portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article announcements united states

9.11 investigation | imperialism & war

Experts Call for Release of 9/11 Evidence

(PRWEB) - Duluth, MN (PRWEB) March 1, 2006 -- A society of experts and scholars has now joined with Judicial Watch in calling for release of videos that are being held by theDepartment of Defense, which are essential to understanding events at the Pentagon that transpired on September 11, 2001. Scholars for 9/11 Truth, which is dedicated to exposing falsehoods and establishing truths about the events of 9/11, has gone beyond Judicial Watch by calling for the release of other films and evidence that, its officers maintain, are essential to understanding 9/11
(PRWEB) - Duluth, MN (PRWEB) March 1, 2006 -- A society of experts and scholars has now joined with Judicial Watch in calling for release of videos that are being held by the
Department of Defense, which are essential to understanding events at the
Pentagon that transpired on September 11, 2001. Scholars for 9/11 Truth, which is dedicated to exposing falsehoods and establishing truths about the events of 9/11, has gone beyond Judicial Watch by calling for the release of other films and evidence that, its officers maintain, are essential to understanding 9/11.

"It is outrageous that the government is withholding this vital information", said James H. Fetzer, founder and co-chair of the society. "This concerns one of the monstrous events of our time and deserves to be in the public domain." The group, whose members include such prominent figures as David Ray Griffin, Morgan Reynolds, John McMurtry, Wayne Madsen, Robert Bowman, Webster Tarpley, and Andreas von Buelow, has been speaking out against what its own research suggests has been complicity by elements of the administration in the crime.

They are calling for immediate release of the full Pentagon surveillance tape as well as video tapes seized by
FBI agents minutes after the Pentagon hit; a complete inventory of the plane wreckage and debris from Flights 11, 77, 93, 175 or any other aircraft that crashed or was destroyed on September 11, 2001, including, but not limited to their location (whether warehoused or otherwise), catalog of photographs and videotapes taken of any items from the planes, and results of all tests and examinations conducted concerning any of these items.

Judicial Watch has filed a lawsuit demanding that DoD release its film footage. In addition, the scholars call for the release of a complete inventory of any steel, other metal, or other materials from the World Trade Center, including, but not limited to the location (whether warehouses or otherwise) of all such items, catalog of photographs and videotapes of any items from the scene, and results of all tests and examinations conducted concerning any of those items.

Judy Wood, a professor of mechanical engineering at Clemson University and a full member of the society of scholars, has emphasized the importance of this material for those studying the collapse of the Twin Towers and World Trade Center 7. "This material has the potential to resolve crucial questions about the forces that were responsible for the buildings' fall, including the possible use of incendiaries and explosives", she observed. "It is of great importance that we have access to it."

They also call for release of 6,899 photographs and 6,977 segments of video footage held by NIST; tape recordings of interviews by air traffic controllers, at least some of which were deliberately destroyed while in the possession of representatives of the government; a complete accounting of "terror drills" that were being conducted that morning, which may have been used to mask the attack; the cockpit voice recorders and other "black boxes", three of four of which are reported to have survived the Twin Towers' collapse; and other related evidence.

According to Professor Fetzer, the SEC possesses knowledge of "put options" on American and United Airlines, which are suggestive of advanced knowledge that the attacks would take place; Secretary of Transportation
Norman Mineta gave very important testimony to The 9/11 Commission, which it chose not to include in its report; and the
Secret Service conducted itself in a manner suggesting that it knew there was no serious threat to the President, even following the attacks in New York, while the Commander-in-Chief ignored the unfolding drama.

"We are inclined to believe that these events were orchestrated by the Bush administration in order to instill fear in the American people," Fetzer said. "The use of violence and threats of violence to manipulate a populace based on fear," he observed, "is the definition of terrorism. The release of this vital evidence will help to confirm or to dispel our concerns about what happened on 9/11." Added Wood, "The American people are entitled to know the truth about their own history. If the government has nothing to hide, it should have no objections to releasing all this evidence for experts and scholars to study."

Fetzer also noted today's Zogby International Poll, which shows that 90% of American troops in
Iraq believe that they are fighting to avenge
Saddam Hussein's role in 9/11. "This would be funny if it weren't so sad", Fetzer said. "The administration falsely linked Iraq to 9/11 even though it knew better", he remarked. "Even the Osama Bin Laden 'confession tape' appears to have been faked. We want to know the identity of those who perpetrated these despicable acts."

Scholars for 9/11 Truth maintains its own public web site at  http://www.st911.org. Documentary support for its request is available at  http://www.st911.org/petition/.

PRESS CONTACT:

Alex Floum, Esquire
S9/11T Associate
(925) 818-1702 (cell)
email protected from spam bots

FOR THE SOCIETY:

James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
Founder and Co-Chair
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
(218) 726-7269 (office)
(218) 724-2706 (home)
(218) 726-7119 (fax)

news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/20060301/bs_prweb/prweb352979_1
good luck 02.Apr.2006 03:35

poosh

'a complete inventory of the plane wreckage and debris from Flights 11, 77, 93, 175 or any other aircraft that crashed or was destroyed on September 11, 2001, including, but not limited to their location (whether warehoused or otherwise), catalog of photographs and videotapes taken of any items from the planes, and results of all tests and examinations conducted concerning any of these items.'

yes, here is an inventory list of the wreckage that i copy-pasted onto offical government letterhead. now what?

lets demand more things too= things that they will claim to have been melted and recycled into pepsi coke cans and deleted files and falsified documents some more.

Screw the evidence that is being withheld.

-- how about a supoena for those in Shanksville who were there (the coroner)?

Polygraphs. Interviews. Poosh.

Go get Lisa Beamer whose husband is still alive- ask her why she lied... pull a connie chung on her.

Send me your hollywood money and i will hire mexicans at minimum wage plus bonus waiting outside u-haul and we will get to movin boy..

you cant explain arithamatic to a baby boomer or college kid good luck convincing them of the existance of physics in their illogical worlds...

discussion

Scholars for 9/11 plagiarism and disinformation 03.Mar.2006 05:31

Gerard Holmgren

In 2002, this would have been cutting edge stuff. Now its just gatekeeping.

Scolars for 9/11 plagiarism and disinformation

 http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/scholars.html

Gerard Holmgren 04.Mar.2006 00:55

gatekeeping

You are full of shit Gerard.

Beautifully argued ! 05.Mar.2006 12:41

Gerard Holmgren

The comment above is most assuredly an incisive point by point deconstruction of my work. You can find the "full of shit" at these links.

 http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/manufactured.html

 http://members.iinet.net,au/~holmgren/S11articles.html

 http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/~disinfo.html

 http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/~truth.html

 http://911closeup.com


I'm Unimpressed with Gerard 06.Mar.2006 02:14

spin laden productions (AP)

I actually agree with the unsubstantiated ad-hominem abuse directed at you, "Gerard."

Here is some other work by the alleged "Gerard Holmgren",
in which it is not kosher to mention those 5 Israeli Urban Moving Systems agents
who were arrested in an explosives-tainted moving van with
"maps linking them to the bombing plot", after being reported to the FBI
for their "unusual behavior" described as "joy and mockery".
[Bergen Record, NYT, Forward, abc 20/20, etc.]
 http://emperors-clothes.com/letters/holm.htm

Note how "Gerard Holmgren" seems to think that the "behavior of Bush on the morning" constitutes good evidence against the official narrative (and it does) -- but the behaviour of those five Israelis on the morning is a totally different and rather taboo kind of Pet Goat Story.

Later we discover "Gerard", my alleged compatriot from down-under, asserting, with religious fervour, that a 767 didn't hit the Nth Tower!
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/05/288505.shtml#123614

But "Gerard" first came to light as a self-appointed witness-testimony analyst (read character-assassin), so for good measure, here's what someone who was ACTUALLY AT THE PENTAGON had to say about the attack, so you can compare this testimony to any contrary bizzarre conclusions you may have had to suffer as a consequence of my alleged compatriot's dirty and sinister work on the topic:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Soon after the crash (Within 30 seconds of the crash) I witnessed a military cargo plane (Possibly a C-130) fly over the crash site and circle the mushroom cloud. My brother inlaw also witnessed the same plane following THE JET while he was on the HOV lanes in Springfield. He said that he saw A JETLINER flying low over the tree tops near Seminary RD in Springfield, VA. and soon afterwards a military plane was seen flying right behind it.
[...]

Isn't it odd how there is Not a single mention of this aircraft in ANY of the articles written about this crash? [incLuding those by "Gerard" the self-appointed witness report expert?]

[...]
VIDEO cameras all around ... WOULD HAVE given a great line of site SHOT of THAT JET prior to the crash AS WELL AS ANY OTHER PLANE which might have been following it.

[...]
I personally believe that the government new full well that this was about to happen and THEY ARE HIDING SOMETHING a lot bigger than they are willing to let out.
[...]
THEY ARE DEFINITELY HIDING SOMETHING
 link to web.archive.org
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Flying over the tree tops... 06.Mar.2006 14:26

Gerard Holmgren

Flying over the tree tops. And somehow - at 400 mph, it descended and levelled out in less than a second to be flying straight ahead, just a few inches off the ground - without the vortex pushing it back up or destablizing its flight path or scattering cars on Washinton Blvd, directly behind it. And then somehow arched its spine to clear 8 ft high cable spools standing on end in its path, and the vortex didn't knock them over either.

Moving right along...

My witness article dealt only with reports which gave at least the superficial appearance of someone sayuing that they actually saw it hit the building. That isn't neccesarily the whole story, but neither did it claim to be. It investigated that aspect of the puzzle. The paramters were set out quite clearly.

 http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/witness.html

If people are going to claim witneses to a large plane hitting the building, then the witnesses should say that they saw a large plane hit the building. If they don't, then its not a witness report of a large plane hitting a building. Its a witness report of a large plane being in the area at the time. The idea that it hit the building is deduction, which is a different thing.

There is a place for deduction, but it should not be dishonestly cloaked as
direct observation.

As was made quite clear in my article.

Heh ! And leon thinks that 767s hit the WTC towers. Because Leon can't tell little from big and cant tell blob from plane shape. (Nth tower)

 http://thewebfairy.com/911/missilegate/
 http://thewebfairy.com/911/flyingpig/
 http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/planevideos.html

And cant tell Cartoon from real plane (St tower)

 http://thewebfairy.com/911/
 http://911hoax.com/

And doesn;t realize that real planes leave wreckage and also have to follow the law of conservation of energy.

WTC forensics

 http://www.911closeup.com/index.shtml?ID=79

There isn't even room for a 767 to fit into the building. The nose would have hit the core when 95 ft of plane was still outside. Before the wings even got there.

So somehow the plane crumples itself up like an accordion on the core, but still glieds smoothly ahead, and the aluminium wings somehow miraculously stay attached to the fuselage which had turned into a zig zag of aluminium scrap - with enough strength to saw through steel constuction columns, as they enter , swept back at 30 degrees (please let me know where I can buy an aluminium cutting blade for steel - I'm sure its cheaper than cobalt or tungsten) and then as the fuselage continues to destroy itself against the core, with the plane still somehow gliding smoothly in without deccelerating, the tail which miraculsouly hasn't broken off yet, still has enough strength to ram its way through the wall too,

Moving right along...

Or maybe the plane just demolished the steel core ? Right, planes get holes put in them when they hit a flock of birds, but they easily demolish the main support core holding up one of the world's tallest buildings.

Then after having demolished the core, the plane somehow, puts on the brakes and parks itself inside the building with about 24 ft to spare either side, and even though the core has just been demolished, the building stays standing with no apparent sigs of damage.

Now, what's more possible ? All of this cartoon garbage, or that the media showing us a movie, sticking a "news" label on it, just like they did with the fake bin Laden video ?

Or maybe Leon believes that the Fake Bin Laden video is real too ?

Perhaps Leon thinks that the wrestling is real ? After all its on TV.
And if a plane wings can slice steel construction beams, even when the fuselage they are attached to effectively no loger exists, then why cant a guy get his head rammed into the steel stairs twenty times in a row and then suddenly jump up and throw the other guy out of the ring ? After all, its on TV it must be real...

We went to war over cartoons.

Gerard the Mossad Apologist for 911 06.Mar.2006 18:56

spin laden productions (AP)

Have a nice day, Gerard.

Keeep on spruking those lies, and bashing anyone who dares to mention the reported facts concerning Urban Moving Systems and Domink Suter.

Keep infering cgi and/or holograms at the WTC if this deliberate attempt of yours to smear and discredit 911 research pleases you.

OK?

Have a nice day.

"SUPPOSEDLY arrested"
- the alleged Gerard Holmgren for Israel, who, unlike Allen Clevelandm, was not at the Pentagon on 911

Quod Erat Demonstrandum

P.S.: Gerard's Infinite Misrepresentation Loop 06.Mar.2006 19:45

spin laden productions (AP)

-------------------------------------------
Flying over the tree tops. [witness reports] And somehow - at 400 mph [Gerard], it descended and levelled out in less than a second [Gerard] to be flying straight ahead, just a few inches off the ground [Gerard]
-------------------------------------------

The alleged Gerard, unlike everyone else with the exception of the FBI, has secret video of the actual flight of the AA Jet, showing it flying just inches above the Pentagon lawn prior to impact -- contrary to what most people who were actually present reported!

Show us your SECRET VIDEO that shows this, <A HREF=" link to emperors-clothes.com

EVERYONE WANTS TO SEE IT!

IT WILL BE GROUNDBREAKING! DON'T KEEP IT PRIVATE! <A HREF=" http://emperors-clothes.com/letters/holm.htm">PUBLIC-IZE IT</A>!
[Gosh! I hope you are not conflating Pentagon witness reports with the infamous sequence of meaningless 912 date-stamped pixels released by the Pentagon via CNN in March of 2002! You wouldn't do that now - would you?]

Leon's reality TV 06.Mar.2006 19:47

Gerard Holmgren

Hey Leon,

What time of the year is best to visit Jurassic Park ? I mean, we saw that on TV too. I must be real too. (Snigger)

See Leon's incisive explanation above for how a 160 ft plane can glide smoothly into the 65 space before the core. And then have the wings slice their way through steel columns even though the fuselage they were connected to has aleready started smashing itself up on the core, about 15 ft before the wing roots even reach the building. (Snigger)

I think a cartoon of a bad man with a turban must have frightened Leon when he was little.

We went to war over cartoons.
 http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/noplanework.html

Gerard Holmgren is a Cartoon Clown 07.Mar.2006 02:17

spin laden productions (AP)

Hey Gerard!

Like many millions of people on earth, I saw dozens of videos of a 767 slamming into the South tower, many of them broadcast live and recorded by me on 911 (others sourced from the internet). Unlike most, if any, 911 researchers, I also noticed that part of the fuselage emerges from the South tower on the side opposite to impact, and subsequently explodes, while being engulfed in flames from the previous explosion of fuel. (see img sequence, and cross-check this with archive videos).

What time of day is best to misrepresent your opponents and conflate their theories with fantastic strawmen?

What time of day is it best to pretend that those who were present when Boeings flew through the sky and slammed into the towers on 911 were actually in a cinema somewhere instead -- not on the streets -- being dazzled by a hollywood movie, a hologram, a wrestling match, or a cartoon?

What did Charles Spiesel say on court, Gerard, and more importantly, why?
explosive fuselage
explosive fuselage

The cartoons can be seen here 07.Mar.2006 03:09

Gerard Holmgren

The cartoons which Leon thinks are real (snigger) can be seen here.

 http://thewebfairy.com/911
 http://911hoax.com

I'll let Leon have the last word, because that's very,very important to him, and makes him feel like presented something of substance.

exposing Gerard the Cartoon Clown for Mossad 07.Mar.2006 18:56

spin laden productions (AP)

I'll let Gerard "I LOVE ISRAEL AND MOSSAD" Holmgren - my alleged compatriot who wasn't in New York or Washington on 911 - the Charles Spiesel of the 911 movement - have the last word.

But don't forget - here is where you can see Gerard pretending that Urban Moving Systems is a cartoon, while anyone who dares to mention any of the documented details is engaged in "circumstantial, vague and twisting speculation" !!!!

 http://emperors-clothes.com/letters/holm.htm
 http://emperors-clothes.com/letters/holm.htm
 http://emperors-clothes.com/letters/holm.htm

in case you missed Gerard being a cartoon - here it is again:
 http://emperors-clothes.com/letters/holm.htm
 http://emperors-clothes.com/letters/holm.htm
 http://emperors-clothes.com/letters/holm.htm
 http://emperors-clothes.com/letters/holm.htm