portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting united states

9.11 investigation | political theory

CIA Resurrects Dead Bin Laden.WHY?

The recent audio tape of Bin Laden threatening America has been confirmed by the CIA as authentic.
The CIA previously authorized a Bin Laden Video, which showed the NUT wearing gold, which we know is forbidden for fundamentalist Muslims. Huffington post has a nice photo.
This article asserts the war on terrorism, is a fabrication, of the Necons and rouge elements of the CIA and FBI directed by the Illumnati.

The key to ending the War on terrorism is proving the real attackers on 911.
CIA RESSURECTS BIN LADEN!
According to Michael Leedeen, Iran news reported him dead..
 http://www.nationalreview.com/ledeen/ledeen200601090808.asp
And, according to Iranians I trust, Osama bin Laden finally departed this world in mid-December. The al Qaeda leader died of kidney failure and was buried in Iran, where he had spent most of his time since the destruction of al Qaeda in Afghanistan. The Iranians who reported this note that this year's message in conjunction with the Muslim Haj came from his number two, Ayman al-Zawahiri, for the first time.

 link to www.huffingtonpost.com
See comments about Illuminati: And CIA
 http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames/allcomments?pid=50064&rpg=3

 http://www.superlaugh.com/1/dayo.htm

Just as before the CIA actor announced attacks so will attacks come,... to ready the DRAFT for Iran.

Oil, and drugs
is what the Illuminati loves...
As Mary said
We'll soon be dead

the elite needs body parts


Lee Harvey Oswald was CIA: Declassified Document Affirms It
From Mr. John McCone, Director CIA to Mr. James J. Rowley,US Chief, Secret Service, dated March 3, 1962 CO-2-34,030
Also on the Not so lone nut:
 http://jfkmurdersolved.com/buy2.htm
click on Posada



No doubt, Brzezinski( theorist behind Rebuilding America's Defences) is a Jesuit coadjutor of Georgetown University as well as another CFR member. The New Pearl Harbor was indeed 911, but a second and more devastating attack is to come, an attack that will be atomic, carried out by the CIA and blamed on its ISI-controlled Al Qaeda Terrorist Network.

Michael Ruppert's Crossing the Rubicon is the finest piece of work on the subject of American Intelligence bringing down the WTC and the missile attack on the Pentagon.
 http://www.frugalfun.com/timeline.html

Like the CIA confirmed an earlier message from Bin Laden...
wearing gold jewelry
Which happens to be against fundamentalists beliefs:
 http://www.superlaugh.com/1/dayo.htm


Northwood's.... Rex

Garden Plot Google above:

Agenda 21

National Guard in Iraq

BROKEN BORDERS WITH MEXICO

THE BIG LIE!  http://www.superlaugh.com/1/da yo.htm [superlaugh.com]

911 is the BIGGEST LIE of the Century!

Who is responsible ?
Rouge factions of the CIA and FBI, under control of the Illuminati like in the movie, the Hostage!




 http://www.nationalreview.com/ledeen/ledeen200601090808.asp

According to Michael Ledeen :And, according to Iranians I trust, Osama bin Laden finally departed this world in mid-December. The al Qaeda leader died of kidney failure and was buried in Iran, where he had spent most of his time since the destruction of al Qaeda in Afghanistan. The Iranians who reported this note that this year's message in conjunction with the Muslim Haj came from his number two, Ayman al-Zawahiri, for the first time.

"TAKE NOTICE ::

No VIDEO of Bin Laden ... JUST AUDIO.

Anybody with a LAPTOP computer and Bin Laden's previous *threats* can mock up a computer generated *Bin Laden* message.

BUSHCO is right on-schedule with their latest *THREAT*.

The timing is to provide emphasis on:

1) Patriot Act Renewal

2) Diversion from Delay Scandal

3) Diversion from Abramoff Scandal

4) Diversion from Plame Scandal

5) Diversion from NSA SPY'g Scandal

6) Diversion from Medicare/Medicaid Scandal

7) Diversion from Iraq Insurgency/War going Badly

8) Diversion from Iraq Turning into Radical Islamic Theocracy

9) Diversion from Alito Confirmation

10) Diversion from the Failed Promises to Rebuild New Orleans and the Gulf Coast

11) Diversion from Bill Frist's SEC investigation

12) Diversion from Voting Irregularities from 2004 and 2000 Election Cycle

... and the list goes on and on.

How convenient we get an AUDIO Threat at this time.

Michael Ledeen's thoughts: html
This article appears in the July 11, 2003 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.
`SYNARCHISM-NAZI/COMMUNISM'
Michael Ledeen Demands
`Regime Change' in Iran
by Scott Thompson
We have already crossed the Rubicon. We are already in Hell. World War III in Eurasia is already ongoing. There was not an Iraq war; there is a continuing Iraq war. There was not an Afghanistan war; there is a continuing Afghanistan war. There's already an onset of a war with Iran, being run covertly, as a covert operation, from the United States, in Iran right now! You see it on the television screens here. That is not a spontaneous student movement. That is a U.S.-run destabilization of Iran, trying to set up the conditions for a war. The situation in Korth Korea; other situations I know of; we are now inside World War III. It is not something that we could prevent from happening. We're there.
—Address by Lyndon LaRouche in Istanbul, Turkey, June 14, 2003

Ledeen's ideas are quoted daily by such figures as Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz. His views virtually define the stark departure from American foreign policy philosophy that characterized United States actions since September 11, 2001.... Now Ledeen is calling for 'regime change' beyond Iraq. In an address titled 'Time to Focus on Iran: The Mother of Modern Terrorism,' for the policy forum of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) on April 30, he declared: "The time for diplomacy is at the end; it is time for a free Iran, a free Syria and free Lebanon."
—William O. Beeman, "Michael Ledeen: Neoconservative Guru," in The Daily Star, Beirut, Lebanon, May 9, 2003

The same drumbeat for "regime change" that led to war against Iraq, is now coming from the mouths of Vice President Dick Cheney's "chicken-hawk" cabal; only now, the target is Iran. This destabilization is being run through U.S. private foundations and think-tanks, to overthrow the government in Iran, and run a destabilization, and/or military strike against Iran's nuclear energy production facilities.

The pointman is Michael Ledeen, who divides his time among National Review Online, JINSA, and the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Ledeen is stirring up the networks in Congress and the press, and lining up tainted intelligence to justify war on Iran.

This is the same Michael Ledeen, who, as a consultant to the Reagan-Bush Administration National Security Council in the mid-1980s, was a pivotal criminal figure in the Iran-Contra fiasco, covertly peddling weapons to the very Ayatollahs whom he is now plotting to overthrow. He is also the same Ledeen who now calls for the United States to wage war against Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Libya because, he alleges, they are all "masters of terror." Yet in the 1980s, Ledeen was one of the biggest promoters in Washington of the so-called Afghansi mujahideen—including Osama bin Laden—whom he touted as "freedom fighters" and "champions of the democratic struggle against totalitarian communism."

Ledeen's operations are not merely the rantings of deeply disturbed wanna-be Il Duce. His efforts should be understood as reflecting the immediate intentions of the Administration neo-conservatives. His cronies, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Doug Feith, are the key advisors to Secretary of Defense Donald "Dr. Strangelove" Rumsfeld.

Ledeen, the self-proclaimed "universal fascist," has long been under scrutiny by EIR researchers, as a man who has been in the midst of some of the dirtiest covert intelligence operations of the past 30 years. EIR's Special Report of April 1987, Project Democracy: The 'Parallel Government' Behind the Iran-Contra Affair, put a spotlight on Ledeen, from which I draw some of the brief profile published here.

Ledeen, as he wrote in his book Machiavelli on Modern Leadership: Why Machiavelli's Iron Rules Are As Timely and Important Today as Five Centuries Ago (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000), is a believer in "total war" through "creative violence." There is no such thing as peace between nations, he maintains; peace is just an interlude between wars.

Ledeen fits the profile of a "Synarchist," or "Nazi/Communist," as those concepts were discussed in World War II-era documents made available to EIR by military intelligence and other sources during the 1980s (see Jeffrey Steinberg, "Synarchism: The Fascist Roots of the Wolfowitz Cabal," EIR, May 30, 2003). Particularly relevant to this characterization is Ledeen's work with both "Red" and "Black" terrorists in Italy, and his support, along with Henry Kissinger, of the Propaganda Due (P-2) Freemasonic Lodge of former Nazi collaborator Licio Gelli, which directed the NATO-related "strategy of tension" against former Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro.

Still Promoting Terrorists
On June 23, France's Secret Service launched a crackdown on the Iranian Mujahadeen e-Khalq (MEK, or MKO), an anti-regime group that has been on the U.S. State Department's list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations since 1997. Simultaneous with recent confrontations in Iran, some 150 MEK members were arrested at their "international headquarters" near Paris, and accused of plotting terrorist attacks against Iranian embassies and diplomats throughout Europe. The MEK members arrested by the French authorities were operating under the cover of the National Council for Resistance in Iran, the MEK's international front group. Among those arrested were MEK cult leader Maryam Rajavi and her husband, MEK military chief Massoud Rajavi. Following the arrests, nine members of the group set themselves on fire in protests in Paris. One died.

Rather than applaud the French moves as part of the war against terrorism, Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) is trying to whip up public support for the group. In an open letter, published in the June 24 Washington Times, he called for the "terrorist" designation to be dropped. He had earlier put forward an amendment to a bill that would give $50 million to exile Iranian satellite TV stations, to continue the sort of psy-ops carried out by Radio Farda. Back on March 13, Senator Brownback had joined Rep. Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) to call for a "regime change," in Iran, despite the fact that moderate reformers, notably President Khatami, have become a significant factor in the country. Brownback's website states: "It may seem that our support is not really that important, but in truth, democracy dissidents inside Iran tell me that it is crucial to motivate the opposition and for them to know that there can be a strong future with the U.S. once they have re-claimed their ancient land."

Brownback was joined in the call to arms in defense of the terrorist MEK, by Michael Ledeen's alter-ego Daniel Pipes, who posted an op-ed on his website, demanding not only that the MEK be removed from the State Department terror list; but that the U.S. government adopt the MEK as a "liberation group" to wage guerrilla insurgency against the Iranian government.

Ledeen joined the fray with a raving article in the June 16 National Review Online, "The Iranian Revolution, 2003," in which he proclaims that he can "sniff out" Iranian revolution from "the tell-tale odors coming from the undergarments of its doomed leaders." The article cites six reasons why the Iranian "revolution" is unstoppable now—and why President Bush must embrace it. The article is considered a signal that the neo-con cabal inside the Administration is going into high gear behind the scenes to get war in Iran. Among other objectives, war on Iran would help derail the Road Map negotiations for Israeli-Palestinian peace—a policy the President supports, but the Administration neo-cons despise.

Ledeen's 'Focus on Iran'
Ledeen and company have been putting this operation in place for some time. In 2001, Ledeen founded the Coalition for Democracy in Iran (CDI), with a call for regime change in that country. One of his partners in founding the coalition was Dr. Rob Sobhani, a professor at Georgetown University and president of Caspian Energy Consulting. Support for the CDI also comes from the Center for Security Policy's Frank Gaffney, former Rep. Jack Kemp, Joshua Muravchik of AEI, and former CIA director James Woolsey, who sits on the Defense Policy Board. Woolsey has also worked for the Doug Feith/Abram Shulsky "Office of Special Plans" in the Pentagon, which cooked the intelligence to push through the Iraq War. One of CDI's policies, as spelled out in the June 15 Washington Post, is to support Brownback's call for an Iran Liberation Act, similar to the 1997 one for Iraq.

Ledeen rails against Iranian terrorism in his recent book The Terror Masters: Why It Happened. Where We Are Now. How We'll Win. According to Pacific News Service of May 19, he gave a speech at a JINSA policy forum on April 30, entitled "Time to Focus on Iran—The Mother of Modern Terrorism."


Ledeen's 'Focus on Iran'
Ledeen and company have been putting this operation in place for some time. In 2001, Ledeen founded the Coalition for Democracy in Iran (CDI), with a call for regime change in that country. One of his partners in founding the coalition was Dr. Rob Sobhani, a professor at Georgetown University and president of Caspian Energy Consulting. Support for the CDI also comes from the Center for Security Policy's Frank Gaffney, former Rep. Jack Kemp, Joshua Muravchik of AEI, and former CIA director James Woolsey, who sits on the Defense Policy Board. Woolsey has also worked for the Doug Feith/Abram Shulsky "Office of Special Plans" in the Pentagon, which cooked the intelligence to push through the Iraq War. One of CDI's policies, as spelled out in the June 15 Washington Post, is to support Brownback's call for an Iran Liberation Act, similar to the 1997 one for Iraq.

Ledeen rails against Iranian terrorism in his recent book The Terror Masters: Why It Happened. Where We Are Now. How We'll Win. According to Pacific News Service of May 19, he gave a speech at a JINSA policy forum on April 30, entitled "Time to Focus on Iran—The Mother of Modern Terrorism."

Bernard Lewis Joins In
The next big push came on May 6, when Ledeen moderated a panel at a conference at AEI, on "The Future of Iran: Mullarchy, Democracy, and the War on Terror."

Co-sponsoring the event was the Hudson Institute—funded by the Russian and Jewish Mafia-linked Marc Rich (whose attorneys had included Cheney's "Scooter" Libby) and by British media baron Conrad Black—and the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. Opening the event was Meyrav Wurmser, director of Middle East programs at the Hudson Institute, whose husband, David Wurmser, is an adviser to Assistant Secretary of State John Bolton. Her morning panel was entitled, "Iran Today—A Reality Check," and panelists included Uri Lubrani of the Israeli Defense Ministry.

Ledeen gave the introduction for former British military intelligence operative and Princeton Professor Emeritus Bernard Lewis, who is the inventor of the idea of a "Clash of Civilizations," later popularized in a book by that name by Samuel Huntington. Lewis' thesis, cloaked in phrases of Athenian democracy, is that which President Carter's National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski formerly called "the Arc of Crisis" and today calls "the Zone of Instability." It calls for stopping Eurasian integration through manipulating tribal, ethnic, and religious axioms to destroy nation-states, beginning especially in the Middle East. Ledeen introduced Lewis as "the reigning genius of Middle East studies everywhere."

Lewis openly called for a "revolution" in Iran, to follow the military conquest of Iraq; he compared Iran to Napoleonic France or Stalin's Soviet Union. Lewis said that the most important and dangerous neighbor of Iraq was Iran, adding, "It is, I suppose, in Iran that this fear of a success of democracy in Iraq is most strongly felt, and with the very best of reasons." Pointing to the fact that there are more Shi'ites than Sunnis among Islamic religious denominations in Iraq, Lewis continued, "Shi'ism is [also] the predominant religion in Iran and the one which ... [is] invoked by the current leadership of that country and the theocracy that was established by the revolution in '79."

Lewis presented the pie-in-the-sky view that "democratic ideas and democratic examples from a new Iraq might spread across the border ... and the Muslim Shi'ite divines on both sides may feel—and one can understand this—they feel they have to do something about it. They have to do something to counter this American-sponsored Democratic fright.... What is necessary from the point of view of the Iranian theocracy is that the democratic experiment in Iraq should fail and that the consequences to Americans there should be so awful that they would go away and not come back."

Also speaking at the AEI event was Senator Brownback, who called for support for his Senate Resolution 82, and promoted his Iran Democracy amendment. "It should be the policy of the U.S.," he said, "to seek a genuine democratic government in Iran that will restore freedom to the Iranian people, abandon terrorism, and live in peace and security with the international commuity."

Everyone who knows the first thing about Iran realizes that any American meddling there—such as the actions already being run through Ledeen, Brownback, Woolsey, et al.—is a recipe for chaos and likely mass deaths. The promotion by Ledeen of a "liberation" of Iran is, thus, a drive for the kind of "purgative violence" that is at the heart of his "universal fascism." Which brings us to Ledeen's variety of fascism.

Ledeen's 'Synarchist' Roots
The first important influence on Ledeen's life was George Mosse, a German Jewish emigré, who had been on good terms with such Nazi leaders as Joseph Goebbels and Herman Goering. Mosse was so close that Goering offered to make his father an Aryan, and the family was permitted to leave Germany 15 minutes before the law was changed.

The Cambridge-educated Mosse, who would become Ledeen's teacher at the University of Wisconsin, taught Ledeen that despite its "perversion" by anti-Semitism, Fascism ought to be scientifically studied, because the Geist (soul) of Western countries had been suffocated and could only be revived through Fascism or Nazism. It is reported that while Ledeen was working on his Ph.D., he was blackballed for having joined—under Mosse's influence—a cell of the Israeli intelligence-linked movement associated with Vladimir Ze'ev Jabotinsky, whom Israeli leader David Ben Gurion referred to as "Vladimir Hitler."

It was through Mosse that Ledeen was introduced to later Presidential Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board member David Abshire, who was the founder of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and who hired Ledeen as a political intelligence operative.

But an even more important mentor to Ledeen was Renzo de Felice, an advocate of the Jacobin Revolution in France which led to the emergence of the first modern Fascist, Napoleon Bonaparte. De Felice did not hide his Fascism, as he wrote in The Illuminati and Revolutionary Mysticism, 1789-1900: "There is something in common between my Jacobins and a certain kind of Fascism.... Fascism wanted to achieve the transformation of society and the individual ... [toward] a new phase in the history of civilization."

After researching in Italy from 1966 to 1967, where he met scions of the Venetian oligarchy who are "magicians" in cultural warfare, Ledeen wrote: Universal Fascism (1972); "Italian Fascism and Youth," Journal of Contemporary History, July 1969; "Fascist Social Policy," in The Use and Abuse of Social Science, ed, Irving Louis Horowitz; and, among others, Fascism, An Informal Introduction to Its Theory and Practice, by Renzo de Felice, which includes an interview with Ledeen.

Ledeen preferred unbridled, Jacobin-style fascism, such as that of Gabrielle D'Annunzio in the early 1900s. In his 1972 Universal Fascism, Ledeen criticized Benito Mussolini as being too rigid: "He never had enough confidence in the Italian people to permit them a genuine participation in Fascism."

Ledeen's Criminal Trail
Ledeen has been associated, throughout the past two decades, with some of the most sordid criminal affairs, implicating government officials, intelligence services, and private "synarchist" networks:

Irangate: It is particularly ironical that Ledeen is today calling for a "regime change" in Iran, since he had been an integral culprit in Project Democracy's covert operations with Iran's regime during the 1980s. He worked closely with Manuchar Ghorbanifar, an Iranian living in France, to whom he had been introduced by top Israeli political intelligence agent David Kimchee. Ledeen brought Ghorbanifar to a meeting on Oct. 8, 1985 with the National Security Council's Lt. Col. Oliver North, at which was also present Israeli arms dealer Ya'acov Nimrodi, a key player in North's "Enterprise." Ledeen had frequent meetings with North in this regard throughout 1985, despite CIA warnings that Ghorbanifar was not to be trusted. It was through Ghorbanifar that 500 TOW missiles were shipped to Iran, and then 19 Hawk SAM missiles, in exchange for the release of American hostages then being held by terrorists in Lebanon. This was the "arms for hostages" deal that was at the heart of the Iran-Contra scandal. The weapons that went to Iran came either directly from the U.S. military stockpiles, or from Israel's massive arms industry, involving top officials of the Israeli government.

Ledeen maintained that he was just involved in a "research program" on Iran, which "by accident," turned into an "action program." However, it is notable that throughout this period, he was involved, by way of a firm called EATSCO, with former CIA Deputy Director for Plans Theodor Shackley, who was another pivotal Iran-Contra figure.


Italy's Propaganda-2 Lodge: According to innumerable sources on both sides of the Atlantic, while working for Kissinger and Alexander Haig at CSIS, Ledeen became a member of the Propaganda Due (P-2) Lodge, which emerged to public light on May 20, 1981. This unmasking occurred just seven days after the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II by Mehmet Ali Agca, in which P-2 was thought to be involved. The exposure of P-2 forced the resignation of 47 Italian Army generals and 6 Navy admirals. Also named was Bruno di Fabio, a naval officer working at NATO headquarters in Brussels, across whose desk passed the reports of the secret services of all of NATO's members. Other prominent Italians revealed to be members of the secret society, who were toppled and were known to be among Ledeen's close associates, were the chief of staff of defense, Giovanni Torrissi; the head of the coordinating body of the secret services, Walter Pelosi; the .....

So you bring up Michael Ledeen's
remarks of A dead BinLaden and Now the CIA ressurects him.!!

This is totally contrived, so the Leaders can say Bin Laden is in Iran, that Iran is protecting him, when the US internal rouge CIA and FBI detonate a nuclear suitcase bomb in the "heart of the country" It won't be New York, that is Illuminati headquarters.

It will probably be Washington, because in every last revolutionary upheaveal, they attacked a nation's capital, Paris, Moscow....

Second guess, Chicago, site of Fitzgerald investigation. They'll claim it was Bin Laden who they'll say is hiding in Iran.

Draft passed. Martial law for most of country.

see  http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/
January 20, 2006 -- What's not right about the Osama Bin Laden audio tape. One thing that the Bush administration does well is manage perceptions of the public. Amid protests over the NSA wiretapping, the extension of the Patriot Act, and the nomination of neo-Fascist Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court, an audio tape on Osama Bin Laden is sent to Al Jazzera. On the tape, Bin Laden suddenly veers from being a traditional right-wing Wahhabi fanatic to the right of the House of Saud to a leftist progressive. The tape by Bin Laden was quickly verified as "authentic" by a CIA that is now firmly in the grasp of neo-cons under Porter Goss.

However, the tape is an obvious fake being used by the Bush administration to scare Americans into believing "Al Qaeda" is making plans for another attack and an attempt to link Bin Laden to Democrats.

The reason the tape is as phony as Niger yellowcake documents and Saddam's weapons of mass destruction is as plain as day. Bin Laden quotes from the introduction of a book written by long-time Washington, DC progressive author and journalist and a friend of mine, Bill Blum. Bill was once an editor and contributor to Covert Action Quarterly, a magazine devoted to exposing CIA operations like the arming, funding, and training of Bin Laden and his mujaheddin guerrillas during the Afghan-Soviet war.

The Bush perception managers are either incredibly stupid or are trying to ensnare liberal journalists as aiders and abettors of Al Qaeda, something that is certainly within their scope. Bin Laden quotes the following passage from Blum's book, Rogue State: "If you (Americans) are sincere in your desire for peace and security, we have answered you. And if Bush decides to carry on with his lies and oppression, then it would be useful for you to read the book Rogue State, which states in its introduction: 'If I were president, I would stop the attacks on the United States: First I would give an apology to all the widows and orphans and those who were tortured. Then I would announce that American interference in the nations of the world has ended once and for all.'" more there...

So, we're now supposed to believe that Bin Laden has come around to plug the book written by an author who demonstrated that the Soviet cause in Afghanistan was for self-defense and in furtherance of the well-being of the Afghan people and that Bin Laden's and his mujaheddin compatriots' cause was anti-progressive and destabilizing to the central Asian region? This would be laughable if it were not for the fact that the neo-cons are once again using the Big Lie to further their ambitions of global domination and worldwide fascism. The 911 attacks are beginning to look more and more like the Reichstag Fire, both engineered to bring about fascist control.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 20, 2006 -- According to State Department sources, the United States has laid down an ultimatum to Iran. However, this ultimatum has nothing to do with Iran's nuclear program. Former U.S. ambassador to Turkmenistan Steven R. Mann, who is also the State Department's Special Negotiator for Eurasian Conflicts and Senior Adviser on Caspian Basin Energy Diplomacy, recently warned Iran against building a pipeline to India. Mann, who was involved in successful negotiations on the building of the CentGas pipeline from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan and the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, travels around central and south Asia helping to negotiate favorable pipeline and drilling deals for U.S. oil and natural gas companies. However, when it comes to U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Mann strongly denies that they are being fought for oil and gas. That contention is usually met with stifled laughter from attendees at seminars and meetings in Washington and Asia.

This is in addition to the Iranian threat of coverting the Illuminati money system to euros,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
See comments in the Nation, at Corn's blog

Also see www Arctic beacons four part articles on Illuminati in America.

Remember the 5 dancing Israelis later found to be Mossad, celebrating and filming the Twin Towers destruction, posing as Arabs? They were found to have large sums of cash, traces of explosives in their Urban Moving Systems Van. They failed lie detector tests, yet the were only Deported, with the help of Michael Chertoff. Wayne Madsen reported on his website, Dominick Sutter, whose business had traces of explosives, and anthrax, same business Judge Alito was easy on, IS BACK!

PREVIOUS ARTICLES
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/01/331836.shtml
Was WTC 7 an act of ARSON and an act of Government Terrorism?
 http://nyc.indymedia.org/en/2006/01/63242.html
January 13, 2006 03:51AM EST [general.addtranslation] Download Article (PDF) [ insert language bar ]
Was 47 story high, WTC 7's collapse, not hit by any airliner, an act of Arson and Government terrorism?

 http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/2005/08/247435.shtml
Who has the elite allied themselves with?

Comment on dates and perceptions 21.Jan.2006 18:34

rese

If the reported date of the tape is correct, sometime in November,

the statement by Ledeen sometime in December.

the perception by the USA TV Watching public,

Bin laden is alive.... and to be feared.

is exactly what BUSCHco wants you to think,

and forget about all the above real scandals,

and elect your same rubber stampers back to the next Congress,

so the CFR plan to make the North American Continent

CAFTA one big happy family,

And NAFTA,
one step closer to the one world, New World Order,
under the elite's control.

If Iran keeps bucking the Illuminiati's control

watch out for the CIA rouge attack in America

to start a draft,

and martial law,

bringing in foreign UN troops because the National Guard isn't here to police you,

and say goodbye to Constitutional Rule,

and hello to the New World Order!

Israeli Dominick Sutter is back in Florida 21.Jan.2006 18:40

rese

This same business, Urban Moving Systems was led by Dominick Sutter.

Below are some comment at the Nation, regarding Alito and the real perpetuators of 911:


 http://www.arcticbeacon.com/3-nov-2005.html

Remeber the 5 dancing Israelis moving van company?

Dirt Starting to Fly Around Alito's Supreme Court Nomination Saying He Is A "Mafia Friendly Insider"
Former Italian government informant talks about Alito's shady past, including dishing out favors to known underworld figures.
3 Nov 2005

By Greg Szymanski



The dirt is starting to fly around the Supreme Court nomination of federal court judge Samuel Alito, Jr., called by some a "mafia friendly insider" who takes a liking to shady, smoke-filled backroom dealings with thugs in the New York Gotti crime family and other New Jersey mobsters.



Alito, 55, familiar with the underworld's influence in New Jersey politics as well its racketeering and bribery operations in other states like Illinois and Pennsylvania, has been linked to "going easy, turning the other cheek and knowingly turning loose" crime family thugs when he served as a U.S. Attorney in New Jersey, primarily handling organized crime cases.



One former FBI/CIA undercover informant, living in Italy and who will remain anonymous, came forward this week, saying talk on the street when he was on the East Coast during Alito's tenure as a supposed crime-busting U.S. Attorney was that he was "tight and friendly, dishing out legal favors to known crime members."



Although certain FBI reports since have internally cleared Alito of any mischief or wrongdoing, critics including the former Italian informant, claim "official investigations" don't tell the real story behind Alito's backroom legal antics.



"He was close to everything and a lot of connected people walked when he was a U.S. Attorney," said the informant from an undisclosed location in Italy. "He knows how to play the game and he plays it well. Getting the truth is going to be tuff. Alito has a lot of friends, the kind of guys who don't talk."



Further reports have also surfaced from the U.S., Italy and elsewhere that Alito is a key member of a renegade but influential worldwide group called "Propaganda-Due" or P-2, well-known overseas for orchestrating assassinations of key figures in order to advance its jaded notion of world supremacy.



The shady activities of P-2 has for decades been on the front pages of Italian newspapers, linking its members to numerous Vatican finance scandals and assassinations as far back as the murder of former Italian leader Aldo Moro.



And now stories are beginning to surface that Alito is a part of P-2, a group that considers itself above the law, consisting of influential politicians, bankers and businessmen from countries like the U.S., Italy, Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.



In light of his conservative legal record as a federal judge in the 3rd Circuit which has appeased the right wing closet neo-cons, many critics consider it "small potatoes" if not irrelevant since Alito appears to "fit in quite well" with the fascist-minded Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia, as well as the other four high-court justices who illegally installed George W. Bush as President in 2000, in a ruling considered by certain judicial watchdog groups investigating the installment of Bush as "fraught with corruption, bribery and illegal judicial profiteering."



With the emotionally charged issues of abortion and other social concerns about to take center stage in the Alito nomination hearings, watchdog judicial groups are now starting to demand Senators delve deeply into Alito's past ties with organized crime as well as his underhanded dealings with politicians like New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), both interconnected with corrupt financial affairs involving the New York and New Jersey underworld.



Another interesting aspect of Alito's past, showing the "good old boy's club" at work in the Bush administration, is his relationship with the corrupt and unscrupulous Michael Chertoff, the head of Homeland Security.



Chertoff, who took over administering what has been termed by many Americans as a "Gestapo-like" homeland surveillance agency after 9/11, served as Alito's First Assistant in the New Jersey's U.S. Attorney's office where together they supposedly arranged cover-ups, benefiting financially from many shady dealings with the underworld, as well as Israeli fronted companies dealing in the illegal arms trade sanctioned by the Mossad and the CIA.



According to a report released by a judge-busting investigator privy to inside information, Chertoff and Alito's association was far more about breaking the law than upholding to the principles of justice, an oath Alito again must take "with perhaps his fingers crossed" if and when he is added to the Supreme Court.



Citing specifics and circulated on various internet outlets including www.cloakanddagger.de, the shady report on Chertoff and Alito alleged:



"They jointly arranged apparently to cover up and personally financially benefit from numerous crimes committed by renegade groups of officials and agents of Israeli Intelligence, The Mossad, operating front companies for various scams.



"These criminal gangs arranged rackets skimming off vast sums from runaway corruption among Judges and other court officials in the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Also Alito and Chertoff reputedly profitably engaged in clandestine and corrupt weapons deals with supposedly Israeli weapons and defense contractors located in New Jersey. In favor of Gestapo tactics, Chertoff after 9-11 became head of Homeland Security.



"Alito, with the help of Chertoff, likewise reportedly covered up various rackets perpetrated by Israeli gangsters more or less resident in New Jersey, victimizing suckers; quoting them lowball figures for furniture moving and then at the destination demanding a huge price which if not paid, the Israeli criminals would threaten to empty the contents of the moving vans into the Hudson River."



The choice of Alito comes four days after Bush's first appointee, his personal friend and lawyer, Harriet Miers, resigned because of legal incompetence. Alito, originally appointed to the federal bench in 1990 by Daddy Bush is seen as a strong conservative voice nicknamed "Scalito" for his philosophical similarities with Justice Scalia, also called my many of his critics the "Go To Hell Judge" for his insensitive and underhanded rulings.



Regarding abortion, Alito is most definitely opposed to it, backing a Pennsylvania law as a federal judge in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, that required women to inform their husbands before they sought an abortion.



It was reported by Wayne Madsen that Dominick Sutter,the Israeli in charge of the Urban Moving Van Co.,(Dancing Israelis' boss) whose busness was found to have included traces of anthrax and explosives, is back in Florida even though he was on a list, because they found traces of explosives and anthrax at his business.
The same supposed business reported above, that Alito was soft on.
Can this be? Judge Alito helped protect certain Mafia figures? Those connected to the 911 story?

 http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/conspiracy_theory/fullstory.asp?id=287

Ronald you said:
Rese: That was when he worked with them at the Conservative Alumni Princeton group, a hive of Zionists and bagmen.

"WASHINGTON -- Samuel Alito '72 fought off frequently exacting questions in his Wednesday confirmation hearings for the Supreme Court, but had little to combat other than monotony yesterday as the hearings wound down and drew him closer to widely expected committee approval.

Alito forcefully distanced himself Wednesday from any connection to the conservative group called Concerned Alumni of Princeton (CAP), an organization whose stances on coeducation and affirmative action had up to that point dogged his confirmation hearings for a seat on the Supreme Court.

"I disavow them. I deplore them. They represent things that I have always stood against and I can't express too strongly," Alito said in response to senators' questions during the third day of his confirmation hearings.

He also suggested that he put the group on his 1985 application to Ronald Reagan's Justice Department to establish his conservative credentials. "You have to look at the question that I was responding to and the form that I was filling out," he said. "I was applying for a position in the Reagan administration. And my answers were truthful statements, but what I was trying to outline were the things that were relevant to obtaining a political position.""
 http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2006/01/13/news/14235.shtml

He used to work in school with Chertoff, gay schools mind you. They did terrible things to Alito there, and now Alito has come back out.

He is totally against the Zionists one hundred percent. He despises them, if you read his testimony. He hates remembering the rape, or constant struggles that went on.

And he is back in the pope's hands now. He will totally oppose the entire agenda and crack down on the spies and others completely. He was in on the inside. And Cardinial Ratzinger, who is so pissed he is purging the Catholics of every Zionist Khazar knows it

Ronald:

The above story in the Arctic Beacon is talking about Alito's activities as a judge: not as a member of CAP.

The Jesuits created the Protocols,

The Jesuits are a militaristic organization.

The higher ups sided with Hitler and the Communists.

Klovenbach, the Black pope, runs the show.
They are the powers behind it.They've got Miafia money, Hitler's gold, the drug trade, the Illuminati in their pocket.

So if you're saying you support Alito because he's in the Pope's hands,

that's scarey.

The Jesuits are sworn to bring about the one world government... and they helped the Holacausr, Mein Kampf was written by a Jesuit priest,


EVIL IN VERY HIGH PLACES!

Rese:

You don't get it.

Cardinal Ratzinger is through with the Jesuits. All of the Jesuits are Khazar Jews, or Turks.

He's purging them out of his catholic church, he was there, he KNOWS who they are.

He's getting rid of every homosexual so called self styled jew in droves.

He is putting Alito on the high court, because he knows the purge must begin!!!

Ratzinger is not Pope John Paul II who was the black pope....Ratzinger is a rabid german catholic, who wants them all disbanded.

Ronald

Rese: Cardinal Ratzinger IS THE POPE now.

Back when I messed things up, and I created these neocons by befriending Lewis Libby...Creating the American Enterprise Institute, and sadly the Conservative Alumni Princeton and so on....I forgot to mention what happened with the pope.

I made a deal with the pope, who had been commanded by the jesuits to back up the neocons.

Later, they realized the Zionist neocons were all satanic. The talmud was satanic. The pope ordered the Talmud destroyed.

Pope John Paul II brought it back...and gradually died. Now Pope Ratzinger, who is above the Black Pope, is here to remove every single disgusting Talmud Pharisee from the doctrine for good.

He is the law.
............................................................................................
Ronald
Ronald, do you mean by" I made a deal with the Pope" that the I you are referring to is Ronald Reagan??Ronald, how can you claim "All of the Jesuits are Khazar Jews, or Turks" "Now Pope Ratzinger, who is above the Black Pope, is here to remove every single disgusting Talmud Pharisee from the doctrine for good."

"He is the law." Did you mean remove them from the Order??? Do you mean disband the order???? Several countries did in history, remove them from their countries, that's when the came to America. They set up big universities, teaching their doctrines, and now Many follow their teachings, like Bill Clinton who asked what do you mean by" is." Maybe while alive then it is is, but when dead is isn't.
.........................................................................................................................................

No pope has succeeded in getting rid of the Jesuits, they've all been murdered by them!

The Jesuit Superior General, Klovenbach runs the Vatican!!!!

What about recent stories of Ratzinger donning a black priest outfit to return to his prior residence?
What about the Lou Dobbs interview with a Jesuit priest showing the Vatican is helping illegeal immigrants into the porus border. He ended his interview saying it has allways been the policy of the Catholic Church to be active in the politics of nations.!!
The Vatican is not only a religion it's a country!
Why aren't they inviting the South and Central illegals into the Vatican?

Who is coming over the broken borders? If there is a war on terrorism, then why allow it?


They are just as powerful a lobby, if not more than the Israelis.

The Jesuits hate the Bill of Rights because, they don't beleive in democracy. They believe in dictatorship of God:=

the Incarnation they believe is in the Pope, who they believe will rule the world.


Christians believe the Holy spirit is in them, the Spirit of Jesus Christ, who did no wrong, and Jesus is Lord. We believe in the brotherhood of man, as disciples of Christ, sharing in all good things. That was part of the Mayflower compact. Christians believe in the Fatherhood of God! " Our Father which art in Heaven, Hallowed be Thy name...for ever and ever." This Jesus taught us to say.



The Catholic Church banned the Bible for centuries while never banning Mein Kampf!

All men are created equal with life, liberty , the pursuit of happiness !

freedom of the press, freedom of religion.!

The Jesuits are working from within, via Masons, secret societies, Skull and Bones to destroy America.

Instead they want the Illuminati, the rich familes of the world to rule the world.

www.vaticanassassins.org/


Read up on Klovenbach. The Catholic Church under black popes is as fascist organization as any can be.

The Jesuit oath is taken to kill off nonbelievers.
Ratzinger worked for a while destroying tanks for the Nazis, before he left.

Now he's God????

............................................................................................................................................
Rese: Klovenbach doesn't control the catholic church.

Wake up. Ratzinger controls it. Yes the jesuits are bad. That's why he's GETTING RID OF THEM in droves.

Read between the lines. All of the jesuits are talmud worshipping yiddish turks.

All of them are Ratzingers worst enemy. He's deleting them from the whole damn place! Read the news. He condemns the Israelis, and any and ALL religions engaged in terrorism!

He said the wrath of god will be upon any, especially they (Talmud) and he will do his job. So let him do his job, and forget about it.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Ronald, you know the Illumninati made Israel a reality,
and they are the working for the CIA and the Illuminati
See story
 http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/2006/01/251112.shtml

CIA Ressurects dead Bin Laden! Why?

Ronald:
The Jesuits created the Protocols,

The Jesuits are a militaristic organization.

The higher ups sided with Hitler and the Communists.

Klovenbach, the Black pope, runs the show.
They are the powers behind it.They've got Miafia money, Hitler's gold, the drug trade, the Illuminati in their pocket.

So if you're saying you support Alito because he's in the Pope's hands,

that's scarey.

The Jesuits are sworn to bring about the one world government... and they helped the Holacaust, Mein Kampf was written by a Jesuit priest,


EVIL IN VERY HIGH PLACES!
..............................................................................................................................................................................
Rese: And for gods sake!
The holocaust itself was a damn hoax, do you know yet? The holocaust was a setup by Talmud Pharisees who killed Jews and Russians all over the place in freaking droves.

That is the truth, the hidden debate that Iran is bringing to the public now. Ratzinger was there in the Nazis!

He hated what the Zionists/Jesuits did to the entire country, he despised them so bad that he ordered the church to disband. The pope was corrupt, and so he took in the Zionists.

All this time Ratzinger has never forgave them for what happened in Germany. You think he's pissed? You have seen nothing yet. He's out for the Talmud worshippers faces, and all of their banking families in Europe, and Khazaria.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Ronald,
the Holacaust was an extension of the JESUIT Inquisition, led by Loyala which chased the Arabs and Jews from Spain, and killed off most of the natives of the New World. Ratzinger helped the Nazis blown up tanks.
.................................................................................................................................................................................................
Ronald, I've been searching for your response looking to find evidence of your saying the Pope is against the Jesuits, and he's trying to reform the order. Can you tell me where that is? The following is what I've found.


 http://www.lyndalou.btinternet.co.uk/vatican.html

I thought I would take a break and mention that Joseph Ratzinger was ordained to the priesthood in 1951. The Cardinal who ordained him was the Archbishop of Munich, Michael von Faulhaber---the most powerful Roman Senator in Bavaria. He is the man who, with his Jesuits at St. Michael's Church about a block away, brought Hitler to power.

And the Canon who was also a Dominican priest working for the Archbishop was Wilhelm August Patin. Patin was Himmler's cousin and an officer in the SS.

The Bavarian Ratzinger, ordained by Hitlerian Faulhaber is now the boss of Archbishop Egan of New York. And Egan is the boss of George W. Bush. Need I say more? from eric von phelps
Secr
Ratzinger and Pedophilia in the Church

Daily Kos | April 21, 2005

Although discussion has raged since this afternoon regarding Benedict XVI and his past Nazi affiliations, I find his present to be slightly more worrisome. As Tim Boucher points out in this blog entry:

Ratzinger is also the author of a May 2001 letter to bishops stating that the "Crimine solicitationies" law (regarding strict secrecy in sex abuse cases) is still in effect.

The law to which Ratzinger's letter referred was issued by Pope John XXIII 40 years ago (a link to the PDF of the document can be found in Boucher's entry). The law itself is chilling, as it describes a mandatory condition of secrecy for both the perpetrators and victims of sexual abuse by Catholic priests.

The 69-page Latin document bearing the seal of Pope John XXIII was sent to every bishop in the world. The instructions outline a policy of 'strictest' secrecy in dealing with allegations of sexual abuse and threatens those who speak out with excommunication.

They also call for the victim to take an oath of secrecy at the time of making a complaint to Church officials. It states that the instructions are to `be diligently stored in the secret archives of the Curia [Vatican] as strictly confidential. Nor is it to be published nor added to with any commentaries.'

[...] Bishops are instructed to pursue these cases `in the most secretive way... restrained by a perpetual silence... and everyone... is to observe the strictest secret which is commonly regarded as a secret of the Holy Office... under the penalty of excommunication'.

Lawyers point to a letter the Vatican sent to bishops in May 2001 clearly stating the 1962 instruction was in force until then. The letter is signed by Cardinal Ratzinger, the most powerful man in Rome beside the Pope and who heads the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith - the office which ran the Inquisition in the Middle Ages.

We can believe what we wish about Benedict XVI's youthful nationalism or lack thereof. What we do know from his letter is that as recently as 2001, he supported and encouraged the drawing of a curtain of secrecy over widespread sexual abuse by clergy. A friend forwarded this link to me today.

The accusers say Vatican-based Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who heads the Vatican office to safeguard the faith and the morals of the church, quietly made the lawsuit go away and shelved it. There was no investigation and the accusers weren't asked a single question or asked for a statement. He was appointed by the pope to investigate the entire sex abuse scandal in the church in recent days. But when approached by ABCNEWS in Rome last week with questions of allegations against Maciel, Ratzinger became visibly upset and actually slapped this reporter's hand. "Come to me when the moment is given," Ratzinger told ABCNEWS, "not yet." "Cardinal Ratzinger is sheltering Maciel, protecting him," said Berry, who expressed concerns that no response was being given to the allegations against the man charged with sex abuse. "These men knelt and kissed the ring of Cardinal Ratzinger when they filed the case in Rome. And a year-and-a-half later, he takes those accusations and aborts them, just stuffs them."



 http://unslaver.com/chadashot/index.php?itemid=39

>  http://14.freebb.com/viewtopic.php?p=1491&freebb=unhivedmind#1491

> Last night I searched the Jesuit's Georgetown University and read a brief
> biography of the President of the military fortress- Dr.John J. DeGioia
> PhD
> You will see that DeGioia is a member of the U.S. National Commission for
> UNESCO, Chair of its Education Committee, according to the webpage he
> "represents Georgetown" being a member of the World Economic Forum and the
> Council on Foreign Relations. Not only that but he is a "member of the
> Order of Malta"- he is a Knight of Malta. The biography says DeGioia is
> the first "lay" president of Georgetown University but the Jesuits who
> trained him (he is a Georgetown alumnus) made sure to choose a man
> associated with the United Nations, Jesuit-trained and controlled Edward
> Cardinal Egan's CFR, and the SMOM. Not surprisingly the Order chose a
> Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor to preside over "Rome on the Potomac."
> Here is a picture of the seal of Georgetown University
>

The eagle is symbolizing the Order's control of the human governments of the globe, and its control of the Papacy symbolized by the cross.

> Notice the eagle fashioned after the Masonic phoenix and double-headed
> eagle holding a globe held by caliphers-(looks like the Masonic compass to
> me)
> Traitor and former CIA director Jesuit-trained Knight of Malta George J.
> Tenet has been rewarded for his complicity in the Black Pope's attack on
> America using his International Intelligence Community with a
> professorship at the School of Foreign Service
>
> A considerable number of the full-time faculty at the Jesuit's School of
> Foreign Service are associated with the United Nations and the Council on
> Foreign Relations in some way.

Correct.

Dennis L. McNamara S.J. is a professor at
> the Georgetown SFS and a member of the CFR. John P. Langan is a Jesuit and
> he was a consultant to the Chemical Bank in New York

Chemical is the bank where Knight of Malta J. Peter Grace's W. R. Grace Inc does all its business.


(Chase) Francis X.
> Winters is a professor as well and has been a member of the CFR since 1986
> too. Donald McHenry is a SFS professor, American ambassador, a CFR member
> and a director of many companies such as International Paper Company, the
> Coca-Cola Company, the Fleet National Bank and its holding company Fleet
> Boston Financial Corporation (which was bought by the Jesuit's Bank of
> America) Glaxo SmithKline p.l.c., and AT&T. He is on the Board of
> Directors of a number of non-governmental organizations, including the
> Institute for International Education, Institute for International
> Economics, the American Ditchley Foundation, and the U.S. Committee for
> United Nations Population Fund. He is a member of the Board of Governors
> of the United Nations Association of the United States of America, and he
> is an Editorial Board member of Foreign Policy Magazine. He is also a
> Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. There are other
> faculty members who are on the CFR.

The Jesuit Georgetown University/CFR connection is imperative to understand if we are to comprehend the Order's control of the governments of the earth. If the Order controls the CFR, then it controls the CIA. The CIA controls the Order's International Intelligence Community which in turn controls the Islamic Masonic International Terrorist Network. Thus, when America is attacked with a series of nuclear detonations in the future, it will be blamed on the Moslems and possibly North Korea. The coming terrorism in the US will be masterminded by the Order via its CIA.
 http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?jesuit

 http://14.freebb.com/viewtopic.php?t=1812&freebb=unhivedmind

'Historian' claims 9-11 plot by Vatican, U.S.
Egyptian tells Saudi TV of 'assignment' by World Council of Churches

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: June 11, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
An Egyptian historian claimed on Saudi television that the United States helped carry out a Vatican plot to destroy Islam by orchestrating the 9-11 attacks -- on "assignment" by the World Council of Churches.

Professor Zaynab Abd Al-Aziz told Saudi Iqra TV in a May 26 interview that the decision to impose one religion over the entire world was made in the Second Vatican Council in 1965," according to the Middle East Media Research Institute, which posted a clip of the program.


Abd Al-Aziz claimed the Vatican's decision to "Christianize the world" included a plan, first, to "absolve the Jews of the blood of Christ."

That was the basis for recognizing Israel, the professor said.

Then the Vatican decided to "eradicate the left" in the 1980s, followed by a decision to "eradicate Islam, so that the world would be "Christianized by the third millennium."

Abd Al-Aziz explained that since Pope John Paul II's plan to Christianize the world by 2000 was not accomplished, "the World Council of Churches assigned this mission to the U.S. in January 2001, since the U.S. is the world's unrivaled military power."

The mission, he claimed, was for the U.S. to "fabricate the show" of Sept. 11, 2001.

The host of the Saudi TV program asked: "You mean to say that the World Council of Churches delegated the mission of Christianizing of the world to the U.S.?"

Abd Al-Aziz replied: "Yes. And how could the U.S. win legitimacy for this without anyone saying that they are perpetrating massacres and waging a Crusader war? It fabricated the 9-11 show. I call it a fabrication because much has been written on this. We are also to blame. Why do we accept a single perspective? Countless books were written, some of which were even translated into Arabic, like Thierry Meyssan's '9/11 - The Appalling Fraud' and 'Pentagate.' 'Pentagate' like Watergate. ... He brings documents to prove that the method used in destroying the three towers was "controlled demolition."


For example, Abd Al-Aziz said, "4,000 Jews caught influenza on that exact day. They set a timer, and all 4,000 ... ."

The host interrupted: "By God, you crack me up! They all set a timer and got influenza on the same day. So the building was completely empty of Jews."

Abd Al-Aziz: "Much has been written about this. One hundred fifty congressmen demanded an inquiry."


 http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/introduction.htm

CIA Publishes Its Own "Assassin's Manual," Proving It Condones Killing Those Who Oppose U.S. Policy
The CIA 'Killer's Manual' was kept out of the public eye for years, but now we know it teaches the 'fine art' of assassination as if it was a mandatory


 http://www.bank-of-wisdom.com/cddisplay.php?cd=cd12



 http://www.vaticanassassins.org/

.....................................................................................................................................................................................

Rese: There is many articles about the new Pope that show his real face, and here is one of them.

"To this end, Cardinal Ratzinger distinguishes between homosexual tendency and behavior: "Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less strong tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil; and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder" (n. 3). Cardinal Ratzinger says that the act is intrinsically evil and that the inclination is objectively disordered without being a sin properly speaking. This is in accordance with Catholic doctrine. The Cardinal also states: "Homosexual activity is not a complementary union, able to transmit life; and so it thwarts the call to a life of that form of self-giving which the Gospel says is the essence of Christian living. This does not mean that homosexual persons are not often generous and giving of themselves; but when they engage in homosexual activity they confirm within themselves a disordered sexual inclination which is essentially self-indulgent" (n. 7)."
 http://www.tanbooks.com/doct/church_sodomy.htm

Pope Ratzinger condemns sodomy period, of any kind. If Jewish people or Talmud worshipping pharisees want to do this bullshit, they can do it outside the catholic church and be punished by god!

All khazars, ALL khazar jesuits who have engaged in it are being thrown out. Ratzinger also will not put up with another day, worshipping ceremonies that do not reflect the catholic religion.

For those who hate catholics, remember Patrick Fitzgerald is a roman catholic....And he hates these demons as much as the Pope, Alito, and many others.

They are on a holy crusade Rese and that means the end of Jesuit pharisees.

Ronald
Posted by: RonaldReagan on January 21, 2006 at 05:

......................................................................................................................................................

Ronald:

Where are the stories that Ratzinger is DISBANDING THE JESUIT ORDER.???? On homosexuality, I agree that a person forefits a marvellous future if they simply have sex with the same sex. Yet a homosexual associate worker told me that the Hassidic Jews at the brisk use their mouths to clense the blood. He said many babies were infected with herpes this way.



...................

If you trust Alito, you are putting yourself in the hands of someone who has never been trustworthy in the past.....although you are also putting yourself in the hands of the christian world, who hates these god awful slimes and denounces them at every session. And wants to rid them from the world...so if you trust Alito, perhaps just perhaps...you trust in the wrath of God upon the Pharisees.

Ronald

Posted by: RonaldReagan on January 21, 2006 at 06:59pm

Yes, Scalia Plus Alito = Vatican Rules the world.

Posted by: EZ on January 21, 2006 at 07:15pm



AGAIN , RONALD,



ALTHOUGH WE AGREE ON THE iLLUMINATI,

WHERE ARE THE STORIES THAT RATZINGER IS DISBANDING THE JESUITS????

Vatican/State or Not? 21.Jan.2006 21:32

rese


Vatican: High Moral Values? Disbanding Jesuits? 21.Jan.2006 21:42

rese

]

Rese, please do not post long posts. Here is your answer.

"The fun day, which would have involved the kids dressing up as witches and wizards has now been cancelled, leaving the pupils sad and confused. The complaint originated apparently from a couple of parents who had become aware that Pope Benedict, when he was a mere Ratzinger, had said of Rowling's novels that they contained "...subtle seductions, which act unnoticed and by this deeply distort Christianity in the soul". It would appear that Ratzinger, like 80, has not read any of the books, but was responding to Gabriele Kuby, a Bavarian-based Roman Catholic sociologist who had sent him a book of hers criticizing the Potter tales. Why he considered it wise or appropriate to offer an opinion on something he hadn't even read is not known, although he is in good company - there is no reason to believe the Ayotollah Khomeini had read The Satanic Verses before issuing Salman Rushdie's death warrant. It is a great shame that the headteacher felt that he had to cancel a day of "magical maths" and "spell invention" in order to placate some superstitious fools. He wrote in a letter to parents, "May I reassure parents that my staff and I only wished to raise the profile of reading and to have a bit of fun at the end of a very successful year." It is a pity he did not find out what the majority of parents felt about the Potter books before calling things off. As it is, the whiny irrational minority have had their way. 80 has, as stated above, not read any of the Potter books but took it upon himself to talk to friends young and old who have. It would appear from their answers that the ethos of Rowling's stories is one of honesty, kindness, loyalty to your friends and a strong feeling that evil is to be confronted and defeated."

 http://www.eighty.btinternet.co.uk/page89.htm

Pope Ratzinger is disbanding the Jesuits and has a strict code that expels all of them.

Ronald
Posted by: RonaldReagan on January 21, 2006 at 11:14pm
Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it]



RR and Rese, I have heard that the Koran was introduced by a Jesuit from Jerusalem Church.

Mohammed was a illiterate and a bedouin. LOL

Also, the Catholic Mafia and the Zionist were responsible for the crimes in Germany.
Similarly, history is repeating itself. U.S. is going to take the place of Nazi Germany since the zionist-assyrian cabal as well as Ratzinger or the Roman Pope (the last one) will be controlling the earth. This time, U.S. lost it's power to Lucifer itself. Aren't they praying daily to Chief Lucifer so he could reign on earth?
Posted by: EZ on January 21, 2006 at 11:36pm
Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it]

EZ: Ratzinger will not join the Zionists at all this time......He's now going after their hides.

Ronald
Posted by: RonaldReagan on January 21, 2006 at 11:44pm
Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it]

Ronald:
Is this what you wanted me to see in your link?
August 18th 2005

Pope's Moral Example - The usual inordinate amount of coverage is being given to Pope Ratzinger's trip to Germany to participate in World Youth Day (which oddly lasts for a week) where the head of the Roman Catholic church will reach out to young people. Less attention is given to another news story from Texas involving Ratzinger and young folk - one he will be less happy to read. In Germany large numbers of the young faithful, no doubt boosted by the casually curious, have flocked to Cologne. It is estimated that an open-air mass given by Ratzinger on Sunday will attract up to a million people. Coverage has also been given to his visit to a Cologne synagogue, which was destroyed by the Nazis and rebuilt 20 years later. No coverage is being given to the questions that still remain about the Pope's military service and desertion towards the end of World War II. Many may consider these to be of little import 60 years later but when someone claims the moral high ground and dictates to others how they should live, nothing can be beyond scrutiny. This also goes for the other Pope story in the press - a lawsuit in Texas accuses Ratzinger of conspiring to conceal the molestation of three boys by a seminarian there, dating to the mid 90's, when Ratzinger was merely the pontiff's mastiff rather than the top dog himself. In those days he had a reputation as Pope Wojtyla's enforcer, or panzerkardinal as he was less-than-affectionately known. An attorney representing three boys, who have brought a civil suit accusing seminarian Juan Carlos Patino-Arango of molesting them, claims that the then Cardinal Ratzinger conspired to hide Patino-Arango's crimes and help him escape prosecution. 80 commented on this back in May - see Holy Omerta. An article in the Guardian says that Ratzinger was served with notice that he was named in the lawsuit in January of this year. The reaction to this has now been made known - Ratzinger's lawyers, acting for him under his nom du pape, Benedict XVI, have asked President Bush to declare the pontiff immune from liability because he is a head of state. In 80's, no doubt simplistic, view this is patently not the action of an innocent man wrongly accused of conspiracy to conceal a crime, but a guilty one seeking to avoid prosecution with a legal dodge. One wonders how many of the young folk thronging the streets of Cologne are destined to be groped by priests, something all the more likely while the Church is still in denial about the extent of the problem. What example is set for the minions in the Catholic hierarchy when the man at the very top, their moral leader, uses legal chicanery to avoid answering his accusers?

When is a State Not a State? - when it is the Vatican/Holy See of course. It seems it is not only at the quantum scale that something can be in two states at once. 80 wrote recently about a move to have Pope Ratzinger testify over an alleged priestly abuse cover up (see Pope's Moral Example). This report from the New York Times (reg rqd) updates that case informing us "The Justice Department has told a Texas court that a lawsuit accusing Pope Benedict XVI of conspiring to cover up the sexual molestation of three boys by a seminarian should be dismissed because the pontiff enjoys immunity as head of state of the Holy See." Got that? Pope = head of state = immunity. Now read this story from the Daily Telegraph about the hunt for a war criminal, General Ante Gotovina, who, it is claimed, is hiding in one of 80 Croatian monasteries with a "...£2.8 million bounty on his head." (Since 2003 - see here) Ah, but which monastery? Carla del Ponte, the chief prosecutor of the UN international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia realized that the Roman Catholic church could help with inquiries. She traveled to meet Archbishop Giovanni Lajolo, the Vatican's equivalent of a foreign minister. He rebuffed her request for help, telling her "..the Vatican was not a state and thus had "no international obligations" to help the UN to hunt war criminals." So the Vatican/Holy See is not a state - and yet this is the opposite to the argument over the Texas abuse case. Can we say two-faced hypocrites? Yes, I rather think we can. 80 recalls this sort of double dealing and lies whenever the Roman Catholic church says it should be respected and have special recognition within say, the European Union or the UN. Respect? The only thing it deserves is contempt. Liars and hypocrites are still liars and hypocrites whether they wear clerical vestments or not.
Priestly Prick - no, don't jump to conclusions, this isn't about sexual child abuse by a Catholic priest but it is undoubtedly abuse. According to this CBS report the Rev. Arthur Michalka, 78, called upon 15 children and some adults to come forward at evening mass - then he pricked them with a pin. Not just a pin, but an unsterilized one. Perhaps the silly old fool thought that the odor of sanctity beat out possibly dangerous infections - or he just didn't think at all. His purpose in this bizarre behavior was to demonstrate the pain Jesus suffered during crucifixion. With a pin? By way of explanation Michalka said "What I was trying to teach them is that suffering is a part of life." What he may succeed in teaching them is that a trusted priest has put them at risk from HIV/AIDS, hepatitis and other possibly deadly infections in a demonstration of his own reckless stupidity. Although the chance of infection is small it is not zero and Michalka is now contrite. He plans to apologize for not having sterilized the pin - it is not mentioned whether he will apologize for the idiotic comparison between a barbaric method of torture and execution with a pin prick. He is reported as saying, without a trace of irony "I didn't think it was that big a deal, I can see the point now." Still with the Roman Catholic church the Two Percent Co. answers the riddle "What do you get when you refuse to admit homosexuals to the clergy?" with " A lot of empty seminaries" To find out why, see here.

SHOW ME PROOF RATZINGER IS DISBANDING THE JESUITS 22.Jan.2006 06:33

rese

Huffington Post: Israel has sights on Iran

I posted a comment last night and its gone, so I'm repeating it here.

Plunger's comments are Brilliant. He shows using published evidence the trail of Israeli involvement in the planning and events of 911 and coverup of the Big Lie.

Yet it is true that there are two foreign governments agents running around America. The influence of the second is greater, since they helped create Israel, and they actually are the one's in charge of the CFR and thous CIA. They also outnumber the Mossad in America.

They created the Illuminiati, they planned for the war between Muslims and Jews, and they are determined to destroy Consititutional Republican government in the USA.

The corrupt government supports them and works with them.

Rese:

THOSE ARE ACCUSATIONS brought by the lawyers, the yiddish lawyers.

I have seen proof Ratzinger is disbanding the jesuits. He has no choice now, and realizes the Catholic Church has been infested with this evil.

Ronald

Ronald it's not enough to say, I have seen proof Ratzinger is disbanding the Jesuits. Show me that proof.

No pope has ever succeeded in disbanding them, and when they do attempt to do so, they're either poisoned to death, or have deadly accidents.

I mentioned that Judge Alito, who you say "is in the Pope's hands" and I find this scarey because the Pope is inThe Superior General of the Jesuits, Klovenbach's hands.

I mentioned Alito was reportedly soft on the Moving Van buisnesses and Mafia connected leaders, the same companies that were found to be operating as Israeli front buisnesses, who employed the 5 dancing Israelis, on 911.

These companies were protected by Alito.Why?

Please read how Michael Ledeen's helping prepare the US for War with Iran at
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/01/332303.shtml and all its comments

CIA Resurrects Dead Bin Laden.WHY?

 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/01/332303.shtml

Show me proof that Ratzinger is Disbanding the Jesuits, because they're the ones out to end this Nation,
as a Constitutional Republic.
Posted by: Rese on January 22, 2006 at 09:21am
Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it]

report claimed false 22.Jan.2006 13:15

plunger

Bin Laden Tape Probably Faked by CIA:
 http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0601/S00167.htm

Ronald:
The point I was making about the deeds of the Jesuits was that as you agree, they have done terrirble things in the Past, and go unchecked throughout history.
They need to be banned.As we all know money does a lot.

They have control of the Vatican finances, and their own.

Chase Manhattan bank is mostly owned by the Vatican.

(Remember the treasures the Vatican has at its disposal!!
I admit many of the worlds bankers are Zionists, and if you bothered to read the article
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/01/332303.shtml

I was refering you to, there is a long essay on finance by the Illuminati:
leading to Vatican financing.

This is also very interesting:

NY Fed. Reserve, Peter Peterson, and Blackstone/TRW at WTC7 13.Jan.2006 12:14


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

bells and whistles link


"As a result, the new owners are not required to make any payments under their lease, but they will be able to collect on the loss of the buildings that collapsed or were otherwise destroyed and damaged in the attacks."

Ostensibly the 'owners' would additionally be the mortgage holders, right? That would be Peter Peterson's large entirely private investment vehicle Blackstone.

First in power in the Nixon admin, like so many others involved in 9-11 activities, Peter Peterson was was made Chair of the NY Fed. Reserve on Jan. 1. 2000 (the NY Fed is the only one in the 'faux federal' system of any massive monetary scale or importance).

His Blackstone corp already fully owns the military contractor TRW, does lots of black ops presumably...

In 2000, Blackstone bought up the WTC7 morgage! It made sure to take the full mortgage instead of all for multiple investors like before. It bought them all out to have the full mortgage on the building.

In 2000, Blackstone invested 25 million dollars in the Bush crime family's Carlyle Corporation, positioned to become the world's largest private military contractor after 9-11.

In 2000, Blackstone invested in Aviall, Inc., the world's largest buyer/seller network corporation of USED AVIATION PARTS.

Peterson's Blackstone has connections with Kissinger Associates...


An angle worth further investigation...


Ronald:
This is the article on Globalists financing I was referring to above:
 http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/introduction.htm

John Perkins, 23.Jan.2006 00:02

reader

Koran (9:11) - For it is written that a son of Arabia would awaken a fearsome Eagle. The wrath of the Eagle would be felt throughout the lands of Allah and lo, while some of the people trembled in despair still more rejoiced; for the wrath of the Eagle cleansed the lands of Allah; and there was peace.

(Note the verse number!) Hmmmmmmm?! From a Christian friend /


From: http://mujca.com
"Economic Hit Man" John Perkins Speaks Out for 9/11 Truth

2) America's Top Bin Laden Expert: Osama's Dead, the Tape is Phony

3) Oxford Union Society: "Was 911 a Conspiracy"

4) Chomsky: "There Is No War on Terror" (is he coming out of his 9/11 denial? don't bet on it just yet)

* * *

1) "Economic Hit Man" John Perkins Speaks Out for 9/11 Truth
(thanks to Tim Boyle for this!)

John Perkins is the bestselling author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. The hardcover reached #9 on the New York Times Bestseller List, the paperback is currently #9, and it has been translated into 20 languages. On national TV he has clearly said that he is appalled by the lack of investigation into 9/11 and that the media has failed us. In so many words he said we ought to be looking at whether 9/11 was an inside job. For him to do this took courage, and it will help to open minds to the issue.

Is this a sign the 9/11 Truth issue could be moving from "unmentionable" to "an issue that really should be investigated"?

There is a strong link between John Perkins and Amy Goodman. On the book's website (www.economichitman.com), the story of his 12/31/04 appearance on Democracy Now is prominently featured on the home page, and a DVD of the interview is available for purchase. He was interviewed again on DN in recent weeks. Perhaps Perkins' willingness to suggest that 9/11 might have been an inside job will allow Amy (and by extension The Nation, The Progressive, Mother Jones, Harpers, and other progressive media) to give the 9/11 Truth issue a place to stand soon. When false flag operations can be openly discussed, we are getting closer to "the tipping point". Keep up the good work!

BookTV on CSpan2 1/21/06
Featuring John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
Taped at Politics & Prose Bookstore, Washington DC, 1/10/06
Excerpt from the Q & A session

<Begin transcript>

Q: I'd like to commend you for the work you've done, really showing the American public how deeply evil the people who run this country have been willing to stoop. It's very hard for a lot of people to really face how evil our leaders have chosen to become. I'm active on the 9/11 issue and most of the respected people in the movement, in the peace movement, won't even give proper respect to that. I'm going to ask you what your knowledge is if you've looked at the issues involved, with claiming that there is a coverup. I'll ask one very specific question which is very concise. Did you know that the Kean commission, an official goverment commission, did not even mention that Number 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story building, collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11/01 without being hit by a plane? Taller than any building in Maryland or Virginia. It wasn't mentioned, and the NY Times and the Washington Post didn't mention that it wasn't mentioned.

John Perkins: Yeah, and there are some excellent books and some excellent dvds and films on that whole subject including the one that shows that there was never a plane shown crashing into the Pentagon which haven't gotten around very much. I wish they would get around more. You know, I don't really like to speculate on things I don't know much about. And I don't know, you know a lot more about that than I do, and I like to talk about things I really know about. I know there are a lot of good films around but they're not getting wide circulation.

Q: Go to 911truth.org, that's a good place to start.

John Perkins: 911truth.org, yeah, go to it. And the other thing is you know it has struck me that if someone were to rob the bank down the street here tomorrow, probably the first thing the police would do would be to look for an inside job, right? But it's, you know, like, it ought to, I was in the Amazon on 9/11 and shortly after that I went up to Ground Zero. I was amazed when I came back from the Amazon, as I was driving up--I flew into the Miami airport, and I was driving up to my home in another part of Florida--and listening and I was expecting to hear people talking about, well let's look at who really did this. But even on NPR and on every radio station, I didn't hear any of that, and as I said, I don't know anything about 9/11 really and what really happened there, but I'm amazed by the lack of true investigation that seems to have gone into that. It just appalls me because it really, coming where I come from, it's extremely difficult for me to believe that that whole thing was masterminded by a man living in a cave with a walkie talkie. But I don't know.

<End transcript>


2) America's Top Bin Laden Expert: Osama's Dead, the Tape is Phony: ABC News  http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story? section=local&id=3828678

Op-Ed by Kevin Barrett,  http://mujca.com

As a Ph.D. Islamologist and Arabist I really hate to say this, but I'll say it anyway: 9/11 had nothing to do with Islam. The war on terror is as phony as the latest "Bin Laden tape." (1)

It's a tough thing to admit, because I know on which side my bread is buttered—and dropping Islam from the 9/11 equation is dropping my slice of bread butter-side-down. The myth that 9/11 had something to do with Muslims has poured millions, if not billions, into Arabic and Islamic studies. I finished my Ph.D. last year, so all I have to do is keep my eyes in my pocket and my nose on the ground, parrot the party line, and I'll be on the fast track to tenure track.

The trouble is, it's all based on a Big Lie. Take the recent "bin Laden" tape—please! That voice was no more bin Laden than it was Rodney Dangerfield channeling my late Aunt Corinne from Peoria. I recently helped translate a previously unknown bin Laden tape, a real one from the early 90's, back when he was still alive. I know the guy's flowery religious rhetoric. The recent tape wasn't him.

The top American bin Laden expert agrees. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's Religious Studies department, has just published a book of translations of bin Laden's speeches. He says the recent tape is a fake, and that bin Laden has been dead for years. (2)

Ersatz Bin Laden tapes, "verified" by the CIA, are nothing new. Every "Bin Laden" statement since 2001 has been blatantly bogus. The last we heard from the real Bin Laden came in his post-9/11 statements to Pakistani journalists: "I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation... I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States... I had no knowledge of these attacks..." (3)

Then on December 13th, 2001, as George Bush was whining about the "outrageous conspiracy theories" that were spreading like wildfire, the first and shoddiest of the "Bin Laden speaks from beyond the grave" tapes appeared. The video's sound and picture quality were horrible. It showed a big guy with a black beard, doing a passable imitation of Bin Laden's voice, claiming foreknowledge, if not responsibility, for the 9/11 attacks, and chortling over their success. The trouble was, the big guy clearly was not Bin Laden. He was at least 40 or 50 pounds heavier, and his facial features were obviously different. (4)

The "Fatty Bin Laden" tape was widely ridiculed, and I have yet to meet an informed observer who considers it authentic. (If you haven't figured this out yet, go back and look at the images from the tape, and compare them to other images of Bin Laden.) But the media let the fraud pass without asking the hard questions: Why was the US government waving this blatantly fake "confession" video in our faces?

Perhaps due to the widespread hilarity evoked by "Fatty Bin Laden," the next "Osama from beyond the grave" message had no images—it was an audio tape delivered to al-Jazeera in fall, 2002. The CIA verified it as authentic, and then got a rotten egg in the face when the world's leading voice identification experts at IDIAP in Switzerland reported that "the message was recorded by an impostor." (5)

Every "bin Laden" message since then has been equally phony. They are released at moments when the Bush Regime needs a boost—and the American media goes along with the fraud. Remember the bogus bin Laden tape that made headlines right before the 2004 presidential elections? If you didn't figure out that it was a CIA-produced commercial for George Bush, I have some great bridges to sell you. Walter Cronkite, bless his heart, opined that Karl Rove was behind that tape. (6) But the rest of the media just kept pretending that the Emperor was clothed.

And the fraud continues. Last week's "bin Laden" tape has been ridiculed by America's top bin Laden expert—yet the US media keeps right on holding a transparent fig leaf in front of the Emperor's crotch! Professor Lawrence believes that this phony tape was designed to distract world opinion from the horrific massacre of Pakistani civilians by an errant CIA drone. But it may have another, more sinister purpose: To prepare public opinion for another false-flag 9/11 style attack designed to trigger a US-Israeli nuclear attack on Iran. (7)

As our top Bin Laden expert Professor Lawrence informs us, the real Bin Laden, who insisted that he had nothing to do with 9/11, has been dead for quite some time--probably 1since 2001. The fake messages have been fabricated by al-CIA-duh to support the Bush regime and its phony "war on terror." It is time for Americans to rise up in revolt against the fake-terror masters who are looting US taxpayers, torching our Constitution, demolishing our economy, and threatening nuclear Armageddon.

# # #

About the author:

Kevin Barrett holds a Ph.D. in Arabic, with a focus in Islamic Studies, from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He is a co-founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth:  http://mujca.com


References:

(1) "The Making of the Terror Myth." The Guardian 10/15/04
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1327904,00.html

(2) ABC News  http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story? section=local&id=3828678

(3)  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_for_the_September_11,_2001_attacks

(4)  http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/binladinvideo.html

(5) The Guardian 1//30/02:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,12469,851112,00.html

(6) CNN:  http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0410/29/lkl.01.html
quoted in:  http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/binladen_cronkite.html

(7) American Conservative 8/1/05:  http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html
discussed in:  http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=6734
alarming new article in Jerusalem Post:  link to www.jpost.com



Oxford Union Society: "Was 911 a Conspiracy"

 http://www.oxford-union.org/termcard.php?PHPSESSID=babb6829c6917b573094c3304
cc68e2e

Today one of the world's most famous debating forums will consider the taboo
question at the heart of the war on terror. Is the official Washington story
of the 911 attacks correct, or is 911 a myth created by Washington's
military industrial complex to justify a generation of lucrative wars?

The Oxford Union has invited 911 sceptics David Shayler and Annie Machon,
both ex-MI5 officers, Ian Henshall co-author of non-fiction best-seller 911
Revealed, and risk analyst Bill Durodié to discuss whether the attacks
occurred in anything like the way the mainstream Washington news
organisations claim.

Ian Henshall said today:

After the WMD fiasco, newsrooms have so far been unwilling to ask whether
they were duped by their intelligence sources over 911 as well. So much
evidence has been seized by the US authorities and never made public that it
is impossible to say for sure how the 911 attacks happened. There are now
several versions of the official story which stand in open conflict with
each other. Many believe the attacks were manipulated or allowed to succeed
and quite a lot of evidence has leaked out to support this.

Ian Henshall's book 911 revealed co-authored with Rowland Morgan was given
favourable reviews in the DailyMail and the Sunday Times, but although it is a
non-fiction best-seller it has so far been ignored by the mainstream broadcast
media, despite their legal obligation to due impartiality.



 http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/011506B.shtml

Chomsky: 'There Is No War on Terror'

"The fact of the matter is that there is no War on Terror. It's a minor consideration. So invading Iraq and taking control of the world's energy resources was way more important than the threat of terror."

No kidding, Noam. Since the 9/11 coup, Chomsky has been turning his not-inconsiderable intellectual resources inside-out trying to explain how the neocons just got lucky with the 9/11 "New Pearl Harbor" they needed to follow a pre-ordained agenda. Whether he's consciously covering up, or a whole lot dumber than he seems, remains to be determined.

Kevin Barrett
Coordinator, MUJCA-NET:  http://mujca.com

cut the old man some slack 24.Jan.2006 02:49

he won't be with us much longer

> Since the 9/11 coup, Chomsky has been turning his not-inconsiderable
> intellectual resources inside-out trying to explain how the neocons
> just got lucky with the 9/11 "New Pearl Harbor" they needed to follow
> a pre-ordained agenda.

Chomsky's like 90 years old. He's hardly the only one just too horrified to deal with the truth. They never got away with anything quite like this before, and some people just can't adjust their model to accommodate it.