portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts global

political theory

LET IT BE KNOWN - Propagandized stupider than the fates will allow

Let it be known, that the senior management national news
reducers of CBC and CNN, know full well, they would rather
watch American Soldiers die as the thieving bad guys, than to
defend God's America by reporting that the demon enemy George
W. Bush, and his business partner General Ahmad, committed
the terrorist acts of 9/11, along with Rumsfeld, Rice, Cheney,
and Myers.
Propagandized stupider than the fates will allow

Let it be known, that the senior management national news
reducers of CBC and CNN, know full well, they would rather
watch American Soldiers die as the thieving bad guys, than to
defend God's America by reporting that the demon enemy George
W. Bush, and his business partner General Ahmad, committed
the terrorist acts of 9/11, along with Rumsfeld, Rice, Cheney,
and Myers.

We shall, start there, and continue on until we've nabbed
every last treasonous culprit found at the ends of the ample
crimes scene leads. Propagandized stupider than the fates
will allow, an American is universally recognizing itself as
an enemy to their own cowardly dying selves. For, my friend,
America's America will not stand undefended with these beliefs
of mine I give freely. Soldiers along with honorable Police
officers I would ask, to bravely/politely demand our time
on national broadcasts for the spoken defense of Justice for
America. For, Johnny wants to debate the bushite publicly on
the validity of the Iraq war, considering that it has no true
justifiable cause. Meaning: all stolen revenues will be
returned to the Iraqi people, with interest, paid for by those
responsible for stealing it. Justice Johnny has now
officially arrived on the scene to hunt bushite down to the
ends of life - to teach'em with kind words, or the other way
with graver sentences handed down by us believers in freedom
from tyranny. Hint: Don't ---- with the real Children of God
who are refusing to take more chances with enemy bushite
neo-con bullshit. An innocent person shall not be imprisoned
in my name, nor shall they be tortured, robbed, or murdered.
Bushite enemies that don't like that arrangement, we arrest,
try, and if convicted on the war crime capital offenses of
first degree mass murder, such as we will find regarding
Mattis, Blount, Russell, and Sattler, Allawi and Doud, then,
and only then, we together will joyously have them publicly
executed for the good of the entire body politic. In the
name of Jesus, Allah has spoken for life in which all are
granted equal privilege to love with everything we are
together alone with the stars. Death to the ungodly bushite,
instead of the innocent they target for plunder with
treasonous lies as a betrayal to our real names.

God, Johnny, You, and the Great America.

 link to istanbul.indymedia.org



Realize, CNN and CBC have received this post, yet, continue to
lie to dying soldiers for the unholy benefit of the enemy

 link to sydney.indymedia.org

The "Shock and Awe" Gallery©

/ / "The children seem to be the most openly enthused.
They are getting a chance at a future the likes of which
would never have been possible under the oppressive
regime..." \ \



When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.

= Highwater =


The Verdict

The Winnipeg Police Department is running a fencing operation
out of their "Exploitation" Unit. Disclosed by a current
serving officer in the Unit during the preliminary. In one
case used as an example, a law abiding Winnipeg business owner
had 50,000 dollars worth of business equipment stolen, and if
he wanted it back, he would have to make costly "legal"
efforts through a corrupted Justice system in Winnipeg that
holds Canadian Soldiers in complete contempt by "Law". The
Crown has not only refusing to co-operate with defending
Winnipeg citizenry, in relationship to the, National problem
of fencing through bad lawed Police action operations, and the
lotteries [information forwarded in part by the elected
Premier of our Province], but also, in respect to our
sacrificing soldiers. Soldiers who Canada now knows without
shadow of doubt, are being maliciously propagandized through
the corporate mouth pieces of the most heinous war criminal of
history, the ungodly enemy of Creation responsible for
instituting the terrorist crimes of 9/11. Obstructing Justice
by aiding and abetting the terrorist crimes of first degree
mass murder in New York City is suppose to be a serious
offence in Canada. So, as treasonous to Canadian Liberty, the
Crown in my case is refusing to have the police chief, or
other Crowns look into this matter. [I suggested by my Court
motion to our Court system to consider contacting another
office from a different province perhaps.] While the Judge,
publicly for the Winnipeg record, agreed to side with the
Crown instead, without stating the whys - that Justice for
Canada would not be served under his rule on my suggestion.
Just put a soldier in prison if they should dare stand up in
defense with their lives for Canada is what this unjust case,
yet to be reported on by our national press, is turning out to
be actually. I would ask you once again, to please make some
effort to get on local Winnipeg Radio, or Coast to Coast to
plead for some defense on this matter of morality. You know,
this Freedom thing does involve you too. So, George Norrie
and the rest of you lot, listen, I think you've made some
horrible judgment calls, and I'm asking you now, to live up
to your responsibilities to my America, and invite me on for
free discussions on these matters.

All I want is to challenge the man.


P.S. Maybe Harper won't be so bad... Doh!


A Soldier's Life Held in Contempt

The way I see it, is that I am completely documented correct
on who was responsible for the terrorist crimes of 9/11. I
have my own theories on why our media and police services have
failed our Soldiers by refusing to support my cause directly
thus far, but I am far without hope.

I believe the failures of me gaining direct wide support
through our police services and the Court of Queen's Bench, is
much more so for fear of uncertainty, and lack of leadership,
than a general, across the board support of furthering Bush's
war crime sprees by going still silent while Canadian soldiers
are left forsaken. I speak out publicly often regarding the
911 evidence in America, and email campaigns of my writings,
done for public recognition, I'm told, continue to swell to
near epic proportions. Intelligence officers the world over
most certainly know of my position on this matter. Those who
may support the fight for Bush rule in our police services,
can mostly only do so, risking in dishonorable blind personal
fear of the great unknown I figure. And, crazy as this may
sound, I believe there is a spooky cool God, for I'm walking a
groove most all of the time.

The affidavit that starts "1. National Security Issues" was
submitted in conjunction with my motion to request assistance
from the Court. The additional paper "Stand Together or
Don't", was an added part of the same affidavit.

The affidavit with 38 positions was submitted with the two
motions, "Order of Production" and "for the Crown to Stay
Proceedings". Duplicate copies of the same affidavit were
submitted in each respect.



"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted
Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.
11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban."

This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through
prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the
Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to
persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only
needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence
to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a
result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not
follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab
to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret


/ / In another characteristic incident, Bush asserted, as he
has repeatedly, that any decision on withdrawal of American
troops from Iraq "will be made by military commanders, not by
politicians in Washington DC." Congressional Republicans gave
a standing ovation to this remark, which amounts to a
declaration that, in the war for "freedom" and "democracy" in
Iraq, there is no room for such trifles as control over the
military by the civilian authorities, and subordination of
decisions on war and peace to the democratic will of the
American people. \ \

Exactly. The demon enemy of life itself, Our Mr. bush Jnr.,
who publicly parades his contempt for freedom and God, must
be stopped for all costs, that include for sure, your own
as reader.


Realize, CNN and CBC have received this post, yet, continue to
lie to dying soldiers for the benefit of the enemy neo-con.



These are the motions than were filed on behalf of Johnny
Wizard's defense in Winnipeg. A man arrested for threatening the
continuing existence of the lawless demon anti-Christ, Our Mr.
bush Jnr. The demon nazi who murdered thousands in New York
City as God's enemy. I, beg and plead my case to ALL that
will listen. The tyrannies of suffering on our God happen
when good people go silent in the face of evil. Please do not
forsake all that is good within yourself, by leaving my call
unheard from.


/ / Color me naive, but when I hear talk of cages, detention
and/or concentration camps, my mind usually wonders in devious
directions. I haven't seen anywhere in history where detention
centers and so forth were used as freedom enhancing tools.
View this anyway you wish, but do so at your own peril. \ \




I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba


Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire
transfer about $100,000 to hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns
after the transfer is disclosed in India and confirmed by the
FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street
Journal, 10/10/01, AFP, 10/10/01] The individual who makes the
wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is Saeed Sheikh, later
convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel Pearl
in February 2002. ABC News later reports, "federal
authorities have told ABC News they've now tracked more than
$100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to
accounts held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta."
[ABC News, 9/30/01] CNN also reports the $100,000 transfer,
and the New York Times specifies that it came in 2000. [CNN,
10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order
must have preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and
others started opening bank accounts and receiving the money
($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between June
19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]


On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he
had received anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy
documents dated September 9th, 2001, originating from
Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade
Afghanistan premised on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but
providing no evidence to back up the allegations, thereby
guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads
innocence to a crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime
serious enough to "justify" sacrificing American GIs truly for
a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron.
["The Dahbol Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any
offense would have been sufficient to have Muslim
fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had
offered [as others of other nations had also] repeatedly
during the Clinton years.

CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do
any follow up on the intelligence, deciding instead on behalf
of dying people everywhere, our public devolvement of a just


RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls
21 September 2001 17:41

The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's
ruling Taliban for proof that Osama bin Laden was responsible
for last week's attacks. According to the US Secretary of
State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to
try bin Laden in an American court.

The US Government said there would be no negotiations.


[This following document was the official damning account]

Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States
4 October 2001

[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]

"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case
against Usama Bin Laden in a court of law."

The document doesn't hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?


Investigating the Investigation

After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked
Daschle, "Did the vice president call you and urge you not to
investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle flatly
contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then
on Jan. 28 the president himself at one of our breakfast
meetings repeated the request."

...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24
and by Mr. Bush four days later, but "on other dates
following" as well.


ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations

Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop
investigations into a suspected terror cell linked to Osama
bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept. 11 attacks...

`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'


October 9 2001 - The Times of India

"While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed
that former ISI [the "Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen
Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being superseded on
Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed
here on Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the
"evidence" India produced to show his links to one of the
suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. The U.S.
authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that
$100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker Mohammed Atta from
Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed] at the instance of
General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have
confirmed that India contributed significantly to establishing
the link between the money transfer and the role played by the
dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, they
said that Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone
number, helped the FBI in tracing and establishing the link."


No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none.
[So according to Bush's official top secret Presidential
directives] While Laden himself claimed he played no part in
911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink
of starvation, Laden agreed to hand himself over, but Bush
refused the offer, while CBC and CNN denied to report on that
fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American GIs.
Once the indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every
building in the country of Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he
had no choice but to fight back to defend US innocent from the
ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the clear to all
fake video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close
to looking remotely like Laden, but for almost the facial
hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is HALF as long in
proportion to Laden's for example, and surely frightfully
shocking for some, the actor doesn't even take blame for 911
either!] Photos comparing the two faces never aired on CBC and
CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the


former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill

"the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were
U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi


Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von Buelow

"Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to
stop Al-Qaeda. They threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert
Wright if he tells us what he knows."


Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of
complete innocence with "We don't need any evidence, we know
he's guilty."



" [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that
the Sept. 11 hijackers were in the country and plotting to
use airplanes as missiles. She said documents also included
information relating to their financial activities. "


The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can
not be understated as the Bush Administration's primary motive
on criminal invasion of Afghanistan to save his biggest
corporate backers, the American pension thieving Enron.

From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz

" I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney
Energy Task Force meeting and what discussions there were as
to the steps that would be taken to remove the Taliban and
Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the
United States controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I
met that company in 1999 and have known since then about the
Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract lawsuit
in US District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know
about the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision on September
9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million arbitration
settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari
at the United States Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft
v Bridas."


From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New
York), 25 May 2002:

"We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army
Private Matt] Guckenheimer, an assistant gunner with the 10th
Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was anybody there,
they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there
were women and children to kill them."


Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing of
Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting"

by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.
Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall
Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hampshire

When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming
village of Chowkar- Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on
October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 civilians, a Pentagon
official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted
them dead." The reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1
When asked about the Chowkar incident, Rumsfeld replied, "I
cannot deal with that particular village."



"American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi
civilians - some of whom are entirely innocent.

And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line
coming out from the Pentagon's spin doctors Specialist
Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was no dilemma when
it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just
pulled the trigger."

The Crown would argue this issue isn't in her jurisdiction,
however, it is in mine as a expressive communicator fighting
for freedom from real tyranny. An irrational tyranny that
only stands exercised by corporate "news bite" censorship, and
false imprisonments. An American Prosecutor put Sergeant
Benderman in prison for refusing to kill God's children. Now,
what do you really think America would do, if "they" knew that


Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally responsible for




"Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said
they had no weapons, but that with shots coming in the men
were legitimate targets because they ran."



CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph
circulating the Internet of two Iraqi boys and a U.S.
soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys who
are giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign
written in English that reads, "Lcpl Boudreaux killed my Dad,
th[en] he knocked up my sister!"

(Link to photo:  http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg)


Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was frustrated"
[this story was on Bush's top secret W199i directive]

This information would take a well paid intelligence officer,
or CBC reporter no more that thirty seconds to look for follow
ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a national news report on


INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with radiation?

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.

INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.

"Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the
water in a river. It poisons the grasses and the grains. It
sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it
gets into the body, it does incredible damage. The
combination of radioactivity and heavy metal toxicity is such
that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get genetic

[thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy
metals, oxidized to microscopic particles as small as a tenth
of a micron have been deposited in our airspace, however, CBC
and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the scientifically
measurable extremely serious health concern issue..]


Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his
plenary power to use military force," Yoo insisted, "the
President's decisions are for him alone and are unreviewable."
Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report
regarding the torturing of innocent people to death, to state
something like "President Bush doesn't have to justify his
opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that


The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president Bush personally
signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order."
(See original at  http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf)


U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'

"Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of
war crimes and that forcing Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq
would have made him a war criminal.

He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant
Jimmy Massey, who is expected to testify that he and other
soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed Iraqis, including women and
a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military checkpoint."



that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating
detainees, ordering Defense Intelligence Agency debriefers out
of the room during questioning, confiscating evidence of the
abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained."



A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for
allegedly retaliating against him for refusing to falsify his
reports on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to support the
White House's pre-war position.


``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the
infantry does, kill people, and I had no justification for
doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war. Any act
of violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''


Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed
out. "Light him up!" the sergeant ordered, according to
testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing the unarmed man.
Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over
which of them had scored Company C's first kill.


It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County,
Ohio, precinct that tallied 4,258 votes for Bush when only 638
people had actually voted.



Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old
Palestinian [JEWISH] school girl is about to die

"It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a
girl of about 10. She's behind the embankment, scared to

"Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a
three-year-old, needs to be killed."


US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60
artillery rounds on Monday, said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers.
[...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan district said one building
in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on
the neighborhood overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs
were dropped in the city's northwest.

[destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a
kilometer, and all TRUE accounts of death rates for Fallujah
alone, a city where the population was forbidden to leave,
exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.]


The Bush Administration
In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words
Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST

By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle

"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted
Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.
11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban.
The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had
requested a CIA briefing in the summer of 2001 because of
elevated terrorist threats. And Rice's assertion this week
that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to
the side" appeared to be contradicted by an order signed by
Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon to begin planning
military options for an invasion of Iraq."

[ And...]


"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted
Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.
11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban."

This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through
prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the
Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to
persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only
needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence
to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a
result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not
follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab
to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret


Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated,
that Iraq had failed to comply with the newest U.N.
resolution: 1441.

HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform
professional no-notice inspections all over Iraq and to
increase aerial surveillance..."

With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the
Bush Administration pleased without delay, left a situation of
an unjust war only detrimental to an ability to bring about
any good or better thing. American soldiers are being
sacrificed for no better good or reason understood, for if
progress will ever be made, it will be when they work to bring
about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the
Bush Administration starting murdering innocent people for
nothing . Well, not completely, for Bremer shipped 19 billion
to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent


Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went
public several weeks ago after releasing a 19 page academic
paper, essentially showing how the laws of physics do not
support the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official
government story. It should be known that World Trade Center
Building Seven was not struck by an airplane, yet fell exactly
the same as the two towers.

Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only
creatable with the heating by high explosives.

Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani"

The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's
Law of Falling Bodies, and also Isaac Newton's First Law of

..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum
temperature of 1517 degrees Fahrenheit, how could they
possibly have melted this steel, when the melting point of
steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it
becomes a molten liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.

The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed by:

- Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc
- Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction
- and the American Free Press newspaper


"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got
the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on
Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11..."

Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee


The Washington Post, 23 September 2001.

At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar,
Afghanistan. There he delivered the bluntest of demands.
Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told Taliban leader
Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and
its allies.

Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban
were reported as a "failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite
Osama without providing a shred of eidence was part of
Washington's documented design, providing a pretext for a
military intervention which was already in the pipeline. If
Osama had been extradited, the main justification for waging a
war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold.
Nor would the ready to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when
MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse regarding the top secret
invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan
had been "fully implemented"


"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it
is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it
is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it
is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or
a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people
can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is
easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being
attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism
and exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering, Nazi
leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II


On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall
not be a victim, thou shall not be a perpetrator, and thou
shall not be a by-stander"


When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.

=Helen & Harry Highwater=



Please, I beg you to assist me in this cause immediately!

Ack! It turns out that there IS a criminal conspiracy run out of the
Winnipeg Police Department's Exploitation Unit!

Ack!! It turns out that the Crown IS aiding and abetting the
terrorist crimes of first degree mass murder!!

Ack!!! It turns out the Judge threw this whole Revelation thing out
without any consideration offered, while the Crown is currently
working on a public ban of disclosure in Winnipeg on these
continuing documented crimes!!!

50,000!! a pop! Stolen from law abiding business owners!!!

Crimes forwarded to the public in part by the concern of Manitoba's Premier!!!!!


Send this post for me to also Winnipeg media persons or to anyone who
will listen. If you don't, then, you ain't my friend. Come on! Do
something for us, and I promise to help you out later if I can.
Help me through the goodness of your heart, so we won't get
railroaded into prison fraudulently by those that hide in darkness
as pirates of our human will. The will to be free.

The Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my expressions!!


The Judge through this whole thing out for the defense
without any consideration offered to OUR COURT!



Since I am representing myself on these particular criminal
matters, Legal Aid is not required to lend assistance on the
grounds that I'm not co-operating with the system as it
operates through professional Barred representations. [I am
eligible for walk in consultations but nothing of the sort of
assistance I am requesting] Considering the complexity of my
judicial matter, I would request legal assistance from the
Court in these following areas.

1. National Security Issues

I need assistance in understanding the legal statutes that our
national security services are obligated to practice under, to
insure our national security matters are being truly defended
in my respect. No change in summation of my character was
altered, after they were granted a search warrant to verify it
was me who publicly spoke out for honorable FBI officers
denied their rights to speak freely, then as the Court knows,
instead of doing what they argued to grant such privilege to
infringe on my personal liberty, enforced a less than perfect
law that most others would buckle under, even if they harbored
no criminal intent, and would never do anything to infringe on
the rights of any child. For I challenge; it does not serve
Canada's interest (in particular our teen soldiers) to
knowingly have Canada propagandized under the serious failures
of CBC and the National Security Services to lend no wanting
cry to hear REAL FBI officers who factually allege, with
evidence and everything, President Bush's business partner,
(who was at the Whitehouse Sept. 9th working on the top
secret invasion of Afghanistan strategy to heavily arm heroin
pushers who war to keep women as slaves while weaponizing
children - done all for a liquefied gas pipe line to profit
his darling dear Enron) funded 9/11's "mastermind"
"ringleader" Mohammad Atta. Inside sources from the RCMP have
notified me, that in the last four years, Section D's salaried
employees, have done practically nothing to serve Canada's
interest in this respect. While Canada's CSIS does not have
the legal ability to speak out publicly regarding the criminal
transgressions of President Bush, and because of this nature
of CSIS's position, they have almost only fears to live with
by trying. A CSIS officer told me, many were completely aware
of President Bush's criminality regarding his hugely
treasonous actions of mass murder on 9/11, but could do
practically nothing about it outside of filing the reports
with the federal government, or maybe anonymously sending
something to CBC, with no promises that anyone would actually
read it. All the while, the senior CSIS boss brags
contemptuously in public about his ties and commitment to his
friends in the ISI. Perceived easily/mistakenly I'd imagine
as a threat to all of Canada's Honorable police officers and
Judges. [General Ahmad was the Bush junta's appointed head of
the ISI.] I think Canada's Prime Minister Paul Martin is
genuinely a good man, but it is hard to see him publicly take
a stand on this issue, [if he even received said reports] on
behalf of honorable police officers and soldiers everywhere,
in defense of the human race, risking everything, considering
he already does bring about a great deal of good for Canadians
where he stands. [Compared to you know, a let's send the kids
to war for whatever Harper, or nobody in Winnipeg
("officially" 86%) wants us to give away the public assets so
let's do it anyway for ourselves privately Filmon] But to know
the RCMP's Section D, sides that they can't tell us the top
secret reason they have not perused Justice for the sake of
Canadian soldiers who bravely put their lives on the line, of
which some have already died, is a situation no Canadian would
tolerate if they knew these freely available facts to decide
for themselves. Sure we can be counted lucky that only so few
Canadians have died thus far, but when will the sacrifice of
Americans, Afghanis, Iraqis, and soon to be Iranians with the
Syrians, along with more than fifty other countries officially
marked for death by the lawlessly irrational bushite
terrorists, be more than YOUR willing to bare? As publicly
reported repeatedly in European press, Mr. Sattler ordered
the bombing of health care clinics in Fallujah as first strike
targets because he didn't want doctors or nurses to "falsely"
report that his forces target primarily the innocent to steal
more from America in blood and treasure. Then under Sattler's
command, they proceeded to monstrously murder more than two
hundred thousand innocent souls, while covering the region in
radio-active toxic waste that will continue to kill for a
scientifically estimated billion or two years. Hell on Earth
is what un- arrested Sattler represents as an enemy to all
living things. God included. An aside: Did you know the
commander of the Third Infantry, Maj. Gen. Buford 'buff'
Blount III, is truly a Saudi Wahhabist in disguise, who took
up the job at the request of the Bush junta, and subsequently
left near 170 tons of plastic explosives unprotected for
looting in Qaqaa? Why? Well when asked why he commanded to
leave the weapons unattended to instead, go carnage Baghdad,
with, I'm serious, sanctioned thieving expeditions, he
replied, he just wanted to let us know he was there. "We just
wanted to let them know that we're here.'' In Basra, the
coalition is still leaving as of last week, more than 30 known
weapons storage facilities unprotected. See, the neo-con
peenacker gang can't steal everything without a stupid man war
going. Left continuing unattended without national
discussions, leaves further in it's wake, more innocent
victims of war crimes fallen undefended. I would ask that
instead of me seeking to find where it is written, that the
RCMP must be committed to getting the man for nine eleven,
perhaps I can just request we work together, for a national
CBC radio forum kicked off by some kinda joint, international
press release acknowledging briefly our failures to
communicate in the past, and politely request where Canada
could go through open line discussions on these very serious
matters. We must not allow our soldiers to be made
misinformed by CBC's unwillingness to bravely with honor,
defend our great Nation. Or, perhaps, Canada might want to
consider hiring me on as, we'll see how it goes honorary RCMP
spokesperson?, a paid consultant for my expertise in
recognizing the real bad guys, and then I'll go out there, and
win the good fight by using praise with fewer insults. If we
stay committed to defending freedom by defeating war
criminals, we all will be the better for it. Now, take me to
your leader.

2. Local Police Issues

As so was brought to the attention of the Courts in the
previous motions, through considering the charge that was
brought against me, (where no criminal intent in alleged, and
nobody can possibly see a digital image until it is already at
least in one's possession, case closed, I'm free to go still
without my stolen computer gear.) I discover, the child
exploitation unit is not operating in a manner that would
effectually reduce the proliferation of truly illegal
materials. They have included images to demonize me that they
must know are left legal to distribute, or for those couple
images categorized as for sure illegal unto themselves, are
left publicly unhindered when it comes to Police questioning
in a manner that would concern illegal public expressions.
Now, I personally don't believe the Courts are consciously
operating in a nefarious manner deliberately to steal computer
gears to sell as sadomasochists who enjoy seeing lovers of
life go to prison falsely for five year stints, but come on,
something seriously needs to be done in how things there are
run. I believe the failures are, in part, do to the personal
fears officers have of the information universe; for to
acknowledge information sharing through p2p networks or
Usenet, would be to witness criminal code violations by the
score going corporately unaddressed. Like Bush being guilty
for high treason in God's America for example, Iraqi church
goers slaughtered by faithful Bush lovers, women raped by
"freedom fighting" GIs, the sex slave trade, or that VLT's are
being run criminally (section 209, 380(1) 380(2), 181, 52(1-4)
with a math game scam that even a sixth grader can figure, but
not the "Free Press" editor, or commercial savvy CJOB's Vic
G-----. Being our city's big Bush backers, where our dying
universe is simpler, like "we don't need any evidence, we know
he's guilty", refuses a, trying to be responsible citizen to
formulate their own conclusions through our media on why we
have laws. Anyway, I need to have some one to cross check the
"illegal" images through recorded internet domains, to see
which ones are/were located in Canada and elsewhere, and what
if any attempt the exploitation unit tried to limit found
providers. I suspect many providers they would claim they
can't do anything about, are so not because a crime is
occurring, but in that respect, actual evidence of criminal
conduct would be required before an internet provider, server,
or site owner could be recommended for censorship. Not this,
twenty year olds look like they could be ten year olds, or
that, simply naked children being human should not be viewed
in their/our minds as something youthfully beautiful.

To Police effectually, I would suggest a public domain
transparently coded checksum program checker to automatically
recognize, known illegal materials made available free, with a
downloadable database updated by the work of one or two
officers monitoring currently available internet image traffic
- classifiable almost near the speed of electricity across the
country. This action is good to take despite my personal
innocence or fraudulent guilt, for media labelings are
completely impossible to designate content/control, but as
such, shouldn't forbid Police services from locating where
possibly actual hugely offensive content is being distributed
through. With volunteer co- operation of programming, a user,
server, or internet service provider could be warned of
material almost in their possession as expression is
classified criminal so then simply delete it, and carry on.
I'm confident such Police planning with open for public
appeals to fine tune further, would end putting the hugely
profitable exploitation units across the continent almost
completely out of business. Now, who truly wants that?

3. Constitutional Challenges

This possession charge absent intent, where everybody is auto
guilty to lose all their stolen computer gear through
fraudulent demonization of the innocent included, is a for
sure, crime in progress. I'd imagine if we had a public
inquiry, we'd find what the exploitation crews are doing, is
needing to locate only a small few arguably illegal
depictions, then trumping up a lot of fraudulent totals.
Figuring, I'd imagine, if they openly started convicting
individuals for a couple of images they perhaps deleted when
witnessed, people might begin to ask, just how much money is
the unit taking in sold stolen merchandise? Perhaps 50,000
dollars in a single case where the business owner of said
stolen property wasn't even charged for a criminal offense!
No troublesome Court appearance required to protect your
public business image even! Generally, in cases that do reach
trial, all images are seldomly reviewed by the Courts, and at
the "professional" porno viewers discretion, or the Crown, a
small sample is only offered. [The professional naked people
person they have in my case I suspect is lost somewhere in
bushville as the clinically insane, or just extremely helpful
to my Judicial cause, thanks big guy, either way.] This has
worked largely unhindered because lawyers for the defense
wouldn't generally see a connection. For only one freely
available image that you couldn't see until you already had
it, is all that is needed to put a, loss for words Canadian,
in prison for half a decade. Not only that, but such
convictions insist irrationally that the guilty must also be
sexually deviant and require professional counseling. The law
enforced absent rights infringed needs to be Constitutionally
challenged as clearly unjust, and the sentencing structure as
being seriously cruel. [What does one guilty of an actual
assault for comparison get, or better yet, threat of assault
that was never truly made?] So, as a result, I need the
assistance of Constitutional lawyers who would provide me
consultations on prepatory requirements and on the relevant
Constitutional questions regarding this specific challenge.
And maybe co-operation with the Crown or Police chief to tally
records and total sales figures on cases under similar
circumstances to consider the exploitation unit for
re-evaluation. [Example: The foolish, faith in ignorance
argument given by all similar units, is that nothing can be
securely deleted from a hard drive is assuredly patently
ridiculous. Truly indicative however, that we do indeed have
a real hidden problem here regarding their/our intelligence
gathering capabilities.] While maybe supporting public
discussions on how to even improve further, the valuable work
that the exploitation unit surely does do already somewhere
I'm sure to operate for our interests. We may together have
to overthrow CJOB with our human skills at demanding some
space to talk about bettering our lives by communicating
without two minute commercials every five minutes, and opening
up the phone lines to talk about whatever. They take too much
from us as the clearly disenfranchised already. Like, so
who's talk radio station is it anyway?

4. The Crown's Crown

I have concerns regarding the job requirements that our
community asks a Crown to bravely achieve. One, would be to
pursue Justice for the principled betterment of our society.
It is clear to anyone familiar with my case, that our
corporate media managers have decided for one fear or another,
that such noble reaches must be left from the grasp of
Canadian soldiers and their loving giving families. This
place the Court holds of a principle that all people should be
treated fairly, includes those we know Bush has already had
murdered in America under these left silenced demands for a
true accounting by good police work completed already. The
fear that every criminal Court Crown shrugs off when proudly
defending the innocent in our legal challenges, seems thus
far, absent in support of Justice for Johnny. When I read
statements from the Crown stating, John's legal arguments
against traitor Bush is irrelevant to the case our Crown
hold's against myself, in our name as Canadians, smacks of an
unjust and blind totalitarian state. Corporately broadcasted
uncertainty is forsaking the innocent lives of Bush's
continuing real murder victims. Certainly, the Crown has a
responsibility to pursue just causes, and granted, can falsely
suspect I don't hold the best of intentions towards life with
everything I am. However, the Crown's summations of my
character will never change the official FBI's conclusions
arrived at by following the crime scene leads, at the real
murder scene, to discover who personally is still escaping
arrest for mass murder of our good friends in New York City on
9/11. A crime who's principle perpetrators obviously
faithfully count on this form of injustice to dictate
continuous failures by our Crown to serve our public interest.
For whatever reason, my case documents a corporate news agenda
of non-committal in our pursuit of Justice for ourselves as
the little people. Ourselves, including the Crown's of all
Canada, are, without doubt, denied fair representation by CBC
standards. Canada is being left not defending honorable
American police officers, doing their jobs to the best of
their ability, should not leave too, our Public's Crown
unrepresented. (If the Crowns of Canada so willed it in our
names.) So, I would ask that the Crown's refusal to speak out
for Canada, while fighting to silence my cries with an unjust
as cruel prison sentence, be investigated for obstructing
Justice, and therefore, aiding and abetting the terrorist
crimes of first degree mass murder. Now, how to do this...
I'm not sure. Perhaps the Court's assistance of aid in the
form of one or two Crown offices from a different province in
Canada could be considered, or a Constitutional Law firm more
up on what all I got to work with here. Look, somebody has
tricked my nation, and subsequently our naiver youths, into
excepting Canadians can not hear the silenced screams of
global tyranny. If soldiers the world over need to die for
Bush, let it be for something worth fighting. Freedom must be
Canada, a Canada that would go if asked, in favor of Universal
Justice always. Just ask US.

Your Friend,

John W.


I know I'm innocent under the law as it currently stands, and
in addition, I wished to teach our Courts why the law stands
unjust against our public in other respects. With no criminal
intent to obtain or distribute something illegal alleged
against myself, and the simple truth that one can not perceive
an image until it is at the very least, already in one's
possession, says enough by itself. But most importantly, the
Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my
expressions. Example: I could have in my possession a
written work from one who espouses the glories of war criming,
but I, personally, am diametrically opposed to it's unwise
declarations. I still use it however to gain understanding of
my world in which I politically work to improve God's World
through indivisibly principled reason.

Feel free to do with this as you will.





For an Order of Production






This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to
have disclosed to the defense, the complete evidence without
undue hindrance, evidence the Crown holds against the accused
as a member of our public. These following arguments are the
reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person
shall be deprived of life, liberty or security of the person
except in accordance with the principles of fundamental

R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a
general duty to disclose all relevant information."

In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once
again, as any legitimate Court of any land would, that the
accused in criminal cases has a Constitutional right to full
and complete disclosure of the Crown's case. Yet, in the
criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return
my legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is
motivated by contempt for fundamental justice - for true
accountability - by intentionally working to deceive our
Courts through denying the evidence of one: the charge
against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands
currently, and two: that I don't already have the silent
moral support of every honorable top secret intelligence
officer this world over.

Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian
Officials in Relation to Maher Arar"

"The RCMP notes that because national security investigations
are criminal investigations, the possibility of judicial
scrutiny always exists and the presence of this possibility
acts as an indirect accountability mechanism." [Maher Arar was
an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the
irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing
Canadian jurisprudence.]

Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the
evidence the Crown holds against myself, to indicate a
possibly hidden motive behind her criminal allegations. For
it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown holds
any legitimacy.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust
Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but
for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus
rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands
of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls.

I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to
counter balance the false interpretations the Crown alleges,
when it comes to asking where specifically the rights of a
child are being compromised when she makes her defined as
sexually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my
computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions.
Similarly, are all the written texts on my computer those of
words I hold to be my own personal philosophy. As indicated
by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense
against fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our
children being compromised, can be readily addressed early on
by understanding the possession charge in relative context to
the personal life of the accused.

R. v. Sharpe

"Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that
serves an "educational, scientific or medical purpose". This
refers to the purpose the material, viewed objectively, may
serve, not the purpose for which the possessor actually holds

So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must
therefore, be backed firstly by criminal intent, for without
any intent you have no purpose. A defense is made available
by the Sharpe decision on personal\professional conduct to
indicate actual established purpose of accused to prevent
blind "overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep
concerns of "overreaching" are very much apparent in my
particular criminal matter. Conduct of individuals who have
lost their purpose in Police keeping, who aren't being managed
to express through our Police actions, a public interest in
where the "offensable" images are coming from, or came, but
instead, where it's all going as potential new innocent porno
victims with millions of dollars worth of stuff they can get
away stealing. [I've read porno cops in America recently
acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid,
off of one single server found managed in violation, but have
taken a pause before then moving on to arrest anybody who has
ever used the internet for whatever, to consider, just what
have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly legal
imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly
by the weaker irrationals that exist within our police
services. Where, to prove for the record, a twenty two year
old is only twelve, even when she has in her possession all
her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living mother, a
popular working web site and historical documentations, is
just foolishly impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer
Citizen, your demonized guilty, until proven innocent of
thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do
practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish
intent, they make off like bandits. See, under a simple
possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to obtain
or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a
responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which
the criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The
last thing we want in our dying world is a setup where private
legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing content
that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes
into your home to steal your stuff by grossly misunderstanding
what the threat actually is.

By exercising our right to perceive representations of that
which is made freely available, is of in itself, important to
the sociologist, psychologist, concerned parent, and of
course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our shared

My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who
are personally responsible in escaping arrest for running
death squads against innocent children in Afghanistan financed
by the undefended as uniformed American tax paying Public,
[10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still cashing
in on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the
dropping of cluster dud land mines throughout residential
school districts to murder our children indiscriminately.
Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause irreparable
damage to North American children, or as currently, about John
DeCamp's just released updated 2005 edition, about the secret
White House-linked national child sex-ring entitled "The
Franklin Cover-up." However, the real motivating factor
[intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our
public's right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more
specifically because I articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official
publicly available findings on who orchestrated, and funded
the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. along with his
business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General
Mahmoud Ahmad.

[University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has
researched the Ahmad/Bush relationship as documented by CNN
ABC et al, and can be quested for at www.globalresearch.ca]


The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily
verifiable mass murder issue, is indicative of an intention,
to cast aside the concern of all children who benefit from my
communicating higher truths for the betterment of the entire
public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our
public truthfully as I do, that the "scumbags" Canada's own
General Hillier is referring to get Canadian youths for sure
killed over in his nationally broadcasted barbaric adolescent
bigotry, against all the INNOCENT students of Afghanistan, is
of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under
the Taliban's getting better through communicating
leadership?, and who outlawed Bush's heroin production, and
the slavery and rape of women? Women who were when working at
the Taliban's newspaper, were not required to wear burkas
despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would
suggest her ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her
case against me, for those children's lives, and others like
them, are not who she is working to protect. So, where I
demand is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the
hiding in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly in the
light of these proceedings to our Honorable Lord.

The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal
images, can be sited under a labeled classification of
"collateral images", as somehow, unto it's separated self,
being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled character.
Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the luxury
and comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the
significant meaning of each of these collateral damages
against ourselves as the innocent the Crown argues for as a
weapon of Justice. For, those personally responsible for
making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with
the evidence the Crown refuses to return to me as my legal
property, are in all likelihood, still blabbering corporately
un-accosted, the completely blind support of indiscriminate
mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to
Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat
leader. While myself, am a well documented public defender of
children's rights and a studious observant researcher on media
matters, who is schooled in the field(s) of Psychology and
Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along with the chaotic order
to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who when
not terribly busy building this needed defense against the
Crown's alleged criminality, still champion the written word
for Justice being - US all as treated fairly.]]

I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of
another's expressions, of some managed images, or some strewn

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust
Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but
for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus
rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands
of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While
sitting just outside my police door, could be the public
accuser who professes proudly the deeply ignorant ungodly
beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push US all over
the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing such an
enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true
personal self contempt, is there still escaping public
ridicule, wearing our community's Police Officer uniform,
could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on my part,
for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A
honorable defender that is needing by threat of false
imprisonment to concentrate on Justice for just myself
personally currently. As the Court well knows, a bushite's
favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as
documented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized
lawless through the mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose
for the don't know knowing any better.] There exists no
evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any factually
alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts
unchallenged nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did
actually let the inspectors in to go where ever they wanted
without delay. Furthermore, indiscriminately murdering people
with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000
missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000
pound bombs containing radio-active toxic waste, along with
the new and improved napalm and phosphorous poison gas clouds
all because we are in the approximate age range of 15 to 55 is
a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by the
Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in
jeopardizing the lives of our children for sure by working to
silence my extremely rare public cries for true accountability
here in Winnipeg.

I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions
and praised world wide word. The National Supreme Court of
Canada's Sharpe decision allows this defense to be made on our

By Our Honorable Court's "Lord" siding to support claims made
by my false accusers - as the running definitive summation of
what can be claimed as "collateral images" - [legal relative
media content present on my computer,] while judging to refuse
to have returned my therefore stolen legal property so I can
adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's
confusions, is nothing short of a crime in progress. At least
it should be. By denying me the evidence the Crown holds in
contempt of our Court, would create an undue hardship on my,
seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points.
Having to travel back and forth across the city to view
hundreds of thousands of media messages pertinent to my case
at hand, left denied search tools, and a comfortable
atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I know,
I have to deal personally with those who support such a
criminal ungodly nature when I have no choice to, but to have
them located in the same listening vicinity throughout all my
inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew their
boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great
George W. Bush is as their master thinking celebrated
American Cop Killer, would leave me unfairly tensioned. I
need the meditative comforts of home study with good coffee
and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense
with the evidence I demand the fair right to contend.

I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense
stands I've made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to
think my way on anything. The Crown has no right to dictate
what my private thoughts are, especially, if I'm not granted
to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence she
don't want me to have returned possession of. My legal
property that the Crown's crew has plans to sell! God, are
you listening?

I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used
to surmise her relative faulting judgment of my worth to our

I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real
expressions such as public communications, to fairly challenge
the Crown's refusal to consider such objectiveness on who the
one holding criminal intent actually is on this serious
matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed
by our law to sell my stolen property as they are planning,
while surely as sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my
written works they know mean a great deal to me personally.
Wishing to deprive our rights as the community, to be granted
fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is
surely what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge
honorably against the Crown and grant me the legal return of
my stolen property. I need to establish the mechanics of my
specifically unique computer system, so I can establish my
fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of Canada's
Standing Sharpe decision.

The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal
possessions serve a criminal purpose without any intent,
unless found serving otherwise by made available evidence from
the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge] Evidence of
real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court,
because usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's
stolen stuff actually. And truly, the Crown has expressed no
interest in assisting our Police agencies in apprehending
those known responsible by the evidence for first degree mass
murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little
Jewish man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot
nazi fascists under Hitler would have too. [surprising for
many, it is formally illegal to be Jewish currently in God's
Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the Judge, well
they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far... But
this innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended
truths thing for me is just some extreme to the core serious
business of ours, and good or bad, the Judges, and the Crowns,
and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by following the
rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and
you. So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news
agencies to live up to our responsibilities by recognizing
standing laws not yet enforced against the un-elected
dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor
criminal, 911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present

I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument]
images to sensibly consider their feasibility to collectively
represent the Crown's faulting illogical argument in a
brighter picture.

I need to show what I did with obtained media information on
general terms by mechanical processing through my very
specific as unique operating systems, and through my
definitive writing on the very subject we are here
considering. I need operating script batch programs that do
specific tasks regarding general media managements.

I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet
knowledge sharing web communications system] is used, and how
it was legally accessed by my specific personal system,
granting me, to be a part of one of the greatest collected
artistic expressions of the known world. And how, when using
such services, informations aren't found perceived until, at
the very least, they are already in one's possession, thereby
making the Crown's standing accusation absent criminal intent
clearly unjust. [those responsible for
distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions
are where the infraction against the public's interest can be
compromised, but the exploitation units I'm aware of seem to
have little of no financial interest in recognizing such a
wanting to lose their lucrative industry brokered through what
should be worked to be made into redundancy.]

I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for
indicative examples of huge disparities with what is described
with the Crown's own relative definitions, and what my media
machine actually contains regarding my for real expressions.
I need to reference my personal writings surmising the
faulting state of the child porn policing industry. To
surmise grand totals, as such the Crown's crew alleges of
legal content she'll bemoan despairingly of collateral damages
against us as innocence. Knock knock knock.

If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is
irrelevant to her criminal case, then what could the harm be
honestly in showing the error of her ways? If she argues it
jeopardizes to expose the true criminality used to try
convicting me, an innocent honorable man in Our name, I would
move that the charge against me be stayed, my property
returned, and the Courts help me make a Constitutional
challenge to the validity of the law, while communicating also
Your dissatisfaction in not having us heard speaking out
nationally for the truly Honorable FBI - against 911's true
money man - Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad - getting away as
bush's not so secret any longer private business partner,
escaping he is from the mass murder of thousands of our good
friends, the still left undefended corporate Americans.

I need to know what settings were set in place for the
installed programs to access the internet. And a whole bunch
else besides.

In conclusion, I need to show where my outstanding character
was at, by indicating exactly what I spent my free time on, to
illustrate for our Court, my TRUE intent as motive on this

Yours truly,






for the Crown to Stay Proceedings






The Validity of the Law

While true, to distribute material in an abusive form of
sexually explicit child pornography, can have a detrimental
impact on the impressionable, being in simple possession, does
not connotate the same negative risk to the public body. It
is not a Freedom of Expression issue. All the pictures on my
computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Nor,
importantly, can digital images be perceived, until, at least,
they are already in your possession. Under current law, as is
in my case, you're already guilty on nothing. So, if you
should see something arguably imprisoning, you're too late to
point fingers elsewhere.

It's analogous to you sitting in your parked car with someone
throwing through the opened window, a closed paper bag of
crack cocaine, followed behind by an arresting police officer,
who while cuffing you hears your plead that some completely
unknown person threw the innocuous unmarked bag through the
window, leaving the unjust officer of our law, to reply for
the record "Yeah, I saw the, left to go on his own "stranger"
do it. And it's a crime in this country don't you know to be
found in simple possession? Now, where are the keys to the
trunk of this fancy car I'm planning to sell for a tidy profit
crack head loser?"

The Crown appears under this law in my case to have no need to
prove a criminal intent to do her things.

See, under a simple possession charge, there is no allegations
of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and

likewise, not found a responsible public's interest in seeking
the means of which the criminal content was as could be
LEGALLY distributed. The last thing we want in our dying
world is a setup where private legal businesses are selling,
promoting, and releasing content that only becomes illegal
when the exploitation unit comes into your home under false
pretences to steal all your electronic stuff by grossly
misunderstanding what the threat actually is.

A digital image isn't possibly perceived until it is at least,
already in your possession. Making the standing law as it is
interpreted by the faulting Crown, unjust. No criminal intent
is alleged by my sole possession charge, but for by myself
against the Crown's secret bushite crew for aiding and
abetting the crimes of first degree mass murder in New York

An infraction against the public's interest occurs when such
materials are expressed through distribution. Digital images
of people posing as testaments to the beauty of being human,
are not the same as expressions of sexually exploited
children. Yet, from as near as I can tell, the threat of
seriously cruel and inhuman treatment against me with a five
year prison sentence is being made because the Crown has made
included, condemnable interpretations of the public's free
expressions of youth and beauty. Again, not my own. Leaving
still no made interest in understanding where these prison
term perceptions, that are often admitted by the Crown's crew
to be legal, originated. If the Crown's case remains
standing, why shouldn't we expect the child exploitation units
to then widely distribute as near as can be Barely Legal
materials in hopes to nab more of us as the fearful to be
shamed as criminal through threatened public Court proceedings
regarding your alledged deviant private sexual thoughts? Of
legal images perceived as a god honest, testimony of youth and
beauty, being ourselves beautifully youthful, could leave you
too as depicted hiding some unknown something about your
unseen character. Or, an even worse madness, exploitation
units distributing truly illegal depictions, named maybe after
car models, to see who could be made found only in simple
possession of the accusers relative perception?

For, if the internationally popular woman depicted was well
over eighteen and had her own legal website, don't matter for
indictment, cause the expert of expert experts they have in my
case, a double full time professional computer porno viewer,
states with a complete straight face, the full figured pubic
wisped woman, he knows nothing of, is really only ten or
twelve. You're for sure either normal being human, or guilty
of thinking their bad thoughts punishable with real prison
sentences. As a result of course, I'm now demanded to divorce
my life of other critically important responsibilities, to
prove my complete innocence on these deliberately planned top
secret schemes, they didn't want You, the public to know of.
A near criminal attempt, (as documented by the now disclosed
once top secret warrant), to silence my cries for the arrest
of the publicly established factual 911 masterminds - Our Mr.
bush Jr., General Ahmad, rumsfeld, myers and cheney, along
with almost the entire senior staff of disclosed as flagrantly
criminal propaganda proliferators, The Office of Special

The Warrant details by exclusion, a deliberate top secret plan
on the Crown's part, a deviant anti-government plan to silence
my calls for accountability through my world wide public
addresses on the FBI answers still surrounding the murder of
thousands of American Citizens. The Crown, as an attempt to
undermine Liberty by thwarting me off my one chosen career
path of Universal Speaker, and fictionalized demon slayer -
leaves you instead, this quickly passing opportunity to stand
up for the rights of another being cheated for real, and in so
doing, we'll find together, that true freedom is justice for
US all. Law stands strong for good reason, so too, does
tyranny rule by censorship for false imprisonment. Do not
allow my voice for freedom's reign to be silenced unjustly, by
those who would have us falsely believe, Bush personally
didn't do the crimes we all easily now know the evidence of.

An unjust Law enslaves all Religions, for reason is
beautifully Just through your will to conceive, that God's
interests are as naturally too, your own included. My
commitments to equal rights for all have never changed, and
Humanity's true commitment to defend Iraqi children to the
last cowardly murderous thieving bushite enemy, will carry on,
despite the corrupted Crown's attempt to stop real Justice
from continuing. When one views public photographs of
rumsfeld's un-arrested mercenary soldiers raping an Iraqi
woman, are our rights being further violated with every
passing witness? How about witnessing that Guantanamo's
torture victim Moazzam Begg, was running a girl's school
program with his wife under the female loving Taliban? [You
know, Moazzam Begg, the one and same British Citizen depicted
solely by heroin pushing donald "sexy cluster dud land mine
dropper" rumsfeld, as one of our Lord's most dangerous

The Crown alleges in truly contemptuous silence, she's not
interested in defending the rights of those children, or
victims of mass murder, while voicing publicly in Our Court,
that I, am infringing on the rights of children somewhere else
because, even though no body is perceiving the data located
anywhere on my hard drive, it still magically constitutes a
personal violation, on its own by itself, of an unjust law
that others have been demonized, robbed, then falsely
imprisoned on. This irrational demand on behalf of the Crown
to Your Court, where she states her private viewings do not
infringe on children's rights, while EVERYONE else's does
somehow, even if you didn't see at all the picture judged as
the reflecting mind of a true sexual deviant, is US ALL being
the auto-guilty anyway, and not firstly innocent as it should
be. See, the Judge could say to a Jury, "Your job is not to
judge the injustice committed with these blind and broken
laws, but that solely, did Top Cop Johnny have this one single
picture on his computer?, and if he did, then the bushite
liars who fight our systems of accountability through Justice
to further escape real rapists, torturers, and documented
treasonous war criminals like those who for sure committed
911, get to put him in Our prison for half a decade."

However this issue requires much for further study. It turns
out my two primary accusing officers who deal with real sicko
child porn every day full time, also support death squads
against innocent families in Afghanistan to protect the demon
lies of George W. Bush, and they'd almost tell the jury that
too as blind devote disciples of the self hating bushmob cabal
of neo-con peenackers, if the Crown wasn't there to forbid the
truth from being spoken.

The two abusers, the two anti-cop officers of question, lied
to me, then censored my agreement they had their word on,
then, attempted to twist my comments into something clearly I
didn't mean.. and that's not even the half of it. So, don't
tell me I'm being over critical of their naked wicked evil.
If an image was an offensive act witnessed, why then is it
that a genuine concern is not with a possible victim all the
time? The shocker to the uninitiated in the battles of good
against evil in these child exploitation units, is that rarely
do they have a real monetary care to follow though with the
details. - "Oh, the girl is really a woman, and the web
address on the digital image is of a server acting completely
within the confines of our law, nudist campers are nudist
campers, and as for the beautifully naked young girl taking a
bubble bath smiling, er.. I mean the one looking seductive...
drat." Examples: I have many texts willfully ignored by the
Crown that articulate irrational praise for one heinous crime
against God or another of the un-elected neocon war wankers,
that I, as a human, certainly don't find myself in automatic,
no free thought agreement with., right? And my objective as
Human defender isn't to censor the known criminality of the,
murder innocent people for the war profiting bushmob liars,
but to expose the true injustice committed against our better
selves - US all dying slavishly censored through Our corporate
international communication network of good old ideas left
long gone dead and buried. Hammurabi's Code of Law: it's
first sentence, of his first paragraph, the number one most
important Law as example. - Here's the translation - The
public figure blaming someone else for a capital offense, such
as terrorist, who uses NO EVIDENCE for PROOF, to murder in
Your name as Citizen, is the FOR SURE ENEMY, always, EVERY
TIME. And in the next four thousand years that single law has
timelessly stood unbroken, not one person has been capable to
declare a true, wanting disagreement.

The corporate news mandate is to take You for granted -
without any given say so. Our sold as sworn public defenders,
CBC, CNN, et al, hold no opinions of our Humanity on the
needless indiscriminate bombing of populated cities, the
torturing of men women and children by un-arrested as openly
confessed complete psychotics, the thieving of hundreds of
billions from America and Iraq, and as such, tyrannically
support [don't call us, will call you] commi censorship, all
done in to assist the "escape" of those truly responsible for
the crimes of 911.

When the Crown argues that disturbing images simply in your
possession constitute an absolute evaluation of your
punishable character, while denying\forbidding a Court to know
what you do in your life with our time is faulted. I hold
children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've
made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my
way on anything. The Crown has no right to dictate what my
private thoughts are. This insistence on behalf of the Crown
on what we all perceive individually by judgment is determined
solely by media content - is a foolish falsehood forwarded by
Our Great Lord's, Supreme Court of Canada. Example: Does not
the public videos of rumsfeld's, defended from YOUR LAW
bushite soldiers, gunning down women and children running for
their lives from a mosque, or where hundreds of unarmed
defenseless families are huddled together, then bombed by a
bushite enemy grunt, a grunt who on VIDEO TAPE, moans itself
to orgasm when they all die as the innocent murdered with
"ah.. dude" just speak for itself? Sure, the celebrating
bushies repeatedly depicted have no honor, or courage, only a
fascistic hatred for their fellow man - openly thieves who die
without a fighting cause for Freedom, nor a true commitment to
Law - but I would ask if We had a voice to cry in Your Court,
what do You see in this corporate World that leaves my stand
professionally unworthy for deliberations? The Crown's
concern remains silent on the DOCUMENTED and easily verifiable
murder issues, when she has her regular huddles with a local
corporate reporter, discussing on who, from the community, was
in Our court challenging, a sexually dysfunctional
sadomasochistic label. For the Crown to witness and know
first hand of such barbaric criminality, such as the true
perpetrators of 9/11 found revealed by THE FBI stinger, along
with the rest of the evidence trail that all leads directly to
the Whitehouse, is a Crown who does not hold Canadian's
freedom in check, or a care for our soldier aged sons and
daughters conflicting near death. But to side instead, as
they are hiding behind the honorable Crown's position, a small
group of four or five dim blips, attempting they are to
silence these calls for real freedom for the masses. I am a
proud and honorable man who objects to furthering bush's war
crime aims with this lifeless corporate tyranny of enslavement
through whoring for the dark foreboding wills of Our Mr. bush
Jr.. Censorship is the tool of tyrants, while I beckon a new
light for peace by communicating. Please, I beg you, do not
allow them to silence my objections to have us unjustly
imprisoning myself, while bringing great hardship to my
immediate family by denying the truth be spoken publicly in my
defense on why I'm in the Court room, and what is documented
irrespective of their spin doctoring and label pasting.

Where is the violation of a child's rights, specifically, when
the Crown's crew gleefully ponder images she'll use to silence
the words of Johnny Wizard by prison sentence? Where? No,

Commanding our public indignation for those who disrespect
human rights she will use as her weapon, all the while, hidden
from the jury, and the judge, a secret contempt for thousands
of innocent murder victims denied my unchallenged demands for
real Justice. No officer of our laws anywhere have found
fault with my PUBLIC summation, documented fully, on who, and
how, 9/11 was truly orchestrated. A Crown stuck committed to

global bushite tyranny Vs. a Truth seeker of the highest
order. Come to the trial! Tell your friends! Tell your
neighbors! The People vs. an overburdened unjust Crown, and
a near treasonous national security officer, who wrote in the
original top secret warrant nobody was suppose to see, it'd be
so much easier to help bush escape arrest by avoiding the
public accountability process entirely. The once top secret
Johnny Wizard Warrant is freely available with most names
being detracted, to protect the innocent until proven guilty.
A traitor to God and Country the Crown and one National
Security officer potentially is in this top secret bush
administration conspiracy endeavor, to serve by bushite
criminal decree up here in defenseless Canada. For as
potential accessories to first degree mass murder, they are
stuck attempting to undermine Canada's National Security
Services, the FBI, the People, US, all to further unjustly
sacrifice, more of our uninformed sons and daughters for
further bounty, as substantiated real world criminal, bushite
evils. I say no. Help me get public recognition through talk
radio, take a stand for your fellow man, and help a Jury in
Winnipeg learn of who I am, and why they are forbidden to know
what's truly going on, and you'll be helping yourself to a
better future. My principle allegations against George W.
Bush require a qualified and adapt security officer no more
that forty three minutes to verify. Namely, bush's business
partner, General Ahmad funded 911's "mastermind" "ringleader"
Atta, and was also sent, the General was, from the Whitehouse
on behalf of bush to the Taliban stating, no evidence will be
brought against Laden as the accused, therefore an innocent
man in Christ. And, that as MSNBC reported of the top secret
documents provided to themselves anonymously from Condoleezza
Rice's office, George had a confidential plan at his desk on
how to invade Afghanistan dated September 9th, 2001 that he
didn't want anybody in America to know he was working on
during his "vacation". His confessed publicly to MSNBC, as
"fully implemented" Afghanistan strategy, demanded that he not
pursue the true 911 evil doers, for it would upset his made
before hand, guaranteed plan. That had soldier grunts moving
out to get ready just before the event. All premised on
blaming Laden as a terrorist without a shred of evidence, for
a crime that hadn't yet taken place, but that bush was
personally prepared as closing investigations on. To secure
criminal invasion he would refuse to follow the evidence trail
- and as a result - NOT apprehend the have to let go - falsely
accused bin Laden. [cowardly soldiers who didn't speak up as
real Patriots would have much earlier, who were ordered to let
Laden go on his way in Torra Borra, have now all mostly fallen
quietly dead., by fluke mishap or something like the sort it
is said.] All set in play, this plan of Our Mr. bush Jr's,
top secretly with General Ahmad riding gun shot, just days
before thousands of American People were still left
unaccountably murdered. See? Mr. Bush would need such an
event to happen unhindered as a requirement to galvanize world
sentiment. Providing no evidence substantiated would
guarantee his needed invasion for American pension thievers
Enron, and that is exactly what HE planned, what HE did, and
who HE is. Evil is the deceived disguised. What more do you
need to know buddy?

I, armed with only the facts, demand the arrest of those who
participated in the murder of children to protect the demon
lies of George W. Bush, while the Crown's case, on top of
alleging that the simple possession Law [no criminal intent to
express or obtain is alleged] states a child's rights are
being infringed on due to the content by itself, ALONE,
appears ready to fight for disallowing a jury, to freely
witness, this fishing expedition was intentionally started to
stop me speaking my outrage that bush hasn't been yet arrested
for committing 9/11 with General Ahmad, so according to the
unmentionables in the no longer top secret Warrant. That this
Crown would officially state holding our virtues while
attempting to condemn me to a long prison sentence, shows her
possible personal true contempt for the value of Your human

life my friend. I have written extensively on defending the
rights of children, and the psychology of sexually
dysfunctional sadomasochists, I have studied this world to
create some thing greater than average, some thing better than
normal, a world where all children are respected, including
those of Iraq who have been purposefully denied safe drinking
water, because negroponte needed to STEAL the emergency funds
for his new embassy. See?, she would argue that those real
world crimes aren't relevant to my case in her hands, those
REAL children like perhaps your own don't concern her, nor do
the lives of Canadians lied to by corporate command for
criminal sacrifice. The Crown convinces us irrationally, with
her only excuse being, because the specific broken Law she's
decided to singly exercise, (with the exclusion of all others,
like thou shall not murder,) stupidly says she can, and you
dummies can't do anything at all about it yourself. Why?
Because you wont speak out for anyone else's rights to be
heard publicly - the bushite enemy trust to figure. Justice
is Freedom, and to have a real concern for another's lost
rights to freely be, is to be truly concerned with your very
own in serious jeopardy. I wouldn't lie to you. Believing,
as the bushite do, willfully deceitful corporate news
propaganda excuses the Bush Administration's rampant
criminality against the innocent as God is, truly, excuses
nothing, especially if I have something to say on the subject
of accountability.

This final Court challenge against my Freedom to be myself,
that the bush administration attempted firstly to do top
secretly, has now been laid publicly at our door step as a
blatant threat to everyone of us as a member of the Canadian
Public. Will you help me politely address my false accusers
on our public airwaves? Will you help speak for freedom from
tyranny is this question riddled, or will you deny yourself my
generous helping?

The reasons why such abhorrent behaviors continue unaddressed
in our Police Force actions will be documented fully with
remedies offered during the second part of the third phase of
the upcoming Question Period press conferences - press
conferences running during the available down times of The
Trial of



/ /And that of course gives the bushites and CBC and CNN their
implausible deniability, where they can say their remaining
neutral, by not providing us the facts to allow us to decide
for ourselves. Because otherwise, we wouldn't kill ourselves
to profit the bushmob cabal of God haters. Who victimize
innocent Christians for no other reason but for to profit off
our suffering.


Think of all those people in that situation as God. And
these, the bushite nazi grunts, have positions that are
completely irrational, they're making no sense, your fuking
up. It's like a cancer that God of that whole situation, is
inflicted with. They're lying to themselves. If your there
to fight on behalf of Iraqis, you take a position to demand
all the money that has been taken through this Iraq
Development Fund, be returned. \ \


/ / What is particularly disturbing is how the administration
misused intelligence information to make its case for war and
failed to plan competently for the postwar period. \ \

What seems even more disturbing, to me, and PBS' FRONTLINE, is
that there was a "State" plan, the ORHA plan to prevent
looting and carnage, but it was sabotaged by rumsfeld and
franks, so the bushmob could try to make some sense of
needlessly bombing the country for our labored dollars, while
robbing the central bank and museum by mopping up the mess
with the bodies of American Patriots still dying as dumfuks.


you know what is right, though you may still be blind, never too late to
change your mind, we are all in agreement, in truth we rise, evil is just the
deceived disguised...


Our Gambling Problem

Instead of our government deciding what services we need and are willing to
pay for, they'll have us think that by actively promoting gambling to those we
can take advantage of, somehow serves them right, and us well. This abnormal
behavior is not only destructive to many cheated players, their families and
friends, but also to our institutions, government, and economy. You may have
heard some say, that gambling is a tax on stupidity, and here are only some of
the reasons why. This information is for you to judge, think freely, ask the
questions, then pray your wrong. The whole VLT system our government uses is
so deeply flawed it's beyond belief. They count credits as dollars, reporting
to trusting economists and reporters, a payout of 96%. They will tell you
they're needed because otherwise the victims of manipulation would travel to
the states before the local state casinos to spend their last two bucks, and
they should, their odds are a real deal better. There are no checks and
balances in place as there is normally to regulate tax revenues. Nobody in
the corrupt gaming commission, MLC, AFM in fact Canada has looked at the
computer code, and in Montana where they have, they've made them illegal to
operate. They're not stupid. Some of the possible new car owners at the MLC,
state that the machines run on a random basis. They have deduced this by
testing that they are computers and can simulate a random number concluding
presumably that every computer program is just an act of chance. I guess the
free cars to some in management make this easier. If this is true, how come
no one ever wins more than a $1000? If, as they claim, it is random,
occasionally one might win $33 billion by starting at 125 credits doubling 30
times. Get a deck of cards and a calculator and try! Your odds are slim, but
at least you have a chance. If this type of psychological manipulation is to
be allowed, why not physiological as well. Why not put an odorless chemical
right on the pay slips that would leach through the players skin, causing them
to act against their better judgment? Body and mind? Here's a tip: Bar
owners are privy to much statistical information, that we, the general public
are not. If they play, your being really stupid. Also the machines are
filthy, wash your hands. You see, they're trying to turn us against each
other, into one of them, blinding us, making us lash out and cheat our weaker
brothers and their families, if it means we can drink their blood (190+
suicides last year). But in truth, we are all being bled. BAH HA! It is a
pure regressive tax, no attached goods or services! Billionaires own freezers
and stacks of paper! These players are REAL consumers, shopping and moving
the economy, if they hadn't lost all our money. Filmon was right wing when he
called in gambling for the stupid. Was not the reason for forcing the VLT's
into our homes to protect us from casinos? Were we not warned that if you
remove what would normally be consumer dollars from an economy, there would be
less there? If you call the gaming commission they take 4%, Manitoba lottery
books say 30%, but in truth they take all they take. They pull in
191,000,000- (not mentioning 92% casinos and the shut down of Crystal, not
enough money in an honest game of cards, and all those losing free $2 ticket
tickets) in revenues each year. If you divide revenues by 4813 odd machines,
313 odd days a year, holy Christmas, if they return 96%, that's close to a
payout of $3000 every day, every machine! Why don't we take 40%? We could
advertise the best odds in North America! It works well in Vegas, where they
actually give players a chance with games of chance, and because more than 50%
of the players are from out of state. In Oct 97, Nova Scotia gaming Corp.
head Ralf Fisk quit claiming his concerns were ignored, and his power was
stripped. In Dec 97, 5 of 6 B.C. gaming commissioners quit stating they felt
they were made redundant and could provide no significant contribution. I
guess the major media doesn't think this is worth knowing! If your lucky
enough to get a hold of any of the receipts that come out when the machines
are opened, or tilted, you'll see that if you count actual game-ply, some
bars, are taking 70%+ of the games and giving you all the credit. Churning of
credits with many NON- random events, and prize amounts are critical in
determining how much is actually removed and returned to our communities. Why
don't we promise a payout of 99.9%, we can still take the same amount of the
dollar. Couple extra play 5 win 5 backs, walla! Some gaming (don't say
lottery! VGT's?) information is classified information, so there are only a
small tiny few, who might know all the details, but refuse to tell anyone,
some by law or maybe threat. They destroy "gaming operations" records (VLT's
and casinos) yearly, but keep employee's names for fifty! (under MLF0028)
Their argument, that makes it illegal, for anyone to publicly disclose the
actual dollars, on a site by site basis was "site-holders could gain an unfair
advantage if they knew what their competitors were taking in" How? Don't they
already have one? If you average it out, bars are making close to ten grand a
machine per year, Just provide an addict a seat, and you can still pay your
waitresses minimum wage. People can be addicted to many things like VLT's or
peanuts, and they can be equally motivating, but they have different
consequences. It's nearly impossible to consume 500 dollars worth of peanuts
in 2 seconds, and how many entertaining peanuts are there, that leave you
smiling and filled with glee? Mr. dealer will you help these addicts see?
If you deposit a hundred thousand and then cash out without playing, it's now
short four thousand, and the bars, more flesh for the pound. If these bars
were ever caught committing such an act, they'd get a wink and 2 days of
profits taken, instead of time in Stony Mountain. If Stephenson did it, who
would know! They paid out 2.6 billion in credits, and took 191 in cash!
Should we, the fascists (look it up), support a predominantly VLT infested NDP
riding with provincial funding, nothing wrong with that, right? When
Stephenson (the same who told us no, we would never sell MTS, then sold it way
below value, hundreds of employee's fired, rates etc.) was asked way back on
June 24/95 in the Sun, why some areas such as Carman, Morden, Thompson, and
The Pas, were losing as much as 1.4 million yearly after counting provincial
grants Stephenson quipped "We have to make an assessment to make sure the
project makes economic sense for the area" the same story also informs us, we
guarantee a 10% return of gambling profit to our communities. So I guess that
means we're really stealing as much as 90%?#! Also in conjunction, we
threaten communities that don't want the machines, saying they wouldn't get
"revenues". Then shouldn't those that do, get theirs? Even if they did, how
would they? Would it be like the "well advertised" $25,000 VLT hearings held
between 1 and 4 on a weekday, where apparently only something like six from
Manitoba showed up, with nothing important to say. Is that imp lying a thread
to 1,043.863- of us, which of at least 96%, want to know where in hell they
are going. Can they be that stupid? Can we? We'd bet er.. not. If we were
misled, we should be outraged! There is nothing wrong with earning money, but
this is a great deal of money stolen off the backs of the sore, the
desperately poor, grocery stores and many many more. Is it because we think
we're only illegally (section 209, 380(1) 380(2), 181, 52(1-4) etc.) ripping
off evil welfare mothers with too much money in their pockets, or those
sinister seniors on some mental incomes? Many in the media mistakenly think
that if we cheat the poor and stupid into paying more in taxes, theirs will
equally go down. That is misguided, this regressive tax doesn't simply work
in this manner. In addition, the lotteries claim that 300 mill is spent in
salaries to less than 10000 employees. We know it's not into the workers at
the casinos or bars. Just what is the going rate for paper shredders? Are
there any other sides that should be at issues? Would you like all
information to make a sound right decision? Why would one would not? A
crucial trust is clearly being violated. I would suggest showing prudence
with where you place your full page ads until some of these serious questions
are addressed. Nobody is watching, nobody is really regulating, where are we?
Your dream of utopia? You'll have us pay huge taxes, take away tax benefits
from all renters($?) and single mothers, infants, create monopolies for your
sympathizing fascist supporters knowingly against the interests and wishes of
the vast majority, cut back on provincial welfare if necessary, liquidate
assets, screw the schools (you certainly don't need to be educated),
hospitals, breed a judicial system to keep us reminded while you drain the
entire economy, and if there's anything left over you'll give it to a private
Bank. Then blame the transfer reductions of 250 mill, call it billions, not
telling that your including all of Canada when your good for nothing, black
sheep brother comes beggin for a nickel. Better yet, you'll lock him up.
With faith that most !private! media won't bring up the fact that you pulled
in an extra 900, that social programs have been continually cut for the last
twenty years when compared to the GDP, that we don't even have to be borrowing
from American private banks, that we are in fact being robbed, or that your
brother was just hungry and hurt. How does anyone buy this? On credit?
Things are changing from bad to worse, and everybody appears, from one or two
media accounts, to think, so what or, whatever. Don't drink the water! A
part of the problem is the journalists who are in fact just trained reporters,
who take all the perks and none of the responsibilities. Selling off
themselves to something they have written, for them to read. Told what is
cover, where is resources, drawing our pictures with their color crayolas.
Telling themselves there must be a good reason why no one is doing the story!
Or they'll take any of a 1000, why think if you don't have work to? They know
the scores, much more money in advertising. The odds would also dictate a
small tiny informed few who have their minds made closed, polluted by greed,
and lack of power, looking at another side, pleading ignorance, they didn't
see anything at all, and say you won't either. Exercising power the only way
they can, draining from all, including themselves. Can you believe it? This
is our government re-appropriating billions of our dollars, causing economic
destruction and death! Leading the way to the misled and cheated is the well
paid AFM, advising us to only blame ourselves, and the best thing we could do
for ourselves is to drink at the bar/casino. It's akin to the schoolyard
heroin dealer paying some chump to quickly get help to misguided children by
selling them crack. Why bite the hand that stuffs you? Do you wonder what
happened to all our money? The truth is out, the lies are old, but the blind
idiots directing your show, don't want to see, you know. Do 300,000+ petition
signing Albertans, incidentally more than register to vote, know something you
don't? Studies galore! Watch what you support with money, and with your
thoughts. Do your own polls! Did you know we're planning to take away your
fundamental democratic right to put up garage, and election signs freely? How
do they win elections, if nobody put up any signs? How will we ever get a
honest deal? Is lying and cheating just endemic with this communist
government? Is anyone making money on all these bad business investments?
Pool the legislature transcripts! Take a day on, call your grand mother,
vote! But just how many "obscured ballots" are there, phone and see. Do you
think in a democracy this information should be open to the public? Do you
own thinking! Why not? Also what's a public voters list good for? Did you
know since '95 votes have been tallied by computer, coded in Texas? Now
carefully in a measured way, ask yourself, just who is foolish enough to be
manipulated by the machine? Having themselves, their family and just about
everyone else punished for it? Send for the facts, over the lines, face the
truth, you're living, alive! Horrors committed before your eyes, n your name,
are you justified? If this is allowed to continue to grow, it can only turn
into something much worse. Slowly, your freedom will further become chained,
and the only thing you'll wish for is that you had taken the time to take
action while you had the chance. Just what are the chances? Unless you think
you don't count? Better by golly, you sure as do so Bobby! Petitions
delicious! Or do nothing, continuing on going backwards, selling yourself
short. You know who you are, it's made up for you, you don't have to go far.
Just don't sit on the sidewalk or leave a ticket unpaid, or beg for justice of
the wounded dying or dead. Blame the weak and disabled, you'll be so strong,
living in your fable. Then when they come for you, you'll say something must
be wrong, but who cares? Your not listening. You'd know if you were being
deceived. 1000 of beer in one small sip, remove all your regulations, they're
just there to keep us in, and privatize always, right.. ya.. that's
thinking. We want to sell Winnipeg Hydro, it's working making a profit. All
we need now are private prisons and the economy will really take off
screaming! The one only reason people commit crimes is cause, they know we
don't have guns. Bombs don't kill people that are killing people! The sky
isn't falling, the sky isn't falling. Something to consider, what's the
cause-like symptom and how do you treat it? Like an infection? As a matter
of truth, it is completely without question, there it is no such thing, as
deception. Now you know the rules, your losses, odds and stakes. What's your
limit? Can you stop? Are you feeling okay buddy? Let us get out of here,
and go to talk.


Sleep Walkers




/ / That is a high act of treason. And it's not,

"oh well, but maybe it's not true.." No, we have
the two documents of question. \ \

What is the Coast to Coast radio network Head talking
about tonight?, the re-re-re-hashing of the "Allaways
Interslinging" Bigfoot phenomenon? Where was I...

Look, you're not going to go to hell for not giving me a
couple of dollars to further my cause, but it sure
couldn't help to leave me without any support here


White House keeps dossiers on more than 10,000 'political enemies'



The United States of America v. Adam Vaughn

He was a stand-up Marine, a beloved cop, and a local hero

/ / Vaughn was accused of possessing child pornography on
the basis of images in his browser cache and downloaded
photos he had deleted from his hard drive long before the
accusations. Although Vaughn says he never sought out or
wanted to keep pornographic images of children, he's
serving four and a half years in jail. \ \



/ / It's as if our government is telling us that if we're
going to look at porn, we'd better pay for it. Otherwise,
we might get branded pedophiles. How many innocent lives
will be destroyed before the child porn wars are over? \ \



/ / Specialist Damien "Monster" Corsetti--known
affectionately as the "King of Torture" among his Bagram
colleagues--was later fined and demoted for forcing an
Iraqi woman to strip during an interrogation at Abu
Ghraib. Yet Corsetti remains a free man. \ \

Will America hunt to kill the un-arrested bushite cancer
that knows thyself as the "King of Torture"? Who's
blasphemous open contempt for all that is God doesn't even
earn him a spot on America's Most Wanted?

/ / "Suggestions that U.S. forces targeted civilians with
these weapons are simply wrong," U.S. Marine Major Tim
Keefe said in an e-mail to Reuters. "Had the producers of
the documentary bothered to ask us for comment, we would
have certainly told them that the premise of the program
was erroneous." \ \

Does not such treasonous conduct warrant a military
misdemeanor of bush bitch Tim Keefe? He even claims to
have knowledge of the undisputable endless footage
that documents nazi attacks against the completely
innocent as defenseless. But the premise of a commitment
for Americans to truly war Our enemies being the truly
Just and Free, at least under his falsehoods of
leadership, is an erroneous argument. For, bushites are
the bad guys, who lie cheat and steal don't you know.


/ / Bush didn't have any popularity left. Overnight tracking
polls showed Kilgore dropped three percentage points after the
President's appearance and Democrat Tim Kaine won on Tuesday.

Conservative Pennsylvania Republican Senator Rick Santorum

told radio talk show host Don Imus Wednesday that he does not
want the President's help and will stay away from a Bush rally
in his state on Friday. \ \




/ / We're getting international police co-operation on this matter. \ \



/ / Why would God promise you in the Bible, go hurt myself
purposefully. And steal something from someone you didn't
earn. And be a dishonest lying bastard, just to be an
asshole you like to be. \ \



/ / He figured anybody who committed the acts of torture
against the innocent, needed to be publicly executed for
America, by America, as America, and I, am totally in
agreement with that. \ \


Bush Jnr. is sure wicked evil song




/ / an epic study that documents the systematic nature of
torture by the Americans, and how casual it is, even
enjoyable. [...] as the head of Reuters said recently,
it is out of control. It is destroying lives in industrial
quantities when compared with the violence of the
resistance. \ \

Godless bushite enemy thieves, are enemies of innocent men
women and children as they live and die in undefended America
measured worthless to the neocon traitor's bottom line.

If YOU, personally make no effort to confront millionaire talk
radio hosts who insist America's more concerned with
discussing the importance of aliens and vampires than the
sacrifice of liberty for tyranny, America will die. Anti-cop
Coast to Coast hosts deliberately forbid Americans to learn
about who personally is responsible for the crimes of 911, or
that the war in Iraq has no rational justification whatsoever.
Nazi bush bitch George Norrie would happily watch your
American children die for the treasonous bushmob, before
allowing any Patriot on Your radio to discuss these serious
matters that confront us all. Help me gain a public voice on
our air waves, please.


/ / Mr Cheney told several Republican senators that
President Bush would veto the annual defense spending
bill if it contained language prohibiting the use of
cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment by any U.S.
personnel. \ \


/ / Col. Robert Bowman: As other speakers have said,
they knew the American people wouldn't stand for it, and
they said so in their documents, and they said, unless
there's that new Pearl Harbor.

[...] and it is treason. [...]

1. We give up all rights to Iraqi oil 2. We give up
all rights to the rebuilding contracts- if Halliburton
wants a contract from you, they have to bid on it like
anybody else, and they have to hire Iraqis to do the work
for a change. 3. We give up all rights to those 14
permanent military bases we're building in Iraq at this
time. And the people in the Whitehouse are not going to
make those committments and so they have to go and all
the puppeteers with them. \ \

/ / Rove told Cooper that further information
discrediting Wilson and his findings would soon be
declassified and ended the phone conversation by saying
"I've already said too much. \ \

/ / • less than one per cent of the population believes
coalition forces are responsible for any improvement in
security; \ \

(Don't miss "Johnny Wizard Vs. the bushmob")

(on bush's behavior during the school book 9/11 incident.)

/ / Stuck he was then, with no mind to ruse, er.. time to
snooze, Arg! What was the cue? Errrch... If he moves
with priority interest as concerned openly honest public
figure, as he knows a legitimate President would have
been to first learn of such carnage,


why not previous before he left his Hotel room with a
television? Outside the Hotel? In the motorcade? With
school staff as you'd figure would have been present too
laughing, no? Instead he stayed as he had been to give
no orders publicly, nor attempt to make public inqiries,
but to listen with such unbelievable absolute devotion,
equating a beautiful child's story, as if it were Jesus
from the heavens himself, speaking directly on the
living Nature of our Universe.. \ \

From the Johnny Wizard work - "Wait a Moment"

[The Son of Man asks:]

/ / Who cares about yourself if you won't listen as reason
to? What can you lose when you have granted to be
blindly stolen from? \ \


/ / An editorial appearing Wednesday in the Washington
Post did not mince words in denouncing Cheney's
intervention. His actions, the newspaper declared,
demonstrated that ``this vice president has become an
open advocate of torture.'' \ \

/ / The War Crimes Act of 1996, a federal statute set
forth at 18 U.S.C. § 2441, makes it a federal crime for
any U.S. national, whether military or civilian, to
violate the Geneva Convention by engaging in murder,
torture, or inhuman treatment. \ \

/ / Making a potential prosecutor's job easier, U.S.
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales wrote a memo in January
2002 to President Bush saying that America should opt out
of the Geneva Convention because top officials have to
worry about prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 2441. By
attempting to sidestep the Geneva Convention, Gonzales
created a document trail that can be used to prove that
top administration officials knowingly created a policy
of torturing prisoners \ \

/ / Entitled ``The Torture Question,'' the report makes
clear that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld bears direct
responsibility for the brutal methods of interrogation
used against US prisoners. \ \



/ / What is happening is that Ms. Davidson and Lawyers Against the
War have laid charges against George Bush Jr; accusing him of
aiding, abetting, and counseling the commission of torture. \ \

/ / "Many Canadians don't realize that we have not only the right
but the responsibility to pursue these charges, it is a
responsibility that the Canadian government owes not only to the
people of Canada, but to the people of the world. \ \

/ / "The American legal system seems incapable of bringing him to
justice and there are no international courts with jurisdiction.
So it's up to Canada to enforce the law that everybody has signed
on to but nobody else seems willing to apply." \ \

/ / Irwin Cotler's credo is supposed to be "Justice, justice shall
you pursue" not ingratiation with superpowers who practice torture. \ \


/ / [...] talk your arguments to 18 USC 794 anti-treason law.
and if he [bush] goes by hanging I buy the rope. \ \


/ / o Where the HELL is YOUR proof that Dick Cheney was NOT
conducting drills on 9/11 that paralyzed Air Force responses to the
real attacks?

o Where the HELL is YOUR proof that Tower 7 collapsed as a result
of the attacks?

o Where the HELL is YOUR proof that `put' orders placed on the two
Airlines involved in the attacks were mere coincidence?

o Where the HELL is YOUR proof that Porter Goss knew nothing about
$100,000 that was wired to Mohammed Atta?

o Where the Hell is YOUR proof that Donald Rumsfeld did not
organize an illegal military group that would ``provoke terrorist
attacks which would then require `"counter-attack" by the United
States? \ \




/ / One soldier raised his concerns within the Army chain of
command for seventeen months before the Army agreed to undertake an
investigation, but only after he had contacted members of Congress
and considered going public with the story. \ \

/ / These soldiers' accounts show how the administration's refusal
to insist on adherence to a lawful, long-recognized, and
well-defined standard of treatment contributed to the torture of
prisoners. They also show how that policy betrayed the soldiers in
the field--sowing confusion in the ranks, exposing them to legal
sanction when abuses occurred, and placing in an impossible
position all those who wished to behave honorably. \ \


/ / The Nazis in the 1930s were forced to waste precious time and
money on the inoculation of the German citizenry, too well-educated
for its own good, against the infections of impermissible thought.
We can count it as a blessing that we don't bear the burden of an
educated citizenry. \ \


From "Epiphany"


/ / What can bush or rumsfeld do now in Iraq, outside of criminally
stealing our assets, that they couldn't do before a single innocent
Iraqi person was murdered by heinous traitor buford blount? Look I
am serious about this: read... What can bush or rumsfeld do now
in Iraq, outside of criminally stealing our assets, that they
couldn't do before a single innocent Iraqi person was murdered by
heinous traitor buford blount? \ \


From below..

/ / Imagine that: Arabic
WorldCom phone bills, Halliburton gas bills, with the
only store "legally" open to US public will be Bechtel,
who will demand through bushite tyranny, you pay your
wages for something unjustly over billed as, but put
together at less than five dollars a day wages offered,
being as the only jobs available through not publicly
accounted bushite middleman directly chancing the whole
country of America as undefended financially., extending
"their" risk to do nothing; by the further needless
dying WORTHLESS WITH as da dumdums. \ \


From "Time to tell"

/ / Again,

quoting from this very document:

"Mr. bush you nazi vermin, you attack my America, you attack US
all. American soldiers will not sit back as cowards entirely, and
watch you sacrifice our lives as worthless without meaning." \ \


ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations

/ / Two veteran FBI investigators say they were
ordered to stop investigations into a suspected terror cell
linked to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept.
11 attacks...

`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'



/ / 5) Was there a coordinated effort with the U.S. intelligence
community and/or British officials to "fix" the intelligence and facts
around the policy as the leaked document states? \ \


/ / CNN reporter David Ensor said (11/2/05), "U.S. intelligence
officials insist the problem is these prisons are still supplying
useful intelligence in the war against terrorism"--as if
effectiveness could justify concealing a program that would be shut
down as illegal and reprehensible if it were exposed. \ \

/ / In fact, as they made clear on page one, the authors had
stripped out Falluja; their estimate of 98,000 deaths would
otherwise have been much higher. \ \

Repeat after me:

Coast to Coast hosts are leaving us listeners out here
with the impression, that neither hosts have
heard of the National Intelligence Estimate,
or the NIE, that was created by pressure through
congress just prior to the war, by the cia, state
department, and eight other American intelligence
agencies, of which, the bush administration got
caught misleading the verdicts by censorship,
and outright re-writing, then bald faced lying.
Subsequently causing the creation of an
investigation by the Senate, who's conclusion stated
that the bush administration "..provided [Americans]
with an incomplete picture of the nature and extent
of the debate within the intelligence community
regarding these issues."

/ / There's a follow up article to the "bush church"
report sent to you last week. ..[Methodist Bishops Repent
Iraq War 'Complicity'] that reported the church Bush and
Cheney belong to had adopted a statement opposing the war
in Iraq.]

Interesting the United Methodist Church felt it necessary
to REPEAT it's statement that the push for war was
"without any justification according to the teachings of
Christ." \ \

/ / Patriotism demands that I speak out and call it by
it's name. It is treason.

I joined the Air Force a long time ago to protect our
borders and our people, not the financial interests of
Folgers, Chiquita-Banana, Exxon and Halliburton. We've
had enough corporate wars. \ \

/ / Countless civilians--including women and
children--were cruelly burned to death (whether
incidentally or in a deliberate attempt to terrorize
scarcely matters) in the most agonizing of ways. Enemy
fighters were killed through the use of weapons that have
been outlawed by the civilized world--a world that America
can not claim to be a part of.

American troops even have a term for the barbaric
technique -- "Shake and Bake"--clear evidence that this
was no one-off affair. \ \

/ / Iraqi detainee, Thahee Sabbar, who has brought a
lawsuit against Rumsfeld and top US military commanders,
said he was also beaten, deprived of food and sleep, given
electric shocks, shot with rubber bullets and subjected to
mock executions after being detained by US soldiers in
July 2003, [...]

"They put me in a small cell at first where there were
bloody clothes from another prisoner. Then I was in a
room with about 100 others. Sometimes they used drills on
people." \ \

/ /  http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/12/02/BU172807.DTL

The roots of the Iraq profiteering scheme are deeply
planted in the back yard of the White House, and as I
demonstrated above, it requires very little effort to
verify the allegation that the fruits of the scheme do not
far from the tree. AFP.

Which brings us back to our president: incurious,
inarticulate and insulated from people and information
that might contradict his "gut feelings" or religious
beliefs. To fulfill the duties of our national chief

executive, intelligence is not enough - Woodrow Wilson
taught us that - but a conspicuous lack of it is fatal. \ \

/ / The more you look, the more you'll find that our
Constitution has been subverted to the point of virtual
irrelevance. The legislative branch has abdicated its
exclusive right to declare war to the president, who was
appointed by a federal court that undermined the states'
constitutional right to manage and settle election
disputes. Individuals' protection against unreasonable

searches have been trashed, habeas corpus is a joke, and
double jeopardy has become routine as those exonerated by
criminal court face second trials in civil court. Our
system of checks and balances has collapsed, the victim of
a citizenry more interested in entertaining distraction
than eternal vigilance.

Where evil men rule, law cannot protect those who sleep. \ \

/ /Hitler would have trouble understanding what the fuss
over using white phosphorus in a city is all about. \ \

/ / Roberts said that the CIA was aware that the vast
majority of detainees are not terrorists, proven by the
fact that Pakistani gangsters admitted to rounding up
innocent people in street sweeps and selling them to the
US government as terrorists for anything up to $25,000.
These people are now at Guantanamo Bay. \ \

/ / However, Hadi al-Amery, who heads the Badr
Organisation, a militia group tightly allied to SCIRI, a
powerful Shiah Muslim political party in government,
denied any link to the bunker. He said: "This bunker is
run by the interior ministry. The Americans are there
every day. If there was torture, we ask for an
investigation." \ \

/ / The tactic used by the Bush regime is to repeat that
the Iraq policy was a resounding success because the
people are now free. Free? To do what? They can't even
go down the road for bread these days without fearing for
their lives. Women can't walk around freely. They aren't
even free to wear what they like. \ \

/ / Bush administration Labor Dept. economist, Dr.
Morgan Reynolds, and Eric Hufschmid, author of "Painful
Questions", spell out clearly the evidence proving 9-11
was done by our government and agents from Israel. \ \

/ / Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican former air force
lawyer who had co-sponsored McCain's bill, promptly caved
in and slipped an amendment into a $445bn military
spending bill that removed the right of US courts to
decide whether the government could hold foreign prisoners
at camps such as Guantanamo. \ \

/ / Describing the United States' intention to target
civilians in Falluja, Englehart states that he was told by
military superiors going into Falluja that "every single
person that was walking, talking, breathing was [an] enemy
combatant. As such every single person that was walking
down the street or in a house was a target." Englehart
confirms that soldiers had orders to shoot children as
young as 10 years old. \ \

/ / Cheney and Rumsfeld, at least, seem determined to
press on regardless and to flout the law. Last Monday the
Pentagon said that its first war crimes trial at
Guantanamo - heard by a "military commission" with the
right to impose the death penalty - would go ahead this
month, despite an announcement by the Supreme Court that
it is to rule on whether the president has the power to
create such tribunals in the first place. For the moment,
all Condoleezza Rice can do is damage limitation. \ \

/ / Woodward's confession suggests that government
insiders were pretty sure that certain reporters might
cooperate with them in an attempt to punish Plame and her
husband, former Amb. Joseph Wilson. Someone in our
government was clearly out to get anyone who threatened
Zionist attempts to get our military, Israel's so-called
"proxy army" into war in Iraq. This person, or persons
may have sought to use Woodward, along with perhaps other
reporters, yet, that certainly does not mean that Libby
didn't lie to the grand jury, or seek to obstruct justice.
It simply means that whereas Woodward wouldn't play along,
he also wouldn't do anything to thwart the plan, like
going to the FBI or someone and saying that there is an
attempt underway to expose a CIA covert operative. \ \

/ / What's even more suspicious is that their son, a
34-year-old Harvard graduate, was never even listed as a
passenger on Flight 11, either on the original manifest or on
the official list provided by American Airlines, even though
every reference to him afterwards on internet memorials or in
newspaper accounts lists him as a Flight 11 passenger. \ \

/ / And that's exactly what transpired in the strange and
unexplainable autopsy investigation of the Flight 77
passengers, conducted essentially in the cover of darkness by
the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP). \ \

/ / "they're not working undercover. They've abandoned all
pretense of morality. They're in our faces -- in every
critical position in this government -- put in place to create
the madness, cruelty, torture, and massive genocide that will
form the foundation of their World. And destroy ours." \ \

/ / By trapping as many as 100,000 [more than 200,000
actually] men and boys in the city before invading it, the
U.S., acting for all the world more like a group of Bosnian
Serb thugs than like the army of the Free World, has assured
that it will be killing many, many civilians, but we won't be
hearing much about that. As far as the Pentagon and Centcom
in Iraq go, the dead in Fallujah are and will be all rebels.
If they die, they must have died fighting. \ \

/ / Wilkerson said, "I can only assume that, when the vice
president of the United States lobbies the Congress on behalf
of cruel and unusual punishment and the need to be able to do
that in order to get information out of potential
terrorists... that it's still going on." \ \

Abramoff "asked for $9 million in 2003 from the president of a
West African nation to arrange a meeting with President Bush
and directed his fees to a Maryland company now under federal
scrutiny, according to newly disclosed documents. \ \

/ / One contractor received more than $100,000 to completely
refurbish an Olympic pool but only polished the pumps. \ \

/ / He [the demon anti-Christ] also said that he will block
White House aides from testifying [...] and that he will not
release official White House photos of himself with former
Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff. \ \



It's the simplest idea. All you gotta do, is get a couple large
buoys, that let's say take maybe a twenty foot square space, maybe
a foot or two thick, and they contain air, made of some strong
plastics. You just take that, anchor it stationary to the ocean
floor, and have it situated on a gear system where, even though the
buoy moves up and down slightly, there is such a tremendous amount
of force on it, through the rising of the tides, that through gear
ratios, you could easily get some turbines going for a thousand
bucks or something. Not a big investment to give you free energy

/ / Do not put any effort into thinking out your own opinions.
Create doubt on anything any true liberator, would try to
convey to you as important for your life. Never mind. Watch
your son or daughter be sacrificed, and just lie to yourself,
and tell us all how your so proud of your dead son or
daughter, "because they were fighting for liberty." And we
just got to just keep bullshiting you because you're an enemy
to God. An enemy to true freedom, when you demand truth not
be spoken for the innocent being persecuted, as Christ was.
Where is Christianity in America? Call your Church now! \ \


/ / Why does any American think that spying without a warrant
has any more effect in reducing the threat of terrorism than
spying with a warrant? \ \

Yet, FOX, CNN and CBC silently plead ignorance when
broadcasting for bushite favor on this rights issue. He wants
to pursue terrorists they'll tell us, but CNN, CBC, FOX and
others, won't tell us why Bush secretly feels FISA would
jeopardize such claimed inquiries? Sure, bushites are dumb,
but we're not that dumb to except this without knowing. It's
similarly like, Bush can't be my Chief because, Congress
didn't declare war like the Constitution Laws. So, what's he
going by then?, right?


Look up in your mind, across the sky!, it's the glorious sign
that says things couldn't be much worse under the watchful
gaze of the Supreme Commander. It's like, Bush can't be my
Chief because, Congress didn't declare war like the
Constitution Laws.

The, in league with evil tresspass of George Walker Bush only
has the rights that are protected by any civilized American.
The lying demon enemy has no power of illusion over me, for
he, I have concluded with in discussions about Satan, is
truly, no honorable god fearing American.

Help me to gain some international say, and our world will
fair brighter at becoming, this fool's play/tragedy.

bLeEplAb! bLeEplAp! bLeEplAb! bLeEplAp!


God or no God, I hate the demon antiChrist, corporate
america's false-deity, Your unelected Mr. bush Jr., as
much as any real Creator of this world, or any other

With such real inaction on old promises [lies] made by
the dishonorable and dishonest leaderless bushite nazi
savages, while desecrating all of Humanity by fighting
against a just rule of Law, (instead of protecting
America's America), forces the continued REAL WORLD
sacrifice of true Liberty, until the bushmob gang is
brought up by US for war crimes., as the 9/11
perpetrating, super evil as ungodly, demon antiChrist in
disguises. (I very much would feel welcomed to play my
part in those public proceedings.) Hmmm.. maybe CNN or
CBC can become publicly convinced we should have our own
news programs on what's truly happening?, to compete
against the 'evil bushites' in this competitive free
market place of ideas? Who knows..

Take care of the business, by getting US in on our
news-casts., as these principles here standing in words,
are a dreamers dreams, just waiting for You to bring to
reality., by standing proud, strong, and forever free as
a, truly, super awesome Human Being.

Johnny Wizard


 link to houston.indymedia.org
 link to radio.indymedia.org


The Benderman Cause

A Canadian Soldier's Life Held in Contempt - The Verdict

LET IT BE KNOWN - Propagandized stupider than the fates will allow

Realize, CNN and CBC have received this post, yet, continue to
lie to dying soldiers.