portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting united states

drug war | health

Public opinion shifts on legalization of drugs

It was recently announced that Rhode Island has enacted law legalizing medical marijuana -- over the veto of their Republican governor. Governor Donald L. Carcieri is that rare bird in today's world -- a populist moderate Republican who defeated the party-approved candidate in the 2002 primary and then defeated the Democratic candidate in the general election. But Carcieri took the hard line on medical marijuana, daring the legislature to over-ride his veto. The legislature did just that.
Rhode Island is generally considered a solid "blue" Democratic state, mostly "liberal" although "conservative" on what are called "social" issues. Thus, the shift in opinion on legalization of medical marijuana is highly significant.

Although mostly Democratic, the state's senior U.S. Senator is Lincoln Chaffee, one of the few Republicans in the Senate who regularly votes against the Senate Republican leadership. Representative Patrick Kennedy (yes, one of THOSE Kennedy's) represents the 1st Congressional District.

Another example of the shift in public opinion was shown in a Christmas poll of about 600 liberal-to-progressive activist Democrats. The poll available at Daily Kos website is more significant than many on-line polls because only people who have been registered for a while at the website can vote, and no one can vote twice. Result: nearly all rank-and-file Dems favor legalization of marijuana, while 7 out of 10 favor legalization of ALL drugs.

Poll is available at Daily Kos blogsite with blog by "Jerome a Paris" (title: "A very simple drugs policy") --

QUESTION: Should drugs be legalized?

Yes, no exceptions 415 votes - 71 %
Yes, but not hard drugs 151 votes - 26 %
Only alcohol and tobacco like today 6 votes - 1 %
No, even alcohol and tobacco should be made illegal 5 votes - 0 %

The blog also favored inclusion of alcohol as a "drug" -- to be treated like other drugs.

 http://www.dailykos.com/poll/1135545092_spKhMvXA
_______________

"Something is happening and you don't know what it is, do you, Mr. Jones?"
It needs to be changed from a Schedule 1 narcotic to a schedule 2 04.Jan.2006 06:33

Zaki

Regardless if all the states were to enact medical marijuana laws, we would still be facing the same problem, it is a schedule 1 narcotic under federal law, meaning that it has no medical value, and sobeit the feud between the state governments and the federal government. In even I, who sat on the board of directors of the Stormy Ray Foundation, and also spent years working with Voter Power funding campaigns and radio ads in attempt to appease the people in Oregon who needed the most help without the strength or resources, that is the sick and dying, concede. It was foolish to take a medical marijuana case to the Supreme Court cause the ruling was just. It was not presented as a constitutional issue of individual rights, and the court ruled justly. If the states want medical marijuana laws that are not in conflict with the federal government, then it needs to be changed from a schedule 1 narcotic to a schedule 2 narcotic or lesser, in my opinion it should be classified in the same schedule as herbs and supplements needing no FDA approval, but as we all no, there is no Real Santa Clause. After working with Stormy Ray for months in Salem, we were only able to get it on the floor of a sub-committee, which seemed to me no more than a gesture of kindness with no real attempt to pass to the floor, for the evidence is over whelming.
Now after that experience, I truly believe that it would be impossible to achieve on a federal level what could not be achieved at a state level, especially when considering the big money from drug companies, the DEA, and every feel good family liar organizations about the danger of marijuana to the scapegoat always used, our children. So since these people do not have the capabilities to properly educate their children about the truth in the dangers of drugs, like more serious drugs as nicotine, alcohol and many other legal and over the counter drugs, the sick and dying must suffer, and suffer do they.
However, if one abstains from care giving for others, or attempts to grow marijuana for patients while being compensated, and keeps the number of marijuana plants to a minimum, then there would never be any federal intervention. As it stands now, possession of thirty grams or less of marijuana is not a federal crime.
However, for people who are not American Citizens, it is a whole other assortment of problems.