portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary united states

9.11 investigation

Facing the truth: Dick Cheney planned and executed the 9/11 attacks

I will name Richard Cheney as the prime suspect in the mass murders of 9/11 and will establish that, not only was he a planner in the attacks, but also that on the day of the attacks he was running a completely separate Command, Control and Communications system
Facing the Truth: Dick Cheney planned and executed the 9/11 attacksAuthor
seek the truth
Date Created
12 Feb 2006
More details...
Date Edited
12 Feb 2006 08:33:21 PM
Rating
Current rating: 0
License
This work is in the public domain
I will name Richard Cheney as the prime suspect in the mass murders of 9/11 and will establish that, not only was he a planner in the attacks, but also that on the day of the attacks he was running a completely separate Command, Control and Communications system


Mike Ruppert Names Cheney Prime Suspect in 9/11 (continued)
by SF INDYMEDIA

It would be difficult to exaggerate the importance of this information.

Announcing the release of Michael C. Ruppert's new book

CROSSING THE RUBICON: The Decline of the American Empire at the Endof the Age of Oil"

By Michael C. Ruppert
foreword by Catherine Austin Fitts
(New Society Publishers)

Crossing the Rubicon: the Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil by Michael C. Ruppert is a detective story that gets to the innermost core of the 9/11 attacks. It places 9/11 at the center of a desperate new America, created by specific, named individuals in preparation for Peak Oil: an economic crisis like nothing the world has ever seen.

The attacks of September 11th, 2001 were accomplished through an amazing orchestration of logistics and personnel. Crossing the Rubicon discovers and identifies the key suspects and persons of interest -- finding some of them in the highest echelons of American government -- by showing how they acted in concert to guarantee that the attacks occurred and produced the desired result.

In describing the contents of the book he has spent two and a half years researching and writing Ruppert said:

"In my new book I will be making several key points:

1. I will name Richard Cheney as the prime suspect in the mass murders of 9/11 and will establish that, not only was he a planner in the attacks, but also that on the day of the attacks he was running a completely separate Command, Control and Communications system which was superceding any orders being issued by the NMCC [National Military Command Center], or the White House Situation Room.

2. I will establish conclusively that in May of 2001, by presidential order, Richard Cheney was put in direct command and control of all wargame and field exercise training and scheduling through several agencies, especially FEMA. This also extended to all of the conflicting and overlapping NORAD drills on that day.

3. I will also demonstrate that the TRIPOD II exercise being set up on Sept. 10th in Manhattan was directly connected to Cheney's role.

4. I will also prove conclusively that a number of public officials, at the national and New York City levels, including then Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, were aware that Flight 175 was en route to lower Manhattan for 20 minutes and did nothing to order the evacuation of or warn the occupants of the South Tower. One military officer was forced to leave his post in the middle of the attacks and place a private call to his brother -- who worked at the WTC -- warning him to get out. That was because no other part of the system was taking action.

5. I will also show that the Israeli and British governments acted as partners with the highest levels of the American government to help in the preparation and, very possibly, the actual execution of the attacks."

"There is more reason to be afraid of not facing the evidence in this book than of facing what is in it."
this is old news 12.Feb.2006 21:22

by a couple of years

Crossing the Rubicon was published a couple of years ago. A quick Internet search (use Google if you trust 'em) should bring up tons of links to material by and about Michael Ruppert.

Not to hurt anyone's feelings, but this is old news.

old news lol 13.Feb.2006 00:31

truthout

Well, sometimes "old news" needs to be brought up again and again and again until the most ardently steadfast in denying probable truth are forced to face an issue.

It may be "old news" to you, but this movement is finally getting somewhere so I'd advise you to get used to it and stop whining. Besides, the issue here isn't Mike Ruppert, but the message that 9/11 was orchestrated by our own government against its own people.

No the issue is Michael Ruppert 13.Feb.2006 11:01

not a believer

Ruppert has this habit of propping up half-baked theory, circumstantial evidence, coincidences, and rhetoric to portray a conspiracy of monstrous proportions. Do some things about 9/11's conventional explanation fail to add up? Certainly. But that doesn't mean Bush and Cheney cooked the whole thing up. Seriously - they could have found plenty of other ways to justify an invasion of Iraq without killing 3,000 people.

Oh no he didn't! 13.Feb.2006 12:10

Universal Brotherly Lover

So wrong! The government responded to an event that may or may not have happened. It did happen, as expected/hoped-for. The government put in place the plans. In so doing, the mystery outsiders killed themselves, neutralizing themselves and leaving up to us to believe the government lies. Some of Ruppert's work is very good, however the hypothesis of inside job is incorrect. It is neither the cartoon al-qaeda or inside job - there were other players on the world stage, pre-catastrophe!

whisper 13.Feb.2006 12:44

salamander

I don't know if it was Cheney or who in the US government, but it was certainly the US government or elements therein. They are the only ones with the power and resources to demolish the 3 WTC buildings, divert FBI inquiry, send the anthrax to democrats and media to make them scared to say anything, make the military stand down that day, promptly ship off all the steel from the buildings without chance for analysis and so on.

And to the person who said "Seriously - they could have found plenty of other ways to justify an invasion of Iraq without killing 3,000 people." Please open your eyes a little more. All the evidence points to them doing it. They talked about needing such an attack beforehand, and it has played right into their subsequent plans. When a crime is committed, look at who benefits and you are most likely looking at the culprits.

This adminstration has continued to enact legislation that is ruining the economy, reducing jobs, cutting social services and healthcare. They are stealing from the poor to give to the rich. These policies will kill far more than 3000 people. They are talking about a first strike nuclear war against Iran. The latest estimates for Iraqi civilian deaths is averaging about 200,000. How can you possibly think they give a crap about 3000 people? Thinking so is nothing but denial.

questions for not a believer 13.Feb.2006 15:10

support your claims

What half-baked theory has Ruppert propped up? Coincidences? To believe in the "official story" propagated by the US Gov't, one would have to believe far more coincidences. What explanation have you for the myriad ways the Administration has sought to hide evidence, to block access to investigations, to set up an investigative team of basically their friends and supporters? The Official Story is preposterous, and the only way a lot of actions before, during, and since 9/11 make sense is in the context of involvement by Cheney and company.

Here are all the things you'd have to believe are coincidences to buy the Official Story on 9/11:
 link to 911fraud.blogspot.com

Don't Believe "Not a Believer" 13.Feb.2006 17:37

.

Not a Believer's post sounds to me like exactly what someone would write who just wants to discredit a story with no actual reasoning behind the doubts.
It makes me remember that there are people out there - paid and unpaid - whose job it is to surf sites like this and naysay hot topics such as this one.
Instead of presenting any clear evidence contrary to the FACTS of the case, they deflect attention to the person presenting the facts and dismiss the findings as ridiculous.
On the other hand, N.A.B. is representational of most of America who, understandably, is in deep denial that our own gov't could ever do something as base and destructive as what it appears they have done.
But no amount of ignorance and no amount of illigitimate commentary will stop the tide of truth from rising and spilling over the levee of lies they've surrounded themselves with. The more physicists and specialists study what really happened 911 and the commission report that followed, the more who will agree that we've been duped like a herd of buffalo over a cliff.

Do the math...work the problem from a basic low end IQ 09.May.2006 22:46

Amazed and disgusted

It's so obvious given the dialoque and visual of the WTC #6 coming down that this is controlled demo. If #6 was/is controlled demolition, then it is no leap to know, to know deep down inside, viscerally, that the N & S towners were controlled demo. It's as plain as the video and science in front of our, the worlds face. There is no other scientific, as explained totally via the laws of nature, way of dropping these buildings into their footprints..... How frick'n stupid do they think we are....? How can so many people be so quiet?