House Passes Bill Banninng Flag Burning
author: anti-imperialist
|
The US House of Representatives approved a constitutional ammendment today, giving congress the power to ban the desecration of the flag. Currently, the bill has a distinct chance of passing the Senate as well, due to the republican gain in the last election. It then would move to states for ratification within the next seven years, and would permanently amend the US constitution.
|
"Ask the men and women who stood on top of the Trade Center," remarked Rep. Randy Cunningham, (R-Calif.) "Ask them and they will tell you: pass this amendment."
The basis of the sentiments behind this bill are the same sentiments that justify the destruction of civil liberties in favor of "security" and the overt racism of imperialist war in the name of "regime change for democracy". We are living in a time of intense propaganda, where words and other symbols have taken on more and more power and (often illusory) meaning in the interest of centralizing power for the Bush administration and its corporate allies. One still very potent symbol is that of 9-11. It is no accident that Rep. Cunningham used it, invoking fear, to sell this anti-flag burning amendment. 9-11 is spoken of with reverence only, because to investigate the event as a complex and military event is to open the door to a discussion of US imperialism and as Ward Churchill has termed, "roosting chickens".
Do you remember the intense fervor with which the symbol of the US flag was tied to the symbol of the event of 9-11, how every American was expected to display a flag at the front door, and politicians donned little pins and ribbons to display their "patriotism"? This was a genius move by whichever political thinktank designed it. For not only did the flag become a method of intense social control (fostering racism, xenophobia, and anti-muslim violence) but it came to define "American" as a specific brand of Bush loving, rightwing fundamentalist, "morally" militaristic, manifest destiny bullshit that was forced down the throats of everyone who didn't take to it willingly.
Those who oppose any of this have become illegitimate "Americans" or even "un- American". The flag has been a sugar-coated pill of facism, introducing and controlling the public mind into compliance using a familiar face to mask intentions that are ugly.
So what do people do when symbols are fostering their oppression? Perhaps they should fight back. Flag burning has gotten pretty popular, expressing that many people see the flag as ALREADY desicrated, soaked in blood and greed, and that it is cleansing to destroy the symbol.
Other dissenters have argued in favor of "reclaiming the flag". During the house proceedings, Rep. Jerrold Nadler said, "If the flag needs protection at all, it needs protection from members of Congress who value the symbol more than the freedoms that the flag represents." While he is arguing for free speech, he is reaffirming the power of the flag. He does not seem to see that the flag in his head (perhaps the one he pledged alliegence to in school)is not and never has been pure sugar coating. It is, and always has been the vehicle for social norms that have committed genocide countless times, mass produce poverty, stripped the earth of vital resources, and created the most imperialist nation on the face of the planet.
The current amendment reads "the congress shall have the power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States." This current anti-flag burning bill is in direct confrontation with the 1989 Supreme Court Decision that ruled that flag burning is protected under our constitutional right to free speech. The 1989 court decision came out of the context of the Vietnam War and resistance to the draft. The resistance was strong enough that it threw a wrench in the politics of drafting military "recruits", and also pushed the supreme court into upholding free speech. Since 9-11, resistance to the Federal Government's activities has been dismantled piece by piece, and we stand in the midst of losing whatever protections have been made by reformist struggles in the past.
Where is our resistance now? Are reformist pursuits futile now that the faction in power has defined the structures, symbols and language of our culture into a totalitarian monologue? What are our options, and who will burn the flag after it is banned? Who will resist a draft if it is levied soon? Does anyone even care about more than their own coveted symbols anymore? Has reality gone out the window? I'd like a moment of silence in remembrance of all the kids starving, people bleeding to death, dying of corporate pollution diseases, and dispalced off their homelands by US interests who exist in the world RIGHT NOW. It's high time to remember that these symbols that bind us and in many cases blind us are worthless in comparison to real, actual, breathing life. It's time to fight for what counts.
The amendment is H.J. Res 10.
|
add a comment on this article
add a comment on this article
|
I'm thinking of a public flag-burning to protest the imperial war--but with a twist: it would be pumped up as a big thing, I could bring big flags, then whip out a tiny birthday-cake flag and burn that. Heh.