portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary united states

corporate dominance | imperialism & war | political theory

Nixons Watergate, JFKs Murder: Connecting the Dots!

Richard Nixon was forced to resign because of Watergate and the "feeding frenzy" over it initiated by the Washington Post. Yet, this same Post has been silent about the Iraqi-related lies of George W. Bush! Why did the Post ignore the CIA connections to Watergate? Did a Shadow Government bring Nixon down because of his peace overtures to Vietnam and the Soviet Union?
The White House
The White House
Richard M. Nixon won the 1972 presidential election by a massive landslide of votes. He carried 49 of the 50 states. His opponent, Sen. George McGovern, failed to carry even his home state of South Dakota. Only faithful Massachusetts stayed in the Democratic column. It was an embarrassing blow! Yet, incredibly, by Aug. 8, 1974, Nixon was forced to resign from the office of the presidency as a result of the Watergate scandal! (1)

Watergate was a grand comic opera that Nixon had helped to cover up at the urging of White House sleaze bags. Some of them are strongly suspected of having had a personal interest in the break-in that they wanted to keep from the public eye. (2) Even G. Gordon Liddy, an organizer of the break-in on June 17, 1972, of the Democratic Party headquarters at the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C., couldn't figure out the value of that insane enterprise. The CIA, thanks to one of its operatives, the late E. Howard Hunt, was also directly involved in the Watergate crime. Come to think about it, what exactly was the CIA's interest in Watergate? Why wasn't this question ever addressed by the Washington Post? There is definitely something here way beyond Nixon's political ambitions. (3)

There isn't any doubt, that the country was seriously destabilized by the political crisis surrounding Nixon's resignation. A personally flawed man, Nixon was his own worst enemy. He was a master of "dirty tricks." One might say that God's great law of Karma finally caught up with him. He was also a first class liar and a mean-spirited man. I'm writing this piece not to minimize Nixon's role in Watergate, but only to get readers to look behind the Controlled Media's spin on it. Recent disclosures indicate that W. Mark Felt, the then-No. 2 man at the FBI, was "Deep Throat." Felt now claims, after lying about it for over 30 years, that he was "the" source for Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of the Post. They, along with Federal Judge John Sirica who presided over the burglary case, broke the Watergate story. The reporters agree Felt was their source. Well, he may have been "a source," but was he the "only" one? Was he really the "primary" source? Or, was "Deep Throat" a composite of sources? Is the Post again deliberately misdirecting us away from key figures, at the then-Nixon White House, who may have been "CIA plants," and who had agendas of their own with respect to Watergate? (3)

Consider this: If there is a scandal at a local City Hall in any town in America, are the people who are in the know about that scandal going to be the local cops investigating the affair? Isn't it more probably true than not, that the real authorities about what truly happened at City Hall will come from someone who worked in the highest echelon of offices there?

Question: "Why would the Establishment of that day want to get rid of Nixon over a burglary?" It doesn't make any sense! Nixon was its man and it had just spent tons of money getting him elected to a second term. The Post's version of what happened has huge holes in it. Meanwhile, as I write, President George W. Bush has lied us into an unjust, costly and deadly war with Iraq, with no end in sight to that conflict. Yet, the Post is maintaining a strict vow of silence about that. Why isn't it howling for Bush's Impeachment? This is the same stealth-like position that it took when President Ronald Reagan was lying his a.. off about Contragate. The Post also didn't dare to disturb the demented Reagan as he was going about his anti-American plot of repealing the progressive gains of "FDR's New Deal." This is the same rotten scheme that Bush, again without any opposition from the Post, is finishing off. Who is watching the store? Not the self-glorifying Post, that's for sure.

There are more questions. It's beyond dispute that Woodward is a fine writer, but how did he get a job at the Post as a reporter with so little experience? He wrote for one year for a small newspaper in Montgomery Co., MD, covering mostly boring local items. Then, he was hired by the Post's Metro Editor, Harry Rosenfeld. Earlier, Woodward was a Lt. in the U.S. Navy, whose duties took him to the White House, where he claims he met Felt, in 1970, for the first time. Did he also meet Alexander Haig, Henry Kissinger or E. Howard Hunt there? What exactly were his duties in the Navy? He doesn't tell us. As for Bernstein, Watergate was his first and last dubious claim to fame. When I see him on TV babbling about some issue, I wonder: "Could this character get a job today as a taxicab driver in Washington, D.C.?" As for Woodward's account of his relationship with Felt, it sounds shaky, artificial and contrived to me. It doesn't pass the smell test. I don't believe him! (4) Did Woodward have a journalistic conflict of interest in covering Watergate because of his past White House and intelligence communities connections?

Based on all of the above, I believe that the thing that we call, "The Establishment," isn't the real power in the land! It's mostly a front, like that over-hyped "Wizard of Oz," was proven to be in the famous novel by L. Frank Baum. (5) I suspect that the Establishment didn't get rid of Nixon, but a powerful "Shadow Government" did! This clique, acting behind the scenes, cleverly orchestrated the "feeding frenzy" over Watergate. The Post, either consciously or unconsciously, was a part of that gambit. The "Shadow Government" is made up of many parts, some foreign based. (6) In my opinion, Nixon's fall from power greatly increased the influence of one of that ilk - the Military-Industrial Complex - the same one that President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us about in his Farewell Address. (7)

What motives could the Military-Industrial Complex have do it? According to author Peter Dale Scott, this group got deeply concerned when Nixon began "secret negotiations with Hanoi for disengagement from Vietnam." These worries were all "significantly advanced by his May, 1972 visit to Moscow, where he signed the first Strategic Arms Limitation Agreement." (8) If Nixon got the boot, it would surely be better for those in the business of perpetual war-making. And, it goes without saying that is why, today, the Military-Industrial Complex just loves Bush! He is the Mother of all War Hawks and a fanatical "Free Trader," which pleases the Globalist intriguers, also. (6)

What else was Nixon intending to do in his last term in office that so spooked the gangster-like Shadow Government? Did Nixon and his top aide, the late Bob Haldeman, take those secrets to the grave? Or, are Nixon's plans on those White House tapes waiting for some scholar to discover them? (9) Author Scott believes, "Dishonesty, manipulation, and even self-deception are widespread in our nominal political democracy...A deep political analysis of [it] will lead to not a few bad people," he asserts, "but to the institutional and parapolitical arrangements which constitute the way we are systematically governed. The conspiracies I see as operative, in other words, are part of our political structure, not exceptions to it." (8)

Keep in mind that one of the salient points that Scott makes in, "Deep Politics and the Death of JFK," and in his other brilliant tomes, is that there are ongoing incestuous, insidious and covert relationships existing between important elements of the federal government, the Mob, the CIA, the FBI, Drug Cartels, the Controlled Media, Big Business, Intelligence agencies and corrupt politicians. "A deep political system," Scott argues, "is one where the processes openly acknowledged are not always securely in control, precisely because of their accommodation to unsanctioned sources of violence, through arrangements not openly acknowledged and reviewed." (8)

Finally, Nixon, after Watergate and his resignation, spent his senior years writing his memoirs. He was a really lucky man! The time before that, when the Shadow Government connivers wanted a president put out of the way, it manipulated him into taking a trip to Dallas, Texas, and to riding in a convertible, with its top down, through the town. That man was John Fitzgerald Kennedy and the fateful date was Nov. 22, 1963! Kennedy was murdered only "two days after his announcement of detailed plans for a disengagement from Vietnam." There are a lot of dots between the criminal coups that removed JFK and Nixon from power. Someday, the American people are going to wake up and connect those dots! (8)

Notes:

1.  http://www.watergate.info/.
2. "Silent Coup: The Removal of a President," by Len Colodny and Robert Gettlin.
3. "Secret Agenda: Watergate, Deep Throat and the CIA," by Jim Hougan.
4. "How Mark Felt Became 'Deep Throat,'" by Bob Woodward.
5. "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz," by L. Frank Baum.
6. "Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300," by Dr. John Coleman.
7.  http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html.
8. "Deep Politics and the Death of JFK," by Peter Dale Scott.
9.  http://www.nixon.archives.gov/news/deepthroat.html

William Hughes 2005

William Hughes is the author of "Saying 'No' to the War Party" (IUniverse, Inc.). He can be reached at  liamhughes@comcast.net.

homepage: homepage: http://home.comcast.net/~liamhughes/

Maybe Nixon wasn't a crook 04.Jun.2005 06:35

Freedom Fighters

Maybe his concern with knowing what was going on in the White House stemmed from learning that
some people in the administration were having criminal dealings going on behind the stage?....Just a thought....

Follow the weenies.. 04.Jun.2005 12:12

me

If you grew up during that time, you would know what happened.


Nixon had been a congressman and made a name for himself as a rabid anti-communist in the 1950s.

The media at that time had many "pink-weenies" embedded within the industry who hated Nixon.

Once he became Vice-President under Eisenhower he was a political threat and the face of a movement that these journalists didn't want.

When as VP he ran against Kennedy the media felt for many reasons it didn't want him as President.

During the now famous TV debate between JFK and Nixon, RFK had paid the janitors to crank up the heat in the building where the debate was being aired so Nixon would sweat. (normal political tricks, and loyalty to his brother JFK).

However, before the debate Dan Rather of CBS told the Nixon people that the background set would be dark so Nixon should wear a light colored suit when in fact the background set was very light and Nixon's light suit helped distort his appearance (remember, these were old black and white TVs) To be fair Nixon refused to put any makeup on because he felt it wasn't a masculine think to do.

He lost in what has been proven as vote fraud (Texas and Chicago Illinois) that made the Florida 2000 election look mild.

After JFK's and RFK's death many felt that the dreams of JFK should continue, but had no interest in letting Nixon take the credit for it.

If you look at the troop strength in Vietnam in 1968 when Nixon took office he began a pullout, but it was a low-key pullout. Check the numbers and you will see a steady decrease in troops, this appeared as a threat to many.

When the Watergate incident became public the press really hammered Nixon, day after day, week after week. It was time for all of those "Pink-weenies" to take down their old nemesis.

Felt (deepthroat) could have gone to a grand jury, or he could have talked with Nixon and told him if you don't go public with this, I will.

Perhaps he didn't want to disclose how he got the information In the first place (J. Edgar Hoover wire tapes everyplace). If you notice, nobody even this past week mentions how he knew all of this.

senile 91 year old Felt just latest coverup of CIA-banker-Bush coup 04.Jun.2005 21:53

Deep Toad

continued from Deep Toad comments here:
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/318539.shtml

all that about Rockefeller is angle one, this is another second angle which of course connects back to Rockefeller anyway:




----------------------------------

Jim Hougan, co-author "Silent Coup: The Removal of a President "(1992)
believes Felt was badgered into playing this role by family and friends.
Felt is 91 years old, and counting. A reporter who recently interviewed
him found the interview an incoherent waste of time, and killed his own
story.

According to Houghton, Felt wrote a book about his career in the FBI. In
it, he goes out of the way to say that he met Woodward on a single
occasion. This was in Felt's FBI office, and the upshot of it was that
Felt told Woodward that he would not cooperate with him in his pursuit of
"Watergate."

Houghton says no one in or around the Nixon White House was in a position
to know all of the things that Throat is alleged to have told Woodward.
For example, Felt had no way of knowing about the 18-and-a-half minute gap
in Rosemary Woods' tape. This strongly suggests that Throat was a
composite.

"What we have here, then, is the sad spectacle of an old man being
manipulated," says Houghton. "The only person who meets [the Deep Throat]
criterion, to my knowledge, is Robert Bennett. Now one of the most
powerful men in the U.S. Senate, Bennett was President of the Robert R.
Mullen Company in 1972-3. This was the CIA front for which Howard Hunt
worked."

Houghton obtained a memo under the Freedom of Information Act in which
Bennett admits he is briefing Bob Woodward. "Woodward's gratefulness was
manifest in the way he kept the CIA, in general, and the Robert R. Mullen
Company, in particular, out of his stories."

----------------------------------




'Deep Throated' Media
Swallow Banker Lies
Watergate Coup d'Etat
By Henry Makow, PhD
6-4-5


In their exclusive clubs, central bankers and their CIA-CFR minions are
toasting the gullibility of the American public and having a good laugh.
While portraying Watergate as a victory for press freedom and democracy,
again they made a mockery out of both.

Last week, they rolled out a senile man of 91, former FBI Deputy Director
Mark Felt, and announced that he was the infamous "Deep Throat."

Ex-Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein admitted Felt
provided clues that led to the 1974 impeachment of Richard Nixon for the
Watergate burglary and obstruction of justice.

Watergate was a coup d'etat. Felt's true role is to deflect attention from
the CIA. The family of central banker Eugene Meyer owns The Washington
Post, which has long established ties to the CIA.

Nixon's Watergate missteps were an excuse to remove a popular President
who had just won a landslide victory and had become a threat to central
banker hegemony. [despite being sponsored, he was becoming very
anti-corporatists, even froze fuel oil prices and was about to start
nationally required land use planning, which would have pretty much
stopped the world of wasteland inefficient sprawl in present 2005--though
that would have challenged the real estate moguls.]

According to Seymour Hersh, in an article entitled "The Pardon," (Atlantic
Monthly, Aug. 1983, p.69) a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recalled
that on Dec. 22, 1973, Nixon tried to get military support to resist the
"eastern elite."

"He kept on referring to the fact that he may be the last hope, [that] the
eastern elite was out to get him. He kept saying, "This is our last and
best hope. The last chance to resist the fascists [of the Left]." (William
T. Still, New World Order, Ancient Plan of Secret Societies, p. 12)

According to Webster Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin (The Unauthorized
Biography of George Bush): "The reason the Watergate scandal escalated
into the overthrow of Nixon has to do with the international monetary
crisis of those years, and with Nixon's inability to manage the collapse
of the Bretton Woods system and the US dollar in a way satisfactory to the
Anglo-American financial elite...

"Broadly speaking, Watergate was a coup d'etat which was instrumental in
laying the basis for the specific new type of authoritarian-totalitarian
regime which now rules the United States. The purpose of the coup was to
rearrange the dominant institutions of the US government so as to enhance
their ability to carry out policies agreeable to the increasingly urgent
dictates of the British [re. Rothschild] -dominated Morgan-
Rockefeller-Mellon-Harriman financier faction."

href=" http://www.tarpley.net/bush12.htm

A LITTLE HISTORY

As I have said, sham democracy is the bankers' preferred method of social
control. They groom the candidates, own the media and pay the talking
heads. If an elected official gets silly notions about defending the
national interest, they arrange a plane cash or an impeachment.

Until 1972, Richard Nixon had been a compliant pawn of the
Rothschild-Rockefeller cabal. In 1947, he answered an ad placed by some
powerful businessmen looking for someone to run for Congress. The
advertiser was none other than Prescott Bush, grandfather of Dubya, and a
partner in Rothschild banking asset Brown Brothers Harriman. [This leaves
out that he was working with the CIA/Army intelligence spy frameworks that
were very pro-fascist themselves in WWII. Worked with Kissinger.]

After his humiliating defeat to California Governor Pat Brown in 1962,
Nixon worked for John Mitchell, Nelson Rockefeller's personal attorney and
lived rent-free in a posh apartment owned by Nelson Rockefeller. His job
was to become President in 1968 when, to the consternation of his
conservative supporters, he pursued Rockefeller's "internationalist"
polices.

[However,] The bankers pulled the plug on Nixon because he was becoming
unmanageable. [and working on his own agendas, regardless of what
we think of them. That was the point.] Already before 1972, Nixon is heard
on tape agreeing with Billy Graham that something had to be done about the
"Jewish stranglehold" on the mass media or the "country will go down the
drain." He also referred to elite-party-place Bohemian Grove as "the most
faggy goddamn thing I've ever seen".

JIM HOUGAN WEIGHS IN

Jim Hougan, co-author "Silent Coup: The Removal of a President "(1992)
believes Felt was badgered into playing this role by family and friends.
Felt is 91 years old, and counting. A reporter who recently interviewed
him found the interview an incoherent waste of time, and killed his own
story.

According to Houghton, Felt wrote a book about his career in the FBI. In
it, he goes out of the way to say that he met Woodward on a single
occasion. This was in Felt's FBI office, and the upshot of it was that
Felt told Woodward that he would not cooperate with him in his pursuit of
"Watergate."

Houghton says no one in or around the Nixon White House was in a position
to know all of the things that Throat is alleged to have told Woodward.
For example, Felt had no way of knowing about the 18-and-a-half minute gap
in Rosemary Woods' tape. This strongly suggests that Throat was a
composite.

"What we have here, then, is the sad spectacle of an old man being
manipulated," says Houghton. "The only person who meets [the Deep Throat]
criterion, to my knowledge, is Robert Bennett. Now one of the most
powerful men in the U.S. Senate, Bennett was President of the Robert R.
Mullen Company in 1972-3. This was the CIA front for which Howard Hunt
worked."

Houghton obtained a memo under the Freedom of Information Act in which
Bennett admits he is briefing Bob Woodward. "Woodward's gratefulness was
manifest in the way he kept the CIA, in general, and the Robert R. Mullen
Company, in particular, out of his stories."

 http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/ (scroll down)

CONCLUSION

If we count the Kennedy Assasination, the impeachment of Richard Nixon was
the second coup d'etat by the central bankers in a dozen years. They were
steps leading to their attack on the World Trade Centre and the inception
of the repressive Patriot Act.

Last week, the "free press" earned the title "Deep Throat" by
demonstrating that, for a small price, it would swallow anything.

The carefully staged event illustrates how far it has gone from being
guardian of the public interest to being an instrument of mass deception
and social control. In the New World Order, traitors like Bob Woodward and
Mark Felt are "heroes" while our defenders like Richard Nixon are defamed.

George Orwell famously said, "He who controls the past controls the
future." If the best values of Western Civilization are to survive,
historical truth clearly is something we must struggle to uphold.

the naked communist was the naked capitalist 04.Jun.2005 22:06

more

"

"Nixon had been a congressman and made a name for himself as a rabid anti-communist in the 1950s.
"

Yes, though it's more insidious than you think. Nixon was "their man" just as there are gatekeepers everywhere, Nixon was their "attack the Communists gatekeeper." Kept it away from the banker elite and more nationalistically loyal U.S. Congressional investigations.

Actually, Nixon was sponsored into this role because he was international banker connected from the start, inserted into the media limelight to take the heat from Congress people who wanted to look into the U.S.'s tax deductible foundations which did have the Communist connectiosn and which basically engineer and steer the whole U.S. society in any private direction they want through its strategic huge and uncomparable scale of funding in the sciences and education. See the book "The Naked Capitalist", by an ex-FBI man who researched Communists as part of his job, until he found that it all linked back to a handful of U.S. bankers. That book referenced is his commentary and organization of a long review of the book _Tragegy & Hope_ by Carroll Quigley.