portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary united states

technology

String Theory

"By the principle of relativity, there is no way for an observer on the train of planet earth to detect any influence on the train's motion. If the clock of an individual were to fall out of synchronization, this would be a noticeable influence."
"By the principle of relativity, there is no way for an observer on the train of planet earth to detect any influence on the train's motion. If the clock of an individual were to fall out of synchronization, this would be a noticeable influence."

Richard was the chief scientist for the Mariner IV being run by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Science is not always glamorous and the boys were enjoying the attention of the press. That is, except for Murray. He was getting no data. Richard felt sorry for him, and on a whim said, "Boys, where's Mars in relation to the JPL now?" Richard pointed in the direction of Mars and uttered an imprecation. "Okay, our telemetry packets arrive every fifteen minutes. Murray's data for microsatellite particles should change from zero's to one's." Sure enough, right on schedule, the data changed. Murray grinned like a little kid. Richard knew that as they approached the gravity well of Mars, there would be an expected increase.
Two days later, the assistant project manager was seen to be taking taped measurements in the shape of a rectangle around Richard's head. The other scientists grinned at these antics. Richard looked up from an analysis, "What's up, guys?"
Straight-faced, the assistant said, "Engineering is making a lead box for your head. We don't want anymore Heisenberg effects (observer bias on a running experiment)."
Richard was in his seventies, reminiscing about his glory days. "Funny thing," he admitted, "that wasn't the only time on the project it happened. The press had left and Mariner was past Mars. We had to run the experiments a little longer, but the only thing, that could possibly affect the data, was a solar flare. To save money, the air conditioning was set at a minimum, and guys were drowsing at their stations. 'Hey Murray, where's the sun in relation to the JPL?' Murray pointed. I uttered an imprecation, and damn if the telemetry data didn't shift fifteen minutes later. We all had a good laugh over that one."
About the same time Richard was relating this story, the Discovery Space shuttle blew up on re-entry right over Houston Mission control. The cause was determined to be foam insulation striking a wing and a crucial piece of heat resistant tile falling off near the landing gear. It was a national tragedy. Several years later, and a couple of billion dollars in repair and analysis, the shuttle program was ready to fly again.
With manifold more recording devices set to monitor the launch, and eerie scenario developed. Again a piece of foam insulation fell off the fuel tank and a small piece of tile chipped near the landing gear. Commonsense dictated that here was a case for Richard Feynman who solved the O-ring mystery. Feynman was dead - died of cancer. Nobody could figure out why there were such similarities. Fortunately, the re-entry did not end up in disaster, but with the Iraq war and financial mismanagement by the Bush administration, it still spelled the end for NASA's big research programs.
For most folks, there was no connection between these random events. Brian Greene was a string theory physicist. He saw the connection through a strange quark of nature. Early chaos mathematician, Konrad Lorenz, had proposed 'the butterfly effect'. A seemingly random event could have immense perturbations within the cosmic cycle. Brian knew this to be true from personal experience, not that he would admit it to anyone. He understood by the principle of relativity that there was no way for an observer on the train of planet earth to detect any influence on the train's motion. If the clock of an individual were to fall out of synchronization with the Fort Collin's Atomic clock, this would be a noticeable influence.
Outlaw biochemist, Rupert Sheldrake, had stated, "Fractal means there's a resonance across scales. This harmony, this habit of a space/time pattern is just dependent upon some sort of morphic field."
Brian knew that it was far more than that. In this case, he knew he had been part of the shuttle's second failure. James Clerk Maxwell had established that visible light is nothing but a particular kind of electromagnetic wave. German researcher, Fritz Popp, had established that DNA emits biophotons with a characteristic electromagnetic signature. Couple that with 7 billion magnetite crystals in the human brain, and there were the makings for a human 'butterfly effect'. Brian had frequently stated that, "the only reason the electromagnetic force does not completely overwhelm gravity in the world around us is that most things are composed of an equal amount of positive and negative electric charges, whose forces cancel each other out."
He knew he was hedging and had to admit the truth, at least to himself. At the time of the shuttle launch, Brian had been contemplating ditching his wife of twenty-five years. A truck on the highway had crashed into his security fence at that very moment. It awakened him to the disastrous consequences to himself and others if he pursued that course.
Funny thing was the next morning. He looked at his digital watch; it had changed by five minutes from the Atomic clock on his wall, automatically reset by satellite at regular intervals. There was nothing wrong with battery in his watch. Brian KNEW 'the butterfly effect' was real.
you just gotta BELIEVE 29.Jul.2005 22:24

remember, everything you KNOW must be true

I just KNOW this is new age bullshit.

By the way, the second re-entry described above hasn't happened yet.

no no no... you got it all wrong 30.Jul.2005 05:08

Dr. A. Bozoron

Eatherwind reality.
All you know is what you see. It can be felt and remembered.
Ripples across the water, your life being the convergence of all the other ripples created into this sea of life. We only see the three dimensions of the ripples with our passage through time. We never see the structure of the movement through this media as a place we can look at by shifting our awareness across, over or under the surface of our three dimensional life. Sound familiar? Of course it does. Light speed is Zero velocity in an omnidirectional expanding hyper dimensional universe. There are no limits.
Personally I believe the light splitting experiment was not a valid refutation of the eatherwind due to the, in my opinion, narrow parameters of conclusions from the results. Do a search engine query on Zero Point Energy.

hmm 30.Jul.2005 10:03

lokal

one of my biggest criticisms of the Neocons is that they have abandoned the concept that, in a sane and just society, evidence must be the basis of all action.

for example, they want to arrest people without warrent and want to try them as guilty until proven innocent.

also, they view science (cumulative evidence) as something that should be ignored when it suggests problems with the behavior of the corporate elite.


why is it then that so many of us in the left are equally willing to abandon evidence in forming a perspective of the world?

Why are so many theories based on rumor, word of mouth, and faith?

I use the following question when avaluating any idea:
"if this kind of evidence was used to convict me of a crime in a court of law, would i be living in a just society?"
a good example is dousing. i an accept that maybe people have the ability to search for things using intuative measures of "energy lines" the only issue is that observed dousing is usually no better then random. so, if i was on trial for a murder and a douser comes up to the stand and says, "when i asked my dousing rod, it said that he is a murderer" how would YOU feel about this kind of evidence being used?

I'm serious, you CAN'T hold the blief that one is "Innosent until proven guilty" and that things without evidence like zero-point exist. holding to these beleifs is to give in to fanatacism dogma unscience.

There is no evidence that zero-point energy is anything. So conveinient that it isn't being "allowed to come out."
There is, however, some evidence to the contrary.
For example, if Zero-point energy was available and the government is aware of it, i would assume the following results:
1. The governemnt would make use of it (even if it was in secret.) As all power structures have always aligned themselves with what will provide the most control over the flow of resources.
2. Having an unlimited supply of energy, the level of the government's activities, weaponry, technology etc would also grow exponentionally.

however, the power of the united states is flimsy at best. They are not winning war in afganistan or iraq, their resources are low, their rations are low, they are not able to keep their weapons and vehicles stocked up. if they had access to zero-point energy, there would be no question as to WHO would win the war.

Did you just make this up? 30.Jul.2005 16:08

What about some citations?

Brian Green is an excellent writer, (author of The Elegant Universe) and I wonder how he would feel about this posting.

I mean, maybe the whole thing is true, but you provide no citations, no references, and no source for your information.

There may be something in what you say, but you shouldn't use real people as examples without some supporting information, it's sloppy, and makes others doubt you.

And in the mean time, anyone in the universe who has respect for science would have to assume that there was a problem with the watch--Occam's Razor to the Rescue!