9-11. He was outside one of the buildings when he phoned a son and a friend to reassure them he was fine.

O'Neill is reported to have called FBI headquarters, and then re-entered one of the towers to help others. The official story is that O'Neill was inside when the buildings collapsed.

How convenient for the Bush administration that Mr. O'Neill would not only die in the attack, but also that he would make such a call. Not only was the Bush administration's most dangerous critic forever silenced, but he also provided the administration the perfect story to explain his death.
Was WTC 7 an act of ARSON and an act of Government Terrorism?

The Bush and Bin Laden families were linked together through a Texas businessman named James Bath. He invested $50,000 in George II's failed energy company Arbusto as part of its start-up. Because he was an agent for Salem bin Laden, Osama's older half brother, and represented numerous other wealthy Saudis, there was speculation that this money was Saudi money. This investment occurred in 1979. Around that same time, Osama went to the Khyber Pass in Afghanistan and joined up with the mujaheddin and the CIA in their war to oust the Soviet Union from that part of the world. Bath was a friend of George I from their days in the 1960s as members of the Texas Air National Guard. By 1976, Bath was acting as an agent for bin Laden's business interests in Texas, and the $50,000 investment in Arbusto was made in 1979. The bin Ladens cemented their business ties with the Bushes in 1995, when they made a $2million dollar investment in the Carlyle Group, which specializes in investing in defense contractors. Frank Carlucci, Bush I's former Secretary of Defense, is the chair of Carlyle. James Baker, one of the attorneys who argued Bush II's case in the Supreme Court in 2000, and George I are on Carlyle's board. All three have been sent in recent days on diplomatic missions to the Saudi royal family.
Not only did Larry Siulverstein admit he pulled building 7, he made a half billion dollars on the destruction, so it seems did the mortage holders,
bells and whistles link

"As a result, the new owners are not required to make any payments under their lease, but they will be able to collect on the loss of the buildings that collapsed or were otherwise destroyed and damaged in the attacks."

Ostensibly the 'owners' would additionally be the mortgage holders, right? That would be Peter Peterson's large entirely private investment vehicle Blackstone.

First in power in the Nixon admin, like so many others involved in 9-11 activities, Peter Peterson was was made Chair of the NY Fed. Reserve on Jan. 1. 2000 (the NY Fed is the only one in the 'faux federal' system of any massive monetary scale or importance).

His Blackstone corp already fully owns the military contractor TRW, does lots of black ops presumably...

In 2000, Blackstone bought up the WTC7 morgage! It made sure to take the full mortgage instead of all for multiple investors like before. It bought them all out to have the full mortgage on the building.

In 2000, Blackstone invested 25 million dollars in the Bush crime family's Carlyle Corporation, positioned to become the world's largest private military contractor after 9-11.

In 2000, Blackstone invested in Aviall, Inc., the world's largest buyer/seller network corporation of USED AVIATION PARTS.

Peterson's Blackstone has connections with Kissinger Associates...

An angle worth further investigation...

The Bush and Bin Laden families were linked together through a Texas businessman named James Bath. He invested $50,000 in George II's failed energy company Arbusto as part of its start-up. Because he was an agent for Salem bin Laden, Osama's older half brother, and represented numerous other wealthy Saudis, there was speculation that this money was Saudi money. This investment occurred in 1979. Around that same time, Osama went to the Khyber Pass in Afghanistan and joined up with the mujaheddin and the CIA in their war to oust the Soviet Union from that part of the world. Bath was a friend of George I from their days in the 1960s as members of the Texas Air National Guard. By 1976, Bath was acting as an agent for bin Laden's business interests in Texas, and the $50,000 investment in Arbusto was made in 1979. The bin Ladens cemented their business ties with the Bushes in 1995, when they made a $2million dollar investment in the Carlyle Group, which specializes in investing in defense contractors. Frank Carlucci, Bush I's former Secretary of Defense, is the chair of Carlyle. James Baker, one of the attorneys who argued Bush II's case in the Supreme Court in 2000, and George I are on Carlyle's board. All three have been sent in recent days on diplomatic missions to the Saudi royal family.

The Perfect Terrorist Plan to Level The Twin Towers Created In 1976
Our own U.S. Army devised a plan commissioned by Congress to bring down the WTC using commercial airliners and box cutters as weapons

Cheney & Lay:

Documents turned over in the summer of 2003 by the Commerce Department as a result of the Sierra Club's and Judicial Watch's Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, concerning the activities of the Cheney Energy Task Force, contain a map of Iraqi oilfields, pipelines, refineries and terminals, as well as two charts detailing Iraqi oil and gas projects, and "Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts." The documents, dated March 2001, also feature maps of Saudi Arabian and United Arab Emirates oilfields, pipelines, refineries and tanker terminals. There are supporting charts with details of the major oil and gas development projects in each country that provide information on the project's costs, capacity, oil company and status or completion date.

Documented plans of occupation and exploitation predating September 11 confirm heightened suspicion that U.S. policy is driven by the dictates of the energy industry. According to Judicial Watch President, Tom Fitton, "These documents show the importance of the Energy Task Force and why its operations should be open to the public."

When first assuming office in early 2001, President Bush's top foreign policy priority was not to prevent terrorism or to curb the spread of weapons of mass destruction--or any of the other goals he espoused later that year following 9-11. Rather, it was to increase the flow of petroleum from suppliers abroad to U.S. markets. In the months before he became president, the United States had experienced severe oil and natural gas shortages in many parts of the country, along with periodic electrical power blackouts in California. In addition, oil imports rose to more than 50% of total consumption for the first time in history, provoking great anxiety about the security of the country's long-term energy supply. Bush asserted that addressing the nation's "energy crisis" was his most important task as president.

The energy turmoil of 2000-01 prompted Bush to establish a task force charged with developing a long-range plan to meet U.S. energy requirements. With the advice of his close friend and largest campaign contributor, Enron CEO, Ken Lay, Bush picked Vice President Dick Cheney, former Halliburton CEO, to head this group. In 2001 the Task Force formulated the National Energy Policy (NEP), or Cheney Report, bypassing possibilities for energy independence and reduced oil consumption with a declaration of ambitions to establish new sources of oil.

The Bush Administration's struggle to keep secret the workings of Cheney's Energy Task Force has been ongoing since early in the President's tenure.


In the spring of 2001 the severity of the California energy emergency had inspired demands for government action, and Enron had a problem.

Enron CEO Kenneth Lay knew he needed high-level help. So he arranged to meet with a man who had headed a corporation with extensive business ties to Enron and who had been a prime recipient of Enron's political largesse. Vice President Dick Cheney cleared his calendar for an April 17 private meeting with Lay regarding what aides described as "energy policy matters" and "the energy crisis in California." At the meeting Lay handed Cheney a memo that read in part: "The administration should reject any attempt to re-regulate wholesale power markets by adopting price caps...."

The day after he met with Lay, Cheney gave a rare phone interview to the Los Angeles Times that had one recurrent theme: Price caps were out of the question. Dismissing the strategy as "short-term political relief for the politicians," Cheney bluntly declared, "I don't see that as a possibility."

Indeed, so close was the Cheney-Enron relationship that it is entirely reasonable to ask whether ethical and legal lines were crossed. That possibility offers the most realistic explanation for Cheney's refusal to disclose details of his Enron contacts to Congress.

Cheney's refusal to cooperate with investigators--which presidential historian Stanley Kutler refers to as part of a broad "assault on the legal and Constitutional order" by the Bush Administration--forms the most powerful argument for the appointment of a special counsel.


The BBC was told by Niaz Naik, a Pakistani Foreign Secretary, that senior American officials were warning them as early as mid-July, 2001 that military action for mid-October was being planned for Afghanistan.

Say what?

In 1996, the Department of Energy was issuing reports on the desirability of a pipeline through Afghanistan, and in 1998, Unocal testified before the House Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific that this pipeline was crucial to transport Caspian Basin oil to the Indian Ocean.
Such a plan would by necessity be a war plan, and this war plan was actually in place prior to 9/11.

Surely any good war plan requires at its core a starting point, a trigger if you will that provides a good "cover story" to implement it. Clearly you can't just go around invading countries without a good reason...you need to be attacked first, then retaliate.

Was 9/11 simply part of the war plan?

Why wouldn't it have been?

You can't hit the "GO" button without a pretext.

9/11 was the pretext for the invasion of the Middle East - all by design.

So the implementation of such a plan would require BY NECESSITY the implementation of a FALSE FLAG ATTACK ON THE UNITED STATES of such magnitude that it would rival the attack by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor thereby invoking the Pavlovian response which resulted.

If you were looking for anyone to pull off the perfect False Flag Operation on your behalf, there is only one place you would look...Israel's Mossad.

The so-called Energy Crisis in California was entirely fabricated of whole cloth by none other than Ken Lay's Enron - in concert with Poppie Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and even Alan Greenspan.

The only thing more outrageous than these theories is the belief that the timing of 9/11 was a coincidence. It would be a stretch (even for a COINCIDENCE THEORIST), to contend that all of these matters are not directly related.
By Barton Gellman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 23, 2005; Page A04

The Bush administration requested, and Congress rejected, war-making authority "in the United States" in negotiations over the joint resolution passed days after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, according to an opinion article by former Senate majority leader Thomas A. Daschle (D-S.D.) in today's Washington Post.

Daschle's disclosure challenges a central legal argument offered by the White House in defense of the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping of U.S. citizens and permanent residents. It suggests that Congress refused explicitly to grant authority that the Bush administration now asserts is implicit in the resolution.

 http://www.washingtonpost.com/... wp-dyn/ content/ article/ 2005/ 12/ 22/ AR2005122202119.html

And then...a few weeks later...

W A S H I N G T O N, Nov. 1 A group of military scientists is feverishly examining the microscopic spores of anthrax sent to Sen. Tom Daschle for clues to a mystery that could have profound implications for the United States and its ongoing war on terror: Who made it? (Still unsolved, yet evidence says it came from a military lab: seeAnthrax Mystery Solved

"Lab technicians noticed a late-night intruder was tampering with their equipment. A 1992 inquiry found someone was conducting unauthorized research involving anthrax during the evening hours. An audit of the lab showed 27 sets of specimens--including anthrax spores--were unaccounted for or missing. One former commander at the facility said he did not believe any of the missing specimens were ever found.

Dr. Zack is said to be Jewish, and for some this makes him the leading anthrax suspect, particularly among those in Internet discussion groups. They see the harassment of Dr. Assaad, the late night research on anthrax, and the accusatory letter all pointing in Dr. Zack's direction."


September 10, 2001 - Ex. CIA-director, former President, and President Bush's Dad, George H.W. Bush, meets with one of Osama Bin Laden's brothers at a Carlyle business conference in Washington D.C
9/11 - Defense contractor, The Carlyle Group, is hosting a business conference in D.C. in which featured honored guest is one of Osama Bin Laden's brother

9/11 - Workers at Israeli company get text warnings about attacks 2 hours prior
/ http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/04/315848.shtml
Evidence points to 911 was executed by Mossad, with High governmental Pro-Zionist help!

9/11 - Five Raytheon employees are on three of the four hijacked planes

9/11 - Sen. Bob Graham (D-FL) and Rep. Porter Goss (R-FL) -- the chairmen of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees -- along with Sen. John Kyl (R-AZ) and some other members of the House Intelligence Committee are in a meeting at the Capital building with the director of Pakistani intelligence (ISI), Lt. Gen. Mahmud Ahmad, who authorized a $100,000 wire transfer to alleged lead 9/11 hijacker, Mohamed Atta

9/11 - FAA memo says Flight 11 passenger was shot who happened to be a multi-millionaire elite Israeli military commando who understands Arabic and who happened to be sitting directly in front of one of the alleged hijackers

9/11 (8:44 am) - Donald Rumsfeld is in his office at the Pentagon talking about missile defense and the risk of terrorism and predicts there will be a terrorist attack two minutes before the first plane crashes into the WTC

9/11 (9:00 am) - The CIA began an exercise to simulate a plane crashing into one of it's buildings

9/11 - Ann Tatlock, a CEO at the South WTC Tower, is on her way to an early morning charity event at the U.S. Strategic Command Center at Offutt AFB in Nebraska -- where Bush later flew to for "safety" -- hosted by billionaire Warren Buffett and is escorted by military officers into an officer's lounge with a TV and watches the 2nd hijacked plane crash right into her offices

9/11 - A New Jersey homemaker witnesses a group of young men on top of a white van celebrating while they were filming themselves with the burning WTC in the background in which they were later arrested and identified as Israeli citizens -- with some later found to be Israeli spies -- and they were found with large amounts of cash, a box cutter, multiple foreign passports, maps linking them to the blasts, and that bomb-sniffing dogs reacted as if they had detected explosives in their van




9/11 - When Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister of Israel, was asked what the 9/11 attacks meant for relations between the United States and Israel, he replied, "It's very good."

9/11 - Larry Silverstein, the WTC leaseholder, said he decided that the smartest thing to do to the WTC 7 was to "pull it" when a NYFD commander told him that he wasn't sure they were going to be able to contain the fire in the building and said after they made the decision to "pull" the WTC 7, they "watched the building collapse". The term "pull" was used to describe the demolition of the WTC 6 days later

9/11 - White House staff are given the powerful anthrax antibiotic Cipro, a full month before the first cases of anthrax were reported
9/11 - CNN correspondent Jamie McIntyre reporting live from the Pentagon says that there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the building

9/11 - Pentagon is hit right in the middle of only retrofitted section, important budget information located in the damaged area, attack came near the end of fiscal year, fatalities included civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts

September 12, 2001 - Ben Fountain, who worked in the 47th floor of the south tower, says weeks before the attacks they had an "unusual" amount of evacuations from the WTC and says he thinks "they had an inkling something was going on.
Zim International vacates WTCs 15.Apr.2005

Another point that has slipped off the collective 'map' of 9-11 is that the shipper/trader organization, Zim International, broke its lease in the days before 9-11. It vacated rather quickly.

What is interesting about Zim International is that it is a corporation half owned by the Israeli Government.

Another point that is interesting is that despite the cover being "rent was high," why loose $40,000 right then and there for breaking your lease? And is money really all that important when you are half owned by a subsidy-based state like the State of Israel?

September 12, 2001 - Mohammed Atta allegedly calls his father

September 12, 2001 - Before it was even clear who was behind the attacks, Donald Rumsfeld insisted at a Cabinet meeting that Saddam's Iraq should be "a principal target of the first round of terrorism"

September 16, 2001 - Osama Bin Laden releases a press statement denying he had anything to do with the 9/11 attacks

September 16, 2001 - President Bush says Osama Bin Laden is the "prime suspect

September 20, 2001 - FBI Director Robert Mueller admits that some of the alleged 19 hijackers identities are in doubt as at least seven of them appear to be alive

October 5, 2001 - Bob Stevens becomes the first person to die from the anthrax attacks who was a photo editor at American Media, Inc., the parent company who owns the National Enquirer which published a photo of Bush's daughter Jenna shown drunk with a cigarette in her hand falling on top of another girl

October 11, 2001 - Two men from a moving company whom police described as Middle Eastern were detained by federal immigration authorities after being found with detailed video footage of the Sears Tower in Chicago. They were later determined to be Israeli Mossad Agents

October 23, 2001 - Air Force General Richard Myers said the military has never thought of the scenario of terrorists hijacking planes and using them as missiles despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary (despite Arctic Becon's saying such a plan was made by our own military in the Seventies using airliners and boxcutters)
October 26, 2001 - Only a month and a half after 9/11, the 342 page USA PATRIOT ACT is signed into law in which civil liberty groups say it violates the Constitution and fear it will endanger civil liberties


Now can you help me out with a plausible explanation for this:


And this official DEA report:


A counterintelligence investigation by the FBI concluded that at least two of them were in fact Mossad operatives, according to the former American official, who said he was regularly briefed on the investigation by two separate law enforcement officials.

"The assessment was that Urban Moving Systems was a front for the Mossad and operatives employed by it," he said. "The conclusion of the FBI was that they were spying on local Arabs but that they could leave because they did not know anything about 9/11."

However, he added, the bureau was "very irritated because it was a case of so-called unilateral espionage, meaning they didn't know about it."

Spokesmen for the FBI, the Justice Department and the Immigration and Naturalization Service refused to discuss the case. Israeli officials flatly dismissed the allegations as untrue.

However, the former American official said that after American authorities confronted Jerusalem on the issue at the end of last year, the Israeli government acknowledged the operation and apologized for not coordinating it with Washington.

The five men -- Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari and Yaron Shmuel -- were arrested eight hours after the attacks by the Bergen County, N.J., police while driving in an Urban Moving Systems van.

'A Scary Situation' Steven Gordon, the attorney for the five Israeli detainees, acknowledged that his clients' actions on Sept. 11 would easily have aroused suspicions. "You got a group of guys that are taking pictures, on top of a roof, of the World Trade Center. They're speaking in a foreign language. They got two passports on 'em. One's got a wad of cash on him, and they got box cutters. Now that's a scary situation."

While many have denied these events occurred, note these Mainstream Media accounts:

Since their arrest, plenty of speculation has swirled about the case, and what the five men were doing that morning. Eventually, The Forward, a respected Jewish newspaper in New York, reported the FBI concluded that two of the men were Israeli intelligence operatives.

Vince Cannistraro, a former chief of operations for counterterrorism with the CIA who is now a consultant for ABCNEWS, said federal authorities' interest in the case was heightened when some of the men's names were found in a search of a national intelligence database.

Israeli Intelligence Connection?

According to Cannistraro, many people in the U.S. intelligence community believed that some of the men arrested were working for Israeli intelligence. Cannistraro said there was speculation as to whether Urban Moving had been "set up or exploited for the purpose of launching an intelligence operation against radical Islamists in the area, particularly in the New Jersey-New York area."

According to ABC's 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers:

"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem."

The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives.

The FBI seized and developed their photos, one of which shows Sivan Kurzberg flicking a cigarette lighter in front of the smouldering ruins in an apparently celebratory gesture.

The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here's what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:

American security services overnight stopped a car bomb on the George Washington Bridge. The van, packed with explosives, was stopped on an approach ramp to the bridge. Authorities suspect the terrorists intended to blow up the main crossing between New Jersey and New York, Army Radio reported.

TCM Breaking News reported that the van was laden down with tonnes of explosives (13).

What's really intriguing is that ABC's 20/20, the New York Post, and the New Jersey Bergen Record all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel.

But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva), and Yediot America, all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel.

It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating "middle-easterners" in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five.

From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.

The employee, who declined to give his name said: "I was in tears. These guys were joking and that bothered me. These guys were like, "Now America knows what we go through."

A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System's Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System's customers were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities.

It was later confirmed that the five detained Israelis were in fact Mossad agents. They were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. Some of the movers had been kept in solitary confinement for 40 days.

Several of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home.

Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."

How did they know there would be an event to document on 9/11?
In fact, he said, the nature of the investigation changed after the names of two of the five Israelis showed up on a CIA-FBI database of foreign intelligence operatives, he said. At that point, he said, the bureau took control of the investigation and launched a Foreign Counterintelligence Investigation, or FCI.

FBI investigations into possible links to the September 11 attacks are usually carried by the bureau's counterterrorism division, not its counterintelligence division.

"An FCI means not only that it was serious but also that it was handled at a very high level and very tightly," the former official said. That view was echoed by several former FBI officials interviewed.

According to ABCNEWS sources, Israeli and U.S. government officials worked out a deal -- and after 71 days, the five Israelis were taken out of jail, put on a plane, and deported back home.

The men all underwent at least two polygraph tests each, the lawyer added. He said one of the Israelis took the test seven times, a very unusual total according to several polygraph experts interviewed by the Forward. All failed their tests.




What did Ken Lay know and when did he know it?

While Lay is on the stand and under oath, wouldn't it be great fun to ask him all about his meetings with George Bush Sr. and Dick Cheney prior to 9/11?

Wouldn't it be great to ask him if the faux California Energy Crisis which his company manufactured just prior to the 2000 elections was actually a scheme cooked up by he and Poppie Bush to compel Americans to install some oil experts in the White House? But what was to be Lay's reward? After all, he was GW's largest contributor and best friend of Poppie Bush. Poppie never planned on Enron going bust, and that's when things started to fall apart.

Wouldn't if be nice to learn the details of how Lay and Cheney were divvying up the oil fields in Iraq on a big map, even before 9/11?

Wouldn't it be enlightening to hear that Lay knew for a fact that 9/11 was going to happen as the pretext for the war plan which he clearly had knowledge of prior to 9/11?

Why would you sit around countless energy planning meetings dividing up the oil fields of Iraq in advance of 9/11 unless there were a plan in place to make it possible?

Such a plan would by necessity be a war plan, and this war plan was actually in place prior to 9/11.

Surely any good war plan requires at its core a starting point, a trigger if you will that provides a good "cover story" to implement it. Clearly you can't just go around invading countries without a good reason...you need to be attacked first, then retaliate.

Was 9/11 simply part of the war plan?

Why wouldn't it have been?


FYI: Taking "head shots" is a term of the Mossad. It is their tactic for dealing with suicide bombers wearing vests. Mossad has taught this same technique to police forces across the United States.

After Andersen's conviction, the government's Enron investigation gains momentum. After Justice Department criminal division chief Michael Chertoff obtained an indictment against Andersen in March, the prosecutor became the target of public demonstrations by Andersen employees. As the firm's employees confronted the reality that the indictment would drive Andersen out of business, they and others demanded to know why Chertoff wasn't going after his principle target, Enron.

Chertoff's obstruction-of-justice indictment of Andersen quickly broke the firm.



Michael Chertoff, appointed by President Bush to head the Homeland Security Department, may have shielded from criminal prosecution a former client suspected by law enforcement of having funneled millions of dollars directly to Osama Bin Laden while in charge of the U.S. Government's 9.11 investigation.

"At the FBI's insistence, the White House had already forced ICE to give up its Operation Greenquest program investigating terrorism financing -- and forced Ridge to sign a memo pledging to keep his department away from similar investigations."


Chertoff allowed scores of suspected Israeli terrorists and spies to quietly return to Israel. In several cases, Israeli suspects working for phoney moving companies, such as Urban Moving Systems from Weehawken, N.J., were caught driving moving vans which tested positive for explosives. On September 14, Dominic Suter, the owner of the moving company, which was found to be a Mossad front company, fled to Israel after FBI agents requested a second interview.

One group of 5 Israelis was seen on the roof of Urban Moving Systems videotaping and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center. These Israeli agents were returned to Israel on visa violations.

ABC 20/20 Investigation:



FOX News 4-Part Investigative Series:

I mention Alito was reportedly soft on the Moving Van buisnesses and Mafia connected leaders, the same companies that were found to be operating as Israeli front buisnesses, who employed the 5 dancing Israelis, on 911.

These companies were protected by Alito.Why?

Please read how Michael Ledeen's helping prepare the US for War with Iran at
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/01/332303.shtml... and all its comments

CIA Resurrects Dead Bin Laden.WHY?

Posted by: plunger on March 12, 2006 at 02:03pm

Doubt it?
by Sam

Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Press Statement

14 MARCH 2006
James H. Fetzer

We are here because we believe that a profound injustice is being perpetrated in the Courthouse behind us and that the American people deserve to know. We are here because we have made discoveries that suggest the wrong parties have been accused of monstrous crimes and that the American government knows better.

Three of us will speak and present our findings. The second speaker will be Colonel George Nelson, USAF (retired), who will address the crash sites from the perspective of an expert on crash investigations. Our third speaker will be Philip J. Berg, Esquire, a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania.

I am James H. Fetzer, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, an association of academicians and experts dedicated to exposing falsehoods and revealing truths about the events of 9/11. We have been dismayed at the incapacity of the mainstream media to come to grips with even the most elementary aspects of 9/11.

I am McKnight Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota and teach on its Duluth campus. I have spent 35 years teaching logic, critical thinking and scientific reasoning. I am a former Marine Corps officer who is no longer willing to listen to one lie embedded within another from our own government.

Scholars for 9/11 Truth is a non-partisan organization, which has been created in order to take rumor, speculation and especially politics out of research on these events and to place their study on an objective and scientific foundation. Among the more prominent members of the roughly 200 members of the society are:

• Robert M. Bowman: Former Director of the U.S. "Star Wars" Space Defense Program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, who is a former Air Force Lt. Colonel with 101 combat missions;
• Morgan Reynolds: a Texas A & M Professor Emeritus of Economics, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor for President George W. Bush and former Director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis;

• John McMurtry: Professor of Philosophy, University Professor Emeritus Elect, University of Guelph, Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, and the author of six books dealing with public policy issues;

• Wayne Madsen: Investigative journalist and syndicated columnist, a former communications security analyst with the NSA, a former intelligence officer in the Marine Corps and a Senior Fellow of the Electronic Privacy Information Center; and,

• Andreas von Buelow: Former assistant German defense minister, director of the German Secret Service, minister for research and technology, and member of the German Parliament for 25 years.

Our members include physicists and mechanical engineers, pilots and aeronautical engineers, and others from an enormous range of backgrounds. We have made very significant discoveries that we are reporting to the country today. Unless I state differently, everyone I mention today is a member of this organization.

According to the official account, the impact of aircraft combined with fires that they ignited were responsible for the collapse of the Twin Towers in New York City; a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon; and, after its passengers heroically sought to regain control, Flight 93 crashed in Pennsylvannia. That's is the official story. That's what our government has told us.

On the basis of our own research, we can state categorically that the official scenario is false, not merely in its specific details but in its most general features. The towers did not fall from aircraft impacts and collateral fires; no Boeing 757 appears to have hit the Pentagon; and Flight 93 is a mystery.

Frank DeMartini, project manager for the WTC's construction, who died on 9/11, explained long ago that the towers were designed with sophisticated load-redis- tribution capabilities, where the impact of aircraft on the buildings would be "like sticking a pencil through mosquito netting". The planes did not cause the towers to crash. If the planes were not responsible, perhaps it was the fires.

Laws of nature cannot be violated and cannot be changed. It is thus of great significance that the melting point of steel is approximately 2,800*F, but the highest temperature attainable by jet fuel fires is 1,800*F, 1,000* too low to have caused melting to occur. Perhaps therefore the steel simply weakened.

Kevin Ryan, then employed by Underwriters Laboratory, wrote a letter to the NIST explaining that the steel used in the buildings had been certified up to 2,000*F for up to six hours before it would even have significantly weakened. But, by his estimate, the fires only burned at around 500*F and, as even the government has acknowledged, one tower fell in less than an hour, the other in 1 and 1/2.

There are several signs that the fires did not cause their fall. Most of the jet fuel was consumed in gigantic fireballs when the planes hit the buildings and the fires were starved of oxygen. One of the "smoking guns" of 9/11 thus turns out to be the billowing black cloulds of smoke, which indicate that these fires were oxygen-depleted and therefore were not burning at high temperatures.

A 1975 fire in WTC1, moreover, lasted for more than three hours at far higher temperatures and consumed 65% of the 11th floor, yet the building did not fall. If the fires had burned hot enough and long enough to weaken the steel, then, since the fires were distributed non-uniformly, the affected floors would have sagged and fallen, gradually and asymmetrically, a very different scenario than the simultaneous and complete collapse that occurred at the rate of free fall.

Steven Jones, Professor of Physics at Brigham Young University, has determined that the collapse of the buildings, including their fall at the same rate as a grand piano would have taken had it been released from the top at the same time, beyond the impact of the planes and the modest fires required tremendous energy of precisely the kind produced by controlled demolitions. His best guess as to the explosives used is that they were probably an enhanced form of thermate.

Some forms of thermate have an astonishing capacity to cut through steel at temperatures in excess of 5,000*F, which would explain the surprising pools of molten metal that were discovered in the subbasements of the Twin Towers three, four and five weeks after their collapse, which could only have been produced as effects of extremely high temperatures and not from the fall of the buildings.

Judy Wood, a mechanical engineer from Clemson, has studied alternative models of their collapse and has found that, for them to have come down so rapidly, there cannot have been any resistance between one floor and the next, which means that tremendous explosives had to have been used to blow out one floor under another. And, indeed, in some footage of the towers' fall, you can even see them go off.

The second and more important "smoking gun", therefore, turns out to be those enormous clouds of dust, which were created by the pulverization of the concrete flooring material into very fine particles, and steel beams being tossed outward and even upward by extraordinary forces. This did not happen as a result of the impacts nor was it an effect of the fires. It required a separate and powerful cause.

David Ray Griffin, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy of Religion and Theology, Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University, has noticed a peculiar omission from The 9/11 Commission Report, which is that it completely ignores the collapse of a third steel-structure high rise building in the WTC, which was WTC7, a 47-story building of remarkably robust constuction. This building fell at 5:25 PM, some eight hours after the WTC1 and WTC2 collapsed.

Larry Silverstein, who leased the WTC, reported during an interview that he had suggested to a fire official that, since there had already been so much death and destruction, perhaps the best thing to do would be to "pull it". He said they made the decision to pull and they watched it come down. "Pulling" is a term in construction for bringing a building down by a controlled demolition.

What is most striking about this event is that WTC7 was hit by no aircraft at all and had only a few small fires. It is striking that, if these three fell as a result of fires, it would be the first time in the history of structural engineering that had happened. Notice, moreover, for WTC7 to be "pulled", it had to be the case that those explosives were already present in the building. And if that was true of WTC7, then perhaps it was also true of WTC1 and WTC2.

Indeed, there are multiple reports of unusual "security lapses" in the Twin Towers during the two weeks before 9/11. Sections of floors were shut off and normal security practices were breached, while teams of "engineers" were given free access. Professor Jones has estimated that it would have taken 40 men only 10 trips each to plant sufficient thermate to bring one of them down.

Other discoveries by members of the society are less dramatic but are equally telling. Nila Sagadevan, an aeronautical engineer and a pilot, for example, has explained why it would have been impossible for persons at their meager stage of training to have piloted these aircraft at high altitudes using only instrument controls and have successfully navigated to their intended targets.

A. K. Dewdney, a mathematician and computer scientist from the University of Western Ontario, has conducted a series of extensive tests using a variety of cell phones on several general aviation aircraft and discovered that it would have been impossible to have established stable cell phone connections at the speeds of 500 knots and altitudes of 30,000 feet that were involved. So even the heroics of the passengers on Flight 93 appear to have been but a fantasy.

What this means is that the wrong parties have been accused of the monstrous crimes committed on 9/11. The country appears to have been hijacked, not by a group of 19 Islamic fundamentalists under the control of a man hiding in a cave in Afghanistan, but by a gang of neo-conservatives right here in front of our very eyes, who have used special effects and propaganda to deceive us. To now discuss the crash sites, it is a pleasure to introduce Colonel George Nelson, USAF (retired), who will comment on that aspect of the official story.

. . .

It is now my pleasure to introduce Philip J. Berg, Attorney at Law, Former Deputy Attorney General, former candidate for Governor, Lt. Governor, and the U.S. Senate from Pennsylvania, who represents William Rodriguez, a 9/11 eyewitness, in a RICO lawsuit pending against George Bush, Dick Cheney and 53 other other Defendants in Federal Court, Southern District of New York.

. . .

One final observation. The administration appears to have resorted to the use of violence and threats of violence to instill fear into the American people in order to manipulate us for political purposes. If you check it, you will discover this is the definition of "terrorism". So what we have discovered is that the American government has been practicing terrorism on the American people. We believe the American people are entitled to know.

Alexandria, VA


Wayne Madsen

Historical Redux

The United States government has embarked on a dangerous program to bring military warfare to cyberspace. This will result in threats to information privacy and security barely conceived of some twenty years ago. There is also great interest by some members of private industry to see information warfare expand into a major expenditure area for the military budget. It is fitting to reflect on the words of one former American president who was no stranger to the military agenda:

• "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex . . . We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted."
President Eisenhower - Farewell Address, 17 January 1961

NSDD 145/NTISSP No. 2 Precursors: Government Regulation of Private Sector Security?

Over the past two decades the government has shown a willingness to extend its brand of information security and privacy controls to the private sector. It has consistently failed to recognize that what is important to private industry, namely customer satisfaction, stockholder profits, and availability and integrity of data, are not so important to the government - which generally operates behind a veil of secrecy and denial of access to information.

During the 1980s, the Reagan administration attempted to extend governmental information secrecy requirements to the private sector when it issued National Security Decision Directive 145 (followed by its implementation order - National Telecommunications and Information System Security Policy Memorandum Number 2.) By attempting to place a national security caveat of "unclassified but sensitive" on certain commercial information, Congress deemed the policy to be unconstitutional (a violation of the First Amendment right to free speech).

The Reagan policy was largely discredited. However, a small number of Reagan administration defense policy officials, operating under the guise of private sector Pentagon special task force members, managed in the early 1990s to get information warfare and "critical infrastructure protection" high on the Clinton administration's policy agenda. Their intent, and the intent of the administration, is clear. Rhetoric aside, the government seeks to carve out for itself a major role in information security and privacy policy in those private industry sectors connected in any way to the information infrastructure.

In practical Orwellian "Newspeak," the National Security Agency, the chief eavesdropper of private communications in the world, talks of the need to protect the privacy of commercial electronic transactions. Responsibility for civilian infrastructure protection has fallen into the hands of an agency that has historically shown its disdain for the civil rights and liberties of American citizens - the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

The Clinton administration has sent out mixed signals on where it intends to go with its critical infrastructure protection policies. In this regard, one must merely read the statements of members of the administration.

"We cannot mandate our Goals through Government regulation."

President Clinton, May 1999

"We cannot mandate our goals through Government regulation."

President Clinton, May 1999

"We cannot mandate our Goals through Government regulation."

President Clinton, May 1999

"If the private sector fails to step up to the plate and implement government-level security controls, one option would be government regulations that will require them to do so."

John S. Tritak, CIAO, 14 April 2000 , Washington, DC

Ethical Implications of Information Warfare

It is clear that the warfare planners of the Pentagon and its contractors feel an urgent need to bolster the cyber defenses of the United States in order to launch offensive information warfare attacks on other countries.

• Fiduciary Responsibilities - By agreeing to share internal information with the government, banks may be compromising their fiduciary responsibilities with their customers. The speed at which several banks agreed to set up a financial Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC) with the government is emblematic of the problem. According to an American Bankers Association (ABA) source, the NSA approached the banking organization with a proposal to set up its ISAC complete with NSA-developed technical monitoring capabilities. The ABA rejected the offer.

The FBI also approached the banking group and offered assistance in creating an ISAC monitoring capability for banking networks. The FBI's system was based on a lower level of technology than that offered by NSA. The involvement of such agencies with sensitive banking systems without a clear criminal predicate, backed up by judicial warrants, represents a severe violation of the constitutional rights of American citizens.

• War criminality vis a vis civilian targets - In late 1999, a legal team at the Defense Department cautioned against the use of computer hacking and disinformation in offensive information campaigns. In a document titled "An Assessment of International Legal Issues in Information Operations," the Pentagon's Office of General Counsel opined that it was dangerous for the military to contemplate launching information warfare attacks on banks, stock exchanges, and universities. The lawyers warned of the possibility of a ripple effect on civilian populations and unintended consequences for neutral or allied nations. As for disinformation campaigns contemplated by some within the Pentagon and intelligence community, the Pentagon report was straightforward: "it might be possible to use computer morphing techniques to create an image of the enemy's chief of state informing his troops that an armistice or cease-fire agreement had been signed. If false, this also would be a war crime." [1]

• "Bounce back" effect - There is a huge threat that if the United States launches an information warfare attack (and there is clear evidence to indicate it did exactly that against Yugoslavia in the Balkans War), the United States could either face a retaliatory attack (for which it is much more vulnerable than a majority of the world's nations) or it could become a victim of its own cyber-weaponry. For example, if the Pentagon were to launch a virus attack against an opponent, how could the military ensure such digital contagion would not affect the systems of the United States, its allies, its friends and neutral nations? At this time, the Pentagon cannot make any such credible assurances.

• A new international weapons race - In the aftermath of the Cold War, many nations can ill-afford to try and match the United States in developing information warfare weapons and defenses. Many of the world's nations, including Russia, are in sever debt situations. There expenditures on such fool-hardy notions as information warfare comes at the expense of social services, education, modernization, and international debt payments.

• Military role in domestic affairs - The Founding Fathers of the United States and law makers throughout the history of the country, have stressed the need to keep the military out of domestic affairs as much as possible. In the aftermath of the Civil War, when the military attained an omnipotent domestic law enforcement role, the Congress passed a law that forbade the military from getting involved in domestic law enforcement. Today, the promoters of information warfare are calling for a greater domestic law enforcement role for the military and its associated intelligence agencies. This development is clearly not in the best traditions of the United States as a democratic nation based on the rule of law, not on the whims of an Army general or a Navy admiral.

Privacy Implications of Information Warfare

Expenditures on information warfare and critical infrastructure protection have included the establishment of a number of network monitoring and surveillance systems. It is questionable whether these surveillance networks operate within the framework of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, namely those dealing with privacy of communications and the protection against self-incrimination.

Some of the more ubiquitous surveillance networks are listed below:

• Information Sharing and Analysis Centers (ISACs) in banking and finance, telecommunications, information services and computer sectors
• Federal Intrusion Detection Network (FIDNET),
• Regional Information Sharing System Network (RISSNET)
• Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN)
• Similar surveillance and monitoring systems in other countries

Perception Management

The military and the intelligence agencies have a vested interest in whipping up public support for their information warfare and cyber-protection initiatives. They seek first to create a "fear mentality." By instilling the fear of "cyber doom" in the minds of the general public, the agencies can then focus on curtailing those civil liberties and privacy rights that represent impediments to their agendas. Recently, this has resulted in an attempt by the Justice Department to amend the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, the result of which will make it harder for the citizen to gain access to government information that is in the public interest, e.g., environmental, health, and safety information.

The military/intelligence consortium also seeks to control the dissemination of news in order to frame the debate on its own terms. They get the media to hype up existent or non-existent threats and military exercises reminiscent of the Cold War. In the past few years these have included exercises with names like ELIGIBLE RECEIVER, MOONLIGHT MAZE, and EVIDENT SURPRISE.

The propaganda elements within the military/intelligence complex are also very open about their need to control new media like the Internet and worldwide satellite broadcasts. This has resulted in military psychological warfare (PSYOPS) programs like the U.S. State Department's International Public Information (IPI) system, a program designed to place U.S. government propaganda in the international media, including Internet news sources, and a Pentagon program that successfully placed PSYOPS interns within the news organizations of CNN and National Public Radio.


an accessory to the crime. The Bush family are modern Borgias -- cruel "human locusts" who devour and ruin everything in their path.

Bush, upper right, resembles the man looking the opposite way from all the other witnesses to JFK's assassination.

Another view of GHW Bush (second from left) a few months after Nov. 22 murder of President Kennedy. The hairline and pose identical to that of man in front of Dallas school book building.


Standing Your Ground Against the Info War Agenda

There is one potent defense against the information warfare/critical infrastructure protection agenda and that is the political one. By using the democratic political process to deny funding for these various info war programs, the military and intelligence agencies cannot implement their agendas. Without funding, military contractors will lose interest in the subject and wander off to some other watering holes or grazing fields to satiate themselves. Therefore, it is important to organize political opposition to these programs at the national levels (U.S. Congress, British House of Commons, Russian Duma, German Bundestag, Japanese Diet, Israeli Knesset) and the supranational levels (European Parliament, Council of Europe, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, United Nations). The stakes are too important not to act.


Secret US plans for Iraq's oil

By Greg Palast
Reporting for Newsnight

The Bush administration made plans for war and for Iraq's oil before the 9/11 attacks, sparking a policy battle between neo-cons and Big Oil, BBC's Newsnight has revealed.

Iraqi-born Falah Aljibury says US Neo-Conservatives planned to force a coup d'etat in Iraq
Two years ago today - when President George Bush announced US, British and Allied forces would begin to bomb Baghdad - protesters claimed the US had a secret plan for Iraq's oil once Saddam had been conquered.

In fact there were two conflicting plans, setting off a hidden policy war between neo-conservatives at the Pentagon, on one side, versus a combination of "Big Oil" executives and US State Department "pragmatists".

"Big Oil" appears to have won. The latest plan, obtained by Newsnight from the US State Department was, we learned, drafted with the help of American oil industry consultants.

Insiders told Newsnight that planning began "within weeks" of Bush's first taking office in 2001, long before the September 11th attack on the US.

We saw an increase in the bombing of oil facilities and pipelines [in Iraq] built on the premise that privatisation is coming

Mr Falah Aljibury
An Iraqi-born oil industry consultant, Falah Aljibury, says he took part in the secret meetings in California, Washington and the Middle East. He described a State Department plan for a forced coup d'etat.

Mr Aljibury himself told Newsnight that he interviewed potential successors to Saddam Hussein on behalf of the Bush administration.

Secret sell-off plan

The industry-favoured plan was pushed aside by a secret plan, drafted just before the invasion in 2003, which called for the sell-off of all of Iraq's oil fields. The new plan was crafted by neo-conservatives intent on using Iraq's oil to destroy the Opec cartel through massive increases in production above Opec quotas.

Former Shell Oil USA chief stalled plans to privatise Iraq's oil industry
The sell-off was given the green light in a secret meeting in London headed by Fadhil Chalabi shortly after the US entered Baghdad, according to Robert Ebel.

Mr Ebel, a former Energy and CIA oil analyst, now a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, told Newsnight he flew to the London meeting at the request of the State Department.

Mr Aljibury, once Ronald Reagan's "back-channel" to Saddam, claims that plans to sell off Iraq's oil, pushed by the US-installed Governing Council in 2003, helped instigate the insurgency and attacks on US and British occupying forces.

"Insurgents used this, saying, 'Look, you're losing your country, you're losing your resources to a bunch of wealthy billionaires who want to take you over and make your life miserable,'" said Mr Aljibury from his home near San Francisco.

"We saw an increase in the bombing of oil facilities, pipelines, built on the premise that privatisation is coming."

Privatisation blocked by industry

Philip Carroll, the former CEO of Shell Oil USA who took control of Iraq's oil production for the US Government a month after the invasion, stalled the sell-off scheme.

Mr Carroll told us he made it clear to Paul Bremer, the US occupation chief who arrived in Iraq in May 2003, that: "There was to be no privatisation of Iraqi oil resources or facilities while I was involved."

Amy Jaffee says oil companies fear a privatisation would exclude foreign firms
Ariel Cohen, of the neo-conservative Heritage Foundation, told Newsnight that an opportunity had been missed to privatise Iraq's oil fields.

He advocated the plan as a means to help the US defeat Opec, and said America should have gone ahead with what he called a "no-brainer" decision.

Mr Carroll hit back, telling Newsnight, "I would agree with that statement. To privatize would be a no-brainer. It would only be thought about by someone with no brain."

New plans, obtained from the State Department by Newsnight and Harper's Magazine under the US Freedom of Information Act, called for creation of a state-owned oil company favoured by the US oil industry. It was completed in January 2004 under the guidance of Amy Jaffe of the James Baker Institute in Texas.

Formerly US Secretary of State, Baker is now an attorney representing Exxon-Mobil and the Saudi Arabian government.

View segments of Iraq oil plans at  http://www.GregPalast.com

Questioned by Newsnight, Ms Jaffe said the oil industry prefers state control of Iraq's oil over a sell-off because it fears a repeat of Russia's energy privatisation. In the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union, US oil companies were barred from bidding for the reserves.

Ms Jaffe says US oil companies are not warm to any plan that would undermine Opec and the current high oil price: "I'm not sure that if I'm the chair of an American company, and you put me on a lie detector test, I would say high oil prices are bad for me or my company."

The former Shell oil boss agrees. In Houston, he told Newsnight: "Many neo conservatives are people who have certain ideological beliefs about markets, about democracy, about this, that and the other. International oil companies, without exception, are very pragmatic commercial organizations. They don't have a theology."

A State Department spokesman told Newsnight they intended "to provide all possibilities to the Oil Ministry of Iraq and advocate none".

Greg Palast's film - the result of a joint investigation by Newsnight and Harper's Magazine - will be broadcast on Thursday, 17 March, 2005.

 link to www.rawstory.com

White House: Did President knowingly sign law that didn't pass?

Published: Wednesday March 15, 2006

Print This | Email This

Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) has alleged in a letter to White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card that President Bush signed a version of the Budget Reconciliation Act that, in effect, did not pass the House of Representatives.

Further, Waxman says there is reason to believe that the Speaker of the House called President Bush before he signed the law, and alerted him that the version he was about to sign differed from the one that actually passed the House. If true, this would put the President in willful violation of the U.S. Constitution.

The full text of the letter follows:

March 15, 2006

The Honorable Andrew Card

Chief of Staff

The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. Card:

On February 8, 2006, President Bush signed into law a version of the Deficit Reduction Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 2005 that was different in substance from the version that passed the U.S. House of Representatives. Legal scholars have advised me that the substantive differences between the versions - which involve $2 billion in federal spending - mean that this bill did not meet the fundamental constitutional requirement that both Houses of Congress must pass any legislation signed into law by the President.

I am writing to learn what the President and his staff knew about this constitutional defect at the time the President signed the legislation.

Detailed background about the legislation and its constitutional defects are contained in a letter I sent last month to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, which I have enclosed with this letter.[1] In summary, the House-passed version of the legislation required the Medicare program to lease "durable medical equipment," such as wheelchairs, for seniors and other beneficiaries for up to 36 months, while the version of the legislation signed by the President limited the duration of these leases to just 13 months. As the Congressional Budget Office reported, this seemingly small change from 36 months to 13 months has a disproportionately large budgetary impact, cutting Medicare outlays by $2 billion over the next five years.[2]

I understand that a call was made to the White House before the legislation was signed by the President advising the White House of the differences between the bills and seeking advice about how to proceed. My understanding is that the call was made either by the Speaker of the House to the President or by the senior staff of the Speaker to the senior staff of the President.

I would like to know whether my understanding is correct. If it is, the implications are serious.

The Presentment Clause of the U.S. Constitution states that before a bill can become law, it must be passed by both Houses of Congress.[3] When the President took the oath of office, he swore to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States," which includes the Presentment Clause. If the President signed the Reconciliation Act knowing its constitutional infirmity, he would in effect be placing himself above the Constitution.

I do not raise this issue lightly. Given the gravity of the matter and the unusual circumstances surrounding the Reconciliation Act, Congress and the public need a straightforward explanation of what the President and his staff knew on February 8, when the legislation was signed into law.


Henry A. Waxman Ranking Minority Member


[1] See Letter from Rep. Henry A. Waxman to Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (Feb. 14, 2006).

[2] See Letter from CBO Acting Director Donald Marron to Rep. John M. Spratt, Jr. (Feb. 13, 2006).

[3] U.S. Constitution, Article I, � 7.


Whistleblowers being punished:

*Morgan Reynolds, Bush's own former top Labor Department economist, who has spoken with blunt honesty about the Administration's complicity in the murder of thousands of Americans in the WTC demolition. Real heroism is puncturing the bubble of lies, finding your own voice, and assuming responsibility for truth, for reality.

Conspiracy and Closed Minds on 9/11
Morgan Reynolds
March 2006

While more Americans doubt the 9/11 story every week, evidence abounds that many have a mental block against rational examination of the evidence about 9/11. The possibility that it was an inside job is a non-starter for them. Programmed "cut outs" insure that 9/11 doubts are consigned to the "conspiracy" closet.

Last June I was explaining the fuss over my 9/11 article to a family member who shall remain anonymous and he interrupted and said, "I don't want to talk about it." Millions join him in that sentiment. By implication they might as well say: "I'd rather cling to the official 9/11 myth" = "If mass murderers run free, I'm fine with that" = "If 9/11 was an inside job, then I'm ruled by monsters and I might have to do something about it, I'd rather watch Paris Hilton."

Where does this passive attitude come from? Causes are many but American indoctrination has two sides that figure prominently in the explanation:
• Belief in "American Exceptionalism"
• Disbelief in conspiracy

The first belief massages the American ego that we are heroes, always the good guys in history, and we can trust our government to be the same. The second steers us clear of subversive theories and thwarts connecting the dots. American exceptionalism is Civics 101, the Disneyfication of U.S. history, the "we're so good" formula, "those stupid romances commonly called history."

Like no other nation in history, we are an unparalleled success, goes the story. With American self-esteem unrivalled, denial about 9/11 is hardly surprising. Conventional wisdom, in effect, says Yes, criminal gangs have ruled in other nations from time to time, perhaps always, but it has never happened here and cannot happen here. Evidence to the contrary is bogus, I do not have to even look at it. For one thing, I vote. We are the world's greatest duh-mocracy. In fact, I voted for Bush-Cheney (or that other skull-and-bones candidate from Yale, I forget). I am fully invested with the regime and I'm not a criminal or traitor, so Bush-Cheney must not be either.

After all, we the people are the government. Criminals and traitors do not look like us either, they look like Arabs, Germans, Japanese, Chinese.

Besides, conspiracy theories are little more than a symptom a mental disease. Such asinine theories stem from delusion and paranoia, not objective reality. On its face, it is preposterous to believe that the U.S. government would attack its own people. History is about accidents, bungling, lone nuts, chaos and coincidence, not planning, cause-and-effect, execution and cover-ups.

False Flag Terrorism
Americans know a great deal that just is not so. The hidden history of false-flag terrorism is key, followed by trained aversion to conspiracy. When bad things happen on a large scale, chances are that an important group of people wanted them to happen and made them happen.

Governments throughout history have provoked or staged attacks on their own people to serve the powers behind the throne ("the money power"), glorify themselves, engage in vast government spending, reward friends, exert domestic control, stimulate the juices of war, annex neighbors and pursue vast geostrategic rearrangements (the "global domination project"). A few examples:

• Nero burned Rome to blame the Christans A.D. 64
• US provoked Mexican-American war 1846
• USS Maine sinking 1898
• Lusitania sinking 1915
• Reichstag fire 1933
• Hitler's staged attack on the Gleiwitz radio station 1939
• The "surprise attack" at Pearl Harbor 1941
• Bay of Pigs conspiracy 1961
• Operation Northwoods 1962
• LBJ's Gulf of Tonkin conspiracy 1964
• Kuwaiti baby incubator hoax 1991
• Bush Jr.'s 9/11, yellow cake and WMD scams

Ruthless though plotters be, the basic principle "is as mundane as insurance fraud," as Webster G. Tarpley writes (9/11 Synthetic Terror, 2005, p. 104), and nicely illustrated by the obscure hoax that started World War II. Hitler wanted to invade Poland but knew the German majority did not support war, so a group of hapless German convicts was dressed up in Polish army uniforms (by Tarpley's account, also see these variations), marched to the Gleiwitz radio station, machine gunned to death, arranged as if storming the building, and Nazi agents read an anti-German statement in Polish declaring Polish forces had invaded Gleiwitz and taken over the radio station. With this farce and related border stunts, Hitler invaded Poland the next day, September 1, 1939. "Wag the dog" anyone?

Errors about Conspiracy
Many Americans know that the JFK, RFK, MLK and other assassinations were inside jobs, and Nixon's Watergate and Reagan's Iran-Contra are proven conspiracies with criminal convictions. Blatant government murder of U.S. citizens occurred at Waco, Ruby Ridge and the Oklahoma City bombing. Yet fools and liars argue that the scale of 9/11 was too big to be an inside job because it would involve so many people. A conspirator would surely squeal and we would hear about it, goes the argument, and that has not happened.

JFK's triangulation murder involved hundreds and nobody "ratted" that out in any substantial way, although Jack Ruby was close before he was found dead in his cell and dozens of deaths surrounded the case. Here's how large, inside conspiracies work:

• Conspiracies—partnerships in crime—are common: a corner drug deal is a conspiracy and one in four federal prosecutions include a conspiracy charge.
• Hundreds rather than thousands probably were necessary to pull off the 9/11 psychological operation.
• Many conspirators are ideologues committed to the idea that the 9/11 hoax would serve the interests of the nation. Worthy ends justify murderous means to this crowd. The human cost of 9/11 turned out to be "only" a month's highway fatality toll and served the magnificent ends of starting a global war on terror, two invasions and more to come, billions more in defense spending, torture, new agencies, "Patriot" controls, domestic spying, enormous new contracts, more debt and many other attractive consequences.
• Many participants are cunning sociopaths (amoral) with the mindset of stone cold killers. They wear a suit or military uniform but have no respect for the lives of the "little people." They are ruthless, witness the fool in the White House: "But all in all, it's been a fabulous year for Laura and me," a tone-deaf president declared in a December, 2001 interview.
• Only the trustworthy are at the center of the hub-spoke-and-wheel compartmentalization necessary in a complex conspiracy. Only the arrogant few at the hub know the big picture before hand.
• The most secretive regime in U.S. history puts a huge premium on personal loyalty and gets it.
• Most participants did not know in advance how "over-the-top" the twin tower demolitions was going to be. That job probably was contracted out to ruthless foreigners. Once done, it's too late to get out.
• Any participant would hesitate to squeal after the event because disbelief, disgrace and grief would follow, at a minimum, anyway. The major media, inside 9/11 from the start, would discredit squealers, as necessary.
• Risk-taking behavior is always greater in groups than for lone individuals (psychology 101).
• Once involved in the plot, everyone is "in for good.'
• Conspirators face no threat of arrest, prosecution and punishment by the government's justice system, a proven fact since government and media obstructed and trashed New Orleans district attorney Jim Garrison's JFK investigation and prosecution.
• Controllers discipline participants through $billions in black budgets and drug money, death threats, assassination and black mail.
• Blatant and repeated resistance against truthful investigations, aided by obstruction of justice and abetted by media silencio,prove there is a lot to hide.

Consider one control technique among many: a very high CIA official died a few years ago and on good authority I know that he had a 7/24 CIA presence to protect against a deathbed confession in front of Hospice personnel. "I'm not into conspiracy theories," says filmmaker Michael Moore, "only those that are true."

The fundamental difficulty is not really disbelief about the ability to keep conspiracy secrets but disbelief that U.S. government officials could really collaborate in attacking America and take all those innocent lives at the World Trade Center. This is naοve. First, government is the instrument of social compulsion. Organized force is what government does. The belief that soft-hearted people rise to the top in government is akin to the belief that softies were whipping masters on slave plantations.

Second, setting WTC bombs could easily have been contracted out to Mossad, otherwise known as "executioner to the world." Killing? It's what we do (because this is "life or death for Israel," blah, blah).

Third, people are taught that they control their government and live in a duh-mocracy but all governments are run by insiders, usually permanent and dominated by the paymasters. When policy or personnel really matter, international bankers call the tune for modern governments daily dependent on them for new loans and refinance of the old. These financiers look out for themselves and believe in a New World Order, a one-government world, and have no allegiance to America or its founding principles.

Fourth, the U.S. military oath requires an oath-taker to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." The enemy within the gate is key today, whether called conspiracy or not, not the enemy outside.

Skepticism about conspiracy, small or large, is somewhat beside the point in the case of 9/11 because the official Osama-and-Nineteen-Young-Arabs (ONYA) conspiracy tale is so farcical and impossible. Nearly everyone in America has easy access to the internet and hundreds of websites expose the 9/11 fraud. The analysis is out there and in a few dozen books, although the mainstream media ignores it all.

Only government could have pulled off a psy-op this big, not a rag-tag band of Arab incompetents with no visible means of support repeatedly running afoul of law enforcement in the field. All the other intelligence services and governments know the real story about who did 9/11. It is like an elephant in the living room, studiously ignored by insiders who keep quiet about it. After thorough exposure via the Downing Street memo and other irrefutable evidence about the Bush-Cheney lies to justify invading Iraq, it takes a lot to remain ignorant about 9/11. It is not about a conspiracy too large to work. Ignorance increasingly has to be willful.



web www.arcticbeacon.com

Former FBI Agent And Whistle Blower's Son Framed For Murder He Didn't Commit
John Peeler has "all the dirty goods" on the U.S. government's covert operations to kill New World Order foes, as well as the hidden details behind Waco, Oklahoma City and 9/11.
18 Mar 2006


Strange Illuminati Numbers: Former FBI Agent Jailed For 33-99 years For Uncovering White House Connection To Illegal Drug Trafficking. Family Says Orders Must Have Come Down From "Daddy" Bush Himself To Have Agent Framed
Richard Taus wanted to go public in the 1980's about illegal government sponsored drug trafficking he documented while serving as an FBI agent. Refusing to backdown to inside pressure, it led to trumped up charges of child abuse he claims are "totally false," leading to a long prison term.
13 Mar 2006


Former DEA Agent Wants George H. Bush, Negroponte And Other Higher-Ups Held Accountable For Illegal Drug Smuggling
Cele Castillo made headlines in the 1980's for exposing illegal government-sponsored cocaine trafficking. Although the responsible parties were never brought to justice, Castillo is still speaking out loud and strong in order to save his country.
5 Mar 2006

FBI Harasses Informant of Former Agent John O'Neill
Janet Parker says agents discredited her association with O'Neill and discounted she saw London bombing suspect in Seattle in 2002. Agents told her she needed psychiatric help and was fabricating story for public attention. Parker denies FBI allegations.
18 Sep 2005  link to www.arcticbeacon.com

Close Informant And Friend Of Former FBI Agent John O'Neill, Killed on 9/11, Tells How FBI Higher-Ups 'Shut Him Down' Letting 9/11 Happen
Janet Parker was helping O'Neill get close to a known terrorist kingpin in the months preceeding 9/11, but says FBI officials did everything in their power to block O'Neill.
16 Aug 2005

By Greg Szymanski

If these people are not removed their plan for endless war will continue:
US/Israel plan nuclear attack on Iran to control oil and defend the dollar

US and Israeli governments plan a military attack against Iran, possibly using nuclear bombs [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], possibly this month (March 2006) for reasons including: stopping the planned opening of an international oil-petrochemical-gas stock exchange for oil trade in euros [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]; control of Khuzestan province [1] [2] [3] where most Iranian oil lies, on the border with Iraq (US war plan OPLAN 1002-04); to distract attention from USA domestic political problems; and for Christian fundamentalist reasons - Bush says he was just following God's orders when he ordered the attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq.

The official excuse for the attack is the possible nuclear weapons program in Iran: ex-CIA agents Paul Pillar and Ellen Laipson as well as retired United Nations weapons inspector Hans Blix state that if Iran were really trying to build atom bombs, then the most effective way to stop this would be a guarantee from the US and Israel not to attack Iran.

Key facts:

Iran has not (yet) violated the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), though the National Intelligence Community in the USA estimates that Iran could build nuclear bombs in about 10 years' time, and it seems that nuclear proliferator (US ally) Pakistan gave some help to Iran to do this [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
USA, France and the UK grossly violate Article VI of the NPT, which requires disarmament
Germany violates Articles I and II of the NPT by nuclear sharing
Israel has about 75-200 nuclear bombs and has neither signed nor ratified the NPT, but it is a member of the IAEA - the agency making inspections for the NPT
in June 2005, the USA blackmailed IAEA chief El Baradei to either "get tough" on Iran or lose his job
info: iranbodycount | wikipedia | Iranian blogs | Workers' Left Unity Iran
action: campaigniran | defendiran | stopwaroniran | medialens.org | StopWar.org.uk | Global Days of Action 18-20 March

And the Military industrial dictatorship will have cancelled the Bill of Rights.

Who made this plan? 20.Mar.2006 02:14


Who made this plan?
Ugly Americans, Dancing Israelis and the crown
are endlessly making war on the whole world.

By John Kaminski

Americans aren't the good guys anymore. Hollow TV pitchmen still insist our boys are dying for their country, but more and more people know that those lives are being wasted on corporate profits, deliberately squandered for somebody's twisted big score scheme.

And you know who's making the money. The very pervs who are orchestrating all these wars. Repeat after me: Carlyle Group.

Maybe the most frightening thing is that so many Americans are going along with the scam. And the more I find out about American history — from George Washington butchering French traders in their sleep on Christmas Eve — maybe they always have.

How many thousands of supposedly responsible Americans are keeping their mouths shut about what really happened on 9/11, or how they knew always the reason for the Iraq war was one big lie?

Lately I've noticed people, particularly convenience store clerks, are looking at me strangely.

Maybe I don't hide so well the worried look on my face.

People want to talk about politics, candidates? I see a one-party system in the United States dominated by nongentile bankers aligned with the forces of Europe's old money, which likely in and of itself is nongentile as well, since the major controlling mechanism of human society — the Rothschild controlled banks, whose emblem is the prototype of the flag of Israel — have dominated the world financial scene since long before they pilfered from American citizens the right to control their own money way back in 1913.

But today's news is worse.

Scheduled start of World War Three was due March 20, when they tried to start up the Iranian bourse (European term for "stock exchange") trading oil in euros in Tehran.

Doesn't it give you a warm feeling when you know the sclerotic, twitching finger of Dick Cheney is fiddling with the nuclear button? Here's a man who has never been stopped, and he can produce the spilled blood to prove it.

Who knows what the latest twist will be in this stranger-then-coincidence confrontation with Iran over another pack of lies? The U.S. picks wars with whomever it wants, and because its citizenry is so drugged-out by bad schools, medicine and food, they roar their drunken approval of these atrocities.

Trouble is, the last pack of lies, implemented with the devil's own fury in the country next door, didn't do Iraq a bit of good, and it looks for all the world that the U.S./Britain/Israel military machine aims to cut a swath of control from Beirut to Baluchistan, and woe to anyone who gets in the way. The southern shore of the Persian Gulf is already firmly locked up with Zionist-financed allies in Jewish-controlled Saudi Arabia, and the 'Stans' between Iran and Russia/China seem solidly fortified with U.S. airbases.

Standing exactly in the way of the new American parking lot now being paved over central Asia is the venerable Iran, modern redaction of the Persian empire, from the whom the Western powers of history took their organizational models.

Now perhaps the world's most vibrant democracy (about the only place remaining I have been able to speak freely on TV and radio now that I have been heavily censored in the U.S.), Iran is a young thriving nation with an honorable tradition, which Israel seeks to smash because it threatens Jewish totalitarian hegemony in the region, a condition Palestinians and Iraqis have long experienced firsthand.

Israel wants to turn the entire Middle East into an unhabitable though industrially feasible dead zone from which profits can be extracted without people — especially people they consider cattle — getting in the way.

Iran has been the only country on Earth to officially challenge the insidious Jewish mindlock on the Holocaust, that meme of memory from World War Two that has been turned into a mental inoculation to prevent discussion of Jewish media ownership, the centuries-old Zionist master plan, and current and continuing Israeli atrocities, which are daily concealed by the Jewish press.

Perhaps it's an important moment in history, as these modern Persians have opened a door to public consciousness of the Jewish attempt to eradicate freedom of speech once and for all throughout the world through rigid enforcement of the Holocaust religion and burying the true facts of Auschwitz with stories about soap and burning in lakes of fire.

Ironic, isn't it, that this is where Judaism started, in the ancient Mecca called Babylon, and now the surrounding countryside is about to be nuclearized, if not vaporized? Fitting tribute to a philosophical school, eh? The Old Testament rag, whose God won't ever really be happy until he sees that mushroom cloud.

This insane worship of a Holocaust that never happened was generated by a half century's worth of public indoctrination from news networks whose message is always polluted by a product purpose. Jewish ownership of American public media dates back to the 1890s with the formation of Hollywood. The U.S. financial system was permanently expropriated by private bankers in 1913, and we have been financial slaves ever since this permanent theft of control over our own money.

Yes, this is the topic of discussion that got all those U.S. presidents assassinated. And how Piper proved the Mossad hit JFK.

But Jewish control of the money supply is concealed in myriad different political labels — Communism is Judaism, is the big one that counts. Now it is masquerading as a capitalist predator society and hiding behind a misleading patina of labels and trivialities, reinforced by psychoactive drugs, telekinetic frequencies, scheduled sedatives and carcinogens in what we consume, and a media diet to keep you pinned to the electronic rodeo and swilling the beer of your choice.

How many Americans have gone down the rabbithole morally in recent years? Yes, America has always been a cesspool of rape and plunder largely covered over by those who write the history books. There may never have been a time in history when the populace got the straight scoop from the powers that be.

It seemed, though, in the last half of the 20th century in which I spent the better part of my life, that I grew up with a degree of confidence in a system that could produce people like Edward R. Murrow and Joe McCarthy, a world that could conduct a civilized debate and arrive at a logical solution.

Perhaps I was naive. Once upon a time, I loved my country. Now I am very afraid of it.

At the outset of the 21st century, I began to see major cracks in the veneer of American history as it was presented to me by a jowled Mr. Gula in high school history class in 1962.

America's founding fathers were brigands and crooks who never quite got themselves clear of the European money supply. We're turned our Colonial Days into amusement parks and covered up the acknowledgment that the business world runs on legalized criminality. This assault on American freedom has been largely engineered by Jewish bankers, who control publishers and educators.

That's exactly what has taken us to where we are today, with a world exploding in blood for profit. And why we are all in danger of losing our lives in the immediate days ahead.

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, whose new collection of Internet essays, "Recipe for Extinction," is available at  http://www.johnkaminski.com/

Recent videos putting this into perspective 21.Mar.2006 02:00


 link to video.google.com

Also see loose Change:
Your Ad Here get naked for 9/11 truth!
calling for non-violent civil disobedience Come say goodbye to Bush
Come say goodbye to George Bush! Wife of USMC Colonel talks!
Drunken hubbie spills the beans
See the Missile at the WTC~!
All one has to do is slow Down the Video! LOOSE CHANGE DVD at bulk rates
Clamshell case, factory pressing, as low as $3! 9/11 and AIDS Big Lies
Powerful Lies negatively shaping our World

Movies to make you think. All of these downloadable movies are free. Click the links to be taken to the download page.

These are highly compressed videos, so if you want to spread the word PLEASE purchase the original DVD versions and support these great filmmakers. These video downloads are shared in the spirit of learning. If you have a problem with us hosting a video which you have rights to, please let us know and we will remove it, however many documentary makers have seen increased sales due to this exposure.

License plate frames are seen up to 20 times a day. Click to get yours now!

911 Mysteries The first 9/11 movie designed specifically for the mainstream audience, a theatrical quality movie-length DVD with a full original soundtrack that will rivet you to your seat and blast out of your home theatre system. Coming soon for DVD purchase and download. 911 Mysteries Web Site

911 Mysteries_Trailer (WMV 6 megs)

Secret Evil A great quick Overview of the 911 Issues:

Secret Evil of 911 (WMV 12 megs)

911 Made In The USA featuring Loose Change

This is a compilation of 9/11 footage from around the world showing that many around the world are trying to get the message out, and the great lengths the guilty are going to to hide the truth. This DVD includes the full version of Loose Change First Edition by Dylan Avery, along with documentary samples from 911 Eyewitness, Japan, and a German documentary with an exclusive interview with the filmmaker telling how his documentary was suppressed the next day after it was aired. A must see! [Buy the DVD]

911 Made In The USA with Loose Change 1of4 (WMV 47megs)

911 Made In The USA with Loose Change 2of4 (WMV 47megs)

911 Made In The USA with Loose Change 3of4 (WMV 47megs)

911 Made In The USA with Loose Change 4of4 (WMV 47megs)

Loose Change Second Edition is not so much a sequel as a remake of the original with added footage. Also below is Loose Change coverage by Fox News' New York affiliate that was so popular it shut down their video server on the web. [Official Loose Change Web Site]

Loose Change 2E 1of3 (WMV 47megs)

Loose Change 2E 2of3 (WMV 47megs)

Loose Change 2E 3of3 (WMV 47megs)

Loose Change 2E - Coverage by Fox News
12/01/2005 (WMV 10megs)

Loose Change 2E - Coverage by Fox News
12/02/2005 (WMV 9megs)

911 Eyewitness is a detailed analysis of the sounds of the WTC collapse as heard by a witness on the New Jersey shoreline. This is a stunning video. [Buy the DVD]

911 Eyewitness 1of3 (WMV 48megs)

911 Eyewitness 2of3 (WMV 48megs)

911 Eyewitness 3of3 (WMV 48megs)

Professor Stephen Jones of Brigham Young University detailed how the collapses of the WTC were most likely caused by explosives. His astounding story was covered fairly by a local Utah TV station.

Professor Steven Jones on Utah TV News (WMV 7megs)

But on a Cable TV news show, he was treated like a criminal.

Professor Steven Jones Shows WTC Demolition Evidence (WMV 29megs)

And here is the footage of the collapse of WTC building 7 they would not show during the interview.

WTC7Collapse (WMV 1megs)

Steven Jones gave a complete talk about his evidence on a Utah school campus. This is his complete analysis of the evidence from his investigation of 9/11.

BYU Professor Steven Jones on 911 Explosives 02012006 1of4 (WMV 47megs)

BYU Professor Steven Jones on 911 Explosives 02012006 2of4 (WMV 47megs)

BYU Professor Steven Jones on 911 Explosives 02012006 3of4 (WMV 47megs)

BYU Professor Steven Jones on 911 Explosives 02012006 4of4 (WMV 47megs)

File 911 Unsolved Willy Brunner and Gerhard Wisnewski were filmmakers contracted by German public television to create this excellent documentary about the unanswered questions of 9/11. Fully approved by management, the day after airing the management said it was full of lies and fired the film makers. Presented in German with English subtitles. See the interview with the filmmaker in "911 Made In The USA"

File 911 Unsolved 1of2 (WMV 48megs)

File 911 Unsolved 2of2 (WMV 48megs)

Face The Facts 911TruthBristol.com presents an excellent compilation of clips from 9/11 documentaries.

Face The Facts (WMV 28megs)

The Great Conspiracy News Flash: This news special never appeared on the evening news detailing the oddities of the 9/11 attacks, but it raises some amazing questions that everyone should be asking.

The Great Conspiracy - The 9-11 News Special You Never Saw 1of3 (WMV 48megs)

The Great Conspiracy - The 9-11 News Special You Never Saw 2of3 (WMV 48megs)

The Great Conspiracy - The 9-11 News Special You Never Saw 3of3 (WMV 48megs)

Martial Law Alex Jones brings his bulldog style to the 911 issue in a big way. This video covers 911 issues with tons of references, as well as proof of the new police state that it has allowed to take hold. [Buy the DVD]

Alex Jones - Martial Law 911 1of5 (WMV 48megs)

Alex Jones - Martial Law 911 2of5 (WMV 48megs)

Alex Jones - Martial Law 911 3of5 (WMV 48megs)

Alex Jones - Martial Law 911 4of5 (WMV 48megs)

Alex Jones - Martial Law 911 5of5 (WMV 48megs)

Painful Deceptions An extremely detailed technical analysis of the 911 issues from a scientific viewpoint. [Buy the DVD]

Painful Deceptions DVD Part 1 (WMV 39megs)

Painful Deceptions DVD Part 2 (WMV 42megs)

Painful Deceptions DVD Part 3 (WMV 35megs)

Painful Deceptions Addendum - Technical Details (WMV 29megs)

Painful Deceptions Update - 911 Commission Report (WMV 25megs)

Painful Deceptions Update - Uranium Report (WMV 5megs)

Painful Deceptions Update - Demolition Evidence (WMV 19megs)

911 In Plane Site A groundbreaking documentary, especially for the newcomer, with great footage and unanswered questions. [Buy the DVD]

911 In Plane Site Directors Cut Part 1 Download (WMV 45megs)

911 In Plane Site Directors Cut Part 2 Download (WMV 47megs)

911 In Plane Site Update (WMV 8megs)

David Ray Griffin The first major nationwide TV speech on the 911 issues by the author of "The New Pearl Harbor" and "The 911 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions". [Buy these Books]

David Ray Griffin Speech on CSPAN2 April 30 2005 Part 1 (WMV 47megs)

David Ray Griffin Speech on CSPAN2 April 30 2005 Part 2 (WMV 47megs)

911 Report Card CSPAN feed of Congresswoman Cynthia McKinneys critical review of the 9/11 Commission Report, touches on many important problems in the 9/11 story but not the demolitions of the buildings.

Cynthia McKinney on CSPAN - 911 report card 1 of 4 (WMV 47megs)

Cynthia McKinney on CSPAN - 911 report card 2 of 4 (WMV 47megs)

Cynthia McKinney on CSPAN - 911 report card 3 of 4 (WMV 47megs)

Cynthia McKinney on CSPAN - 911 report card 4 of 4 (WMV 47megs)

Building the WTC Interesting 20 minute documentary about the construction of the World Trade Center. Notice how much care and attention was given to it's strength and ability to withstand damage.

Building the World Trade Center (WMV 47megs)

Alternate Downloads by Bittorrent

Thank you. We welcome your comments by e-mail or phone at 702-425-9112. Download problems? Please notify us!

Please don't link people direct to these files, please spread the word by referring people to Question911.com and not the files directly. We have a limited amount of bandwidth each day and must control access to these files to prevent our site from being shut down. Thanks for understanding!

Other Downloads

These video documentaries are not related directly to 9/11 but show a pattern that any thinking person should consider in relation to the power structure which allows crimes like 9/11 to happen and have the truth of them covered up so well. We do not agree with all of the following opinions.

Aerosol Crimes Look - up in the sky - If the information in this well researched documentary is true, we have a lot of things in this world that need to be fixed. Should give us all a lot to contemplate. [Buy the DVD]

Aerosol Crimes 1of3 (WMV 47megs)

Aerosol Crimes 2of3 (WMV 47megs)

Aerosol Crimes 3of3 (WMV 47megs)

Clouds of Death This dramatic brief film looks at the topic above with a bit more conclusion and dramatic effect.

Clouds of Death (WMV 45megs)

The Corporation My vote for the best documentary ever made, this film details the psychological profile of the Corporation, an entity which controls our world, health, information, entertainment, food and political systems. [Buy the DVD]

The Corporation 1of6 (WMV 47megs)

The Corporation 2of6 (WMV 47megs)

The Corporation 3of6 (WMV 47megs)

The Corporation 4of6 (WMV 47megs)

The Corporation 5of6 (WMV 47megs)

The Corporation 6of6 (WMV 47megs)

Walmart After viewing the general nature of The Corporation - watch this specific documentary detailing the efforts of Wal-Mart, the worlds largest retailer to avoid taxes, export jobs, break unions and exploit local health care systems designed for the poor.

Walmart - The High Cost of Low Price 1of4 (WMV 48megs)

Walmart - The High Cost of Low Price 2of4 (WMV 48megs)

Walmart - The High Cost of Low Price 3of4 (WMV 48megs)

Walmart - The High Cost of Low Price 4of4 (WMV 48megs)

Life and Debt After the Wal-Mart documentary shows you the USA side of the outsourcing equation, watch the other side of the coin. The struggles of the third world under increasing massive corporate control of all commerce is studied in this excellent film about the struggles in Jamaica.

Life and Debt 1of3 (WMV 48megs)

Life and Debt 2of3 (WMV 48megs)

Life and Debt 3of3 (WMV 48megs)

Hemp Revolution A ray of hope! This should make you feel better because the solutions for most of the worlds problems are within our reach, but are simply being suppressed by corporate interests, but we can have them if we want them enough. Industrial Hemp is not a drug, has no psychotropic effects, yet it is illegal to grow this natural plant in the USA. Want to know why? It's all here.

Hemp Revolution 1of3 (WMV 47megs)

Hemp Revolution 2of3 (WMV 47megs)

Hemp Revolution 3of3 (WMV 47megs)

Hoxsey Doctors and the American Medical Association - is their goal to cure you from illness - or are they more interested in maintaining you in sickness? This well documented film has historical footage showing how the AMA tried to close down a cancer clinic curing people daily. Who benefits? Clinic Web Site

How Healing Becomes A Crime 1of3 (WMV 48megs)

How Healing Becomes A Crime 2of3 (WMV 48megs)

How Healing Becomes A Crime 3of3 (WMV 48megs)

Oklahoma City Explosives expert USAF General Benton K. Parton makes his case that the Oklahoma City Federal Building was not demolished by a truck bomb. [Buy the DVD]

General Parton on Oklahoma City 1of2 (WMV 48megs)

General Parton on Oklahoma City 2of2 (WMV 48megs)

Kay Griggs Kay married Colonel George Griggs, a Marine Corps Chief of Staff, as well as head of NATO's Psychological Operations. He was also, his wife realized, entirely mind-controlled. Kay, a self-declared Christian, became privy to the real workings of the United States military, leadership training, drug-running and weapons sales, and the secret worldwide camps that train professional assassins. Kay Griggs' report of world events and the power elite paints a picture that begins to explain the hows and whys of our current global scenario. First 2 hours of the 8 hour interview. [Buy the DVD]

Kay Griggs Talks 1of5 (WMV 48megs)

Kay Griggs Talks 2of5 (WMV 48megs)

Kay Griggs Talks 3of5 (WMV 48megs)

Kay Griggs Talks 4of5 (WMV 48megs)

Kay Griggs Talks 5of5 (WMV 48megs)

Credit Cards Why let laws get in the way of corporate profits? This history of the credit card shows how large banks subverted laws against excessive interest rates and low monthly payments used to seduce us into the huge debt loads many of us fall into. Who benefits? [Buy the DVD]

Secret History of the Credit Card 1of2 (WMV 48megs)

Secret History of the Credit Card 2of2 (WMV 48megs)

Orwell Rolls Question: If 9/11 is such a big lie, how do they keep the media from talking about it? Well, do you know that 6 companies control virtually all of the media, and that they regularly refuse to run stories submitted by reporters? This is an amazing documentary.

Orwell Rolls in his Grave 1of4 (WMV 48megs)

Orwell Rolls in his Grave 2of4 (WMV 48megs)

Orwell Rolls in his Grave 3of4 (WMV 48megs)

Orwell Rolls in his Grave 4of4 (WMV 48megs)

Outfoxed This film concentrates specifically on Fox News and the spinning of lies to support a corporate agenda.

Outfoxed 1of2 (WMV 48megs)

Outfoxed 1of2 (WMV 48megs)

Sweet Misery The FDA would not approve a poison to put on grocery store shelves and in hundreds of products just because a few political favors were pulled in, would they?

Sweet Misery - A Poisoned World 1of3 (WMV 48megs)

Sweet Misery - A Poisoned World 2of3 (WMV 48megs)

Sweet Misery - A Poisoned World 3of3 (WMV 48megs)

Loose Change This Video clearly shows the physical evidence of 911 that is contradictory to the Official Version of 911.

Article Free Money