portland independent media center  
images audio video
composted article reposts united states

human & civil rights | imperialism & war | katrina aftermath

EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE FOUND ON FAILED LEVEE DEBRIS!

 http://www.halturnershow.com/DiversFindExplosiveResidueOnRupturedLevy.html
New Orleans, LA -- Divers inspecting the
ruptured
levee walls surrounding New Orleans found
something
that piqued their interest: Burn marks on
underwater
debris chunks from the broken levee wall!

One diver, a member of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, saw the burn marks and knew
immediately
what caused them. When he surfaced and showed the
evidence to his superior, the on-site Coordinator
for
FEMA stepped-in and said "You are not here to
conduct
an investigation as to why this rupture occurred,
but
only to determine how best to close it." The
FEMA
coordinator then threw the evidence back into the
water and said "You will tell no one about this."

At that point, the diver went back down to do
more
inspection of the levee. On the second dive, he
secreted a small chunk of the debris inside his
wet
suit and later arranged for it to be sent to
trusted
military friends at a The U.S. Army Forensic
Laboratory at Fort Gillem, Georgia for testing.

According to well placed sources, a military
forensic
specialist determined the burn marks on the
cement
chunks did, in fact, come from high explosives.
The
source, speaking on condition of anonymity said
"We
found traces of boron-enhanced fluoronitramino
explosives as well as PBXN-111 embedded in the
debris.
This would indicate at least two separate types
of
explosive devices."

The levee ruptures in New Orleans did not take
place
during Hurricane Katrina, but rather a day after
the
hurricane struck. Several residents of New
Orleans
and many Emergency Workers reported hearing what
sounded like large, muffled explosions from the
area
of the levee, but those were initially discounted
as
gas explosions from homes with leaking gas lines.

If these allegations prove true, the ruptured
levee
which flooded New Orleans was a deliberate act of
mass
destruction perpetrated by someone with access to
military-grade UNDERWATER high explosives.

More details as they become available . . . . .

> >EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE FOUND ON FAILED
> >LEVEE DEBRIS!
> >Ruptured New Orleans Levee had help failing
> >
> >By: Hal Turner
> >September 9, 2005
> >3:36 PM EDT
> >
> >New Orleans, LA -- Divers inspecting the
ruptured
> levee walls
> >surrounding New Orleans found something that
piqued
> their
> >interest: Burn marks on underwater debris
chunks
> from the
> >broken levee wall!
> >
> >One diver, a member of the U.S. Army Corps of
> Engineers, saw
> >the burn marks and knew immediately what
caused
> them. He
> >secreted a small chunk of the cement inside
his
> diving suit
> >and later arranged for it to be sent to
trusted
> military
> >friends at a The U.S. Army Forensic Laboratory
at
> Fort Gillem,
> >Georgia for testing.
> >
> >According to well placed sources, a military
> forensic
> >specialist determined the burn marks on the
cement
> chunks
> >did, in fact, come from high explosives.
The
> source,
> >speaking on condition of anonymity said "We
found
> traces of
> >boron-enhanced fluoronitramino explosives as
well
> as PBXN-111.
> >This would indicate at least two separate
types of
> explosive
> >devices."
> >
> >The levee ruptures in New Orleans did not take
> place during
> >Hurricane Katrina, but rather a day after the
> hurricane
> >struck. Several residents of New Orleans and
many
> Emergency
> >Workers reported hearing what sounded like
large,
> muffled
> >explosions from the area of the levee, but
those
> were
> >initially discounted as gas explosions from
homes
> with leaking
> >gas lines.
> >
> >If these allegations prove true, the ruptured
levee
> which
> >flooded New Orleans was a deliberate act of
mass
> destruction
> >perpetrated by someone with access to
military-
> grade
> >UNDERWATER high explosives.
> >
> >More details as they become available . . . .

Very interesting! 12.Sep.2005 17:05

Tony Blair's dog

Looking forward to more information.

citations? 12.Sep.2005 17:32

jason

This is a potentially huge story, but I must assume it's disinformation without any sourcing or citation. The writer doesn't even explain how they came upon this information. Were they at the scene? That would explain the direct quotes, but they don't mention it.

I think this is crap, probably put out by BushCo to make thier critics look like fools.

hal turner 12.Sep.2005 17:35

is psycho

halturnershow.com

he's a nutcase

hal is wingnut at best 15.Sep.2005 22:52

but...

there were quite a number of independent, ground-level reports of explosions...and this wouldn't be the first time around for blowing out the levees.

verbal diahria 30.Sep.2005 08:28

neil rich

where do u get this stuff from. sounds like u luv conspiracy ideas. real garbage if you ask me.