portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting portland metro

neighborhood news

Boise Neighbors Discuss Mississippi Lofts Project

Mississippi Avenue, between Skidmore and Fremont, seems to be center stage for new up-scale development. In the last two years, the identity of the area has changed rapidly. So much so, that I can no longer use data from the 2000 census reliably. Large swaths of property are being bought up by prospectors and the plans of development of churning. In the next two years the identity of this neighborhood will be very different. In December 2002 E.D. Hovee and Company (EDH) prepared and Econmic Development Strategy for the Mississippi Historic Distric. That can be viewed in .pdf form here, I will refer to pages and diagrams from that report, so best to open it up.
Architectural speculation
Architectural speculation
This is an intense document with some things that need to be clarified. First, on page 16 (Figure 12) the number of participants for those surveys are very low. In the commercial district survey, there were 11 voters, community building had 20, employment had 13, and housing only had 10 participants. I am unsure why the response was so low (or how responses were gathered) but those statisitics are important for determining the value of this data, for reference the Boise Neighborhood has over 3000 residents. The next thing, and the really important thing in this document is Figure 6. It denotes 10 key sites for development/redevelopment. Some of the sites have since been developed. Site 6 is the Mississippi Commons mini business plaza, site 7 is Amnesia Brewing (to the north of which is a small community school), site 4 is the the Kurisu Development project, and site 1 is what the community met about tonight.

The property at site 1, 4138 N Mississippi Ave, includes 200 feet of frontage on the avenue. The development team, investors, and concerned neighbors met tonight (11.19.05) at the Mississippi Rising Ballroom to see some sketches of the development, listen to some community opinions, and field a few questions about their development.

The discussion started with a brief introduction of the developers/investors. David Yoho, land use co-chair for the Boise neighborhood and investor (? i am unsure of this) of the project, spoke first and introduced the planner for the project (i beleive), Peter. Peter explained his history in the NE neighborhoods and showed some awards he'd gotten and some images of his previous works. The idea seemed to be urban sanctuaries, and it looked nice. Then on of the architects was introduced. The architect firm is "Michael Willis Architects," and they started it off by explaining the initial design. The initial design is a four story (45ft) mixed use building, with retail in the front, parking in the back, and the the condos would be built on top of the parking structure/retail base.

The parking was the first large issue, in this neighborhood parking has become a problem. With all of the destination businesses between fremont and shaver, the lack of adequate parking has become apparent. On a weekend night, it is hard for residents within two blocks of the area to find parking near their home. New developments in the area are addressing parking in some way. These developers have decided to use alley access parking, with the initial idea of having at least one parking space for each residential unit they offer. They said that the condos wouldnt come with a parking space, that the parking spaces would be an additional fee. They used words like transit-oriented, saying that they would like to encourage alternative transit and that parking spaces would be sold at a premium. They are just a few blocks east of the light rail, steps away from the crowded number 4, will provide ample bicycle parking, and will include at least one flex-car space.

Some concerns included the increase of traffic in the alleyway, the parking not being for retail shoppers thus continuing the cycle of nearby residents searching for parking. It also didnt appear as if the the developers/architects reached out to the nearby residents to explain their plan personally to them (especially the homeowners/renters that will be bordering the new development.)

The building they plan to build will, by all accounts, be huge! 45 feet is the code, however, they are building 45ft high at the north end of the property, and there is a 6ft slope to the south end, meaning that the south end will be 51ft if the building is to be level. Above the retail will be two floors of residential, the back half will be two floor townhouses, and the front half will be two floors of single floor residential units. The fourth floor, penthouse lofts, are what makes this building stand out. The architects have tentatively set the fourth floor back ten feet on the front and part of the sides so that the visual impact looks to be only 3 stories. The ten foot loss of livable space will be a deck for the residents. This is nice because of the visual impact, however it also doesnt appear to be economically affordable for the current demographic. But, it will probably offer a spectacular view.

There were alos alot of questions about the retail spaces that they are planning. One of the developers deals specifically with retail and they have a basic retail plan. Based on the community surveys of the EDH Company (page 16), boise neighborhood associations polls, and a survey done by Our United Villages the ideal establishment would be a small market. A market that offers fresh produce and other edible goods for the folks that live in the neighborhood. The developers seemed intent of trying to bring in a semi-upscale market like Food Front, or PastaWorks. One very good question asked was "how will this market affect Big City Produce?" Big City Produce is a local community oriented market about 10 blocks north of the current site.

In total, they laid out a nice plan with and seem genuine in their intentions, and relatively honest about their motives (a few of them admitted that they would be partial to living in the lofts). However, being community minded and business oriented is a bit of a polar opposite. The forces of business move much quicker than the collective effort of communities. When asked what their timeline was, they said they would start in late spring 06. They said they would continue to come to neighborhood association meetings and field questions, report updates, etc. Ultimately, they said they wanted to gaint he support of the community, and "want to set a precedent with how devolpers interact with the community."

Again, that all sounded genuine, and the design looks nice. They said that the market rate for development contiunes to rise and that plans change. The costs of development are always fluctacting and the feasability of offering a community oriented neighborhood positive building could continue to reduce to the point that what is said now is nothing like what we get. It is important for the folks that are concerned to continue to ask questions and represent your views to the architects, developers and the Boise Neighborhood Association. It is also important for developers to engage the residents that abutt their project and listen especially well to what is requested.

As positive as this all sounds, it is a business venture and the main goal of business and capitalism is to create money and create a market for making money. One of the problems with the new destination business that have gone up in the last few years is that there isnt a strong enough community here to support them, there are too many folks from a past era to currently make things economical. With the Kaiser lofts, the Mississippi lofts, and at least two other condo developments coming up, that new community may be only a year away. And, one last quick thing. With the large Kurisu development at the northeast corner of Mississippi and Shaver, and the Mississippi Lofts on the southeast corner of Mississippi and Skidmore, the business district is decidedly expanding. And what is all residential (for the most part) in between will now be sandwhiched the foreboding large scale (tall) buildings and the residents between these two will probably suffer...thats just my opinion, as one of those residents.

homepage: homepage: http://boisevoice.org

and 19.Nov.2005 22:29

joseph failing

just wanted to add to the benefits to the community. neighbors sharing the alley with the new lofts will have not 1 not 2 not 3 but around 25 new neighbors drinking wine on their balconys enjoying their view of mount hood while staring into back yards, oh yeah, and they will never be able to enjoy again our beautiful smog splashed sunsets!

the sun shall no longer set on mississippi st 20.Nov.2005 02:09

tia

I feel so sorry for you of modest incomes on mississippi. A once beautiful neighborhood is being aesthetically diminished, and methodically transformed to be affordable only to moderately wealthy to wealthy people.

Mississippi is mostly a north to south running street. One of its most charming characteristics has been light from the gradually setting sun. That is probably going away. As developers buy up street frontage, naturally, as is demonstrated by building bht describes on site 1, they are not inclined to confine the height of their new structures to that of existing structures. They want to build higher for more rentable square footage, and in so doing, gradually replace the sunset spilt streets of missippi with dark, shadowy, artificially lit canyons.

Is this what earlier established mississippi residents want their neighborhood to become? Some of the frontage on mississippi didn't have any buildings on it when I was there sometime back. Truly visionary individuals would seriously consider taking steps to preserve that layout, sustaining the unique company that mississippi street has kept with natural light.

The new businesses have created the parking problem by attracting car driving customers, but rather than discouraging them from visiting the neighborhood without their cars, they accomodate them by using land that could have provided retail, professional or housing use, to build parking. Some form of shuttle makes more, reasonable sense.

This neighborhood is just becoming another yuppie enclave, surrendering its quality of living to a baubles and bangles strip.

developers are greedy, evil bastids 20.Nov.2005 09:37

sick of it

I'm not sure what can be done to stop it, but Portland is moving in a very sad direction.
For people who've lived here for 25 years or more, with family roots that go back several generations, it is really disheartening to see this happen. That the exhorbitant cost of housing, or that new, taller, bigger, types of housing might permanently displace long-time residents who have a stake in their city, is a tragic loss for all of us.
Don't forget, though, that this is not a completely new situation. Imagine how the indigenous NW tribal people must feel. Imagine the thousands of African American families who were ghetto-ized into N/NE Portland due to the banks racist red-lining practices.
Today, in the name of profit, developers consistently think nothing of killing all of the charm and appeal of a unique neighborhood (with all of its problems) in favor of creating a squeaky clean Disneyfied urban playground for wealthy newcomers who have no understanding or appreciation for what was there before they came.
So, what else is new?

Neighborhood municipalities 21.Nov.2005 11:46

neighbor

I like to see newly restored, clean beautiful buildings, and I enjoy enlivened, colorful, prosperous street life. But I don't like greedy, opportunistic developers coming into a neighborhood, putting on the nicey-nice face, singing their sweet lullabies, and proceedng to rape the community for all its worth. The progression becomes NW 23rd Avenue. The concept of destination retail needs to be put to an immediate halt. Any new business activity in a neighborhood needs to be to serve primarily those who live within walking distance of the area. Serve their needs, not someone else driving in.

What neighborhoods need to do is become their own independent municipalities and thus gain true political power. Why not? Ancient cities had about the same population sizes are our current neighborhoods. Many towns have even smaller populations. Why shouldn't neighborhoods establish their own strong, independent political power? In this way, they can direct the kinds of developments and restoration projects that they want, not always in reactive positions against what outside developers want. Unless we can establish this kind of power and self-determination, we will continue to find our livability compromised.

Stop sprawl 21.Nov.2005 13:38

Sprawl sucks

Why dont we get these kind of reports for new sprawl developments going on in town. Endless sprawl of 5,000 sq ft McMansions on 10,000 sq ft lots built on forest wildlife habitat is and should be the real enemy. Not only is land paved forever but entire old growth forests are cut for the timber for these filthy McMansions.

not paved forever 21.Nov.2005 15:39

jason

Yeah, sprawl sucks, but land isn't paved forever.

As soon as our society collapses, it will probably only be a few years before weeds are coming up through cracks all over the pavement, and the ivey will cover and eat everything, and in a hundred years, you could walk through beaverton and not even know there was a neighborhood there.

We don't build shit to last, it's designed to fall apart so we have to buy more.



On the other hand, the growth around Mississppi avenue will probably make more poor minority families financially comfortable than any other social program in portland (by raising the values of thier homes) and I'd rather see the families around there benifit than the snobs in Lauralhurst. Some will also be forced to leave when they cannot affoard rent, that's a shame.

some people get enticed away with the carrot 21.Nov.2005 18:02

some people get driven away with the stick

> On the other hand, the growth around Mississppi avenue will probably make more poor minority families
> financially comfortable than any other social program in portland (by raising the values of thier homes)

- All the figures I can find say most black households rent.

- Even the households that benefit can only benefit by selling out and leaving. Otherwise their property taxes just go up. It's a tricky argument to say that gentrification is good because it caters to the needs of newcomers and people who are gone, while screwing everybody who liked living there before and wants to stay.

- The conflict of interests between owners and renters is a zero-sum game. If you rent a cheap place and development nearby makes it more desirable, the owner wants more money from you or he wants you out. Homelessness is one of many bad results of this let-them-eat-cake attitude about renters.

- Housing is only a successful investment if it's scarce. Commodities don't rise in value every year. As long as housing is considered an investment, investors won't allow any social, physical, or economic developments that make it plentiful enough that everybody can own.

Great Update 22.Nov.2005 10:25

Matt Batt

Thanks for the report. It was very informative. Like the other commenter I am not particularly happy with more destination shopping on Mississippi. I cannot afford high cost boutique clothes or gourmet food and I doubt to many people in the neighborhood could as well. I would rather have more businesses near me which would serve immediate community needs, such as grocery or hardware stores

Community participation ? 22.Nov.2005 11:20

Class-Struggle

One of the things I found very interesting about this so called community meeting on the proposed project,was that none of the people involved in this project,could find the time to walk from door to door down North Albina,directly behind the proposed development,to invite the house owners and renters to this meeting ? These are the people and families who are going to most affected by ,a number of livability issues for them,their west facing sun being blocked out and the increased traffic using the alleyway for both access to resident parking in the proposed development,43 spots, and for retail parking access for customer parking,which could possibly turn the alleyway into a busy main type throughway,which raises safety issues for the families that have children that have historically used the alleyways as community parks and play areas.This has historically been a family freindly neighborhood, but the developers vision is too push the families out,to make way for the new hip,artist wannbe,yuppies,that have no interest in long term community building vision or participation. I cringe when I hear these developers using the word, sustainability and bottom line in the same sentence.
Boise residents,get invloved,NOW,in your community .Because it may only be a matter of time before a development/construction project might be affecting your livability, or pushing you out of the community, like it has done already. You can start by attending the monthly Boise Neighborhood Association Meetings.Dates,times and locations can be found at: www.boisevoice.org/. Your community power is your voice , and when we all put our voices together,we can shout loudly,so that city hall will have to listen to our concerns....

Mississippi Lofts 29.Dec.2005 22:36

Boise resident

More condos? The reality is that Portland is livable in some part as a result of the UGB and zoning that allows a higher density along commercial corridors. Will property values continue to escalate? yes. Will people be forced out of neighborhoods because they only they rent? yes. Their are numerous negative consequences of "Gentrification". Portland is going to grow, where are these people going to live? Want more subdivisions eating up the farm land? Higher density will actually help keep real estate prices down, reduce automobile trips, support local businesses and yes, create community. You may not think that it is the type of community you want to be involved in? I suggest continuing dialogue, get involved, search for compromise and additional opportunity. I have lived and worked in this neighborhood for many years, long before any of the present businesses were around. The choice of crack dealers and prostitution or thriving businesses, owned primarily by first timeres and sidewalks that you can safely walk down at night is an easy one. Sacrafices? definitely! Worth it? Yes. The endeavor to develope this type of project must be very complicated. It seems like the team is sincere in their approach, I say listen more, you may find opportunities than problems

not enough space 12.Apr.2006 00:00

Justin

Well, perhaps we should pave the entire Willamette valley - hell, let's pave every inch of natural land from Seattle to San Diego. Los Angeles is an excellent model: exclusive neighborhoods, protected from encroaching EVIL redevelopers who might interfere with your views.

Actually, the most extreme example of this kind of thinking are the NIMBY's in San Francisco, the United States' most unaffordable city: average cost of housing tops $750,000.

If you make it impossible to build additional housing, where are people going to live? There are 1 million more people moving to Portland by the year 2025. The Urban Growth Boundary ain't moving much.

While I do appreciate the neighbors concerns, what else do you propose for your community to develop? There are only 3,000 residents, which aren't really enough to support a very large amount of local businesses. Parking is another issue - you expect parking to not be on the street, so you are in favor of hundred million dollar underground parking garages? Or 8 story parking towers? Just doesn't make sense.

I live in NW Portland, and, while 23rd has lots of destination boutiques on it, very few local resdients in the neighborhood actually go there every day. However, due to all the people coming and going, we have a huge amount of businesses accessible by foot. Please don't stereotype and call my neighborhood all clean and posh, because it is actually full of normal people, bums, drunks, kids, middle class people - the whole gamut. Likewise, parking just sort of resolves itself - the more density you get, and the more inconvenient parking is, the fewer people will actually drive. As an example - myself included, many of my friends who live in Portland - North, NE, SE, Pearl, Downtown, and NW - very few actually even own a car. Biking from Mississippi to Downtown takes 10 minutes, 15 at the most...

Anyways, just some things to consider. Make sure you demand the highest quality of architecture coming from any developer who builds in your neighborhood, but change is - and has - been happening in Portland for quite some years now... and fighting it is even contrary to every city and neighborhood plan thats been put forth over the past 20 years.

Anyways, sorry for the rambling... just trying to bring some perspective to things. I am excited as to what might replace the existing eyesore industrial and vacant lots along Mississippi Ave... and I am sure local businesses along the street would like to have more customers and activity on the street. It wasn't too many years ago that drug dealers were the norm, along with drive-by shootings. I'd say the changes in the neighborhood have been exclusively positive so far.

Lofts? Yes! 21.Apr.2006 09:47

longtime resident

This is a good project, folks. Yes, there are growing pains in the 'hood but this is way better than the problems we had here in 1990's. No way do we want to go back to the days of crack houses and drug dealers. I used hear gunfire on a regular basis. Arguing over how tall the new lofts on Mississippi Avenue is a giant step forward. I'm all in favor of this and any other well-designed, mixed-use development that wants to come in. Now when is the damn John Palmer house going to open up and start serving beer? I'm thirsty!

Parking crunch 01.May.2006 15:15

Nolan Marchand nolan.marchand@flexcar.com

Mississippi is indeed becoming a high density neighborhood. Many of the buildings that are planned do not have sufficient parking to give every tenant a parking spot. Parking is going to be at more and more of a premium.

With bus and Max transit nearby, it is possible to live a carless, bicycle-friendly lifestyle. If, however, you need a car, Flexcar is an option. If you want a Flexcar in the neighborhood, encourage developers to sponsor carsharing. The Mississippi Lofts are doing their part by sponsoring a car. Other develops have inquired about it, but not yet signed up.

This is a bit of shameless self-promotion. I work for Flexcar. However, I believe in it. I lived in Italy for a few years without a car and loved it. When Katrina put my house in New Orleans underwater, I chose Portland because it seemed like a place where I could again live the carless, walking life.

I can be reached at  nolan.marchand@flexcar.com if anyone has questions about how to get a car to their neighborhood.