NEW PROOF: 9/11 Firefighters Were Told HOURS in advance that WTC Bldg 7 Would Collapse
author: Angie
 e-mail: angiesept11@yahoo.com
Recently released transcripts of interviews with firefighters after 9/11 reveal that they were Told SEVERAL HOURS in advance that WTC Bldg #7 would collapse even though fire had never felled such a building before-This was the 3rd building that collapsed on 9/11 after the twin towers that few people know about & it is further evidence that the buildings must have been demolished with explosives, meaning that 9/11 was an inside job, not the work of alleged arab hijackers.
In fact, they established a "collapse zone" in advance 5 blocks long and waited around for WTC#7 to fall. How could anyone have known Building #7 would fall when no similar type building had ever collapsed due to fire before? It must have been a controlled, deliberate demolition, something which takes time to prepare, and having no relationship with any alleged arab hijackers.
|
Note below a few things.
1) First, here is a ***new*** article about September 11th, which
is based on recently released transcripts of firefigthers
inteviewed after 9/11.
"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account
Cannot Be True," 911Review.com, December 9, 2005
 http://911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html
2) Below is a tiny excerpt from it, only concerned with the destruction of World Trade Center Building #7 (but note that the article has lots of information about the Twin Towers too, which demonstrate that the official story of 9/11 is bogus, and that 9/11 must be an inside job):
----------------------------------------------------
"Widespread Notification: At least 25 of the firefighters and medical
workers reported that, at some time that day, they learned that
building 7 was going to collapse. Firefighters who had been fighting
the fires in the building said they were ordered to leave the
building, after which a collapse zone was established. As medical
worker Decosta Wright put it: "they measured out how far the building
was going to come, so we knew exactly where we could stand," which was
"5 blocks away" (NYT, Wright, pp. 11-12).
Early Warning: As to exactly when the expectation of the collapse
began circulating, the testimonies differ. But most of the evidence
suggests that the expectation of collapse was communicated 4 or 5
hours in advance.[72]
The Alleged Reason for the Expectation: But why would this expectation
have arisen? The fires in building 7 were, according to all the
photographic evidence, few and small. So why would the decision-makers
in the department have decided to pull firefighters out of building 7
and have them simply stand around waiting for it to collapse?
The chiefs gave a twofold explanation: damage plus fire. Chief
Frank Fellini said: "When [the north tower] fell, it ripped steel out
from between the third and sixth floors across the facade on Vesey
Street. We were concerned that the fires on several floors and the
missing steel would result in the building collapsing" (NYT, Fellini,
p. 3).
There are at least two problems with each part of this
explanation.:" (see link to article above to continue)
--------------------------------------------------
3) For links to the actual transcripts of these firefighter
interviews (so you can read them yourself) as well as background
information about their release, see
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/10/326218.shtml
and also note the following article which indicates some of those
transcripts were REDACTED (portions deleted or stricken from them
before they were released) - Village Voice article entitled "Blots on
the Record, The Bloomberg administration's fight for 9-11 secrecy"
link to www.villagevoice.com
evoice.com/news/0542%2Cmurphy%2C68951%2C5.html
;
Finally, this article can be cited to demonstrate that there were firefighters
on the scene on 9/11 who survived and were NOT interviewed - New York Times:
"9/11 Firefighters Told of Isolation Amid Disaster", 9/9/05,
link to select.nytimes.com
82
("Many who escaped from the north tower did not give histories", etc.)
but of course there is no mention of who decided which firefighters to
interview and which not to interview or how those selected were selected.
Angie
911 Truth Movement Musings (Watching the Watchers)
http://www.Angieon911.com
|
homepage: http://www.angieon911.com
add a comment on this article
add a comment on this article
discussion from this article
|
And this is what Indymedia is now -- a bulletin board of trash with no distinction between rank speculation, bullshit -- and the kind of media that's actually concerned with truth and helping people get together and build a better world.
I live in NYC. I lived in Tribeca, in the first residential tower that wasn't forcibly evacuated. I was a few blocks north of the towers when they went down. Close enough to run.
7 World Trade wasn't "pulled." This is so much bullshit. I know many people who were immediately in the vicinity, including a fire fighter who was down there that day. This is all bullshit -- mostly promoted by right-wing conspiracy theoriests who still swarm around New York.
I fucking saw it fall. There was no "blast." It's all BS. (New York Indymedia has the inegrity to avoid printing this kind of unsubstantiated crap, btw.)
But I bet when I check back through in six months, you'll still be posting the same re-hashed garbage. This is what Indymedia has become. It's why no one I know takes it seriously, and why a noble experiment has failed.
You don't care what's true. It's all "narrative."
Really. What a waste.