portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting portland metro

neighborhood news

Boise Neighbors Come Out to Discuss their Community

Tonight, November 14th, the Boise Neighborhood Association (BNA) held its monthly meeting at Albina Youth Oppurtunity School (AYOS). There was a small agenda on the table, but alot to discuss. The agenda and some points exist here. The agenda points were: Green Space Grant, Drug Free Zones, and Elections.

The Green Space grant money was granted by the artice formerly known as Prince in 1992, I believe. THe idea behind the money was to create green spaces in low-income communities of color, the original amount was $10,000. A failed community project ate up $6,000 of that in 1997 I believe. The BNA asked community members to think of proposals for the remaining $4000. The Kurisu Corporation made a stunning powerpoint proposal presentation, explaining how the $4000 would cascade into the Kurisu's private Japanese Garden. The original plan is that the Kurisu's would be granted the monwy and for the first year the $4000 would be held up for possible community areas, and if the community did not come together in that year, the Kurisu's would absord that $4000 into their $250,000 Japanese Garden.

Some community members didnt see the virtue in this plan, as the money could just as easily reside in the BNA accounts until it could be used for community purposes. One point that folks didnt tend to understand was how $4000 could impact a $250,000 production...which is going to go forward whether or not the community supports it. When asked what $4000 could do for them, Koichi Kurisu said "$4000 would be a symbolic gesture or support" and that he would like the BNA to invest in their private interest.

He was asked if a letter of support would be enough for them to feel that the community is behind them, and he said "money is an action" and as we all know, actions speak louder than words.

There was a motion to vote, the first motion was that the Kurisu's would get the entire grant money and it would cascade over a year to them. That motion tied at 16 for and 16 against, abstentions werent recorded. There were two more failed proposals/motions for how the money could be distributed. The final decision was that the BNA would write a letter of support for the Kurisu project and the Kurisu's would recive $2000 of the grant money after one year of working with a community space. There were 27 yay votes, 7 nay, and 3 abstentions.

Next came the drug free zone discussion. David Woboril from the City Attorney's Office, and public defender Chris O'conner both showed up. For background information on the DFZ, please see this article. This started with the current BNA president reading through a letter that was sent by the BNA safety chair to City Council, that letter can be read here.

There was a bunchof discussion and similar questions asked at the Temple Church gathering. Mostly, it was Woboril answering the questions. He was asked about the exclusion statistics in the Beech neighborhood and he said he didnt recall them. I had the notes I took and read off the figures of 128 African American exclusions and 18 Caucasian exlusions (the two total 88% of exclusions in the Beech zone, in my notes). David Woboril, however, corrected me by saying that there should be thousands of exclusions and said "I think you can count on several exclusion a day".

There was much more discussion on this and the community didnt seem to be coming together on the issue. The room had been divided most of the evening. There was a suggestion to have a straw poll to see where folks stood on the issue. That poll generated the results: one person said that she would like to see the DFZ remain as is, 15 community members felt that the DFZ should not exist at all in our community, and 23 neighbors wanted to see a DFZ with specific changes, all of which could not be discussed tonight. Since it was getting later and there wasnt a clear resolution we decided to postpone discussion until after we held the elections. However, we never did get to that. Tentatively we talked of getting folks together at the next Saftey meeting: Boise Neighborhood Association Safety and Livability Meeting Every Fourth Wednesday of the month, 7pm Albina Youth Opportunity School.

There should be two more city hosted DFZ meetings in December. The next meeting is on December 1st, location not specified at this meeting, but hopefully can be found on http://www.portlandonline.com/mayor/ where we were told to look for such things.

Onto the elections. This was something I felt would be a rather moot formality, but turned out to be semi-contested. The required positions for the BNA are: Chair/co-chair, Secretary, Land Use, NECN Rep (x2), Safety Chair, Treasurer, and Grievance person.

There was only one nomination coming into the meeting, me, for Land Use chair. At this meeting, after all that other discussion, we that were left had to nominate and vote on the next years board. First, the nominations were people in the room saying that someone across from them should run for a position. It was rather haphazard. However, there came be someone nominated for each position.

Even Land Use. A property owner in the community decided that it would be a good idea to run for Land Use chair, and since I was already nominated, there was a vote. This was the only position on which a vote was necessary. Anyway, after some light campaigning to the room, we had a vote and the room was split 13-13. We decided to be Land Use co-chairs, in the interest of the community.

That is my interpretation of the evening. I was involved in all of these issues and am trying to present things as they were. I have held off in my personal feelings about some things, but encourage others to report their versions of the things that happened at tonight BNA meeting.

If you live in the Boise neighborhood and are interested in getting involved, here are the meeting times and schedules:

Boise Neighborhood Association General Meeting
Every Second Monday of the month at 7pm
Albina Youth Opportunity School

Boise Neighborhood Association Safety and Livability Meeting
Every Fourth Wednesday of the month, 7pm
Albina Youth Opportunity School

Boise Neighborhood Association Board Meeting
Last Monday of the Month, 6:30pm
contact boisena@gmail.com
Albina Youth Opportunity School

Land Use Planning meetings and others are scheduled as the chairperson's schedule allows.

And if you dont live in this community, get involved in the one you do live in!

homepage: homepage: http://boisevoice.org

excellent report-back 15.Nov.2005 04:48

steve endurance@riseup.net

an accurate, concise account of the metting tonight. the only differnce i have to point out is in the numbers. the total exclusions for the beech dfz, for african americans, from the meeting at emanuel temple, was 123 by my notes, also i came out with a higher percentage when combining the african american and caucasian exclussions. i think the most important part of the statistical aspect is that 83% of exclusions in the beech dfz were african american, where as the percentage of the population for african americans for the same area is just over 30%. also i am curious about the portland police bureau's report on racial bias in traffic stops. at the dfz discussion at emanuel temple, david worobil said there would be a report on racial bias in traffic stops "next month". he alluded to is again at this meeting, but not as though there was an actual report, but as something that was still unfinished. i think it is intergral to have access to any and all findings of such a report, prior to the community's decision about the dfz. i had my hand raised for a while but i didn't get to comment, and as anyone there knows it was a tiring process. however i am going to take on finding out as much as possible about this report and hopefully have a report-back near or shortly after the downtown dfz meeting.

can you explain more... 15.Nov.2005 12:24

sakyadita

...about this Kurisu garden? What the hell are they needing community money for their private garden? They have a bad rep in the gardening industry for greed and mistreating workers. They have PLENTY of money-they should be giving some to BNA.

sakyadita, can *you* explain more (please)? 16.Nov.2005 15:43

curious

about this comment: They have a bad rep in the gardening industry for greed and mistreating workers.

i am curious to see some information/follow-up on this. i have been sorta intrigued from the sidelines on their whole deal. pointers? links? thanks!

p.s. fwiw, i wonder if there is anyone in the "garden industry" who isnt, to some degree, greedy. it seems that any operation as big as them, by nature of their size and capitalism, would be "greedy". so i am not that interested in that aspect of your comment -- more about how they treat workers. it would offer some interesting balance to some of the (seemingly) positive aspects of what they are do, e.g. theraputic gardens, organic materials, etc.


my musings on "the park" at shaver/miss 16.Nov.2005 16:23

live in the neighborhood

first off, understand that these are my personal thoughts and observations. further, that some of what i ask/propose is meant to play "devils advocate", if you will. i am trying to formulate my own take on "the park" and whats going on, so the devils advocacy is to maybe get some feedback.

what i (think i) know. the "park" and the properties around it were owned by this local character, jerry, when we moved here years ago. someone could write a short book on him, but he seemed alright. owned lots of properties. no doubt he made HUGE money selling those 4(?) properties in the "boom" going on. whatever, welcome to property-ownership and capitalism.

point is, he chose to make a "semi-public" (i.e. privately owned, but open-to-the-public) park there. i believe (?) he also paid for and installed the playground equipment there. (did he pay for it?) there have never (to my knowledge) been hours or restrictions on the park, and it is very open (e.g. very low fence, a few access points from sidewalk and alley).

this seems like a great "community resource", and i think it is. i have a reason -- a kid. i have spent a lot of time there, and my kid likes playing there.

ok, some thoughts. is this really used and loved by the community? well, by little kids, i can say sure. what i have seen in my many hours there is mostly white families. the exception to this being the roving flash-mobs of little kids from the local schools and daycare places who occasionally play there -- there are all kinds of little faces jumping around there, so thats nice.

but the community as a whole? i dont think it gets really used much. i very seldom see picnics or games being played, etc. occasionally someone is reading a book or whatever, but honestly, i see more of this kinda thing going on at unthank, and understandably (size, basketball courts, etc). in a nutshell, "the park" is basically a place where kids play and, minimally, some folks hang out (notably, spill-over from the ballroom events; e.g. send the kids out there during a wedding reception). also maybe(?) of note is that is a favorite place for local youths to break the front fence. !? whatever, kids. yeah. anyway, maybe that is some kinda other side of the coin, but i watch it happen all the time.

so it gets sold. and pretty much stays as-is well plans are in development. (i.e. as opposed to someone buying it and putting up big "do not enter" signs, i mean.) here is where i get a little devils advocate-y. fact of the matter is, anyone (rich, i mean!) coulda bought that, and a lot of other people woulda just paved over the place or stuck a stupid storefront, or something. (note: the future isnt here yet, and we dont really know what is happening, so i am giving benefit of doubt towards kurisus plans.) i hate the mentality of "lesser of two evils", but in cases of the all-powerful property owner reality of capitalism, this is the reality.

so, if a smaller or somehow different/limited (e.g. hours/access) semi-public space ends up going in there (with things like buildings and other stuff thrown into the mix), what is really lost? in my mind, a place for kids to play. thats "about it" (obviously, i will miss that aspect of it). but really, i feel that that park means a lot more as a symbol than really a day-to-day thing.

dont get me wrong -- i am sure a lot of us could come up with other great ideas of what to do with so much property that might "improve" the whole deal. but what i am getting at is what are your thoughts on what will be lost and what will be gained? are your kids going to be out a place to play, too? was there some kinda special stuff going on there that i somehow missed in my near-daily passing-by? is there some bigger evil at play here (see, for example, previous comment)? i am curious on your thoughts.

while i would love a city-repair-style anarchist garden of eden with recycled kids playground etc etc; should i be happy its not being paved over and turned into million-dollar lofts? should i like the idea of (alleged) organic plants and turning the alley into a park?

heck, i dont know. (sorry this was so long and flaky.)


thanks for commenting 16.Nov.2005 18:03

bht

hey "i live in the neighborhood", I also live in the neighborhood, and volunteer at the blackrose collective bookstore. if you want to come in and talk in depth about some of these things, that would be great.

as far as your comment goes, i guess my article isnt right on track. i am not spelling things out as well as i could. let me try better.

so, the kurisu's bought 6 lots from Jerry, the park, and the ballroom which are three lots and then the three lots behind them, currently a pink victorian and a gravel parking lot...with a reaklly nice walnut tree.

what i left out, because i wrote the article without good clear background, is that the front lot, the part that is currently a park will become a three story mixed use building. the bottom floor will be the Kurisu Corporation world headquarters, and the top two floors will be condos.

the mississippi ballroom will stay the same, probably becasue its a historical building.

the lots behind those (that face albina) will be the park. as of right now, the pink victorian will also stay, but there are rumors that it will be torn down as well. however, the gravel parking lot is what will be the japanese garden, and in that space will also be 12-16 parking spaces (i dont remember the exact number).

their garden property will most likely be limited access, as it seems its main purpose is a woo-er of potential clients, saying to them "this is what we can create for you."

and since it will need to be stunning, and spectacular and desirable, little kids probably wont be yelling because crying will get in the way of business deals. as will the sounds of fun, pleasure, youth, enjoyment.

anyway. there will be a large building and the serving of capitalist interests. that is the short answer to your question.

a few other notes: as far as I understand the playground belongs to NAYA, and they plan on taking it with them when they leave. and when jerry owned the property, he fixed the fence each time it got broken. i dont think the kurisu's have ever fixed it.

New landuse co-chair has no history in community ? 17.Nov.2005 08:13

Where's the community elders ?

I find it both really interesting and at the same time worrying, that a person who does not live in the Boise community,has just arrived from chicago,and rents temporary housing in SW,not the Boise Neighborhood, and only relationship to this community is that he and 2 other partners,who also have no history in the Boise community,except they all just purchased a big swath of land at 4138 N.Mississippi Ave, which right now has on it a warehouse space,an empty lot,which is,south, behind the Monsoon Thai restaurant and laundromat,,the warehouse south of that and from what I have been told,a hope to also aquire the house which is located south of the warehouse,next to the habitat for humanity housing,which will be demolished to make way for their new develoment,condos and storefront, I'm waiting for the "it;s going to be the greenest building in Portland",seems to be the new in word amongst urban developers.
With no history in the struggles this community has gone or is going through, and attending his first meeting,he has been elected to the landuse co-chair. Does anyone else find this troubling ?...

If you would like to meet him & his partners and here there plans for the propose Mississippi avenue lofts,mixed use development locatted at 4138 N.Mississip[pi Ave, they are holding a community meeting this Sat...

Mississippi Avenue Lofts:community Meeting.

The development team for the proposed Mississippi Avenue lofts mixed use development located at 4138 N.Mississippi Avenue would like to invite residents of the Boise elliott neighborhood and members of the business community to join us for an informal discussion of the project.

This is your chance to meet with the developers and architects and provide your comments as they discuss their goals to enhance the image of the historic Mississippi district and provide a positive impact on the community.

Mississippi ballroom-833 North Shaver Street

Saturday November 19th,2005, from 3 pm till 4 pm.

Please keep in mind this is one of 5 large mixed use,condo/storefront developments that are going to have an extreme impact on our community.I urge concerned community members to attend this community meeting.

Mississippi Haus 17.Nov.2005 11:02

Former Boise Member

It's funny. For all the years I've listened to members of the Mississippi Haus going on and on about gentrification and how it affects the community, this entirly white owned house of members of people who(out side of 1) have lived in the community for less than three years open their own white owned business without a regard for the community. Unless you count their own self satisfaction.

I guess if you call it a collective it doesn't count? Hypocrisy and crappy behaviour are flowing from all sides of this issue. Just because one believes themselves to be politically right doesn't exclude one from looking at how they themselves are a part of gentrification...perhaps a larger part as early white "poor" are often the first wave, making an area appealing for the greedy corporations that are later to be railed against.

above 2 posts 17.Nov.2005 12:25

j

first, about the land-use co-chair thing: is there some kinda "conflict of interest" clause about this? i find it hard to believe that someone wanting to do some major development in an area can chair its land-use board. thats nuts. anyway, i will hope to hear more about this whole issue.

about the co-op criticism. i have (once before) tried to address the extremely complicated issue of "gentrification" on indymedia, and, frankly, i dont know why i am (again) wasting my time. its such a knee-jerk thing for some activists and easy bait for trolls (whom i may be replying to). but i will try to say this in one paragraph:

gentrification is about class and money (income, etc), not race. race, it is TRUE, plays a part in these two things (especially in portland). but to simplify the convoluted topic that is "gentrification" down to "you are white" is not only absurd, but frankly ignorant. if POOR or LOWER-CLASS people improve a neighborhood, it is NOT (by definition) gentrification. it may LEAD to gentrification, but so many things do, regardless of who is doing it. (example: grandfathers ribs [black-owned business] LEAD to gentrification by the same argument.) in short, do not fall for the tried and true tactic used by those in power, of divide and conquer ... gentrification is first about class/income and the struggle of the lower end of that against capitalistic activity due to real estate and property ownership. do everyone a favor and dont inject RACE into that as an automatic delineation.


Unclear of this Article message, but I'd like to comment 31.Jan.2006 16:09

anonymous

It amazes me that somehow African-Americans have been left out of this Boise - Mississippi Street growth, not everyone in this neightborhood are of low class poor citizens. But we have become are left out and afraid to speak out. I yet personally believe that all whites had a meeting and decided to take over the neighborhood, hey right there on Mississippi was once a restaurant that read Whites-Only, that sure won't be happening. I think minorities need to step up and speak out, let's bombard these meetings and speak our opinoins, but the truth is that most are afraid or just think that their opinion just doesn't matter any way. No one of these new restaraunts, video stores, etc. pertain to minorities and even though the block looks prettier, minorities feel as though they're trying to be kicked out and the truth is, we are!, but it is trying to be done a more different note, let's piss them off and make them leave, but if their like me, the more they build, the longer I stay and I just hope that we all feel this way!

Unclear of this Article message, but I'd like to comment 31.Jan.2006 16:11

anonymous

It amazes me that somehow African-Americans have been left out of this Boise - Mississippi Street growth, not everyone in this neightborhood are of low class poor citizens. But we have become are left out and afraid to speak out. I yet personally believe that all whites had a meeting and decided to take over the neighborhood, hey right there on Mississippi was once a restaurant that read Whites-Only, that sure won't be happening. I think minorities need to step up and speak out, let's bombard these meetings and speak our opinoins, but the truth is that most are afraid or just think that their opinion just doesn't matter any way. No one of these new restaraunts, video stores, etc. pertain to minorities and even though the block looks prettier, minorities feel as though they're trying to be kicked out and the truth is, we are!, but it is trying to be done a more different note, let's piss them off and make them leave, but if their like me, the more they build, the longer I stay and I just hope that we all feel this way!