portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts global

energy & nuclear

Natural Petroleum: NO Connection With Biological Matter; abiotic oil noted by oil industry

Seems oil industry publications up to four years ago got around to exposing the intermixed depopulation/artificial high-price structure of the oil market, as an energy scam on their own! Good for them. However, of coruse in a society run by spin, that's about the time when people began to trumpet the unscientific peak oil concept...

Published in Energia, 2001, 22/3, 26-34.

"The claims which have traditionally been put forward to argue a connection between natural petroleum and biological matter have been subjected to scientific scrutiny and have been established to be baseless."

However, the Rockfeller family and their ilk recommend you continue to be duped because your attempt to believe otherwise endangers their political power and their profit margins. So if you want to endanger their political power, read on. Assorted PIMC links from the very hot debate (or rather the angry denial) of this phenomena.

Understanding this really helps you grasp the whole power structure of the world at present: corporate fascist, fake environmentalist, eugenic (ex-)Nazis, unpunished from WWII coming back in an attempt on your life.
"Let's call our energy genocide 'Operation Peak Oil'. Think it will work?"
Natural Petroleum - NO Connection With Biological Matter
Gas Resources.net
May 8, 2005

"The claims which have traditionally been put forward to argue a connection between natural petroleum and biological matter have been subjected to scientific scrutiny and have been established to be baseless. The outcome of such scrutiny comes hardly as a surprise, given recognition of the constraints of thermodynamics upon the genesis of hydrocarbons.

If liquid hydrocarbons might evolve from biological detritus in the thermodynamic regime of the crust of the Earth, we could all expect to go to bed at night in our dotage, with white hair (or, at least, whatever might remain of same), a spreading waistline, and all the undesirable decrepitude of age, and to awake in the morning, clear eyed, with our hair returned of the color of our youth, with a slim waistline, a strong, flexible body, and with our sexual vigor restored. Alas, such is not to be. The merciless laws of thermodynamics do not accommodate folklore fables. Natural petroleum has no connection with biological matter."


Dismissal of the Claims of a Biological Connection for Natural Petroleum

(Scientific Paper Published In 'Energia')

J. F. Kenney
Joint Institute of The Physics of the Earth - Russian Academy of Sciences
Gas Resources Corporation, 11811 North Freeway, Houston, TX 77060, U.S.A.

Ac. Ye. F. Shnyukov
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Vladimirskaya Street 56, 252.601 Kiev, Ukraine

V. A. Krayushkin
Institute of Geological Sciences
O. Gonchara Street 55-B, 01054 Kiev, Ukraine

I. K. Karpov
Institute of Geochemistry - Russian Academy of Sciences
Favorskii Street 1a, 664.033 Irkutsk, RUSSIA

V. G. Kutcherov
Russian State University of Oil and Gas
Leninskii Prospect 65, 117.917 Moscow, Russia

I. N. Plotnikova
National Petroleum Company of Tatarstan (TatNeft S.A.)
Butlerov Street 45-54, 423.020 Kazan, Tatarstan, RUSSIA

1. Introduction.

With recognition that the laws of thermodynamics prohibit spontaneous evolution of liquid hydrocarbons in the regime of temperature and pressure characteristic of the crust of the Earth, one should not expect there to exist legitimate scientific evidence that might suggest that such could occur. Indeed, and correctly, there exists no such evidence.

Nonetheless, and surprisingly, there continue to be often promulgated diverse claims purporting to constitute "evidence" that natural petroleum somehow evolves (miraculously) from biological matter. In this short article, such claims are briefly subjected to scientific scrutiny, demonstrated to be without merit, and dismissed.

The claims which purport to argue for some connection between natural petroleum and biological matter fall into roughly two classes: the "look-like/come-from" claims; and the "similar(recondite)-properties/come-from" claims.

The "look-like/come-from" claims apply a line of unreason exactly as designated: Such argue that, because certain molecules found in natural petroleum "look like" certain other molecules found in biological systems, then the former must "come-from" the latter. Such notion is, of course, equivalent to asserting that elephant tusks evolve because those animals must eat piano keys.

In some instances, the "look-like/come-from" claims assert that certain molecules found in natural petroleum actually are biological molecules, and evolve only in biological systems. These molecules have often been given the spurious name "biomarkers."

The scientific correction must be stated unequivocally: There have never been observed any specifically biological molecules in natural petroleum, except as contaminants. Petroleum is an excellent solvent for carbon compounds; and, in the sedimentary strata from which petroleum is often produced, natural petroleum takes into solution much carbon material, including biological detritus. However, such contaminants are unrelated to the petroleum solvent.

The claims about "biomarkers" have been thoroughly discredited by observations of those molecules in the interiors of ancient, abiotic meteorites, and also in many cases by laboratory synthesis under imposed conditions mimicking the natural environment. In the discussion below, the claims put forth about porphyrin and isoprenoid molecules are addressed particularly, because many "look-like/come-from" claims have been put forth for those compounds.

The "similar(recondite)-properties/come-from" claims involve diverse, odd phenomena with which persons not working directly in a scientific profession would be unfamiliar. These include the "odd-even abundance imbalance" claims, the "carbon isotope" claims, and the "optical-activity" claims. The first, the "odd-even abundance imbalance" claims, are demonstrated to be utterly unrelated to any biological property. The second, "carbon isotope" claims, are shown to depend upon measurement of an obscure property of carbon fluids which cannot reliably be considered a measure of origin. The third, the "optical-activity" claims, deserve particular note; for the observations of optical activity in natural petroleum have been trumpeted loudly for years as a "proof" of some "biological origin" of petroleum. Those claims have been thoroughly discredited decades ago by observation of optical activity in the petroleum material extracted from the interiors of carbonaceous meteorites.
More significantly, recent analysis, which has resolved the previously-outstanding problem of the genesis of optical activity in abiotic fluids, has established that the phenomenon of optical activity is an inevitable thermodynamic consequence of the phase stability of multicomponent fluids at high pressures. Thereby, the observation of optical activity in natural petroleum is entirely consistent with the results of the thermodynamic analysis of the stability of the hydrogen-carbon [H-C] system, which establish that hydrocarbon molecules heavier than methane, and particularly liquid hydrocarbons, evolve spontaneously only at high pressures, comparable to those necessary for diamond formation.

There are two subjects which are particularly relevant for destroying the diverse, spurious claims concerning a putative connection of petroleum and biological matter: the investigations of the carbon material from carbonaceous meteorites; and the reaction products of the Fischer-Tropsch process. Because of their importance, a brief discussion of both is in order.

1.1 The carbonaceous meteorites.

The carbonaceous meteorites, including particularly the carbonaceous chondrites, are meteorites whose chemical composition includes carbon in quantities ranging from a few tenths of a percent to approximately six percent, by mass.1-5 The age of the carbonaceous meteorites is typically 3-4.5 billion years; and their origins clearly abiotic. The mineral structures in these rocks establish that the carbonaceous meteorites have existed at very low temperatures, much below the freezing point of water, effectively since the time of their original formation. Such thermal history of the carbonaceous meteorites eliminates any probability that there ever existed on them life, or biological matter.6 The evidence obtained from scientific investigations of the carbon material in carbonaceous meteorites has destroyed many claims which assert a biological connection between natural petroleum and biological matter.

Significantly, much of the carbon material of the carbonaceous meteorites consists of hydrocarbons, as both solids and in liquid form.1, 5, 7, 8 However, the petroleum material contained in carbonaceous meteorites cannot be considered to be the origin of the natural petroleum found in the near-surface crust of the Earth. The heating which inevitably accompanied the impact process during the accretion of meteorites into the Earth at the time of its formation would almost certainly have caused decomposition of most of their contained hydrocarbon molecules. The carbonaceous meteorites provided the Earth with its carbon (albeit much of it delivered in the form of hydrocarbons) but not its hydrocarbons or natural petroleum. (The processes by which hydrocarbons evolve from the native materials of the Earth are described, and demonstrated, in the following article.)

1.2 The Fischer-Tropsch process.

The Fischer-Tropsch process is the best-known industrial technique for the synthesis of hydrocarbons, and has been used for more than seventy-five years. The Fischer-Tropsch process reacts carbon monoxide and hydrogen at synthesis conditions of approximately 150 bar and 700 K, in the presence of ThO2, MgO, Al2O3, MnO, clays, and the catalysts Ni, Co, and Fe. The reactions are as follow:

When a Ni-Co catalyst is used, the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis proceeds according to the reaction:
When a Fe catalyst is used, the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis proceeds according to the reaction:
The yield of the Fischer-Tropsch process is approximately 200 g of hydrocarbons from 1 m3 of CO and H2 mixture. During World War II, the production of liquid fuels by the Fischer-Tropsch process was used extensively in Germany; approximately 600,000 t of synthetic gasoline were synthesized in 1943.

The reaction products of the Fischer-Tropsch process are only metastable in the thermodynamic conditions of their synthesis; at pressures of approximately only 150 bar and 700 K, the destruction of liquid hydrocarbons is inevitable. During the industrial Fischer-Tropsch process, the reaction products are promptly cooled and moved to conditions of lower pressure. The natural environment does not mimic the highly-controlled, and highly-regulated, industrial, Fischer-Tropsch process. The Fischer-Tropsch process cannot be considered for the generation of natural petroleum.

2. The specious "biomarker" claims: The irrelevancy of the presence in petroleum of porphyrins, - and similarly of isoprenoids, pristane, phytane, clorins, terpines, cholestane, etc.

One may read, in almost every textbook published in the English language purporting to deal with the subject of petroleum geology, diverse claims made that the presence of certain molecules found in natural petroleum constitute "evidence," or even "proof," that the petroleum evolved from biological matter. Such molecules, claimed as evidence of a biological connection, include such as porphyrins, isoprenoids, pristane, phytane, cholestane, terpines, and clorins. Closer investigations have proven such claims to be groundless. Pristane and phytane are simply branched alkanes of the isoprenoid class. Cholestane, C27H48, is a true, highly-reduced hydrocarbon, but is not to be confused with the oxidized, biotic, molecule cholesterol. Cholestane and cholesterol have similar geometric structures, and share similar carbon skeletons; there the similarity ends. Cholestane is a constituent of natural petroleum; cholesterol is not. Significantly, the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis produces isoprenoids, including phytane and pristine.

Material of truly biogenic origin, such as fossil spores or pollen, is indeed often observed in petroleum, - and too often mislabeled as "biomarkers," supposedly indicating a connection between the natural petroleum and biological material. Careful investigation has established that such material has been leached into solution by the crude oil from buried organic matter in the (typically sedimentary) reservoir rocks from which the oil has been taken.9, 10

Contrarily, the indisputably biological material, such as spores and pollen, found in petroleum can be considered as "abiomarkers" of petroleum origin. For examples, crude oil found in reservoir rocks of the Permian age always contain not only spores and pollen of the Permian age but also spores and pollen of older ages, such as, for example, the Carboniferous, Devonian and Precambrian in petroleum investigated in Tatarstan, Russia. In the same region and in other portions of the Volga-Urals geological province, crude oils in the Carbonaceous sediments are characterized with concentrations of spores of Carbonaceous-through-Precambrian ages, and crudes in the Devonian sandstones with spores of Devonian-through-Precambrian ages.9, 11
The types of porphyrins, isoprenoids, terpines, and clorins found in natural petroleum have been observed in material extracted from the interiors of no fewer than fifty-four meteorites, including amphoteric meteorites (Chainpur, Ngavi, Semarkona), bronze chondrites (Charis, Ghubara, Kulp, Tieschitz), carbonaceous chondrites of all four petrological classes (Alais, Bali, Bells, Cold Bockeveld, Eracot, Felix, Groznaia, Haripura, Ivuna, Kaba, Kainsaz, Karoonda, Lance, Mighei, Mokoia, Murchison, Murrey, Orgueil, Ornans, Pseudo, Renazzo, Santa Cruz, St.Capraix, Staroye Boriskino, Tonk, Vigarano, Warrenton), enstatite meteorites (Abee, Hvittis, Indarkh), hypersthene chondrites (Bishunpur, Bruderheim, Gallingebirge, Holbrook, Homestead, Krymka), iron meteorites (Arus (Yardymli), Burgavli, Canyon Diabolo, Odessa, Toluca), aubrite meteorites (Norton County), and ureilite meteorites (Dyalpur, Goalpara, Novo Urei).9, 12, 13

The observations of such molecules in meteorites thoroughly discredited the claims that their presence in natural petroleum might somehow constitute evidence of a biological connection. Because especially strenuous (and especially erroneous) claims are often made particularly about the porphyrins observed in natural petroleum, those molecules will be discussed in modest detail.

Porphyrins comprise a class of molecules designated cyclic ionopheres, a special class of polydentate ligands for metals. Porphyrins are heavy, approximately planar, chelating molecules, found in both biotic and abiotic systems. Several porphyrin molecules are of special biological significance: vitamin B12; chlorophyll, the porphyrin which is the agent of the photosynthesis process in plants; and the heme molecule, the porphyrin component of the protein hemoglobin which is responsible for the transport of oxygen in mammalian blood. As an example of the high molecular weight of porphyrins, hemoglobin has the empirical chemical formula, [C738H1166O208N203S2Fe]4. Neither vitamin B12, nor chlorophyll, nor heme (nor hemoglobin), nor any biotic porphyrin has ever been observed as a component of natural petroleum.

The porphyrin molecules found in natural petroleum possess different side-groups than do those of chlorophyll or heme. The central chelated metal element in chlorophyll is always magnesium; in heme, it is iron. In porphyrin molecules found in natural petroleum, the central chelated metal element is typically vanadium or nickel.

As stated, porphyrin molecules evolve both biologically and abiologically. During the 1960's and 1970's, porphyrin molecules, which are the same as those found in terrestrial natural petroleum, were observed in the hydrocarbon fluids extracted from the interiors of carbonaceous meteorites.
The observations of petroleum-type porphyrins in the hydrocarbon fluids extracted from the interiors of carbonaceous meteorites destroyed, a fortiori, the claims that such molecules constitute "evidence" for a connection of petroleum with biological matter. Additionally, after the observations of porphyrins in carbonaceous meteorites, those petroleum-type porphyrins were synthesized abiologically in the laboratory under chemical and thermodynamic conditions specially set to mimic the abiotic conditions in meteorites.8, 14

The "porphyrin evidence" claims were destroyed by the investigations of carbonaceous meteorites approximately thirty years ago, and are well known throughout the community of scientists working in the field of petroleum. Every compound designated as a "biomarker," and not otherwise identified as a contaminant, has been either observed in the fluids extracted from the interiors of meteorites, or synthesized in laboratories under conditions comparable to the crust of the Earth, - or both.
Such scientific facts, and the general knowledge of same, not withstanding, every textbook published in the English language purportedly dealing with the subject of petroleum geology, including the ones cited above, continues to repeat the old discredited claims that the presence of (abiotic) porphyrins in natural petroleum provide evidence for its origin from biological matter.15-17 Such assertions, thirty years after having been demonstrated scientifically insupportable, must be acknowledged to be intellectual fraud, pure and simple.

3. The "odd-even" abundance claims, - involving the small imbalance of the relative abundances of linear hydrocarbon molecules containing an odd number of carbon atoms, compared to homologous ones containing an even number.

The claims concerning the imbalance of linear molecules containing odd and even numbers, respectively, of carbon atoms is another of the genre of "the constituents of natural petroleum 'have the same properties as' the constituents of biological systems, in such-or-so a way, and therefore petroleum must have evolved from biological matter." No intelligent teenage student at, for examples, a Russian, German, Dutch, or Swiss gymnasium, would accept such reasoning. Nonetheless, such claims are commonly put forth in English-language textbooks purporting to deal with petroleum geology. Such claims are herewith shown to be without merit and insupportable.

Fig. 1 Symbolic representation of a molecule of normal octane, n-C8H18.
(see  http://www.gasresources.net/DisposalBioClaims.htm)

Natural petroleum is a mixture of hydrocarbon molecules of several classes. The most common class of molecules in petroleum is that of the normal alkanes, or n-alkanes, which have the chemical formula CnH2n+2 and a chain-like structure (as noted in the first article). For example, n-octane, C8H18, has the structure shown schematically in Fig. 1. Correctly, the carbon atoms do not lie exactly along a straight line; a picture of n-octane which more accurately represents its geometric properties is shown in Fig. 2, where n-C8H18 is drawn as a "stick-&-ball" model. Nonetheless, in both figures, the linear chain-like aspect of the n-alkane molecule is shown clearly.

Similarly as for cyclohexane as described in the first article, the hydrocarbon n-C8H18 is geometrically related to one or more biological molecules by substitution of some of the hydrogen atoms by OH radicals. Specifically, if one of the hydrogen atoms on each carbon atom in n-C8H18 were replaced by an OH radical, the resulting molecule, n-C8H18O8, would be a carbohydrate, as shown in Fig. 3, a simple sugar related to fructose (and whose chemical potential is approximately 2,500 cal lower than that of n-octane).

Fig. 2 Stick & ball representation of a molecule of normal octane, n-C8H18.
(see  http://www.gasresources.net/DisposalBioClaims.htm)

In a distribution of linear hydrocarbon molecules which comprise natural petroleum, the chain-like n-alkanes manifest a slight imbalance of abundances which favors molecules possessing an odd number of carbon atoms, as compared to those with an even number. Similarly, a distribution of linear biological molecules, such as the chain-like carbohydrates, manifests also a similar slight imbalance of molecules possessing an odd number of carbon atoms, again as compared to those with an even number. From this modest, and somewhat arcane, similarity of odd-to-even abundances, assertions have been made that hydrocarbons evolve from biological matter. Of course, the second law of thermodynamics prohibits such, which fact should obviate any such assertion.

Simple investigation of hydrocarbons generated from abiotic matter manifest also such odd-to-even imbalance of molecular abundances for the linear molecules. The reaction products of the Fischer-Tropsch process manifest the same odd-to-even abundance imbalances of linear molecules as do both natural petroleum, as well as biological molecules.

A specific example of the inevitable genesis of hydrocarbon molecules which manifest such odd-to-even abundance imbalances of linear molecules was demonstrated by Zemanian, Streett, and Zollweg more than fifteen years ago. Zemanian et al. demonstrated the genesis of heavy and liquid hydrocarbons at high pressures and temperatures from a mixture of methane and propane. Particularly, Zemanian et al. measured the relative abundances of the linear chain hydrocarbon molecules. Their observations, of the imbalance of abundances, and slight excess, of chain molecules with odd numbers of carbon atoms are quoted here (pp. 63-64):18
Fig. 3 The simple carbohydrate, n-C8H18O8.
(see  http://www.gasresources.net/DisposalBioClaims.htm)
"These results are also notable when one considers the even-to-odd carbon number ratio of petroleum.
One of the arguments for a biological origin of petroleum has been that these fluids generally show a small marked prevalence of odd numbered hydrocarbons. It is also well known that living organisms produce primarily odd numbered carbon [or carbohydrate] chains. Abiological processes have been presumed to produce even and odd numbered hydrocarbons in roughly equal concentrations. The results of this work demonstrate that presumption to be false. Both biological and abiological hydrocarbon chemistries favor reactions involving two carbons over single carbon reactions [leading to preferred reactants of odd-numbered chain molecules]."

It deserves note that the "odd-even abundance-imbalance" claim, as "evidence"[sic] of a biological origin of hydrocarbon molecules, was rejected by competent physicists and statistical mechanicians, almost immediately when it was introduced. The odd-even abundance imbalance is simply a result of the directional property of the covalent bond together with the geometry of linear molecules.

4. The phenomenon of optical activity in natural petroleum: Evidence of an abiotic, high-pressure genesis.

Perhaps for reason of its historical provenance in fermented wine, the phenomenon of optical activity in fluids was for some time believed to have some intrinsic connection with biological processes or materials.20, 21 Such error persisted until the phenomenon of optical activity was observed in material extracted from the interiors of meteorites; some of which material had been believed previously to be uniquely of biotic origin.

From the interiors of carbonaceous meteorites have been extracted the common amino-acid molecules alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, glycine, leusine, proline, serine, threonine, as well as the unusual ones a-aminoisobutyric acid, isovaline, pseudoleucine.22-24 At one time, all had been considered to be solely of biotic origin. The ages of the carbonaceous meteorites were determined to be 3-4.5 billion years, and their origins clearly abiotic. Therefore, those amino acids had to be recognized as compounds of both biological and abiological genesis. Furthermore, solutions of amino acid molecules from carbonaceous meteorites were observed to manifest optical activity. Thus was thoroughly discredited the notion that the phenomenon of optical activity in fluids (particularly those of carbon compounds) might have any intrinsic connection with biotic matter. Significantly, the optical activity observed in the amino acids extracted from carbonaceous meteorites has not the characteristics of such of common biotic origin, with only one enantiomer present; instead, it manifests the characteristics observed in natural petroleum, with unbalanced, so-called scalemic, abundances of chiral molecules.25

The optical activity commonly observed in natural petroleum has been for years speciously claimed as "proof" of some connection with biological detritus, - albeit one requiring both a willing disregard of the considerable differences between the optical activity observed in natural petroleum and that in materials of truly biotic origin, such as wine, as well as desuetude of the dictates of the laws of thermodynamics.

Optical activity is observed in minerals such as quartz or Iceland spar, as well as in oil, and among biological molecules. The optical activity observed in petroleum is more characteristic of the same in abiotic minerals, such as naturally occurring quartz, which are polycrystalline minerals, with a scalemic distribution of domains of left- and right-rotational properties. The chiral molecules in petroleum manifest scalemic distributions, and significantly lack the homochiral distribution which characterize biotic optically active matter. The optical activity in natural petroleum is characterized by either a right (positive, or dextrorotary) or left (negative, or levorotary) rotation of the plane of polarization. By contrast, in biological material left (levorotary) rotation dominates.

The observation of optical activity in hydrocarbon material extracted from the interiors of carbonaceous meteorites, and typical of such in natural petroleum, discredited those claims.2, 26 Nonetheless, the scientific conundrum as to why the hydrocarbons manifest optical activity, in both carbonaceous meteorites and terrestrial crude oil remained unresolved until recently.

The chiral molecules in natural petroleum originate from three distinct sources: contamination by biological detritus in the near-surface strata from which the oil has been taken; the biological alteration and degradation of the original oil by microbes which consume and metabolize oil; and the chiral hydrocarbon molecules which are intrinsic to the petroleum and generated with it. Only the last concerns the origin of petroleum.

The genesis of the scalemic distribution of chiral molecules of natural petroleum has recently been shown to be a direct consequence of the chiral geometry of the system particles acting according to the laws of classical thermodynamics. The resolution of the problem of the origin of the scalemic distributions of chiral molecules in natural petroleum has been shown to be an inevitable consequence of their high-pressure genesis.19 Thus, the phenomenon of optical activity in natural petroleum, contrary to supporting any assertion of a biological connection, strongly confirms the high-pressure genesis of natural petroleum, and thereby the modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of deep, abiotic petroleum origins.

5. The carbon isotope ratios, and their inadequacy as indicators of origin.

The claims made concerning the carbon isotope ratios, and specifically such as purport to identify the origin of the material, particularly the hydrocarbons, are especially recondite and outside the experience of most persons not knowledgeable in the physics of hydrogen-carbon [H-C] systems. Furthermore, the claims concerning the carbon isotope ratios most often involve methane, the only hydrocarbon which is thermodynamically stable in the regime of temperatures and pressures of the Earth's crust, and the only one which spontaneously evolves there.

The carbon nucleus has two stable isotopes, 12C and 13C. The overwhelmingly most abundance stable isotope of carbon is 12C, which possesses six protons and six neutrons; 13C possesses an extra neutron. (There is another, unstable isotope, 14C, which possesses two extra neutrons; 14C results from a high-energy reaction of the nitrogen nucleus, 14N, with a high-energy cosmic ray particle. The isotope 14C is not involved in the claims about the isotope ratios of carbon.) The carbon isotope ratio, designated d13C, is simply the ratio of the abundance of carbon isotopes 13C/12C, normalized to the standard of the marine carbonate named Pee Dee Belemnite. The values of the measured d13C ratio is expressed as a percentage (compared to the standard).

During the 1950's, increasingly numerous measurements of the carbon isotope ratios of hydrocarbon gases were taken, particularly of methane; and too often assertions were made that such ratios could unambiguously determine the origin of the hydrocarbons. The validity of such assertions were tested, independently by Colombo, Gazzarini, and Gonfiantini in Italy and by Galimov in Russia. Both sets of workers established that the carbon isotope ratios cannot be used reliably to determine the origin of the carbon compound tested.

Colombo, Gazzarini, and Gonfiantini demonstrated conclusively, by a simple experiment the results of which admitted no ambiguity, that the carbon isotope ratios of methane change continuously along its transport path, becoming progressively lighter with distance traveled. Colombo et al. took a sample of natural gas and passed it through a column of crushed rock, chosen to resemble as closely as possible the terrestrial environment.27 Their results were definitive: The greater the distance of rock through which the sample of methane passes, the lighter becomes its carbon isotope ratio.

The reason for the result observed by Colombo et al. is straightforward: there is a slight preference for the heavier isotope of carbon to react chemically with the rock through which the gas passes. Therefore, the greater the transit distance through the rock, the lighter becomes the carbon isotope ratio, as the heavier is preferentially removed by chemical reaction along the transport path. This result is not surprising; contrarily, such is entirely consistent with the fundamental requirements of quantum mechanics and kinetic theory.

Pertinent to the matter of any claim that a light carbon isotope ratio might be indicative of a biological origin, the results demonstrated by Colombo et al. establish that such a claim is insupportable. Methane which might have originated from carbon material from the remains of a carbonaceous meteorite in the mantle of the Earth, and possessing initially a heavy carbon isotope ratio, could easily have that ratio diminished, along the path of its transit into the crust of the Earth, to a value comparable to common biological material.

Galimov demonstrated that the carbon isotope ratio of methane can become progressively heavier while at rest in a reservoir in the crust of the Earth, through the action of methane-consuming microbes.28 The city of Moscow stores methane in water-wet reservoirs on the outskirts of that city, into which natural gas is injected throughout the year. During summers, the quantity of methane in the reservoirs increases because of less use (primarily by heating), and during winters the quantity is drawn down. By calibrating the reservoir volumes and the distance from the injection facilities, the residency time of the methane in the reservoir is determined. Galimov established that the longer the methane remains in the reservoir, the heavier becomes its carbon isotope ratio.

The reason for the result observed by Galimov is also straightforward: In the water of the reservoir, there live microbes of the common, methane-metabolizing type. There is a slight preference for the lighter isotope of carbon to enter the microbe cell and to be metabolized. The longer the methane remains in the reservoir, the more of it is consumed by the methane-metabolizing microbes, with the molecules possessing lighter isotope being consumed more. Therefore, the longer its residency time in the reservoir, the heavier becomes the carbon isotope ratio, as the lighter is preferentially removed by methane-metabolizing microbes. This result is entirely consistent with the fundamental requirements of kinetic theory.

Furthermore, the carbon isotope ratios in hydrocarbon systems are also strongly influenced by the temperature of reaction. For hydrocarbons produced by the Fischer-Tropsch process, the d13C varies from -65% at 127 C to -20% at 177 C.29, 30 No material parameter, the measurement of which varies by almost 70% with a variation of temperature of only approximately 10%, can be used as a reliable determinant of any property of that material.

The d13C carbon isotope ratio cannot be considered to determine reliably the origin of a sample of methane, - or any other compound.

6. Conclusion.

The claims which have traditionally been put forward to argue a connection between natural petroleum and biological matter have been subjected to scientific scrutiny and have been established to be baseless. The outcome of such scrutiny comes hardly as a surprise, given recognition of the constraints of thermodynamics upon the genesis of hydrocarbons.

If liquid hydrocarbons might evolve from biological detritus in the thermodynamic regime of the crust of the Earth, we could all expect to go to bed at night in our dotage, with white hair (or, at least, whatever might remain of same), a spreading waistline, and all the undesirable decrepitude of age, and to awake in the morning, clear eyed, with our hair returned of the color of our youth, with a slim waistline, a strong, flexible body, and with our sexual vigor restored. Alas, such is not to be. The merciless laws of thermodynamics do not accommodate folklore fables. Natural petroleum has no connection with biological matter.

However, recognition of such fact leaves unanswered the conundrums which eluded the scientific community for more than a century: How does natural petroleum evolve ? And from where does natural petroleum come ?

The theoretical resolution of these questions had to await development of the most modern techniques of quantum statistical mechanics. The experimental demonstration of the required equipment has been only recently available. The following article substantially answers these questions.

1 M. H. Studier, R. Hayatsu and E. Anders, "Organic compounds in carbonaceous chondrites", Science, 1965, 149, 1455-1459.
2 B. Nagy, Carbonaceous Meteorites, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1975.
3 G. P. Vdovykin, Carbonaceous Matter of Meteorites (Organic Compounds, Diamonds, Graphite), Nauka Press, Moscow, 1976.
4 B. Mason, "The carbonaceous chondrites", Space Science Review, 1963, 1, 621-640.
5 C. A. Ponnamperuma, "The carbonaceous meteorites", in Carbonaceous Meteorites, ed. B. Nagy, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1975, 747.
6 J. D. Bernal, "Significance of carbonaceous meteorites in theories on the origin of life", Nature, 1961, 190, 129-131.
7 E. Gelphi and J. Oro, "Organic compounds in meteorites - IV. Gas chromatographic - mass spectrometric studies of isoprenoids and other isomeric alkanes in carbonaceous chordrites", Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1970, 34, 981-994.
8 G. W. Hodgson and B. L. Baker, "Evidence for porphyrins in the Orgueil meteorite", Nature, 1964, 202, 125-131.
9 V. A. Krayushkin, The Abiotic, Mantle Origin of Petroleum, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1984.
10 V. B. Porfir'yev, "Inorganic origin of petroleum", American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 1974, 58, 3-33.
11 P. N. Kropotkin, Y. I. Pikovskii, B. M. Valyaev, K. B. Serebrovskaya, A. P. Rudenko, A. L. Lapidus, E. B. Chekaliuk and G. N. Dolenko, Journal of D. I. Mendeleev, All-Union Chem. Soc., Moscow, 1986.
12 M. H. Studier, R. Hayatsu and E. Anders, "Origin of organic matter in the early solar system: I. Hydrocarbons", Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1968, 32, 151-173.
13 G. P. Vdovykin, Meteorites, Nauka, Moscow, 1968.
14 G. W. Hodgson and B. L. Baker, "Porphyrin abiogenesis from pyrole and formaldehyde under simulated geochemical conditions", Nature, 1967, 216, 29-32.
15 F. K. North, Petroleum Geology, Allen & Unwin, Boston, 1985.
16 B. Tissot and D. H. Welte, Petroleum Formation and Occurrence, Springer, Berlin, 1981.
17 R. C. Selley, Elements of Petroleum Geology, W. H. Freeman, New York, 1995.
18 T. S. Zemanian, Chemical Kinetics and Equilibria of Hydrocarbon Mixtures at Advanced Temperatures and Pressures, Cornell, Ithaca, 1985.
19 J. F. Kenney and U. K. Deiters, "The evolution of multicomponent systems at high pressures: IV. The genesis of optical activity in high-density, abiotic fluids", Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2000, 2, 3163-3174.
20 L. Pasteur, "Sur la dissymétrie moleculaire", C.R. Hebd. Séanc, 1848, 26, 535.
21 L. Pasteur, "Sur la dissymétrie moleculaire", in Leçons de chimie professées en 1860 par M. M. Pasteur, Cahours, Wurtz, Berthelot, Sante-claire Deville, Barral, et Dumas, Paris 1861, Hachette, Paris, 1886.
22 M. H. Engel and B. Nagy, "Distribution and enantiomeric composition of amino acids in the Murchison meteorite", Nature, 1982, 296, 837-840.
23 M. H. Engel, S. A. Macko and J. A. Silfer, "Carbon isotope composition of individual amino acids in the Murchison meteorite", Nature, 1990, 348, 47-49.
24 M. H. Engel and S. A. Macko, "Isotopic evidence for extraterrestrial non-racemic amino acids in the Murchison meteorite", Nature, 1997, 389, 265-268.
25 S. Pizzarello and J. R. Cronin, "Non-racemic amino acids in the Murray and Murchison meteorites", Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 2000, 64, 329-338.
26 B. Nagy, "Optical Activity in the Orgueil meteorite", Science, 1965, 150, 1846.
27 U. Colombo, F. Gazzarini and R. Gonfiantini, "Die Variationen in der chemischen und isotopen Zusammensetzung von Erdgas aus Suditalien", Leipzig, 1967, vol. Vortrag ASTI-67.
28 E. M. Galimov, Isotope Zusammensetzung des Kohlenstoffe aus Gassen der Erdrinde, Leipzig, 1967.
29 V. A. Krayushkin, "Origins, patterns, dimensions, and distributions of the world petroleum potential", Georesursy, 2000, 3, 14-18.
30 P. Szatmari, "Petroleum formation by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis in plate tectonics", Bull. A.A.P.G., 1989, 73, 989-996.

Published in Energia, 2001, 22/3, 26-34.

related, for more on abiotic oil see:


Stalin & Abiotic Oil versus international corporate oil's PLANNED GLOBAL

PEAK OIL' THEORY BITES THE DUST: By 1951, what has been called the Modern
Russian-Ukrainian Theory of Deep, Abiotic Petroleum Origins was born. A
healthy amount of scientific debate followed for the next couple of
decades, during which time the theory, initially formulated by geologists,
based on observational data, was validated through the rigorous
quantitative work of chemists, physicists and thermodynamicists. For the
last couple of decades, the theory has been accepted as established fact
by virtually the entire scientific community of the (former) Soviet Union.
It is backed up by literally thousands of published studies in
prestigious, peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Only the world is being led like sheep to believe that the oncoming
PLANNED HUMAN HOLOCAUST is going to be strictly accidental instead of WHAT
OF A CONVENIENT LIE. The modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of deep, abiotic
petroleum origins is not controversial nor presently a matter of academic

[and a comment quote]

There is no science that has ever been accepted to claim Peak Oil
physically exists. Sure, there are lots of mathematical abstract models
and corporate released data. However on the issue of the origin and
physical creation of oil it is clear from the above (and elsewhere) that
the biotic theory is bunk.

None of the biotic oil theory data has anything to do with the physical
creation of oil, it's all referred to issues of documenting supposed "drop
in production" when production is a social thing. Besides, as several
articles above show, some oil areas keep renewing themselves. See that
Cornell geologist above, hmm?

None of the corporate spiel can be considered a form of science, since the
data itself is hardly public domain and since they refuse to address the
issue of oil's physical creation and origin instead of simply providing
misconstruded data on its "drop in production."

Biotic oil theory is all based on trusting people like Halliburton.

Trusting people like Chevron.
Trusting people like Exxon.
Trusting people like the Rockefellers.

What you have are very powerful corporations and a consolidated media
creating an advertising belief for legitimating (1) why petroleum prices
are so high that takes the public's mind off their corporate greed, and
(2) why they are planning to escape the blame when they consolidate the
world's oil ownership and then pull their own plug on you. Peak Oil is
only a human creation, a human phenomena designed to maintain power
thorugh maintaining scarcity.

However, I'm hardly saying that I want oil. I'm just saying that look to
politics of intentional scarcity and market manipulation for why we have
the energy hegemonies we have.



Popularization of "Peak Oil" comes from Club of Rome!; Ruppert's heroes
disown oil stance
08:01 Mar-14 (9 comments)


1. For those young enough to have to catch up with the villany of your
ancestors, if you want to understand it, the Club of Rome connection shows
that ideological "peak oil lie" talk and material "kill everybody off"
talk were blended together from the very start--like strands of DNA
inseparable and required for each other to replicate the lie meme. This
has been an interlinked helix of ideological/material ideas espoused from
the same high level group for at least 30 years--despite of course knowing
that their own foundational meme about "depleting oil" was a lie. A
propaganda campaign. If they knew that, and still propagaged the lie, then
the connected policy recommendation they had--mass depopulationism--was
the real goal looking for some means to cast the blame for their actions
elsewhere and leave the very active guilty looking blameless. Team "Peak
Oil" is the selling tool. The following information shows that
depopulatist agenda setters--read that as eugenicists and biowarfare
people--have decided upon selling the lie of "peak oil" from the very
beginning of their strategy of depopulationism/eugenics/biowarfare vectors
in the 1970s.

2. McGowan and others make the interesting point that the whole framework
of "gas depletion allowances" which give the oil companies millions of
dollars in tax write-offs, are thus a lie as well. These should be revoked
since oil is abiotic and renewable. These 'depletion allowances' (sic)
should disappear in a puff of legal logic. Of course the oil corporation
elites of Bush/Cheney are going to keep selling you their "peak oil" scam:
its built into the U.S. tax perk structure for several generations of
amassed profits. Make that amassed stolen profits, because they have been
based on lies.]

3. McGowan writes: "Oh yes, before I forget, I need to, regrettably, hand
out a couple of Hall of Shame Awards. The first goes to the Centre for
Research on Globalisation, for posting, among other things, a repellent
piece by F. William Engdahl entitled "Iraq and the Problem of Peak Oil."
The second goes to Online Journal, for posting too many 'Peak Oil'-themed
pieces to list here (including a number of articles penned by Larry Chin,
who doesn't seem to be able to write on any subject without tying it in to
'Peak Oil'). Both of these websites were, at one time, among the best at
providing alternative news and commentary. Both are now pitching 'Peak
Oil' without offering any hint that there is another side to the debate.
And that, I'm afraid, is absolutely shameful."

4. While the BBC has been busily pitching the 'Peak Oil' scare, The
Scotsman has been rather skeptical of the scam. On May 21, correspondent
James Reynolds focused on a new report by Dr. Leonard Magueri in the
journal Science. In the report [in peer-reviewed Science magazine, instead
of unreviewed corporate propaganda preferred by Michael Ruppert], Magueri
argued "the world is not running out of oil, and the reality is that there
are abundant supplies for years to come." Magueri pointed out that
estimates of proven reserves have been increasing since the 1940s, and,
"thanks to new exploration, drilling and recovery technology, the
worldwide finding and development cost per barrel of oil equivalent has
dramatically declined over the last 20 years, from an average of about $21
in 1979-81 to under $6 in 1997-99. At the same time, the recovery rate
from world oilfields has increased from about 22 percent in 1980 to 35
percent today."
(  http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=578462004)

On June 16, The Scotsman openly ridiculed the 'Peak Oil' concept (and
various other end-of-the-world scenarios that have been pitched over the
years). After recounting numerous predictions of imminent demise that
never came to pass, the authors conclude with this tongue-in-cheek
assessment of 'Peak Oil': "But perhaps the most often repeated catastrophe
predicted is the exhaustion of the world's oil reserves. As early as 1919
the head of the US geological survey forecast that the end would come in
nine years....[gotta keep up the agit-prop agenda, because only lies and
mass psychology support a monopoly price structure for the world's most
plentiful resource to be sold artificially as the world's most finite
(  http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=683192004)

"Bardi associates the abiotic petroleum theory specifically with Dr.
Thomas Gold, noting only in a footnote that the theory actually "had its
origin in the work of a group of Ukrainian and Russian scientists." Also
interesting is that Bardi repeatedly refers to Gold in the present tense,
implying that the doctor is still alive and able to defend his work,
although Bardi is certainly aware of Dr. Gold's untimely demise just a few
short months ago (just as 'Peak Oil' stories were popping up all over the
mainstream media)." ... "My own feelings about the late Dr. Gold are
decidedly mixed. On the one hand, he was almost certainly the plagiarist
that he was accused of being. And the possibility exists, I suppose, that
he may have deliberately misrepresented the science, thereby making
abiotic petroleum theory infinitely easier to discredit and marginalize.
On the other hand, however, Gold undeniably did more than anyone else to
bring the notion of abiotic petroleum origins to the Western world. And
the timing of his death was certainly suspicious, to say the least --
especially now that it is being followed by appalling post-mortem


5. "...we have been deliberately lied to for decades about the source and
availability of the substance that is the very life-force of modern
industrial society."




newswire article reposts global 15.Mar.2005 12:53
corporate dominance | human & civil rights | sustainability
Hey Folks, it's a Coercive Hoax. stOp. (S)HriLL (O)iL (S)hiLLs.
author: CultureJamCleveland


newswire article commentary united states 17.Apr.2005 20:14
energy & nuclear
Sleepwalking into the Apocalypse: A conversation on Peak Oil
author: gb

(1) there is only scientific evidence that oil is abiotically created, period--there is no evidence physically for oil being of a fossil-fuel origin--see first links; that has always been a total scam to justify the high prices of oil, it came from theories of 250 years ago--that never ever gathered any evidence for their justification. The total scam of the "fossil fuel theory" were just carried over from the 1700s ideas because they alone among ideas about oil were the only convenient ways to frame (abiotic) oil falsely as a "scarce and unreplenishable resource."

(2) the "tragedy" they keep softening people up for is entirely their own design. The dislocations are not going to be an accidental oversight or are going to be the effect of some physical reality of the issue of "supply and demand" etc.--all information about oil of course is entirely private anyway, why trust anything they say as for their motivations particularly when the whole framing is designed to make something social like production seem entirely neutral? moreover, they want you to believe that your life dislocation will be "damned bad, though not our fault!". However, the dislocation will be their fault. This is because they are (2a) intentionally and socially shutting down oil production currently--even from profitable California refineries to make it look like "oil is peaking naturally." Even other oil companies that want to buy these refineries are being denied them! And the corrupt U.S.A. is looking the other way. Links above. (2b) the other part of the intentionality is that they are keeping other technological frameworks of energy offline to faciliate the dislocation they want POLITICALLY. (2c) What backs up (2b) is that oil companies in the past 10 years have been buying up the "alternative energy" market patents. However, you don't hear about them seriously using these patents. What you do hear about is the repressive attempt to confiscate all of this alternative technology, like that Ford electric car/truck that was in the news recently. There are markets for these alternative technologies out there. However, they are intentionally not being filled for a political purpose of dislocation. (2d) This dislocation will suit them politically to usher in and justify a police state crackdown after they created the "oil shock" context for themselves. (2e) The 21st century "oil shock" will be just like their practice run "oil shock" in the 1970s. (2f) There were Congressional investigations of their artificial 1970s "oil shock" mass social manipulation tests then (in the 1970s). There are none now. Oil men are in the White House. And they are the same regrouping from the late 1970s. Thus, what these people were working on in the 1970s--all those plans--are being dusted off.

(3) Environmentalism is one large movement. However, there is a corporate-fascist wing within environmentalism. (3a) This is the totally unpunished Rockefeller-oilcorp-media-eugenics wing--the same connections since the early 20th century! Their discredited and very openly discussed 20th century eugenic and depopulationist goals are still there: they have only been now "green-coated". These people (not all people) are using the cloak of environmentalism to justify fascist consolidation and eugenics in the Third World--and soon the First World. Military bioloical warfare techniques will be utilized as well on civilian populations. See above discussion and links to that book. There are of coruse other books on this topic. It hardly takes a genius to note that if you are a fascist and you have the strangehold on the world's oil based energy, and you are in the biological warfare research as well, you would utilzie your corporate and military institutional advantage to promote your political eugenic goals--even against your own economic interest--if what you really were after was political power. (3b) The depopulationist Club of Rome for instance was filled with the same people (and oil company people) who were helping the Nazis in WWII.

(4) It is important to understand the physical reality of what is going on (abiotic oil) COMBINED with the political issues of these die-hard fascist-eugenecists in the oil companies. Not one or the other. Both. Without thinking about both, you are unable to seriously make plans for what to do or know what is really going on. Instead, remember to always ask the question: "Is what I am being coached to want, really someone else's interest?"

(5) My advice is get yourself set with non-oil based technologies of energy, perhaps a group-friend investment in something good. Oil is being POLITICALLY NOT ECONOMICALLY shut down, because it is on their political schedule. Your mass disloation reactions are going to be managed, similar to the 1970s. Don't let that happen and you will be less manipulated and held hostage to them. (5a) My additional advice is to protect yourself the best you know how (healthy foods, vitamins, don't trust mass "innoculation" campains) from their coming (it's already here) military biowarfare on the world's population.

(6) If getting more information out about these high level criminal behaviors helps to slow or stop it--or even get the real actors in jail--you can bet I or others are going to do our best.

(7) I never even suggested that abiotic oil would be GOOD. I have always thought that abiotic oil that puts up tons of atmospheric carbon is a foolish energy choice. I'm not supporting abiotic oil's continuity.


Immanuel Velikovsky said this in the 1950s 16.Jul.2005 05:37


Read Worlds in Collision and Earth in Upheaval.

exactly 16.Jul.2005 12:58


Re-printing wierd tales from the times of soviet-communism is one thing, but ... 16.Jul.2005 13:00


1) Can you show me at least one existing oil well, that replenishes at the same rate it gets depleted?

2) How many of these "replenishable" wells do exist and where are they situated at?

3) Is planet earth infinite or finite?

4) Is it possible to have exponential growth in a closed system?

5) Is there enough high grade iron ore left in the ground for an "all-out" Fischer-Tropsch based "oil industry"?

Have fun answering the questions.

Exactly! 16.Jul.2005 14:43


LNG from Titan = Energy Independence 16.Jul.2005 16:16


There is plenty of LNG on Titan. It is both accessible and retrievable. Now the world will never run out of energy.

hilarous 17.Jul.2005 04:55


the author is not very credible

re: Peak Oil - Peak Hype 17.Jul.2005 11:06

Paul Grignon _ Lifeboat News pgrignon@island.net

Accepting the idea of abiotic oil leads many people to conclude that the oil companies are lying to us and that Peak Oil is a hype used to justify an unprecedented genocide. As much as I dislike oil companies, I do not see the logic in this "conspiracy theory".

The one area of agreement between the biotic and abiotic oil theories is that oil, being lighter than groundwater, rises through the Earth's crust eventually reaching the surface where it evaporates or is consumed by lifeforms. The oil we drill for is just that fraction of total oil that has been trapped by an impervious rock formation, generally in the shape of an inverted cup, that prevents the oil from reaching the surface.

If we accept the abiotic oil theory, that oil is generated from methane deep in the Earth's interior, then the oil accumulations we have found may have taken all 4.5 billion years of Earth's existence to accumulate, instead of the few hundred million years the biotic theory postulates.
If this abiotic production was still going on in any quantity meaningful to our rate of consumption, oil would be oozing to the surface everywhere. Generally, it is not.

In one article I read about abiotic oil, the author went on enthusiastically about an area in the Gulf of Mexico where "significant quantities" of oil are oozing to the surface. Researchers had measured the amount per area. I took that measurement and extrapolated it to every inch of the Earth's surface, above and below the oceans, a ridiculous and clearly Not Happening scenario. The total was 12 million barrels per YEAR. The USA alone uses 18.5 million barrels per DAY!! The world uses 73 million barrels per DAY!

The Russians have found oil where no one would expect it if they believed in the biotic theory exclusively. Thus one could say that some large fileds may remain to be discovered in locations previously thought to be geologically unlikely. That would be one perfectly logical conclusion one could arrive at as a result of believing in abiotic oil. To jump from there to abiotic oil is fully renewable and there is no shortage is ludicrous. Trees are renewable but if we cut down the trees faster than they can grow back we will still run out of trees.

Check your back yard, the local park, the bottom of a nearby lake. See any oil oozing out of the ground? Search the internet. Oil is not coming to the surface in any substantial quantities. Unless you believe that abiotic oil only occurs under impervious rock domes and nowhere else, this one observation alone is proof that abiotic oil is not being produced in any quantity that will prevent us running out at our current rates of consumption.

Abiotic oil is a reality. Of that I am convinced. However, to jump from "abiotic oil is real" to "abiotic oil is in unlimited supply" and Peak Oil is a hype is entirely unjustified by the evidence.

Abiotic Oil . . . a desperate ruse 18.Jul.2005 20:52

Razor Edalb

The theory of abiotic oil is easy to disprove and has most likely been disproved already.

The idea that dry wells replinish themselves is easily checked. Texas is full of well holes that were closed since they became unprofitably to pump. Many have been closed for more than 50 years.

Now think. If anyone seriously believed the wells were replinishing themselves, don't you think the oil companies or those who buy into the abiotic oil bit would be reopening these wells and pumping out the "new" oil?

That isn't happening so one has to wonder why. I don't think a global conspiracy is going to keep someone who thinks they can make a quick buck from trying to pump out all this "new" oil from wells that have already been drilled. That is simply contrary to human nature and greed which, much as it may be disliked is the reality "on the ground." No conspiracy theory is required to follow that logic.

Does anyone really believe that the owners of the wells wouldn't have reopened a few to check to see if the wells had replenished themselves? I don't. To them, it would be a windfall in terms of profits and there'd be a rush to reopen as many abandoned wells as they could as fast as they could. This hasn't/isn't happening, and given human nature, to imagine that they would pass up such an opportunity stretches credibility to the breaking point. The only other explanation (and the one that makes the most sense) is that they HAVE reopened a few just to check out the possibility that there may be something to the abiotic oil hypothesis and have quickly discovered it to be a sham.

It would be nice to think that oil will never run out (it never will completely, just become too expensive a proposition to get at the remaining oil), but we'd still be faced with the problem of global warming and an unlimited amount of oil would spell DOOM for the global environment.

Abiotic oil, IMO, is a cornucopian's wet dream; propogated by conspiracy theorists with too much time on their hands and too little active matter in their heads.

biotic oil is industry hocus pocus to justify higher prices and tax subsidies 15.Aug.2005 07:19


quote: "The idea that dry wells replinish themselves is easily checked. Texas is full of well holes that were closed since they became unprofitably to pump. Many have been closed for more than 50 years."

Exactly, "since they became unprofitable", not since they went dry. And what determines profit? Intentionally engineered scarcity.

Wells are closed by people, not by natural forces. And if you are interested in selling at a high price, you don't ever want to broach the subject that wells do keep refilling in some areas that previously "went dry" as noted in links above. Check the links above, it even gets out into the corporate media that this is occurring. Note from McGowan's info that even highly profitable oil refineries in California are being intentionally shut down to raise the price--and to make it socially appear that "oil is peaking" when it is their conscious decision to make it more dear and thus raise the price. You can believe what you want about the connections to an "oil genocide," though there really is no evidence that oil has ever come from biotic origins. What you have are instead powerful corporations dependent upon justifying their artificial "depletion allowances" scam and their whole industry price structure on what are basically hollow lies and hocus pocus.